Japanese journal of clinical oncology最新文献

The standard treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ became well established through the results of several valuable clinical trials, and its therapeutic benefits have now come to be taken for granted. Ductal carcinoma in situ has an extremely good prognosis with the current treatment approach, with a 10-year breast cancer-specific survival rate of 97-98%. According to one retrospective cohort study, the breast cancer-specific survival rate of patients with low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ does not differ significantly between patients undergoing and not undergoing surgery. Some patients with ductal carcinoma in situ are not at a risk of progression to invasive cancer, but the predictors of such progression have not yet been clearly identified. Therefore, the same therapeutic strategies have been used to treat ductal carcinoma in situ and under the assumption that they have risks of invasive breast cancer, and a well-balanced risk/benefit ratio in respect of treatment has not yet been achieved. Based on the results of several recent clinical trials aimed at ensuring provision of a well-balanced treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ which carries a good prognosis, de-escalation of postoperative adjuvant therapy has now begun. Currently, not only is the optimization of postoperative adjuvant therapy accelerating, but also clinical trials to de-escalate basic surgical treatments are under way. There is a possibility of achieving individualized treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with reduced treatment intervention. In this review, we present an overview of the current treatment approaches and potential future management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Background: This study aimed to investigate what treatment are selected for malignant brain tumors, particularly glioblastoma (GBM) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), in real-world Japan and the costs involved.

Methods: We conducted a questionnaire survey regarding treatment selections for newly diagnosed GBM and PCNSL treated between July 2021 and June 2022 among 47 institutions in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Brain Tumor Study Group. We calculated the total cost and cost per month of the initial therapy for newly diagnosed GBM or PCNSL.

Results: The most used regimen (46.8%) for GBM in patients aged ≤74 years was 'Surgery + radiotherapy concomitant with temozolomide'. This regimen's total cost was 7.50 million JPY (Japanese yen). Adding carmustine wafer implantation (used in 15.0%), TTFields (used in 14.1%), and bevacizumab (BEV) (used in 14.5%) to the standard treatment of GBM increased the cost by 1.24 million JPY for initial treatment, and 1.44 and 0.22 million JPY per month, respectively. Regarding PCNSL, 'Surgery (biopsy) + rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine (R-MPV) therapy' was the most used regimen (42.5%) for patients of all ages. This regimen incurred 1.07 million JPY per month. The three PCNSL regimens based on R-MPV therapy were in ultra-high-cost medical care (exceeding 1 million JPY per month).

Conclusions: Treatment of malignant brain tumors is generally expensive, and cost-ineffective treatments such as BEV are frequently used. We believe that the results of this study can be used to design future economic health studies examining the cost-effectiveness of malignant brain tumors.

Background: Although treatment outcomes for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have dramatically improved over the past few decades, drug costs have also significantly increased. This study aimed to investigate which first-line treatment regimens for mCRC are actually used (frequency) in Japanese practice and at what cost.

Methods: We collected data on patients with mCRC who received first-line treatment at 37 institutions of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Colorectal Cancer Study Group from July 2021 to June 2022, and calculated the cost of regimens. The cost per month of each regimen was estimated based on standard usage, assuming a patient with a weight of 70 kg and a body surface area of 1.8 m2. We categorized the regimens into very high-cost (≥1 000 000 Japanese yen [JPY]/month), high-cost (≥500 000 JPY/month), and others (<500 000 JPY/month).

Results: The study included 1880 participants, 24% of whom were ≥ 75 years. Molecular targeted containing regimens were received by 78% of the patients. The most frequently used regimen was the doublet regimen (fluoropyrimidine with either oxaliplatin or irinotecan) plus bevacizumab (43%), followed by doublet plus cetuximab or panitumumab (21%). The cost of molecular targeted drugs-containing regimens (ranging from 85 406 to 843 602 JPY/month) is much higher than that of only cytotoxic drug regimens (ranging from 17 672 to 51 004 JPY/month). About 16% received high-cost treatments that included panitumumab-containing regimens and pembrolizumab (17% of patients aged ≤74 years and 11% of patients aged ≥75 years).

Conclusion: About 16% of mCRC patients received first-line treatment with regimens costing >500 000JPY/month, and molecular targeted drugs being the main drivers of cost.

Background: Over the last decade, novel anticancer drugs have improved the prognosis for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RM-SCCHN). However, this has increased healthcare expenditures and placed a heavy burden on patients and society. This study investigated the frequency of use and costs of select palliative chemotherapy regimens in Japan.

Methods: From July 2021 to June 2022 in 54 healthcare facilities, we gathered data of patients diagnosed with RM-SCCHN and who had started first-line palliative chemotherapy with one of eight commonly used regimens. Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinomas were excluded. The number of patients receiving each regimen and the costs of each regimen for the first month and per year were tallied.

Results: The sample comprised 907 patients (674 were < 75 years old, 233 were ≥ 75 years old). 330 (36.4%) received Pembrolizumab monotherapy, and 202 (22.3%) received Nivolumab monotherapy. Over 90% of patients were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Treatment regimens' first-month costs were 612 851-849 241 Japanese yen (JPY). The cost of standard palliative chemotherapy until 2012 was about 20 000 JPY per month. The incremental cost over the past decade is approximately 600 000-800 000 JPY per month, a 30- to 40-fold increase in the cost of palliative chemotherapy for RM-SCCHN.

Conclusion: First-line palliative chemotherapy for RM-SCCHN exceeds 600 000 JPY monthly. Over the last decade, the prognosis for RM-SCCHN has improved, but the costs of palliative chemotherapy have surged, placing a heavy burden on patients and society.

Background: Although pulmonary metastasectomy is a commonly-performed procedure, data are lacking on the feasibility and oncological efficacy of removal of pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer. In this study, we retrospectively compared features of pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer versus colorectal cancer (CRC, patients with CRC being common candidates for pulmonary metastasectomy) and outcomes of removing such metastases, with our aim being to identify specific features of the former.

Methods: Data on removal of 182 pulmonary metastases (29 from pancreatic and 153 from CRC) performed from January 2013 to April 2024 were included in this analysis. Radio-pathological findings were compared between these groups. The study cohort comprised 139 pulmonary metastasectomies in 119 patients (24 with pancreatic cancer and 95 with CRC) in whom R0 resection was achieved and follow-up data were available.

Results: Atypical radiological findings of pulmonary metastases, including polygonal-shape (P < 0.001), spiculae (P < 0.001), air bronchogram (P = 0.012), peripheral ground-glass opacities (P < 0.001), and pleural tags (P < 0.001) were present more frequently in metastases from pancreatic cancer than from CRC. Furthermore, pleural lavage cytology was more frequently positive in pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer than in those from CRC (P < 0.001). Disease-free survival was significantly shorter after the removal of metastases from pancreatic than from CRC (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Some pulmonary metastases from pancreatic cancer have atypical radiological features. Surgical interventions for these may enable diagnosis. The prognosis is significantly poorer after removing metastases from pancreatic cancer than from CRC. The therapeutic significance of our findings requires further investigation.

Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a common and distressing condition among adolescents and young adults (AYAs). This study aims to investigate the efficacy of digital interventions, including distress screening-based information provision and smartphone problem-solving therapy, on common psychological distress, especially FCR, in AYA patients with cancer. Participants will be 224 AYA outpatients with cancer aged 15-39 years who will be randomly assigned to either an 8-week smartphone-based intervention or a waitlist control group. This intervention includes smartphone-based distress screening, information provision, and psychotherapy (problem-solving therapy). The primary endpoint will be the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form score at week 8. This study will be conducted as a fully decentralized, randomized, and multicenter trial. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nagoya City University on 19 April 2024 (ID: 46-23-0005). Trial registration: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000054583.

Background: Clear cell sarcoma is rare, so no reports have previously characterized its national profiles. We examined the nationwide epidemiology and clinical outcomes of patients with clear cell sarcoma based on the National Cancer Registry in Japan.

Methods: Overall, 23 522 patients with soft tissue sarcoma-entered in the National Cancer Registry in 2016-2019 using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition cancer topography and morphology codes-were enrolled in either the clear cell or the non-clear cell sarcoma group. Data extracted included: demographics (sex and age), tumor details (reason for diagnosis, tumor location, histology and stage), hospital volume and facility type, treatment and prognosis for each patient.

Results: Of 23 522 soft tissue sarcoma patients, 122 were enrolled in the clear cell sarcoma group and 23 400 in the non-clear cell sarcoma group. The incidence of clear cell sarcoma was 0.52% of all soft tissue sarcoma, with an age-adjusted incidence of 0.024/100 000/year. The age at diagnosis was significantly younger, and more tumors were at the localized stage in the clear cell than the non-clear cell sarcoma group. In addition, the overall survival in the clear cell group was worse than in the non-clear cell group (P < 0.001). Of 122 patients with clear cell sarcoma, the localized stage, surgical treatment and treatment without chemotherapy were associated with better overall survival in the univariate analyses.

Conclusions: The present study is the first to have clarified the epidemiology, clinical features, treatment, prognosis and significant factors affecting the prognosis of patients with clear cell sarcoma in Japan.

Background: Urinary dysfunction is an adverse event of low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in patients with prostate cancer. We aimed to examine the time to α-1 adrenergic antagonist withdrawal after LDR-BT initiation.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 1663 patients who underwent LDR-BT at our hospital during 2004-2022.

Results: Overall, 1485/1663 (89.3%) patients were able to stop using α-1 adrenergic antagonists, 1111 (66.8%) of them within 1 year of LDR-BT. Risk factors for prolonged time to withdrawal were age ≥70 years, taking agents for lower urinary tract symptoms prior to LDR-BT, an International Prostate Symptom Score ≥8, an Overactive Bladder Symptom Score ≥3 and a residual urine volume ≥20 ml. Of the patients who were able to stop taking α-1 adrenergic antagonists, 357/1485 (24.0%) required resumption, 218 (61.1%) of whom did so between 1 and 3 years after LDR-BT. This period matched the period of transient worsening of the urinary symptom score. Finally, multivariable analysis identified supplemental external beam radiotherapy and an Overactive Bladder Symptom Score ≥3 as independent risk factors for α-1 adrenergic antagonist resumption.

Conclusions: Withdrawal of α-1 adrenergic antagonists was possible in 66.8% of patients within 1 year of LDR-BT. Our results suggest that patients who are older or have pre-treatment LUTS may have prolonged deterioration of urinary dysfunction after treatment. Resumption of α-1 adrenergic antagonists 1-3 years after treatment may be associated with urinary symptom flares, and close attention is necessary for patients with supplemental external beam radiotherapy and a high pretreatment Overactive Bladder Symptom Score.

Objective: To investigate the opioid prescription status around clinical events among patients with breast cancer in Japan using a comprehensive claims database.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Database (April 2009-March 2020). The target patients had a first breast cancer diagnosis in April 2010 or later. The percentages of patients prescribed opioids before and after surgery, before and after bone metastasis, and before death with a breast cancer diagnosis in the same month were analyzed by month and by clinical facility characteristics and location.

Results: We identified 1 085 388 target patients, including 216 503, 72 645, and 70 832 patients with data for the events of surgery, bone metastasis, and death, respectively. The percentage of patients prescribed opioids in the month of surgery was the highest of the entire study period at ≥70%. The percentage of patients prescribed opioids increased before bone metastasis, peaked 1 month later, and decreased thereafter while remaining higher than that before the event. The percentage of patients who were prescribed opioids before death increased over time, peaking at 33.4% 1 month before death. Prescriptions differed by facility characteristics and facility location around surgery; no differences by facility characteristics, including location, were noted around the other events. The percentage of patients prescribed opioids was consistently lower than that reported in other countries for all events.

Conclusions: We showed the opioid prescription status around clinical events, including some distinct patterns depending on facility characteristics for the period around surgery, among patients with breast cancer in Japan.

Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a recognized complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. However, the risk of HBV reactivation with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains uncertain due to their exclusion from clinical trials. This study aimed to assess the incidence of HBV reactivation in patients with cancer undergoing ICI therapy, exploring associated risk factors.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with cancer who tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). The primary endpoint was incidence of HBV reactivation, whereas the secondary endpoint was occurrence of hepatic adverse events during ICI therapy.

Results: Among the 162 eligible patients (median age 59 years; 85.8% men), HBV reactivation occurred in 4.3% at a median of 13 weeks post-treatment initiation. At baseline, HBV DNA was undetectable in 78 patients; 88 received antiviral prophylaxis, while 74 patients did not. Reactivation rates were 3.5% in HBsAg-positive and 10% in hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive individuals, with an overall rate of 4.3%. These rates were 1.1% with prophylaxis and 8.1% without. Twenty-two patients had grade 3-4 hepatitis, and 25 tested HBsAg-negative but HBcAb-positive. No HBV-related fatalities occurred. The absence of antiviral treatment was a significant risk factor for HBV reactivation.

Conclusions: Our study underscores the risk of HBV reactivation in patients with cancer undergoing ICI therapy, especially among those lacking antiviral prophylaxis. Regular HBV DNA testing and antiviral prophylaxis are crucial preventive measures for HBV reactivation. These findings emphasize the importance of monitoring HBV status in patients receiving ICIs.