JCO precision oncology最新文献

Purpose: Urinary catecholamine metabolites are well-known biomarkers for the diagnosis (Dx) of neuroblastoma, but their clinical significance in determining therapy response during treatment is not well established. Therefore, catecholamines are not included in criteria for assessing response and complete remission (CR). This study investigated the use of urinary catecholamines in response monitoring and predicting survival outcomes.

Methods: From 2005 to 2021, a panel of eight urinary catecholamines were measured in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma at Dx and at standard evaluation moments during treatment. At the same time points, response and CR were assessed according to the revised International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria.

Results: The total cohort consists of 153 high-risk patients, and at least one of the eight metabolites was elevated (ie, catecholamine status positive) in 141 of 146 (97%), 104 of 128 (81%), and 39 of 69 (57%) patients at Dx, postinduction, and at CR, respectively. Primary tumor resection significantly reduced catecholamine levels (P < .01). A positive catecholamine status at Dx, during treatment, and at the end of treatment was not significantly associated with event-free survival (EFS) or overall survival (OS). However, in patients who achieved CR, those with a positive catecholamine status had poor EFS (38% v 80%, respectively; P < .01) and OS (52% v 86%, respectively; P = .01) compared with those with a negative catecholamine status. Notably, 3-methoxytyramine levels at CR seem to be a prognostic marker for poor OS (hazard ratio, 7.5 [95% CI, 2.0 to 28.6]).

Conclusion: Catecholamine measurements contribute to the assessment of CR and identifies patients with high-risk neuroblastoma with an increased risk of relapse and death.

Purpose: Although germline genetic testing (GT) is recommended for all patients with ovarian cancer (OC) and some patients with endometrial cancer (EC), uptake remains low with multiple barriers. Our center performs GT in parallel with somatic testing via a targeted sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT) and initiates testing in oncology clinics (mainstreaming). We sought to optimize our GT processes for OC/EC.

Methods: We performed a quality improvement study to evaluate our GT processes within gynecologic surgery/medical oncology clinics. All eligible patients with newly diagnosed OC/EC were identified for GT and tracked in a REDCap database. Clinical data and GT rates were collected by the study team, who reviewed data for qualitative themes.

Results: From February 2023 to April 2023, we identified 116 patients with newly diagnosed OC (n = 57) and EC (n = 59). Patients were mostly White (62%); English was the preferred language for 90%. GT was performed in 52 (91%) patients with OC (seven external, 45 MSK-IMPACT) and in 44 (75%) patients with EC (three external, 41 MSK-IMPACT). GT results were available within 3 months for 100% and 95% of patients with OC and EC, respectively. Reasons for not undergoing GT included being missed by the clinical team where there was no record that GT was recommended, feeling overwhelmed, financial and privacy concerns, and language barriers. In qualitative review, we found that resources were concentrated in the initial visit with little follow-up to encourage GT at subsequent points of care.

Conclusion: A mainstreaming approach that couples somatic and germline GT resulted in high testing rates in OC/EC; however, barriers were identified. Processes that encourage GT at multiple care points and allow self-directed, multilingual digital consenting should be piloted.

Purpose: The NCI-MATCH study is a tumor-agnostic platform trial enrolling patients to targeted therapies on the basis of genomic alterations. Subprotocol V investigated sunitinib in patients with tumors harboring c-KIT mutations.

Methods: EAY131-V, is an open-label, single-arm, phase II study. Eligible patients had malignancies containing somatic c-KIT mutation on exons 9, 11, 13, or 14. Exclusions were mutations on exons 17 and 18, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, renal cell carcinoma, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Patients received sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks with 2-week rest per cycle, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, PFS, overall survival, and toxicities.

Results: Between November 1, 2016, and May 21, 2020, 10 patients were enrolled and nine were eligible and started treatment. The median age was 62 years (range, 30-76), 77.8% received two previous lines of systemic therapy, and 22.2% received >3 lines. The most common histology was melanoma (44%) and then squamous cell carcinoma of the lung or thymus (33%). There were two partial responses with an ORR of 22.2% (90% CI, 4.1 to 55) and stable disease in 44%. All patients demonstrated tumor shrinkage of target lesions. The estimated 6-month PFS was 33.3% (90% CI, 15.4 to 72.4). Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred in five patients (55.6%). This arm was closed in 2022 on the basis of low accrual. Prevalence of eligible c-KIT mutations after screening 5,540 patients was 0.45%.

Conclusion: Sunitinib for c-KIT mutations did not meet the primary end point, but in this small sample size, a potential signal cannot be ruled out. Rate of eligible c-KIT mutations was low, affecting accrual to this arm.

Purpose: Aberrant expression of nectin-4 (N4) has been observed in several malignancies emerging as new target for antibody-drug conjugates, especially in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UBC). Limited data on N4 positivity in nonurothelial genitourinary (GU) cancers are available. This systematic-review aimed to investigate N4 positivity among GU malignancies.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed on March 2023 using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Protocol was amended to incorporate a new updated search on March 2024.

Results: Twenty-five studies evaluating N4 positivity in GU tumors were included, 14 on UBC, three on upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), six on histologic subtypes (HS) and divergent histology of the bladder, one on papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), one in chromophobe RCC (chRCC), two on penile cancer, one in prostate cancer (PCa). Among UBC, stratifying per stage N4 positivity was higher in metastatic (weighted mean [WM], 90.8; range, 59.6-100) and in non-muscle-invasive (WM, 87.4; range, 86.7-88.3) than in muscle-invasive UC (WM, 83.1; range, 68.2-100). The N4 positivity of UBC was higher than UTUC (WM, 62.9; range, 44.4-65.7). Immunohistochemistry N4 positivity was reported to be lower in non-UC malignancies, including pRCC (WM, 44.1; range, 44.1-44.1), HS (WM, 63.5; range, 0-100), PCa (WM0; range, 0-0), chRCC (WM, 18.5; range, 18.5-18.5), and penile cancer (WM, 86.5; range, 61.4-98.3), compared with UBC overall (WM, 87.1; range, 59.6-100).

Conclusion: Non-UC malignancies seem to have a lower N4 positivity rate than UC. N4 positivity in bladder cancer appears to vary according to stage and presence of HS. The predictive and prognostic role of N4 must be further characterized in larger and prospective studies.

Purpose: Malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) are rare fibroepithelial tumors of the breast with aggressive biologic behavior and high recurrence rates. Surgery remains the primary treatment modality for these tumors; however, initial investigations suggest a potential for targeted therapies in managing this disease. Therefore, we aimed to assess the molecular landscape of MPTs to reveal possible treatment opportunities.

Methods: MPTs (n = 57) from primary and metastatic sites underwent genomic sequencing (592-gene panel or whole exome), whole-transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry (PD-L1, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Immune cell fractions in the tumor microenvironment were estimated using quanTIseq. Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine significance (P < .05).

Results: MPTs had low ERBB2 expression, comparable with the HER2-negative subset of a large cohort of breast adenocarcinoma samples (N = 9,926). Frequent alterations included TERT promoter; MED12, TP53, and NF1 mutations; and less frequently EGFR, PIK3CA, and BRAF. Differences in mutation prevalences were observed between primary sites, lung metastases, and nonlung metastases. One MPT specimen harbored a pathogenic TPM4:NTRK1 fusion, and treatment with larotrectinib for over 16 months suggested a clinical response to therapy. PD-L1+ status was observed in 15.2% of MPTs overall, with similar prevalence in primary sites and lung metastases. B cells, M2 macrophages, neutrophils, and natural killer cells had the highest median cell fractions in MPTs.

Conclusion: Considering the occurrence of several actionable alterations including a TPM4:NTRK1 fusion reported herein, these results support the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) including RNA analysis for fusion detection to identify such alterations in patients with MPTs. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive NGS in MPT research to uncover potential targeted treatment options for these patients.

Purpose: Genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly used to improve diagnoses and inform targeted therapies. GS can also be used to identify the 10% of cancer patients with an underlying hereditary cancer syndrome (HCS), who can benefit from surveillance and preventive surgery that reduce morbidity/mortality. However, the evidence on clinical utility of GS for HCS is limited: we aimed to fill this gap by assessing yield of all cancer results and associated recommendations for patients undergoing GS for HCS.

Materials and methods: An observational chart review and survey were conducted for cancer patients with previous uninformative cancer gene panel results, who received GS as part of the Incidental Genomics Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03597165). Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographics and clinical history. Proportions were calculated to compare frequencies of result types and recommendations made and followed.

Results: A total of 276 patients were eligible and included. Participants were mostly female (n = 240), European (n = 158), and with breast cancer history (n = 168). Yield: 25 patients (9.1%) received ≥1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant, 246 (89%) received ≥1 variant of uncertain significance (VUS), and 27 (10%) were negative. Most pathogenic variants (20/26) were in low/moderate cancer risk genes. The mean number of VUS was 2.7/patient and higher in non-Europeans versus Europeans (3.5 v 2.5, P < .05). Recommendations: Pathogenic variants triggered 100 recommendations in 21/25 patients; most were for genetic counseling, communication to relatives, and cascade testing.

Conclusion: GS provided a modest increase in utility after first-tier cancer gene panels, at the cost of a high frequency of uncertain results. Furthermore, most positives were low/moderate cancer risk results that did not have corresponding evidence-based, management guidelines.

Purpose: Patients with tumors harboring BRAF class 3 mutations lack targeted therapies. These mutations are characterized by low/absent BRAF kinase domain activation and are believed to amplify already active RAS signaling, potentially triggered by receptor tyrosine kinases like EGFR.

Materials and methods: Two patients with BRAF class 3-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with erlotinib at our Institution after failure of standard therapies. Two cell lines were established from patients with BRAF class 3-mutated NSCLC, and their sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) was assessed using EGFR-mutated, BRAF class 1 and 2-mutated, and KRAS-mutated NSCLC cell lines as controls.

Results: Patient 1, a 60-year-old male with BRAF^D594N-mutated NSCLC, achieved complete response to erlotinib after progression on first- and second-line chemotherapy. Patient 2, a 60-year-old female with BRAF^D594G-mutated NSCLC, achieved partial response to erlotinib after progression on first-line chemoimmunotherapy. High baseline phosphorylated EGFR values and reduced EGFR activation following erlotinib were observed in BRAF class 3-mutated and EGFR-mutated cell lines, but not in BRAF class 1-mutated, BRAF class 2-mutated, or KRAS-mutated lines. Erlotinib inhibited 2-dimensional growth in BRAF class 3-mutated cell lines (IC₅₀ 6.33 and 7.11 µM) and in the BRAF class 2-mutated cell line (IC₅₀ 5.51 µM), albeit at higher concentrations than in EGFR-mutated lines, whereas it showed no effect on BRAF class 1-mutated (IC₅₀, >25 µM) or KRAS-mutated (IC₅₀, >25 µM) lines. These findings were corroborated by 3-dimensional and sphere formation assays. In the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, BRAF class 3-mutated NSCLC cell lines showed greater sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs compared with BRAF class 2-mutated and KRAS-mutated lines.

Conclusion: BRAF class 3 mutations in NSCLC may identify a novel targetable population sensitive to EGFR-TKIs.

Purpose: Several tumor gene mutations are known for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The individual response to 177-lutetium prostate specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (Lu-PSMA) is under current investigation regarding the genomic profile of patients with mCRPC.

Materials and methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of patients with mCRPC with breast cancer-related antigen (BRCA) or tumor suppressor gene mutations (TP53, PTEN, RB1). Specifically, subgroup analyses were performed for patients with Lu-PSMA-treated mCRPC.

Results: Of 194 patients with mCRPC, 22% was BRCA1/2 versus 14% PTEN/TP53/RB1 versus 63% without one of these mutations. Patients with no mutation harbored a significantly lower Gleason score of 8-10, relative to BRCA and PTEN/TP53/RB1 patients. In PFS analyses of first-line mCRPC, no difference between all three groups was observed, whereas the median OS differed significantly with 46.3 versus 48.7 versus 95.4 months for BRCA versus PTEN/TP53/RB1 versus no mutated patients (P < .05). In univariable Cox regression models, BRCA-mutated patients were at higher risk of death (hazard ratio, 2.57; P < .01), whereas PTEN/TP53/RB1 patients were not (P = .4). Of 87 patients with Lu-PSMA-treated mCRPC, significant differences in PFS and OS were observed (both P ≤ .02). In univariable and multivariable Cox regression models, BRCA-mutated Lu-PSMA patients were at higher risk of death, whereas PTEN/TP53/RB1 patients had similar outcomes as no mutated patients.

Conclusion: In real-world setting, substantially lower OS in mCRPC is observed for BRCA- and PTEN/TP53/RB1-mutated patients, whereas no difference in first-line PFS could be computed. In Lu-PSMA-treated patients, worst outcomes were observed for BRCA patients.