首页 > 最新文献

JAMA cardiology最新文献

英文 中文
Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry. 经导管主动脉瓣置换术结果的趋势:来自 STS/ACC TVT 注册的启示。
IF 24 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3453
Suzanne V Arnold,Pratik Manandhar,Sreekanth Vemulapalli,Andrzej S Kosinski,Wayne B Batchelor,Vinod H Thourani,Michael J Mack,David J Cohen
ImportanceAlthough transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes in the US have improved substantially since 2011, it is unknown whether these trends have continued since 2019.ObjectiveTo examine changes in risk-adjusted TAVR outcomes from 2019 to 2022 and to examine any noteworthy trends over time.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study examined data from patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with TAVR at 786 US hospitals between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2022, included in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Transcatheter Valve Therapies (TVT) Registry.ExposurePatients who underwent TAVR.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day composite adverse events. To understand factors explaining these trends, a series of logistic regression models was constructed for each outcome, with time as the primary explanatory variable. After adjusting for changing patent characteristics and procedural factors, a series of exploratory analyses was performed to examine the extent to which these findings could be explained by several plausible hypotheses.ResultsThis study's analytic cohort included a total of 210 495 patients. Median (IQR) patient age was 79 (73-85) years, and 91 313 patients (43.4%) were female. Median (IQR) STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) was 3.3% (2.0%-5.3%). There were no significant changes in unadjusted 30-day mortality from quarter 1 of 2019 (2.4%) to the end of quarter 1 of 2022 (2.2%) (P for trend = .10), with an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for time of 0.98 per year (95% CI, 0.94-1.01). After adjusting for patient characteristics, the OR increased to 1.05 per year (95% CI, 1.02-1.08), which increased further after adjusting for procedural characteristics to 1.09 per year (95% CI, 1.05-1.13). In exploratory analyses, there were no meaningful changes in the adjusted odds of death after excluding sites that entered the STS/ACC TVT Registry in 2019 or later (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.13), low-volume sites (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.06-1.13), low-risk patients (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15), patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.13), in-hospital deaths (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14), or patients who experienced a major vascular complication (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this observational cohort study performing a national analysis of outcomes after TAVR, it was found that risk-adjusted 30-day mortality increased modestly from January 2019 to March 2022. However, no site-level, patient-related, or process-related factors were identified that could explain these findings. Although the absolute increase in risk-adjusted mortality during the study period was relatively small, these findings warrant continued surveillance.
重要性虽然美国的经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)结果自2011年以来有了大幅改善,但这些趋势自2019年以来是否持续还不得而知。目的研究2019年至2022年风险调整后TAVR结果的变化,并研究随时间推移的任何值得注意的趋势。设计、设置和参与者这项队列研究检查了2019年1月1日至2022年3月31日期间在美国786家医院接受TAVR治疗的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的数据,这些患者被纳入了胸外科医师学会(STS)/美国心脏病学会(ACC)经导管瓣膜治疗(TVT)登记处。主要结果和测量指标主要结果是30天死亡率,次要结果是院内死亡率和30天综合不良事件。为了解解释这些趋势的因素,针对每项结果建立了一系列逻辑回归模型,并将时间作为主要解释变量。在对不断变化的专利特征和手术因素进行调整后,进行了一系列探索性分析,以研究这些结果在多大程度上可以用几个看似合理的假设来解释。患者年龄中位数(IQR)为 79(73-85)岁,女性患者为 91 313 人(43.4%)。STS预测死亡风险(PROM)中位数(IQR)为3.3%(2.0%-5.3%)。从 2019 年第 1 季度(2.4%)到 2022 年第 1 季度末(2.2%),未经调整的 30 天死亡率没有明显变化(趋势 P = 0.10),未经调整的时间比(OR)为每年 0.98(95% CI,0.94-1.01)。调整患者特征后,OR 升至每年 1.05(95% CI,1.02-1.08),调整手术特征后,OR 进一步升至每年 1.09(95% CI,1.05-1.13)。在探索性分析中,在排除2019年或之后加入STS/ACC TVT注册的医疗机构(OR,1.09;95% CI,1.05-1.13)、低容量医疗机构(OR,1.09;95% CI,1.06-1.13)、低风险患者(OR,1.11;95% CI,1.07-1.15)、双主动脉瓣患者(OR,1.09;95% CI,1.05-1.13)、院内死亡(OR,1.09;95% CI,1.05-1.13)、主动脉瓣关闭不全(OR,1.09;95% CI,1.07-1.15)、主动脉瓣狭窄(OR,1.09;95% CI,1.07-1.15)、主动脉瓣关闭不全(OR,1.09;95% CI,1.06-1.13)后,调整后的死亡几率没有明显变化。13)、院内死亡(OR,1.08;95% CI,1.03-1.14)或出现主要血管并发症的患者(OR,1.09;95% CI,1.05-1.12)。结论和相关性在这项对 TAVR 术后结果进行全国性分析的观察性队列研究中发现,从 2019 年 1 月到 2022 年 3 月,风险调整后的 30 天死亡率略有增加。但是,没有发现任何可解释这些结果的部位、患者或流程相关因素。虽然研究期间风险调整后死亡率的绝对增长幅度相对较小,但这些结果值得继续监测。
{"title":"Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.","authors":"Suzanne V Arnold,Pratik Manandhar,Sreekanth Vemulapalli,Andrzej S Kosinski,Wayne B Batchelor,Vinod H Thourani,Michael J Mack,David J Cohen","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3453","url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceAlthough transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes in the US have improved substantially since 2011, it is unknown whether these trends have continued since 2019.ObjectiveTo examine changes in risk-adjusted TAVR outcomes from 2019 to 2022 and to examine any noteworthy trends over time.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study examined data from patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with TAVR at 786 US hospitals between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2022, included in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Transcatheter Valve Therapies (TVT) Registry.ExposurePatients who underwent TAVR.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day composite adverse events. To understand factors explaining these trends, a series of logistic regression models was constructed for each outcome, with time as the primary explanatory variable. After adjusting for changing patent characteristics and procedural factors, a series of exploratory analyses was performed to examine the extent to which these findings could be explained by several plausible hypotheses.ResultsThis study's analytic cohort included a total of 210 495 patients. Median (IQR) patient age was 79 (73-85) years, and 91 313 patients (43.4%) were female. Median (IQR) STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) was 3.3% (2.0%-5.3%). There were no significant changes in unadjusted 30-day mortality from quarter 1 of 2019 (2.4%) to the end of quarter 1 of 2022 (2.2%) (P for trend = .10), with an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for time of 0.98 per year (95% CI, 0.94-1.01). After adjusting for patient characteristics, the OR increased to 1.05 per year (95% CI, 1.02-1.08), which increased further after adjusting for procedural characteristics to 1.09 per year (95% CI, 1.05-1.13). In exploratory analyses, there were no meaningful changes in the adjusted odds of death after excluding sites that entered the STS/ACC TVT Registry in 2019 or later (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.13), low-volume sites (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.06-1.13), low-risk patients (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15), patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.13), in-hospital deaths (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14), or patients who experienced a major vascular complication (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this observational cohort study performing a national analysis of outcomes after TAVR, it was found that risk-adjusted 30-day mortality increased modestly from January 2019 to March 2022. However, no site-level, patient-related, or process-related factors were identified that could explain these findings. Although the absolute increase in risk-adjusted mortality during the study period was relatively small, these findings warrant continued surveillance.","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influenza Vaccine in High-Risk Cardiovascular Diseases-Define the Target-Reply. 流感疫苗在高危心血管疾病中的应用--确定目标--回复。
IF 24 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3463
Alexander Peikert,Scott D Solomon,Orly Vardeny
{"title":"Influenza Vaccine in High-Risk Cardiovascular Diseases-Define the Target-Reply.","authors":"Alexander Peikert,Scott D Solomon,Orly Vardeny","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3463","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aortic Stenosis, Heart Failure, and Aortic Valve Replacement. 主动脉瓣狭窄、心力衰竭和主动脉瓣置换术。
IF 24 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3486
Siddhartha Mengi,James L Januzzi,João L Cavalcante,Marisa Avvedimento,Attilio Galhardo,Mathieu Bernier,Josep Rodés-Cabau
ImportanceHeart failure (HF) and aortic stenosis (AS) frequently coexist, presenting a complex clinical challenge due to their intertwined pathophysiology and associated high morbidity and mortality. Despite numerous advancements in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR), HF decompensation remains the leading cause of cardiac rehospitalization and a major predictor of mortality in patients with AS, before or after AVR. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the interplay between AS and HF, delving into myocardial changes caused by stenotic insult, the impact of AVR on these changes, and the prevalence and contributing elements of HF before and after AVR.ObservationsThe prevalence of HF remains high before and after AVR, particularly among patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Increased afterload from AS causes cardiac remodeling, which is initially benign but over time these changes become maladaptive, contributing to HF and increased mortality. The progression of HF is influenced by the degree of reverse cardiac remodeling, which can be affected by comorbid conditions, the hemodynamic performance of the valve prosthesis, and vascular stiffness. Several blood and imaging biomarkers offer insights into underlying AS pathophysiology, serving as mortality predictors and predicting HF in this patient population.Conclusions and RelevanceHF development in AS is multifactorial and its link to left ventricular dysfunction is a complex process. Delineating the determinants of HF admissions in AS is crucial for identifying individuals at high risk. Identifying the early signs of left ventricular decompensation by using surrogate markers may be the key, even before left ventricular function becomes impaired. Translating multimodality imaging techniques and biomarkers into routine clinical practice for evaluating cardiac damage and integrating these markers with patient and procedural factors that affect HF before and after AVR can facilitate timely intervention, minimizing the likelihood of HF progression and influencing future guidelines.
重要性心力衰竭(HF)和主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)经常同时存在,由于它们的病理生理学相互交织以及相关的高发病率和死亡率,给临床带来了复杂的挑战。尽管经导管主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)和手术主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)取得了诸多进展,但无论在主动脉瓣置换术之前还是之后,高心力衰竭失代偿仍然是主动脉瓣狭窄患者心脏再住院的主要原因和死亡率的主要预测因素。本综述旨在全面分析 AS 与心房颤动之间的相互作用,深入探讨狭窄损伤引起的心肌变化、主动脉瓣置换术对这些变化的影响以及主动脉瓣置换术前后心房颤动的患病率和诱因。强直性脊柱炎引起的后负荷增加会导致心脏重塑,这种重塑最初是良性的,但随着时间的推移,这些变化会变得不适应,从而导致心房颤动和死亡率增加。心房颤动的进展受心脏反向重塑程度的影响,而心脏反向重塑程度可能受合并症、瓣膜假体的血流动力学性能和血管僵硬度的影响。一些血液和成像生物标志物有助于深入了解强直性脊柱炎的潜在病理生理学,可作为死亡率预测因子并预测该患者群的高房颤。明确强直性脊柱炎患者患高血压的决定因素对于识别高危人群至关重要。使用替代标记物识别左心室失代偿的早期迹象可能是关键,甚至在左心室功能受损之前。将多模态成像技术和生物标记物转化为常规临床实践,用于评估心脏损伤,并将这些标记物与影响房室重建前后房颤的患者和手术因素相结合,可促进及时干预,最大限度地降低房颤恶化的可能性,并影响未来的指南。
{"title":"Aortic Stenosis, Heart Failure, and Aortic Valve Replacement.","authors":"Siddhartha Mengi,James L Januzzi,João L Cavalcante,Marisa Avvedimento,Attilio Galhardo,Mathieu Bernier,Josep Rodés-Cabau","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3486","url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceHeart failure (HF) and aortic stenosis (AS) frequently coexist, presenting a complex clinical challenge due to their intertwined pathophysiology and associated high morbidity and mortality. Despite numerous advancements in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR), HF decompensation remains the leading cause of cardiac rehospitalization and a major predictor of mortality in patients with AS, before or after AVR. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the interplay between AS and HF, delving into myocardial changes caused by stenotic insult, the impact of AVR on these changes, and the prevalence and contributing elements of HF before and after AVR.ObservationsThe prevalence of HF remains high before and after AVR, particularly among patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Increased afterload from AS causes cardiac remodeling, which is initially benign but over time these changes become maladaptive, contributing to HF and increased mortality. The progression of HF is influenced by the degree of reverse cardiac remodeling, which can be affected by comorbid conditions, the hemodynamic performance of the valve prosthesis, and vascular stiffness. Several blood and imaging biomarkers offer insights into underlying AS pathophysiology, serving as mortality predictors and predicting HF in this patient population.Conclusions and RelevanceHF development in AS is multifactorial and its link to left ventricular dysfunction is a complex process. Delineating the determinants of HF admissions in AS is crucial for identifying individuals at high risk. Identifying the early signs of left ventricular decompensation by using surrogate markers may be the key, even before left ventricular function becomes impaired. Translating multimodality imaging techniques and biomarkers into routine clinical practice for evaluating cardiac damage and integrating these markers with patient and procedural factors that affect HF before and after AVR can facilitate timely intervention, minimizing the likelihood of HF progression and influencing future guidelines.","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Coronary Revascularization Guided With Fractional Flow Reserve or Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio: A 5-Year Follow-Up of the DEFINE FLAIR Randomized Clinical Trial. 以分数血流储备或瞬时无波比引导的冠状动脉血运重建:DEFINE FLAIR 随机临床试验的 5 年随访。
IF 24 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3314
Javier Escaned,Alejandro Travieso,Hakim-Moulay Dehbi,Sukhjinder S Nijjer,Sayan Sen,Ricardo Petraco,Manesh Patel,Patrick W Serruys,Justin Davies,
ImportanceThe differences between the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in the long term are unknown.ObjectiveTo compare long-term outcomes of iFR- and FFR-based strategies to guide revascularization.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe DEFINE-FLAIR multicenter study randomized patients with coronary artery disease to use either iFR or FFR as a pressure index to guide revascularization. Patients from 5 continents with coronary artery disease and angiographically intermediate severity stenoses who underwent hemodynamic interrogation with pressure wires were included. These data were analyzed from March, 13, 2014, through April, 27, 2021.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESFive-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization), as well as the individual components of the combined end point.ResultsAt 5 years of follow-up, no significant differences were found between the iFR (mean age [SD], 65.5 [10.8] years; 962 male [77.5%]) and FFR (mean age [SD], 65.2 [10.6] years; 929 male [74.3%]) groups in terms of MACE (21.1% vs 18.4%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.99-1.42; P = .06). While all-cause death was higher among patients randomized to iFR, it was not driven by myocardial infarction (6.3% vs 6.2% in the FFR study arm; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74-1.38; P = .94) or unplanned revascularization (11.9% vs 12.2% in the FFR group; HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78-1.23; P = .87). Furthermore, patients in whom revascularization was deferred on the basis of iFR or FFR had similar MACE in both study arms (17.9% in the iFR group vs 17.5% in the FFR group; HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.79-1.35; P = .80) with similar rates of the components of MACE, including all-cause death. On the contrary, in patients who underwent revascularization after physiologic interrogation, the incidence of MACE was higher in the iFR group (24.6%) compared with the FFR group (19.2%) (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.07-1.72; P = .01).Conclusions and relevanceAt 5-year follow up, an iFR based-strategy was not statistically different than an FFR strategy to guide revascularization in terms of MACE, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02053038.
重要性长期使用分数血流储备(FFR)或瞬时无波比(iFR)之间的差异尚不清楚。目的比较基于 iFR 和 FFR 指导血管再通策略的长期疗效。设计、设置和参与者DEFINE-FLAIR 多中心研究将冠状动脉疾病患者随机分为使用 iFR 或 FFR 作为压力指数来指导血管再通的患者。研究纳入了来自五大洲的冠状动脉疾病和血管造影中度狭窄患者,他们都接受了压力导线的血液动力学检查。主要结局指标5年主要心脏不良事件(MACE)(全因死亡、非致命性心肌梗死和意外血管再通的复合指标)以及综合终点的各个组成部分。结果随访5年后,iFR组(平均年龄[标码]65.5[10.8]岁;962名男性[77.5%])和FFR组(平均年龄[标码]65.2[10.6]岁;929名男性[74.3%])的MACE(分别为21.1% vs 18.4%;危险比[HR],1.18;95% CI,0.99-1.42;P = .06)无明显差异。虽然随机接受 iFR 治疗的患者全因死亡的比例较高,但心肌梗死(6.3% 对 FFR 研究组的 6.2%;HR,1.01;95% CI,0.74-1.38;P = .94)或意外血运重建(11.9% 对 FFR 组的 12.2%;HR,0.98;95% CI,0.78-1.23;P = .87)并不导致全因死亡。此外,根据 iFR 或 FFR 而推迟血管重建的患者在两个研究臂中的 MACE 相似(iFR 组为 17.9% vs FFR 组为 17.5%;HR,1.03;95% CI,0.79-1.35;P = .80),包括全因死亡在内的 MACE 成分发生率相似。相反,在生理检查后接受血管再通的患者中,iFR 组的 MACE 发生率(24.6%)高于 FFR 组(19.2%)(HR,1.36;95% CI,1.07-1.72;P = .01)。结论和相关性在5年随访中,在MACE、非致命性心肌梗死和非计划性血管再通方面,基于iFR的策略与FFR策略在指导血管再通方面没有统计学差异:NCT02053038。
{"title":"Coronary Revascularization Guided With Fractional Flow Reserve or Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio: A 5-Year Follow-Up of the DEFINE FLAIR Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Javier Escaned,Alejandro Travieso,Hakim-Moulay Dehbi,Sukhjinder S Nijjer,Sayan Sen,Ricardo Petraco,Manesh Patel,Patrick W Serruys,Justin Davies,","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3314","url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceThe differences between the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in the long term are unknown.ObjectiveTo compare long-term outcomes of iFR- and FFR-based strategies to guide revascularization.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe DEFINE-FLAIR multicenter study randomized patients with coronary artery disease to use either iFR or FFR as a pressure index to guide revascularization. Patients from 5 continents with coronary artery disease and angiographically intermediate severity stenoses who underwent hemodynamic interrogation with pressure wires were included. These data were analyzed from March, 13, 2014, through April, 27, 2021.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESFive-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization), as well as the individual components of the combined end point.ResultsAt 5 years of follow-up, no significant differences were found between the iFR (mean age [SD], 65.5 [10.8] years; 962 male [77.5%]) and FFR (mean age [SD], 65.2 [10.6] years; 929 male [74.3%]) groups in terms of MACE (21.1% vs 18.4%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.99-1.42; P = .06). While all-cause death was higher among patients randomized to iFR, it was not driven by myocardial infarction (6.3% vs 6.2% in the FFR study arm; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74-1.38; P = .94) or unplanned revascularization (11.9% vs 12.2% in the FFR group; HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78-1.23; P = .87). Furthermore, patients in whom revascularization was deferred on the basis of iFR or FFR had similar MACE in both study arms (17.9% in the iFR group vs 17.5% in the FFR group; HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.79-1.35; P = .80) with similar rates of the components of MACE, including all-cause death. On the contrary, in patients who underwent revascularization after physiologic interrogation, the incidence of MACE was higher in the iFR group (24.6%) compared with the FFR group (19.2%) (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.07-1.72; P = .01).Conclusions and relevanceAt 5-year follow up, an iFR based-strategy was not statistically different than an FFR strategy to guide revascularization in terms of MACE, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02053038.","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Error in Figure 1. 图 1 中的错误。
IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3703
{"title":"Error in Figure 1.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3703","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3703","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465121/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142390597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation by Valve Type in Women With Small Annuli: Results From the SMART Randomized Clinical Trial. 小瓣环女性经导管主动脉瓣植入术的瓣膜类型:SMART 随机临床试验的结果。
IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3241
Didier Tchétché, Roxana Mehran, Daniel J Blackman, Ramzi F Khalil, Helge Möllmann, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Walid Ben Ali, Paul D Mahoney, Hendrik Ruge, Sabine Bleiziffer, Lang Lin, Molly Szerlip, Kendra J Grubb, Isida Byku, Mayra Guerrero, Linda D Gillam, Anna Sonia Petronio, Guilherme F Attizzani, Wayne B Batchelor, Hemal Gada, Toby Rogers, Joshua D Rovin, Brian Whisenant, Stewart Benton, Blake Gardner, Ratnasari Padang, Andrew D Althouse, Howard C Herrmann
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Historically, women with aortic stenosis have experienced worse outcomes and inadequate recognition compared to men, being both underdiagnosed and undertreated, while also facing underrepresentation in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether women with small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement have better clinical and hemodynamic outcomes with a self-expanding valve (SEV) or balloon-expandable valve (BEV).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, participants: </strong>The Small Annuli Randomized to Evolut or SAPIEN Trial (SMART) was a large-scale randomized clinical trial focusing on patients with small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, randomized to receive SEVs or BEVs and included 716 patients treated at 83 centers in Canada, Europe, Israel, and the US from April 2021 to October 2022. This prespecified secondary analysis reports clinical and hemodynamic findings for all 621 women enrolled in SMART. Data for this report were analyzed from February to April 2024.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with an SEV or a BEV.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The composite coprimary clinical end point comprised death, disabling stroke, or heart failure-related rehospitalization. The coprimary valve function end point was the incidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, both assessed through 12 months. Secondary end points included the incidence of moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 621 women (mean [SD] age, 80.2 [6.2] years; 312 randomized to the SEV group and 309 to the BEV group) were included in the present analysis. At 12 months, there were no significant differences in the coprimary clinical end point between the SEV and BEV groups (9.4% vs 11.8%, absolute risk difference -2.3%; 95% CI -7.2 to 2.5, P = .35). However, SEV implantation was associated with less bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (8.4% vs 41.8%; absolute risk difference, -33.4%; 95% CI, -40.4 to -26.4; P < .001). SEV implantation resulted in lower aortic valve gradients and larger effective orifice areas at 30 days and 12 months and less mild or greater aortic regurgitation at 12 months compared to BEV implantation. Prosthesis-patient mismatch was significantly lower with SEVs, regardless of the definition used and adjustment for body mass index. Use of SEVs was associated with better quality of life outcomes as assessed by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 ordinal quality of life measure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Among women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the use of SEVs, compared to BEVs, resulted in similar clinical outcomes and a markedly reduced incidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction through 12 months, including a lower risk of prosthesi
重要性:从历史上看,女性主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗效果比男性差,而且没有得到足够的认可,既诊断不足又治疗不足,同时在临床试验中的代表性也不足:目的:确定患有小主动脉瓣环的女性接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术时,使用自膨胀瓣(SEV)或球囊扩张瓣(BEV)是否能获得更好的临床和血流动力学结果:小主动脉瓣环随机选择Evolut或SAPIEN试验(SMART)是一项大规模随机临床试验,主要针对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的小主动脉瓣环患者,随机选择接受SEV或BEV,共纳入716名患者,这些患者于2021年4月至2022年10月期间在加拿大、欧洲、以色列和美国的83个中心接受治疗。本预设二次分析报告了所有 621 名参加 SMART 的女性患者的临床和血液动力学结果。本报告的数据分析时间为 2024 年 2 月至 4 月:经导管主动脉瓣置换 SEV 或 BEV:复合主要临床终点包括死亡、致残性中风或心衰相关再住院。共同主要瓣膜功能终点是生物人工瓣膜功能障碍的发生率,均在12个月内进行评估。次要终点包括中度或重度人工瓣膜与患者不匹配的发生率:本分析共纳入了 621 名女性(平均 [SD] 年龄为 80.2 [6.2] 岁;312 名随机分配到 SEV 组,309 名随机分配到 BEV 组)。12个月后,SEV组和BEV组的主要临床终点无显著差异(9.4% vs 11.8%,绝对风险差异-2.3%;95% CI -7.2 to 2.5,P = .35)。然而,SEV植入与较少的生物人工瓣膜功能障碍相关(8.4% vs 41.8%;绝对风险差异,-33.4%;95% CI,-40.4 至 -26.4;P 结论及意义:在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的重度症状性主动脉瓣狭窄和小主动脉瓣环的女性患者中,与BEV相比,使用SEV可获得相似的临床结果,12个月内生物假体瓣膜功能障碍的发生率明显降低,包括假体与患者不匹配的风险更低,12个月的生活质量更好:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04722250。
{"title":"Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation by Valve Type in Women With Small Annuli: Results From the SMART Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Didier Tchétché, Roxana Mehran, Daniel J Blackman, Ramzi F Khalil, Helge Möllmann, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Walid Ben Ali, Paul D Mahoney, Hendrik Ruge, Sabine Bleiziffer, Lang Lin, Molly Szerlip, Kendra J Grubb, Isida Byku, Mayra Guerrero, Linda D Gillam, Anna Sonia Petronio, Guilherme F Attizzani, Wayne B Batchelor, Hemal Gada, Toby Rogers, Joshua D Rovin, Brian Whisenant, Stewart Benton, Blake Gardner, Ratnasari Padang, Andrew D Althouse, Howard C Herrmann","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3241","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3241","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Historically, women with aortic stenosis have experienced worse outcomes and inadequate recognition compared to men, being both underdiagnosed and undertreated, while also facing underrepresentation in clinical trials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To determine whether women with small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement have better clinical and hemodynamic outcomes with a self-expanding valve (SEV) or balloon-expandable valve (BEV).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, participants: &lt;/strong&gt;The Small Annuli Randomized to Evolut or SAPIEN Trial (SMART) was a large-scale randomized clinical trial focusing on patients with small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, randomized to receive SEVs or BEVs and included 716 patients treated at 83 centers in Canada, Europe, Israel, and the US from April 2021 to October 2022. This prespecified secondary analysis reports clinical and hemodynamic findings for all 621 women enrolled in SMART. Data for this report were analyzed from February to April 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with an SEV or a BEV.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The composite coprimary clinical end point comprised death, disabling stroke, or heart failure-related rehospitalization. The coprimary valve function end point was the incidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, both assessed through 12 months. Secondary end points included the incidence of moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 621 women (mean [SD] age, 80.2 [6.2] years; 312 randomized to the SEV group and 309 to the BEV group) were included in the present analysis. At 12 months, there were no significant differences in the coprimary clinical end point between the SEV and BEV groups (9.4% vs 11.8%, absolute risk difference -2.3%; 95% CI -7.2 to 2.5, P = .35). However, SEV implantation was associated with less bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (8.4% vs 41.8%; absolute risk difference, -33.4%; 95% CI, -40.4 to -26.4; P &lt; .001). SEV implantation resulted in lower aortic valve gradients and larger effective orifice areas at 30 days and 12 months and less mild or greater aortic regurgitation at 12 months compared to BEV implantation. Prosthesis-patient mismatch was significantly lower with SEVs, regardless of the definition used and adjustment for body mass index. Use of SEVs was associated with better quality of life outcomes as assessed by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 ordinal quality of life measure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;Among women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the use of SEVs, compared to BEVs, resulted in similar clinical outcomes and a markedly reduced incidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction through 12 months, including a lower risk of prosthesi","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142390599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ventricular Septal Rupture After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. ST 段抬高心肌梗死后室间隔破裂。
IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3308
Alex Melot, Pierre Groussin, Raphaël P Martins
{"title":"Ventricular Septal Rupture After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Alex Melot, Pierre Groussin, Raphaël P Martins","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3308","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142390600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. 急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受药物洗脱支架术后的短期双联抗血小板疗法:系统综述与网络 Meta 分析》。
IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216
Pedro E P Carvalho, Douglas M Gewehr, Bruno R Nascimento, Lara Melo, Giullia Burkhardt, André Rivera, Marcelo A P Braga, Patricia O Guimarães, Roxana Mehran, Stephan Windecker, Marco Valgimigli, Dominick J Angiolillo, Deepak L Bhatt, Yader Sandoval, Shao-Liang Chen, Gregg W Stone, Renato D Lopes

Importance: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains under debate.

Objectives: To analyze the efficacy and safety of DAPT strategies in patients with ACS using a bayesian network meta-analysis.

Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases were searched from inception to April 8, 2024.

Study selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DAPT duration strategies in patients with ACS undergoing PCI were selected. Short-term strategies (1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors, 3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors, 3 months of DAPT followed by aspirin, and 6 months of DAPT followed by aspirin) were compared with conventional 12 months of DAPT.

Data extraction and synthesis: This systematic review and network meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) with a 95% credible interval (CrI) was calculated within a bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis. Treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary efficacy end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); the primary safety end point was major bleeding.

Results: A total of 15 RCTs randomizing 35 326 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.1 [11.1] years; 26 954 male [76.3%]; 11 339 STEMI [32.1%]) with ACS were included. A total of 24 797 patients (70.2%) received potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor or prasugrel). Compared with 12 months of DAPT, 1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors reduced major bleeding (RR, 0.47; 95% CrI, 0.26-0.74) with no difference in MACCE (RR, 1.00; 95% CrI, 0.70-1.41). No significant differences were observed in MACCE incidence between strategies, although CrIs were wide. SUCRA ranked 1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors as the best for reducing major bleeding and 3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors as optimal for reducing MACCE (RR, 0.85; 95% CrI, 0.56-1.21).

Conclusion and relevance: Results of this systematic review and network meta-analysis reveal that, in patients with ACS undergoing PCI with DES, 1 month of DAPT followed by potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a reduction in major bleeding without increasing MACCE when compared with 12 months of DAPT. However, an increased risk of MACCE cannot be excluded, and 3 months of DAPT followed by potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was ranked as the best option to reduce MACCE. Because most patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy were taking ticagrelor, the safety of stopping aspirin in those taking clopidogrel remains unclear.

重要性:接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者接受双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳时间仍存在争议:采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析法分析 DAPT 策略对 ACS 患者的疗效和安全性:数据来源:检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane和LILACS数据库,检索时间从开始到2024年4月8日:研究选择:对接受PCI治疗的ACS患者的DAPT持续时间策略进行比较的随机临床试验(RCT)。短期策略(DAPT 1 个月后使用 P2Y12 抑制剂、DAPT 3 个月后使用 P2Y12 抑制剂、DAPT 3 个月后使用阿司匹林、DAPT 6 个月后使用阿司匹林)与传统的 12 个月 DAPT 进行了比较:本系统综述和网络荟萃分析遵循《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南。在贝叶斯随机效应网络荟萃分析中计算了风险比 (RR) 和 95% 可信区间 (CrI)。主要结果和测量指标:主要疗效终点为主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE);主要安全性终点为大出血:结果:共纳入了 15 项 RCT,随机抽取了 35 326 名 ACS 患者(平均 [SD] 年龄 63.1 [11.1] 岁;26 954 名男性 [76.3%];11 339 名 STEMI [32.1%])。共有 24 797 名患者(70.2%)接受了强效 P2Y12 抑制剂(替卡格雷或普拉格雷)治疗。与 12 个月的 DAPT 相比,1 个月的 DAPT 后使用 P2Y12 抑制剂可减少大出血(RR,0.47;95% CrI,0.26-0.74),但 MACCE 无差异(RR,1.00;95% CrI,0.70-1.41)。不同策略间的 MACCE 发生率无明显差异,但 CrIs 较大。SUCRA 将 1 个月的 DAPT 和 P2Y12 抑制剂列为减少大出血的最佳方案,将 3 个月的 DAPT 和 P2Y12 抑制剂列为减少 MACCE 的最佳方案(RR,0.85;95% CrI,0.56-1.21):本系统综述和网络荟萃分析的结果显示,在使用 DES 进行 PCI 的 ACS 患者中,与 12 个月的 DAPT 相比,1 个月的 DAPT 后使用强效 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗可减少大出血,但不会增加 MACCE。然而,不能排除 MACCE 风险增加的可能性,因此 3 个月 DAPT 后再接受强效 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗被列为减少 MACCE 的最佳选择。由于大多数接受 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗的患者都在服用替卡格雷,因此服用氯吡格雷的患者停用阿司匹林的安全性仍不明确。
{"title":"Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Pedro E P Carvalho, Douglas M Gewehr, Bruno R Nascimento, Lara Melo, Giullia Burkhardt, André Rivera, Marcelo A P Braga, Patricia O Guimarães, Roxana Mehran, Stephan Windecker, Marco Valgimigli, Dominick J Angiolillo, Deepak L Bhatt, Yader Sandoval, Shao-Liang Chen, Gregg W Stone, Renato D Lopes","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains under debate.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the efficacy and safety of DAPT strategies in patients with ACS using a bayesian network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases were searched from inception to April 8, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DAPT duration strategies in patients with ACS undergoing PCI were selected. Short-term strategies (1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors, 3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors, 3 months of DAPT followed by aspirin, and 6 months of DAPT followed by aspirin) were compared with conventional 12 months of DAPT.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>This systematic review and network meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) with a 95% credible interval (CrI) was calculated within a bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis. Treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary efficacy end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); the primary safety end point was major bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 RCTs randomizing 35 326 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.1 [11.1] years; 26 954 male [76.3%]; 11 339 STEMI [32.1%]) with ACS were included. A total of 24 797 patients (70.2%) received potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor or prasugrel). Compared with 12 months of DAPT, 1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors reduced major bleeding (RR, 0.47; 95% CrI, 0.26-0.74) with no difference in MACCE (RR, 1.00; 95% CrI, 0.70-1.41). No significant differences were observed in MACCE incidence between strategies, although CrIs were wide. SUCRA ranked 1 month of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors as the best for reducing major bleeding and 3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitors as optimal for reducing MACCE (RR, 0.85; 95% CrI, 0.56-1.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Results of this systematic review and network meta-analysis reveal that, in patients with ACS undergoing PCI with DES, 1 month of DAPT followed by potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a reduction in major bleeding without increasing MACCE when compared with 12 months of DAPT. However, an increased risk of MACCE cannot be excluded, and 3 months of DAPT followed by potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was ranked as the best option to reduce MACCE. Because most patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy were taking ticagrelor, the safety of stopping aspirin in those taking clopidogrel remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581547/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142390598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Amiodarone or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Chagas Cardiomyopathy: The CHAGASICS Randomized Clinical Trial. 胺碘酮或植入式心律转复除颤器治疗恰加斯心肌病:CHAGASICS 随机临床试验。
IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3169
Martino Martinelli-Filho, José A Marin-Neto, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca, Angelo Amato Vincenzo de Paola, Paulo de Tarso Jorge Medeiros, Ruth Owen, Stuart J Pocock, Sergio Freitas de Siqueira

Importance: Over 10 000 people with Chagas disease experience sudden cardiac death (SCD) annually, mostly caused by ventricular fibrillation. Amiodarone hydrochloride and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) have been empirically used to prevent SCD in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that ICD is more effective than amiodarone therapy for primary prevention of all-cause mortality in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy and moderate to high mortality risk, assessed by the Rassi score.

Design, setting, and participants: CHAGASICS is an open-label, randomized clinical trial. The study enrolled patients from 13 centers in Brazil from May 30, 2014, to August 13, 2021, with the last follow-up November 8, 2021. Patients with serological findings positive for Chagas disease, a Rassi risk score of at least 10 points (intermediate to high risk), and at least 1 episode of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were eligible to participate. Data were analyzed from May 3, 2022, to June 16, 2023.

Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ICD or amiodarone (with a loading dose of 600 mg after randomization).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included SCD, hospitalization for heart failure, and necessity of a pacemaker during the entire follow-up.

Results: The study was stopped prematurely for administrative reasons, with 323 patients randomized (166 in the amiodarone group and 157 in the ICD group), rather than the intended 1100 patients. Analysis was by intention to treat at a median follow-up of 3.6 (IQR, 1.8-4.4) years. Mean (SD) age was 57.4 (9.8) years, 185 patients (57.3%) were male, and the mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 37.0% (11.6%). There were 60 deaths (38.2%) in the ICD arm and 64 (38.6%) in the amiodarone group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.60-1.22]; P = .40). The rates of SCD (6 [3.8%] vs 23 [13.9%]; HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.10-0.61]; P = .001), bradycardia requiring pacing (3 [1.9%] vs 27 [16.3%]; HR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.34]; P < .001), and heart failure hospitalization (14 [8.9%] vs 28 [16.9%]; HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.87]; P = .01) were lower in the ICD group compared with the amiodarone arm.

Conclusions and relevance: In patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy at moderate to high risk of mortality, ICD did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. However, ICD significantly reduced the risk of SCD, pacing need, and heart failure hospitalization compared with amiodarone therapy. Further studies are warranted to confirm the evidence generated by this trial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01722942.

重要性:每年有 10 000 多名南美锥虫病患者发生心脏性猝死 (SCD),大多数是由心室颤动引起的。盐酸胺碘酮和植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)已被经验性地用于预防慢性恰加斯心肌病患者的 SCD:目的:验证 ICD 比胺碘酮疗法更能有效预防慢性恰加斯心肌病患者全因死亡的假设:CHAGASICS是一项开放标签、随机临床试验。该研究从2014年5月30日至2021年8月13日在巴西的13个中心招募患者,最后一次随访时间为2021年11月8日。血清学检查结果为南美锥虫病阳性、拉西风险评分至少为 10 分(中高风险)、至少发生过一次非持续性室性心动过速的患者均符合参与条件。数据分析时间为2022年5月3日至2023年6月16日:患者按 1:1 随机分配接受 ICD 或胺碘酮(随机分配后负荷剂量为 600 毫克):主要结果和测量指标:主要结果是全因死亡率,次要结果包括SCD、心衰住院以及在整个随访期间是否需要安装起搏器:由于管理方面的原因,研究提前结束,323 名患者被随机分组(胺碘酮组 166 人,ICD 组 157 人),而非预期的 1100 名患者。分析采用意向治疗,中位随访时间为 3.6(IQR,1.8-4.4)年。平均(标清)年龄为 57.4 (9.8)岁,185 名患者(57.3%)为男性,平均(标清)左心室射血分数为 37.0% (11.6%)。ICD 组有 60 人死亡(38.2%),胺碘酮组有 64 人死亡(38.6%)(危险比 [HR],0.86 [95% CI,0.60-1.22];P = .40)。SCD 发生率(6 [3.8%] vs 23 [13.9%];HR,0.25 [95% CI,0.10-0.61];P = .001)、需要起搏的心动过缓发生率(3 [1.9%] vs 27 [16.3%];HR,0.10 [95% CI,0.03-0.34];P 结论和意义:对于具有中度至高度死亡风险的慢性恰加斯病心肌病患者,ICD 并未降低全因死亡风险。然而,与胺碘酮疗法相比,ICD 能明显降低 SCD、起搏需求和心衰住院的风险。有必要开展进一步研究,以证实本试验所提供的证据:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT01722942.
{"title":"Amiodarone or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Chagas Cardiomyopathy: The CHAGASICS Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Martino Martinelli-Filho, José A Marin-Neto, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca, Angelo Amato Vincenzo de Paola, Paulo de Tarso Jorge Medeiros, Ruth Owen, Stuart J Pocock, Sergio Freitas de Siqueira","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3169","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3169","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Over 10 000 people with Chagas disease experience sudden cardiac death (SCD) annually, mostly caused by ventricular fibrillation. Amiodarone hydrochloride and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) have been empirically used to prevent SCD in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the hypothesis that ICD is more effective than amiodarone therapy for primary prevention of all-cause mortality in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy and moderate to high mortality risk, assessed by the Rassi score.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>CHAGASICS is an open-label, randomized clinical trial. The study enrolled patients from 13 centers in Brazil from May 30, 2014, to August 13, 2021, with the last follow-up November 8, 2021. Patients with serological findings positive for Chagas disease, a Rassi risk score of at least 10 points (intermediate to high risk), and at least 1 episode of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were eligible to participate. Data were analyzed from May 3, 2022, to June 16, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ICD or amiodarone (with a loading dose of 600 mg after randomization).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included SCD, hospitalization for heart failure, and necessity of a pacemaker during the entire follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was stopped prematurely for administrative reasons, with 323 patients randomized (166 in the amiodarone group and 157 in the ICD group), rather than the intended 1100 patients. Analysis was by intention to treat at a median follow-up of 3.6 (IQR, 1.8-4.4) years. Mean (SD) age was 57.4 (9.8) years, 185 patients (57.3%) were male, and the mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 37.0% (11.6%). There were 60 deaths (38.2%) in the ICD arm and 64 (38.6%) in the amiodarone group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.60-1.22]; P = .40). The rates of SCD (6 [3.8%] vs 23 [13.9%]; HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.10-0.61]; P = .001), bradycardia requiring pacing (3 [1.9%] vs 27 [16.3%]; HR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.34]; P < .001), and heart failure hospitalization (14 [8.9%] vs 28 [16.9%]; HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.87]; P = .01) were lower in the ICD group compared with the amiodarone arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy at moderate to high risk of mortality, ICD did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. However, ICD significantly reduced the risk of SCD, pacing need, and heart failure hospitalization compared with amiodarone therapy. Further studies are warranted to confirm the evidence generated by this trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01722942.</p>","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447631/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frailty in an Elderly Cohort With Myocardial Infarction and High Bleeding Risk-Reply. 患有心肌梗死和高出血风险的老年群体中的虚弱现象--回复。
IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3020
Simone Biscaglia, Andrea Erriquez, Gianluca Campo
{"title":"Frailty in an Elderly Cohort With Myocardial Infarction and High Bleeding Risk-Reply.","authors":"Simone Biscaglia, Andrea Erriquez, Gianluca Campo","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA cardiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1