JACC. Clinical electrophysiology最新文献

Background: The coronary sinus is an arrhythmogenic structure that can initiate and maintain atrial fibrillation (AF). Coronary sinus ablation has been shown to be effective in prolonging the AF cycle length and terminating AF in patients with both paroxysmal and persistent AF who have persistent AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Objectives: The objective of this study was to undertake a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of coronary sinus isolation (CSI) as an adjunctive ablation strategy for the treatment of high-burden AF.

Methods: Consecutive patients presenting with symptomatic long episodes of paroxysmal AF (≥48 h but ≤7 days) or persistent AF (>7 days and ≤12 months) referred for first-time ablation were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either PVI, roofline ablation, and CSI (CSI group) or PVI and roofline ablation only (non-CSI group). Participants were assessed postprocedurally via clinical follow-up and 7-day Holter monitoring at regular intervals. The primary outcome was single-procedure drug-free atrial arrhythmia-free survival at 2 years.

Results: One hundred participants were recruited to the study; 48 were randomized to the CSI group and 52 to the non-CSI group. Acutely successful CSI was achieved in 45 of the 48 patients in the CSI group. At 2 years follow up, 30 of 48 patients (62.5%) in the CSI group and 33 of 52 (63.4%) in the non-CSI group were free from arrhythmia recurrence. Single-procedure drug-free survival at 2 years was no different between groups (P = 0.91). Similarly, multiple procedure drug assisted survival at 5 years was not different between groups (P = 0.80). Complication rates were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.19).

Conclusions: Adjunctive CSI as part of a de novo ablation strategy does not confer any additional benefit greater than PVI and roofline for the treatment of high-burden AF.

Background: Many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) have progressed from an initial paroxysmal phenotype; however, there are patients in whom atrial fibrillation (AF) is persistent at diagnosis. Relatively little is known about this subgroup, but prior observational studies have suggested these patients have worse outcomes with ablation.

Objectives: This study sought to: 1) assess demographic and electrophysiologic characteristics of patients with PsAF at first diagnosis compared with those with who have progressed from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); and 2) assess the impact of pattern of AF at diagnosis on recurrence post ablation.

Methods: CAPLA (Catheter Ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A Multicentre randomised trial of Pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] vs PVI with posterior Left Atrial wall isolation [PWI]) was a multicenter trial that randomized patients with PsAF to PVI plus PWI or PVI alone. Follow-up was 12 months. Outcomes were assessed after a 3-month blanking period.

Results: A total of 334 patients were included (median age 65.6 years, 23.1% female), 194 (58.1%) had PsAF at first AF diagnosis and 140 (41.9%) had PAF. Patients with PsAF at diagnosis were younger (age 64.0 vs 67.7 years, P = 0.005), had higher rates of heart failure (P < 0.001), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (54.5% IQR: 40-60 vs 60% IQR: 50-61, P = 0.007). AF recurrence occurred in 85 (43.8%) with PsAF at diagnosis and 70 (50%) with PAF at diagnosis. PsAF at diagnosis was not associated with risk of recurrence on univariable (HR: 0.802; 95% CI: 0.585-1.101; P = 0.173) or multivariable analysis (HR: 0.922; 95% CI: 0.647-1.312; P = 0.650). Median AF burden was 0% in both groups (P = 0.125). There was no difference in left atrial size (P = 0.337) or bipolar voltage (P = 0.579) between the groups.

Conclusions: In the CAPLA cohort of patients, pattern of AF at first diagnosis did not influence post-ablation rate of AF recurrence or AF burden. (Catheter Ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A Multicentre randomised trial of Pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] vs PVI with posterior Left Atrial wall isolation [PWI]; ACTRN12616001436460).

Background: TTN encodes a sarcomeric protein called titin. Pathogenic rare variants in TTN are the most common finding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and positive genetic testing.

Objectives: This study sought to define the characteristics and outcomes in patients with AF and pathogenic TTN variants compared with genotype-negative patients with AF.

Methods: Patients who presented initially with AF were enrolled in an AF registry. Retrospectively they underwent research sequencing for cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia genes. TTN(+) AF cases were defined as participants with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) rare variants located in exons with high cardiac expression. They were matched 1:2 with control subjects with no P/LP variants. Phenotyping used retrospective manual chart review.

Results: Among 2794 participants; 57 (2.0%) TTN(+) AF cases were identified and matched with 114 control subjects. Low QRS complex voltage was present more often in TTN(+) AF cases (18% vs 5%; P < 0.01), with no difference in PR, QRS interval, or QTc. More TTN(+) AF cases had persistent AF at enrollment (44% vs 30%; P = 0.028) and had undergone multiple cardioversions (61% vs. 37%; P < 0.01). By end of follow-up (median 8.3 years; Q1, Q3: 4.5, 13.7 years), 11% of TTN(+) AF cases developed sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, 44% left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <50%), and 47% met a combined endpoint of sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation or LV systolic dysfunction.

Conclusions: TTN(+) AF patients undergo more cardioversions and have more persistent forms of AF. Approximately 50% develop LV systolic dysfunction and/or malignant ventricular arrhythmias. These results highlight the need for diagnostic evaluation and management in TTN(+) patients beyond the usual care for AF.