JAMA neurology最新文献

Importance: In several randomized clinical trials, endovascular thrombectomy led to better functional outcomes than conventional treatment at 90 days poststroke in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion. However, the long-term clinical outcomes of these patients have not been well delineated.

Objective: To evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion following endovascular thrombectomy vs control.

Design, setting, and participants: This study is an extension of the ATTENTION trial, a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients were included between February 2021 and January 2022, with 1-year follow-up through April 2023. This multicenter, population-based study was conducted at 36 comprehensive stroke sites. Patients with acute basilar artery occlusion within 12 hours of estimated symptom onset were included. Of the 342 patients randomized in the ATTENTION trial, 330 (96.5%) had 1-year follow-up information available.

Exposures: Endovascular thrombectomy (thrombectomy group) vs best medical treatment (control group).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was defined as a score of 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were functional independence (mRS score 0-2), excellent outcome (mRS score 0-1), level of disability (distribution of all 7 mRS scores), mortality, and health-related quality of life at 1 year.

Results: Among 330 patients who had 1-year follow-up data, 227 (68.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 67.0 (10.7) years. An mRS score 0 to 3 at 1 year was achieved by 99 of 222 patients (44.6%) in the thrombectomy group and 21 of 108 (19.4%) in the control group (adjusted rate ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.51-3.29). Mortality at 1 year compared with 90 days was more frequent in both the thrombectomy group (101 of 222 [45.5%] vs 83 of 226 [36.7%]) and the control group (69 of 108 [63.9%] vs 63 of 114 [55.3%]). Excellent outcome (mRS score 0-1) at 1 year compared with 90 days increased in the thrombectomy group (62 of 222 [27.9%] vs 45 of 226 [19.9%]) but not in the control group (9 of 108 [8.3%] vs 9 of 114 [7.9%]) resulting in a magnified treatment benefit.

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with basilar artery occlusion within 12 hours of onset, the benefits of endovascular thrombectomy at 1 year compared with 90 days were sustained for favorable (mRS score 0-3) outcome and enhanced for excellent (mRS score 0-1) outcome.

Importance: Cerebral vasospasm largely contributes to a devastating outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), with limited therapeutic options.

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of localized nicardipine release implants positioned around the basal cerebral vasculature at risk for developing proximal vasospasm after aSAH.

Design, setting, and participants: This single-masked randomized clinical trial with a 52-week follow-up was performed between April 5, 2020, and January 23, 2023, at 6 academic neurovascular centers in Germany and Austria. Consecutive patients with World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade 3 or 4 aSAH due to a ruptured anterior circulation aneurysm requiring microsurgical aneurysm repair participated.

Intervention: During aneurysm repair, patients were randomized 1:1 to intraoperatively receive 10 implants at 4 mg of nicardipine each plus standard of care (implant group) or aneurysm repair alone plus standard of care (control group).

Main outcome and measures: The primary end point was the incidence of moderate to severe cerebral angiographic vasospasm (aVS) between days 7 and 9 after aneurysm rupture as determined by digital subtraction angiography.

Results: Of 41 patients, 20 were randomized to the control group (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [9.1] years; 17 female [85%]) and 21 to the implant group (mean [SD] age, 53.6 [11.9] years; 14 female [67%]). A total of 39 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis. In the control group, 11 of 19 patients (58%) developed moderate or severe aVS compared with 4 of 20 patients (20%) in the implant group (P = .02). This outcome was paralleled by a lower clinical need for vasospasm rescue therapy in the implant group (2 of 20 patients [10%]) compared with the control group (11 of 19 patients [58%]; P = .002). Between days 13 and 15 after aneurysm rupture, new cerebral infarcts were noted in 6 of 19 patients (32%) in the control group and in 2 of 20 patients (10%) in the implant group (P = .13). At 52 weeks, favorable outcomes were noted in 12 of 18 patients (67%) in the control group and 16 of 19 patients (84%) in the implant group (P = .27). The adverse event rate did not differ between groups.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings show that placing nicardipine release implants during microsurgical aneurysm repair can provide safe and effective prevention of moderate to severe aVS after aSAH. A phase 3 clinical trial to investigate the effect of nicardipine implants on clinical outcome may be warranted.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04269408.

Importance: Anti-β-amyloid immunotherapy using lecanemab is becoming increasingly available to patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) develop AD neuropathology by age 40 years, representing a significant cohort of genetically determined AD.

Objective: To investigate the binding properties of lecanemab in the brains of people with DS, in anticipation of their inclusion in clinical trials or access to antiamyloid immunotherapies.

Design, setting, participants: The study included cases of postmortem brain tissue analysis from 15 individuals with DS aged 43 to 68 years that were acquired from Alzheimer Disease research centers at the University of California, Irvine and the University of Kentucky from 2008 to 2021. Data were analyzed from August 2023 through May 2024.

Exposure: The binding properties of lecanemab were assessed in brain tissue.

Main outcome: The primary outcome was the extent of lecanemab binding to amyloid plaques and brain blood vessels.

Results: Tissue from 15 people (8 were female [53%]) with DS ranging in age from 43 to 68 (mean, 56.6) years were included in the study. Lecanemab-labeled amyloid plaques appeared in all 15 DS cases studied, indicating potential target engagement. However, extensive binding of lecanemab to brain blood vessels in DS was observed, raising significant safety concerns. These findings underscore the necessity for clinical trials of lecanemab in people with DS to evaluate both safety and efficacy, particularly in individuals older than 43 years.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest significant binding of lecanemab to cerebral amyloid angiopathy in DS. Lecanemab should be rigorously tested in clinical trials for AD in the DS population to determine its safety and efficacy, especially in those older than 43 years.