Japanese journal of clinical oncology最新文献

Background: Although recent advances in systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have led to prolonged patient survival, the high costs of the drugs place a heavy burden on both patients and society. The objectives of this study were to examine the treatment regimens used as first-line systemic treatment for patients with advanced HCC in Japan and to estimate the treatment costs per regimen.

Methods: For this study, we aggregated the data of patients who had received first-line systemic treatment for advanced HCC between July 2021 and June 2022. The treatment cost per month of each regimen was estimated based on standard usage, assuming an average weight of 60 kg for male patients. The data were categorized by the treatment regimen, and the treatments were categorized based on the cost into very high-cost (≥1 000 000 Japanese yen [JPY]/month), high-cost (≥500 000 JPY/month) and other (<500 000 JPY/month) treatments.

Results: Of the total of 552 patients from 24 institutions whose data were analyzed in this study, 439 (79.5%) received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 98 (17.8%) received lenvatinib and 15 (2.7%) received sorafenib as the first-line treatment. The treatment cost per month for each of the above regimens was as follows: atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 1 176 284 JPY; lenvatinib, 362 295 JPY and sorafenib, 571 644 JPY. In total, 82.2% of patients received high-cost regimens, and the majority of these patients received a very high-cost regimen of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Conclusions: Advances in systemic therapies for HCC have led to prolonged patient survival. However, the treatment costs are also increasing, imposing a burden on both the patients and society.

Background: Advanced (Stage IV) prostate and renal cancer have poor prognosis, and several therapies have been developed, but many are very costly. This study investigated drug regimens used in patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma and calculated the monthly cost of each.

Methods: We surveyed first-line drugs administered to patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cancer at Japan Clinical Oncology Group affiliated centers from April 2022 to March 2023. Drug costs were calculated according to drug prices in September 2023. Individual drug costs were calculated or converted to 28-day costs.

Results: A total of 700 patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer were surveyed. Androgen deprivation therapy + androgen receptor signaling inhibitor was the most common regimen (56%). The cost of androgen deprivation therapy + androgen receptor signaling inhibitor was 10.6-30.8-fold compared with conventional treatments. A total of 137 patients with Stage IV renal cancer were surveyed. Among them, 91% of patients received immune-oncology drug-based regimen. All patients received treatments with a monthly cost of ≥500 000 Japanese yen, and 80.4% of patients received treatments with a monthly cost of ≥1 million Japanese yen, of combination treatments. The cost of immune-oncology drug-based regimen was 1.2-3.1-fold that of TKI alone.

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a survey of first-line drug therapy in untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma stratified by age and treatment costs. Our results show that most Japanese patients received state-of-the-art, effective treatments with high financial burden.

Objectives: We sought clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors for overall survival of retroperitoneal sarcoma in Japan.

Methods: A Japanese hospital-based cancer registry database with a pivotal 10-year follow-up was used to identify and enroll patients, registered from 106 institutions, diagnosed with retroperitoneal sarcoma in 2008-2009. Treating hospitals were divided by hospital care volume; high-volume hospitals and low-volume hospitals were defined as ≥ 4 and < 4 cases/year, respectively.

Results: A total of 91 men and 97 women were included, with a median age of 64 years. The most common histological type was liposarcoma in 101 patients, followed by leiomyosarcoma in 38 patients. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 44.1 and 28.3%. The majority of patients (n = 152, 80.9%) were treated at low-volume hospitals. High-volume hospital patients had higher 10-year overall survival rates than low-volume hospital patients (51.2% vs 23.2%, P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis revealed age over 60 years, treatment in low-volume hospitals and chemotherapy were independent predictors of unfavorable survival while treatment with surgery was an independent predictor of favorable survival.

Conclusions: The possibility of surgical removal was suggested to be the most important prognostic factor for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Better survival was shown in patients treated at high-volume hospitals in our series.

Background: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has various histological types and is rare, making it difficult to evaluate the malignancy of each histological type. Thus, comprehensive histological grading is most important in the pathological examination of STS. The Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) grading system is most commonly used in daily pathological analysis of STS. Among the FNCLCC grading system parameters, mitotic count is a key morphological parameter reflecting the proliferative activity of tumor cells, although its reproducibility may be lacking. Here, we compared the prognostic utility of the conventional and modified FNCLCC grading systems in JCOG1306.

Methods: We analyzed 140 patients with non-small round cell sarcoma. We performed Ki-67 immunostaining using open biopsy specimens before preoperative chemotherapy in all patients. We assessed histological grade in individual cases by conventional FNCLCC grading (tumor differentiation, mitotic count, and necrosis) and modified FNCLCC grading using the Ki-67 labeling index instead of mitotic count. We conducted univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses to investigate the influence of grade on overall survival.

Results: In univariable analysis, prognosis was worse for patients with conventional FNCLCC Grade 3 tumors compared with Grade 1 or 2 tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 4.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-12.05, P = 0.008). Moreover, prognosis was worse in patients with modified FNCLCC Grade 3 tumors compared with Grade 1 or 2 tumors (HR 4.90, 95% CI 1.64-14.65, P = 0.004). In multivariable analysis including both conventional and modified FNCLCC grading, the modified grading more strongly affected overall survival (HR 6.70, 95% CI 1.58-28.40, P = 0.010).

Conclusions: The modified FNCLCC grading system was superior to the conventional system in predicting the prognosis of patients with non-small round cell sarcoma according to this supplementary analysis of data from the randomized controlled trial JCOG1306.

Background: Major guidelines consistently recommend 5 years of postoperative surveillance for patients with colorectal cancer. However, they differ in their recommendations for examination intervals and whether they should vary according to disease stage. Furthermore, there are no reports on the cost-effectiveness of the different surveillance schedules. The objective of this study is to identify the most cost-effective surveillance intervals after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Methods: A total of 3701 patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer at the National Cancer Center Hospital were included. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for the five surveillance strategies with reference to the guidelines. Expected medical costs and quality-adjusted life years after colorectal cancer resection were calculated using a state-transition model by Monte Carlo simulation. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life years gained was calculated for each strategy, with a maximum acceptable value of 43 500-52 200 USD (5-6 million JPY).

Results: Stages I, II and III included 1316, 1082 and 1303 patients, respectively, with 45, 140 and 338 relapsed cases. For patients with stage I disease, strategy 4 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $26 555/quality-adjusted life year) was considered to be the most cost-effective, while strategies 3 ($83 071/quality-adjusted life year) and 2 ($289 642/quality-adjusted life year) exceeded the threshold value. In stages II and III, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for strategy 3 was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $18 358-22 230/quality-adjusted life year.

Conclusions: In stage I, the cost-effectiveness of intensive surveillance is very poor and strategy 4 is the most cost-effective. Strategy 3 is the most cost-effective in stages II and III.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are a general term for lymphocytes or immune cells infiltrating the tumor microenvironment. Numerous studies have demonstrated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to be robust prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors, which directly target tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, have become part of standard of care treatment for triple-negative breast cancer. Surprisingly, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes quantified by conventional methods do not predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, which highlights the heterogeneity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the complexity of the immune network in the tumor microenvironment. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are composed of diverse immune cell populations, including cytotoxic CD8-positive T lymphocytes, B cells and myeloid cells. Traditionally, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in tumor stroma have been evaluated by histology. However, the standardization of this approach is limited, necessitating the use of various novel technologies to elucidate the heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment. This review outlines the evaluation methods for tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from conventional pathological approaches that evaluate intratumoral and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes such as immunohistochemistry, to the more recent advancements in computer tissue imaging using artificial intelligence, flow cytometry sorting and multi-omics analyses using high-throughput assays to estimate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from bulk tumor using immune signatures or deconvolution tools. We also discuss higher resolution technologies that enable the analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes heterogeneity such as single-cell analysis and spatial transcriptomics. As we approach the era of personalized medicine, it is important for clinicians to understand these technologies.

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of frailty and its effects on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life among patients with prostate cancer.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, questionnaires were administered to 254 outpatients who visited the Department of Urology at Kagawa University Hospital for prostate cancer; finally, 108 outpatients were analyzed. Frailty, cancer-related fatigue and quality of life were assessed using the G8 screening tool, Japanese version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory and Japanese version of the Short Form 8 Health Survey, respectively. We defined frailty based on a score ≤14 points and divided the patients into frailty and no-frailty groups. We also compared the severity of cancer-related fatigue and quality of life between groups.

Results: The prevalence of frailty among 108 outpatients was 63%. Older age correlated with frailty severity (P = 0.0007) but not cancer-related fatigue severity (P = 0.2391). The proportion of patients on treatment or with metastasis was not significantly different between groups. The frailty group had higher cancer-related fatigue severity (P = 0.004) and decreased levels of general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work and enjoyment of life, especially on the Brief Fatigue Inventory subscale. The frailty group had lower physical and mental quality of life than the no-frailty group or general population.

Conclusions: The frailty rate for these patients increased with age, exceeding 60% regardless of the treatment status, and was associated with worsened cancer-related fatigue severity and reduced quality of life. Our study highlights the importance of assessing frailty when selecting treatment, especially in older patients.

Background: Streptozocin has been used to treat neuroendocrine tumors in Europe and the USA; however, its actual status in Japan has not been fully clarified owing to the rarity of this disease and the relatively recent approval of streptozocin in Japan.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who were treated with streptozocin-based chemotherapy at two Japanese hospitals between January 2004 and June 2023.

Results: The overall response and disease control rates were 27.7 and 74.5%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.1 and 20.3 months, respectively. Performance status ≥1 showed a significant negative correlation with progression-free survival, and performance status ≥1 and liver tumor burden ≥25% showed a significant negative correlation with overall survival. No significant differences were observed in the treatment response between pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed; however, 87.7% of patients expressed a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, which negatively correlated with the duration of streptozocin treatment (r = 0.43, P = 0.0020). In the streptozocin re-administration group (n = 5), no differences were found in efficacy between the initial and second streptozocin treatments.

Conclusions: Although streptozocin is a safe, streptozocin-induced renal dysfunction is a dilemma in streptozocin responders. Streptozocin may benefit patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, especially those with a good performance status; however, in some cases, planned streptozocin withdrawal or switching to other drugs should be considered.

Background: Due to the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer, prompt initiation of treatment is critical. We investigated the effect of the interval between cancer diagnosis and initiation of chemotherapy on survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods: In this retrospective, single-centre study, consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer between April 2013 and March 2022 were analyzed. Data were extracted from the electronic medical records of patients who received chemotherapy for metastatic, locally advanced or resectable pancreatic cancer or who received chemotherapy due to either being intolerant of or declining surgery. We compared overall survival between two groups: the early waiting time group (waiting time ≤30 days from diagnosis to chemotherapy initiation) and the elective waiting time group (waiting time ≥31 days). Prognostic factors, including biliary drainage, were considered. The impact of waiting time on survival was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses with Cox proportional hazard models. A 1:1 propensity score matching approach was used to balance bias, accounting for significant poor prognosis factors, age and sex.

Results: The study involved 137 patients. Overall survival exhibited no statistically significant difference between the early and elective waiting time groups (207 and 261 days, P = 0.2518). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified poor performance status and metastasis presence as predictors of worse prognosis. This finding persisted post propensity score matching (275 and 222 days, P = 0.8223).

Conclusions: Our study revealed that initiating chemotherapy ˃30 days later does not significantly affect treatment efficacy compared to within 30 days of diagnosis.