Pub Date : 2026-02-23DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.012
Paolo Compagnucci, Henry D Huang, Marco Bergonti, Yari Valeri, Alessio Gasperetti, Marco Schiavone, María Cespón-Fernández, Kanae Hasegawa, Vincenzo Schillaci, Francesco Solimene, Laura Cipolletta, Quintino Parisi, Giovanni Volpato, László Gellér, Nándor Szegedi, Claudio Tondo, Andrea Sarkozy, Harikrishna Tandri, Michela Casella, William G Stevenson, Antonio Dello Russo
Background: A catheter platform allowing power- and temperature-controlled ablation (temperature-guided ablation) has recently been introduced. Clinical outcomes after ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation using this technology remain uncertain.
Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of temperature-guided VT ablation and compare the findings vs those from standard power-controlled ablation.
Methods: This multicenter cohort study enrolled consecutive patients undergoing temperature-guided VT ablation using the QDOT MICRO catheter (Biosense Webster) at 8 referral centers in Europe and the United States (2021-2024). For comparison, a multicenter cohort of patients receiving power-controlled ablation with the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH or SMARTTOUCH SurroundFlow (Biosense Webster) catheters was also included. The primary safety endpoint was procedure-related complications. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation recurrence during long-term follow-up, assessed in the overall cohort and in propensity score-matched patients.
Results: The study included 286 patients: 109 treated with temperature-guided ablation and 177 with power-controlled ablation. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was the predominant VT substrate (n = 125 [44%]); approximately one-half presented with electrical storm. Propensity score matching based on baseline clinical data yielded 101 pairs. Procedure-related complications were significantly lower with temperature-guided ablation (temperature-guided: n = 3 [3%]; power-controlled: n = 23 [13%]; P = 0.003), a result that remained significant after matching (temperature-guided: n = 3 [3%]; power-controlled: n = 12 [12%]; P = 0.028) and excluding vascular complications (temperature-guided: n = 1 [1%]; power-controlled: n = 14 [8%]; P = 0.012). Use of temperature-guided ablation was associated with lower odds of nonvascular complications in multivariable analysis (adjusted OR: 0.095; P = 0.028). Over a median follow-up of 24 months, VT/ventricular fibrillation recurrence rates were similar between groups in both overall (log-rank test, P = 0.570) and matched (log-rank test, P = 0.850) cohorts. Subgroup analyses showed no signal of heterogeneity.
Conclusions: In this multicenter VT ablation registry, a novel temperature-guided ablation modality showed favorable safety and efficacy relative to power-controlled ablation.
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Temperature-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Paolo Compagnucci, Henry D Huang, Marco Bergonti, Yari Valeri, Alessio Gasperetti, Marco Schiavone, María Cespón-Fernández, Kanae Hasegawa, Vincenzo Schillaci, Francesco Solimene, Laura Cipolletta, Quintino Parisi, Giovanni Volpato, László Gellér, Nándor Szegedi, Claudio Tondo, Andrea Sarkozy, Harikrishna Tandri, Michela Casella, William G Stevenson, Antonio Dello Russo","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A catheter platform allowing power- and temperature-controlled ablation (temperature-guided ablation) has recently been introduced. Clinical outcomes after ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation using this technology remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of temperature-guided VT ablation and compare the findings vs those from standard power-controlled ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter cohort study enrolled consecutive patients undergoing temperature-guided VT ablation using the QDOT MICRO catheter (Biosense Webster) at 8 referral centers in Europe and the United States (2021-2024). For comparison, a multicenter cohort of patients receiving power-controlled ablation with the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH or SMARTTOUCH SurroundFlow (Biosense Webster) catheters was also included. The primary safety endpoint was procedure-related complications. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation recurrence during long-term follow-up, assessed in the overall cohort and in propensity score-matched patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 286 patients: 109 treated with temperature-guided ablation and 177 with power-controlled ablation. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was the predominant VT substrate (n = 125 [44%]); approximately one-half presented with electrical storm. Propensity score matching based on baseline clinical data yielded 101 pairs. Procedure-related complications were significantly lower with temperature-guided ablation (temperature-guided: n = 3 [3%]; power-controlled: n = 23 [13%]; P = 0.003), a result that remained significant after matching (temperature-guided: n = 3 [3%]; power-controlled: n = 12 [12%]; P = 0.028) and excluding vascular complications (temperature-guided: n = 1 [1%]; power-controlled: n = 14 [8%]; P = 0.012). Use of temperature-guided ablation was associated with lower odds of nonvascular complications in multivariable analysis (adjusted OR: 0.095; P = 0.028). Over a median follow-up of 24 months, VT/ventricular fibrillation recurrence rates were similar between groups in both overall (log-rank test, P = 0.570) and matched (log-rank test, P = 0.850) cohorts. Subgroup analyses showed no signal of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this multicenter VT ablation registry, a novel temperature-guided ablation modality showed favorable safety and efficacy relative to power-controlled ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147306150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-23DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.002
Alireza Oraii, Arian Afzalian, Corentin Chaumont, Oriol Rodriguez-Queralto, Ting-Wei Ernie Liao, Mohamed M Gad, Syed Muhammad Mustafa Zaidi, Erica Zado, Cory M Tschabrunn, Balaram Krishna J Hanumanthu, Matthew C Hyman, Timothy M Markman, Gustavo Guandalini, Ramanan Kumareswaran, Rajat Deo, Michael P Riley, David Lin, Fermin C Garcia, Saman Nazarian, Gregory E Supple, Robert D Schaller, David S Frankel, David J Callans, Sanjay Dixit, Francis E Marchlinski
Background: Pulmonary veins (PVs) are major sources of atrial fibrillation (AF) triggers, but patients may also have non-PV (NPV) triggers. Data on the impact of targeting NPV triggers on AF ablation outcomes are limited.
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the outcome of patients undergoing AF ablation based on their NPV trigger status.
Methods: Patients undergoing first-time AF ablation using radiofrequency energy between 2018 and 2023 who received trigger provocative maneuvers were included. The provocative maneuvers consisted of cardioversion of AF, incremental isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 μg/min) and/or an atrial burst pacing protocol. NPV triggers were defined as ectopic foci initiating AF, sustained focal atrial tachycardia (AT), or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Recurrence was defined as AF/AT >30 seconds after a 90-day blanking period.
Results: Of 2,315 patients included, 2,046 (88.4%) did not have NPV triggers, 233 (10.1%) had NPV triggers that were ablated, and 36 (1.6%) had NPV triggers that were not targeted or failed localization/ablation attempts. One-year recurrence rate was 29.5% in patients without NPV triggers, 38.2% in those with ablated NPV triggers (adjusted HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.08-1.69), and 72.2% in those with untreated NPV triggers (adjusted HR: 3.71; 95% CI: 2.48-5.54). This response pattern remained consistent regardless of NPV trigger subtype (AF vs focal AT) or provocation method (spontaneous vs induced triggers).
Conclusions: Failure to ablate induced NPV triggers is associated with a high risk of recurrence. Although the ablation of NPV triggers reduces recurrence rates to levels approaching those without such triggers, their presence indicates a modestly worse prognosis.
{"title":"Role of Non-Pulmonary Vein Triggers in Outcomes of First-Time Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.","authors":"Alireza Oraii, Arian Afzalian, Corentin Chaumont, Oriol Rodriguez-Queralto, Ting-Wei Ernie Liao, Mohamed M Gad, Syed Muhammad Mustafa Zaidi, Erica Zado, Cory M Tschabrunn, Balaram Krishna J Hanumanthu, Matthew C Hyman, Timothy M Markman, Gustavo Guandalini, Ramanan Kumareswaran, Rajat Deo, Michael P Riley, David Lin, Fermin C Garcia, Saman Nazarian, Gregory E Supple, Robert D Schaller, David S Frankel, David J Callans, Sanjay Dixit, Francis E Marchlinski","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary veins (PVs) are major sources of atrial fibrillation (AF) triggers, but patients may also have non-PV (NPV) triggers. Data on the impact of targeting NPV triggers on AF ablation outcomes are limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the outcome of patients undergoing AF ablation based on their NPV trigger status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing first-time AF ablation using radiofrequency energy between 2018 and 2023 who received trigger provocative maneuvers were included. The provocative maneuvers consisted of cardioversion of AF, incremental isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 μg/min) and/or an atrial burst pacing protocol. NPV triggers were defined as ectopic foci initiating AF, sustained focal atrial tachycardia (AT), or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Recurrence was defined as AF/AT >30 seconds after a 90-day blanking period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,315 patients included, 2,046 (88.4%) did not have NPV triggers, 233 (10.1%) had NPV triggers that were ablated, and 36 (1.6%) had NPV triggers that were not targeted or failed localization/ablation attempts. One-year recurrence rate was 29.5% in patients without NPV triggers, 38.2% in those with ablated NPV triggers (adjusted HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.08-1.69), and 72.2% in those with untreated NPV triggers (adjusted HR: 3.71; 95% CI: 2.48-5.54). This response pattern remained consistent regardless of NPV trigger subtype (AF vs focal AT) or provocation method (spontaneous vs induced triggers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure to ablate induced NPV triggers is associated with a high risk of recurrence. Although the ablation of NPV triggers reduces recurrence rates to levels approaching those without such triggers, their presence indicates a modestly worse prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147306112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.029
Nino Isakadze, David D Spragg
{"title":"Beyond Recurrence: What Cluster Analysis of Postablation Symptoms Can (and Cannot) Tell Us.","authors":"Nino Isakadze, David D Spragg","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.029","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147365153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-18DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.030
Miloud Cherbi, Melvyn Dezecot, Pierre Groussin, Vincent Galand, Elena Efimova, Jackson Liang, Jacinthe Boulet, Paul Gautier, Clément Delmas, Raphael Martins
{"title":"Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device: Toward a Risk-Based Approach.","authors":"Miloud Cherbi, Melvyn Dezecot, Pierre Groussin, Vincent Galand, Elena Efimova, Jackson Liang, Jacinthe Boulet, Paul Gautier, Clément Delmas, Raphael Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147306013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-18DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.019
Dongyang Long, Fengqi Xuan, Fan Zhang, Shaobo Fan, Yingchuan Yan, Jie Zhang, Xin Zhang, Jun Ding, Wei Ma
{"title":"Trans-Right Pulmonary Artery Approach for Radiofrequency Ablation of Focal Atrial Tachycardia Arising From a Left Atrial Diverticulum.","authors":"Dongyang Long, Fengqi Xuan, Fan Zhang, Shaobo Fan, Yingchuan Yan, Jie Zhang, Xin Zhang, Jun Ding, Wei Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146258015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-18DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.015
Konstantinos C Siontis, Samuel J Asirvatham
{"title":"Cardiac Radiomodulation: A New Frontier for (Low-Dose) Cardiac Radiotherapy Targeting Neuro-Immune Remodeling.","authors":"Konstantinos C Siontis, Samuel J Asirvatham","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147306055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.003
Di Lang, Haibo Ni, Roman Y Medvedev, Fang Liu, Claudia P Alvarez-Baron, Leonid Tyan, Daniel G P Turner, Aleah Warden, Stefano Morotti, Thomas A Schrauth, Baron Chanda, Timothy J Kamp, Gail A Robertson, Eleonora Grandi, Alexey V Glukhov
Background: Caveolae are nanoscale, plasma membrane invaginations that compartmentalize ion channels and transporters, including those involved in sinoatrial node (SAN) activity. However, role of caveolae in cardiac pacemaking remains unknown.
Objectives: This study sought to determine the role of caveolae in SAN pacemaking and sinus node dysfunction (SND).
Methods: In vivo electrocardiography, ex vivo optical mapping, in vitro Ca2+ imaging, immunofluorescent and electron microscopy were performed in wild-type, cardiac-specific Cav3 knockout and 8-week post-myocardial infarction heart failure mice. Mouse and human donor SAN tissues were used for biochemical protein copurification studies. A novel 3-dimensional single SAN cell mathematical model was used to determine the impact of protein localization on SAN pacemaking.
Results: In both mouse and human SANs, caveolae compartmentalized HCN4, Cav1.2, Cav1.3, Cav3.1, and Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (NCX1) proteins within discrete pacemaker signalosomes via direct association with Cav3. This compartmentalization positioned electrogenic sarcolemmal proteins near the subsarcolemmal sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane and ensured fast and robust activation of NCX1 by subsarcolemmal local sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release events, which diffuse across ∼15-nm subsarcolemmal cleft. Disruption of caveolae led to the development of SND via suppression of pacemaker automaticity through a 50% decrease of the L-type Ca2+ current, a negative shift of the HCN current (If) activation curve, and a 40% reduction of NCX1 function, along with ∼2.3-times widening of the sarcolemma-sarcoplasmic reticulum distance. These changes significantly decreased the SAN depolarizing force, both during diastolic depolarization and upstroke phase, leading to bradycardia, sinus pauses, recurrent development of SAN quiescence, and significant increase in heart rate lability. Computational modeling, supported by biochemical studies, identified NCX1 redistribution to extracaveolar membrane as the primary mechanism of SAN pauses and quiescence due to the impaired ability of NCX1 to be effectively activated by local sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release events and trigger action potentials. Heart failure remodeling mirrored caveolae disruption leading to NCX1-local sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release event uncoupling and SND.
Conclusions: SAN pacemaking is driven by complex protein interactions within a nanoscale caveolar pacemaker signalosome. Disruption of caveolae leads to SND, demonstrating a new dimension of SAN remodeling and revealing a novel therapeutic target.
{"title":"Caveolar Compartmentalization of Pacemaker Signaling Ensures Stable Sinoatrial Rhythmicity Which Is Disrupted in Heart Failure.","authors":"Di Lang, Haibo Ni, Roman Y Medvedev, Fang Liu, Claudia P Alvarez-Baron, Leonid Tyan, Daniel G P Turner, Aleah Warden, Stefano Morotti, Thomas A Schrauth, Baron Chanda, Timothy J Kamp, Gail A Robertson, Eleonora Grandi, Alexey V Glukhov","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caveolae are nanoscale, plasma membrane invaginations that compartmentalize ion channels and transporters, including those involved in sinoatrial node (SAN) activity. However, role of caveolae in cardiac pacemaking remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study sought to determine the role of caveolae in SAN pacemaking and sinus node dysfunction (SND).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In vivo electrocardiography, ex vivo optical mapping, in vitro Ca<sup>2+</sup> imaging, immunofluorescent and electron microscopy were performed in wild-type, cardiac-specific Cav3 knockout and 8-week post-myocardial infarction heart failure mice. Mouse and human donor SAN tissues were used for biochemical protein copurification studies. A novel 3-dimensional single SAN cell mathematical model was used to determine the impact of protein localization on SAN pacemaking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both mouse and human SANs, caveolae compartmentalized HCN4, Ca<sub>v</sub>1.2, Ca<sub>v</sub>1.3, Ca<sub>v</sub>3.1, and Na<sup>+</sup>-Ca<sup>2+</sup> exchanger (NCX1) proteins within discrete pacemaker signalosomes via direct association with Cav3. This compartmentalization positioned electrogenic sarcolemmal proteins near the subsarcolemmal sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane and ensured fast and robust activation of NCX1 by subsarcolemmal local sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca<sup>2+</sup> release events, which diffuse across ∼15-nm subsarcolemmal cleft. Disruption of caveolae led to the development of SND via suppression of pacemaker automaticity through a 50% decrease of the L-type Ca<sup>2+</sup> current, a negative shift of the HCN current (I<sub>f</sub>) activation curve, and a 40% reduction of NCX1 function, along with ∼2.3-times widening of the sarcolemma-sarcoplasmic reticulum distance. These changes significantly decreased the SAN depolarizing force, both during diastolic depolarization and upstroke phase, leading to bradycardia, sinus pauses, recurrent development of SAN quiescence, and significant increase in heart rate lability. Computational modeling, supported by biochemical studies, identified NCX1 redistribution to extracaveolar membrane as the primary mechanism of SAN pauses and quiescence due to the impaired ability of NCX1 to be effectively activated by local sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca<sup>2+</sup> release events and trigger action potentials. Heart failure remodeling mirrored caveolae disruption leading to NCX1-local sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca<sup>2+</sup> release event uncoupling and SND.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SAN pacemaking is driven by complex protein interactions within a nanoscale caveolar pacemaker signalosome. Disruption of caveolae leads to SND, demonstrating a new dimension of SAN remodeling and revealing a novel therapeutic target.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12974990/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146226748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.008
Sandeep K Jain, William H Frick, Timothy W Smith
{"title":"Double Trouble: 2 Congenital Abnormalities.","authors":"Sandeep K Jain, William H Frick, Timothy W Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2026.01.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146226820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}