Objective: To identify pretreatment factors associated with developing primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and tumor-related factors in patients with advanced RCC who initiated nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy between January 2018 and July 2021. Primary resistance was defined as radiographic or clinical progression within 3 months of treatment initiation. Cases with suspected pseudoprogression were excluded.
Results: Eighty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria; 23 exhibited primary resistance. Univariate analysis identified the following significant predictive factors: body mass index (P = .006), lymph node metastasis (P = .021), sarcomatoid differentiation (P = .035), solitary metastatic organ (P = .051), liver metastasis (P = .056), and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P = .094). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined an LDH cutoff value of 174 U/L, which was significantly associated with primary resistance (P = .029). Considering the number of primary resistance cases, multivariable analysis incorporated three candidate variables (lymph node metastasis, sarcomatoid differentiation, and LDH ≥ 174 U/L) and identified sarcomatoid differentiation (odds ratio, 4.264; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.299-14.825; P = .017) and LDH ≥ 174 U/L (odds ratio, 3.634; 95% CI, 1.143-13.770; P = .028) as independent predictors of primary resistance.
Conclusions: Sarcomatoid differentiation on pretreatment biopsy or elevated serum LDH before treatment initiation may predict primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy in patients with advanced RCC. Alternative regimens should be considered in such cases, particularly for patients who are likely to experience rapid disease progression or for whom the occurrence of P-res is not clinically acceptable.
{"title":"Pretreatment predictive factors for primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter collaborative study.","authors":"Kimihiko Masui, Naoki Hayata, Toshinari Yamasaki, Takahiro Yamaguchi, Toru Kanno, Noriyuki Ito, Koji Yoshimura, Satoru Masui, Takehiko Segawa, Sojun Kanamaru, Kazuhiro Okumura, Hiroyuki Onishi, Yasumasa Shichiri, Satoshi Ishitoya, Takayuki Sumiyoshi, Yuki Kita, Takayuki Goto, Takashi Kobayashi, Atsuro Sawada","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf197","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify pretreatment factors associated with developing primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and tumor-related factors in patients with advanced RCC who initiated nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy between January 2018 and July 2021. Primary resistance was defined as radiographic or clinical progression within 3 months of treatment initiation. Cases with suspected pseudoprogression were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria; 23 exhibited primary resistance. Univariate analysis identified the following significant predictive factors: body mass index (P = .006), lymph node metastasis (P = .021), sarcomatoid differentiation (P = .035), solitary metastatic organ (P = .051), liver metastasis (P = .056), and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P = .094). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined an LDH cutoff value of 174 U/L, which was significantly associated with primary resistance (P = .029). Considering the number of primary resistance cases, multivariable analysis incorporated three candidate variables (lymph node metastasis, sarcomatoid differentiation, and LDH ≥ 174 U/L) and identified sarcomatoid differentiation (odds ratio, 4.264; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.299-14.825; P = .017) and LDH ≥ 174 U/L (odds ratio, 3.634; 95% CI, 1.143-13.770; P = .028) as independent predictors of primary resistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sarcomatoid differentiation on pretreatment biopsy or elevated serum LDH before treatment initiation may predict primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy in patients with advanced RCC. Alternative regimens should be considered in such cases, particularly for patients who are likely to experience rapid disease progression or for whom the occurrence of P-res is not clinically acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yuanyuan Yang, Weihao Ma, Hongbo Fu, Yanqiong Zhou, Yan Lin
Objective: Dasatinib was approved for treating pediatric patients with philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia and philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. While its efficacy has been proven, comprehensive safety data in pediatric populations remain limited. This study utilizes data from the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS) to evaluate and characterize adverse events (AEs) reported in pediatric patients treated with dasatinib.
Methods: Data from the FAERS between 2014 Q1 and 2024 Q4 were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis was performed to identify AEs reported in pediatric patients treated with dasatinib.
Results: A total of 382 pediatric cases involving dasatinib were reported. The most frequent system organ classes included general disorders and administration site conditions, injury, poisoning, and procedural complications, and gastrointestinal disorders. Notably, previously unreported AEs such as hemorrhagic enterocolitis, lymphoid tissue hyperplasia, hydrocephalus, and hemorrhagic cystitis were identified, raising potential new safety concerns. Additionally, instances of off-label use were observed, particularly in regions where dasatinib is not recommended for pediatric patients, underscoring the importance of vigilant AEs monitoring to ensure patient safety.
Conclusion: This study highlights the need for enhanced pharmacovigilance and proactive monitoring in pediatric patients receiving dasatinib to ensure treatment safety and improve clinical outcomes, and provides supporting evidence for the safe use of dasatinib in pediatric populations.
{"title":"Safety profiles of dasatinib in pediatric patients: a real-world pharmacovigilance assessment based on the FAERS database.","authors":"Yuanyuan Yang, Weihao Ma, Hongbo Fu, Yanqiong Zhou, Yan Lin","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf154","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf154","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dasatinib was approved for treating pediatric patients with philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia and philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. While its efficacy has been proven, comprehensive safety data in pediatric populations remain limited. This study utilizes data from the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS) to evaluate and characterize adverse events (AEs) reported in pediatric patients treated with dasatinib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the FAERS between 2014 Q1 and 2024 Q4 were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis was performed to identify AEs reported in pediatric patients treated with dasatinib.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 382 pediatric cases involving dasatinib were reported. The most frequent system organ classes included general disorders and administration site conditions, injury, poisoning, and procedural complications, and gastrointestinal disorders. Notably, previously unreported AEs such as hemorrhagic enterocolitis, lymphoid tissue hyperplasia, hydrocephalus, and hemorrhagic cystitis were identified, raising potential new safety concerns. Additionally, instances of off-label use were observed, particularly in regions where dasatinib is not recommended for pediatric patients, underscoring the importance of vigilant AEs monitoring to ensure patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the need for enhanced pharmacovigilance and proactive monitoring in pediatric patients receiving dasatinib to ensure treatment safety and improve clinical outcomes, and provides supporting evidence for the safe use of dasatinib in pediatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":"40-47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12784361/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145212357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Postmastectomy radiation Therapy (PMRT) reduces locoregional recurrence (LRR) and breast cancer mortality in patients with ≥4 positive lymph nodes. However, evidence supporting PMRT in patients with 1-3 positive nodes remains limited. While the 2014 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) meta-analysis demonstrated benefit in this population, the constituent trials preceded current standard practices including sentinel lymph node biopsy, contemporary systemic therapies, and modern radiation therapy techniques. This analysis examines the applicability of EBCTCG findings to current clinical practice. Historical trials reported elevated LRR rates, potentially attributable to inadequate axillary staging and suboptimal systemic therapy regimens such as cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. Contemporary studies demonstrate substantially lower LRR rates in comparable patients managed without PMRT, particularly those with favorable tumor characteristics. Current adjuvant therapies-including anthracyclines, taxanes, trastuzumab, endocrine agents, and targeted therapies such as abemaciclib and olaparib-have markedly reduced recurrence risk. Retrospective analyses yield conflicting results regarding PMRT efficacy, while randomized trials (SUPREMO, TAILOR RT) seek to refine treatment indications. Contemporary practice should not universally recommend PMRT for intermediate-risk patients (1-3 nodes); instead, individualized risk assessment is warranted. The role of PMRT remains undefined in patients without axillary lymph node dissection or those achieving pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical decision-making must consider treatment benefits relative to potential late toxicities and reconstructive complications. Personalized, evidence-based approaches informed by emerging trial data represent the optimal strategy for patient management.
{"title":"Individualized risk stratification for postmastectomy radiation therapy in node-positive breast cancer: moving beyond universal guidelines.","authors":"Akimitsu Yamada, Kazutaka Narui, Takashi Ishikawa, Itaru Endo","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf153","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf153","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postmastectomy radiation Therapy (PMRT) reduces locoregional recurrence (LRR) and breast cancer mortality in patients with ≥4 positive lymph nodes. However, evidence supporting PMRT in patients with 1-3 positive nodes remains limited. While the 2014 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) meta-analysis demonstrated benefit in this population, the constituent trials preceded current standard practices including sentinel lymph node biopsy, contemporary systemic therapies, and modern radiation therapy techniques. This analysis examines the applicability of EBCTCG findings to current clinical practice. Historical trials reported elevated LRR rates, potentially attributable to inadequate axillary staging and suboptimal systemic therapy regimens such as cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. Contemporary studies demonstrate substantially lower LRR rates in comparable patients managed without PMRT, particularly those with favorable tumor characteristics. Current adjuvant therapies-including anthracyclines, taxanes, trastuzumab, endocrine agents, and targeted therapies such as abemaciclib and olaparib-have markedly reduced recurrence risk. Retrospective analyses yield conflicting results regarding PMRT efficacy, while randomized trials (SUPREMO, TAILOR RT) seek to refine treatment indications. Contemporary practice should not universally recommend PMRT for intermediate-risk patients (1-3 nodes); instead, individualized risk assessment is warranted. The role of PMRT remains undefined in patients without axillary lymph node dissection or those achieving pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical decision-making must consider treatment benefits relative to potential late toxicities and reconstructive complications. Personalized, evidence-based approaches informed by emerging trial data represent the optimal strategy for patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145258252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a malignant type of bone and soft tissue tumor with EWSR1-ETS gene fusions as the primary driver alteration. Incidence is higher in White populations compared to Black and Asian populations. Researchers use next-generation sequencing to identify alterations as potential therapeutic targets. We compared the data from the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets in the USA with the data from Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics in Japan.
Methods: We sequenced tumor DNA from 81 ES samples using the FoundationOne® CDx for multigene panel testing. Genetic alterations were interpreted via the Cancer Knowledge Database (CKDB) and potentially actionable alterations were classified into levels A-F.
Results: Analysis of 81 ES samples revealed 556 mutations in 197 genes and 126 copy-number alterations in 58 genes. Potentially actionable alterations were detected in 10 patients (12.3%) at CKDB levels A or C. STAG2 mutations accounted for 3.7%, TP53 mutations for 17.3%, and CDKN2A deletions for 13.6%. There was no significant difference in overall survival after genomic profiling test enrollment for STAG2 and TP53 mutations (P = .663 and P = .767), but those with CDKN2A and CDKN2B deletions had poor prognosis (P = .024 and P = .012).
Conclusion: Compared to previous reports, Japanese ES cases showed lower STAG2 and higher TP53 mutation frequencies. CDKN2A and CDKN2B deletions may serve as prognostic biomarkers indicating unfavorable outcomes.
背景:尤文氏肉瘤(Ewing sarcoma, ES)是一种以EWSR1-ETS基因融合为主要驱动基因改变的骨和软组织恶性肿瘤。与黑人和亚洲人相比,白人的发病率更高。研究人员使用下一代测序技术来识别潜在的治疗靶点。我们比较了来自美国Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated mutations Profiling of onable Cancer Targets的数据与来自日本癌症基因组学和高级治疗中心的数据。方法:使用FoundationOne®CDx对81例ES样本进行肿瘤DNA测序,进行多基因面板检测。通过癌症知识数据库(CKDB)解释遗传改变,并将潜在的可操作改变分为A-F级。结果:81份ES样本分析发现197个基因556个突变,58个基因126个拷贝数改变。在CKDB水平A或c的10例患者(12.3%)中检测到潜在可操作的改变。STAG2突变占3.7%,TP53突变占17.3%,CDKN2A缺失占13.6%。STAG2和TP53基因突变组患者的总生存率无统计学差异(P = 0.663和0.767),而CDKN2A和CDKN2B基因缺失组患者预后较差(P = 0.024和P = 0.012)。结论:与以往报道相比,日本ES病例STAG2较低,TP53突变频率较高。CDKN2A和CDKN2B缺失可作为预后不良的生物标志物。
{"title":"Analysis of comprehensive genomic profiling test for Ewing sarcoma in pediatric patients and adults using the nationwide clinical and genomic database in Japan.","authors":"Satoshi Kamio, Koichi Ogura, Yoshiyuki Suehara, Rina Kitada, Masachika Ikegami, Kuniko Sunami, Takafumi Koyama, Noboru Yamamoto, Seiji Shimomura, Hiroya Kondo, Toshiyuki Takemori, Shuhei Osaki, Eisuke Kobayashi, Shintaro Iwata, Shinji Kohsaka, Akira Kawai","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf174","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a malignant type of bone and soft tissue tumor with EWSR1-ETS gene fusions as the primary driver alteration. Incidence is higher in White populations compared to Black and Asian populations. Researchers use next-generation sequencing to identify alterations as potential therapeutic targets. We compared the data from the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets in the USA with the data from Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sequenced tumor DNA from 81 ES samples using the FoundationOne® CDx for multigene panel testing. Genetic alterations were interpreted via the Cancer Knowledge Database (CKDB) and potentially actionable alterations were classified into levels A-F.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 81 ES samples revealed 556 mutations in 197 genes and 126 copy-number alterations in 58 genes. Potentially actionable alterations were detected in 10 patients (12.3%) at CKDB levels A or C. STAG2 mutations accounted for 3.7%, TP53 mutations for 17.3%, and CDKN2A deletions for 13.6%. There was no significant difference in overall survival after genomic profiling test enrollment for STAG2 and TP53 mutations (P = .663 and P = .767), but those with CDKN2A and CDKN2B deletions had poor prognosis (P = .024 and P = .012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to previous reports, Japanese ES cases showed lower STAG2 and higher TP53 mutation frequencies. CDKN2A and CDKN2B deletions may serve as prognostic biomarkers indicating unfavorable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":"33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145481227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Age-standardized mortality-to-incidence ratio for bladder cancer in the world.","authors":"Laureline Gatellier, Kayo Nakata","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf201","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":"56 1","pages":"115-116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The impact of the starting dose of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) following combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors with TKIs (i.e. IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical data from 155 patients treated with first-line IO-TKI for RCC. Patients were categorized into full-dose and reduced-dose groups based on their starting dose of TKIs. Effectiveness and safety profiles were compared between groups.
Results: A reduced starting dose was administered to 52 patients (34%). These patients were older (P = 0.0137) and received pembrolizumab plus axitinib more frequently, while lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was less used (P = 0.0258) compared to the full-dose group. Progression-free survival and overall survival did not significantly differ between the full-dose and reduced-dose groups (P = 0.202 and P = 0.309, respectively). Although the objective response rate appeared higher in the full-dose group, the difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for other covariates (P = 0.0588). Safety profiles were comparable, with no significant differences in TKI dose reduction, drug interruption or discontinuation, or glucocorticoids use (P > 0.05). However, adverse events of grade ≥3 were more frequent in the full-dose group, although not statistically significant (P = 0.121).
Conclusion: The starting dose of TKIs did not significantly impact clinical outcomes following IO-TKI for RCC. These findings suggest a potential for the optimization of the starting dose of TKIs; however, prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
{"title":"Impact of starting dose of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on outcomes following combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma.","authors":"Hiroki Ishihara, Koichi Nishimura, Yuki Nemoto, Shinsuke Mizoguchi, Takayuki Nakayama, Hironori Fukuda, Hiroaki Shimmura, Yasunobu Hashimoto, Kazuhiko Yoshida, Junpei Iizuka, Tsunenori Kondo, Toshio Takagi","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf152","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of the starting dose of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) following combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors with TKIs (i.e. IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated clinical data from 155 patients treated with first-line IO-TKI for RCC. Patients were categorized into full-dose and reduced-dose groups based on their starting dose of TKIs. Effectiveness and safety profiles were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A reduced starting dose was administered to 52 patients (34%). These patients were older (P = 0.0137) and received pembrolizumab plus axitinib more frequently, while lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was less used (P = 0.0258) compared to the full-dose group. Progression-free survival and overall survival did not significantly differ between the full-dose and reduced-dose groups (P = 0.202 and P = 0.309, respectively). Although the objective response rate appeared higher in the full-dose group, the difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for other covariates (P = 0.0588). Safety profiles were comparable, with no significant differences in TKI dose reduction, drug interruption or discontinuation, or glucocorticoids use (P > 0.05). However, adverse events of grade ≥3 were more frequent in the full-dose group, although not statistically significant (P = 0.121).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The starting dose of TKIs did not significantly impact clinical outcomes following IO-TKI for RCC. These findings suggest a potential for the optimization of the starting dose of TKIs; however, prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":"73-79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145191758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The ARASENS trial demonstrated a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for a triplet regimen in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). We aimed to determine whether this benefit is synergistic or additive. Using a mathematical model of independent drug action and published data from the ARASENS and ARANOTE, we compared the observed OS of the triplet regimen to a predicted OS curve. Reconstructed individual patient data were compared using a Cox model. The observed OS was statistically superior to the predicted OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99; P = .047), indicating a clinical benefit ~18% greater than the expected additive effect. To address confounding by subsequent therapies, we analyzed time to initial subsequent anticancer therapy, which showed an even more pronounced greater-than-additive benefit (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44-0.74; P < .001). These findings suggest the triplet regimen provides an early therapeutic advantage that exceeds additive expectations, supporting an upfront combination strategy in mCSPC.
ARASENS试验表明,在转移性去势敏感前列腺癌(mCSPC)中,三联疗法具有显著的总生存期(OS)获益。我们的目的是确定这种益处是协同的还是附加的。利用独立药物作用的数学模型和ARASENS和ARANOTE公布的数据,我们将三联用药方案的观察OS与预测OS曲线进行了比较。重建的个体患者数据使用Cox模型进行比较。观察到的OS在统计学上优于预测OS(风险比[HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99; P = 0.047),表明临床获益比预期的加性效应大18%。为了解决后续治疗的混淆问题,我们分析了开始后续抗癌治疗的时间,结果显示比加性治疗更明显的益处(HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44-0.74; P
{"title":"Evaluating synergistic versus additive effects of the triplet regimen in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a modeling analysis.","authors":"Shinro Hata, Shuntaro Suzuki, Hiroyuki Fujinami, Naoyuki Yamanaka, Toshitaka Shin","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ARASENS trial demonstrated a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for a triplet regimen in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). We aimed to determine whether this benefit is synergistic or additive. Using a mathematical model of independent drug action and published data from the ARASENS and ARANOTE, we compared the observed OS of the triplet regimen to a predicted OS curve. Reconstructed individual patient data were compared using a Cox model. The observed OS was statistically superior to the predicted OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99; P = .047), indicating a clinical benefit ~18% greater than the expected additive effect. To address confounding by subsequent therapies, we analyzed time to initial subsequent anticancer therapy, which showed an even more pronounced greater-than-additive benefit (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44-0.74; P < .001). These findings suggest the triplet regimen provides an early therapeutic advantage that exceeds additive expectations, supporting an upfront combination strategy in mCSPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: This article aims to describe the newly developed Japanese practice guidelines for psychological distress of adult individuals with cancer who have elevated levels of psychological distress.
Methods: We conducted systematic reviews and Delphi consensus rounds to determine the levels of certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation.
Results: In our proposed flow of care, all individuals with cancer should initially be provided with general support, comprising supportive communication, detection of psychological distress, attendance to their needs, and differentiating physical conditions that mimic psychological distress. If a patient still has significant psychological distress despite such support, more specific care for psychological distress should be considered. Collaborative care has strong evidence base and is strongly recommended. Evidence for psychotherapy for psychological distress and fear of cancer recurrence is moderate to strong, however, recommendations for these interventions were weakened because of the heterogeneity of interventions and lack of formal training system. Evidence of pharmacotherapy was weak. Thus, anxiolytics are weakly recommended only for short term and should be accompanied with psychosocial support. Antidepressants are weakly recommended when a patient is diagnosed with depression. Early specialized palliative care, care for caregivers and peer support are not recommended as a sole means to alleviate psychological distress, due to the scarce supporting evidence. Provision of these interventions is not hindered when they aim to improve the outcomes other than psychological distress, such as quality of life, symptom burden and self-efficacy.
Discussion: New practice guidelines for psychological distress of adult individuals with cancer have been developed.
{"title":"JPOS/JASCC clinical guidelines for psychological distress in adult cancer patients: a summary of recommendations.","authors":"Daisuke Fujisawa, Eisho Yoshikawa, Maiko Fujimori, Sachiko Arai, Makoto Kobayakawa, Akiko Kurata, Ayako Kayano, Kanako Ichikura, Yuri Igarashi, Hiroyuki Otani, Yuko Yanai, Tomoko Baba, Yoshiro Okajima, Akiko Abe, Yu Uneno, Masako Okamura, Yoshihisa Matsumoto, Kurumi Asaumi, Kazuho Hisamura, Kanae Momino, Emi Takeuchi, Atsushi Sato, Noriko Tamura, Akiko Imai, Ryoichi Sadahiro, Toru Okuyama","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This article aims to describe the newly developed Japanese practice guidelines for psychological distress of adult individuals with cancer who have elevated levels of psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted systematic reviews and Delphi consensus rounds to determine the levels of certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our proposed flow of care, all individuals with cancer should initially be provided with general support, comprising supportive communication, detection of psychological distress, attendance to their needs, and differentiating physical conditions that mimic psychological distress. If a patient still has significant psychological distress despite such support, more specific care for psychological distress should be considered. Collaborative care has strong evidence base and is strongly recommended. Evidence for psychotherapy for psychological distress and fear of cancer recurrence is moderate to strong, however, recommendations for these interventions were weakened because of the heterogeneity of interventions and lack of formal training system. Evidence of pharmacotherapy was weak. Thus, anxiolytics are weakly recommended only for short term and should be accompanied with psychosocial support. Antidepressants are weakly recommended when a patient is diagnosed with depression. Early specialized palliative care, care for caregivers and peer support are not recommended as a sole means to alleviate psychological distress, due to the scarce supporting evidence. Provision of these interventions is not hindered when they aim to improve the outcomes other than psychological distress, such as quality of life, symptom burden and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>New practice guidelines for psychological distress of adult individuals with cancer have been developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that patients with hematological malignancies (HM) exhibit significantly impaired humoral immune responses after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Although booster doses and cellular immune responses have been increasingly studied, few analyses have concurrently evaluated both humoral and cellular immunity in patients receiving bendamustine, bispecific antibodies, or CAR-T therapies. We aimed to assess the humoral immunogenicity, T-cell immune response, and booster effect after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with B-cell lymphoma undergoing immunochemotherapy or novel agent treatment.
Methods: Serum antibodies to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein (S-IgG) were measured after the second and booster (third) mRNA vaccinations, and specific T-cell responses were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot method.
Results: Forty-six of 114 patients (40%) acquired antibodies. Age < 65 years (odds ratio 8.99) and CD19 ≥ 50/μL (odds ratio 19.7) were independent predictors of response. To support the selection of this threshold, operating characteristic curve analysis was performed and confirmed CD19 ≥ 50/μL as a clinically meaningful discriminator despite a lower statistical cutoff. Even in some patients who did not develop antibodies, T-cell responses were observed (36% after two doses; 45.5% after the booster). The booster vaccine enhanced antibody (40% to 62.9%) and T-cell (47.2% to 57.6%) responses.
Conclusions: This study provides confirmatory real-world evidence that CD19 recovery is a key determinant of humoral response, while vaccine-induced T-cell immunity may be preserved even in antibody-nonresponders, supporting continued vaccination efforts in this high-risk population.
{"title":"Humoral and T-cell immune responses to coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies.","authors":"Haruhi Makino, Suguru Fukuhara, Keiji Okinaka, Maki Shibata, Daiki Hattori, Hirokazu Sasaki, Shinichi Makita, Noriko Iwaki, Wataru Munakata, Shigehiro Yagishita, Mika Shiotsuka, Osamu Kobayashi, Masatoshi Yanagida, Yasuhiro Irino, Akinobu Hamada, Noboru Yamamoto, Yasushi Goto, Koji Izutsu, Yuki Katsuya","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf207","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies have demonstrated that patients with hematological malignancies (HM) exhibit significantly impaired humoral immune responses after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Although booster doses and cellular immune responses have been increasingly studied, few analyses have concurrently evaluated both humoral and cellular immunity in patients receiving bendamustine, bispecific antibodies, or CAR-T therapies. We aimed to assess the humoral immunogenicity, T-cell immune response, and booster effect after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with B-cell lymphoma undergoing immunochemotherapy or novel agent treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum antibodies to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein (S-IgG) were measured after the second and booster (third) mRNA vaccinations, and specific T-cell responses were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six of 114 patients (40%) acquired antibodies. Age < 65 years (odds ratio 8.99) and CD19 ≥ 50/μL (odds ratio 19.7) were independent predictors of response. To support the selection of this threshold, operating characteristic curve analysis was performed and confirmed CD19 ≥ 50/μL as a clinically meaningful discriminator despite a lower statistical cutoff. Even in some patients who did not develop antibodies, T-cell responses were observed (36% after two doses; 45.5% after the booster). The booster vaccine enhanced antibody (40% to 62.9%) and T-cell (47.2% to 57.6%) responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides confirmatory real-world evidence that CD19 recovery is a key determinant of humoral response, while vaccine-induced T-cell immunity may be preserved even in antibody-nonresponders, supporting continued vaccination efforts in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare malignant tumor of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. In this study, we aimed to analyze ONB cases registered in the nationwide Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan.
Methods: Among 90 885 head and neck cancer registrations (2011-19), we identified 346 patients with ONB. We summarized demographics, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, and treatment modalities (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) and compared patterns between an early (2011-15) and a late (2016-19) period. Survival was analyzed in 95 patients with standardized 5-year outcomes available.
Results: T4 lesions were frequent, and 234 patients (67.6%) received surgery-based treatment, typically combined with postoperative radiotherapy. Over time, endoscopic approaches increased markedly and became predominant over open skull base surgery. Among the 95 patients with evaluable follow-up, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 85.1% and 62.7%, respectively. Patients <60 years old and female patients exhibited better OS compared to younger patients and males. Postoperative radiotherapy was associated with improved RFS but not OS. Chemotherapy was used more often with open skull base surgery than with other surgical approaches.
Conclusions: Endoscopic surgery for ONB rose substantially, while younger age and female sex were associated with better OS, and postoperative radiotherapy was correlated with improved RFS.
{"title":"Nationwide analysis of olfactory neuroblastoma in Japan: evolving treatment approaches and prognostic outcomes.","authors":"Mariko Sekimizu, Takuya Mikoshiba, Ryoto Nagai, Naoaki Ishikawa, Takashi Okada, Megumi Kitayama, Daisuke Kawakita, Ken-Ichi Nibu, Seiichi Yoshimoto, Hiroyuki Ozawa","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare malignant tumor of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. In this study, we aimed to analyze ONB cases registered in the nationwide Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 90 885 head and neck cancer registrations (2011-19), we identified 346 patients with ONB. We summarized demographics, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, and treatment modalities (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) and compared patterns between an early (2011-15) and a late (2016-19) period. Survival was analyzed in 95 patients with standardized 5-year outcomes available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T4 lesions were frequent, and 234 patients (67.6%) received surgery-based treatment, typically combined with postoperative radiotherapy. Over time, endoscopic approaches increased markedly and became predominant over open skull base surgery. Among the 95 patients with evaluable follow-up, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 85.1% and 62.7%, respectively. Patients <60 years old and female patients exhibited better OS compared to younger patients and males. Postoperative radiotherapy was associated with improved RFS but not OS. Chemotherapy was used more often with open skull base surgery than with other surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic surgery for ONB rose substantially, while younger age and female sex were associated with better OS, and postoperative radiotherapy was correlated with improved RFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145833811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}