首页 > 最新文献

JAMA surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Transfusion and Anemia in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery. 血管手术患者的输血与贫血。
IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2331
Michelle N Manesh, Alexander D DiBartolomeo, Helen A Potter, Fred A Weaver, Li Ding, Gregory A Magee
{"title":"Transfusion and Anemia in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery.","authors":"Michelle N Manesh, Alexander D DiBartolomeo, Helen A Potter, Fred A Weaver, Li Ding, Gregory A Magee","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2331","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2331","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11359097/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concerns About Recurrence Rate for Ventral Hernia Repair. 对腹股沟疝气修复术复发率的担忧。
IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2995
Anne P Ehlers, Alex K Hallway, Dana A Telem
{"title":"Concerns About Recurrence Rate for Ventral Hernia Repair.","authors":"Anne P Ehlers, Alex K Hallway, Dana A Telem","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2995","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Successful Prevention of Parastomal Hernia Formation With Intra-Abdominal Funnel-Shaped Mesh. 腹腔内漏斗状网片成功预防了腹股沟旁疝的形成。
IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3252
Imran J Anwar, Jacob A Greenberg
{"title":"Successful Prevention of Parastomal Hernia Formation With Intra-Abdominal Funnel-Shaped Mesh.","authors":"Imran J Anwar, Jacob A Greenberg","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3252","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concerns About Recurrence Rate for Ventral Hernia Repair-Reply. 对腹股沟疝气修复术复发率的担忧--回复。
IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2998
Priya Bhardwaj, Molly A Olson, Jeffrey E Janis
{"title":"Concerns About Recurrence Rate for Ventral Hernia Repair-Reply.","authors":"Priya Bhardwaj, Molly A Olson, Jeffrey E Janis","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2998","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2998","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Traumatic Brain Injury Transfers-Balancing Resources and Equity. 创伤性脑损伤转移--平衡资源与公平。
IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3251
Tanya L Zakrison, Toba Bolaji, Mihir J Chaudhary
{"title":"Traumatic Brain Injury Transfers-Balancing Resources and Equity.","authors":"Tanya L Zakrison, Toba Bolaji, Mihir J Chaudhary","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3251","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Transferred to Trauma Centers. 转至创伤中心的创伤性脑损伤患者的疗效。
IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3254
Sai Krishna Bhogadi, Collin Stewart, Hamidreza Hosseinpour, Adam Nelson, Michael Ditillo, Marc R Matthews, Louis J Magnotti, Bellal Joseph

Importance: Wide variations exist in traumatic brain injury (TBI) management strategies and transfer guidelines across the country.

Objective: To assess the outcomes of patients with TBI transferred to the American College of Surgeons (ACS) level I (LI) or level II (LII) trauma centers (TCs) on a nationwide scale.

Design, setting, and participants: In this secondary analysis of the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017 to 2020), adult patients with isolated TBI (nonhead abbreviated injury scale = 0) with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) who were transferred to LI/LII TCs we re included. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2020.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes were rates of head computed tomography scans, neurosurgical interventions (cerebral monitors, craniotomy/craniectomy), hospital length of stay, and mortality. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical mixed-model regression analyses were performed.

Results: Of 117 651 patients with TBI with ICH managed at LI/LII TCs 53 108; (45.1%; 95% CI, 44.8%-45.4%) transferred from other centers were identified. The mean (SD) age was 61 (22) years and 30 692 were male (58%). The median (IQR) Glasgow Coma Scale score on arrival was 15 (14-15); 5272 patients had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less on arrival at the receiving trauma center (10%). A total of 30 973 patients underwent head CT scans (58%) and 2144 underwent repeat head CT scans at the receiving TC (4%). There were 2124 patients who received cerebral monitors (4%), 6862 underwent craniotomy/craniectomy (13%), and 7487 received mechanical ventilation (14%). The median (IQR) hospital length of stay was 2 (1-5) days and the mortality rate was 6.5%. There were 9005 patients (17%) who were discharged within 24 hours and 19 421 (37%) who were discharged within 48 hours of admission without undergoing any neurosurgical intervention. Wide variations between and within trauma centers in terms of outcomes were observed in mixed-model analysis.

Conclusions: In this study, nearly half of the patients with TBI managed at LI/LII TCs were transferred from lower-level hospitals. Over one-third of these transferred patients were discharged within 48 hours without any interventions. These findings indicate the need for systemwide guidelines to improve health care resource use and guide triage of patients with TBI.

重要性:全国各地的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)管理策略和转院指南存在很大差异:评估全国范围内转入美国外科学院(ACS)一级(LI)或二级(LII)创伤中心(TC)的创伤性脑损伤患者的治疗效果:在这项对ACS创伤质量改进计划数据库(2017年至2020年)的二次分析中,我们纳入了转入LI/LII级创伤中心(TC)的伴有颅内出血(ICH)的孤立性创伤性脑损伤(非头部简略损伤量表=0)成人患者。数据分析时间为2017年1月1日至2020年12月31日:主要结果和测量指标:头部计算机断层扫描率、神经外科干预率(脑监测仪、开颅手术/颅骨切除术)、住院时间和死亡率。研究人员进行了描述性统计和分层混合模型回归分析:在117 651名在LI/LII TC接受治疗的TBI合并ICH患者中,有53 108人(45.1%;95% CI,44.8%-45.4%)是从其他中心转来的。平均(标清)年龄为61(22)岁,男性30 692人(58%)。到达时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的中位数(IQR)为15(14-15);5272名患者到达接收创伤中心时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为8分或以下(10%)。共有 30 973 名患者接受了头部 CT 扫描(58%),2144 名患者在接收创伤中心重复接受了头部 CT 扫描(4%)。有 2124 名患者接受了大脑监护仪(4%),6862 名患者接受了开颅/颅骨切除术(13%),7487 名患者接受了机械通气(14%)。住院时间中位数(IQR)为 2(1-5)天,死亡率为 6.5%。有 9005 名患者(17%)在入院 24 小时内出院,有 19 421 名患者(37%)在入院 48 小时内出院,未接受任何神经外科干预。在混合模型分析中观察到,不同创伤中心之间以及创伤中心内部的结果差异很大:在这项研究中,近一半在LI/LII TCs接受治疗的创伤性脑损伤患者是从下级医院转来的。超过三分之一的转院患者在 48 小时内出院,未采取任何干预措施。这些研究结果表明,有必要制定全系统指南,以改善医疗资源的使用并指导创伤性脑损伤患者的分流。
{"title":"Outcomes of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Transferred to Trauma Centers.","authors":"Sai Krishna Bhogadi, Collin Stewart, Hamidreza Hosseinpour, Adam Nelson, Michael Ditillo, Marc R Matthews, Louis J Magnotti, Bellal Joseph","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3254","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3254","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Wide variations exist in traumatic brain injury (TBI) management strategies and transfer guidelines across the country.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the outcomes of patients with TBI transferred to the American College of Surgeons (ACS) level I (LI) or level II (LII) trauma centers (TCs) on a nationwide scale.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this secondary analysis of the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017 to 2020), adult patients with isolated TBI (nonhead abbreviated injury scale = 0) with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) who were transferred to LI/LII TCs we re included. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2020.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Outcomes were rates of head computed tomography scans, neurosurgical interventions (cerebral monitors, craniotomy/craniectomy), hospital length of stay, and mortality. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical mixed-model regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 117 651 patients with TBI with ICH managed at LI/LII TCs 53 108; (45.1%; 95% CI, 44.8%-45.4%) transferred from other centers were identified. The mean (SD) age was 61 (22) years and 30 692 were male (58%). The median (IQR) Glasgow Coma Scale score on arrival was 15 (14-15); 5272 patients had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less on arrival at the receiving trauma center (10%). A total of 30 973 patients underwent head CT scans (58%) and 2144 underwent repeat head CT scans at the receiving TC (4%). There were 2124 patients who received cerebral monitors (4%), 6862 underwent craniotomy/craniectomy (13%), and 7487 received mechanical ventilation (14%). The median (IQR) hospital length of stay was 2 (1-5) days and the mortality rate was 6.5%. There were 9005 patients (17%) who were discharged within 24 hours and 19 421 (37%) who were discharged within 48 hours of admission without undergoing any neurosurgical intervention. Wide variations between and within trauma centers in terms of outcomes were observed in mixed-model analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, nearly half of the patients with TBI managed at LI/LII TCs were transferred from lower-level hospitals. Over one-third of these transferred patients were discharged within 48 hours without any interventions. These findings indicate the need for systemwide guidelines to improve health care resource use and guide triage of patients with TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11359096/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142080288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes in Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease. 有症状外周动脉疾病患者的生活质量和临床疗效
IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3094
Manasi Tannu, Jennifer A Rymer
{"title":"Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes in Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease.","authors":"Manasi Tannu, Jennifer A Rymer","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3094","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142017460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Restrictive Strategy vs Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Abdominal Pain and Gallstones: 5-Year Follow-Up of the SECURE Randomized Clinical Trial. 腹痛和胆结石患者胆囊切除术的限制性策略与常规护理:SECURE 随机临床试验的 5 年随访。
IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3080
Daan J Comes, Sarah Z Wennmacker, Carmen S S Latenstein, Jarmila van der Bilt, Otmar Buyne, Sandra C Donkervoort, Joos Heisterkamp, Klaas In't Hof, Jan Jansen, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs, Pascal Steenvoorde, Hein B A C Stockmann, Djamila Boerma, Joost P H Drenth, Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven, Marja A Boermeester, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Philip R de Reuver

Importance: The 1-year results of the SECURE trial, a randomized trial comparing a restrictive strategy vs usual care for select patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis for cholecystectomy, resulted in a significantly lower operation rate after restrictive strategy. However, a restrictive strategy did not result in more pain-free patients at 1 year.

Objective: To gauge pain level and determine the proportion of pain-free patients, operation rate, and biliary and surgical complications at the 5-year follow-up.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial was a multicenter, parallel-arm, noninferiority, prospective study. Between February 2014 and April 2017, patients from 24 hospitals with symptomatic, uncomplicated cholelithiasis were included. Uncomplicated cholelithiasis was defined as gallstone disease without signs of complicated cholelithiasis, ie, biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis, common bile duct stones, or cholecystitis. Follow-up data for this analysis were collected by telephone from July 11, 2019, to September 23, 2023.

Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive usual care or a restrictive strategy with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary, noninferiority end point was proportion of patients who were pain free as evaluated by Izbicki pain score at the 5-year follow-up. A 5% noninferiority margin was chosen. The secondary end points included cholecystectomy rates, biliary and surgical complications, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Among 1067 patients, the median (IQR) age was 49.0 years (38.0-59.0 years); 786 (73.7%) were female, and 281 (26.3%) were male. At the 5-year follow-up, 228 of 363 patients (62.8%) were pain free in the usual care group, compared with 216 of 353 patients (61.2%) in restrictive strategy group (difference, 1.6%; 1-sided 95% lower confidence limit, -7.6%; noninferiority P = .18). After cholecystectomy, 187 of 294 patients (63.6%) in the usual care group and 160 of 254 patients (63.0%) in the restrictive strategy group were pain free, respectively (P = .88). The restrictive care strategy was associated with 387 of 529 cholecystectomies (73.2%) compared with 437 of 536 in the usual care group (81.5%; 8.3% difference; P = .001). No differences between groups were observed in biliary and surgical complications or in patient satisfaction.

Conclusions and relevance: In the long-term, a restrictive strategy results in a significant but small reduction in operation rate compared with usual care and is not associated with increased biliary and surgical complications. However, regardless of the strategy, only two-third of patients were pain free. Further criteria for selecting patients with uncomplicated cholelithiasis for cholecystectomy and rethinking laparoscopic cholecystectomy as t

重要性:SECURE 试验是一项随机试验,比较了对有症状的胆石症患者进行胆囊切除术时的限制性策略和常规护理,结果显示,采用限制性策略后,手术率明显降低。然而,限制性策略并没有使更多患者在一年后无痛:测量疼痛程度,确定5年随访时无痛患者的比例、手术率、胆道和手术并发症:这项随机临床试验是一项多中心、平行臂、非劣效、前瞻性研究。2014年2月至2017年4月期间,来自24家医院的无症状、无并发症胆石症患者被纳入其中。无并发症胆石症是指没有并发症胆石症症状的胆石症,即胆源性胰腺炎、胆管炎、胆总管结石或胆囊炎。本次分析的随访数据是在2019年7月11日至2023年9月23日期间通过电话收集的:患者随机(1:1)接受常规护理或限制性策略,逐步选择胆囊切除术:主要非劣效性终点是随访 5 年时通过 Izbicki 疼痛评分评估的无痛患者比例。选择的非劣效边际为 5%。次要终点包括胆囊切除率、胆道和手术并发症以及患者满意度:在1067名患者中,中位(IQR)年龄为49.0岁(38.0-59.0岁);786人(73.7%)为女性,281人(26.3%)为男性。在 5 年随访中,常规护理组的 363 名患者中有 228 名(62.8%)无痛,而限制性策略组的 353 名患者中有 216 名(61.2%)无痛(差异为 1.6%;单侧 95% 置信下限为-7.6%;非劣效 P = .18)。胆囊切除术后,常规护理组 294 名患者中的 187 名(63.6%)和限制性策略组 254 名患者中的 160 名(63.0%)分别无痛(P = .88)。在 529 例胆囊切除术中,采用限制性护理策略的有 387 例(73.2%),而在常规护理组的 536 例胆囊切除术中,采用限制性护理策略的有 437 例(81.5%;相差 8.3%;P = .001)。在胆道并发症和手术并发症以及患者满意度方面,各组之间未发现差异:从长期来看,与常规护理相比,限制性策略可显著降低手术率,但降低幅度较小,且与胆道和手术并发症的增加无关。然而,无论采用哪种策略,只有三分之二的患者能够摆脱疼痛。为改善患者报告的结果,需要进一步制定标准,选择无并发症胆石症患者进行胆囊切除术,并重新思考腹腔镜胆囊切除术的治疗方法:试验注册:CCMO Identifier:NTR4022.
{"title":"Restrictive Strategy vs Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Abdominal Pain and Gallstones: 5-Year Follow-Up of the SECURE Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Daan J Comes, Sarah Z Wennmacker, Carmen S S Latenstein, Jarmila van der Bilt, Otmar Buyne, Sandra C Donkervoort, Joos Heisterkamp, Klaas In't Hof, Jan Jansen, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs, Pascal Steenvoorde, Hein B A C Stockmann, Djamila Boerma, Joost P H Drenth, Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven, Marja A Boermeester, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Philip R de Reuver","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3080","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The 1-year results of the SECURE trial, a randomized trial comparing a restrictive strategy vs usual care for select patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis for cholecystectomy, resulted in a significantly lower operation rate after restrictive strategy. However, a restrictive strategy did not result in more pain-free patients at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To gauge pain level and determine the proportion of pain-free patients, operation rate, and biliary and surgical complications at the 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was a multicenter, parallel-arm, noninferiority, prospective study. Between February 2014 and April 2017, patients from 24 hospitals with symptomatic, uncomplicated cholelithiasis were included. Uncomplicated cholelithiasis was defined as gallstone disease without signs of complicated cholelithiasis, ie, biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis, common bile duct stones, or cholecystitis. Follow-up data for this analysis were collected by telephone from July 11, 2019, to September 23, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive usual care or a restrictive strategy with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary, noninferiority end point was proportion of patients who were pain free as evaluated by Izbicki pain score at the 5-year follow-up. A 5% noninferiority margin was chosen. The secondary end points included cholecystectomy rates, biliary and surgical complications, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1067 patients, the median (IQR) age was 49.0 years (38.0-59.0 years); 786 (73.7%) were female, and 281 (26.3%) were male. At the 5-year follow-up, 228 of 363 patients (62.8%) were pain free in the usual care group, compared with 216 of 353 patients (61.2%) in restrictive strategy group (difference, 1.6%; 1-sided 95% lower confidence limit, -7.6%; noninferiority P = .18). After cholecystectomy, 187 of 294 patients (63.6%) in the usual care group and 160 of 254 patients (63.0%) in the restrictive strategy group were pain free, respectively (P = .88). The restrictive care strategy was associated with 387 of 529 cholecystectomies (73.2%) compared with 437 of 536 in the usual care group (81.5%; 8.3% difference; P = .001). No differences between groups were observed in biliary and surgical complications or in patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In the long-term, a restrictive strategy results in a significant but small reduction in operation rate compared with usual care and is not associated with increased biliary and surgical complications. However, regardless of the strategy, only two-third of patients were pain free. Further criteria for selecting patients with uncomplicated cholelithiasis for cholecystectomy and rethinking laparoscopic cholecystectomy as t","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339699/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142017422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High Fresh Frozen Plasma to Red Blood Cell Ratio and Survival Outcomes in Blunt Trauma. 新鲜冷冻血浆与红细胞的高比率与钝性创伤患者的生存结果
IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3097
Gaku Fujiwara, Yohei Okada, Wataru Ishii, Tadashi Echigo, Naoto Shiomi, Shigeru Ohtsuru

Importance: Current trauma-care protocols advocate early administration of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in a ratio close to 1:1 with red blood cells (RBCs) to manage trauma-induced coagulopathy in patients with severe blunt trauma. However, the benefits of a higher FFP to RBC ratio have not yet been established.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a high FFP to RBC transfusion ratio in the treatment of severe blunt trauma and explore the nonlinear relationship between the ratio of blood products used and patient outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a multicenter cohort study retrospectively analyzing data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank, including adult patients with severe blunt trauma without severe head injury (Injury Severity Score ≥16 and head Abbreviated Injury Scale <3) between 2019 and 2022.

Exposures: Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on the ratio of FFP to RBC: the high-FFP group (ratio >1) and the low-FFP group (ratio ≤1).

Main outcomes and measures: All-cause in-hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Additionally, the occurrence of transfusion-related adverse events was evaluated.

Results: Among the 1954 patients (median [IQR] age, 61 [41-77] years; 1243 male [63.6%]) analyzed, 976 (49.9%) had a high FFP to RBC ratio. Results from logistic regression, weighted by inverse probability treatment weighting, demonstrated an association between the group with a high-FFP ratio and lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.93) compared with a low-FFP ratio. Nonlinear trends were noted, suggesting a potential ceiling effect on transfusion benefits.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, a high FFP to RBC ratio was associated with favorable survival in patients with severe blunt trauma. These outcomes highlight the importance of revising the current transfusion protocols to incorporate a high FFP to RBC ratio, warranting further research on optimal patient treatment.

重要性:目前的创伤护理方案主张尽早使用新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP),与红细胞(RBC)的比例接近 1:1,以控制严重钝性创伤患者因创伤引起的凝血功能障碍。然而,提高 FFP 与红细胞比例的益处尚未得到证实:研究高FFP与RBC输血比例在治疗严重钝性创伤中的有效性,并探索血液制品使用比例与患者预后之间的非线性关系:这是一项多中心队列研究,对日本创伤数据库的数据进行回顾性分析,研究对象包括严重钝性创伤但无严重头部损伤(损伤严重程度评分≥16分,头部简略损伤量表暴露)的成年患者:根据FFP与RBC的比例将患者分为两组:高FFP组(比例>1)和低FFP组(比例≤1):主要结果和测量指标:主要结果是全因住院死亡率。此外,还评估了输血相关不良事件的发生率:在分析的1954名患者(中位数[IQR]年龄,61[41-77]岁;1243名男性[63.6%])中,976名患者(49.9%)的FFP与RBC比率较高。通过反概率治疗加权的逻辑回归结果显示,与低 FFP 比率相比,高 FFP 比率组与较低的院内死亡率之间存在关联(几率比 0.73;95% CI,0.56-0.93)。非线性趋势表明输血效益可能存在上限效应:在这项队列研究中,FFP与RBC的高比率与严重钝性创伤患者的良好存活率相关。这些结果凸显了修订现行输血方案以纳入高 FFP 与 RBC 比值的重要性,因此有必要对患者的最佳治疗方法进行进一步研究。
{"title":"High Fresh Frozen Plasma to Red Blood Cell Ratio and Survival Outcomes in Blunt Trauma.","authors":"Gaku Fujiwara, Yohei Okada, Wataru Ishii, Tadashi Echigo, Naoto Shiomi, Shigeru Ohtsuru","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3097","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Current trauma-care protocols advocate early administration of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in a ratio close to 1:1 with red blood cells (RBCs) to manage trauma-induced coagulopathy in patients with severe blunt trauma. However, the benefits of a higher FFP to RBC ratio have not yet been established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of a high FFP to RBC transfusion ratio in the treatment of severe blunt trauma and explore the nonlinear relationship between the ratio of blood products used and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a multicenter cohort study retrospectively analyzing data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank, including adult patients with severe blunt trauma without severe head injury (Injury Severity Score ≥16 and head Abbreviated Injury Scale <3) between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on the ratio of FFP to RBC: the high-FFP group (ratio >1) and the low-FFP group (ratio ≤1).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>All-cause in-hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Additionally, the occurrence of transfusion-related adverse events was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1954 patients (median [IQR] age, 61 [41-77] years; 1243 male [63.6%]) analyzed, 976 (49.9%) had a high FFP to RBC ratio. Results from logistic regression, weighted by inverse probability treatment weighting, demonstrated an association between the group with a high-FFP ratio and lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.93) compared with a low-FFP ratio. Nonlinear trends were noted, suggesting a potential ceiling effect on transfusion benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, a high FFP to RBC ratio was associated with favorable survival in patients with severe blunt trauma. These outcomes highlight the importance of revising the current transfusion protocols to incorporate a high FFP to RBC ratio, warranting further research on optimal patient treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339704/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142017459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fresh Frozen Plasma to Red Blood Cell Ratios and Survival Benefit. 新鲜冷冻血浆与红细胞的比率与生存益处
IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3110
Jason L Sperry, Christine M Leeper, Joshua Brown
{"title":"Fresh Frozen Plasma to Red Blood Cell Ratios and Survival Benefit.","authors":"Jason L Sperry, Christine M Leeper, Joshua Brown","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3110","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142017458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JAMA surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1