Yushi Huang, Yongqiu Li, Xiwei Lou, Jessica Y Islam, Muxuan Liang, Thomas J George, Jiang Bian, Yi Guo
Background: Breast cancer screening is crucial for early detection and improved survival in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) patients, but real-world evidence of its effects on survival and prognosis remains insufficient.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data (1999 to 2019) to analyze the impact of breast cancer screening on prognosis (ie cancer stage) and survival in ADRD women with breast cancer diagnosed ≥ 67 years. Logistic and Cox regression models were employed to assess the relationship between screening and risk of advanced stage at diagnosis, and length of survival, adjusted for relevant covariates (e.x. marital status, comorbidities, age at screening).
Results: The cohort included 8,739 ADRD patients with breast cancer, with 4,483 completed at least one screening between their ADRD and first breast cancer diagnosis. The cohort completed screening had significant lower rates of advanced-stage diagnosis (22.2% vs 42.6%) and longer survival (65.9 vs 45.7 months) compared to the cohort without any screening history. Unscreened patients had 2.7 times higher odds of advanced-stage diagnosis, and 2 times higher hazard of death than patients with at least one screening completed before breast cancer diagnosis. Effects of comorbidities, age, and race were significant on both diagnosis stage and survival in breast cancer patients.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the benefit of screening in early diagnosis and longer survival in ADRD patients with breast cancer, which advocates for an expansion of current breast cancer screening recommendations to more effectively guide cancer care for ADRD patients.
{"title":"Breast cancer screening and cancer prognosis in patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.","authors":"Yushi Huang, Yongqiu Li, Xiwei Lou, Jessica Y Islam, Muxuan Liang, Thomas J George, Jiang Bian, Yi Guo","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkag019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkag019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer screening is crucial for early detection and improved survival in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) patients, but real-world evidence of its effects on survival and prognosis remains insufficient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data (1999 to 2019) to analyze the impact of breast cancer screening on prognosis (ie cancer stage) and survival in ADRD women with breast cancer diagnosed ≥ 67 years. Logistic and Cox regression models were employed to assess the relationship between screening and risk of advanced stage at diagnosis, and length of survival, adjusted for relevant covariates (e.x. marital status, comorbidities, age at screening).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 8,739 ADRD patients with breast cancer, with 4,483 completed at least one screening between their ADRD and first breast cancer diagnosis. The cohort completed screening had significant lower rates of advanced-stage diagnosis (22.2% vs 42.6%) and longer survival (65.9 vs 45.7 months) compared to the cohort without any screening history. Unscreened patients had 2.7 times higher odds of advanced-stage diagnosis, and 2 times higher hazard of death than patients with at least one screening completed before breast cancer diagnosis. Effects of comorbidities, age, and race were significant on both diagnosis stage and survival in breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated the benefit of screening in early diagnosis and longer survival in ADRD patients with breast cancer, which advocates for an expansion of current breast cancer screening recommendations to more effectively guide cancer care for ADRD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147317232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andres V Ardisson Korat, Emily L Deubler, Kimberly A Bertrand, Lauren R Teras, James V Lacey, Alpa V Patel, Bernard A Rosner, Yu-Hsiang Shu, Charlie Zhong, Sophia S Wang, Brenda M Birmann, Chun R Chao
Background: Prior studies suggest positive associations of type 2 diabetes (T2D) with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM), but few studies had sufficient statistical power to evaluate associations for specific histologic subtypes.
Methods: We pooled data from the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort, California Teachers' Study, Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Nurses' Health Study (NHS), and NHSII cohorts and a sample of Kaiser Permanente Southern California members (585,114 total study participants). We confirmed incident diagnoses of NHL and MM using medical records or cancer registries. T2D history was assessed by self-report or clinical diagnosis. We estimated the associations of T2D history (yes/no) and T2D duration with risk of overall NHL, NHL subtypes, or MM using multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, cohort, follow-up year, race, education, smoking, and body mass index.
Results: We confirmed 11,478 NHL and 2,783 MM diagnoses over a median follow-up of 20 years. T2D history was not associated with overall NHL risk but was positively associated with risk of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.28) and MM (1.20, 1.07-1.35) and inversely associated with risk of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (0.45, 0.27-0.75), T-cell NHL (0.78, 0.62-0.97), and mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome (0.67, 0.46-0.98). T2D duration was positively associated with risk of DLBCL and MM.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest a role for T2D in DLBCL and MM; thus, T2D prevention may be important in reducing their incidence. Some unexpected inverse associations require further investigation.
{"title":"Type 2 diabetes and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis.","authors":"Andres V Ardisson Korat, Emily L Deubler, Kimberly A Bertrand, Lauren R Teras, James V Lacey, Alpa V Patel, Bernard A Rosner, Yu-Hsiang Shu, Charlie Zhong, Sophia S Wang, Brenda M Birmann, Chun R Chao","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkag017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkag017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior studies suggest positive associations of type 2 diabetes (T2D) with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM), but few studies had sufficient statistical power to evaluate associations for specific histologic subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We pooled data from the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort, California Teachers' Study, Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Nurses' Health Study (NHS), and NHSII cohorts and a sample of Kaiser Permanente Southern California members (585,114 total study participants). We confirmed incident diagnoses of NHL and MM using medical records or cancer registries. T2D history was assessed by self-report or clinical diagnosis. We estimated the associations of T2D history (yes/no) and T2D duration with risk of overall NHL, NHL subtypes, or MM using multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, cohort, follow-up year, race, education, smoking, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We confirmed 11,478 NHL and 2,783 MM diagnoses over a median follow-up of 20 years. T2D history was not associated with overall NHL risk but was positively associated with risk of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.28) and MM (1.20, 1.07-1.35) and inversely associated with risk of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (0.45, 0.27-0.75), T-cell NHL (0.78, 0.62-0.97), and mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome (0.67, 0.46-0.98). T2D duration was positively associated with risk of DLBCL and MM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest a role for T2D in DLBCL and MM; thus, T2D prevention may be important in reducing their incidence. Some unexpected inverse associations require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jie Jane Chen, Jean Feng, Isabel D Friesner, Chichi Chang, Clodagh Kenny, Marianna V Elia, Lisa Ni, Felix Y Feng, Michael W Rabow, Steve E Braunstein, Lauren C Boreta, Julian C Hong
Background: Radiotherapy (RT) plays a crucial role in managing cancer-related symptoms. This study characterized symptom documentation, especially pain, preceding bone metastasis (BM) diagnosis and initiation of RT for BM, using natural language processing (NLP) approaches.
Methods: A de-identified cohort of patients who received RT for BM at a single tertiary-care institution (2013-2023) was created. Clinical data, notes, and metadata were computationally extracted. A previously validated NLP pipeline based on the clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System was used to extract CTCAE-encoded symptoms from all notes in the 30 days preceding BM diagnosis and each course of RT for BM. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between clinical and demographic variables and pain documentation.
Results: 1,061 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [54-72] years; 582 [54.9%] men) received 1,718 courses of RT for BM. The most common documented symptoms before BM diagnosis and first RT for BM, respectively, were BM-related pain (52.5% vs 91.6%, p < .001), nausea (20.8% vs 48.9%, p < .001), and constipation (12.8% vs 34.2%, p < .001). Prior to BM diagnosis, multiracial/other race (OR = 0.61 [95% CI 0.38-0.99], p = .045) was associated with decreased pain documentation compared to white race. Prior to RT for BM, women (OR = 1.48 [95% CI 1.02-2.15], p = .039) had increased pain documentation compared to men.
Conclusions: Women and multiracial/other race patients experienced a relative increase in pain documentation from BM diagnosis to RT for BM. This may reflect differential decision-making for which patients are offered RT for BM sooner in the symptom trajectory. Interventions are needed to increase equitable distribution of RT.
背景:放射治疗(RT)在治疗癌症相关症状中起着至关重要的作用。本研究使用自然语言处理(NLP)方法,描述了症状记录,特别是疼痛,骨转移(BM)前诊断和骨转移治疗的开始。方法:在单一的三级医疗机构(2013-2023)创建了一个去识别的接受BM RT治疗的患者队列。通过计算提取临床数据、记录和元数据。使用先前验证的基于临床文本分析和知识提取系统的NLP管道,从BM诊断前30天的所有记录和BM的每个疗程的RT中提取ctcae编码的症状。逻辑回归分析检验了临床和人口学变量与疼痛记录之间的关系。结果:1061例患者(中位[IQR]年龄64[54-72]岁;582例(54.9%)男性)接受了1718个疗程的BM治疗。在BM诊断和首次BM治疗前最常见的记录症状分别是BM相关疼痛(52.5% vs 91.6%)。结论:女性和多种族/其他种族患者从BM诊断到BM治疗后的疼痛记录相对增加。这可能反映了在症状发展轨迹中,哪些患者更早接受BM的RT治疗的不同决策。需要采取干预措施,以增加RT的公平分配。
{"title":"Natural language processing to identify documented pain preceding radiotherapy for bone metastases.","authors":"Jie Jane Chen, Jean Feng, Isabel D Friesner, Chichi Chang, Clodagh Kenny, Marianna V Elia, Lisa Ni, Felix Y Feng, Michael W Rabow, Steve E Braunstein, Lauren C Boreta, Julian C Hong","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkag010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkag010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiotherapy (RT) plays a crucial role in managing cancer-related symptoms. This study characterized symptom documentation, especially pain, preceding bone metastasis (BM) diagnosis and initiation of RT for BM, using natural language processing (NLP) approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A de-identified cohort of patients who received RT for BM at a single tertiary-care institution (2013-2023) was created. Clinical data, notes, and metadata were computationally extracted. A previously validated NLP pipeline based on the clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System was used to extract CTCAE-encoded symptoms from all notes in the 30 days preceding BM diagnosis and each course of RT for BM. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between clinical and demographic variables and pain documentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,061 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [54-72] years; 582 [54.9%] men) received 1,718 courses of RT for BM. The most common documented symptoms before BM diagnosis and first RT for BM, respectively, were BM-related pain (52.5% vs 91.6%, p < .001), nausea (20.8% vs 48.9%, p < .001), and constipation (12.8% vs 34.2%, p < .001). Prior to BM diagnosis, multiracial/other race (OR = 0.61 [95% CI 0.38-0.99], p = .045) was associated with decreased pain documentation compared to white race. Prior to RT for BM, women (OR = 1.48 [95% CI 1.02-2.15], p = .039) had increased pain documentation compared to men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women and multiracial/other race patients experienced a relative increase in pain documentation from BM diagnosis to RT for BM. This may reflect differential decision-making for which patients are offered RT for BM sooner in the symptom trajectory. Interventions are needed to increase equitable distribution of RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aniek Bonhof, Anouk E Hiensch, Nicolette J Wierdsma, Linde F Huis In 't Veld, Sandra D Bakker, Aart Beeker, Marjan Davidis-van Schoonhoven, Helga Droogendijk, Jan C Drooger, Joeri A J Douma, Ruben S A Goedegebuure, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Irene E G van Hellemond, Karin Herbschleb, Johan J B Janssen, Bianca Mostert, Marije Slingerland, Dirkje Sommeijer, Liesbeth Timmermans, Arjan J Verschoor, Vincent A de Weger, Harm Westdorp, Miriam L Wumkes, Anne M May, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Background: Patients with incurable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GAC) have an impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Exercise combined with nutritional support may improve this outcome. Careful evaluation of this supportive care strategy is needed to avoid burdening patients at this vulnerable stage with interventions that may offer no (meaningful) benefit. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of a combined exercise and nutritional intervention on HRQoL in.
Patient: s with incurable GAC.
Methods: RADICES is a multicenter randomized controlled trial aiming to include 196 patients with incurable GAC. Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) to a patient tailored intervention or a control group. The intervention group is provided with two training sessions per week and biweekly nutritional consultations, delivered by trained physiotherapists and dietitians, during 12 weeks. The control group receives usual care supplemented with general physical activity advice.The primary outcome is the difference in HRQoL between the intervention group and the control group at 12 weeks, accounting for baseline HRQoL, measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score. HRQoL is assessed at baseline, 6, 12 weeks, and every 3 months thereafter up to 1 year. Key secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes, cardiorespiratory fitness, dietary intake, disease progression, overall survival and cost-effectiveness. Adherence and safety are monitored throughout the intervention period.
Discussion: This study will generate evidence on the effectiveness of a patient tailored combined exercise and nutritional intervention in patients with incurable GAC. If effective for HRQoL, this intervention could be integrated into standard care for patients with incurable GAC.
{"title":"Effects of exercise and diet in patients with incurable gastroesophageal cancer: the RADICES study.","authors":"Aniek Bonhof, Anouk E Hiensch, Nicolette J Wierdsma, Linde F Huis In 't Veld, Sandra D Bakker, Aart Beeker, Marjan Davidis-van Schoonhoven, Helga Droogendijk, Jan C Drooger, Joeri A J Douma, Ruben S A Goedegebuure, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Irene E G van Hellemond, Karin Herbschleb, Johan J B Janssen, Bianca Mostert, Marije Slingerland, Dirkje Sommeijer, Liesbeth Timmermans, Arjan J Verschoor, Vincent A de Weger, Harm Westdorp, Miriam L Wumkes, Anne M May, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkag006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkag006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with incurable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GAC) have an impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Exercise combined with nutritional support may improve this outcome. Careful evaluation of this supportive care strategy is needed to avoid burdening patients at this vulnerable stage with interventions that may offer no (meaningful) benefit. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of a combined exercise and nutritional intervention on HRQoL in.</p><p><strong>Patient: </strong>s with incurable GAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RADICES is a multicenter randomized controlled trial aiming to include 196 patients with incurable GAC. Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) to a patient tailored intervention or a control group. The intervention group is provided with two training sessions per week and biweekly nutritional consultations, delivered by trained physiotherapists and dietitians, during 12 weeks. The control group receives usual care supplemented with general physical activity advice.The primary outcome is the difference in HRQoL between the intervention group and the control group at 12 weeks, accounting for baseline HRQoL, measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score. HRQoL is assessed at baseline, 6, 12 weeks, and every 3 months thereafter up to 1 year. Key secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes, cardiorespiratory fitness, dietary intake, disease progression, overall survival and cost-effectiveness. Adherence and safety are monitored throughout the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will generate evidence on the effectiveness of a patient tailored combined exercise and nutritional intervention in patients with incurable GAC. If effective for HRQoL, this intervention could be integrated into standard care for patients with incurable GAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146063568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Samuel X Stevens, Isaac Y Addo, Ella El-Katateny, Brynna Rollins, Richard De Abreu Lourenço, Christopher M Booth, Joanne Shaw, Janette L Vardy
Background: People with advanced cancer often invest substantial amounts of time to receive palliative treatments. This has been labeled the "time toxicity" of cancer treatment. However, stakeholder views on time toxicity are still being established. This study used mixed methods to explore Australian oncologists' perspectives on the time burdens of palliative systemic cancer treatments.
Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of gastrointestinal oncologists recruited from 1 metropolitan and 1 regional center, supplemented by online advertising through the Australian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Themes emerging from initial interviews (n = 8) informed the development of an online survey disseminated to Australian oncologists via professional groups. Qualitative data were analyzed using an inductive approach. Survey data were summarized descriptively.
Results: Fifteen oncologists were interviewed, 60% of whom were primarily based in major metropolitan areas. One overarching theme-the value of time-unified 4 subthemes: (1) contributors to time toxicity, (2) benefits and uncertainties, (3) time as a decision-modifier, and (4) proposed solutions. Surveyed oncologists (n = 108) expressed broad agreement with the thematic framework in interviews, affirming the importance of time for patients with advanced cancer and supporting strategies to reduce time burdens. However, responses acknowledged the subjectivity of time toxicity to individual patients.
Conclusions: This mixed-methods study establishes Australian oncologists' perspectives on the time toxicity of palliative systemic cancer treatments, identifying potential barriers and opportunities for including discussions of health-care time into shared decision making, and system-level strategies for addressing unwanted health-care contact time.
{"title":"Oncologist perspectives on the time toxicity of palliative systemic treatments for advanced cancer.","authors":"Samuel X Stevens, Isaac Y Addo, Ella El-Katateny, Brynna Rollins, Richard De Abreu Lourenço, Christopher M Booth, Joanne Shaw, Janette L Vardy","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf111","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with advanced cancer often invest substantial amounts of time to receive palliative treatments. This has been labeled the \"time toxicity\" of cancer treatment. However, stakeholder views on time toxicity are still being established. This study used mixed methods to explore Australian oncologists' perspectives on the time burdens of palliative systemic cancer treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of gastrointestinal oncologists recruited from 1 metropolitan and 1 regional center, supplemented by online advertising through the Australian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Themes emerging from initial interviews (n = 8) informed the development of an online survey disseminated to Australian oncologists via professional groups. Qualitative data were analyzed using an inductive approach. Survey data were summarized descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen oncologists were interviewed, 60% of whom were primarily based in major metropolitan areas. One overarching theme-the value of time-unified 4 subthemes: (1) contributors to time toxicity, (2) benefits and uncertainties, (3) time as a decision-modifier, and (4) proposed solutions. Surveyed oncologists (n = 108) expressed broad agreement with the thematic framework in interviews, affirming the importance of time for patients with advanced cancer and supporting strategies to reduce time burdens. However, responses acknowledged the subjectivity of time toxicity to individual patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This mixed-methods study establishes Australian oncologists' perspectives on the time toxicity of palliative systemic cancer treatments, identifying potential barriers and opportunities for including discussions of health-care time into shared decision making, and system-level strategies for addressing unwanted health-care contact time.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12936397/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146258200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sim Yee Cindy Tan, Isaac Yeboah Addo, Gemma Collett, Emily Price, Eliza R Macdonald, Shannon Gerber, Jane Turner, Liane Lee, Hau Yi Yau, Jaclyn Spencer, Sama Saleem, Antonia Pearson, Frances Boyle, Stephen Della-Fiorentina, Belinda E Kiely, Natalie Taylor, Jasmine Yee, Richard De Abreu Lourenco, Adrian Bauman, Haryana M Dhillon, Janette L Vardy
Background: Weight gain and physical inactivity during chemotherapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer are common. We sought to investigate the feasibility of a virtual lifestyle (exercise and diet) intervention for breast cancer survivors during chemotherapy.
Methods: This single-arm phase 2 trial delivered 12 weekly 1-hour telehealth sessions of supervised exercise and diet education to breast cancer survivors (patients with stage I-III disease) starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Screening, recruitment, intervention, and study assessments completed at baseline (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 3 months after the intervention (T2) were conducted by telehealth in 2022-2023. The primary outcome was that at least 60% of participants achieved 50% of the predetermined exercise and dietary goals. Secondary outcomes were acceptability (participation, attendance, completion), physical health, and lifestyle outcomes.
Results: Of 73 referrals, 60 individuals were eligible, 58 (97%) provided consent, 51 (85%) commenced the intervention, and 34 (57%) completed at least 1 postintervention assessment (completion rate = 67%). The mean (SD) age of participants was 51 (8.8) years, and 50% of participants were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Attendance was lower for exercise than for diet sessions (44% vs 62% attended ≥75% sessions). At T1, 36% of participants adhered to at at least 50% of the preset goals, improving at T2 (62.5%). Weight was not statistically significantly different between T0 and T1 (P = .199) but increased substantially at T2 (P = .018). Average waist circumference was reduced at T1 (‒1.9 cm, P = .014) and at T2 (‒3.3 cm, P < .001). Weekly exercise time increased by 38.5 minutes from T0 to T1 (P = .038), and the proportion of participants who met exercise guidelines improved from 6% (T0) to 41% (T2).
Conclusion: Our primary outcome was not achieved immediately after the intervention but was observed 3 months later. Individuals completing the intervention attended at least half the diet and exercise sessions during chemotherapy. Results of this study will inform design of a phase 3 study.
背景:早期乳腺癌患者在化疗期间体重增加和缺乏运动是很常见的。目的:探讨虚拟生活方式(运动和饮食)干预化疗期间乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)的可行性。方法:这项单臂II期试验为BCS (I-III期)开始(新)辅助化疗提供每周12次1小时的远程医疗会议,在监督下进行运动和饮食教育。2022-2023年通过远程医疗在基线(T0)、干预后立即(T1)和干预后3个月(T2)完成筛查、招募、干预和研究评估。主要结局:≥60%的参与者达到了预定运动和/或饮食目标的50%。次要结局:可接受性(参与、出勤、完成)、身体健康和生活方式结局。结果:在73例转诊患者中,60例符合条件,58例(97%)同意,51例(85%)开始干预,34例完成≥1项干预后评估(完成率67%)。平均年龄51岁(SD8.8), 50%为新辅助化疗。运动组的出勤率低于节食组(44% vs 62%)。在T1时,36%的参与者坚持≥50%的预设目标,在T2时改善(62.5%)。体重在t1 - t1无显著差异(p = 0.199),但在T2显著增加(p = 0.018)。T1时平均腰围减小(-1.9 cm, p =。结论:我们的主要结局不是在干预后立即达到的,而是在3个月后观察到的。那些完成干预的人在化疗期间至少参加了一半的饮食和锻炼。结果将为III期研究的设计提供信息。
{"title":"Feasibility evaluation of a virtual lifestyle intervention for early-stage breast cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapy.","authors":"Sim Yee Cindy Tan, Isaac Yeboah Addo, Gemma Collett, Emily Price, Eliza R Macdonald, Shannon Gerber, Jane Turner, Liane Lee, Hau Yi Yau, Jaclyn Spencer, Sama Saleem, Antonia Pearson, Frances Boyle, Stephen Della-Fiorentina, Belinda E Kiely, Natalie Taylor, Jasmine Yee, Richard De Abreu Lourenco, Adrian Bauman, Haryana M Dhillon, Janette L Vardy","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf122","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Weight gain and physical inactivity during chemotherapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer are common. We sought to investigate the feasibility of a virtual lifestyle (exercise and diet) intervention for breast cancer survivors during chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-arm phase 2 trial delivered 12 weekly 1-hour telehealth sessions of supervised exercise and diet education to breast cancer survivors (patients with stage I-III disease) starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Screening, recruitment, intervention, and study assessments completed at baseline (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 3 months after the intervention (T2) were conducted by telehealth in 2022-2023. The primary outcome was that at least 60% of participants achieved 50% of the predetermined exercise and dietary goals. Secondary outcomes were acceptability (participation, attendance, completion), physical health, and lifestyle outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 73 referrals, 60 individuals were eligible, 58 (97%) provided consent, 51 (85%) commenced the intervention, and 34 (57%) completed at least 1 postintervention assessment (completion rate = 67%). The mean (SD) age of participants was 51 (8.8) years, and 50% of participants were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Attendance was lower for exercise than for diet sessions (44% vs 62% attended ≥75% sessions). At T1, 36% of participants adhered to at at least 50% of the preset goals, improving at T2 (62.5%). Weight was not statistically significantly different between T0 and T1 (P = .199) but increased substantially at T2 (P = .018). Average waist circumference was reduced at T1 (‒1.9 cm, P = .014) and at T2 (‒3.3 cm, P < .001). Weekly exercise time increased by 38.5 minutes from T0 to T1 (P = .038), and the proportion of participants who met exercise guidelines improved from 6% (T0) to 41% (T2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our primary outcome was not achieved immediately after the intervention but was observed 3 months later. Individuals completing the intervention attended at least half the diet and exercise sessions during chemotherapy. Results of this study will inform design of a phase 3 study.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12909259/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BRCA1 pathogenic variants are associated with a lower risk of developing prostate cancer than BRCA2, but aggressiveness remains unclear. Therefore, screening criteria are insufficiently established. Here, we reanalyzed the impact of BRCA1 pathogenic variants on aggressiveness using 11 300 prostate cancer patients, adjusting for age and area. The proportion of aggressive prostate cancer was higher in BRCA1 carriers (86.7%) than in noncarriers (61.1%) (odds ratio = 4.87; 95% confidence interval = 1.05 to 22.60). The proportion of high prostate-specific antigen levels was higher in BRCA1 carriers (66.7%) than in noncarriers (27.9%) (P = 7.61 × 10-3). BRCA1 carriers had a worse tendency than noncarriers for T classification (T3-4: BRCA1, 36.4%; noncarriers, 23.2%) and Gleason score (GS8-10: BRCA1, 53.3%; noncarriers, 31.0%). Moreover, we observed the first case of BRCA1-related aggressive prostate cancer showing long-term survival through early detection and multidisciplinary treatment. These results suggest that recommendations for early prostate cancer screening might need to be reconsidered for BRCA1 carriers.
{"title":"Revisiting the impact of BRCA1 pathogenic variants on the aggressiveness of prostate cancer.","authors":"Hajime Sasagawa, Shintaro Narita, Koichi Matsuda, Takeo Kosaka, Yukihide Momozawa","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf118","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BRCA1 pathogenic variants are associated with a lower risk of developing prostate cancer than BRCA2, but aggressiveness remains unclear. Therefore, screening criteria are insufficiently established. Here, we reanalyzed the impact of BRCA1 pathogenic variants on aggressiveness using 11 300 prostate cancer patients, adjusting for age and area. The proportion of aggressive prostate cancer was higher in BRCA1 carriers (86.7%) than in noncarriers (61.1%) (odds ratio = 4.87; 95% confidence interval = 1.05 to 22.60). The proportion of high prostate-specific antigen levels was higher in BRCA1 carriers (66.7%) than in noncarriers (27.9%) (P = 7.61 × 10-3). BRCA1 carriers had a worse tendency than noncarriers for T classification (T3-4: BRCA1, 36.4%; noncarriers, 23.2%) and Gleason score (GS8-10: BRCA1, 53.3%; noncarriers, 31.0%). Moreover, we observed the first case of BRCA1-related aggressive prostate cancer showing long-term survival through early detection and multidisciplinary treatment. These results suggest that recommendations for early prostate cancer screening might need to be reconsidered for BRCA1 carriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803783/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145804490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karen J Ortiz-Ortiz, Marjorie Vázquez-Roldán, Axel Gierbolini-Bermúdez, María Ramos-Fernández, Carlos R Torres-Cintrón, Yisel Pagán-Santana, Tonatiuh Suárez-Ramos, Kalyani Sonawane
Background: Hospice services play an important role in end-of-life (EoL) care. In Puerto Rico, Medicaid had no provisions for hospice care until July 2024, representing a significant public health challenge. This study examined the association between hospice coverage policy and EoL outcomes among patients with cancer enrolled in Medicaid.
Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study analyzed data of cancer patients enrolled in Medicaid from the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry between 2011 and 2022 who died of cancer between 2016 and 2022. Hospice enrollment was categorized into timeframes before death: 1-7, 8-14, 15-30, 31-90, 91-120, and 121-180 days. We compared total costs, healthcare utilization, and death in acute settings by hospice enrollment status.
Results: Of 4481 patients in the study, 21.7% were enrolled in hospice. Non-hospice-enrolled patients had higher healthcare expenditures for the last 7 ($548; 95% confidence interval [CI ]= $166 to $931), 14 ($1619; 95% CI = $894 to $2344), 30 ($3410; 95% CI = $2263 to $4557), 90 ($4896; 95% CI = $1987 to $7804), 120 ($6171; 95% CI = $61 to $12 281), and 180 ($19 291; 95% CI = $10 851 to $27 731) days than hospice-enrolled patients. Emergency department visit rates and hospitalization rates were higher for all periods (P < .05) for non-hospice-enrolled patients than for hospice-enrolled patients. Similarly, non-hospice-enrolled patients had a higher likelihood of dying in acute settings (P < .05).
Conclusion: Hospice enrollment among Medicaid enrollees was associated with lower health expenditure, lower healthcare resource utilization, and a lower likelihood of mortality in an acute setting. The recent policy change to include hospice services coverage in Puerto Rico Medicaid is a positive step that must be sustained beyond 2027.
{"title":"Hospice care for Medicaid cancer patients in Puerto Rico: implications on healthcare costs and utilization.","authors":"Karen J Ortiz-Ortiz, Marjorie Vázquez-Roldán, Axel Gierbolini-Bermúdez, María Ramos-Fernández, Carlos R Torres-Cintrón, Yisel Pagán-Santana, Tonatiuh Suárez-Ramos, Kalyani Sonawane","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf123","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf123","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospice services play an important role in end-of-life (EoL) care. In Puerto Rico, Medicaid had no provisions for hospice care until July 2024, representing a significant public health challenge. This study examined the association between hospice coverage policy and EoL outcomes among patients with cancer enrolled in Medicaid.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based retrospective cohort study analyzed data of cancer patients enrolled in Medicaid from the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry between 2011 and 2022 who died of cancer between 2016 and 2022. Hospice enrollment was categorized into timeframes before death: 1-7, 8-14, 15-30, 31-90, 91-120, and 121-180 days. We compared total costs, healthcare utilization, and death in acute settings by hospice enrollment status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4481 patients in the study, 21.7% were enrolled in hospice. Non-hospice-enrolled patients had higher healthcare expenditures for the last 7 ($548; 95% confidence interval [CI ]= $166 to $931), 14 ($1619; 95% CI = $894 to $2344), 30 ($3410; 95% CI = $2263 to $4557), 90 ($4896; 95% CI = $1987 to $7804), 120 ($6171; 95% CI = $61 to $12 281), and 180 ($19 291; 95% CI = $10 851 to $27 731) days than hospice-enrolled patients. Emergency department visit rates and hospitalization rates were higher for all periods (P < .05) for non-hospice-enrolled patients than for hospice-enrolled patients. Similarly, non-hospice-enrolled patients had a higher likelihood of dying in acute settings (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospice enrollment among Medicaid enrollees was associated with lower health expenditure, lower healthcare resource utilization, and a lower likelihood of mortality in an acute setting. The recent policy change to include hospice services coverage in Puerto Rico Medicaid is a positive step that must be sustained beyond 2027.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12828692/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145846348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anlan Cao, Brenda Cartmel, Elena Ratner, Fang-Yong Li, Matthew P Schlumbrecht, Amanika Kumar, Tracy E Crane, Denise A Esserman, Melinda L Irwin, Leah M Ferrucci
Background: Several ovarian cancer studies have suggested that a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher is associated with lower compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended chemotherapy but primarily involved treatment before 2012, when dose capping was recommended for patients with higher body surface areas. Updated analyses in the contemporary treatment era are warranted.
Methods: In a retrospective cohort of patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer receiving curative-intent carboplatin plus paclitaxel in the Yale-Smilow Cancer Network (2012-2022), we evaluated BMI at diagnosis in relation to relative dose intensity (RDI)-the ratio of completed chemotherapy dose intensity to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended dose intensity-which reflects dose modification both before and during treatment. We also assessed starting RDI (which reflects modifications before treatment) and received RDI (which reflects modifications during treatment). Data on hospitalizations and hematological chemotoxicities were collected. We examined the association between BMI (<25, 25-30, ≥30) and chemotherapy completion, hospitalizations, and toxicities using multivariable linear and logistic regressions.
Results: Among 327 patients, the average RDI was 79.7%, and 44.3% had an RDI below 85%. Mean (SD) starting and received RDI were 97.9% (9.1%) and 81.8% (25.7%), respectively. Higher BMI was associated with higher RDI (Paggregate = .03) and received RDI (Paggregate = .04). Body mass index was not associated with starting RDI, dose reductions, delays, hospitalizations, or hematological toxicities.
Conclusions: Among patients with ovarian cancer treated since 2012, the overall RDI was low. Relative dose intensity was higher among patients with a BMI of 25 or higher compared with a BMI below 25. Most dose modifications occurred during treatment and not before initiation. Studies with body composition data and interventions that maximize chemotherapy completion during treatment are warranted.
{"title":"Body mass index and chemotherapy completion among patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer.","authors":"Anlan Cao, Brenda Cartmel, Elena Ratner, Fang-Yong Li, Matthew P Schlumbrecht, Amanika Kumar, Tracy E Crane, Denise A Esserman, Melinda L Irwin, Leah M Ferrucci","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf121","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several ovarian cancer studies have suggested that a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher is associated with lower compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended chemotherapy but primarily involved treatment before 2012, when dose capping was recommended for patients with higher body surface areas. Updated analyses in the contemporary treatment era are warranted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective cohort of patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer receiving curative-intent carboplatin plus paclitaxel in the Yale-Smilow Cancer Network (2012-2022), we evaluated BMI at diagnosis in relation to relative dose intensity (RDI)-the ratio of completed chemotherapy dose intensity to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended dose intensity-which reflects dose modification both before and during treatment. We also assessed starting RDI (which reflects modifications before treatment) and received RDI (which reflects modifications during treatment). Data on hospitalizations and hematological chemotoxicities were collected. We examined the association between BMI (<25, 25-30, ≥30) and chemotherapy completion, hospitalizations, and toxicities using multivariable linear and logistic regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 327 patients, the average RDI was 79.7%, and 44.3% had an RDI below 85%. Mean (SD) starting and received RDI were 97.9% (9.1%) and 81.8% (25.7%), respectively. Higher BMI was associated with higher RDI (Paggregate = .03) and received RDI (Paggregate = .04). Body mass index was not associated with starting RDI, dose reductions, delays, hospitalizations, or hematological toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with ovarian cancer treated since 2012, the overall RDI was low. Relative dose intensity was higher among patients with a BMI of 25 or higher compared with a BMI below 25. Most dose modifications occurred during treatment and not before initiation. Studies with body composition data and interventions that maximize chemotherapy completion during treatment are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12854082/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145827598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shalini Subramaniam, Kim Tam Bui, Martin R Stockler, Belinda E Kiely
Background: Patients with metastatic cancer are living longer due to treatment advances. We explored oncologists' perceptions about curability in metastatic cancer.
Methods: We invited medical oncologists to complete a 21-item online survey. We conducted descriptive analyses and thematically analyzed free-text responses.
Results: A total of 126 respondents completed the survey. The median age was 39 years (range = 27-75). Most respondents worked in Australian (64%), metropolitan (88%), public practices (56%). The most frequently treated cancer types were breast (55%), lung (52%), and colorectal (50%). In total, 82% reported thinking that patients with metastatic cancer can be cured. Cancer types with the highest perceived chance of cure (median percentage) were testicular (81%), melanoma (32%), and colorectal (16%). At the time of diagnosis of metastatic cancer, 51% reported they would tell a patient that cure was possible. After treatment, 29% reported telling some patients they had been cured, whereas 74% reported telling some patients that they may have been cured. A higher proportion thought cure was a realistic possibility with immunotherapy (83%) rather than chemotherapy (40%), but only 44% and 27%, respectively, reported they would tell this to patients. In total, 46% reported discussing the possibility of cure more frequently with immunotherapy, 5% more frequently with chemotherapy, 7% as frequently with both, and 42% not discussing with either. Respondents identified oligometastatic disease, actionable mutations, and durable responses to immunotherapy as factors associated with cure.
Conclusions: Most respondents reported thinking that metastatic cancer is curable but were reluctant to tell individual patients with metastatic cancer they had been cured.
{"title":"Curability of metastatic cancer: a survey of medical oncologists.","authors":"Shalini Subramaniam, Kim Tam Bui, Martin R Stockler, Belinda E Kiely","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf115","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with metastatic cancer are living longer due to treatment advances. We explored oncologists' perceptions about curability in metastatic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We invited medical oncologists to complete a 21-item online survey. We conducted descriptive analyses and thematically analyzed free-text responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 respondents completed the survey. The median age was 39 years (range = 27-75). Most respondents worked in Australian (64%), metropolitan (88%), public practices (56%). The most frequently treated cancer types were breast (55%), lung (52%), and colorectal (50%). In total, 82% reported thinking that patients with metastatic cancer can be cured. Cancer types with the highest perceived chance of cure (median percentage) were testicular (81%), melanoma (32%), and colorectal (16%). At the time of diagnosis of metastatic cancer, 51% reported they would tell a patient that cure was possible. After treatment, 29% reported telling some patients they had been cured, whereas 74% reported telling some patients that they may have been cured. A higher proportion thought cure was a realistic possibility with immunotherapy (83%) rather than chemotherapy (40%), but only 44% and 27%, respectively, reported they would tell this to patients. In total, 46% reported discussing the possibility of cure more frequently with immunotherapy, 5% more frequently with chemotherapy, 7% as frequently with both, and 42% not discussing with either. Respondents identified oligometastatic disease, actionable mutations, and durable responses to immunotherapy as factors associated with cure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most respondents reported thinking that metastatic cancer is curable but were reluctant to tell individual patients with metastatic cancer they had been cured.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12783893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145756213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}