首页 > 最新文献

JAMA neurology最新文献

英文 中文
Tapping the Brakes on New Parkinson Disease Biological Staging. 新帕金森病生物分期的刹车。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2054
Njideka U Okubadejo, Michael S Okun, Joseph Jankovic
{"title":"Tapping the Brakes on New Parkinson Disease Biological Staging.","authors":"Njideka U Okubadejo, Michael S Okun, Joseph Jankovic","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2054","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2054","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incorrect Nomenclature May Lead to Questionable Concepts. 不正确的命名可能会导致有疑问的概念。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1660
Carsten A Wagner
{"title":"Incorrect Nomenclature May Lead to Questionable Concepts.","authors":"Carsten A Wagner","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1660","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1660","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141296021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time to Think About Myocardial Infarction in Acute Ischemic Stroke. 是时候考虑急性缺血性脑卒中的心肌梗死了。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1547
Alison Seitz, Alexander E Merkler
{"title":"Time to Think About Myocardial Infarction in Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Alison Seitz, Alexander E Merkler","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1547","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1547","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141199820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immediate- or Delayed-Intensive Statin in Acute Cerebral Ischemia: The INSPIRES Randomized Clinical Trial. 急性脑缺血时立即或延迟使用他汀类药物:INSPIRES 随机临床试验》。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1433
Ying Gao, Lingling Jiang, Yuesong Pan, Weiqi Chen, Jing Jing, Chunjuan Wang, S Claiborne Johnston, Pierre Amarenco, Philip M Bath, Yingying Yang, Tingting Wang, Shangrong Han, Xia Meng, Jinxi Lin, Xingquan Zhao, Liping Liu, Jinguo Zhao, Ying Li, Yingzhuo Zang, Shuo Zhang, Hongqin Yang, Jianbo Yang, Yuanwei Wang, Dali Li, Yanxia Wang, Dongqi Liu, Guangming Kang, Yongjun Wang, Yilong Wang

Importance: Comparisons are limited for immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin for secondary stroke prevention and neuroprotection in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) from atherosclerosis.

Objective: To estimate whether immediate-intensive statin therapy is safe and can lower the risk of recurrent stroke compared with delayed-intensive statin in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA from atherosclerosis.

Design, setting, and participants: The Intensive Statin and Antiplatelet Therapy for High-Risk Intracranial or Extracranial Atherosclerosis (INSPIRES) trial, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from September 2018 to October 2022. The trial was conducted at 222 hospitals in China. Patients aged 35 to 80 years with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA of presumed atherosclerosis within 72 hours of symptom onset were assessed.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive immediate-intensive atorvastatin (80 mg daily on days 1-21; 40 mg daily on days 22-90) or 3-day delayed treatment (placebo for days 1-3, followed by placebo and atorvastatin, 40 mg daily on days 4-21, and then atorvastatin, 40 mg daily on days 22-90).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke within 90 days, and a secondary efficacy outcome was poor functional outcome. Moderate to severe bleeding was the primary safety outcome.

Results: A total of 11 431 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 6100 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [57-71] years; 3915 men [64.2%]) were enrolled, with 3050 assigned to each treatment group. Within 90 days, new stroke occurred in 245 patients (8.1%) in the immediate-intensive statin group and 256 patients (8.4%) in the delayed group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80-1.13). Poor functional outcome occurred in 299 patients (9.8%) and 348 patients (11.4%) in the immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98). Moderate to severe bleeding occurred in 23 of 3050 patients (0.8%) and 17 of 3050 patients (0.6%), in the immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin groups, respectively.

Conclusions and relevance: Immediate-intensive statin initiated within 72 hours did not reduce the risk of stroke within 90 days and may be associated with improved functional outcomes without significant difference in moderate to severe bleeding, compared with 3-day delayed-intensive statin in Chinese patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or TIA from atherosclerosis.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635749.

重要性:对于动脉粥样硬化引起的急性轻度缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者,立即密集型他汀和延迟密集型他汀在卒中二级预防和神经保护方面的比较有限:目的:评估与延迟强化他汀相比,立即强化他汀治疗急性轻度缺血性脑卒中或动脉粥样硬化引起的高危短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者是否安全并能降低复发脑卒中的风险:高危颅内或颅外动脉粥样硬化强化他汀和抗血小板治疗(INSPIRES)试验是一项双盲、安慰剂对照、2 × 2因子随机临床试验,于2018年9月至2022年10月招募患者。试验在中国 222 家医院进行。年龄在35至80岁之间的轻度缺血性脑卒中或高危TIA患者在症状出现72小时内接受推测动脉粥样硬化的评估:患者被随机分配接受即时强化阿托伐他汀(第1-21天,每天80毫克;第22-90天,每天40毫克)或3天延迟治疗(第1-3天服用安慰剂,第4-21天服用安慰剂和阿托伐他汀,每天40毫克,第22-90天服用阿托伐他汀,每天40毫克):主要疗效和测量指标:主要疗效指标为 90 天内新发中风,次要疗效指标为不良功能预后。中度至重度出血是主要的安全性结果:共对 11 431 名患者进行了资格评估,6100 名患者(中位数[IQR]年龄 65 [57-71] 岁;3915 名男性[64.2%])入组,每个治疗组分配 3050 名患者。在 90 天内,立即加强他汀治疗组有 245 名患者(8.1%)发生新发中风,延迟治疗组有 256 名患者(8.4%)发生新发中风(危险比为 0.95;95% CI 为 0.80-1.13)。在立即强化和延迟强化他汀类药物组中,分别有 299 名患者(9.8%)和 348 名患者(11.4%)出现不良功能预后(几率比为 0.83;95% CI 为 0.71-0.98)。在3050例患者中,有23例(0.8%)发生了中度至重度出血,在3050例患者中,有17例(0.6%)发生了中度至重度出血:在动脉粥样硬化引起的急性轻度缺血性脑卒中或TIA的中国患者中,与3天延迟强化他汀相比,72小时内启动的即时强化他汀并不能降低90天内的脑卒中风险,而且可能与功能预后的改善有关,但在中重度出血方面没有显著差异:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03635749。
{"title":"Immediate- or Delayed-Intensive Statin in Acute Cerebral Ischemia: The INSPIRES Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ying Gao, Lingling Jiang, Yuesong Pan, Weiqi Chen, Jing Jing, Chunjuan Wang, S Claiborne Johnston, Pierre Amarenco, Philip M Bath, Yingying Yang, Tingting Wang, Shangrong Han, Xia Meng, Jinxi Lin, Xingquan Zhao, Liping Liu, Jinguo Zhao, Ying Li, Yingzhuo Zang, Shuo Zhang, Hongqin Yang, Jianbo Yang, Yuanwei Wang, Dali Li, Yanxia Wang, Dongqi Liu, Guangming Kang, Yongjun Wang, Yilong Wang","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1433","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1433","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Comparisons are limited for immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin for secondary stroke prevention and neuroprotection in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) from atherosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate whether immediate-intensive statin therapy is safe and can lower the risk of recurrent stroke compared with delayed-intensive statin in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA from atherosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Intensive Statin and Antiplatelet Therapy for High-Risk Intracranial or Extracranial Atherosclerosis (INSPIRES) trial, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from September 2018 to October 2022. The trial was conducted at 222 hospitals in China. Patients aged 35 to 80 years with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA of presumed atherosclerosis within 72 hours of symptom onset were assessed.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to receive immediate-intensive atorvastatin (80 mg daily on days 1-21; 40 mg daily on days 22-90) or 3-day delayed treatment (placebo for days 1-3, followed by placebo and atorvastatin, 40 mg daily on days 4-21, and then atorvastatin, 40 mg daily on days 22-90).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke within 90 days, and a secondary efficacy outcome was poor functional outcome. Moderate to severe bleeding was the primary safety outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 431 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 6100 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [57-71] years; 3915 men [64.2%]) were enrolled, with 3050 assigned to each treatment group. Within 90 days, new stroke occurred in 245 patients (8.1%) in the immediate-intensive statin group and 256 patients (8.4%) in the delayed group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80-1.13). Poor functional outcome occurred in 299 patients (9.8%) and 348 patients (11.4%) in the immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98). Moderate to severe bleeding occurred in 23 of 3050 patients (0.8%) and 17 of 3050 patients (0.6%), in the immediate-intensive and delayed-intensive statin groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Immediate-intensive statin initiated within 72 hours did not reduce the risk of stroke within 90 days and may be associated with improved functional outcomes without significant difference in moderate to severe bleeding, compared with 3-day delayed-intensive statin in Chinese patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or TIA from atherosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635749.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11134282/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time From Hospital Arrival Until Endovascular Thrombectomy and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者从到达医院到血管内血栓切除术的时间与患者自述的预后。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1562
Raed A Joundi, Eric E Smith, Aravind Ganesh, Raul G Nogueira, Ryan A McTaggart, Andrew M Demchuk, Alexandre Y Poppe, Jeremy L Rempel, Thalia S Field, Dar Dowlatshahi, Jim Sahlas, Richard Swartz, Ruchir Shah, Eric Sauvageau, Volker Puetz, Frank L Silver, Bruce Campbell, René Chapot, Michael Tymianski, Mayank Goyal, Michael D Hill
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The time-benefit association of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in ischemic stroke with patient-reported outcomes is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the time-dependent association of EVT with self-reported quality of life in patients with acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Data were used from the Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) trial, which tested the effect of nerinetide on functional outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion undergoing EVT and enrolled patients from March 1, 2017, to August 12, 2019. The ESCAPE-NA1 trial was an international randomized clinical trial that recruited patients from 7 countries. Patients with EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) index values at 90 days and survivors with complete domain scores were included in the current study. Data were analyzed from July to September 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Hospital arrival to arterial puncture time and other time metrics.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>EQ-5D-5L index scores were calculated at 90 days using country-specific value sets. The association between time from hospital arrival to EVT arterial-access (door-to-puncture) and EQ-5D-5L index score, quality-adjusted life years, and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) were evaluated using quantile regression, adjusting for age, sex, stroke severity, stroke imaging, wake-up stroke, alteplase, and nerinetide treatment and accounting for clustering by site. Using logistic regression, the association between door-to-puncture time and reporting no or slight symptoms (compared with moderate, severe, or extreme problems) was determined in each domain (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) or across all domains. Time from stroke onset was also evaluated, and missing data were imputed in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1105 patients in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, there were 1043 patients with EQ-5D-5L index values at 90 days, among whom 147 had died and were given a score of 0, and 1039 patients (mean [SD] age, 69.0 [13.7] years; 527 male [50.7%]) in the final analysis as 4 did not receive EVT. There were 896 survivors with complete domain scores at 90 days. There was a strong association between door-to-puncture time and EQ-5D-5L index score (increase of 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.04 per 15 minutes of earlier treatment), quality-adjusted life years (increase of 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-0.49 per 15 minutes of earlier treatment), and EQ-VAS (increase of 1.65; 95% CI, 0.56-2.72 per 15 minutes of earlier treatment). Each 15 minutes of faster door-to-puncture time was associated with higher probability of no or slight problems in each of 5 domains and all domains concurrently (range from 1.86%; 95% CI, 1.14-2.58 for pain or discomfort to 3.55%; 95% CI, 2.06-5.04 for all domai
重要性:缺血性脑卒中血管内血栓切除术(EVT)与患者报告结果之间的时间效益关系尚不清楚:评估急性缺血性脑卒中患者自我报告的生活质量与 EVT 的时间相关性:该试验测试了奈瑞奈肽对接受EVT的大血管闭塞患者功能预后的影响,入组时间为2017年3月1日至2019年8月12日。ESCAPE-NA1试验是一项国际随机临床试验,招募了来自7个国家的患者。本次研究纳入了90天时具有EuroQol 5维5级(EQ-5D-5L)指数值的患者和具有完整领域评分的幸存者。数据分析时间为2023年7月至9月。暴露:从到达医院到动脉穿刺的时间及其他时间指标:主要结果和测量指标:使用国家特定值集计算90天后的EQ-5D-5L指数得分。在调整年龄、性别、卒中严重程度、卒中影像学、卒中唤醒、阿替普酶和奈奈奈德治疗并考虑按部位聚类的情况下,使用量纲回归评估了从到达医院到EVT动脉穿刺(门到穿刺)的时间与EQ-5D-5L指数得分、质量调整生命年和视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)之间的关联。通过逻辑回归,确定了在每个领域(行动能力、自理能力、日常活动、疼痛或不适、焦虑或抑郁)或所有领域中,门到穿刺时间与报告无症状或轻微症状(与中度、重度或极度问题相比)之间的关系。此外,还评估了中风发病时间,并在敏感性分析中对缺失数据进行了估算:在ESCAPE-NA1试验的1105名患者中,有1043名患者在90天时获得了EQ-5D-5L指数值,其中147人死亡,得分为0,1039名患者(平均[标码]年龄为69.0[13.7]岁;527名男性[50.7%])在最终分析中,有4人未接受EVT。896名幸存者在90天时获得了完整的领域评分。门到穿刺时间与 EQ-5D-5L 指数得分(每提前 15 分钟治疗,增加 0.03;95% CI,0.02-0.04)、质量调整生命年(每提前 15 分钟治疗,增加 0.29;95% CI,0.08-0.49)和 EQ-VAS (每提前 15 分钟治疗,增加 1.65;95% CI,0.56-2.72)之间存在密切联系。门到穿刺时间每提前 15 分钟,5 个领域中的每个领域以及同时出现的所有领域出现无问题或轻微问题的概率就会增加(范围从疼痛或不适的 1.86%;95% CI,1.14-2.58 到同时出现的所有领域的 3.55%;95% CI,2.06-5.04)。从进门到穿刺的时间少于 60 分钟与各领域无问题或有轻微问题的几率较高有关,疼痛或不适的几率比为 1.49(95% CI,1.13-1.95),行动不便的几率比为 2.59(95% CI,1.83-3.68),需要治疗的人数从 7 到 17 不等。在对缺失数据进行多重估算后,结果相似,但在评估中风发病时间时,结果有所减弱:结果表明,更快的门到穿刺 EVT 时间与所有领域中更好的健康相关生活质量密切相关。这些结果支持了从入院到治疗的速度对患者报告结果的有利影响,并鼓励通过优化院内流程和工作流程来改善急性卒中中以患者为中心的护理。
{"title":"Time From Hospital Arrival Until Endovascular Thrombectomy and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Raed A Joundi, Eric E Smith, Aravind Ganesh, Raul G Nogueira, Ryan A McTaggart, Andrew M Demchuk, Alexandre Y Poppe, Jeremy L Rempel, Thalia S Field, Dar Dowlatshahi, Jim Sahlas, Richard Swartz, Ruchir Shah, Eric Sauvageau, Volker Puetz, Frank L Silver, Bruce Campbell, René Chapot, Michael Tymianski, Mayank Goyal, Michael D Hill","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1562","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1562","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;The time-benefit association of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in ischemic stroke with patient-reported outcomes is unknown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the time-dependent association of EVT with self-reported quality of life in patients with acute ischemic stroke.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;Data were used from the Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) trial, which tested the effect of nerinetide on functional outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion undergoing EVT and enrolled patients from March 1, 2017, to August 12, 2019. The ESCAPE-NA1 trial was an international randomized clinical trial that recruited patients from 7 countries. Patients with EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) index values at 90 days and survivors with complete domain scores were included in the current study. Data were analyzed from July to September 2023.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposure: &lt;/strong&gt;Hospital arrival to arterial puncture time and other time metrics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;EQ-5D-5L index scores were calculated at 90 days using country-specific value sets. The association between time from hospital arrival to EVT arterial-access (door-to-puncture) and EQ-5D-5L index score, quality-adjusted life years, and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) were evaluated using quantile regression, adjusting for age, sex, stroke severity, stroke imaging, wake-up stroke, alteplase, and nerinetide treatment and accounting for clustering by site. Using logistic regression, the association between door-to-puncture time and reporting no or slight symptoms (compared with moderate, severe, or extreme problems) was determined in each domain (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) or across all domains. Time from stroke onset was also evaluated, and missing data were imputed in sensitivity analyses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Among 1105 patients in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, there were 1043 patients with EQ-5D-5L index values at 90 days, among whom 147 had died and were given a score of 0, and 1039 patients (mean [SD] age, 69.0 [13.7] years; 527 male [50.7%]) in the final analysis as 4 did not receive EVT. There were 896 survivors with complete domain scores at 90 days. There was a strong association between door-to-puncture time and EQ-5D-5L index score (increase of 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.04 per 15 minutes of earlier treatment), quality-adjusted life years (increase of 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-0.49 per 15 minutes of earlier treatment), and EQ-VAS (increase of 1.65; 95% CI, 0.56-2.72 per 15 minutes of earlier treatment). Each 15 minutes of faster door-to-puncture time was associated with higher probability of no or slight problems in each of 5 domains and all domains concurrently (range from 1.86%; 95% CI, 1.14-2.58 for pain or discomfort to 3.55%; 95% CI, 2.06-5.04 for all domai","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11148789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141199804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early vs Late Anticoagulation in Minor, Moderate, and Major Ischemic Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation: Post Hoc Analysis of the ELAN Randomized Clinical Trial. 心房颤动伴轻度、中度和重度缺血性卒中的早期抗凝与晚期抗凝:ELAN 随机临床试验的事后分析。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1450
Martina B Goeldlin, Arsany Hakim, Mattia Branca, Stefanie Abend, Markus Kneihsl, Waldo Valenzuela Pinilla, Sabine Fenzl, Beata Rezny-Kasprzak, Roman Rohner, Daniel Strbian, Maurizio Paciaroni, Goetz Thomalla, Patrik Michel, Krassen Nedeltchev, Thomas Gattringer, Else Charlotte Sandset, Leo Bonati, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, P N Sylaja, George Ntaios, Masatoshi Koga, Zuzana Gdovinova, Robin Lemmens, Natan M Bornstein, Peter Kelly, Mira Katan, Thomas Horvath, Jesse Dawson, Urs Fischer
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Whether infarct size modifies the treatment effect of early vs late direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) initiation in people with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether infarct size modifies the safety and efficacy of early vs late DOAC initiation.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Post hoc analysis of participants from the multinational (>100 sites in 15 countries) randomized clinical Early Versus Later Anticoagulation for Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation (ELAN) trial who had (1) acute ischemic stroke, (2) atrial fibrillation, and (3) brain imaging available before randomization. The ELAN trial was conducted between October 2017 and December 2022. Data were analyzed from October to December 2023 for this post hoc analysis.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Early vs late DOAC initiation after ischemic stroke. Early DOAC initiation was within 48 hours for minor or moderate stroke or on days 6 to 7 for major stroke; late DOAC initiation was on days 3 to 4 for minor stroke, days 6 to 7 for moderate stroke, and days 12 to 14 for major stroke.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, extracranial bleeding, systemic embolism, or vascular death within 30 days. The outcome was assessed according to infarct size (minor, moderate, or major) using odds ratios and risk differences between treatment arms. Interrater reliability for infarct size between the core laboratory and local raters was assessed, and whether this modified the estimated treatment effects was also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1962 of the original 2013 participants (909 [46.3%] female; median [IQR] age, 77 [70-84] years) were included. The primary outcome occurred in 10 of 371 participants (2.7%) with early DOAC initiation vs 11 of 364 (3.0%) with late DOAC initiation among those with minor stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.38-2.10); in 11 of 388 (2.8%) with early DOAC initiation vs 14 of 392 (3.6%) with late DOAC initiation among those with moderate stroke (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.35-1.74); and in 8 of 219 (3.7%) with early DOAC initiation vs 16 of 228 (7.0%) with late DOAC initiation among those with major stroke (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.21-1.18). The 95% CI for the estimated risk difference of the primary outcome in early anticoagulation was -2.78% to 2.12% for minor stroke, -3.23% to 1.76% for moderate stroke, and -7.49% to 0.81% for major stroke. There was no significant treatment interaction for the primary outcome. For infarct size, interrater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.675; 95% CI, 0.647-0.702) for local vs core laboratory raters and strong (κ = 0.875; 95% CI, 0.855-0.894) between core laboratory raters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The treatment effect of early DOAC initiation did not differ in people wi
重要性:对于缺血性卒中合并心房颤动患者,心梗大小是否会改变早期与晚期直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的治疗效果尚不清楚:评估梗死面积是否会改变早期与晚期开始使用 DOAC 的安全性和有效性:对跨国(15 个国家超过 100 个研究机构)随机临床试验 "房颤卒中早期抗凝与晚期抗凝"(ELAN)的参与者进行事后分析,这些参与者(1)患有急性缺血性卒中;(2)患有心房颤动;(3)在随机化前已获得脑成像。ELAN试验于2017年10月至2022年12月期间进行。在本次事后分析中,对2023年10月至12月的数据进行了分析:干预措施:缺血性卒中后早期与晚期开始使用 DOAC。轻度或中度卒中患者在48小时内或重度卒中患者在第6至7天开始使用DOAC;轻度卒中患者在第3至4天开始使用DOAC,中度卒中患者在第6至7天开始使用DOAC,重度卒中患者在第12至14天开始使用DOAC:主要结果是30天内复发缺血性卒中、症状性颅内出血、颅外出血、全身性栓塞或血管性死亡的复合结果。根据梗死大小(轻度、中度或重度),采用几率比和治疗组之间的风险差异对结果进行评估。评估了核心实验室和当地评定者对梗死面积的相互间可靠性,并研究了这是否会改变估计的治疗效果:在最初的 2013 名参与者中,共有 1962 人(909 [46.3%] 名女性;中位数[IQR]年龄为 77 [70-84] 岁)被纳入研究。在轻微中风患者中,早期开始使用 DOAC 的 371 位参与者中有 10 位(2.7%)出现了主要结果,而晚期开始使用 DOAC 的 364 位参与者中有 11 位(3.0%)出现了主要结果(几率比 [OR],0.89;95% CI,0.38-2.10);在早期开始使用 DOAC 的 388 位参与者中有 11 位(2.8%)出现了主要结果,而晚期开始使用 DOAC 的 392 位参与者中有 14 位(3.6%)出现了主要结果。在中度卒中患者中,早期使用 DOAC 的 388 例中有 11 例(2.8%)与晚期使用 DOAC 的 392 例中有 14 例(3.6%)相比(OR,0.80;95% CI,0.35-1.74);在重度卒中患者中,早期使用 DOAC 的 219 例中有 8 例(3.7%)与晚期使用 DOAC 的 228 例中有 16 例(7.0%)相比(OR,0.52;95% CI,0.21-1.18)。轻度卒中早期抗凝的主要结局估计风险差异的 95% CI 为 -2.78% 至 2.12%,中度卒中为 -3.23% 至 1.76%,重度卒中为 -7.49% 至 0.81%。在主要结果方面,治疗间无明显交互作用。就梗死面积而言,本地与核心实验室评分者之间的评分间可靠性为中等(κ = 0.675; 95% CI, 0.647-0.702),核心实验室评分者之间的评分间可靠性为强(κ = 0.875; 95% CI, 0.855-0.894):在脑成像评估的轻度、中度或重度卒中患者中,早期启动 DOAC 的治疗效果没有差异。对于任何梗塞大小的脑卒中,包括重度脑卒中,早期治疗与不良事件发生率升高无关,尤其是无症状性颅内出血:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03148457。
{"title":"Early vs Late Anticoagulation in Minor, Moderate, and Major Ischemic Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation: Post Hoc Analysis of the ELAN Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Martina B Goeldlin, Arsany Hakim, Mattia Branca, Stefanie Abend, Markus Kneihsl, Waldo Valenzuela Pinilla, Sabine Fenzl, Beata Rezny-Kasprzak, Roman Rohner, Daniel Strbian, Maurizio Paciaroni, Goetz Thomalla, Patrik Michel, Krassen Nedeltchev, Thomas Gattringer, Else Charlotte Sandset, Leo Bonati, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, P N Sylaja, George Ntaios, Masatoshi Koga, Zuzana Gdovinova, Robin Lemmens, Natan M Bornstein, Peter Kelly, Mira Katan, Thomas Horvath, Jesse Dawson, Urs Fischer","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1450","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1450","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Whether infarct size modifies the treatment effect of early vs late direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) initiation in people with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation is unknown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess whether infarct size modifies the safety and efficacy of early vs late DOAC initiation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;Post hoc analysis of participants from the multinational (&gt;100 sites in 15 countries) randomized clinical Early Versus Later Anticoagulation for Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation (ELAN) trial who had (1) acute ischemic stroke, (2) atrial fibrillation, and (3) brain imaging available before randomization. The ELAN trial was conducted between October 2017 and December 2022. Data were analyzed from October to December 2023 for this post hoc analysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Intervention: &lt;/strong&gt;Early vs late DOAC initiation after ischemic stroke. Early DOAC initiation was within 48 hours for minor or moderate stroke or on days 6 to 7 for major stroke; late DOAC initiation was on days 3 to 4 for minor stroke, days 6 to 7 for moderate stroke, and days 12 to 14 for major stroke.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, extracranial bleeding, systemic embolism, or vascular death within 30 days. The outcome was assessed according to infarct size (minor, moderate, or major) using odds ratios and risk differences between treatment arms. Interrater reliability for infarct size between the core laboratory and local raters was assessed, and whether this modified the estimated treatment effects was also examined.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 1962 of the original 2013 participants (909 [46.3%] female; median [IQR] age, 77 [70-84] years) were included. The primary outcome occurred in 10 of 371 participants (2.7%) with early DOAC initiation vs 11 of 364 (3.0%) with late DOAC initiation among those with minor stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.38-2.10); in 11 of 388 (2.8%) with early DOAC initiation vs 14 of 392 (3.6%) with late DOAC initiation among those with moderate stroke (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.35-1.74); and in 8 of 219 (3.7%) with early DOAC initiation vs 16 of 228 (7.0%) with late DOAC initiation among those with major stroke (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.21-1.18). The 95% CI for the estimated risk difference of the primary outcome in early anticoagulation was -2.78% to 2.12% for minor stroke, -3.23% to 1.76% for moderate stroke, and -7.49% to 0.81% for major stroke. There was no significant treatment interaction for the primary outcome. For infarct size, interrater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.675; 95% CI, 0.647-0.702) for local vs core laboratory raters and strong (κ = 0.875; 95% CI, 0.855-0.894) between core laboratory raters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;The treatment effect of early DOAC initiation did not differ in people wi","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11134281/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Semantic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia With Glycine Receptor α1 Autoantibodies. 伴有甘氨酸受体α1自身抗体的原发性进行性失语症语义变体
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0590
Yufei Chen, Cuibai Wei
{"title":"Semantic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia With Glycine Receptor α1 Autoantibodies.","authors":"Yufei Chen, Cuibai Wei","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0590","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0590","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140335697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Error in Additional Contributions. 额外会费中的错误。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1355
{"title":"Error in Additional Contributions.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1355","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1355","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11074926/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140850274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Access to First-Seizure Clinics, Subsequent Outcomes, and Factors Associated With Attendance. 首次癫痫发作门诊的早期就诊、后续疗效以及就诊相关因素。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1187
Yingtong Li, Tianrui Ren, Michael Burgess, Zhibin Chen, Patrick W Carney, Terence J O'Brien, Patrick Kwan, Emma Foster

Importance: First-seizure clinics (FSCs) aim to deliver prompt specialist care to patients with new-onset undifferentiated seizure events.

Objective: To determine whether FSC attendance and time to FSC are associated with subsequent health care utilization and mortality and to investigate factors associated with FSC nonattendance.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a record-linkage, retrospective, cohort study of patients who booked appointments at 2 FSCs between 2007 and 2018. Patients' records were linked to state-wide administrative databases between 2000 and 2021. The setting comprised the FSCs of 2 major metropolitan public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, providing national inpatient and outpatient adult epilepsy services. Of patients who booked appointments at the FSCs, those who were successfully linked for analysis were included in the study. Patients who recorded only canceled appointments were excluded from analysis of outcomes. Study data were analyzed from January 2000 to December 2021.

Exposure: FSC attendance.

Main outcomes and measures: Subsequent all-cause and seizure-related emergency department (ED) presentations and hospital admissions.

Results: Of 10 162 patients with appointments at FSCs, 9392 were linked for analysis, with mean (SD) follow-up time 6.9 (2.8) years after FSC referral. A total of 703 patients were excluded. Among 9392 linked patients, 5398 were male (57.5%; mean [SD] age, 59.7 [11.2] years). FSC attendance was associated with reduced subsequent all-cause emergency presentations (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66-0.79) and all-cause hospitalization (aIRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88). Those who attended at the first-scheduled appointment, compared with those who attended only a rescheduled, delayed appointment, had reduced subsequent all-cause emergency presentations (aIRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91), all-cause hospitalization (aIRR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.79), seizure-related presentations (aIRR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.33-0.49), and mortality (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98). Male sex was associated with nonattendance (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22), as were injury at emergency presentation (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24), psychiatric comorbidity (aRR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.55-1.81), previous seizure-related presentations (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22-1.49), and delays (>14 days) between FSC referral and appointment (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.18-1.54). Hospitalization at referral was associated with reduced nonattendance (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90), as were non-English language preference (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94), distance greater than 6 mi from home to clinic (aRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), and physical comorbidity (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.89).

Conclusions and relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest tha

重要性:首次癫痫发作门诊(FSC)旨在为新发无差别癫痫发作患者提供及时的专科治疗:确定首次发作门诊的就诊率和就诊时间是否与随后的医疗服务使用率和死亡率相关,并调查与未就诊首次发作门诊相关的因素:这是一项记录链接、回顾性队列研究,研究对象是 2007 年至 2018 年期间在 2 家家庭服务中心预约的患者。患者的记录与 2000 年至 2021 年间的全州行政数据库进行了链接。研究地点包括澳大利亚墨尔本两家大型都市公立医院的家庭服务中心,这两家医院提供全国性的成人癫痫住院和门诊服务。在家庭服务中心预约就诊的患者中,成功连接以进行分析的患者被纳入研究范围。仅有取消预约记录的患者不纳入结果分析。研究数据分析时间为2000年1月至2021年12月:主要结果和测量指标主要结果和测量指标:随后的全因和发作相关急诊科(ED)就诊和入院情况:结果:在10 162名预约到家庭服务中心就诊的患者中,有9392人被纳入分析范围,平均(标度)随访时间为家庭服务中心转诊后的6.9(2.8)年。共有 703 名患者被排除在外。在 9392 名关联患者中,5398 人为男性(57.5%;平均 [SD] 年龄为 59.7 [11.2] 岁)。到家庭服务中心就诊可减少随后的全因急诊就诊率(调整后发病率比 [aIRR],0.72;95% CI,0.66-0.79)和全因住院率(aIRR,0.81;95% CI,0.75-0.88)。与只参加重新安排的延迟预约的患者相比,在首次预约时就诊的患者减少了随后的全因急诊就诊率(aIRR,0.83;95% CI,0.76-0.91)、全因住院率(aIRR,0.71;95% CI,0.65-0.79)、癫痫发作相关就诊率(aIRR,0.40;95% CI,0.33-0.49)和死亡率(危险比,0.82;95% CI,0.69-0.98)。男性性别与不就诊相关(调整后相对风险 [aRR],1.12;95% CI,1.03-1.22),急诊就诊时受伤(aRR,1.12;95% CI,1.01-1.24)、精神病合并症(aRR,1.68;95% CI,1.55-1.81)、既往癫痫发作相关病史(aRR,1.35;95% CI,1.22-1.49)以及家庭支持中心转诊与预约之间的延迟(>14 天)(aRR,1.35;95% CI,1.18-1.54)。转诊时住院与未就诊率降低有关(aRR,0.80;95% CI,0.72-0.90),与非英语语言偏好(aRR,0.81;95% CI,0.69-0.94)、从家庭到诊所的距离超过 6 英里(aRR,0.85;95% CI,0.76-0.95)和身体合并症(aRR,0.80;95% CI,0.72-0.89)也有关:这项队列研究的结果表明,参加家庭支持中心,尤其是尽早参加,与随后的住院率降低有关。这方面的知识可能有助于为家庭服务中心提供充足的资源,以改善公平、及时的就医环境。未来的研究方向包括评估可支持高危人群参加家庭服务中心的干预措施。
{"title":"Early Access to First-Seizure Clinics, Subsequent Outcomes, and Factors Associated With Attendance.","authors":"Yingtong Li, Tianrui Ren, Michael Burgess, Zhibin Chen, Patrick W Carney, Terence J O'Brien, Patrick Kwan, Emma Foster","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1187","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>First-seizure clinics (FSCs) aim to deliver prompt specialist care to patients with new-onset undifferentiated seizure events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether FSC attendance and time to FSC are associated with subsequent health care utilization and mortality and to investigate factors associated with FSC nonattendance.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a record-linkage, retrospective, cohort study of patients who booked appointments at 2 FSCs between 2007 and 2018. Patients' records were linked to state-wide administrative databases between 2000 and 2021. The setting comprised the FSCs of 2 major metropolitan public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, providing national inpatient and outpatient adult epilepsy services. Of patients who booked appointments at the FSCs, those who were successfully linked for analysis were included in the study. Patients who recorded only canceled appointments were excluded from analysis of outcomes. Study data were analyzed from January 2000 to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>FSC attendance.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Subsequent all-cause and seizure-related emergency department (ED) presentations and hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10 162 patients with appointments at FSCs, 9392 were linked for analysis, with mean (SD) follow-up time 6.9 (2.8) years after FSC referral. A total of 703 patients were excluded. Among 9392 linked patients, 5398 were male (57.5%; mean [SD] age, 59.7 [11.2] years). FSC attendance was associated with reduced subsequent all-cause emergency presentations (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66-0.79) and all-cause hospitalization (aIRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88). Those who attended at the first-scheduled appointment, compared with those who attended only a rescheduled, delayed appointment, had reduced subsequent all-cause emergency presentations (aIRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91), all-cause hospitalization (aIRR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.79), seizure-related presentations (aIRR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.33-0.49), and mortality (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98). Male sex was associated with nonattendance (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22), as were injury at emergency presentation (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24), psychiatric comorbidity (aRR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.55-1.81), previous seizure-related presentations (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22-1.49), and delays (>14 days) between FSC referral and appointment (aRR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.18-1.54). Hospitalization at referral was associated with reduced nonattendance (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90), as were non-English language preference (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94), distance greater than 6 mi from home to clinic (aRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), and physical comorbidity (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of this cohort study suggest tha","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11117147/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141081289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time Windows Between Symptom Onset and Treatment-An Outdated Myth. 症状发作与治疗之间的时间窗口--过时的神话。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1370
Louis R Caplan
{"title":"Time Windows Between Symptom Onset and Treatment-An Outdated Myth.","authors":"Louis R Caplan","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1370","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1370","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA neurology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1