International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care最新文献

Pediatric cancers are rare tumors, heterogeneous in location and biologically very different from adult cancers. Documented survival variation across European countries and Italian regions shows that there is still room for further improvement by reducing inequalities. We aim to understand why there are differences in survival. The BENCHISTA-ITA project (National Benchmarking of Childhood Cancer Survival by Stage at diagnosis), that is the Italian twin project of the International BENCHISTA, collects stage at diagnosis of solid pediatric tumors, according to the Toronto Guidelines. We will compare how far the cancer has spread at diagnosis and test if differences in tumor stage explain any survival differences between Italian regions.

The project study involved the stage distribution and the survival of 9 pediatric solid tumors diagnosed between 2013 and 2017 in Italy. All patients therefore had at least 3 years of follow-up in 2021 for life-stage definition. The study involves the identification of all new diagnoses of cancer, evaluation of the clinical documentation of cases eligible for research, and international classification and coding. Analyses of stage distribution and survival rates for each tumor type will be described.

Data from 35 population-based cancer registries from 18 out of 20 Italian regions were collected covering about 84 percent of the Italian child population. In particular, data on: imaging/examination performed before any treatment; source used for staging; primary treatment defined as given within one year from diagnosis; relapse/ recurrence/ progression; follow up and status of life. The study tested the applicability of the Toronto Guidelines as a tool to obtain population-level comparable stage information for childhood cancers. There were 1,343 cases collected (242 Neuroblastoma, 124 Wilms Tumour, 145 Medulloblastoma, 148 Osteosarcoma, 135 Ewing sarcoma, 115 Rhabdomyososarcoma, 54 Ependymoma, 47 Retinoblastoma, 333 Astrocytoma). Toronto stage could be assigned in more than 90 percent in the majority of tumors. Tumors in which it was more difficult to assign the stage using the Toronto staging guidelines were ependymoma, astrocytoma, and retinoblastoma. It was easier to retrieve data for patients in the 0-14 years of age range than adolescents (14-18 years). Differences in stage distribution and survival differences between regional grouping were presented.

The Italian BENCHISTA project, improving the connection between pediatric cancer registries, aims to improve care of children with cancer across the nation, reducing possible disparities.

The wide adoption of the Toronto Guidelines will facilitate international comparative incidence studies, strengthen the interpretation of survival data, and contribute to more appropriate solutions to improve childhood cancer outcomes.

Pursuant to the Universal Health Care Act of 2019, the Health Technology Assessment Council (HTAC) in the Philippines was mandated to make recommendations for government financing of health technologies, including medical devices. The development of a Philippine Essential Medical Device List (PEMDL) will serve as a guide for the procurement of medical devices and supplies in government health facilities and as the basis for creating a price reference index.

The HTAC and a team of medical device experts (the Expert Advisory Committee) developed a streamlined pathway and guidelines using a Delphi technique with the Philippine Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Health (DOH) to determine the necessary criteria for fast tracking the inclusion of medical devices. The pathway was also revised throughout a pilot processing of commonly procured medical devices (e.g., consumables) that were either already covered by existing national health insurance packages or funded by DOH programs, among others.

The final pathway consisted of validating whether the device was already approved by the Philippine FDA and whether it was already part of standard of care. Similar to the usual HTA nomination requirement, the local FDA approval attested to the safety and quality of the device. Meanwhile, the inclusion of the device in the standard of care guaranteed that it was essential in the healthcare setting. This can be written in the World Health Organization technical documents and databases such as the Medical Devices Information System, health facility listing requirements, or locally adopted clinical practice guidelines. The initial PEMDL for release contained a total of 307 medical devices across 16 categories.

Unlike the mandate for the Philippine National Formulary, government health facilities are not yet required to base their procurement on the PEMDL because the list is still in its infancy. Moving forward, the list will include big ticket items and will be updated through consultations with specialty centers and hospitals.

Health technology assessment (HTA) bodies support healthcare decision-making by producing different kind of products. The high speed of the healthcare innovations and the scenarios such as the COVID-19 pandemic challenge HTA organizations to adapt their services to better respond to these demands. The Spanish Network of HTA Agencies (RedETS) is redefining the services and the products in its portfolio. The first step has been conducting a review in order to identify the most relevant HTA products.

A scoping review with two sections was conducted: (i) analysis of results from a bibliographic search performed in the main biomedical databases; and (ii) analysis of results from a manual review of the official websites of seven international HTA agencies: CADTH (Canada), INESSS (Canada), SBU (Sweden), NICE (United Kingdom), IQWIG (Germany), HAS (France), IECS (Argentina) and IETS (Colombia). The EUnetHTA website was also reviewed.

The search identified 1,311 references; 21 studies were considered relevant. The main topic found was about rapid responses services. The standard timeline for these should be less than six months, with even some produced in days. Transparency about methodology and involvement of decision-makers were considered key points to be included. Website analysis revealed similar HTA reports production but variation in the domains and elements considered. The timeframe for conducting a full HTA report can be up to 24 months, with a median of 12 months. Agencies also offer some kinds of rapid response services. Scientific consultation and horizon scanning systems for emerging technologies are other services performed by some agencies.

The review reveals that agencies have different products to address different needs throughout the life cycle of technologies: from scientific advice to full HTA. In addition, HTA agencies have incorporated rapid responses into their services. According to literature, these products could support short-term decision-making.

Currently, no cure exists for the 1 in 2,500 Australian babies born with potentially fatal cystic fibrosis (CF). The authors conducted a health technology assessment (HTA) case study analysis of all regulatory approved CF treatments in Australia from January 1994 to July 2022. Submissions were also made under the Therapeutics Goods Administration and Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (TGA-PBAC) parallel process.

Public summary and source materials were researched to understand relevant clinical and health economic evidence requirements, and access decisions from Australia’s lead HTA body, PBAC.

The review found that there are more than seven approved products in Australia. Of those, all four novel CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulating medications, which treat the underlying disease, received an orphan drug designation and were eventually listed. However, initial HTA decisions were mixed, with one recommended (25%), one not recommended (25%), and two deferred (50%). Clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness, clinical need, as well as patient/carer-centric perspectives were most influential in HTA recommendations. Like other rare disease treatments, price, high incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), uncertainty around cost-effectiveness and/or efficacy were key barriers to positive decisions. Notably, Australian stakeholders did not recommend CF medicines when their ICERs significantly exceeded a threshold of AUD200,000 (USD134,700) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Administratively, Australia addresses risks associated with poor cost-effectiveness and high costs through managed access programs, risk-sharing agreements (RSA) and special pricing arrangements.

Recently approved elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor would be inaccessible to many Australian patients without inclusion in the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS); this placement increases access by limiting patients’ payments to AUD42.50 (USD28.62) maximum per prescription. Alternatively, manufacturers of therapies for other chronic or rare life-threatening conditions can participate in Australia’s Highly Specialised Drugs Program and/or Life Saving Drugs Program to facilitate access.

Companies can accelerate and optimize market access by using the TGA-PBAC parallel process. Other Asia-Pacific countries can model components of Australia’s approach to advancing access to innovative, live-saving therapies.

Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) refers to a group of heart defects that cause serious, life-threatening symptoms in the neonatal period and requires timely surgical or catheter interventions. We reviewed evidence for incorporating a mandatory neonatal CCHD screening test as a national public health project for all neonates born in Korea by analyzing the validity and cost-effectiveness of neonatal CCHD screening using pulse oximetry in Korea.

We performed a rapid literature review to establish models for the diagnostic accuracy and economic evaluation of pulse oximetry. Also, we analyzed the prevalence, mortality, and medical expenditure for different types of CCHD using the national health insurance (NHI) data. We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of pulse oximetry by comparing the group of neonates who received a combination of a physical examination and pulse oximetry, and group of neonates who only received a physical examination. For the cost-effectiveness analysis for the CCHD screening test in this study, we used a duration of one year, diagnostic accuracy as the clinical endpoint, and Life Year Gain (LYG) as the effectiveness indicator.

We used recent systematic review he pooled sensitivity can be enhanced from 76.5 percent (pulse oximetry alone) to 92 percent (combined with physical examination). We used a total of 2,334 neonates with CCHD data for the economic model. Our analysis revealed that adding pulse oximetry to the routine neonatal physical examination leads to 2.34 of LYG and a cost difference of USD1,080,602, showing a ICER of KRW610,063,240 (USD461,857)/LYG.

Considering the benefit of LYG and cost of reducing the complications and after effects of newborns with CCHD who survived early diagnosis, it is considered to be worthwhile in Korea for a mandatory screening test.

Medical technologies are evolving rapidly, with many new and expensive technologies entering the market constantly, challenging the sustainability of the public healthcare system. Early health technology assessment (HTA) to inform subsidy decision for innovative medical technologies, before they diffuse into the public healthcare system, may drive appropriate early adoption or curtail inappropriate use. This abstract describes the Agency for Care Effectiveness (ACE)’s experience in conducting early HTAs and key challenges faced.

During ACE’s 2021 topic prioritization exercise, ACE took a proactive approach by considering medical technologies identified from horizon scanning (HS) for subsidy evaluation. Two topics were shortlisted from HS. Standard HTA evaluation framework and local clinician consultation were used to define the evaluation scope and clinical pathways. Literature search and appraisal were conducted for safety, effectiveness, and economic evidence. Budget impact estimations and organizational feasibility assessment were additional domains considered for subsidy decision-making by the Ministry of Health Medical Technology Advisory Committee (MTAC).

MTAC did not recommend subsidy for the two technologies due to weak evidence base, largely due to a lack of comparative evidence, small samples, short-term follow-ups, or heterogeneity of population. Additional considerations included potentially high budget impact or organizational feasibility issues such as substantial capital and maintenance cost and infrastructure reconfiguration required. During the evaluation, key challenges of assessing such technologies in their early diffusion within the healthcare system were: (i) differing clinical opinions on whether the technology meets an unmet need; (ii) uncertain place in the clinical management algorithm for the relevant indications; (iii) sparse and weak evidence; (iv) uncertain financial implications to the healthcare system due to a lack of available local costs.

Early HTA on medical technologies identified from HS can be a useful tool to guide subsidy decisions; however, several challenges exist. Careful selection of technologies and timing of evaluation are critical. Seeking stakeholder inputs earlier would ensure shortlisting appropriate technologies with greater clinical need for HTA.

The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the functioning of health systems, imposing the need for adaptations. Elective surgeries also needed to adapt, and research has shown higher mortality in newly infected surgical patients after or during procedures. Thus, was recommended the suspension of elective surgeries during the pandemic. Early studies evaluating the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on bariatric surgery have reported a substantial reduction in procedures performed.

This retrospective study evaluated the impact of the suspension of bariatric surgeries for a Brazilian Health Maintenance Organization: UNIMED-BH, based on the analysis of data from before and during the pandemic of COVID-19.

There were 2,641 bariatric procedures conducted in 2019 with a 14.1 percent reduction in volume to 2,314 procedures in 2020. In 2021, there were 2,813 bariatric procedures and 1,700 procedures were observed from January to August 2022. Therefore, it appears that in 2022 the demand for bariatric procedures will be similar to the year 2019, which was before the COVID-19 pandemic.

From the analysis of the data, a decrease in bariatric surgical volume was evidenced during the year 2020 when compared to 2019. Post-pandemic, monitoring is necessary to assess whether the system was able to meet the demand for bariatric surgical procedures.

Most new drugs have only clinical studies focused on a single population at the time of first registration, hence their indications for use are restricted to this population. For clinical conditions when there are no other treatments available, new drugs have higher costs in Brazil. There is no review of prices when these medications broaden their therapeutic areas, and this can have a significant financial impact. This study’s objective is to assess the financial implications of pembrolizumab’s incremental indication after its initial registration.

We calculated the annual cost to treat all Brazilian patients with indications for use in the first registration and all incremental indications of pembrolizumb. Populations were estimated by epidemiological data from the pembrolizumab clinical trials called, KEYNOTE studies, and the INCA 2023 cancer estimate for the Brazilian population. Costs were calculated by CMED-ANVISA price value and considering the dosing of 200mg every 3 weeks.

In 2016, pembrolizumab was granted registration in Brazil was restricted to patients with advanced melanoma. In 2022 the indication was expanded to more than 20 new indications, with several studies in progress that potentially will lead to further inclusions. The estimate of patients eligible for indications increase of 1,796 to 99,544 patients with an increased total cost from BRL625,802,837 to BRL34,685,366,192 (USD121,185,677.4 to USD6,716,763,399.04).

The financial burden of pembrolizumab’s expanded uses after it was first approved could significantly rise, endangering the long-term viability of healthcare systems. In Brazil, where medicine costs are not regularly monitored, the annual inflation adjustment is the only factor that causes prices to change. In order to lower medicine prices in response to the addition of new indications, the expansion of therapeutic options for the same condition, or even obsolescence, regulations are required.