International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care最新文献

Hyperparathyroidism is a medical condition characterized by an excess of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the blood. This hormone is produced by the parathyroid glands, located behind the thyroid gland. PTH plays a crucial role in regulating calcium levels in the body, which is necessary for muscle activity, nerve transmission, and maintaining bone density. In this study, the authors aimed to determine the parameters necessary for defining the delivery process of interventions for managing hyperparathyroidism.

To achieve this, a group of Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) was surveyed using a questionnaire to investigate specific drivers such as the duration of interventions, drug therapies employed, and materials required. The authors also estimated the indirect costs associated with patients and caregivers. The economic analysis considered the perspectives of both the Italian National Health Service (SSN) and the community. The analysis was conducted using Activity Based Costing (ABC) methods to determine the full cost sustained for a parathyroidectomy surgery and pharmacological therapies per patient treated, as well as the average resources absorbed by a patient managed through pure surveillance.

The results showed that the average annual cost of parathyroidectomy and pharmacological therapies per patient was EUR5,193.20 and EUR1,726.96, respectively. Productivity losses due to the interventions amounted to EUR858.21 and EUR66.80 for the patient and caregiver, respectively. The pure surveillance strategy incurred an average yearly cost of EUR197.42.

The study’s major limitation was the lack of evidence available concerning the therapies under analysis, particularly in the Italian context. Nonetheless, the survey of clinicians provided useful insights into the expenditures associated with implementing interventions for managing hyperparathyroidism. In conclusion, managing hyperparathyroidism involves considerable costs, and healthcare providers must consider the perspectives of both the SSN and the community when estimating the economic impact of interventions. The authors’ analysis provides insights into the cost of different interventions, which could help healthcare providers make informed decisions when managing hyperparathyroidism.

Chronic pain is a debilitating condition with a high burden of disease. Neurostimulation therapy is an established modality for patients with chronic pain refractory to pharmacological based approaches and conservative interventional therapies. The therapy has evolved over the decades, based on improved understanding of the mechanisms of action, as well as technological advancement in device design.

Our objective is to conduct a review of the innovation in neurostimulation therapy for chronic pain, in the context of health technology assessment (HTA), and its implications on policies related to patient access.

A qualitative literature review was conducted to identify published HTAs, systematic reviews, clinical guidelines and other relevant articles and reports on neurostimulation therapies used in pain management. Searches were limited to the past 10 years to ensure that a contemporary analysis was conducted.

Our review indicates that there has been continuous innovation in neurostimulation therapies for chronic pain. This includes improvements in battery longevity and reduced size, advances in the design of leads, the development of novel stimulation waveforms and personalized programming using sophisticated algorithms including sensing and feedback loops, and remote management to name a few. Clinical research has also enabled an expansion in the range of neural targets and indicated subpopulations. The literature shows that apart from reduction in pain, neurostimulation therapy facilitates improvements in the quality of life, and reduction in opioid dependence, carer burden and disability, which are outcomes important to patients as well as to society at large. Clinical guidelines are largely supportive of neurostimulation for the management of chronic refractory pain in carefully selected patients.

The range and complexity of neurostimulation devices and the variety of study designs presents a challenge for evidence synthesis. HTA bodies need to ensure that the methodologies for evaluating a heterogeneous therapy such as neurostimulation for pain management are robust, and that the policies for determining access to such innovative therapies are patient-centric and fit-for-purpose.

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a condition that leads to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function. In 2021, the healthcare system expenditure of CKD in Australia was estimated to be over AUD2.3 billion (USD1.5 billion), largely attributed to Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT, dialysis or kidney transplantation). This exploratory analysis aims to calculate the cost-benefit to the Australian healthcare system should KRT be delayed.

The prevalence of ESRD with and without KRT between 2016 and 2021 was estimated, and a simple linear regression model was created to estimate the prevalence of ESRD with KRT between 2022 and 2026. The projected cost of KRT management in 2022 was calculated, enabling an approximate cost benefit presented as the number of patients needed to reduce expenditure by AUD1 million (USD0.7 million).

In 2021, it was calculated that 34,554 patients live with ESRD in Australia, of which 28,542 patients are on KRT. The number of new patients on KRT increases linearly by an average of 943 patients per year and provided a model with a strong goodness-of-fit (R2 = 0.99); predicting that the prevalence of patients on KRT is estimated to increase to 33,417 patients by 2026. Dialysis accounts for the highest cost associated with ESRD management, estimated to be AUD87,975/year/patient (USD58,253), and accounts for over AUD1.3 billion (USD0.9 billion) in annual expenditure. When considering the proportion of patients receiving KRT undergoing dialysis (52.6%), first-year renal transplant (3.4%), and post-kidney transplantation (43.9%), in 2022, the average annual cost per patient receiving KRT is estimated to be AUD57,565 (USD38,109). The prevention of KRT in 17.4 patients in 2022, decreasing to 15.4 patients in 2026, has the potential to save AUD1 million/year (USD0.7 million).

The prevalence of ESRD in Australia increases linearly and contributes to a significant cost to the Australian healthcare system. In 2022, preventing KRT in 17.4 patients (0.06%) can equate to a saving of AUD1 million/year (USD0.7 million), further decreasing to 15.4 patients (0.05%) in 2026.

The organizational impact (OI) of new technologies is becoming a major driver for our healthcare systems and for modernizing the care pathway for the benefit of users and professionals. Some technologies give rise to a reorganization of the healthcare system, particularly in the case of connected medical devices.

The Medical Device Committee at Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) appraises medical devices (MD) in view of their reimbursement by the French health insurance scheme. The Committee’s evaluation criteria take account of the therapeutic benefit of the MD and its public health benefit. OI-related aspects are frequently claimed by health technology developers (HTD) in their MD submission dossiers. However, this aspect is rarely documented. Therefore, guidance explaining how HTD should support and structure any claim of an OI was needed.

This work was based on the HAS OI Map for Health Technology Assessment published in 2020, the analyses of specific HAS opinions, hearings with concerned stakeholders (HTD, service providers and patients), and a committee meeting focused on OI.

The HTD guide for MD submission was updated with guidance to support OI claims. For each claimed OI, the HTD should identify the criterion corresponding to the most relevant OI, the indicator to describe each selected criterion, the stakeholders concerned, and the data to be provided. The choice of method is according to the OI: if the indicator is measurable, data from validated measurement tools are expected. If not, especially in cases where the use of the MD requires a specific organization before its deployment, the absence of data must be justified and a detailed impact analysis is necessary. In this case, the development plan for the demonstration of the OI is needed.

With this updated guide for HTDs, claimed OI dimension shall be better supported in future MD dossiers submitted to HAS in view of their reimbursement in France.

Health technology assessment (HTA) agencies are increasingly embracing patient experience data (PED) to support reimbursement decisions. This study aimed to review HTA agencies’ expectations with regards to utilizing PED to support drug reimbursement in Australia, Japan, and China.

Published HTA guidance documents were reviewed in 2021 to identify any PED-specific information. If available, recommendations related to the type of PED (e.g., generic vs. disease-specific clinical outcomes assessment (COA)); COA validation, analyses, endpoints and interpretation; and the interest in PED beyond COA in HTA decision-making (e.g., patient preference information) were reviewed. Literature review and semi-structured interviews with key opinion leaders (KOLs) were conducted to further explore these themes and future trends with regards to PED.

Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee guidance document includes a dedicated section on patient-reported outcomes (PRO), providing details on preferred PRO instruments; validation expectations; and recommended methods to explore score interpretation, assess and report PRO results and handle missing data. While PED derived from non-PRO sources are not discussed in the guidance, the KOL noted that they should not be ruled out. Japan’s Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health guideline includes a section dedicated to PROs without details related to instrument validation, analyses and interpretation, however, is focused on the use of PRO to inform health economic assessments. In China, the HTA center of China National Health Commission drafted two disease-specific technical guidance documents recommending the inclusion of PROs in efficacy assessments and use of instruments relevant in the Chinese population; these points were echoed by the KOL interviewed.

There are recommendations on PED use included in country-specific guidance documents, however their level of detail varies greatly. Knowing each agency’s expectations with regards to PED is key when submitting HTA evidence dossiers and should be considered early in clinical trial design to integrate market access perspectives and optimize drug development.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective and safe option for patients with refractory neuropathic pain, with positive health technology assessment (HTA) recommendations across Western Europe, yet SCS uptake remains low. Estimating target patient populations within HTAs may impact upon medical device uptake, pricing and access. However, there is a dearth of information on how this is typically conducted. This study aimed to compare the approaches of Western Europe HTA agencies for estimating the target population for SCS.

A survey was conducted among members of the Health Economics and Reimbursement function from Western Europe to collect country-specific information on how HTA agencies assess the target population of medical devices (MD). The estimations of the target population for SCS were extracted from HTA publications and compared.

Eight Health Economics and Reimbursement (HER) Analysts from France, Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), Belgium, Spain, Italy, Sweden and Norway completed the survey. HTA Agencies in France, UK and Belgium routinely ask for epidemiological data in the manufacturer submission, whereas in Germany, Sweden and Norway the request is dependent on the type of HTA submission. All HTA agencies, except NICE (UK), perform an independent estimation of the target population. HTA agencies in Germany and UK typically use epidemiological data from industry. In all countries, the estimation of the target population may indirectly impact the price of the MD, especially when budget impact analysis indicates a potential high use of healthcare resources. Only France, Belgium and UK have published HTA recommendations about SCS, however the estimated target population, nor the number of patients with refractory neuropathic pain, is not always included. Only the French and UK HTA agencies publish an approximation of the target population for SCS using the number of patients implanted every year.

This study showed there is a lack of harmonization between Western European HTA agencies’ guidelines on the inclusion and estimation of target patient populations. The new EU HTA Regulation should help to address this situation.