Catheter ablation is a well-established and effective strategy for the management of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the identification and characterization of arrhythmogenic substrates for targeted ablation remain challenging. Electrogram abnormalities and responses to pacing during VT provide the classical and most validated methods to identify substrates. However, the 3-dimensional nature of the myocardium, nonconductive tissue, and heterogeneous strands of conductive tissue at the border zones or through the nonconductive zones can prohibit easy electrical sampling and identification of the tissue critical to VT. Intracardiac echocardiography is critical for identification of anatomy, examination of catheter approach and contact, assessment of tissue changes during ablation, and even potential substrates as echogenic regions, but lacks specificity with regard to the latter compared with advanced modalities. In recent decades, cardiac magnetic resonance, computed tomography and positron emission tomography have emerged as valuable tools in the periprocedural evaluation of VT ablation. Cardiac magnetic resonance has unparalleled soft tissue and temporal resolution and excels at identification of expanded interstitial space caused by myocardial infarction, fibrosis, inflammation, or infiltrative myopathies. Computed tomography has excellent spatial resolution and is optimal for identification of anatomic variabilities including wall thickness, thrombus, and lipomatous metaplasia. Positron emission tomography excels at identification of substrates including amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, and other inflammatory substrates. These imaging modalities are vital for assessing arrhythmogenic substrates, guiding optimal access strategy, and assessing ablation efficacy. Although clearly beneficial in specific settings, further clinical trials are needed to enhance generalizability and optimize integration of cardiac imaging for VT ablation.
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号