首页 > 最新文献

JAMA neurology最新文献

英文 中文
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and Nontraumatic Subdural Hemorrhage-Reply. 脑淀粉样血管病和非创伤性硬膜下出血--回复。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1598
Cyprien A Rivier, Guido J Falcone, Santosh B Murthy
{"title":"Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and Nontraumatic Subdural Hemorrhage-Reply.","authors":"Cyprien A Rivier, Guido J Falcone, Santosh B Murthy","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1598","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1598","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141296020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation While Receiving Oral Anticoagulants. 接受口服抗凝剂治疗的心房颤动患者复发缺血性中风。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1892
Mette Foldager Hindsholm, Luis Alberto García Rodríguez, Axel Brandes, Jesper Hallas, Birgit Bjerre Høyer, Sören Möller, Mahmut Edip Gurol, Claus Ziegler Simonsen, David Gaist

Importance: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) can have an ischemic stroke (IS) despite oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment. Knowledge regarding the association between OAC discontinuation and the subsequent risk of recurrent IS in patients with AF is limited.

Objectives: To determine the risk of recurrent IS in patients with AF receiving OAC and to evaluate the association between OAC discontinuation and the risk of recurrent IS.

Design, setting, and participants: This is a nationwide cohort study of patients aged 50 years or older in Denmark who had AF and an IS (entry IS) and were initiating or restarting subsequent OAC treatment after being discharged between January 2014 and December 2021. Patients were followed up for recurrent IS until June 2022. Within this study cohort, a nested case-control analysis was performed in which patients with recurrent IS were matched to patients receiving OAC who had not yet experienced a stroke. Data were analyzed from May 25, 2023, to April 18, 2024.

Exposure: Use of OAC at the time of recurrent IS or the equivalent date in matched controls based on redeemed prescriptions.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was recurrent IS. Crude and adjusted cumulative incidences of recurrent IS and all-cause mortality were calculated in cohort analyses, and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were determined for recurrent IS associated with OAC discontinuation in nested case-control analyses.

Results: The study cohort included 8119 patients (4392 [54.1%] male; mean [SD] age, 78.4 [9.6] years; median (IQR) CHA2DS2-VASc score, 4.0 [3.0-5.0]). Over a mean (SD) follow-up of 2.9 (2.2) years, 663 patients had a recurrent IS, of whom 533 (80.4%) were receiving OAC at the time of their recurrent IS. The crude cumulative incidence of recurrent IS at 1 year was 4.3% (95% CI, 5.9%-7.1%), and the crude cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 15.4% (95% CI, 14.7%-16.2%). Adjusted analysis showed similar results. Patients who discontinued OACs had a higher risk of recurrent IS (89 cases [13.4%], 180 controls [6.8%]; aOR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.57-2.89) compared with patients still receiving OAC.

Conclusions and relevance: The risks of recurrent IS and mortality were high in patients with AF despite secondary prevention with OAC, and OAC discontinuation doubled the risk of recurrent IS compared with patients who continued OAC. This finding highlights the importance of OAC continuation and the need for improved secondary stroke prevention in patients with AF.

重要性:尽管接受了口服抗凝剂(OAC)治疗,心房颤动(AF)患者仍可能发生缺血性卒中(IS)。有关停用 OAC 与心房颤动患者随后复发 IS 风险之间关系的知识还很有限:确定接受 OAC 治疗的房颤患者复发 IS 的风险,并评估停用 OAC 与复发 IS 风险之间的关联:这是一项全国性的队列研究,研究对象为丹麦 50 岁或以上的房颤患者,这些患者在 2014 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间患有房颤和 IS(入组 IS),并在出院后开始或重新开始后续的 OAC 治疗。在 2022 年 6 月之前,对复发 IS 的患者进行随访。在该研究队列中进行了嵌套病例对照分析,将复发性 IS 患者与接受 OAC 但尚未发生卒中的患者进行配对。数据分析时间为 2023 年 5 月 25 日至 2024 年 4 月 18 日。暴露:根据兑换的处方,在复发性 IS 发生时或匹配对照的同等日期使用 OAC:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果是复发性 IS。在队列分析中计算复发性IS和全因死亡率的粗略和调整后累积发生率,在嵌套病例对照分析中确定复发性IS与停用OAC相关的调整后几率比(aORs):研究队列包括 8119 名患者(男性 4392 [54.1%];平均 [SD] 年龄 78.4 [9.6] 岁;CHA2DS2-VASc 评分中位数(IQR)4.0 [3.0-5.0])。在平均(标清)2.9(2.2)年的随访期间,663 名患者复发了 IS,其中 533 人(80.4%)在复发 IS 时正在接受 OAC 治疗。1 年后复发 IS 的粗累计发生率为 4.3%(95% CI,5.9%-7.1%),全因死亡率的粗累计发生率为 15.4%(95% CI,14.7%-16.2%)。调整分析显示了类似的结果。与仍在接受 OAC 的患者相比,停用 OAC 的患者复发 IS 的风险更高(89 例 [13.4%],180 例对照 [6.8%];aOR,2.13;95% CI,1.57-2.89):尽管使用 OAC 进行二级预防,但房颤患者复发 IS 和死亡的风险很高,与继续使用 OAC 的患者相比,停用 OAC 会使复发 IS 的风险增加一倍。这一发现强调了继续使用 OAC 的重要性以及改善房颤患者卒中二级预防的必要性。
{"title":"Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation While Receiving Oral Anticoagulants.","authors":"Mette Foldager Hindsholm, Luis Alberto García Rodríguez, Axel Brandes, Jesper Hallas, Birgit Bjerre Høyer, Sören Möller, Mahmut Edip Gurol, Claus Ziegler Simonsen, David Gaist","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1892","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1892","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) can have an ischemic stroke (IS) despite oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment. Knowledge regarding the association between OAC discontinuation and the subsequent risk of recurrent IS in patients with AF is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the risk of recurrent IS in patients with AF receiving OAC and to evaluate the association between OAC discontinuation and the risk of recurrent IS.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This is a nationwide cohort study of patients aged 50 years or older in Denmark who had AF and an IS (entry IS) and were initiating or restarting subsequent OAC treatment after being discharged between January 2014 and December 2021. Patients were followed up for recurrent IS until June 2022. Within this study cohort, a nested case-control analysis was performed in which patients with recurrent IS were matched to patients receiving OAC who had not yet experienced a stroke. Data were analyzed from May 25, 2023, to April 18, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Use of OAC at the time of recurrent IS or the equivalent date in matched controls based on redeemed prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was recurrent IS. Crude and adjusted cumulative incidences of recurrent IS and all-cause mortality were calculated in cohort analyses, and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were determined for recurrent IS associated with OAC discontinuation in nested case-control analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 8119 patients (4392 [54.1%] male; mean [SD] age, 78.4 [9.6] years; median (IQR) CHA2DS2-VASc score, 4.0 [3.0-5.0]). Over a mean (SD) follow-up of 2.9 (2.2) years, 663 patients had a recurrent IS, of whom 533 (80.4%) were receiving OAC at the time of their recurrent IS. The crude cumulative incidence of recurrent IS at 1 year was 4.3% (95% CI, 5.9%-7.1%), and the crude cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 15.4% (95% CI, 14.7%-16.2%). Adjusted analysis showed similar results. Patients who discontinued OACs had a higher risk of recurrent IS (89 cases [13.4%], 180 controls [6.8%]; aOR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.57-2.89) compared with patients still receiving OAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The risks of recurrent IS and mortality were high in patients with AF despite secondary prevention with OAC, and OAC discontinuation doubled the risk of recurrent IS compared with patients who continued OAC. This finding highlights the importance of OAC continuation and the need for improved secondary stroke prevention in patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197012/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Errors in Table 1 and Figure 2. 误差见表 1 和图 2。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2195
{"title":"Errors in Table 1 and Figure 2.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2195","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2195","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217883/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141467953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Zoey's First Haircut. 佐伊的第一次理发
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1217
Eunice Stallman
{"title":"Zoey's First Haircut.","authors":"Eunice Stallman","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1217","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1217","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140911765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tau Positron Emission Tomography for Predicting Dementia in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment. 用于预测轻度认知障碍患者痴呆症的 Tau 正电子发射断层扫描。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1612
Colin Groot, Ruben Smith, Lyduine E Collij, Sophie E Mastenbroek, Erik Stomrud, Alexa Pichet Binette, Antoine Leuzy, Sebastian Palmqvist, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren, Olof Strandberg, Hanna Cho, Chul Hyoung Lyoo, Giovanni B Frisoni, Debora E Peretti, Valentina Garibotto, Renaud La Joie, David N Soleimani-Meigooni, Gil Rabinovici, Rik Ossenkoppele, Oskar Hansson

Importance: An accurate prognosis is especially pertinent in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), when individuals experience considerable uncertainty about future progression.

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of tau positron emission tomography (PET) to predict clinical progression from MCI to dementia.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a multicenter cohort study with external validation and a mean (SD) follow-up of 2.0 (1.1) years. Data were collected from centers in South Korea, Sweden, the US, and Switzerland from June 2014 to January 2024. Participant data were retrospectively collected and inclusion criteria were a baseline clinical diagnosis of MCI; longitudinal clinical follow-up; a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 22; and available tau PET, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan less than 1 year from diagnosis. A total of 448 eligible individuals with MCI were included (331 in the discovery cohort and 117 in the validation cohort). None of these participants were excluded over the course of the study.

Exposures: Tau PET, Aβ PET, and MRI.

Main outcomes and measures: Positive results on tau PET (temporal meta-region of interest), Aβ PET (global; expressed in the standardized metric Centiloids), and MRI (Alzheimer disease [AD] signature region) was assessed using quantitative thresholds and visual reads. Clinical progression from MCI to all-cause dementia (regardless of suspected etiology) or to AD dementia (AD as suspected etiology) served as the primary outcomes. The primary analyses were receiver operating characteristics.

Results: In the discovery cohort, the mean (SD) age was 70.9 (8.5) years, 191 (58%) were male, the mean (SD) MMSE score was 27.1 (1.9), and 110 individuals with MCI (33%) converted to dementia (71 to AD dementia). Only the model with tau PET predicted all-cause dementia (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80) better than a base model including age, sex, education, and MMSE score (AUC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.77; P = .02), while the models assessing the other neuroimaging markers did not improve prediction. In the validation cohort, tau PET replicated in predicting all-cause dementia. Compared to the base model (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82), prediction of AD dementia in the discovery cohort was significantly improved by including tau PET (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.89; P < .001), tau PET visual read (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88; P = .001), and Aβ PET Centiloids (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88; P = .03). In the validation cohort, only the tau PET and the tau PET visual reads replicated in predicting AD dementia.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, tau-PET showed the best performance as a stand-alone marker to predict progression to dementia among individu

重要性:准确的预后对轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者尤为重要,因为患者对未来的病情发展具有很大的不确定性:评估tau正电子发射断层扫描(PET)的预后价值,以预测从MCI到痴呆的临床进展:这是一项经外部验证的多中心队列研究,平均(标清)随访 2.0 (1.1) 年。数据收集自韩国、瑞典、美国和瑞士的研究中心,时间为 2014 年 6 月至 2024 年 1 月。参与者的数据是回顾性收集的,纳入标准是基线临床诊断为 MCI;纵向临床随访;迷你精神状态检查 (MMSE) 得分大于 22 分;自诊断起不到 1 年的 tau PET、淀粉样蛋白-β (Aβ) PET 和磁共振成像 (MRI) 扫描可用。共纳入了 448 名符合条件的 MCI 患者(其中 331 人属于发现队列,117 人属于验证队列)。在研究过程中,没有一人被排除在外:主要结果和测量指标:采用定量阈值和目测读数评估 tau PET(感兴趣的颞元区)、Aβ PET(全局;以标准化指标 Centiloids 表示)和 MRI(阿尔茨海默病 [AD] 特征区)的阳性结果。从 MCI 到全因痴呆(无论疑似病因)或 AD 痴呆(疑似病因为 AD)的临床进展为主要结果。主要分析是接收器操作特征:在发现队列中,平均(标清)年龄为 70.9 (8.5)岁,191 人(58%)为男性,平均(标清)MMSE 得分为 27.1 (1.9),110 名 MCI 患者(33%)转为痴呆(71 人转为 AD 痴呆)。与包括年龄、性别、教育程度和 MMSE 评分的基础模型(AUC,0.71;95% CI,0.65-0.77;P = .02)相比,只有 tau PET 模型能更好地预测全因痴呆(接收器操作特征曲线下面积 [AUC],0.75;95% CI,0.70-0.80),而评估其他神经影像标记物的模型并不能提高预测效果。在验证队列中,tau PET 也能预测全因痴呆。与基础模型(AUC,0.75;95% CI,0.69-0.82)相比,加入 tau PET 后,发现队列中的 AD 痴呆预测能力显著提高(AUC,0.84;95% CI,0.79-0.89;P 结论和意义:在这项研究中,tau-PET作为预测MCI患者痴呆进展的独立标记物表现最佳。这表明,就 MCI 的预后而言,tau PET 扫描可能是目前最好的神经影像标记物。
{"title":"Tau Positron Emission Tomography for Predicting Dementia in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Colin Groot, Ruben Smith, Lyduine E Collij, Sophie E Mastenbroek, Erik Stomrud, Alexa Pichet Binette, Antoine Leuzy, Sebastian Palmqvist, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren, Olof Strandberg, Hanna Cho, Chul Hyoung Lyoo, Giovanni B Frisoni, Debora E Peretti, Valentina Garibotto, Renaud La Joie, David N Soleimani-Meigooni, Gil Rabinovici, Rik Ossenkoppele, Oskar Hansson","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1612","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1612","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>An accurate prognosis is especially pertinent in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), when individuals experience considerable uncertainty about future progression.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the prognostic value of tau positron emission tomography (PET) to predict clinical progression from MCI to dementia.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a multicenter cohort study with external validation and a mean (SD) follow-up of 2.0 (1.1) years. Data were collected from centers in South Korea, Sweden, the US, and Switzerland from June 2014 to January 2024. Participant data were retrospectively collected and inclusion criteria were a baseline clinical diagnosis of MCI; longitudinal clinical follow-up; a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 22; and available tau PET, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan less than 1 year from diagnosis. A total of 448 eligible individuals with MCI were included (331 in the discovery cohort and 117 in the validation cohort). None of these participants were excluded over the course of the study.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Tau PET, Aβ PET, and MRI.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Positive results on tau PET (temporal meta-region of interest), Aβ PET (global; expressed in the standardized metric Centiloids), and MRI (Alzheimer disease [AD] signature region) was assessed using quantitative thresholds and visual reads. Clinical progression from MCI to all-cause dementia (regardless of suspected etiology) or to AD dementia (AD as suspected etiology) served as the primary outcomes. The primary analyses were receiver operating characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the discovery cohort, the mean (SD) age was 70.9 (8.5) years, 191 (58%) were male, the mean (SD) MMSE score was 27.1 (1.9), and 110 individuals with MCI (33%) converted to dementia (71 to AD dementia). Only the model with tau PET predicted all-cause dementia (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80) better than a base model including age, sex, education, and MMSE score (AUC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.77; P = .02), while the models assessing the other neuroimaging markers did not improve prediction. In the validation cohort, tau PET replicated in predicting all-cause dementia. Compared to the base model (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82), prediction of AD dementia in the discovery cohort was significantly improved by including tau PET (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.89; P < .001), tau PET visual read (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88; P = .001), and Aβ PET Centiloids (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88; P = .03). In the validation cohort, only the tau PET and the tau PET visual reads replicated in predicting AD dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, tau-PET showed the best performance as a stand-alone marker to predict progression to dementia among individu","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165418/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141296022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parental History of Memory Impairment and β-Amyloid in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults. 认知功能未受损的老年人的父母记忆受损史和β-淀粉样蛋白。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1763
Mabel Seto, Timothy J Hohman, Elizabeth C Mormino, Kathryn V Papp, Rebecca E Amariglio, Dorene M Rentz, Keith A Johnson, Aaron P Schultz, Reisa A Sperling, Rachel F Buckley, Hyun-Sik Yang
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Studies have suggested that maternal history of late-onset Alzheimer disease, but not paternal, predisposes individuals to higher brain β-amyloid (Aβ) burden, reduced brain metabolism, and lower gray matter volumes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize maternal vs paternal history of memory impairment in terms of brain Aβ-positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) and baseline cognition among a large sample of cognitively unimpaired older adults.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study leveraged data from 4413 individuals who were screened for the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer (A4) study, a randomized clinical trial conducted across 67 sites in the US, Australia, Canada, and Japan aimed at Alzheimer disease prevention. Data were collected between April 2014 and December 2017 and analyzed from December 2022 to June 2023. Participants were cognitively unimpaired adults (Clinical Dementia Rating = 0 and/or Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥25) between the ages of 65 and 85 years who underwent PET imaging to assess cortical Aβ levels for trial eligibility. A total of 4492 participants were screened, and 79 missing data were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Demographic characteristics (eg, age, sex, education), apolipoprotein E genotyping, participant-reported parental history of memory impairment and parental age at symptom onset were collected as variables. Parental history was assessed in terms of continuous neocortical 18F-florbetapir Aβ-PET and the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4413 individuals (mean [SD] age, 71.27 [4.66] years, 2617 women [59.3%]), mean Aβ-PET was elevated in individuals with history of memory impairment in both parents (n = 455; mean [SD] standardized uptake value ratio [SUVR] = 1.12 [0.19]; Wilcoxon P = 1.1 × 10-5) and in those with only maternal history (n = 1772; mean [SD] SUVR = 1.10 [0.19]; Wilcoxon P = 2.70 × 10-5) compared with those with only paternal history (n = 632; mean [SD] SUVR = 1.08 [0.18]; Wilcoxon P = 1.1 × 10-5) or no family history (n = 1554; mean [SD] SUVR = 1.08 [0.19]; Wilcoxon P = 1.1 × 10-5). Paternal history of early-onset memory impairment (age <65 years) but not late-onset (age ≥65 years) was associated with elevated participant Aβ-PET (mean [SD] SUVR = 1.19 [0.21]; P = 3.00 × 10-6) in comparison with no paternal history (mean [SD] SUVR = 1.09 [0.19]) whereas maternal history was associated with elevated Aβ in both early-onset and late-onset groups. There was no association with cognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, maternal history (at any age) and paternal history of early-onset memory impairment were associated with Aβ burden among asymptomatic older individuals. Sex-specific parental history may help inform clinicians on likelihood of Aβ burden in offspring and help identify hig
重要性:研究表明,母系(而非父系)有晚发阿尔兹海默病史的人易患脑β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)负荷较高、脑代谢降低和灰质体积较小的疾病:从脑 Aβ-正电子发射断层扫描(Aβ-PET)和基线认知的角度来描述母系与父系记忆障碍史的特征:该研究是一项随机临床试验,在美国、澳大利亚、加拿大和日本的 67 个地点进行,旨在预防阿尔茨海默病。数据收集时间为 2014 年 4 月至 2017 年 12 月,分析时间为 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 6 月。参与者均为认知功能未受损的成年人(临床痴呆评级=0和/或迷你精神状态检查得分≥25),年龄在65岁至85岁之间,他们接受了PET成像以评估皮质Aβ水平,以获得试验资格。共筛选出 4492 名参与者,排除了 79 名数据缺失者:收集人口统计学特征(如年龄、性别、教育程度)、载脂蛋白 E 基因分型、参与者报告的父母记忆障碍史和父母发病年龄等变量。父母病史通过连续的新皮质18F-氟贝他嘧啶Aβ-PET和临床前阿尔茨海默氏症认知综合征进行评估:在4413名个体(平均[标码]年龄为71.27[4.66]岁,2617名女性[59.3%])中,父母双方均有记忆障碍病史者的平均Aβ-PET升高(n = 455;平均[标码]标准化摄取值比[SUVR] = 1.12 [0.19];Wilcoxon P = 1.1 × 10-5),仅有母亲病史者的平均Aβ-PET升高(n = 1772;平均[标码]SUVR = 1.10[0.19];Wilcoxon P = 2.70 × 10-5)与仅有父系病史者(n = 632;平均[标码] SUVR = 1.08 [0.18];Wilcoxon P = 1.1 × 10-5)或无家族病史者(n = 1554;平均[标码] SUVR = 1.08 [0.19];Wilcoxon P = 1.1 × 10-5)相比。父系早发记忆障碍病史(年龄结论及相关性:在这项研究中,无症状老年人的母系病史(任何年龄)和父系早发记忆障碍病史与 Aβ 负担有关。父母的性别特异性病史可帮助临床医生了解后代出现 Aβ 负担的可能性,并有助于在疾病的早期阶段识别高危人群以进行预防。
{"title":"Parental History of Memory Impairment and β-Amyloid in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults.","authors":"Mabel Seto, Timothy J Hohman, Elizabeth C Mormino, Kathryn V Papp, Rebecca E Amariglio, Dorene M Rentz, Keith A Johnson, Aaron P Schultz, Reisa A Sperling, Rachel F Buckley, Hyun-Sik Yang","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1763","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1763","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Studies have suggested that maternal history of late-onset Alzheimer disease, but not paternal, predisposes individuals to higher brain β-amyloid (Aβ) burden, reduced brain metabolism, and lower gray matter volumes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To characterize maternal vs paternal history of memory impairment in terms of brain Aβ-positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) and baseline cognition among a large sample of cognitively unimpaired older adults.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This cross-sectional study leveraged data from 4413 individuals who were screened for the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer (A4) study, a randomized clinical trial conducted across 67 sites in the US, Australia, Canada, and Japan aimed at Alzheimer disease prevention. Data were collected between April 2014 and December 2017 and analyzed from December 2022 to June 2023. Participants were cognitively unimpaired adults (Clinical Dementia Rating = 0 and/or Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥25) between the ages of 65 and 85 years who underwent PET imaging to assess cortical Aβ levels for trial eligibility. A total of 4492 participants were screened, and 79 missing data were excluded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Demographic characteristics (eg, age, sex, education), apolipoprotein E genotyping, participant-reported parental history of memory impairment and parental age at symptom onset were collected as variables. Parental history was assessed in terms of continuous neocortical 18F-florbetapir Aβ-PET and the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Of 4413 individuals (mean [SD] age, 71.27 [4.66] years, 2617 women [59.3%]), mean Aβ-PET was elevated in individuals with history of memory impairment in both parents (n = 455; mean [SD] standardized uptake value ratio [SUVR] = 1.12 [0.19]; Wilcoxon P = 1.1 × 10-5) and in those with only maternal history (n = 1772; mean [SD] SUVR = 1.10 [0.19]; Wilcoxon P = 2.70 × 10-5) compared with those with only paternal history (n = 632; mean [SD] SUVR = 1.08 [0.18]; Wilcoxon P = 1.1 × 10-5) or no family history (n = 1554; mean [SD] SUVR = 1.08 [0.19]; Wilcoxon P = 1.1 × 10-5). Paternal history of early-onset memory impairment (age &lt;65 years) but not late-onset (age ≥65 years) was associated with elevated participant Aβ-PET (mean [SD] SUVR = 1.19 [0.21]; P = 3.00 × 10-6) in comparison with no paternal history (mean [SD] SUVR = 1.09 [0.19]) whereas maternal history was associated with elevated Aβ in both early-onset and late-onset groups. There was no association with cognition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;In this study, maternal history (at any age) and paternal history of early-onset memory impairment were associated with Aβ burden among asymptomatic older individuals. Sex-specific parental history may help inform clinicians on likelihood of Aβ burden in offspring and help identify hig","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11184498/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141330982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants and Antiseizure Medications for Atrial Fibrillation and Epilepsy and Risk of Thromboembolic Events. 治疗心房颤动和癫痫的直接作用口服抗凝剂和抗癫痫药物与血栓栓塞事件的风险。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2057
Emily K Acton, Sean Hennessy, Michael A Gelfand, Charles E Leonard, Warren B Bilker, Di Shu, Allison W Willis, Scott E Kasner

Importance: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly prescribed with antiseizure medications (ASMs) due to concurrency of and the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and epilepsy. However, enzyme-inducing (EI) ASMs may reduce absorption and accelerate metabolism of DOACs, potentially lowering DOAC levels and elevating thromboembolism risk.

Objective: To assess the rates of thromboembolic and major bleeding events in adults with AF and epilepsy dispensed DOACs and EI ASMs vs DOACs with non-EI ASMs.

Design, setting, and participants: This active-comparator, new-user cohort study included US health care data from the Clinformatics Data Mart database from October 2010 to September 2021 for a nationally representative population of adults with AF and epilepsy.

Exposure: Evaluations included episodes of contiguous coadministration of DOACs for AF with EI ASMs (exposed) or non-EI ASMs (referent) for epilepsy.

Main outcomes and measures: Thromboembolic events (primary outcome) and major bleeding events (secondary outcome) were identified based on a series of validated, diagnosis-based coding algorithms. Data-adaptive, high-dimensional propensity score matching was used to control for observed confounders and proxies for unobserved confounders. Adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with robust variance estimators to account for clustering within matched pairs.

Results: This study included 14 078 episodes (median age, 74 [IQR, 67-81]; 52.4% female) and 14 158 episodes (median age, 74 [IQR, 67-81]; 52.4% female) of incident DOAC and ASM use that met eligibility criteria for assessment of thromboembolic and major bleeding outcomes, respectively. Incidence was 88.5 per 1000 person-years for thromboembolic events and 68.3 per 1000 person-years for bleeding events. Compared with use of non-EI ASMs, use of EI ASMs with DOACs was not associated with a difference in risk of thromboembolic events (AHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.82-1.46) but was associated with a reduction in risk of major bleeding events (AHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.89).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, EI ASMs were not associated with alteration in DOAC efficacy. Further research is needed on the reduction in bleeding risk associated with EI ASMs, as this may suggest that pharmacokinetic interactions are associated with lowering DOAC levels without negating therapeutic effects.

重要性:由于心房颤动(AF)和癫痫之间的并发性和关联性,直接作用口服抗凝剂(DOAC)通常与抗癫痫药物(ASM)一起处方。然而,酶诱导型 ASMs 可能会减少 DOACs 的吸收并加速其代谢,从而可能降低 DOAC 的水平并增加血栓栓塞的风险:评估成人房颤和癫痫患者服用DOACs和EI ASMs与服用DOACs和非EI ASMs时的血栓栓塞和大出血事件发生率:这项主动比较者、新用户队列研究纳入了 Clinformatics Data Mart 数据库中 2010 年 10 月至 2021 年 9 月期间具有全国代表性的成人房颤和癫痫患者的美国医疗保健数据。暴露:评估包括连续联合使用治疗房颤的 DOACs 与治疗癫痫的 EI ASMs(暴露)或非 EI ASMs(参照):血栓栓塞事件(主要结果)和大出血事件(次要结果)是根据一系列经过验证的基于诊断的编码算法确定的。采用数据适应性高维倾向评分匹配来控制观察到的混杂因素和未观察到的混杂因素的替代物。使用带有稳健方差估计器的 Cox 比例危险回归模型估算了调整后的危险比(AHR),以考虑匹配对中的聚类情况:该研究纳入了 14 078 例(中位年龄 74 [IQR,67-81];52.4% 为女性)和 14 158 例(中位年龄 74 [IQR,67-81];52.4% 为女性)符合血栓栓塞和大出血结局评估资格标准的 DOAC 和 ASM 使用事件。血栓栓塞事件的发生率为每千人年 88.5 例,出血事件的发生率为每千人年 68.3 例。与使用非 EI ASMs 相比,使用 EI ASMs 和 DOACs 与血栓栓塞事件风险的差异不大(AHR,1.10;95% CI,0.82-1.46),但与大出血事件风险的降低有关(AHR,0.63;95% CI,0.44-0.89):在这项队列研究中,EI ASM 与 DOAC 疗效的改变无关。还需要对 EI ASMs 降低出血风险进行进一步研究,因为这可能表明药代动力学相互作用与降低 DOAC 水平有关,但不会否定治疗效果。
{"title":"Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants and Antiseizure Medications for Atrial Fibrillation and Epilepsy and Risk of Thromboembolic Events.","authors":"Emily K Acton, Sean Hennessy, Michael A Gelfand, Charles E Leonard, Warren B Bilker, Di Shu, Allison W Willis, Scott E Kasner","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2057","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly prescribed with antiseizure medications (ASMs) due to concurrency of and the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and epilepsy. However, enzyme-inducing (EI) ASMs may reduce absorption and accelerate metabolism of DOACs, potentially lowering DOAC levels and elevating thromboembolism risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the rates of thromboembolic and major bleeding events in adults with AF and epilepsy dispensed DOACs and EI ASMs vs DOACs with non-EI ASMs.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This active-comparator, new-user cohort study included US health care data from the Clinformatics Data Mart database from October 2010 to September 2021 for a nationally representative population of adults with AF and epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Evaluations included episodes of contiguous coadministration of DOACs for AF with EI ASMs (exposed) or non-EI ASMs (referent) for epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Thromboembolic events (primary outcome) and major bleeding events (secondary outcome) were identified based on a series of validated, diagnosis-based coding algorithms. Data-adaptive, high-dimensional propensity score matching was used to control for observed confounders and proxies for unobserved confounders. Adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with robust variance estimators to account for clustering within matched pairs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 14 078 episodes (median age, 74 [IQR, 67-81]; 52.4% female) and 14 158 episodes (median age, 74 [IQR, 67-81]; 52.4% female) of incident DOAC and ASM use that met eligibility criteria for assessment of thromboembolic and major bleeding outcomes, respectively. Incidence was 88.5 per 1000 person-years for thromboembolic events and 68.3 per 1000 person-years for bleeding events. Compared with use of non-EI ASMs, use of EI ASMs with DOACs was not associated with a difference in risk of thromboembolic events (AHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.82-1.46) but was associated with a reduction in risk of major bleeding events (AHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, EI ASMs were not associated with alteration in DOAC efficacy. Further research is needed on the reduction in bleeding risk associated with EI ASMs, as this may suggest that pharmacokinetic interactions are associated with lowering DOAC levels without negating therapeutic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231911/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Derivation and Validation of ICD-10 Codes for Identifying Incident Stroke. 用于识别突发脑卒中的 ICD-10 编码的推导和验证。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2044
Jesse A Columbo, Natalie Daya, Lisandro D Colantonio, Zhixin Wang, Kathryn Foti, Hyacinth I Hyacinth, Michelle C Johansen, Rebecca Gottesman, Phillip P Goodney, Virginia J Howard, Paul Muntner, Andrea L C Schneider, Elizabeth Selvin, Caitlin W Hicks
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Claims data with International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes are routinely used in clinical research. However, the use of ICD-10 codes to define incident stroke has not been validated against expert-adjudicated outcomes in the US population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate the accuracy of an ICD-10 code list to detect incident stroke events using Medicare inpatient fee-for-service claims data.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used data from 2 prospective population-based cohort studies, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, and included participants aged 65 years or older without prior stroke who had linked Medicare claims data. Stroke events in the ARIC and REGARDS studies were identified via active surveillance and adjudicated by expert review. Medicare-linked ARIC data (2016-2018) were used to develop a list of ICD-10 codes for incident stroke detection. The list was validated using Medicare-linked REGARDS data (2016-2019). Data were analyzed from September 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Stroke events detected in Medicare claims vs expert-adjudicated stroke events in the ARIC and REGARDS studies.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of incident stroke detection using ICD-10 codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the ARIC study, there were 110 adjudicated incident stroke events among 5194 participants (mean [SD] age, 80.1 [5.3] years) over a median follow-up of 3.0 (range, 0.003-3.0) years. Most ARIC participants were women (3160 [60.8%]); 993 (19.1%) were Black and 4180 (80.5%) were White. Using the primary diagnosis code on a Medicare billing claim, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 81.8% (95% CI, 73.3%-88.5%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 98.8%-99.3%) to detect incident stroke. Using any diagnosis code on a Medicare billing claim, the sensitivity was 94.5% (95% CI, 88.5%-98.0%) and the specificity was 98.4% (95% CI, 98.0%-98.8%). In the REGARDS study, there were 140 adjudicated incident strokes among 6359 participants (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.0] years) over a median follow-up of 4.0 (range, 0-4.0) years. More than half of the REGARDS participants were women (3351 [52.7%]); 1774 (27.9%) were Black and 4585 (72.1%) were White. For the primary diagnosis code, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 70.7% (95% CI, 63.2%-78.3%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 98.9%-99.4%). For any diagnosis code, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 77.9% (95% CI, 71.0%-84.7%) and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI, 98.6%-99.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These findings suggest that ICD-10 codes could be used to identify incident stroke events in Medicare claims with moderate sensi
重要性:带有国际疾病统计分类第十次修订版(ICD-10)代码的索赔数据被常规用于临床研究。然而,在美国人群中,使用 ICD-10 编码来定义卒中事件还没有经过专家判断结果的验证:目的:利用医疗保险住院病人付费服务理赔数据,开发并验证 ICD-10 编码列表检测卒中事件的准确性:这项队列研究使用了两项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究数据,即社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究和中风的地理和种族差异原因(REGARDS)研究,研究对象包括年龄在 65 岁或以上、未发生过中风且拥有联保报销数据的参与者。ARIC 和 REGARDS 研究中的卒中事件是通过主动监测发现的,并由专家审查裁定。与医疗保险挂钩的 ARIC 数据(2016-2018 年)被用于制定用于检测卒中事件的 ICD-10 编码列表。该列表使用与医疗保险相关的 REGARDS 数据(2016-2019 年)进行验证。数据分析时间为 2022 年 9 月 1 日至 2023 年 9 月 30 日:医疗保险理赔中检测到的卒中事件与 ARIC 和 REGARDS 研究中专家判断的卒中事件:主要结果是使用 ICD-10 编码检测卒中事件的灵敏度和特异性:在 ARIC 研究中,5194 名参与者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 80.1 [5.3]岁)在 3.0(范围为 0.003-3.0)年的中位随访中发生了 110 例经专家判定的卒中事件。大多数 ARIC 参与者为女性(3160 [60.8%]);993(19.1%)人为黑人,4180(80.5%)人为白人。使用医疗保险账单上的主要诊断代码,ICD-10 代码列表检测卒中事件的灵敏度为 81.8%(95% CI,73.3%-88.5%),特异度为 99.1%(95% CI,98.8%-99.3%)。使用医疗保险账单上的任何诊断代码,灵敏度为 94.5%(95% CI,88.5%-98.0%),特异性为 98.4%(95% CI,98.0%-98.8%)。在 REGARDS 研究中,6359 名参与者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 75.8 [7.0] 岁)中有 140 例被判定为意外脑卒中,中位随访时间为 4.0 年(范围为 0-4.0)。超过一半的 REGARDS 参与者为女性(3351 人 [52.7%]);1774 人(27.9%)为黑人,4585 人(72.1%)为白人。对于主要诊断代码,ICD-10 代码列表的灵敏度为 70.7%(95% CI,63.2%-78.3%),特异性为 99.1%(95% CI,98.9%-99.4%)。对于任何诊断代码,ICD-10 代码列表的灵敏度为 77.9%(95% CI,71.0%-84.7%),特异性为 98.9%(95% CI,98.6%-99.2%):这些研究结果表明,ICD-10 代码可用于识别医疗保险报销单中的卒中事件,具有中等灵敏度和较高特异性。
{"title":"Derivation and Validation of ICD-10 Codes for Identifying Incident Stroke.","authors":"Jesse A Columbo, Natalie Daya, Lisandro D Colantonio, Zhixin Wang, Kathryn Foti, Hyacinth I Hyacinth, Michelle C Johansen, Rebecca Gottesman, Phillip P Goodney, Virginia J Howard, Paul Muntner, Andrea L C Schneider, Elizabeth Selvin, Caitlin W Hicks","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2044","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2044","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Claims data with International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes are routinely used in clinical research. However, the use of ICD-10 codes to define incident stroke has not been validated against expert-adjudicated outcomes in the US population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To develop and validate the accuracy of an ICD-10 code list to detect incident stroke events using Medicare inpatient fee-for-service claims data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;This cohort study used data from 2 prospective population-based cohort studies, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, and included participants aged 65 years or older without prior stroke who had linked Medicare claims data. Stroke events in the ARIC and REGARDS studies were identified via active surveillance and adjudicated by expert review. Medicare-linked ARIC data (2016-2018) were used to develop a list of ICD-10 codes for incident stroke detection. The list was validated using Medicare-linked REGARDS data (2016-2019). Data were analyzed from September 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposures: &lt;/strong&gt;Stroke events detected in Medicare claims vs expert-adjudicated stroke events in the ARIC and REGARDS studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The main outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of incident stroke detection using ICD-10 codes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In the ARIC study, there were 110 adjudicated incident stroke events among 5194 participants (mean [SD] age, 80.1 [5.3] years) over a median follow-up of 3.0 (range, 0.003-3.0) years. Most ARIC participants were women (3160 [60.8%]); 993 (19.1%) were Black and 4180 (80.5%) were White. Using the primary diagnosis code on a Medicare billing claim, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 81.8% (95% CI, 73.3%-88.5%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 98.8%-99.3%) to detect incident stroke. Using any diagnosis code on a Medicare billing claim, the sensitivity was 94.5% (95% CI, 88.5%-98.0%) and the specificity was 98.4% (95% CI, 98.0%-98.8%). In the REGARDS study, there were 140 adjudicated incident strokes among 6359 participants (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.0] years) over a median follow-up of 4.0 (range, 0-4.0) years. More than half of the REGARDS participants were women (3351 [52.7%]); 1774 (27.9%) were Black and 4585 (72.1%) were White. For the primary diagnosis code, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 70.7% (95% CI, 63.2%-78.3%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 98.9%-99.4%). For any diagnosis code, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 77.9% (95% CI, 71.0%-84.7%) and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI, 98.6%-99.2%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;These findings suggest that ICD-10 codes could be used to identify incident stroke events in Medicare claims with moderate sensi","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217886/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141467952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen in Pediatric Central Nervous System Malaria: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬治疗小儿中枢神经系统疟疾:随机临床试验。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1677
Gretchen L Birbeck, Karl B Seydel, Suzanna Mwanza, Derby Tembo, Moses Chilombe, Arthur Watts, Ifunanya Ume-Ezeoke, Manoj Mathews, Archana A Patel, Musaku Mwenechanya, Paul Pensulo, Michael P McDermott

Importance: A third of children who survive malaria with neurological involvement (central nervous system [CNS] malaria) develop sequelae. A higher maximum temperature (Tmax) and seizures are risk factors for sequelae.

Objective: To compare aggressive antipyretic therapy using scheduled acetaminophen and ibuprofen vs usual care with acetaminophen alone given only for a temperature of 38.5 °C or higher.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at inpatient pediatric services of 1 tertiary care and 1 district hospital in Zambia and a tertiary care center in Malawi. Included were children aged 2 to 11 years with CNS malaria (excluding those with creatinine >1.2 mg/dL), who were enrolled from 2019 to 2022. Data analysis took place from December 2022 to April 2023.

Intervention: The aggressive antipyretic group received acetaminophen (30 mg/kg load, then 15 mg/kg) plus ibuprofen, 10 mg/kg, every 6 hours, regardless of clinical temperature for 72 hours. The usual care group received 15 mg/kg of acetaminophen as needed every 6 hours for a temperature of 38.5 °C or higher.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome variable was Tmax over 72 hours, the total duration of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included seizures and parasite clearance.

Results: Five hundred fifty-three patients were screened, 226 (40.9%) were ineligible, and 57 (10.3%) declined. A total 256 participants (n = 128/group) had a mean (SD) age of 4.3 (2.1) years; 115 (45%) were female, and 141 (55%) were male. The aggressive antipyretic group had a lower Tmax, 38.6 vs 39.2 °C (difference, -0.62 °C; 95% CI, -0.82 to -0.42; P < .001) and lower odds of experiencing multiple or prolonged seizures, 10 (8%) vs 34 children (27%) in the usual care group (odds ratio [OR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.56). No group difference in parasite clearance time was detected. Severe adverse events occurred in 40 children (15%), 25 (20%) in the usual care group and 15 (12%) in the aggressive antipyretic group, including 13 deaths (10 [8%] and 3 [2%], respectively). Increased creatinine resulted in study drug discontinuation in 8 children (6%) in the usual care group and 13 children (10%) in the aggressive antipyretic group (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.63 to 5.07).

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that aggressive antipyretic therapy reduced mean Tmax to temperature levels comparable with the Tmax among children without neurological impairments in prior observational studies and improved acute seizure outcomes with no prolongation of parasitemia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03399318.

重要性:在因神经系统受累而死于疟疾(中枢神经系统[CNS]疟疾)的儿童中,有三分之一会留下后遗症。较高的最高体温(Tmax)和癫痫发作是导致后遗症的危险因素:比较使用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬的积极退热疗法与仅在体温达到或超过 38.5 ℃时使用对乙酰氨基酚的常规疗法:这项随机临床试验在赞比亚的一家三级医院、一家地区医院和马拉维的一家三级医疗中心的儿科住院部进行。试验对象为患有中枢神经系统疟疾的2至11岁儿童(不包括肌酐大于1.2毫克/分升的儿童),入组时间为2019年至2022年。数据分析于2022年12月至2023年4月进行:积极退热组接受对乙酰氨基酚(30 毫克/千克负荷,然后 15 毫克/千克)加布洛芬(10 毫克/千克),每 6 小时一次,72 小时内无论临床体温如何。常规护理组在体温达到或超过 38.5 °C时按需每 6 小时服用 15 毫克/千克对乙酰氨基酚:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果变量是72小时内的Tmax,即随访的总时间。次要结果包括癫痫发作和寄生虫清除率:筛查了 553 名患者,其中 226 人(40.9%)不符合条件,57 人(10.3%)拒绝接受筛查。共有 256 名参与者(n = 128/组),平均(标清)年龄为 4.3 (2.1)岁;其中 115 人(45%)为女性,141 人(55%)为男性。积极退热组的 Tmax 较低,为 38.6 vs 39.2 °C(差异,-0.62 °C;95% CI,-0.82 至 -0.42;P 结论及意义:该研究发现,积极退热疗法可将平均Tmax降至与先前观察性研究中无神经系统损伤儿童的Tmax相当的温度水平,并改善急性发作的预后,同时不会延长寄生虫血症的时间:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03399318。
{"title":"Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen in Pediatric Central Nervous System Malaria: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Gretchen L Birbeck, Karl B Seydel, Suzanna Mwanza, Derby Tembo, Moses Chilombe, Arthur Watts, Ifunanya Ume-Ezeoke, Manoj Mathews, Archana A Patel, Musaku Mwenechanya, Paul Pensulo, Michael P McDermott","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1677","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1677","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>A third of children who survive malaria with neurological involvement (central nervous system [CNS] malaria) develop sequelae. A higher maximum temperature (Tmax) and seizures are risk factors for sequelae.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare aggressive antipyretic therapy using scheduled acetaminophen and ibuprofen vs usual care with acetaminophen alone given only for a temperature of 38.5 °C or higher.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted at inpatient pediatric services of 1 tertiary care and 1 district hospital in Zambia and a tertiary care center in Malawi. Included were children aged 2 to 11 years with CNS malaria (excluding those with creatinine >1.2 mg/dL), who were enrolled from 2019 to 2022. Data analysis took place from December 2022 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The aggressive antipyretic group received acetaminophen (30 mg/kg load, then 15 mg/kg) plus ibuprofen, 10 mg/kg, every 6 hours, regardless of clinical temperature for 72 hours. The usual care group received 15 mg/kg of acetaminophen as needed every 6 hours for a temperature of 38.5 °C or higher.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome variable was Tmax over 72 hours, the total duration of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included seizures and parasite clearance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred fifty-three patients were screened, 226 (40.9%) were ineligible, and 57 (10.3%) declined. A total 256 participants (n = 128/group) had a mean (SD) age of 4.3 (2.1) years; 115 (45%) were female, and 141 (55%) were male. The aggressive antipyretic group had a lower Tmax, 38.6 vs 39.2 °C (difference, -0.62 °C; 95% CI, -0.82 to -0.42; P < .001) and lower odds of experiencing multiple or prolonged seizures, 10 (8%) vs 34 children (27%) in the usual care group (odds ratio [OR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.56). No group difference in parasite clearance time was detected. Severe adverse events occurred in 40 children (15%), 25 (20%) in the usual care group and 15 (12%) in the aggressive antipyretic group, including 13 deaths (10 [8%] and 3 [2%], respectively). Increased creatinine resulted in study drug discontinuation in 8 children (6%) in the usual care group and 13 children (10%) in the aggressive antipyretic group (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.63 to 5.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that aggressive antipyretic therapy reduced mean Tmax to temperature levels comparable with the Tmax among children without neurological impairments in prior observational studies and improved acute seizure outcomes with no prolongation of parasitemia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03399318.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141296017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sleep, 24-Hour Activity Rhythms, and Subsequent Amyloid-β Pathology. 睡眠、24 小时活动节律和随后的淀粉样蛋白-β病理学。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1755
Phuong Thuy Nguyen Ho, Sanne J W Hoepel, Maria Rodriguez-Ayllon, Annemarie I Luik, Meike W Vernooij, Julia Neitzel

Importance: Sleep disturbances are common among older adults and have been associated with the development of Alzheimer disease (AD), such as amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology. For effective AD prevention, it is essential to pinpoint the specific disturbances in sleep and the underlying 24-hour activity rhythms that confer the highest risk of Aβ deposition.

Objective: To determine the associations of 24-hour activity rhythms and sleep with Aβ deposition in adults without dementia, to evaluate whether disrupted 24-hour activity and sleep may precede Aβ deposition, and to assess the role of the apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4) genotype.

Design, setting, and participants: This was an observational cohort study using data from the Rotterdam Study. Of 639 participants without dementia who underwent Aβ positron emission tomography (PET) from September 2018 to November 2021, 319 were included in the current study. Exclusion criteria were no APOE genotyping and no valid actigraphy data at the baseline visits from 2004 to 2006 or from 2012 to 2014. The mean (SD) follow-up was 7.8 (2.4) years. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to April 2024.

Exposures: Actigraphy (7 days and nights, objective sleep, and 24-hour activity rhythms), sleep diaries (self-reported sleep), Aβ42/40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181 and p-tau217 plasma assays, 18F-florbetaben PET (mean standard uptake value ratio [SUVR] in a large cortical region of interest), and APOE4 genotype.

Main outcomes and measures: Association of objective and self-reported sleep and 24-hour activity rhythms at baseline with brain Aβ PET burden at follow-up.

Results: The mean (range) age in the study population was 61.5 (48-80) years at baseline and 69.2 (60-88) years at follow-up; 150 (47%) were women. Higher intradaily variability at baseline, an indicator of fragmented 24-hour activity rhythms, was associated with higher Aβ PET burden at follow-up (β, 0.15; bootstrapped 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.26; bootstrapped P = .02, false discovery rate [FDR] P = .048). APOE genotype modified this association, which was stronger in APOE4 carriers (β, 0.38; bootstrapped 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.64; bootstrapped P = .03) compared to noncarriers (β, 0.07; bootstrapped 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.18; bootstrapped P = .19). The findings remained largely similar after excluding participants with AD pathology at baseline, suggesting that a fragmented 24-hour activity rhythm may have preceded Aβ deposition. No other objective or self-reported measure of sleep was associated with Aβ.

Conclusions and relevance: Among community-dwelling adults included in this study, higher fragmentation of the 24-hour activity rhythms was associated with greater subsequent Aβ burden, especially in APOE4 carriers. These results suggest that rest-activity fragmentation could represent a modifiable risk factor for AD.

重要性:睡眠障碍在老年人中很常见,并与阿尔茨海默病(AD)的发展有关,如淀粉样蛋白-β(Aβ)病理学。要想有效预防阿尔茨海默病,就必须确定哪些特定的睡眠障碍和基本的 24 小时活动节律会带来最高的 Aβ 沉积风险:目的:确定无痴呆症成年人的 24 小时活动节律和睡眠与 Aβ 沉积的关系,评估 24 小时活动和睡眠紊乱是否可能先于 Aβ 沉积,并评估载脂蛋白 E ε4 (APOE4) 基因型的作用:这是一项观察性队列研究,使用的数据来自鹿特丹研究。在2018年9月至2021年11月期间接受Aβ正电子发射断层扫描(PET)检查的639名无痴呆症的参与者中,有319人纳入了本次研究。排除标准为未进行APOE基因分型,以及在2004年至2006年或2012年至2014年的基线访问中未获得有效的动图数据。平均(标清)随访时间为 7.8 (2.4) 年。数据分析时间为 2023 年 3 月至 2024 年 4 月:主要结果和测量指标:客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性、客观睡眠和自我报告睡眠的相关性:主要结果和测量指标:基线时客观和自我报告的睡眠和 24 小时活动节律与随访时脑 Aβ PET 负担的关系:研究对象的平均年龄(范围)为基线61.5(48-80)岁,随访69.2(60-88)岁;150人(47%)为女性。基线时较高的日内变异性(24 小时活动节律分散的指标)与随访时较高的 Aβ PET 负担相关(β,0.15;自引导 95% CI,0.04 至 0.26;自引导 P = .02,假发现率 [FDR] P = .048)。APOE 基因型改变了这种关联,与非携带者相比,APOE4 携带者的关联性更强(β,0.38;自引导 95% CI,0.05 至 0.64;自引导 P = .03)(β,0.07;自引导 95% CI,-0.04 至 0.18;自引导 P = .19)。在排除基线患有注意力缺失症的参与者后,研究结果仍基本相似,这表明在Aβ沉积之前,24小时的活动节奏可能是零散的。没有其他客观或自我报告的睡眠指标与Aβ相关:在这项研究中,24 小时活动节律的碎片化程度越高,随后的 Aβ 负担就越大,尤其是在 APOE4 携带者中。这些结果表明,静息-活动片段化可能是导致注意力缺失症的一个可改变的风险因素。
{"title":"Sleep, 24-Hour Activity Rhythms, and Subsequent Amyloid-β Pathology.","authors":"Phuong Thuy Nguyen Ho, Sanne J W Hoepel, Maria Rodriguez-Ayllon, Annemarie I Luik, Meike W Vernooij, Julia Neitzel","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1755","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1755","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sleep disturbances are common among older adults and have been associated with the development of Alzheimer disease (AD), such as amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology. For effective AD prevention, it is essential to pinpoint the specific disturbances in sleep and the underlying 24-hour activity rhythms that confer the highest risk of Aβ deposition.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the associations of 24-hour activity rhythms and sleep with Aβ deposition in adults without dementia, to evaluate whether disrupted 24-hour activity and sleep may precede Aβ deposition, and to assess the role of the apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4) genotype.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was an observational cohort study using data from the Rotterdam Study. Of 639 participants without dementia who underwent Aβ positron emission tomography (PET) from September 2018 to November 2021, 319 were included in the current study. Exclusion criteria were no APOE genotyping and no valid actigraphy data at the baseline visits from 2004 to 2006 or from 2012 to 2014. The mean (SD) follow-up was 7.8 (2.4) years. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to April 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Actigraphy (7 days and nights, objective sleep, and 24-hour activity rhythms), sleep diaries (self-reported sleep), Aβ42/40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181 and p-tau217 plasma assays, 18F-florbetaben PET (mean standard uptake value ratio [SUVR] in a large cortical region of interest), and APOE4 genotype.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Association of objective and self-reported sleep and 24-hour activity rhythms at baseline with brain Aβ PET burden at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (range) age in the study population was 61.5 (48-80) years at baseline and 69.2 (60-88) years at follow-up; 150 (47%) were women. Higher intradaily variability at baseline, an indicator of fragmented 24-hour activity rhythms, was associated with higher Aβ PET burden at follow-up (β, 0.15; bootstrapped 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.26; bootstrapped P = .02, false discovery rate [FDR] P = .048). APOE genotype modified this association, which was stronger in APOE4 carriers (β, 0.38; bootstrapped 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.64; bootstrapped P = .03) compared to noncarriers (β, 0.07; bootstrapped 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.18; bootstrapped P = .19). The findings remained largely similar after excluding participants with AD pathology at baseline, suggesting that a fragmented 24-hour activity rhythm may have preceded Aβ deposition. No other objective or self-reported measure of sleep was associated with Aβ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Among community-dwelling adults included in this study, higher fragmentation of the 24-hour activity rhythms was associated with greater subsequent Aβ burden, especially in APOE4 carriers. These results suggest that rest-activity fragmentation could represent a modifiable risk factor for AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197458/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA neurology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1