Japanese journal of clinical oncology最新文献

Background: Molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been developed for various malignant diseases, thereby improving clinical outcomes. However, these drugs are expensive, and few studies have assessed their actual use and costs in Japan. This study aimed to survey the use and costs of first-line chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer (AGC) in real-world settings.

Methods: The survey included patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type2 (HER2)-negative AGC who initiated first-line chemotherapy from January 2022 to December 2022 at the participating 92 institutions in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Data on the regimens were collected using Google Forms. A regimen that costs >500 000 Japanese yen (JPY) per month was defined as expensive.

Results: Data on chemotherapy regimens were collected from 2173 patients at all 92 institutions between March 2023 and May 2023. We analyzed 2113 patients who underwent the chemotherapy with recommended regimens and conditionally recommended regimens according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines sixth edition. The expensive regimens were triplet chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine (S-1 or capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil/levofolinate), oxaliplatin, and nivolumab. Their monthly costs ranged from 767 648 to 771 046 JPY. Nivolumab-containing regimens cost more than 20 times the price of conventional chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin. These regimens were used in 1416 (67%) of 2113 patients: in 71% of patients aged ≤74 years and in 59% of patients aged ≥75 years.

Conclusion: The regimens with >20-fold cost of conventional chemotherapy were used as first-line chemotherapy in two-thirds of patients and more than half even in the elderly population with HER2-negative AGC. This finding is important for future health economic studies on drug cost-efficacy.

Background: This study aimed to investigate what treatment are selected for malignant brain tumors, particularly glioblastoma (GBM) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), in real-world Japan and the costs involved.

Methods: We conducted a questionnaire survey regarding treatment selections for newly diagnosed GBM and PCNSL treated between July 2021 and June 2022 among 47 institutions in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Brain Tumor Study Group. We calculated the total cost and cost per month of the initial therapy for newly diagnosed GBM or PCNSL.

Results: The most used regimen (46.8%) for GBM in patients aged ≤74 years was 'Surgery + radiotherapy concomitant with temozolomide'. This regimen's total cost was 7.50 million JPY (Japanese yen). Adding carmustine wafer implantation (used in 15.0%), TTFields (used in 14.1%), and bevacizumab (BEV) (used in 14.5%) to the standard treatment of GBM increased the cost by 1.24 million JPY for initial treatment, and 1.44 and 0.22 million JPY per month, respectively. Regarding PCNSL, 'Surgery (biopsy) + rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine (R-MPV) therapy' was the most used regimen (42.5%) for patients of all ages. This regimen incurred 1.07 million JPY per month. The three PCNSL regimens based on R-MPV therapy were in ultra-high-cost medical care (exceeding 1 million JPY per month).

Conclusions: Treatment of malignant brain tumors is generally expensive, and cost-ineffective treatments such as BEV are frequently used. We believe that the results of this study can be used to design future economic health studies examining the cost-effectiveness of malignant brain tumors.

Background: Advanced (Stage IV) prostate and renal cancer have poor prognosis, and several therapies have been developed, but many are very costly. This study investigated drug regimens used in patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma and calculated the monthly cost of each.

Methods: We surveyed first-line drugs administered to patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cancer at Japan Clinical Oncology Group affiliated centers from April 2022 to March 2023. Drug costs were calculated according to drug prices in September 2023. Individual drug costs were calculated or converted to 28-day costs.

Results: A total of 700 patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer were surveyed. Androgen deprivation therapy + androgen receptor signaling inhibitor was the most common regimen (56%). The cost of androgen deprivation therapy + androgen receptor signaling inhibitor was 10.6-30.8-fold compared with conventional treatments. A total of 137 patients with Stage IV renal cancer were surveyed. Among them, 91% of patients received immune-oncology drug-based regimen. All patients received treatments with a monthly cost of ≥500 000 Japanese yen, and 80.4% of patients received treatments with a monthly cost of ≥1 million Japanese yen, of combination treatments. The cost of immune-oncology drug-based regimen was 1.2-3.1-fold that of TKI alone.

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a survey of first-line drug therapy in untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma stratified by age and treatment costs. Our results show that most Japanese patients received state-of-the-art, effective treatments with high financial burden.

Stomatitis, which is a common side effect of chemotherapy, currently lacks a standardized approach for its prevention. Therefore, this multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled phase III trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a dexamethasone-based mouthwash for preventing chemotherapy-induced stomatitis in patients with early breast cancer. We will randomly assign 230 patients with early breast cancer scheduled to receive chemotherapy in a 1:1 ratio to either the dexamethasone-based mouthwash group (10 ml, 0.1 mg/ml; swish for 2 min and spit 4 times daily for 8 weeks) or the mouthwash-with-tap-water group. The incidence of stomatitis, measured using electronic patient-reported outcomes, is the primary endpoint.

Objective: To evaluate the additive effect of naldemedine tosylate (naldemedine) on opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients insufficiently responding to magnesium oxide treatment.

Methods: We combined two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb and III trials of naldemedine and conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis. We evaluated the effect and safety of naldemedine in 116 patients who received naldemedine in addition to magnesium oxide (naldemedine group) and 117 patients who received placebo in addition to magnesium oxide (placebo group). Both groups included patients insufficiently responding to magnesium oxide for opioid-induced constipation. Effect was assessed using spontaneous bowel movement responder rate, complete spontaneous bowel movement responder rate, changes in spontaneous bowel movements and complete spontaneous bowel movements. Safety was also assessed.

Results: During the 2-week treatment period, the responder rates for spontaneous bowel movement and complete spontaneous bowel movement were 73.3 and 43.1% in naldemedine group, respectively, which were significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than 41.9 and 14.5% in placebo group, respectively. Median time to first spontaneous bowel movement and first complete spontaneous bowel movement was significantly shorter (P < 0.0001) in the naldemedine group (4.0 and 21.3 h, respectively) than in the placebo group (27.7 and 211.7 h, respectively). The incidence of adverse events and diarrhoea was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the naldemedine group than in the placebo group, while the incidence of serious adverse events and severe diarrhoea was not significantly different between the naldemedine and placebo groups.

Conclusion: The study suggested the addition of naldemedine as an effective treatment option for opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients insufficiently responding to magnesium oxide treatment.

Background: There is an increased risk of acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia when treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. There is no standard optimal treatment regimen for patients with lung cancer complicated with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carboplatin (CBDCA), bevacizumab (Bmab) and weekly paclitaxel (PXT) in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia.

Methods: This phase 2 study involved chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Patients received CBDCA (area under the curve: 5 on day 1), PXT (70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15) and Bmab (15 mg/kg on day 1) every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate.

Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled between January 2013 and October 2018 and received at least one course of the protocol treatment. The study was terminated before enrolling the planned number of patients because of poor accrual. The median patient age was 69 (range: 62-79) years, and 19 (90.5%) patients were men. The overall response rate was 61.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.4-81.9), meeting the primary endpoint. The median progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and overall survival were 9.69 (95% CI, 5.78-11.63), 8.21 (95% CI, 3.75-11.63) and 20.93 (95% CI, 13.17-29.83) months, respectively. There was no acute exacerbation or treatment-related death during protocol treatment.

Conclusion: The results indicate that patients with advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia could be effectively and safely treated using a combination of CBDCA, PXT and Bmab.

Objective: This study evaluated the short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy versus open surgery in obese patients (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2) with locally advanced colon cancer to ascertain the non-inferiority of laparoscopic surgery to open surgery.

Methods: In this large cohort study (UMIN-ID: UMIN000033529), we retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery for pathological stage II-III colon cancer between 2009 and 2013. A comparative analysis was performed after propensity score matching between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. The primary endpoint was the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS).

Results: We identified 1575 eligible patients from 46 institutions. Each group comprised 526 propensity score-matched patients. Comparing the laparoscopic versus open surgery group, laparoscopic surgery was significantly associated with increased median operating time (225 vs. 192.5 min; P < .0001) and decreased median estimated blood loss (20 vs. 140 ml; P < .0001). Lymph node retrieval (20 vs. 19; P = 0.4392) and postoperative complications (4.6% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.4851) were similar, postoperative hospital stay was shorter (10 vs. 12 days; P < .0001), and the 3-year RFS rates were similar (82.8 vs. 81.2%). The hazard ratio (HR) for relapse-free survival for laparoscopic versus open surgery was 0.927 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.747-1.150, one-sided P for non-inferiority = .001), indicating that for obese patients with colon cancer, laparoscopic surgery was non-inferior to open surgery.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery in obese patients with colon cancer offers advantages in terms of short-term outcomes and no disadvantages in terms of long-term outcomes.