首页 > 最新文献

JACC. Heart failure最新文献

英文 中文
Heart Failure Specialist Care and Long-Term Outcomes for Patients Admitted With Acute Heart Failure 急性心力衰竭入院患者的心力衰竭专科护理和长期疗效。
IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.06.013
Antonio Cannata MD , Mehrdad A. Mizani PhD , Daniel I. Bromage PhD , Susan E. Piper MD , Suzanna M.C. Hardman PhD , Cathie Sudlow PhD , Mark de Belder MD , Paul A. Scott MD , John Deanfield FRCP , Roy S. Gardner MD , Andrew L. Clark MD , John G.F. Cleland MD , Theresa A. McDonagh MD , CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium

Background

For patients with acute heart failure (HF), specialist HF care during admission improves diagnosis and treatments.

Objectives

The authors aimed to investigate the association of HF specialist care with in-hospital and longer term prognosis.

Methods

The authors used data from the National Heart Failure Audit from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, linked to electronic records for hospitalization and deaths. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome measure and in-hospital mortality the secondary outcome measure.

Results

Data for 227,170 patients admitted to hospital with HF (median age: 81 years; IQR: 72-88 years), were analyzed. Approximately 80% of acute HF admissions received support from HF specialists. Thirty-nine percent of patients (n = 70,720) were seen by a multidisciplinary team (HF physicians and heart failure specialist nurses [HFSNs]), 22% (n = 40,330) were seen by HFSNs alone, and the remaining 39% (n = 71,700) were seen exclusively by specialist HF physicians. At discharge, more patients who received HF specialist care were prescribed medical therapy for HF and had specialized follow-up. Conversely, diuretic agents were prescribed to fewer patients. HF specialist care was independently associated with a higher rate of prescribing HF therapies at discharge and a lower likelihood of receiving diuretic therapy (OR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86-0.95]; P < 0.001). HF specialist care was associated with better long-term survival (HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.87-0.90]; P < 0.001) and lower in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.0.88-0.97]; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Receiving HF specialist care during admission for HF is associated with a higher rate of implementation of medical therapy, fewer discharges on diuretic therapy, and lower in-hospital and long-term mortality across the left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum, especially for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
背景:对于急性心力衰竭(HF)患者而言,入院期间的专科 HF 护理可改善诊断和治疗:对于急性心力衰竭(HF)患者而言,入院期间的HF专科护理可改善诊断和治疗:作者旨在研究高血压专科护理与院内及长期预后的关系:作者使用了2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日的全国心衰审计数据,这些数据与住院和死亡的电子记录相关联。全因死亡率是主要结果指标,院内死亡率是次要结果指标:分析了 227170 名因高血压入院的患者(中位年龄:81 岁;IQR:72-88 岁)的数据。约 80% 的急性心房颤动入院患者得到了心房颤动专家的支持。39%的患者(n=70,720)由多学科团队(心房颤动医生和心房颤动专科护士[HFSNd])诊治,22%的患者(n=40,330)仅由心房颤动专科护士诊治,其余39%的患者(n=71,700)仅由心房颤动专科医生诊治。出院时,更多接受心房颤动专科治疗的患者得到了心房颤动药物治疗处方,并接受了专门的随访。相反,为更少的患者开具了利尿剂处方。接受心房颤动专科治疗的患者出院时接受心房颤动治疗的比例更高,接受利尿剂治疗的可能性更低(OR:0.90 [95% CI:0.86-0.95];P < 0.001)。心房颤动专科治疗与较好的长期生存率(HR:0.89 [95% CI:0.87-0.90];P <0.001)和较低的院内死亡率(OR:0.92 [95% CI:0.0.88-0.97];P 结论:心力衰竭患者在入院时接受心力衰竭专科治疗与较高的药物治疗实施率、较少的利尿剂治疗出院率以及较低的院内和长期死亡率有关,尤其是对于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者。
{"title":"Heart Failure Specialist Care and Long-Term Outcomes for Patients Admitted With Acute Heart Failure","authors":"Antonio Cannata MD ,&nbsp;Mehrdad A. Mizani PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel I. Bromage PhD ,&nbsp;Susan E. Piper MD ,&nbsp;Suzanna M.C. Hardman PhD ,&nbsp;Cathie Sudlow PhD ,&nbsp;Mark de Belder MD ,&nbsp;Paul A. Scott MD ,&nbsp;John Deanfield FRCP ,&nbsp;Roy S. Gardner MD ,&nbsp;Andrew L. Clark MD ,&nbsp;John G.F. Cleland MD ,&nbsp;Theresa A. McDonagh MD ,&nbsp;CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.06.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.06.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For patients with acute heart failure (HF), specialist HF care during admission improves diagnosis and treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The authors aimed to investigate the association of HF specialist care with in-hospital and longer term prognosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors used data from the National Heart Failure Audit from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, linked to electronic records for hospitalization and deaths. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome measure and in-hospital mortality the secondary outcome measure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data for 227,170 patients admitted to hospital with HF (median age: 81 years; IQR: 72-88 years), were analyzed. Approximately 80% of acute HF admissions received support from HF specialists. Thirty-nine percent of patients (n = 70,720) were seen by a multidisciplinary team (HF physicians and heart failure specialist nurses [HFSNs]), 22% (n = 40,330) were seen by HFSNs alone, and the remaining 39% (n = 71,700) were seen exclusively by specialist HF physicians. At discharge, more patients who received HF specialist care were prescribed medical therapy for HF and had specialized follow-up. Conversely, diuretic agents were prescribed to fewer patients. HF specialist care was independently associated with a higher rate of prescribing HF therapies at discharge and a lower likelihood of receiving diuretic therapy (OR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86-0.95]; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001). HF specialist care was associated with better long-term survival (HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.87-0.90]; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001) and lower in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.0.88-0.97]; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Receiving HF specialist care during admission for HF is associated with a higher rate of implementation of medical therapy, fewer discharges on diuretic therapy, and lower in-hospital and long-term mortality across the left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum, especially for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 402-413"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141901790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Donor Selection for Heart Transplantation in 2025 2024 年心脏移植的供体选择。
IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.09.016
Rashmi Jain MD , Evan P. Kransdorf MD, PhD , Jennifer Cowger MD , Valluvan Jeevanandam MD , Jon A. Kobashigawa MD
The number of candidates on the waiting list for heart transplantation (HT) continues to far outweigh the number of available organs, and the donor heart nonuse rate in the United States remains significantly higher than that of other regions such as Europe. Although predicting outcomes in HT remains challenging, our overall understanding of the factors that play a role in post-HT outcomes continues to grow. We observe that many donor risk factors that are deemed “high-risk” do not necessarily always adversely affect post-HT outcomes, but are in fact nuanced and interact with other donor and recipient risk factors. The field of HT continues to evolve, with ongoing development of technologies for organ preservation during transport, expansion of the practice of donation after circulatory death, and proposed changes to organ allocation policy. As such, the field must continue to refine its processes for donor selection and risk prediction in HT.
心脏移植(HT)候选者的数量仍然远远超过可用器官的数量,美国的供体心脏未使用率仍然明显高于欧洲等其他地区。尽管预测心脏移植的预后仍然具有挑战性,但我们对影响心脏移植后预后的因素的总体认识在不断加深。我们注意到,许多被认为是 "高风险 "的供体风险因素并不一定总是对 HT 术后结局产生不利影响,事实上,它们之间存在细微差别,并与其他供体和受体风险因素相互作用。随着运送过程中器官保存技术的不断发展、循环死亡后捐献实践的不断扩大以及器官分配政策的拟议变革,器官移植领域仍在继续发展。因此,该领域必须继续完善其在高温热疗中选择捐献者和预测风险的流程。
{"title":"Donor Selection for Heart Transplantation in 2025","authors":"Rashmi Jain MD ,&nbsp;Evan P. Kransdorf MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Cowger MD ,&nbsp;Valluvan Jeevanandam MD ,&nbsp;Jon A. Kobashigawa MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.09.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.09.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The number of candidates on the waiting list for heart transplantation (HT) continues to far outweigh the number of available organs, and the donor heart nonuse rate in the United States remains significantly higher than that of other regions such as Europe. Although predicting outcomes in HT remains challenging, our overall understanding of the factors that play a role in post-HT outcomes continues to grow. We observe that many donor risk factors that are deemed “high-risk” do not necessarily always adversely affect post-HT outcomes, but are in fact nuanced and interact with other donor and recipient risk factors. The field of HT continues to evolve, with ongoing development of technologies for organ preservation during transport, expansion of the practice of donation after circulatory death, and proposed changes to organ allocation policy. As such, the field must continue to refine its processes for donor selection and risk prediction in HT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 389-401"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142681998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Wet and Sent Home From Heart Failure Hospitalization
IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2025.01.006
Sean P. Collins MD, MSC , Hasan K. Siddiqi MD, MSCR , Lynne Warner Stevenson MD
{"title":"Wet and Sent Home From Heart Failure Hospitalization","authors":"Sean P. Collins MD, MSC ,&nbsp;Hasan K. Siddiqi MD, MSCR ,&nbsp;Lynne Warner Stevenson MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jchf.2025.01.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jchf.2025.01.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 430-434"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143548169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disparities Among Immigrants and Native Patients in Denmark With New-Onset Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.008
Sam Aiyad Ali MD , Naja Emborg Vinding MD , Jawad H. Butt MD , Johanna Krøll MD , Johan E. Larsson MD , Morten Schou MD, PhD , Emil L. Fosbøl MD, PhD , Brian B. Løgstrup MD, PhD, DMsc , Inge Schjødt RN, PhD , Pardeep S. Jhund MD , Lars Køber MD, DMSc , Finn Gustafsson MD, DMSc , Naveed Sattar MBChB, PhD , John J.V. McMurray MD , Søren Lund Kristensen MD, PhD

Background

Worldwide, major health care variations exist in patients with heart failure (HF).

Objectives

In this study, the authors sought to examine and compare immigrants grouped by region of origin and native Danish patients presenting with new-onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods

The authors used data from the Danish Heart Failure Registry and administrative registries comprising information on medication, comorbidity, vital status, income level, and education. The co-primary outcomes were uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and a composite of HF hospitalization and all-cause death.

Results

Overall, 55,918 patients were included, of whom 94.8% were native Danish patients, 3.0% originated from Europe/Central Asia, 1.1% from the Middle East/North Africa, 0.6% from South Asia, and 0.5% from other regions. Patients from the non-Western areas were around 10 years younger (median age 62 vs 72 years) and had more diabetes (38%-50% vs 20%) and ischemic heart disease (67%-74% vs 48%) and less atrial fibrillation (9%-15% vs 32%) compared with Danish patients (all P < 0.001). At 12 months’ follow-up, no major differences in attainment of ≥50% target daily doses of GDMT were observed across groups. The crude 3-year cumulative risk of HF hospitalization or all-cause death ranged from 25% to 37% and was lowest for non-Western immigrants, although this difference does not persist in age- and sex-matched analyses.

Conclusions

Patients in Denmark with HFrEF originating from non-Western parts of the world were younger and had more ischemic heart disease and diabetes and less atrial fibrillation compared with native Danish patients. The likelihood of GDMT uptitration at 12 months was similar to that of native Danish patients, whereas their risk of HF hospitalization or all-cause death was lower, although the difference between the 2 groups diminished in age- and sex-matched analyses.
{"title":"Disparities Among Immigrants and Native Patients in Denmark With New-Onset Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction","authors":"Sam Aiyad Ali MD ,&nbsp;Naja Emborg Vinding MD ,&nbsp;Jawad H. Butt MD ,&nbsp;Johanna Krøll MD ,&nbsp;Johan E. Larsson MD ,&nbsp;Morten Schou MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Emil L. Fosbøl MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Brian B. Løgstrup MD, PhD, DMsc ,&nbsp;Inge Schjødt RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Pardeep S. Jhund MD ,&nbsp;Lars Køber MD, DMSc ,&nbsp;Finn Gustafsson MD, DMSc ,&nbsp;Naveed Sattar MBChB, PhD ,&nbsp;John J.V. McMurray MD ,&nbsp;Søren Lund Kristensen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Worldwide, major health care variations exist in patients with heart failure (HF).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In this study, the authors sought to examine and compare immigrants grouped by region of origin and native Danish patients presenting with new-onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors used data from the Danish Heart Failure Registry and administrative registries comprising information on medication, comorbidity, vital status, income level, and education. The co-primary outcomes were uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and a composite of HF hospitalization and all-cause death.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 55,918 patients were included, of whom 94.8% were native Danish patients, 3.0% originated from Europe/Central Asia, 1.1% from the Middle East/North Africa, 0.6% from South Asia, and 0.5% from other regions. Patients from the non-Western areas were around 10 years younger (median age 62 vs 72 years) and had more diabetes (38%-50% vs 20%) and ischemic heart disease (67%-74% vs 48%) and less atrial fibrillation (9%-15% vs 32%) compared with Danish patients (all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). At 12 months’ follow-up, no major differences in attainment of ≥50% target daily doses of GDMT were observed across groups. The crude 3-year cumulative risk of HF hospitalization or all-cause death ranged from 25% to 37% and was lowest for non-Western immigrants, although this difference does not persist in age- and sex-matched analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients in Denmark with HFrEF originating from non-Western parts of the world were younger and had more ischemic heart disease and diabetes and less atrial fibrillation compared with native Danish patients. The likelihood of GDMT uptitration at 12 months was similar to that of native Danish patients, whereas their risk of HF hospitalization or all-cause death was lower, although the difference between the 2 groups diminished in age- and sex-matched analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 483-493"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Decongestion and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure 急性心力衰竭住院患者的充血和预后:来自RELAX-AHF-2试验的见解
IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.09.013
Matteo Pagnesi MD, PhD , Laura Staal PhD , Jozine M. ter Maaten MD, PhD , Iris E. Beldhuis MD , Gad Cotter MD , Beth A. Davison PhD , Niels Jongs PhD , G. Michael Felker MD, MHS , Gerasimos Filippatos MD , Barry H. Greenberg MD , Peter S. Pang MD , Piotr Ponikowski MD, PhD , Carlo Mario Lombardi MD , Marianna Adamo MD, PhD , Thomas Severin MD , Claudio Gimpelewicz MD , Adriaan A. Voors MD, PhD , John R. Teerlink MD , Marco Metra MD

Background

The prognostic importance of residual congestion after acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalization is still debated.

Objectives

The authors aimed to assess the impact of residual congestion in a large cohort of patients with AHF enrolled in the RELAX-AHF-2 (Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serelaxin When Added to Standard Therapy in AHF) trial.

Methods

Residual congestion was assessed at day 5 after admission among hospitalized patients using an established composite congestion score (CCS) based on the presence of orthopnea, peripheral edema, and increased jugular venous pressure, ranging from 0 to 8 points. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure or renal failure at 180 days.

Results

Among the 5,900 AHF patients included in this analysis, 3,380 (57.3%) had at least 1 sign of congestion (ie, CCS ≥1) and 1,066 (18.1%) had a CCS ≥3 at day 5 after admission. Patients with residual congestion at day 5 were more symptomatic, had more comorbidities, received higher doses of loop diuretic agents in-hospital, albeit with lower diuretic response, were less likely to have hemoconcentration, and were more likely to have worsening renal function at day 5. After multivariable adjustment for clinically meaningful variables, any sign of residual congestion and CCS ≥3 at day 5 were both independently associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint (adjusted HR: 1.32 [95% CI: 1.15-1.51]; P < 0.001 and adjusted HR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.39-1.88]; both P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Among patients with AHF who were still hospitalized at day 5, residual congestion was common and independently associated with worse outcome. (Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serelaxin When Added to Standard Therapy in AHF [RELAX-AHF-2]; NCT01870778)
背景:急性心力衰竭(AHF)住院后残余充血的预后重要性仍有争议。目的:作者旨在评估在一组参加Relaxin -AHF-2 (Relaxin in Acute Heart Failure 2)试验的AHF患者中残留充血的影响。方法:在住院患者入院后第5天,使用基于矫直、周围水肿和颈静脉压升高的综合充血评分(CCS)评估残余充血,评分范围从0到8分。主要终点是180天内心血管死亡或因心力衰竭或肾衰竭再住院的综合结果。结果:本分析纳入的5900例AHF患者中,3380例(57.3%)患者在入院后第5天至少有1种充血征像(即CCS≥1),1066例(18.1%)患者CCS≥3。第5天残留充血的患者症状更明显,有更多的合共病,在医院接受了更高剂量的环状利尿剂,尽管利尿反应较低,但血液浓缩的可能性更小,第5天肾功能恶化的可能性更大。在对有临床意义的变量进行多变量调整后,任何残留充血的迹象和第5天CCS≥3都与主要终点的高风险独立相关(调整后HR: 1.32 [95% CI: 1.15-1.51];结论:在第5天仍住院的AHF患者中,残余充血是常见的,并且与较差的预后独立相关。舒拉辛加入AHF标准治疗的疗效、安全性和耐受性[RELAX-AHF-2];NCT01870778)。
{"title":"Decongestion and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure","authors":"Matteo Pagnesi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Laura Staal PhD ,&nbsp;Jozine M. ter Maaten MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Iris E. Beldhuis MD ,&nbsp;Gad Cotter MD ,&nbsp;Beth A. Davison PhD ,&nbsp;Niels Jongs PhD ,&nbsp;G. Michael Felker MD, MHS ,&nbsp;Gerasimos Filippatos MD ,&nbsp;Barry H. Greenberg MD ,&nbsp;Peter S. Pang MD ,&nbsp;Piotr Ponikowski MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlo Mario Lombardi MD ,&nbsp;Marianna Adamo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas Severin MD ,&nbsp;Claudio Gimpelewicz MD ,&nbsp;Adriaan A. Voors MD, PhD ,&nbsp;John R. Teerlink MD ,&nbsp;Marco Metra MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.09.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The prognostic importance of residual congestion after acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalization is still debated.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The authors aimed to assess the impact of residual congestion in a large cohort of patients with AHF enrolled in the RELAX-AHF-2 (Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serelaxin When Added to Standard Therapy in AHF) trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Residual congestion was assessed at day 5 after admission among hospitalized patients using an established composite congestion score (CCS) based on the presence of orthopnea, peripheral edema, and increased jugular venous pressure, ranging from 0 to 8 points. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure or renal failure at 180 days.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 5,900 AHF patients included in this analysis, 3,380 (57.3%) had at least 1 sign of congestion (ie, CCS ≥1) and 1,066 (18.1%) had a CCS ≥3 at day 5 after admission. Patients with residual congestion at day 5 were more symptomatic, had more comorbidities, received higher doses of loop diuretic agents in-hospital, albeit with lower diuretic response, were less likely to have hemoconcentration, and were more likely to have worsening renal function at day 5. After multivariable adjustment for clinically meaningful variables, any sign of residual congestion and CCS ≥3 at day 5 were both independently associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint (adjusted HR: 1.32 [95% CI: 1.15-1.51]; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001 and adjusted HR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.39-1.88]; both <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among patients with AHF who were still hospitalized at day 5, residual congestion was common and independently associated with worse outcome. (Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serelaxin When Added to Standard Therapy in AHF [RELAX-AHF-2]; <span><span>NCT01870778</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 414-429"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142768939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical and Proteomic Risk Profiles of New-Onset Heart Failure in Men and Women 男性和女性新发心力衰竭的临床和蛋白质组学风险概况。
IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.09.022
Hailun Qin MD , Jasper Tromp MD, PhD , Jozine M. ter Maaten MD, PhD , Geert H.D. Voordes MD , Bart J. van Essen MD , Mark André de la Rambelje MSc , Camilla C.S. van der Hoef MD , Bernadet T. Santema MD, PhD , Carolyn S.P. Lam MD, PhD , Adriaan A. Voors MD, PhD

Background

Previous studies have examined clinical predictors of incident heart failure (HF) in men and women. However, potential mechanisms through which these clinical predictors relate to the onset of HF remain to be established.

Objectives

The authors studied the association between clinical and proteomic risk profiles of new-onset HF in men and women.

Methods

Incident HF was studied in 478,479 participants from the UK Biobank. The association between new-onset HF and 8 common modifiable traditional risk factors, including obesity, smoking status, socioeconomic status, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and history of myocardial infarction, was assessed in men and women. Proteomics data (2,923 unique proteins, Olink) was available in 22,695 men and 27,421 women. Pathway over-representation analyses were performed to identify biological pathways in men and women with and without new-onset HF. Principal component analyses were performed to extract weighted scores for each pathway. Subsequently, weighted scores were used in mediation analyses to investigate how the pathways mediated the association between risk factors and new-onset HF.

Results

During a median follow-up time of 12 years, HF incident rate was 3.60 per 1,000 person-years in men and 1.72 per 1,000 person-years in women (P < 0.001). The strongest risk factor for future HF was a history of myocardial infarction (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 2.46-2.77) in men and atrial fibrillation (HR: 4.10; 95% CI: 3.58-4.71) in women. When a risk factor was present in women, it conferred a higher risk of new-onset HF compared with the presence of the same risk factor in men. Both in men and women, the population-attributable risk was highest for hypertension (25% in men, 29% in women) and obesity (16% in men, 21% in women). Pathway analyses of protein profiles indicated several inflammatory pathways, and neutrophil degranulation in particular, to be activated both in men and women who developed HF. These inflammatory pathways modestly (22% in men and 24% in women) contributed to the association between hypertension and new-onset HF, but showed a stronger contribution (33% in men and 47% in women) to the association between obesity and new-onset HF.

Conclusions

In men and women, the most prominent risk factors for new-onset HF were hypertension and obesity, but they conferred a greater risk of new-onset HF in women. New-onset HF in both men and women was associated with pathophysiological pathways related to neutrophil degranulation and immunomodulation; and these pathways partly mediated the association between hypertension, obesity, and new-onset HF.
背景:以前的研究已经检查了男性和女性心力衰竭(HF)发生的临床预测因素。然而,这些临床预测因素与心衰发病相关的潜在机制仍有待确定。目的:作者研究了男性和女性新发心衰的临床和蛋白质组学风险谱之间的关系。方法:对来自UK Biobank的478,479名参与者的HF事件进行研究。在男性和女性中评估新发HF与8种常见可改变的传统危险因素之间的关系,包括肥胖、吸烟状况、社会经济状况、心房颤动、2型糖尿病、高血压、高脂血症和心肌梗死史。蛋白质组学数据(2923种独特的蛋白质,Olink)在22695名男性和27421名女性中可用。通路过度代表性分析用于确定有或无新发心衰的男性和女性的生物学通路。进行主成分分析以提取每个途径的加权分数。随后,加权评分用于中介分析,以调查这些途径如何介导危险因素与新发心衰之间的关联。结果:在中位随访12年期间,男性心衰发生率为3.60 / 1000人年,女性为1.72 / 1000人年(P < 0.001)。未来HF的最强危险因素是心肌梗死史(HR: 2.61;95% CI: 2.46-2.77)和房颤(HR: 4.10;95% CI: 3.58-4.71)。当危险因素存在于女性时,新发心衰的风险高于同样危险因素存在于男性的风险。在男性和女性中,人群归因风险最高的是高血压(男性25%,女性29%)和肥胖(男性16%,女性21%)。蛋白谱的通路分析表明,在男性和女性心衰患者中,几种炎症通路,特别是中性粒细胞脱颗粒,都被激活。这些炎症途径(男性22%,女性24%)对高血压和新发心衰之间的关联有一定贡献,但对肥胖和新发心衰之间的关联有更大的贡献(男性33%,女性47%)。结论:在男性和女性中,高血压和肥胖是新发HF最重要的危险因素,但它们在女性中赋予了更大的新发HF风险。男性和女性新发心衰与中性粒细胞脱颗粒和免疫调节相关的病理生理途径有关,这些途径部分介导了高血压、肥胖和新发心衰之间的关联。
{"title":"Clinical and Proteomic Risk Profiles of New-Onset Heart Failure in Men and Women","authors":"Hailun Qin MD ,&nbsp;Jasper Tromp MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jozine M. ter Maaten MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Geert H.D. Voordes MD ,&nbsp;Bart J. van Essen MD ,&nbsp;Mark André de la Rambelje MSc ,&nbsp;Camilla C.S. van der Hoef MD ,&nbsp;Bernadet T. Santema MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carolyn S.P. Lam MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Adriaan A. Voors MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.09.022","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.09.022","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous studies have examined clinical predictors of incident heart failure (HF) in men and women. However, potential mechanisms through which these clinical predictors relate to the onset of HF remain to be established.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The authors studied the association between clinical and proteomic risk profiles of new-onset HF in men and women.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Incident HF was studied in 478,479 participants from the UK Biobank. The association between new-onset HF and 8 common modifiable traditional risk factors, including obesity, smoking status, socioeconomic status, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and history of myocardial infarction, was assessed in men and women. Proteomics data (2,923 unique proteins, Olink) was available in 22,695 men and 27,421 women. Pathway over-representation analyses were performed to identify biological pathways in men and women with and without new-onset HF. Principal component analyses were performed to extract weighted scores for each pathway. Subsequently, weighted scores were used in mediation analyses to investigate how the pathways mediated the association between risk factors and new-onset HF.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During a median follow-up time of 12 years, HF incident rate was 3.60 per 1,000 person-years in men and 1.72 per 1,000 person-years in women (<em>P &lt;</em> 0.001). The strongest risk factor for future HF was a history of myocardial infarction (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 2.46-2.77) in men and atrial fibrillation (HR: 4.10; 95% CI: 3.58-4.71) in women. When a risk factor was present in women, it conferred a higher risk of new-onset HF compared with the presence of the same risk factor in men. Both in men and women, the population-attributable risk was highest for hypertension (25% in men, 29% in women) and obesity (16% in men, 21% in women). Pathway analyses of protein profiles indicated several inflammatory pathways, and neutrophil degranulation in particular, to be activated both in men and women who developed HF. These inflammatory pathways modestly (22% in men and 24% in women) contributed to the association between hypertension and new-onset HF, but showed a stronger contribution (33% in men and 47% in women) to the association between obesity and new-onset HF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In men and women, the most prominent risk factors for new-onset HF were hypertension and obesity, but they conferred a greater risk of new-onset HF in women. New-onset HF in both men and women was associated with pathophysiological pathways related to neutrophil degranulation and immunomodulation; and these pathways partly mediated the association between hypertension, obesity, and new-onset HF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 435-449"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142872111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Evaluation of New-Onset Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.12.003
Michelle Dimza DO, Cliff Pruett MD, Mark H. Drazner MD, MSc
{"title":"The Evaluation of New-Onset Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction","authors":"Michelle Dimza DO,&nbsp;Cliff Pruett MD,&nbsp;Mark H. Drazner MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 511-518"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143548039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Full issue PDF
IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-1779(25)00092-7
{"title":"Full issue PDF","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2213-1779(25)00092-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2213-1779(25)00092-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages I-CLIII"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143548311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of KDIGO-Defined CKD in U.S. Veterans With HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF
IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.007
Samir Patel MD , Venkatesh K. Raman MD , Charles Faselis MD , Gregg C. Fonarow MD , Phillip H. Lam MD , Amiya A. Ahmed MD , Paul A. Heidenreich MD, MS , Stefan D. Anker MD, PhD , Prakash Deedwania MD , Charity J. Morgan PhD , Sijian Zhang MB, MS , Hans Moore MD , Janani Rangaswami MD , George Bakris MD , Javed Butler MD, MPH, MBA , Helen M. Sheriff MD , Richard M. Allman MD , Qing Zeng-Treitler PhD , Wen-Chih Wu MD, MPH , Ali Ahmed MD, MPH

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined by the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guideline as abnormal kidney structure or function, present for >3 months, with implications for health. KDIGO-defined CKD is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Less is known about whether these associations vary by left ventricular ejection fraction.

Objectives

This study aims to determine the prevalence and outcomes of KDIGO-defined CKD in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods

Of the 1,446,053 veterans with an HF diagnosis (1991-2017) in the national Veterans Affairs electronic health record data, 365,000 with data on EF had KDIGO-defined CKD or normal kidney function (NKF). CKD was defined as 2 values measured 90 days apart of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (categorized into 4 eGFR stages based on the last eGFR: 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2, 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m2, 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2, and <15 mL/min/1.73 m2) or urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) >30 mg/g (albuminuria). NKF was defined as 2 values measured >90 days apart of eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, without eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or albuminuria for 3 years before HF diagnosis. Patients were categorized into HFpEF (EF ≥50%, n = 85,855), HFmrEF (EF 41%-49%, n = 39,397), and HFrEF (EF ≤40%, n = 139,748). HRs and 95% CIs for 5-year all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization through December 31, 2022, associated with the 5 CKD groups (vs NKF) were estimated using Cox regression.

Results

Among patients with HF and NKF, mortality occurred in 39%, 37%. and 41%, and HF hospitalization occurred in 12%, 15%, and 21% of those with HFpEF, HFmrEF. and HFrEF, respectively. Compared with NKF, CKD was associated with 16%, 19%, and 26% higher multivariable-adjusted risks for death in patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF, respectively. Respective risks for HF hospitalization were 31%, 33%, and 32% higher. The eGFR-associated risks were incrementally higher with decreasing eGFR, except for eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, likely because of the initiation of dialysis during follow-up. Albuminuria was associated with 16%, 10%, and 12% higher multivariable-adjusted risks for death and 29, 30%, and 24% for HF hospitalization in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF, respectively. All associations were statistically significant.

Conclusions

These findings based on KDIGO-defined CKD and NKF provide new information about the best estimates of true prevalence and outcomes of CKD in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF.
{"title":"Outcomes of KDIGO-Defined CKD in U.S. Veterans With HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF","authors":"Samir Patel MD ,&nbsp;Venkatesh K. Raman MD ,&nbsp;Charles Faselis MD ,&nbsp;Gregg C. Fonarow MD ,&nbsp;Phillip H. Lam MD ,&nbsp;Amiya A. Ahmed MD ,&nbsp;Paul A. Heidenreich MD, MS ,&nbsp;Stefan D. Anker MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Prakash Deedwania MD ,&nbsp;Charity J. Morgan PhD ,&nbsp;Sijian Zhang MB, MS ,&nbsp;Hans Moore MD ,&nbsp;Janani Rangaswami MD ,&nbsp;George Bakris MD ,&nbsp;Javed Butler MD, MPH, MBA ,&nbsp;Helen M. Sheriff MD ,&nbsp;Richard M. Allman MD ,&nbsp;Qing Zeng-Treitler PhD ,&nbsp;Wen-Chih Wu MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Ali Ahmed MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined by the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guideline as abnormal kidney structure or function, present for &gt;3 months, with implications for health. KDIGO-defined CKD is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Less is known about whether these associations vary by left ventricular ejection fraction.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to determine the prevalence and outcomes of KDIGO-defined CKD in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Of the 1,446,053 veterans with an HF diagnosis (1991-2017) in the national Veterans Affairs electronic health record data, 365,000 with data on EF had KDIGO-defined CKD or normal kidney function (NKF). CKD was defined as 2 values measured 90 days apart of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (categorized into 4 eGFR stages based on the last eGFR: 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and &lt;15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) or urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) &gt;30 mg/g (albuminuria). NKF was defined as 2 values measured &gt;90 days apart of eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, without eGFR &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> or albuminuria for 3 years before HF diagnosis. Patients were categorized into HFpEF (EF ≥50%, n = 85,855), HFmrEF (EF 41%-49%, n = 39,397), and HFrEF (EF ≤40%, n = 139,748). HRs and 95% CIs for 5-year all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization through December 31, 2022, associated with the 5 CKD groups (vs NKF) were estimated using Cox regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among patients with HF and NKF, mortality occurred in 39%, 37%. and 41%, and HF hospitalization occurred in 12%, 15%, and 21% of those with HFpEF, HFmrEF. and HFrEF, respectively. Compared with NKF, CKD was associated with 16%, 19%, and 26% higher multivariable-adjusted risks for death in patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF, respectively. Respective risks for HF hospitalization were 31%, 33%, and 32% higher. The eGFR-associated risks were incrementally higher with decreasing eGFR, except for eGFR &lt;15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, likely because of the initiation of dialysis during follow-up. Albuminuria was associated with 16%, 10%, and 12% higher multivariable-adjusted risks for death and 29, 30%, and 24% for HF hospitalization in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF, respectively. All associations were statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings based on KDIGO-defined CKD and NKF provide new information about the best estimates of true prevalence and outcomes of CKD in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 467-479"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heart Transplant and Pregnancy
IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.016
Vanessa Kirschner BS , Ophelia Yin MD , Lisa Coscia RN, BSN , Prisca C. Diala MD , Negeen Shahandeh MD , Roxanna A. Irani MD, PhD , Serban Constantinescu MD, PhD , Michael J. Moritz MD , Yalda Afshar MD, PhD

Background

Heart transplant recipients (HTRs) during pregnancy are at greater risk for maternal and obstetrical complications and hypertensive disease of pregnancy exacerbates these risks. The impact of preeclampsia on HTRs is unknown.

Objectives

The authors describe characteristics of HTRs who developed preeclampsia and the effect of preeclampsia on graft and pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

This is a retrospective group study of adult HTRs with subsequent pregnancy outcomes of ≥20 weeks’ gestation enrolled in the Transplant Pregnancy Registry International between 1986 and 2022. The primary outcome was graft loss within 2 years from delivery. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Results

A total of 146 pregnancies and 149 neonates met inclusion criteria. All were livebirths. Forty-two pregnancies (28.8%) were complicated by preeclampsia. HTRs in the preeclampsia group were more likely to be nulliparous (81.0% vs 54.8%; P < 0.01), and have chronic hypertension (73.8% vs 34.6%; P < 0.01). There was no difference in incidence of graft loss at 2 years with (4.8%) or without (2.9%) preeclampsia (P = 0.72). There was no clinically important difference in graft survival in pregnancies with preeclampsia compared with pregnancies without preeclampsia (adjusted HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.37-1.69]; P = 0.54). However, rates of severe maternal morbidity were high in both groups: 16.7% in the preeclampsia group and 10.6% in those without preeclampsia. Furthermore, preeclampsia was associated with earlier gestational age at birth (35.0 vs 37.0 weeks; P < 0.01) and lower birth weight (2,310 vs 2,801 grams; P < 0.01).

Conclusions

There was no difference in graft loss from delivery in HTRs who developed preeclampsia during pregnancy. Regardless of preeclampsia, pregnant HTRs are more likely than the general population to experience severe maternal morbidity. These findings provide pertinent information for counseling heart transplant recipients who pursue pregnancy.
{"title":"Heart Transplant and Pregnancy","authors":"Vanessa Kirschner BS ,&nbsp;Ophelia Yin MD ,&nbsp;Lisa Coscia RN, BSN ,&nbsp;Prisca C. Diala MD ,&nbsp;Negeen Shahandeh MD ,&nbsp;Roxanna A. Irani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Serban Constantinescu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Michael J. Moritz MD ,&nbsp;Yalda Afshar MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heart transplant recipients (HTRs) during pregnancy are at greater risk for maternal and obstetrical complications and hypertensive disease of pregnancy exacerbates these risks. The impact of preeclampsia on HTRs is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The authors describe characteristics of HTRs who developed preeclampsia and the effect of preeclampsia on graft and pregnancy outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective group study of adult HTRs with subsequent pregnancy outcomes of ≥20 weeks’ gestation enrolled in the Transplant Pregnancy Registry International between 1986 and 2022. The primary outcome was graft loss within 2 years from delivery. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 146 pregnancies and 149 neonates met inclusion criteria. All were livebirths. Forty-two pregnancies (28.8%) were complicated by preeclampsia. HTRs in the preeclampsia group were more likely to be nulliparous (81.0% vs 54.8%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and have chronic hypertension (73.8% vs 34.6%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). There was no difference in incidence of graft loss at 2 years with (4.8%) or without (2.9%) preeclampsia (<em>P =</em> 0.72). There was no clinically important difference in graft survival in pregnancies with preeclampsia compared with pregnancies without preeclampsia (adjusted HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.37-1.69]; <em>P =</em> 0.54). However, rates of severe maternal morbidity were high in both groups: 16.7% in the preeclampsia group and 10.6% in those without preeclampsia. Furthermore, preeclampsia was associated with earlier gestational age at birth (35.0 vs 37.0 weeks; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and lower birth weight (2,310 vs 2,801 grams; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was no difference in graft loss from delivery in HTRs who developed preeclampsia during pregnancy. Regardless of preeclampsia, pregnant HTRs are more likely than the general population to experience severe maternal morbidity. These findings provide pertinent information for counseling heart transplant recipients who pursue pregnancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14687,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Heart failure","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 498-507"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143548037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JACC. Heart failure
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1