International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care最新文献

The REAL World Data (RWD) In Asia for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) guidance was developed by a regional working group to facilitate the increasing acceptance of real-world evidence (RWE) in Asia. We compared the consistency of REALISE against guidance from Japan and China.

Country-specific guidance for RWE/RWD use in pharmaceutical development were identified in May 2022 through governmental websites, with validation searches via Google. Sections from local guidance were mapped onto REALISE and categorized as “agree”, “mixed”, “disagree” or “missing” based on coverage and consistency.

Five Japanese and three Chinese documents were mapped. Most sections in Chinese guidance (77%) and 36 percent of sections in Japanese guidance were tagged “agree” or “mixed”, with general alignment on definitions and good practice considerations (study design, accountability); however, 63 percent of Japanese sections were tagged “missing” from REALISE. As local documents took the regulatory perspective, they lacked REALISE’s discussion of translating RWD to RWE for HTA/economic evaluations specifically. Local guidance focused on practicalities of RWD collection in local contexts, including descriptions of specific actions (e.g., evaluating RWD sources, ensuring data security) rather than overarching principles described in REALISE; specifically, Japanese guidance described how to access and analyze databases/registries, reflecting Japan’s landscape of robust sources of national healthcare data, but lacked discussion of other RWE study types, data sources and specialized analytical methods. While Chinese guidance had a broader view of RWD types (more similar to REALISE), they also contained discussions on pharmacovigilance and omics data, communication with regulatory bodies, and incorporation of RWE into the approval pathway for traditional Chinese medicines.

Despite differing purposes (with no RWE guidance from local HTA bodies), local and regional guidance align on general principles/good practice in generating/using RWE, providing common ground for increasing usage of RWE in HTA in Asia.

In order to increase the value of its services and activities, the Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS) has incorporated in its strategic plan the commitment to improve the processes, quality and people, while ensuring transparency, independence, rigor and efficiency following the guidelines of the European Foundation for Quality Management. We aim to present the standardization processes to improve the efficiency in elaborating health technology assessment (HTA) reports at AQuAS.

Process standardization has been developed in seven stages: (i) definition of scope, objectives and creation of working groups; (ii) mapping and analysis of all ongoing processes to determine whether they needed improvement or were already optimal; (iii) creation of new processes by evaluating the inclusion of automatic tools and their possible digitization; (iv) creation of the process map; (v) communication to the team for its implementation after training; (vi) dissemination on corporate website; (vii) monitoring and evaluation of their impact.

The creation of AQuAS’ HTA report development process map has involved 14 people over the past two years. After an initial two-day workshop, the team was organized in working groups of two to three people, with regular monitoring and the creation of a specific knowledge management unit led by the AQuAS’ evaluation manager. The process map was configured based on three axes. The strategic axis contains legal frameworks, ethical principles, good practices and methodological frameworks (29 specific for HTA reports). The key axis presents in an integrated way the process and methodology followed from the request of the HTA report to the final product’s dissemination. The support axis includes, among other, the management of 31 requests, information specialist processes (37 searches), training (51 courses) and 6 internal procedures with their corresponding 26 templates and 27 tools.

With a process reengineering approach, HTA reporting has become more efficient. We believe this approach can help other agencies improve their internal processes and subsequently improve team and customer satisfaction.

Health technology assessment (HTA) agencies are increasingly embracing patient experience data (PED) to support reimbursement decisions. This study aimed to describe the European Network for HTA (EUnetHTA) and HTA agencies expectations regarding PED to support reimbursement in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK.

Published HTA guidance documents were reviewed to identify recommendations related to clinical outcomes assessment (COA) (including disease-specificity, validation, analyses, endpoints and interpretation) and other forms of PED (e.g., patient preference information) in HTA decision-making. Insights from guidance documents were supplemented with a review of literature and published HTA cases and interviews with key opinion leaders (KOLs) focused on current and future states.

The German and French guidance documents include PED recommendations focused on relevant COA and health-related quality of life data, without detailing preferred COA measures. However, key differences were noted between these two countries in the methodological approaches regarding responder definitions, acceptable missing data threshold and multiplicity analyses. These differences were reinforced by the case studies and the KOLs. UK’s sources also focused on COA, in general proposing specific use of the EQ-5D to derive utility values for modelling, but included limited details on other PED-related elements. The Italian and Spanish guidance documents do not detail COA or other PED expectations, but the Italian KOL described that COA is considered if submitted. The currently developed EUnetHTA21 guidelines include PED-related information that bear the signature of certain individual HTA bodies. Globally, there is limited interest in PED beyond COA across the agencies.

The level of expectations with regards to PED varies across EUnetHTA and several European HTA agencies. Interest in PED derived from non-COA sources is limited across the countries. Knowing each agency’s expectations with regards to PED is key when submitting HTA evidence dossiers and should be considered early in clinical trial design to integrate market access perspectives and optimize drug development. Global harmonization would help advancing PED measurement standards.

An estimated 17.9 million people died from cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in 2019, which is 32 percent of all global deaths and 85 percent were due to heart attack and stroke. Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for presenting to the emergency department (ED). It is increasingly recognized that artificial intelligence (AI) will have a significant impact on the practice of medicine in the near future and may help with diagnosis and risk stratification. We aim to estimate a diagnostic prediction of acute myocardial infarction by the development and validation of an AI model.

Data on 134 variables of 3,986 consecutive patients who presented to the ED with non-traumatic chest pain were included in the analysis. Using AI tools, a neural network model was developed to establish the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to achieve n=150 patients over 18 years of age attending the ED.

The mean age was 65.5 (±13.7) years and 63.6 percent were male. Most (60.1%) patients were admitted to hospital, with only 20.3 percent diagnosed at hospital discharge with ischemic heart disease (IHD). All patients were followed up for two months, and 6.3 percent were readmitted to the ED, but none presented with an episode of IHD. In the data analysis of the entire sample we obtained a probability of diagnosing IHD by the SmartHeart model (S=93.1%, E=47.3%, PPV=31.0%, and NPV=96.4%). When we analyzed the sample of patients with no history of IHD (n=104), the diagnosis accuracy was as follows (S=100%, E=77.5%, PPV=42.8%, and NPV=100%).

Our AI model provides information to predict patients who are suffering from acute IHD. AI has been reported to outperform emergency physicians and current risk stratification tools to diagnose IHD, but has rarely been integrated into practice. This study highlights the diagnostic applicability and accuracy of this type of tool and that is why studies should be implemented to see its effectiveness in routine practice in EDs.

Health technology assessment (HTA) bodies support healthcare decision-making by producing different kind of products. The high speed of the healthcare innovations and the scenarios such as the COVID-19 pandemic challenge HTA organizations to adapt their services to better respond to these demands. The Spanish Network of HTA Agencies (RedETS) is redefining the services and the products in its portfolio. The first step has been conducting a review in order to identify the most relevant HTA products.

A scoping review with two sections was conducted: (i) analysis of results from a bibliographic search performed in the main biomedical databases; and (ii) analysis of results from a manual review of the official websites of seven international HTA agencies: CADTH (Canada), INESSS (Canada), SBU (Sweden), NICE (United Kingdom), IQWIG (Germany), HAS (France), IECS (Argentina) and IETS (Colombia). The EUnetHTA website was also reviewed.

The search identified 1,311 references; 21 studies were considered relevant. The main topic found was about rapid responses services. The standard timeline for these should be less than six months, with even some produced in days. Transparency about methodology and involvement of decision-makers were considered key points to be included. Website analysis revealed similar HTA reports production but variation in the domains and elements considered. The timeframe for conducting a full HTA report can be up to 24 months, with a median of 12 months. Agencies also offer some kinds of rapid response services. Scientific consultation and horizon scanning systems for emerging technologies are other services performed by some agencies.

The review reveals that agencies have different products to address different needs throughout the life cycle of technologies: from scientific advice to full HTA. In addition, HTA agencies have incorporated rapid responses into their services. According to literature, these products could support short-term decision-making.

Currently, no cure exists for the 1 in 2,500 Australian babies born with potentially fatal cystic fibrosis (CF). The authors conducted a health technology assessment (HTA) case study analysis of all regulatory approved CF treatments in Australia from January 1994 to July 2022. Submissions were also made under the Therapeutics Goods Administration and Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (TGA-PBAC) parallel process.

Public summary and source materials were researched to understand relevant clinical and health economic evidence requirements, and access decisions from Australia’s lead HTA body, PBAC.

The review found that there are more than seven approved products in Australia. Of those, all four novel CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulating medications, which treat the underlying disease, received an orphan drug designation and were eventually listed. However, initial HTA decisions were mixed, with one recommended (25%), one not recommended (25%), and two deferred (50%). Clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness, clinical need, as well as patient/carer-centric perspectives were most influential in HTA recommendations. Like other rare disease treatments, price, high incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), uncertainty around cost-effectiveness and/or efficacy were key barriers to positive decisions. Notably, Australian stakeholders did not recommend CF medicines when their ICERs significantly exceeded a threshold of AUD200,000 (USD134,700) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Administratively, Australia addresses risks associated with poor cost-effectiveness and high costs through managed access programs, risk-sharing agreements (RSA) and special pricing arrangements.

Recently approved elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor would be inaccessible to many Australian patients without inclusion in the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS); this placement increases access by limiting patients’ payments to AUD42.50 (USD28.62) maximum per prescription. Alternatively, manufacturers of therapies for other chronic or rare life-threatening conditions can participate in Australia’s Highly Specialised Drugs Program and/or Life Saving Drugs Program to facilitate access.

Companies can accelerate and optimize market access by using the TGA-PBAC parallel process. Other Asia-Pacific countries can model components of Australia’s approach to advancing access to innovative, live-saving therapies.

Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) refers to a group of heart defects that cause serious, life-threatening symptoms in the neonatal period and requires timely surgical or catheter interventions. We reviewed evidence for incorporating a mandatory neonatal CCHD screening test as a national public health project for all neonates born in Korea by analyzing the validity and cost-effectiveness of neonatal CCHD screening using pulse oximetry in Korea.

We performed a rapid literature review to establish models for the diagnostic accuracy and economic evaluation of pulse oximetry. Also, we analyzed the prevalence, mortality, and medical expenditure for different types of CCHD using the national health insurance (NHI) data. We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of pulse oximetry by comparing the group of neonates who received a combination of a physical examination and pulse oximetry, and group of neonates who only received a physical examination. For the cost-effectiveness analysis for the CCHD screening test in this study, we used a duration of one year, diagnostic accuracy as the clinical endpoint, and Life Year Gain (LYG) as the effectiveness indicator.

We used recent systematic review he pooled sensitivity can be enhanced from 76.5 percent (pulse oximetry alone) to 92 percent (combined with physical examination). We used a total of 2,334 neonates with CCHD data for the economic model. Our analysis revealed that adding pulse oximetry to the routine neonatal physical examination leads to 2.34 of LYG and a cost difference of USD1,080,602, showing a ICER of KRW610,063,240 (USD461,857)/LYG.

Considering the benefit of LYG and cost of reducing the complications and after effects of newborns with CCHD who survived early diagnosis, it is considered to be worthwhile in Korea for a mandatory screening test.