JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute最新文献

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have profoundly impacted survival among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. However, population-based studies evaluating this impact on survival by race and socioeconomic factors are lacking.

Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare database to identify patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed between 2015 and 2019. The primary study outcomes were the receipt of an immune checkpoint inhibitor and overall survival. χ2 tests and logistic regression were used to identify demographic factors associated with receipt of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate 2-year overall survival rates, and log-rank tests were used to compare survival by race and ethnicity.

Results: Of 17 134 patients, approximately 39% received an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Those diagnosed with cancer recently (in 2019); who are relatively younger (aged younger than 85 years); non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Asian, or Hispanic; living in high socioeconomic status or metropolitan areas; not Medicaid eligible; and with adenocarcinoma histology were more likely to receive immune checkpoint inhibitors. The 2-year overall survival rate from diagnosis was 21% for the overall population. The 2-year overall survival rate from immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation was 30%, among those who received at least 1 cycle and 11% among those who did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors. The 2-year overall survival rates were higher among non-Hispanic White (22%) and non-Hispanic Asian (23%) patients compared with non-Hispanic Black (15%) and Hispanic (17%) patients. There was no statistically significant racial differences in survival for those who received immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Conclusion: Immune checkpoint inhibitor utilization rates and the resulting outcomes were inferior for certain vulnerable groups, mandating the need for strategies to improve access to care.

Deep learning (DL)-based algorithms to determine prostate cancer (PCa) Grade Group (GG) on biopsy slides have not been validated by comparison to clinical outcomes. We used a DL-based algorithm, AIRAProstate, to regrade initial prostate biopsies in 2 independent PCa active surveillance (AS) cohorts. In a cohort initially diagnosed with GG1 PCa using only systematic biopsies (n = 138), upgrading of the initial biopsy to ≥GG2 by AIRAProstate was associated with rapid or extreme grade reclassification on AS (odds ratio = 3.3, P = .04), whereas upgrading of the initial biopsy by contemporary uropathologist reviews was not associated with this outcome. In a contemporary validation cohort that underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy (n = 169), upgrading of the initial biopsy (all contemporary GG1 by uropathologist grading) by AIRAProstate was associated with grade reclassification on AS (hazard ratio = 1.7, P = .03). These results demonstrate the utility of a DL-based grading algorithm in PCa risk stratification for AS.

Background: The role of Th17 cells in prostate cancer is not fully understood. The transcription factor BATF controls the differentiation of Th17 cells. Mice deficient in Batf do not produce Th17 cells.

Methods: In this study, we aimed to characterize the role of Batf-dependent Th17 cells in prostate cancer by crossbreeding Batf knockout mice with mice conditionally mutant for Pten.

Results: We found that Batf knockout mice had changes in the morphology of prostate epithelial cells compared with normal mice, and Batf knockout mice deficient in Pten (called Batf-) had smaller prostate size and developed fewer invasive prostate adenocarcinomas than Pten-deficient mice with Batf expression (called Batf+). The prostate tumors in Batf- mice showed reduced proliferation, increased apoptosis, decreased angiogenesis and inflammatory cell infiltration, and activation of nuclear factor-κB signaling. Moreover, Batf- mice showed significantly reduced interleukin 23 (IL-23)-IL-23R signaling. In the prostate stroma of Batf- mice, IL-23R-positive cells were decreased considerably compared with Batf+ mice. Splenocytes and prostate tissues from Batf- mice cultured under Th17 differentiation conditions expressed reduced IL-23/IL-23R than cultured cells from Batf+ mice. Anti-IL-23p19 antibody treatment of Pten-deficient mice reduced prostate tumors and angiogenesis compared with control immunoglobulin G-treated mice. In human prostate tumors, BATF messenger RNA level was positively correlated with IL-23A and IL-23R but not RORC.

Conclusion: Our novel findings underscore the crucial role of IL-23-IL-23R signaling in mediating the function of Batf-dependent Th17 cells, thereby promoting prostate cancer initiation and progression. This finding highlights the BATF-IL-23R axis as a promising target for the development of innovative strategies for prostate cancer prevention and treatment.

Introduction: Programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)-directed immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas the optimal therapeutic combinations remain uncertain.

Methods: Our study encompassed phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved anti-PD-(L)1-based therapies for stage-IV NSCLC. The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and incidences of adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted by treatment lines, PD-L1 expression levels, histological types, and metastatic sites.

Results: Our analysis incorporated 38 publications, covering 14 therapeutic combinations and involving 18 048 participants. PD-(L)1+chemotherapy (CT), PD-(L)1+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) +CT, and PD-(L)1+ T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain were notably effective in prolonging OS. Overall, PD-(L)1+CT and PD-(L)1+CT+ vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were significantly beneficial for PFS and ORR. As for the subsequent-line treatments, incorporating radiotherapy can enhance PFS and ORR (ranked fourth among enrolled treatments). For patients with PD-L1 <1%, PD-(L)1+CT+VEGF and PD-(L)1+CTLA4+CT were favorable approaches. Conversely, in patients with PD-L1 ≥50%, PD-(L)1+CT represented an effective treatment. Patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma or liver metastases might benefit from the addition of VEGF. In cases of squamous cell carcinoma or brain metastases, the combination of PD-(L)1+CTLA4+CT yielded superior benefits.

Conclusions: This study underscores the enhanced efficacy of combination immunotherapies over monotherapy. It highlights the necessity for personalized treatment, considering individual factors. These insights are vital for clinical decision making in the management of advanced NSCLC.

Background: Blood-based biomarker tests can potentially change the landscape of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We characterize the conditions under which blood test screening would be as effective and cost-effective as annual fecal immunochemical testing or decennial colonoscopy.

Methods: We used the 3 Cancer Information and Surveillance Modeling Network-Colon models to compare scenarios of no screening, annual fecal immunochemical testing, decennial colonoscopy, and a blood test meeting Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) coverage criteria (74% CRC sensitivity and 90% specificity). We varied the sensitivity to detect CRC (74%-92%), advanced adenomas (10%-50%), screening interval (1-3 years), and test cost ($25-$500). Primary outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained from screening and costs for a US average-risk cohort of individuals aged 45 years.

Results: Annual fecal immunochemical testing yielded 125-163 QALY gained per 1000 at a cost of $3811-$5384 per person, whereas colonoscopy yielded 132-177 QALY gained at a cost of $5375-$7031 per person. A blood test with 92% CRC sensitivity and 50% advanced adenoma sensitivity yielded 117-162 QALY gained if used every 3 years and 133-173 QALY gained if used every year but would not be cost-effective if priced above $125 per test. If used every 3 years, a $500 blood test only meeting CMS coverage criteria yielded 83-116 QALY gained at a cost of $8559-$9413 per person.

Conclusion: Blood tests that only meet CMS coverage requirements should not be recommended to patients who would otherwise undergo screening by colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical testing because of lower benefit. Blood tests need higher advanced adenoma sensitivity (above 40%) and lower costs (below $125) to be cost-effective.

With the escalating prevalence of obesity, the association between obesity and cancer is a growing public health concern. Obesity will soon surpass tobacco smoking as the most important preventable cause of cancer. Obesity-driven mechanisms can alter cell functions to induce metabolic changes, chronic inflammation, and insulin resistance that are believed to contribute to cancer risk and development; yet the specific underlying biological mechanisms of obesity-related cancer development are largely unknown. The Metabolic Dysregulation and Cancer Risk Program: a transdisciplinary approach to obesity-associated cancers (MeDOC) is a trans-National Cancer Institute research initiative supported by the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, the Division of Cancer Biology, the Division of Cancer Prevention, and the Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities. The overall purpose of the MeDOC Program is to advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms that connect obesity, metabolic dysregulation, and increased obesity cancer risk as well as identify markers that will enhance cancer risk prediction, improve screening for high-risk individuals, and identify targets for preventive and therapeutic interventions for cancer interception or treatment. This report describes the funded research projects, the Coordinating Center, and the goals of the MeDOC program.

The requirement of community outreach and engagement (COE) as a major component of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grant has had an enormous impact on the way NCI-designated cancer centers identify, investigate, and address the needs of their catchment area (CA) communities. Given the wide-ranging diversity of our nation, COE's scope of work (SOW) is extremely demanding and complex. Yet, COE is often marginalized and viewed as void of scientific methods when, in fact, it requires specialized scientific knowledge and a broad range of proficiencies. Black COE scientific directors may be particularly attuned to this marginalization as they have often confronted workplace inequities that resemble the health inequities observed within their cancer center's CA. Thus, Black COE leaders are uniquely positioned to offer insight on the past, present, and future of COE. Key areas discussed include the low involvement of minoritized group members and those with appropriate expertise in national COE leadership; the lack of established, consistent criteria for evaluation of COE components and qualifications of evaluators; the need for substantial financial investment in COE; potential misalignment of community priorities and cancer center objectives; professional development and growth of COE staff and leaders; the expanding scope of COE across their respective cancer centers and CAs; and the need for center-wide involvement in COE and an "all-hands-on-deck" approach. These areas warrant thoughtful dialogue as COE evolves, for the benefit and success of all COE leaders. However, this dialogue must include diverse voices representing similarly diverse stakeholders at every level.