JACC. Heart failure最新文献

Background: There is an unmet need for early detection of heart failure decompensation, allowing patients to be managed remotely and avoid hospitalization.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare a strategy utilizing data from a wearable HF sensor for management following a HF hospitalization to usual care.

Methods: Eligible subjects were discharged from the hospital within the previous 10 days and had a HF event in the previous 6 months. The concurrent control study was divided into 2 arms; a control arm, BMAD-HF and an open-label intervention arm, BMAD-TX. The HFMS (Heart Failure Monitoring System) was worn by subjects for up to 90 days. Device data was blinded to investigators and subjects in the BMAD-HF control arm but provided proactively in the BMAD-TX intervention arm. The impact of HF management with the HFMS was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to first HF hospitalization.

Results: A total of 522 subjects were enrolled in the study at 93 sites. A total of 245 subjects in BMAD-HF and 249 in BMAD-TX were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis. There were 276 hospitalizations in 189 subjects at 90 days, of which 108 events were determined to be heart failure related in 82 subjects. The subjects in the arm managed using HFMS data to direct HF therapy had a 38% lower HF hospitalization rate during the 90 days following a HF hospitalization compared to subjects in the control arm (HR = 0.62; P = 0.03).

Conclusions: In patients with a recent HF hospitalization, a strategy of using HFMS data for HF management is associated with a 38% relative risk reduction in 90-day HF rehospitalization. (Benefits of Microcor in Ambulatory Decompensated Heart Failure [BMAD-TX; NCT04096040] and Benefits of Microcor in Ambulatory Decompensated Heart Failure [BMAD-HF; NCT03476187]).

Background: For heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), suboptimal use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis), including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), due to hyperkalemia, may be improved by potassium binders.

Objectives: This prespecified analysis of the phase 3 DIAMOND (Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving RAASi Medications for the Treatment of Heart Failure) trial assessed the effect of patiromer in patients with HFrEF and either current or past hyperkalemia.

Methods: Patients with HFrEF and current or past (within 1 year before enrollment) hyperkalemia (serum potassium [sK⁺] >5.0 mmol/L) entered a single-blind, run-in phase to optimize RAASis while receiving patiromer. They were subsequently randomized, double-blind, to continue patiromer or change to placebo.

Results: Of the 1,038 patients who completed run-in, 354 (83.9%) of 422 with current hyperkalemia and 524 (85.1%) of 616 with past hyperkalemia achieved RAASi optimization and were randomized to treatment. During the double-blind phase, patiromer lowered sK⁺ levels compared with placebo in both the current and past hyperkalemia subgroups: difference in adjusted mean change from baseline: -0.12 (95% CI: -0.17 to -0.07) and -0.08 (95% CI: -0.12 to -0.05), respectively; P_interaction = 0.166. Patiromer was more effective than placebo in maintaining MRA at target dose in patients with current vs past hyperkalemia (HR: 0.45 [95% CI: 0.26-0.76] vs HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.54-1.32]; P_interaction = 0.031). Adverse events were similar between subgroups.

Conclusions: The use of patiromer facilitates achieving target doses of RAASis in patients with HFrEF with either current or past hyperkalemia. For those with current hyperkalemia before RAASi optimization, use of patiromer may be more beneficial in helping to maintain sK⁺ control and achieve MRA target dose. (Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving RAASi Medications for the Treatment of Heart Failure [DIAMOND]; NCT03888066).