JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute最新文献

Background: Despite the wide use of a 3-month gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for ovarian function suppression in premenopausal breast cancer patients, it remains unclear whether it is as effective and safe as a 1-month GnRH agonist regimen when combined with selective estrogen receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitors, especially in younger patients.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1109 premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with GnRH agonist plus selective estrogen receptor modulator or aromatase inhibitor. The estradiol (E2) inhibition rate within 1-24 months after treatment with 1-month or 3-month GnRH agonist in cohorts and different subgroups was analyzed.

Results: Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 950 patients with a mean age of 39 years and a median follow-up of 46 months were included. Both the 1-month and 3-month groups achieved more than 90% E2 inhibition within 24 months (94.53% vs 92.84%, with a 95% confidence interval for the difference ranging from -4.78% to 1.41%), confirming the noninferiority of 3-month GnRH agonist. Both 1-month and 3-month GnRH agonist rapidly and consistently reduced E2 levels. Of the patients, 60 (6.3%) experienced incomplete ovarian function suppression, with similar rates in the 1-month and 3-month groups (5.5% vs 7.2%). Incomplete ovarian function suppression mainly occurred within the first 12 months, with age younger than 40 years and no prior chemotherapy being the risk factors. Similar disease-free survival and overall survival were found in the 1-month and 3-month groups and in patients with complete and incomplete ovarian function suppression (P > .05).

Conclusions: The ovarian function suppression with 3-month GnRH agonist was not inferior to that with 1-month GnRH agonist, regardless of age or combination with a selective estrogen receptor modulator or an aromatase inhibitor.

The National Institutes of Health-US Food and Drug Administration Joint Leadership Council Next-Generation Sequencing and Radiomics Working Group was formed by the National Institutes of Health-Food and Drug Administration Joint Leadership Council to promote the development and validation of innovative next-generation sequencing tests, radiomic tools, and associated data analysis and interpretation enhanced by artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies. A 2-day workshop was held on September 29-30, 2021, to convene members of the scientific community to discuss how to overcome the "ground truth" gap that has frequently been acknowledged as 1 of the limiting factors impeding high-quality research, development, validation, and regulatory science in these fields. This report provides a summary of the resource gaps identified by the working group and attendees, highlights existing resources and the ways they can potentially be employed to accelerate growth in these fields, and presents opportunities to support next-generation sequencing and radiomic tool development and validation using technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning.

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) among individuals younger than age 50 (early-onset CRC [EOCRC]) has substantially increased, and yet the etiology and molecular mechanisms underlying this alarming rise remain unclear. We compared tumor-associated T-cell repertoires between EOCRC and average-onset CRC (AOCRC) to uncover potentially unique immune microenvironment-related features by age of onset. Our discovery cohort included 242 patients who underwent surgical resection at Cleveland Clinic from 2000 to 2020. EOCRC was defined as younger than age 50 years at diagnosis (N = 126) and AOCRC as 60 years of age or older (N = 116). T-cell receptor (TCR) abundance and clonality were measured by immunosequencing of tumors. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations between TCR repertoire features and age of onset, adjusting for sex, race, tumor location, and stage. Findings were replicated in 152 EOCRC and 1984 AOCRC cases from the Molecular Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Study. EOCRC tumors had significantly higher TCR diversity compared with AOCRC tumors in the discovery cohort (odds ratio [OR] = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32 to 0.61, P < .0001). This association was also observed in the replication cohort (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.89, P = .0013). No significant differences in TCR abundance were observed between EOCRC and AOCRC in either cohort. Higher TCR diversity, suggesting a more diverse intratumoral T-cell response, is more frequently observed in EOCRC than AOCRC. Further studies are warranted to investigate the role of T-cell diversity and the adaptive immune response more broadly in the etiology and outcomes of EOCRC.

Background: Children living in poverty and those of marginalized race or ethnicity experience inferior disease outcomes across many cancers. Whether survival disparities exist in osteosarcoma is poorly defined. We investigated the association between race, ethnicity, and proxied poverty exposures and event-free and overall survival for children with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma receiving care on a cooperative group trial.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US patients with nonmetastatic, osteosarcoma aged 5-21 years enrolled on the Children's Oncology Group trial AOST0331. Race and ethnicity were categorized to reflect historically marginalized populations, as Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Other, and non-Hispanic White. Poverty was proxied at the household and neighborhood levels. Overall survival and event-free survival functions of time from trial enrollment were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hypotheses of associations between risks for event-free survival, death, and postrelapse death with race and ethnicity were assessed using log-rank tests.

Results: Among 758 patients, 25.6% were household-poverty and 28.5% neighborhood-poverty exposed. Of the patients, 21% of children identified as Hispanic, 15.4% non-Hispanic Black, 5.3% non-Hispanic Other, and 54.0% non-Hispanic White. Neither household or neighborhood poverty nor race and ethnicity were statistically significantly associated with risks for event-free survival or death. Postrelapse risk for death differed statistically significantly across race and ethnicity with non-Hispanic Black patients at greatest risk (4-year postrelapse survival 35.7% Hispanic vs 13.0% non-Hispanic Black vs 43.8% non-Hispanic Other vs 38.9% non-Hispanic White; P = .0046).

Conclusions: Neither proxied poverty exposures or race and ethnicity were associated with event-free survival or overall survival, suggesting equitable outcomes following frontline osteosarcoma trial-delivered therapy. Non-Hispanic Black children experienced statistically significant inferior postrelapse survival. Investigation of mechanisms underlying postrelapse disparities are paramount.

Background: Relatively little is known about the differences in prognostic factors for early vs late recurrence among women with early stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Methods: We analyzed factors related to early (<5 years) vs late (≥5 years) recurrence in 2992 women with stage I-IIB estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in the Pathways Study, a prospective cohort of women with breast cancer enrolled between 2006 and 2013, with ascertainment of recurrence and death through December 2021.

Results: After a median follow-up of 13.3 years, 341 (13.8%) women had recurrences, including 181 (53.7%) with late recurrence. Higher stage and grade were associated with recurrence regardless of timing, whereas progesterone receptor negativity was associated with early but not late recurrence. Receipt of endocrine therapy was associated with reduced risk of overall recurrence, but the length of endocrine therapy was not statistically significant in multivariable models. Minoritized racial and ethnic groups, including Asian, Black, and Hispanic women, had higher risk of early but not late recurrence compared to non-Hispanic White women. The trend of higher risk of early recurrence among these groups remained after adjustment for clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic factors but was statistically significant only in Asian women.

Conclusions: Our study revealed potentially important distinctions for early vs late recurrence, including the associations with progesterone receptor negativity and self-identified race and ethnicity. Possible higher risk of early recurrence among Asian, Black, and Hispanic women provides novel evidence for the existence of disparities in cancer outcomes, even within the breast cancer subtype indicative of generally good prognosis.

Background: In KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488), neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and then adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved pathological complete response and event-free survival vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYNOTE-522.

Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks, plus 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin and then 4 cycles of doxorubicin (or epirubicin) plus cyclophosphamide. After surgery, patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo for up to 9 cycles. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC Breast Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23) were prespecified secondary objectives. Between-group differences in least squares (LS) mean change from baseline (day 1 of cycle 1 in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases) to the prespecified latest time point with at least 60% completion and at least 80% compliance were assessed using a longitudinal model (no alpha error assigned).

Results: Week 21 (neoadjuvant phase) and week 24 (adjuvant phase) were the latest time points at which completion/compliance rates were ≥60%/80%. In the neoadjuvant phase, between-group differences (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy [n = 762] vs placebo plus chemotherapy [n = 383]) in LS mean change from baseline to week 21 in QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), emotional functioning, and physical functioning were -1.04 (95% confidence interval = -3.46 to 1.38), -0.69 (95% CI = -3.13 to 1.75), and -2.85 (95% CI = -5.11 to -0.60), respectively. In the adjuvant phase, between-group differences (pembrolizumab [n = 539] vs placebo [n = 308]) in LS mean change from baseline to week 24 were -0.41 (95% CI = -2.60 to 1.77), -0.60 (95% CI = -2.99 to 1.79), and -1.57 (95% CI = -3.36 to 0.21).

Conclusions: No substantial differences in PRO assessments were observed between neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab vs neoadjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036488.

Prostate cancer (PC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with far more diagnoses than deaths annually. Recent discussions have challenged whether Grade Group 1 (GG1) PC should be labeled "cancer" due to its indolent nature. To address this question, an international symposium convened stakeholders from various fields. We summarize key discussion points: autopsy studies reveal GG1 is so common in aging males as to be perhaps a normal aspect of aging. Pure GG1 has no capacity to metastasize. Modern diagnostic pathways focus on detecting higher-grade disease, explicitly omitting biopsy if GG 2 or higher is not suspected, so GG1 has effectively become an "incidentaloma." Recent spatial transcriptomics of prostate sections identifies a continuum of genomic changes-including alterations characteristic of malignancy in histologically normal regions, so the designation of cancer based entirely on conventional pathology findings increasingly seems arbitrary at least to an extent. Pathologists discussed heterogeneity and diagnostic challenges, suggesting "acinar neoplasm" as one possible alternative label. GG1 should not be considered "normal," and absolutely requires ongoing active surveillance; whether patients would adhere to surveillance absent a cancer diagnosis is unknown. Patient perspectives highlighted the adverse effects of overtreatment and the burden of a cancer diagnosis. The anticipated impact on screening and treatment varies across health-care systems, but many believe public health would on balance greatly improve if GG1-along with lesions in other organs with no capacity to cause symptoms or threaten life-were labeled something other than "cancer." Ultimately, our goal is to reduce PC mortality while minimizing harms associated with both overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Background: Little is known about the role of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and their interaction with vitamin D status in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis.

Methods: We evaluated the association of TaqI, BsmI, Cdx-2, and ApaI polymorphisms, individually and in combination, with liver cancer-specific (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) among 967 patients with newly diagnosed HCC. Subsequently, we examined whether these polymorphisms modified the association between serum bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations and survival. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: During a median follow-up of 1017 days, 393 deaths occurred, with 360 attributed to HCC. Having TaqI G allele (HRper allele = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.57) or BsmI T allele (HRper allele = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.99) was associated with worse LCSS. Carrying increasing numbers of protective alleles was associated with superior LCSS (HR6-8 vs 0-3 = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.80). The inverse association of bioavailable 25OHD with LCSS was statistically significant only in patients with TaqI AA (HRQuartile 4 vs Quartile 1 = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.92), BsmI CC (HRQuartile 4 vs Quartile 1 = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.88), and 6 to 8 protective alleles (HRQuartile 4 vs Quartile 1 = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.87). Similar associations were observed for OS.

Conclusions: Patients carrying wild-type TaqI, BsmI, or more protective alleles had improved survival and might benefit from optimizing bioavailable 25OHD status.