首页 > 最新文献

JAMA neurology最新文献

英文 中文
Lecanemab and Vascular-Amyloid Deposition in Brains of People With Down Syndrome. 乐卡单抗与唐氏综合征患者大脑中的血管淀粉样蛋白沉积。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2579
Lei Liu, Adriana Saba, Jesse R Pascual, Michael B Miller, Elizabeth L Hennessey, Ira T Lott, Adam M Brickman, Donna M Wilcock, Jordan P Harp, Frederick A Schmitt, Dennis J Selkoe, Jasmeer P Chhatwal, Elizabeth Head

Importance: Anti-β-amyloid immunotherapy using lecanemab is becoming increasingly available to patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) develop AD neuropathology by age 40 years, representing a significant cohort of genetically determined AD.

Objective: To investigate the binding properties of lecanemab in the brains of people with DS, in anticipation of their inclusion in clinical trials or access to antiamyloid immunotherapies.

Design, setting, participants: The study included cases of postmortem brain tissue analysis from 15 individuals with DS aged 43 to 68 years that were acquired from Alzheimer Disease research centers at the University of California, Irvine and the University of Kentucky from 2008 to 2021. Data were analyzed from August 2023 through May 2024.

Exposure: The binding properties of lecanemab were assessed in brain tissue.

Main outcome: The primary outcome was the extent of lecanemab binding to amyloid plaques and brain blood vessels.

Results: Tissue from 15 people (8 were female [53%]) with DS ranging in age from 43 to 68 (mean, 56.6) years were included in the study. Lecanemab-labeled amyloid plaques appeared in all 15 DS cases studied, indicating potential target engagement. However, extensive binding of lecanemab to brain blood vessels in DS was observed, raising significant safety concerns. These findings underscore the necessity for clinical trials of lecanemab in people with DS to evaluate both safety and efficacy, particularly in individuals older than 43 years.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest significant binding of lecanemab to cerebral amyloid angiopathy in DS. Lecanemab should be rigorously tested in clinical trials for AD in the DS population to determine its safety and efficacy, especially in those older than 43 years.

重要性:越来越多的阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者可以使用利卡尼单抗(lecanemab)进行抗β淀粉样蛋白免疫治疗。唐氏综合征(DS)患者在40岁之前就会出现阿尔茨海默病神经病理学症状,是由基因决定的阿尔茨海默病的重要群体:调查莱卡奈单抗在唐氏综合征患者大脑中的结合特性,以便将他们纳入临床试验或获得抗淀粉样蛋白免疫疗法:研究包括对15名年龄在43至68岁之间的DS患者的死后脑组织进行分析,这些病例于2008年至2021年期间从加利福尼亚大学欧文分校和肯塔基大学的阿尔茨海默病研究中心获得。数据分析时间为2023年8月至2024年5月。暴露:评估利卡单抗在脑组织中的结合特性:主要结果:主要结果是lecanemab与淀粉样蛋白斑块和脑血管的结合程度:研究共纳入了 15 名年龄在 43 岁至 68 岁(平均 56.6 岁)的 DS 患者(8 名女性 [53%])的组织。在研究的所有 15 例 DS 患者中都出现了来卡尼单抗标记的淀粉样蛋白斑块,这表明可能存在靶点参与。然而,在 DS 中观察到莱卡尼单抗与脑血管广泛结合,这引起了人们对安全性的极大关注。这些发现强调了在DS患者中进行莱卡奈单抗临床试验以评估其安全性和有效性的必要性,尤其是在43岁以上的患者中:这些研究结果表明,来卡尼单抗与DS患者的脑淀粉样血管病有明显的结合。应在针对DS人群的AD临床试验中对莱卡尼单抗进行严格测试,以确定其安全性和有效性,尤其是在43岁以上的人群中。
{"title":"Lecanemab and Vascular-Amyloid Deposition in Brains of People With Down Syndrome.","authors":"Lei Liu, Adriana Saba, Jesse R Pascual, Michael B Miller, Elizabeth L Hennessey, Ira T Lott, Adam M Brickman, Donna M Wilcock, Jordan P Harp, Frederick A Schmitt, Dennis J Selkoe, Jasmeer P Chhatwal, Elizabeth Head","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2579","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2579","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Anti-β-amyloid immunotherapy using lecanemab is becoming increasingly available to patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) develop AD neuropathology by age 40 years, representing a significant cohort of genetically determined AD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the binding properties of lecanemab in the brains of people with DS, in anticipation of their inclusion in clinical trials or access to antiamyloid immunotherapies.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, participants: </strong>The study included cases of postmortem brain tissue analysis from 15 individuals with DS aged 43 to 68 years that were acquired from Alzheimer Disease research centers at the University of California, Irvine and the University of Kentucky from 2008 to 2021. Data were analyzed from August 2023 through May 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The binding properties of lecanemab were assessed in brain tissue.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>The primary outcome was the extent of lecanemab binding to amyloid plaques and brain blood vessels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tissue from 15 people (8 were female [53%]) with DS ranging in age from 43 to 68 (mean, 56.6) years were included in the study. Lecanemab-labeled amyloid plaques appeared in all 15 DS cases studied, indicating potential target engagement. However, extensive binding of lecanemab to brain blood vessels in DS was observed, raising significant safety concerns. These findings underscore the necessity for clinical trials of lecanemab in people with DS to evaluate both safety and efficacy, particularly in individuals older than 43 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These findings suggest significant binding of lecanemab to cerebral amyloid angiopathy in DS. Lecanemab should be rigorously tested in clinical trials for AD in the DS population to determine its safety and efficacy, especially in those older than 43 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334015/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141999925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Role of the X Chromosome in Alzheimer Disease Genetics. X 染色体在阿尔茨海默病遗传学中的作用。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2843
Michael E Belloy, Yann Le Guen, Ilaria Stewart, Kennedy Williams, Joachim Herz, Richard Sherva, Rui Zhang, Victoria Merritt, Matthew S Panizzon, Richard L Hauger, J Michael Gaziano, Mark Logue, Valerio Napolioni, Michael D Greicius

Importance: The X chromosome has remained enigmatic in Alzheimer disease (AD), yet it makes up 5% of the genome and carries a high proportion of genes expressed in the brain, making it particularly appealing as a potential source of unexplored genetic variation in AD.

Objectives: To perform the first large-scale X chromosome-wide association study (XWAS) of AD.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a meta-analysis of genetic association studies in case-control, family-based, population-based, and longitudinal AD-related cohorts from the US Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium, the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project, the UK Biobank, the Finnish health registry, and the US Million Veterans Program. Risk of AD was evaluated through case-control logistic regression analyses. Data were analyzed between January 2023 and March 2024. Genetic data available from high-density single-nucleotide variant microarrays and whole-genome sequencing and summary statistics for multitissue expression and protein quantitative trait loci available from published studies were included, enabling follow-up genetic colocalization analyses. A total of 1 629 863 eligible participants were selected from referred and volunteer samples, 477 596 of whom were excluded for analysis exclusion criteria. The number of participants who declined to participate in original studies was not available.

Main outcome and measures: Risk of AD, reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Associations were considered at X chromosome-wide (P < 1 × 10-5) and genome-wide (P < 5 × 10-8) significance. Primary analyses are nonstratified, while secondary analyses evaluate sex-stratified effects.

Results: Analyses included 1 152 284 participants of non-Hispanic White, European ancestry (664 403 [57.7%] female and 487 881 [42.3%] male), including 138 558 individuals with AD. Six independent genetic loci passed X chromosome-wide significance, with 4 showing support for links between the genetic signal for AD and expression of nearby genes in brain and nonbrain tissues. One of these 4 loci passed conservative genome-wide significance, with its lead variant centered on an intron of SLC9A7 (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04) and colocalization analyses prioritizing both the SLC9A7 and nearby CHST7 genes. Of these 6 loci, 4 displayed evidence for escape from X chromosome inactivation with regard to AD risk.

Conclusion and relevance: This large-scale XWAS of AD identified the novel SLC9A7 locus. SLC9A7 regulates pH homeostasis in Golgi secretory compartments and is anticipated to have downstream effects on amyloid β accumulation. Overall, this study advances our knowledge of AD genetics and may provide novel biological drug targets. The results further provide initial insights into elucidating the role of the X chromosome in sex-based differences in AD.

重要性:在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中,X 染色体一直是个谜,但它占基因组的 5%,并携带着在大脑中表达的很高比例的基因,这使它成为阿尔茨海默病中未探索的遗传变异的潜在来源,因而特别具有吸引力:进行首次大规模的X染色体全基因组AD关联研究(XWAS):这是一项对病例对照、家族、人群和纵向AD相关队列中遗传关联研究的荟萃分析,这些队列来自美国阿尔茨海默病遗传学联合会、阿尔茨海默病测序项目、英国生物库、芬兰健康登记处和美国百万退伍军人计划。通过病例对照逻辑回归分析评估阿尔茨海默病风险。数据分析时间为 2023 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月。从高密度单核苷酸变异微阵列和全基因组测序中获得的遗传数据,以及从已发表研究中获得的多组织表达和蛋白质定量性状位点的汇总统计数据都被纳入其中,以便进行后续的遗传共定位分析。从转介样本和志愿者样本中共筛选出 1 629 863 名符合条件的参与者,其中 477 596 人因分析排除标准而被排除。拒绝参与原始研究的参与者人数不详:AD风险,以几率比(ORs)和95% CIs的形式报告。在 X 染色体范围内考虑相关性(P 结果):分析包括 1 152 284 名非西班牙裔白人、欧洲血统的参与者(664 403 名女性[57.7%]和 487 881 名男性[42.3%]),其中包括 138 558 名 AD 患者。有 6 个独立的基因位点通过了 X 染色体范围内的显著性鉴定,其中 4 个位点显示出 AD 基因信号与附近基因在大脑和非大脑组织中的表达之间的联系。在这 4 个基因位点中,有一个位点通过了保守的全基因组显著性分析,其主导变异位于 SLC9A7 的一个内含子上(OR,1.03;95% CI,1.02-1.04),共定位分析优先考虑 SLC9A7 和附近的 CHST7 基因。在这 6 个基因位点中,有 4 个基因位点显示了摆脱 X 染色体失活的证据,这与 AD 风险有关:这项大规模的 AD XWAS 发现了新的 SLC9A7 基因位点。SLC9A7调节高尔基体分泌区的pH平衡,预计会对淀粉样β的积累产生下游影响。总之,这项研究增进了我们对AD遗传学的了解,并可能提供新的生物药物靶点。研究结果进一步为阐明X染色体在AD性别差异中的作用提供了初步见解。
{"title":"Role of the X Chromosome in Alzheimer Disease Genetics.","authors":"Michael E Belloy, Yann Le Guen, Ilaria Stewart, Kennedy Williams, Joachim Herz, Richard Sherva, Rui Zhang, Victoria Merritt, Matthew S Panizzon, Richard L Hauger, J Michael Gaziano, Mark Logue, Valerio Napolioni, Michael D Greicius","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2843","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2843","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The X chromosome has remained enigmatic in Alzheimer disease (AD), yet it makes up 5% of the genome and carries a high proportion of genes expressed in the brain, making it particularly appealing as a potential source of unexplored genetic variation in AD.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To perform the first large-scale X chromosome-wide association study (XWAS) of AD.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a meta-analysis of genetic association studies in case-control, family-based, population-based, and longitudinal AD-related cohorts from the US Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium, the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project, the UK Biobank, the Finnish health registry, and the US Million Veterans Program. Risk of AD was evaluated through case-control logistic regression analyses. Data were analyzed between January 2023 and March 2024. Genetic data available from high-density single-nucleotide variant microarrays and whole-genome sequencing and summary statistics for multitissue expression and protein quantitative trait loci available from published studies were included, enabling follow-up genetic colocalization analyses. A total of 1 629 863 eligible participants were selected from referred and volunteer samples, 477 596 of whom were excluded for analysis exclusion criteria. The number of participants who declined to participate in original studies was not available.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Risk of AD, reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Associations were considered at X chromosome-wide (P < 1 × 10-5) and genome-wide (P < 5 × 10-8) significance. Primary analyses are nonstratified, while secondary analyses evaluate sex-stratified effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses included 1 152 284 participants of non-Hispanic White, European ancestry (664 403 [57.7%] female and 487 881 [42.3%] male), including 138 558 individuals with AD. Six independent genetic loci passed X chromosome-wide significance, with 4 showing support for links between the genetic signal for AD and expression of nearby genes in brain and nonbrain tissues. One of these 4 loci passed conservative genome-wide significance, with its lead variant centered on an intron of SLC9A7 (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04) and colocalization analyses prioritizing both the SLC9A7 and nearby CHST7 genes. Of these 6 loci, 4 displayed evidence for escape from X chromosome inactivation with regard to AD risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>This large-scale XWAS of AD identified the novel SLC9A7 locus. SLC9A7 regulates pH homeostasis in Golgi secretory compartments and is anticipated to have downstream effects on amyloid β accumulation. Overall, this study advances our knowledge of AD genetics and may provide novel biological drug targets. The results further provide initial insights into elucidating the role of the X chromosome in sex-based differences in AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385320/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142154091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lesioning the Brain-From Serendipity to Science. 脑损伤--从偶然到科学。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2221
Leo P Sugrue, Samuel Lashof-Regas, Doris D Wang
{"title":"Lesioning the Brain-From Serendipity to Science.","authors":"Leo P Sugrue, Samuel Lashof-Regas, Doris D Wang","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2221","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2221","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141748174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Error in Figure. 图中错误。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3566
{"title":"Error in Figure.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3566","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3566","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474408/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142465720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sex Differences in Case-Fatality Rates of Stroke. 中风病死率的性别差异。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2596
Faizan Khan, Michael D Hill
{"title":"Sex Differences in Case-Fatality Rates of Stroke.","authors":"Faizan Khan, Michael D Hill","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2596","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2596","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141999927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expanding the Prion Paradigm to Include Alzheimer and Parkinson Diseases. 扩展朊病毒范式,将阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病纳入其中。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2464
Carlo Condello, David Westaway, Stanley B Prusiner
{"title":"Expanding the Prion Paradigm to Include Alzheimer and Parkinson Diseases.","authors":"Carlo Condello, David Westaway, Stanley B Prusiner","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2464","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2464","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141999923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Blood-Based Biomarkers for Alzheimer Disease-Ready for Primary Care? 基于血液的阿尔茨海默病生物标志物--是否已准备好用于初级保健?
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2801
Lawren VandeVrede, Gil D Rabinovici
{"title":"Blood-Based Biomarkers for Alzheimer Disease-Ready for Primary Care?","authors":"Lawren VandeVrede, Gil D Rabinovici","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2801","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2801","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141788031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endovascular vs Medical Management of Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. 急性基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗与药物治疗:随机临床试验的二次分析。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2652
Rui Li, Chunrong Tao, Jun Sun, Chao Zhang, Pengfei Xu, Yamei Yin, Hongxing Han, Guangxiong Yuan, Tao Cui, Peiyang Zhou, Wenhuo Chen, Guoyong Zeng, Yuwen Li, Zhengfei Ma, Chuanqing Yu, Junfeng Su, Zhiming Zhou, Zhongjun Chen, Li Wang, Cong Luo, Xiaozhong Jing, Anmo Wang, Nan Shen, Mohamad Abdalkader, Thanh N Nguyen, Adnan I Qureshi, Jeffrey L Saver, Raul G Nogueira, Wei Hu

Importance: In several randomized clinical trials, endovascular thrombectomy led to better functional outcomes than conventional treatment at 90 days poststroke in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion. However, the long-term clinical outcomes of these patients have not been well delineated.

Objective: To evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion following endovascular thrombectomy vs control.

Design, setting, and participants: This study is an extension of the ATTENTION trial, a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients were included between February 2021 and January 2022, with 1-year follow-up through April 2023. This multicenter, population-based study was conducted at 36 comprehensive stroke sites. Patients with acute basilar artery occlusion within 12 hours of estimated symptom onset were included. Of the 342 patients randomized in the ATTENTION trial, 330 (96.5%) had 1-year follow-up information available.

Exposures: Endovascular thrombectomy (thrombectomy group) vs best medical treatment (control group).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was defined as a score of 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were functional independence (mRS score 0-2), excellent outcome (mRS score 0-1), level of disability (distribution of all 7 mRS scores), mortality, and health-related quality of life at 1 year.

Results: Among 330 patients who had 1-year follow-up data, 227 (68.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 67.0 (10.7) years. An mRS score 0 to 3 at 1 year was achieved by 99 of 222 patients (44.6%) in the thrombectomy group and 21 of 108 (19.4%) in the control group (adjusted rate ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.51-3.29). Mortality at 1 year compared with 90 days was more frequent in both the thrombectomy group (101 of 222 [45.5%] vs 83 of 226 [36.7%]) and the control group (69 of 108 [63.9%] vs 63 of 114 [55.3%]). Excellent outcome (mRS score 0-1) at 1 year compared with 90 days increased in the thrombectomy group (62 of 222 [27.9%] vs 45 of 226 [19.9%]) but not in the control group (9 of 108 [8.3%] vs 9 of 114 [7.9%]) resulting in a magnified treatment benefit.

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with basilar artery occlusion within 12 hours of onset, the benefits of endovascular thrombectomy at 1 year compared with 90 days were sustained for favorable (mRS score 0-3) outcome and enhanced for excellent (mRS score 0-1) outcome.

重要性:在几项随机临床试验中,急性基底动脉闭塞患者在卒中后90天进行血管内血栓切除术的功能预后优于常规治疗。然而,这些患者的长期临床疗效尚未得到很好的描述:评估急性基底动脉闭塞患者接受血管内血栓切除术与对照组治疗后的 1 年临床疗效:本研究是多中心随机临床试验 ATTENTION 试验的延伸。患者纳入时间为 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 1 月,随访 1 年至 2023 年 4 月。这项以人群为基础的多中心研究在 36 个综合卒中站点进行。研究纳入了估计症状出现后 12 小时内发生急性基底动脉闭塞的患者。在 ATTENTION 试验中随机抽取的 342 名患者中,330 人(96.5%)有 1 年的随访资料:暴露:血管内血栓切除术(血栓切除术组)与最佳药物治疗(对照组):主要结果和测量指标:主要结果定义为1年后改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为0至3分。次要结果为1年后的功能独立性(mRS评分0-2分)、优秀结果(mRS评分0-1分)、残疾程度(所有7项mRS评分的分布)、死亡率和健康相关生活质量:在 330 名有 1 年随访数据的患者中,227 名(68.8%)为男性,平均(标清)年龄为 67.0(10.7)岁。血栓切除术组 222 例患者中有 99 例(44.6%)在 1 年后 mRS 评分达到 0 至 3 分,对照组 108 例患者中有 21 例(19.4%)在 1 年后 mRS 评分达到 0 至 3 分(调整后比率比为 2.23;95% CI,1.51-3.29)。血栓切除术组(222 例中的 101 例[45.5%] vs 226 例中的 83 例[36.7%])和对照组(108 例中的 69 例[63.9%] vs 114 例中的 63 例[55.3%])1 年后的死亡率均高于 90 天后的死亡率。血栓切除术组(222 例中的 62 例 [27.9%] vs 226 例中的 45 例 [19.9%])与对照组(108 例中的 9 例 [8.3%] vs 114 例中的 9 例 [7.9%])相比,1 年后的优良预后(mRS 评分 0-1 分)在 90 天内有所增加,从而扩大了治疗效果:在发病 12 小时内的基底动脉闭塞患者中,与 90 天相比,血管内血栓切除术在 1 年后对良好(mRS 评分 0-3 分)预后的益处是持续的,对优秀(mRS 评分 0-1 分)预后的益处是增强的。
{"title":"Endovascular vs Medical Management of Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Rui Li, Chunrong Tao, Jun Sun, Chao Zhang, Pengfei Xu, Yamei Yin, Hongxing Han, Guangxiong Yuan, Tao Cui, Peiyang Zhou, Wenhuo Chen, Guoyong Zeng, Yuwen Li, Zhengfei Ma, Chuanqing Yu, Junfeng Su, Zhiming Zhou, Zhongjun Chen, Li Wang, Cong Luo, Xiaozhong Jing, Anmo Wang, Nan Shen, Mohamad Abdalkader, Thanh N Nguyen, Adnan I Qureshi, Jeffrey L Saver, Raul G Nogueira, Wei Hu","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2652","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>In several randomized clinical trials, endovascular thrombectomy led to better functional outcomes than conventional treatment at 90 days poststroke in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion. However, the long-term clinical outcomes of these patients have not been well delineated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion following endovascular thrombectomy vs control.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This study is an extension of the ATTENTION trial, a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients were included between February 2021 and January 2022, with 1-year follow-up through April 2023. This multicenter, population-based study was conducted at 36 comprehensive stroke sites. Patients with acute basilar artery occlusion within 12 hours of estimated symptom onset were included. Of the 342 patients randomized in the ATTENTION trial, 330 (96.5%) had 1-year follow-up information available.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Endovascular thrombectomy (thrombectomy group) vs best medical treatment (control group).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was defined as a score of 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were functional independence (mRS score 0-2), excellent outcome (mRS score 0-1), level of disability (distribution of all 7 mRS scores), mortality, and health-related quality of life at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 330 patients who had 1-year follow-up data, 227 (68.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 67.0 (10.7) years. An mRS score 0 to 3 at 1 year was achieved by 99 of 222 patients (44.6%) in the thrombectomy group and 21 of 108 (19.4%) in the control group (adjusted rate ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.51-3.29). Mortality at 1 year compared with 90 days was more frequent in both the thrombectomy group (101 of 222 [45.5%] vs 83 of 226 [36.7%]) and the control group (69 of 108 [63.9%] vs 63 of 114 [55.3%]). Excellent outcome (mRS score 0-1) at 1 year compared with 90 days increased in the thrombectomy group (62 of 222 [27.9%] vs 45 of 226 [19.9%]) but not in the control group (9 of 108 [8.3%] vs 9 of 114 [7.9%]) resulting in a magnified treatment benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Among patients with basilar artery occlusion within 12 hours of onset, the benefits of endovascular thrombectomy at 1 year compared with 90 days were sustained for favorable (mRS score 0-3) outcome and enhanced for excellent (mRS score 0-1) outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348088/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MRI Signature of α-Synuclein Pathology in Asymptomatic Stages and a Memory Clinic Population. 无症状阶段和记忆门诊人群中α-突触核蛋白病理学的磁共振成像特征。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2713
Laura E M Wisse, Nicola Spotorno, Marcello Rossi, Michel J Grothe, Angela Mammana, Pontus Tideman, Simone Baiardi, Olof Strandberg, Alice Ticca, Danielle van Westen, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren, Sebastian Palmqvist, Erik Stomrud, Piero Parchi, Oskar Hansson
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The lack of an in vivo measure for α-synuclein (α-syn) pathology until recently has limited thorough characterization of its brain atrophy pattern, especially during early disease stages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association of state-of-the-art cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) seed amplification assays (SAA) α-syn positivity (SAA α-syn+) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) structural measures, across the continuum from clinically unimpaired (CU) to cognitively impaired (CI) individuals, in 3 independent cohorts, and separately in CU and CI individuals, the latter reflecting a memory clinic population.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Cross-sectional data were used from the Swedish BioFINDER-2 study (inclusion, 2017-2023) as the discovery cohort and the Swedish BioFINDER-1 study (inclusion, 2007-2015) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; inclusion 2005-2022) as replication cohorts. All cohorts are from multicenter studies, but the BioFINDER cohorts used 1 MRI scanner. CU and CI individuals fulfilling inclusion criteria and without missing data points in relevant metrics were included in the study. All analyses were performed from 2023 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Presence of α-syn pathology, estimated by baseline CSF SAA α-syn.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were cross-sectional structural MRI measures either through voxel-based morphometry (VBM) or regions of interest (ROI) including an automated pipeline for cholinergic basal forebrain nuclei CH4/4p (nucleus basalis of Meynert [NBM]) and CH1/2/3. Secondary outcomes were domain-specific cross-sectional cognitive measures. Analyses were adjusted for CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2961 participants were included in this study: 1388 (mean [SD] age, 71 [10] years; 702 female [51%]) from the BioFINDER-2 study, 752 (mean [SD] age, 72 [6] years; 406 female [54%]) from the BioFINDER-1 study, and 821 (mean [SD] age, 75 [8] years; 449 male [55%]) from ADNI. In the BioFINDER-2 study, VBM analyses in the whole cohort revealed a specific association between SAA α-syn+ and the cholinergic NBM, even when adjusting for Alzheimer copathology. ROI-based analyses in the BioFINDER-2 study focused on regions involved in the cholinergic system and confirmed that SAA α-syn+ was indeed independently associated with smaller NBM (β = -0.271; 95% CI, -0.399 to -0.142; P <.001) and CH1/2/3 volumes (β = -0.227; 95% CI, -0.377 to -0.076; P =.02). SAA α-syn+ was also independently associated with smaller NBM volumes in the separate CU (β = -0.360; 95% CI, -0.603 to -0.117; P =.03) and CI (β = -0.251; 95% CI, -0.408 to -0.095; P =.02) groups. Overall, the association between SAA α-syn+ and NBM volume was replicated in the BioFINDER-1 study and ADNI cohort. In CI individuals, NBM volumes partially mediated the association of SAA α-sy
重要性:直到最近,由于缺乏α-突触核蛋白(α-syn)病理学的体内测量方法,限制了对其脑萎缩模式的全面描述,尤其是在疾病的早期阶段:目的:在 3 个独立队列中,评估从临床未受损(CU)到认知受损(CI)患者的脑脊液(CSF)种子扩增检测(SAA)α-syn 阳性(SAA α-syn+)与磁共振成像(MRI)结构测量的相关性,并分别评估 CU 和 CI 患者,后者反映了记忆门诊人群:横断面数据来自作为发现队列的瑞典 BioFINDER-2 研究(纳入时间:2017-2023 年),以及作为复制队列的瑞典 BioFINDER-1 研究(纳入时间:2007-2015 年)和阿尔茨海默病神经影像倡议(ADNI;纳入时间:2005-2022 年)。所有队列均来自多中心研究,但 BioFINDER 队列使用的是一台磁共振成像扫描仪。研究纳入了符合纳入标准且相关指标无数据点缺失的 CU 和 CI 患者。所有分析均在 2023 年至 2024 年期间进行:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果是通过体素形态测量(VBM)或感兴趣区(ROI)(包括胆碱能基底前脑核CH4/4p(Nucleus basalis of Meynert [NBM])和CH1/2/3的自动流水线)进行横断面结构MRI测量。次要结果是特定领域的横断面认知测量。分析结果根据阿尔茨海默病病理的 CSF 生物标志物进行了调整:本研究共纳入 2961 名参与者:结果:本研究共纳入 2961 名参与者:1388 名(平均 [SD] 年龄,71 [10] 岁;702 名女性 [51%])来自 BioFINDER-2 研究,752 名(平均 [SD] 年龄,72 [6] 岁;406 名女性 [54%])来自 BioFINDER-1 研究,821 名(平均 [SD] 年龄,75 [8] 岁;449 名男性 [55%])来自 ADNI。在 BioFINDER-2 研究中,对整个队列进行的 VBM 分析显示,SAA α-syn+ 与胆碱能 NBM 之间存在特定的关联,即使在调整阿尔茨海默病共同病理学的情况下也是如此。BioFINDER-2 研究中基于 ROI 的分析侧重于胆碱能系统相关区域,结果证实 SAA α-syn+ 确实与较小的 NBM 独立相关(β = -0.271; 95% CI, -0.399 to -0.142; P 结论及意义:在这项队列研究中,SAA α-syn+ 始终与无症状阶段的 NBM 萎缩相关。此外,在记忆诊所的 CI 群体中,SAA α-syn+ 与 NBM 萎缩有关,而 NBM 萎缩部分介导了 α-syn 诱导的注意力/执行功能障碍。
{"title":"MRI Signature of α-Synuclein Pathology in Asymptomatic Stages and a Memory Clinic Population.","authors":"Laura E M Wisse, Nicola Spotorno, Marcello Rossi, Michel J Grothe, Angela Mammana, Pontus Tideman, Simone Baiardi, Olof Strandberg, Alice Ticca, Danielle van Westen, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren, Sebastian Palmqvist, Erik Stomrud, Piero Parchi, Oskar Hansson","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2713","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2713","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;The lack of an in vivo measure for α-synuclein (α-syn) pathology until recently has limited thorough characterization of its brain atrophy pattern, especially during early disease stages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the association of state-of-the-art cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) seed amplification assays (SAA) α-syn positivity (SAA α-syn+) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) structural measures, across the continuum from clinically unimpaired (CU) to cognitively impaired (CI) individuals, in 3 independent cohorts, and separately in CU and CI individuals, the latter reflecting a memory clinic population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;Cross-sectional data were used from the Swedish BioFINDER-2 study (inclusion, 2017-2023) as the discovery cohort and the Swedish BioFINDER-1 study (inclusion, 2007-2015) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; inclusion 2005-2022) as replication cohorts. All cohorts are from multicenter studies, but the BioFINDER cohorts used 1 MRI scanner. CU and CI individuals fulfilling inclusion criteria and without missing data points in relevant metrics were included in the study. All analyses were performed from 2023 to 2024.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposures: &lt;/strong&gt;Presence of α-syn pathology, estimated by baseline CSF SAA α-syn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary outcomes were cross-sectional structural MRI measures either through voxel-based morphometry (VBM) or regions of interest (ROI) including an automated pipeline for cholinergic basal forebrain nuclei CH4/4p (nucleus basalis of Meynert [NBM]) and CH1/2/3. Secondary outcomes were domain-specific cross-sectional cognitive measures. Analyses were adjusted for CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer pathology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 2961 participants were included in this study: 1388 (mean [SD] age, 71 [10] years; 702 female [51%]) from the BioFINDER-2 study, 752 (mean [SD] age, 72 [6] years; 406 female [54%]) from the BioFINDER-1 study, and 821 (mean [SD] age, 75 [8] years; 449 male [55%]) from ADNI. In the BioFINDER-2 study, VBM analyses in the whole cohort revealed a specific association between SAA α-syn+ and the cholinergic NBM, even when adjusting for Alzheimer copathology. ROI-based analyses in the BioFINDER-2 study focused on regions involved in the cholinergic system and confirmed that SAA α-syn+ was indeed independently associated with smaller NBM (β = -0.271; 95% CI, -0.399 to -0.142; P &lt;.001) and CH1/2/3 volumes (β = -0.227; 95% CI, -0.377 to -0.076; P =.02). SAA α-syn+ was also independently associated with smaller NBM volumes in the separate CU (β = -0.360; 95% CI, -0.603 to -0.117; P =.03) and CI (β = -0.251; 95% CI, -0.408 to -0.095; P =.02) groups. Overall, the association between SAA α-syn+ and NBM volume was replicated in the BioFINDER-1 study and ADNI cohort. In CI individuals, NBM volumes partially mediated the association of SAA α-sy","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11284633/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141788034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
JAMA Neurology Editorial Fellowship-Call for Applicants. JAMA Neurology 编辑奖学金--征集申请人。
IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2554
S Andrew Josephson
{"title":"JAMA Neurology Editorial Fellowship-Call for Applicants.","authors":"S Andrew Josephson","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2554","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2554","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141999924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA neurology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1