Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000569
Črt Marinček, Dobrivoje S Stokic
{"title":"Editorial.","authors":"Črt Marinček, Dobrivoje S Stokic","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000569","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000569","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"46 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10665025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire (PMQ 2.0) represents a reliable solution for evaluating amputees' self-perceived mobility. The study aimed to evaluate the perceived mobility of middle-aged users with a traumatic amputation using the PMQ 2.0 and to assess the influence of age, stump and phantom limb pain, amputation level, time since amputation, and prosthesis use on it. Fifty subjects were recruited. The median value of the score was higher than previously published reference values, reflecting the 'active' mobility status of the sample. The hours of prosthesis use per day explained about 21% of the variance of the questionnaire score and was a significant predictor of perceived mobility. Reference values for the recently developed PMQ 2.0 survey and relative to active, traumatic amputees were reported. As prosthesis use was a significant predictor of the amputees' perceived mobility, prolonged use of the artificial limb should be always encouraged in clinical practice.
{"title":"Factors influencing the self-perceived mobility of active unilateral lower limb amputees assessed with the Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire: a brief report.","authors":"Federico Morosato, Cosimo Gentile, Arianna Di Bernardo, Emanuele Gruppioni, Antonella Miccio","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000560","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000560","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire (PMQ 2.0) represents a reliable solution for evaluating amputees' self-perceived mobility. The study aimed to evaluate the perceived mobility of middle-aged users with a traumatic amputation using the PMQ 2.0 and to assess the influence of age, stump and phantom limb pain, amputation level, time since amputation, and prosthesis use on it. Fifty subjects were recruited. The median value of the score was higher than previously published reference values, reflecting the 'active' mobility status of the sample. The hours of prosthesis use per day explained about 21% of the variance of the questionnaire score and was a significant predictor of perceived mobility. Reference values for the recently developed PMQ 2.0 survey and relative to active, traumatic amputees were reported. As prosthesis use was a significant predictor of the amputees' perceived mobility, prolonged use of the artificial limb should be always encouraged in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"46 1","pages":"108-111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10680336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000568
Daniele de Oliveira Nunes Duarte, Isabela Cristina Soares Cordeiro, Maria Aparecida Silva de Freitas, Geice Kely Karina Silva, Lucas Eugênio Soares Pires, Victor Siqueira Silva, Patrick R Avelino, Kênia Kiefer Parreiras de Menezes
This study aimed to validate the telephone-based application of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) for the assessment of the fear of falling in older people, and to investigate, among personal and environmental factors, which ones can explain this fear in this population. Participants answered the FES-I on two randomized occasions, face-to-face and by telephone. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,1 ) was used to investigate the levels of agreement between the two occasions. The possible factors associated were sex, age, previous history of falls, family arrangement, practice of physical activity, presence of orthopedic pathologies, use of walking aids, presence of visual impairment, and presence of stairs in the home environment. Linear regression analysis was applied to investigate which of these factors could explain the fear of falling in older people. One hundred twenty-two individuals were included. There was no significant difference in the mean difference obtained between the two applications of the FES-I (1 point; 95% confidence interval, -4 to 6), with a high level of agreement (ICC = 0.88). Sex and presence of orthopedic pathologies explained 14% of the model. The FES-I showed to be a reliable scale to be applied for telephone assessments of fear of falling in older people. In addition, women with orthopedic pathologies are the profile of older people with most afraid of falling.
{"title":"Telephone-based assessment of the fear of falling in older people and factors associated.","authors":"Daniele de Oliveira Nunes Duarte, Isabela Cristina Soares Cordeiro, Maria Aparecida Silva de Freitas, Geice Kely Karina Silva, Lucas Eugênio Soares Pires, Victor Siqueira Silva, Patrick R Avelino, Kênia Kiefer Parreiras de Menezes","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000568","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000568","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to validate the telephone-based application of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) for the assessment of the fear of falling in older people, and to investigate, among personal and environmental factors, which ones can explain this fear in this population. Participants answered the FES-I on two randomized occasions, face-to-face and by telephone. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,1 ) was used to investigate the levels of agreement between the two occasions. The possible factors associated were sex, age, previous history of falls, family arrangement, practice of physical activity, presence of orthopedic pathologies, use of walking aids, presence of visual impairment, and presence of stairs in the home environment. Linear regression analysis was applied to investigate which of these factors could explain the fear of falling in older people. One hundred twenty-two individuals were included. There was no significant difference in the mean difference obtained between the two applications of the FES-I (1 point; 95% confidence interval, -4 to 6), with a high level of agreement (ICC = 0.88). Sex and presence of orthopedic pathologies explained 14% of the model. The FES-I showed to be a reliable scale to be applied for telephone assessments of fear of falling in older people. In addition, women with orthopedic pathologies are the profile of older people with most afraid of falling.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"46 1","pages":"98-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9255476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study aimed to identify evaluation items that can be used to create an index to evaluate caregivers' fear of care recipient falls. A three-round Delphi method was conducted with medical professionals engaged in discharge support for patients with fall-related fractures. In the first round, a working group brainstormed evaluation items. In the second and third rounds, opinions of medical professionals were quantified and evaluation items were refined. The Delphi method showed convergence of opinion with Kendall's W of 0.561 in the third round. Of the 109 evaluation items pooled in the first round, the consensus was reached on the importance of 19 items and one more item was additionally included. The 20 items may be useful for creating an index that sensitively measures caregivers' fear of care recipient falls.
{"title":"Proposal of index to evaluate caregivers' fear of care recipient falls.","authors":"Tomohiro Kakehi, Naoki Tamura, Masashi Zenta, Yasunari Suzuki, Kyoko Nakajima, Hiromu Wada, Takuya Ishimori, Masahiko Bessho, Wataru Kakuda","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000543","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000543","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to identify evaluation items that can be used to create an index to evaluate caregivers' fear of care recipient falls. A three-round Delphi method was conducted with medical professionals engaged in discharge support for patients with fall-related fractures. In the first round, a working group brainstormed evaluation items. In the second and third rounds, opinions of medical professionals were quantified and evaluation items were refined. The Delphi method showed convergence of opinion with Kendall's W of 0.561 in the third round. Of the 109 evaluation items pooled in the first round, the consensus was reached on the importance of 19 items and one more item was additionally included. The 20 items may be useful for creating an index that sensitively measures caregivers' fear of care recipient falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"45 4","pages":"366-369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10265996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000548
Jessica J Wong, Astrid DeSouza, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson, Wouter De Groote, Hamid Varmazyar, Silvano A Mior, Paula J Stern, Danielle Southerst, Stephanie Alexopulos, Melissa Belchos, Nadège Lemeunier, Margareta C Nordin, Kent Murnaghan, Alarcos Cieza, Pierre Côté
Knowledge of the pre-rehabilitation generic status of functioning in individuals with low back pain is necessary to understand the clinical utility of rehabilitation care. We conducted a scoping review to describe the pre-rehabilitation functioning status of persons with nonspecific low back pain using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)-36 or WHODAS-12. We searched multiple databases from 2010 to 2021 for studies reporting pre-rehabilitation scores using WHODAS in persons with low back pain. Reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data, and we descriptively summarized results by the duration of low back pain (acute/subacute <3 months; chronic ≥3 months), and the WHODAS version. Of 1770 citations screened, eight citations were relevant. Five studies were conducted in Europe, two in America, and one in the African Region (mostly high-income countries). In persons with acute low back pain, the mean WHODAS-36 pre-rehabilitation summary score (complex scoring) was 22.8/100 (SD = 15.4) (one study). In persons with chronic low back pain, the mean WHODAS-36 summary score (complex scoring) ranged from 22.8/100 (SD = 5.7) to 41.5/100 (SD = 13.8) (two studies). For WHODAS-12 in persons with chronic low back pain, the mean summary score was 11.4/48 (SD = 8.7) or 14.4/48 (SD = 9.4) using simple scoring (two studies), and 25.8/100 (SD = 2.2) using complex scoring (one study). No floor or ceiling effects were observed in WHODAS-36 summary scores for chronic low back pain. Our scoping review comprehensively summarizes available studies reporting pre-rehabilitation levels of functioning using WHODAS in persons with low back pain. Persons with low back pain seeking rehabilitation have moderate limitations in functioning, and limitations level tends to be worse with chronic low back pain.
{"title":"Pre-rehabilitation scores of functioning measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in persons with nonspecific low back pain: a scoping review.","authors":"Jessica J Wong, Astrid DeSouza, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson, Wouter De Groote, Hamid Varmazyar, Silvano A Mior, Paula J Stern, Danielle Southerst, Stephanie Alexopulos, Melissa Belchos, Nadège Lemeunier, Margareta C Nordin, Kent Murnaghan, Alarcos Cieza, Pierre Côté","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000548","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knowledge of the pre-rehabilitation generic status of functioning in individuals with low back pain is necessary to understand the clinical utility of rehabilitation care. We conducted a scoping review to describe the pre-rehabilitation functioning status of persons with nonspecific low back pain using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)-36 or WHODAS-12. We searched multiple databases from 2010 to 2021 for studies reporting pre-rehabilitation scores using WHODAS in persons with low back pain. Reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data, and we descriptively summarized results by the duration of low back pain (acute/subacute <3 months; chronic ≥3 months), and the WHODAS version. Of 1770 citations screened, eight citations were relevant. Five studies were conducted in Europe, two in America, and one in the African Region (mostly high-income countries). In persons with acute low back pain, the mean WHODAS-36 pre-rehabilitation summary score (complex scoring) was 22.8/100 (SD = 15.4) (one study). In persons with chronic low back pain, the mean WHODAS-36 summary score (complex scoring) ranged from 22.8/100 (SD = 5.7) to 41.5/100 (SD = 13.8) (two studies). For WHODAS-12 in persons with chronic low back pain, the mean summary score was 11.4/48 (SD = 8.7) or 14.4/48 (SD = 9.4) using simple scoring (two studies), and 25.8/100 (SD = 2.2) using complex scoring (one study). No floor or ceiling effects were observed in WHODAS-36 summary scores for chronic low back pain. Our scoping review comprehensively summarizes available studies reporting pre-rehabilitation levels of functioning using WHODAS in persons with low back pain. Persons with low back pain seeking rehabilitation have moderate limitations in functioning, and limitations level tends to be worse with chronic low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"45 4","pages":"302-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5d/31/ijrr-45-302.PMC9631777.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10277978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000552
Ryan J Lowder, Abhishek Jaywant, Chaya B Fridman, Joan Toglia, Michael W O'Dell
Patient engagement during inpatient rehabilitation is an important component of rehabilitation therapy, as lower levels of engagement are associated with poorer outcomes. Cognitive deficits may impact patient engagement during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Here, we assess whether patient performance on the cognitive tasks of the 30-min National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke - Canadian Stroke Network (NINDS-CSN) screening battery predicts engagement in inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Prospective data from 110 participants completing inpatient stroke rehabilitation at an academic medical center were utilized for the present analyses. Cognitive functioning was assessed at inpatient stroke rehabilitation admission using the NINDS-CSN cognitive battery. Patient engagement was evaluated at discharge from an inpatient rehabilitation unit using the Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale. The results demonstrate that the NINDS-CSN cognitive battery, specifically subtests measuring executive functioning, attention and processing speed, predicts patient engagement in inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Cognitively impaired patients undergoing rehabilitation may benefit from modifications and interventions to increase engagement and improve functional outcomes.
{"title":"Cognitive impairment predicts engagement in inpatient stroke rehabilitation.","authors":"Ryan J Lowder, Abhishek Jaywant, Chaya B Fridman, Joan Toglia, Michael W O'Dell","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient engagement during inpatient rehabilitation is an important component of rehabilitation therapy, as lower levels of engagement are associated with poorer outcomes. Cognitive deficits may impact patient engagement during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Here, we assess whether patient performance on the cognitive tasks of the 30-min National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke - Canadian Stroke Network (NINDS-CSN) screening battery predicts engagement in inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Prospective data from 110 participants completing inpatient stroke rehabilitation at an academic medical center were utilized for the present analyses. Cognitive functioning was assessed at inpatient stroke rehabilitation admission using the NINDS-CSN cognitive battery. Patient engagement was evaluated at discharge from an inpatient rehabilitation unit using the Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale. The results demonstrate that the NINDS-CSN cognitive battery, specifically subtests measuring executive functioning, attention and processing speed, predicts patient engagement in inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Cognitively impaired patients undergoing rehabilitation may benefit from modifications and interventions to increase engagement and improve functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"45 4","pages":"359-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10267038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000550
Patrick R Avelino, Kênia K P Menezes, Lucas R Nascimento, Maria Tereza Mota Alvarenga, Jordana de Paula Magalhães, Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela, Aline A Scianni
Identifying the determinants of walking confidence can be crucial in therapeutic terms. On these bases, interventions to improve these factors could improve, in turn, walking confidence. Objective is to explore the relationship between motor impairments and activity limitation measures and walking confidence in people with chronic stroke. Walking confidence was assessed using the modified Gait Efficacy Scale. The independent variables were: strength of the hip flexors and knee flexors/extensors (measured with a dynamometer), lower limb coordination (assessed by the Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test), dynamic balance (assessed by the Four-Square Step Test), walking speed (from the 10-m Walk Test), aerobic capacity (from the 6-Minute Walk Test), and self-perceived locomotion ability (assessed by the ABILOCO). Pearson correlation was used to explore the relationships between the variables, and multiple linear regression to identify the independent explainers of walking confidence after stroke. Ninety chronic stroke individuals (35 men), with a mean age of 68 (SD 13) years were assessed. All independent variables were significantly correlated with walking confidence. Regarding the regression analysis, these measures explained 44% ( F = 9.21; P < 0.001) of the variance in walking confidence; however, only walking speed, strength of the hip flexor muscles, aerobic capacity, and perceived locomotion ability showed significance. All motor impairment and activity limitation measures correlated with walking confidence. However, the regression analysis highlighted that only walking speed, aerobic capacity, the strength of the hip flexor muscles, and perceived locomotion were independent explainers of walking confidence after stroke.
{"title":"Walking speed, hip muscles strength, aerobic capacity, and self-perceived locomotion ability most explain walking confidence after stroke: a cross-sectional experimental study.","authors":"Patrick R Avelino, Kênia K P Menezes, Lucas R Nascimento, Maria Tereza Mota Alvarenga, Jordana de Paula Magalhães, Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela, Aline A Scianni","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000550","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying the determinants of walking confidence can be crucial in therapeutic terms. On these bases, interventions to improve these factors could improve, in turn, walking confidence. Objective is to explore the relationship between motor impairments and activity limitation measures and walking confidence in people with chronic stroke. Walking confidence was assessed using the modified Gait Efficacy Scale. The independent variables were: strength of the hip flexors and knee flexors/extensors (measured with a dynamometer), lower limb coordination (assessed by the Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test), dynamic balance (assessed by the Four-Square Step Test), walking speed (from the 10-m Walk Test), aerobic capacity (from the 6-Minute Walk Test), and self-perceived locomotion ability (assessed by the ABILOCO). Pearson correlation was used to explore the relationships between the variables, and multiple linear regression to identify the independent explainers of walking confidence after stroke. Ninety chronic stroke individuals (35 men), with a mean age of 68 (SD 13) years were assessed. All independent variables were significantly correlated with walking confidence. Regarding the regression analysis, these measures explained 44% ( F = 9.21; P < 0.001) of the variance in walking confidence; however, only walking speed, strength of the hip flexor muscles, aerobic capacity, and perceived locomotion ability showed significance. All motor impairment and activity limitation measures correlated with walking confidence. However, the regression analysis highlighted that only walking speed, aerobic capacity, the strength of the hip flexor muscles, and perceived locomotion were independent explainers of walking confidence after stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"45 4","pages":"350-354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10274756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000542
Stephanie Posa, Marina B Wasilewski, Stewart W Mercer, Sharon Simpson, Lawrence R Robinson, Robert Simpson
The purpose of this review is to scope the literature on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with empathy and compassion in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Eligible studies included quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research that presented primary data on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with empathy and compassion in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Relevant studies were identified through CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PEDRO. Twenty-four studies were included (participant n = 3715): 13 quantitative, six mixed-methods, and five qualitative. In qualitative analysis, empathy and compassion were conceptualized as both intrinsic and exhibitory. Where self-compassion was examined as an intervention for patients, improvements in anxiety, depression, and quality of life were reported. Survey data suggested that when rehabilitation health care providers were perceived to be more empathic, patients reported greater treatment satisfaction, acceptance, adherence, and goal attainment. Individuals receiving and health care providers who deliver rehabilitative care conceptualize empathy and compassion as valuable in physical medicine and rehabilitation settings, with cognitive and behavioural elements described. Health care provider empathy and compassion-based interventions may influence outcomes positively in this context. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms of action of empathy and compassion and effectiveness in physical medicine and rehabilitation settings.
{"title":"Conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with empathy and compassion in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a scoping review.","authors":"Stephanie Posa, Marina B Wasilewski, Stewart W Mercer, Sharon Simpson, Lawrence R Robinson, Robert Simpson","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000542","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000542","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this review is to scope the literature on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with empathy and compassion in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Eligible studies included quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research that presented primary data on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with empathy and compassion in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Relevant studies were identified through CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PEDRO. Twenty-four studies were included (participant n = 3715): 13 quantitative, six mixed-methods, and five qualitative. In qualitative analysis, empathy and compassion were conceptualized as both intrinsic and exhibitory. Where self-compassion was examined as an intervention for patients, improvements in anxiety, depression, and quality of life were reported. Survey data suggested that when rehabilitation health care providers were perceived to be more empathic, patients reported greater treatment satisfaction, acceptance, adherence, and goal attainment. Individuals receiving and health care providers who deliver rehabilitative care conceptualize empathy and compassion as valuable in physical medicine and rehabilitation settings, with cognitive and behavioural elements described. Health care provider empathy and compassion-based interventions may influence outcomes positively in this context. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms of action of empathy and compassion and effectiveness in physical medicine and rehabilitation settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"45 4","pages":"291-301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10639325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000549
Domenico Angilecchia, Flavia Stano, Maria Signorelli, Giuseppe Giovannico, Sanaz Pournajaf, Leonardo Pellicciari
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgeries are increasing; to assess quality of life after THA, an instrument that considers patient's perspective on surgical outcomes is necessary. The objective of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-I) in patients with THA. The FJS-I was administered to 111 patients with THA, as well as the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and the EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L). Structural validity [confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)], internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1 )], measurement error [standard error of the measurement (SEM)], and construct validity (hypothesis testing with correlation of the WOMAC, NPRS, and EQ-5D-5L) were assessed. In addition, the minimal detectable change (MDC) was computed. The result of CFA confirmed the one-factor structure. Internal consistency was supported (α = 0.944). A high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.958; 95% confidence interval, 0.914-0.980) was found with an SEM and an MDC of 5.3 and 16.6 points, respectively. The a-priori hypotheses were fully met, determining the construct validity to be satisfactory. Psychometric properties of the FJS-I were confirmed, and it can be used for single-person assessment. Further research is suggested to refine its structural validity.
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Forgotten Joint Score in patients with total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Domenico Angilecchia, Flavia Stano, Maria Signorelli, Giuseppe Giovannico, Sanaz Pournajaf, Leonardo Pellicciari","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000549","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgeries are increasing; to assess quality of life after THA, an instrument that considers patient's perspective on surgical outcomes is necessary. The objective of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-I) in patients with THA. The FJS-I was administered to 111 patients with THA, as well as the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and the EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L). Structural validity [confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)], internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1 )], measurement error [standard error of the measurement (SEM)], and construct validity (hypothesis testing with correlation of the WOMAC, NPRS, and EQ-5D-5L) were assessed. In addition, the minimal detectable change (MDC) was computed. The result of CFA confirmed the one-factor structure. Internal consistency was supported (α = 0.944). A high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.958; 95% confidence interval, 0.914-0.980) was found with an SEM and an MDC of 5.3 and 16.6 points, respectively. The a-priori hypotheses were fully met, determining the construct validity to be satisfactory. Psychometric properties of the FJS-I were confirmed, and it can be used for single-person assessment. Further research is suggested to refine its structural validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"45 4","pages":"343-349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10278027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000546
Darko Milaščević, F Virginia Wright, Milan Milošević, David Neubauer
The Challenge-20 is an assessment of advanced motor skills of children with cerebral palsy. The purpose of this study was to develop age-related norms and percentile curves for the Challenge-20 with typically developing children ( n = 150, 7 through 11 years), and compare Challenge-20 scores of independently ambulatory children with CP, Gross Motor Function Classification System level I ( n = 135) and II ( n = 56) to these age norms. Younger TD children (7 years) scored lowest, and older children (11 years) scored highest on the Challenge-20 , showing similar developmental trajectories. Challenge-20 scores of 15% of children in GMFCS level I were situated above the lower 2.5th percentile curve of the typically developing children's Challenge-20 growth curve, that is, overlapping into the typically developing child zone. The Challenge-20 is sensitive to the progression of advanced gross motor skills in typically developing children. Children with cerebral palsy, GMFCS I follow similar, albeit lower, Challenge score trajectory to that of typically developing children, and in some cases come close to lower level abilities of typically developing children. The reference values with typically developing children extend the Challenge-20 's utility when assessing advanced gross motor skill of independently ambulatory children with cerebral palsy for physiotherapy intervention and physical activity planning and open the door to re-thinking more about advanced gross motor interventions for children with cerebral palsy in GMFCS levels I and II given their potential to progress along the developmental trajectory.
{"title":"Measuring advanced motor skills in children with cerebral palsy: development of normative data and percentile curves for the Challenge-20 assessment.","authors":"Darko Milaščević, F Virginia Wright, Milan Milošević, David Neubauer","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000546","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Challenge-20 is an assessment of advanced motor skills of children with cerebral palsy. The purpose of this study was to develop age-related norms and percentile curves for the Challenge-20 with typically developing children ( n = 150, 7 through 11 years), and compare Challenge-20 scores of independently ambulatory children with CP, Gross Motor Function Classification System level I ( n = 135) and II ( n = 56) to these age norms. Younger TD children (7 years) scored lowest, and older children (11 years) scored highest on the Challenge-20 , showing similar developmental trajectories. Challenge-20 scores of 15% of children in GMFCS level I were situated above the lower 2.5th percentile curve of the typically developing children's Challenge-20 growth curve, that is, overlapping into the typically developing child zone. The Challenge-20 is sensitive to the progression of advanced gross motor skills in typically developing children. Children with cerebral palsy, GMFCS I follow similar, albeit lower, Challenge score trajectory to that of typically developing children, and in some cases come close to lower level abilities of typically developing children. The reference values with typically developing children extend the Challenge-20 's utility when assessing advanced gross motor skill of independently ambulatory children with cerebral palsy for physiotherapy intervention and physical activity planning and open the door to re-thinking more about advanced gross motor interventions for children with cerebral palsy in GMFCS levels I and II given their potential to progress along the developmental trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"45 4","pages":"329-335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10326336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}