Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology最新文献

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) with MWA alone in treating liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC).

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 251 patients with unresectable and not to chemotherapy responding LMCRC were included. Group A consisted of 184 patients (104 male and 80 females; mean age: 64 ± 11.4 years) with 442 metastases who received a combination of TACE and MWA. A total of 67 patients (49 male and 18 females; mean age: 63.2 ± 11.8 years) with 173 metastases patients were included in group B, who received only MWA. Parameters assessed were local tumor progression (LTP), hepatic distant tumor progression (hDTP), hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: The rate of LTP was 4.9% in group A and 4.5% in group B (p-value: 0.062). The rate of hDTP was 71.7% and 83.6% for groups A and B (p-value: 0.81), respectively. The mean hPFS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.9-16.8) for group A and 8.1 months (95% CI 6.1-10.1) for group B (p-value: 0.03). The median OS time for group A was 30 months (95% CI 26-34), with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 84.2%, 61.1%, 40.8% and 31.3%, respectively. In group B however, the median OS time was 26 months (95% CI 18-34) with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 82.3%, 53.2%, 34.6% and 28.2%, respectively (p-value: 0.67).

Conclusion: The combination therapy of TACE and MWA is superior to the monotherapy of MWA for LMCRC, especially regarding hDTP, hPFS and OS.

Background: Glioma stands as the most prevalent primary brain tumor found within the central nervous system, characterized by high invasiveness and treatment resistance. Although immunotherapy has shown potential in various tumors, it still faces challenges in gliomas. This study seeks to develop and validate a prognostic model for glioma based on immune-related genes, to provide new tools for precision medicine.

Methods: Glioma samples were obtained from a database that includes the ImmPort database. Additionally, we incorporated ten machine learning algorithms to assess the model's performance using evaluation metrics like the Harrell concordance index (C-index). The model genes were further studied using GSCA, TISCH2, and HPA databases to understand their role in glioma pathology at the genomic, molecular, and single-cell levels, and validate the biological function of IKBKE in vitro experiments.

Results: In this study, a total of 199 genes associated with prognosis were identified using univariate Cox analysis. Subsequently, a consensus prognostic model was developed through the application of machine learning algorithms. In which the Lasso + plsRcox algorithm demonstrated the best predictive performance. The model showed a good ability to distinguish two groups in both the training and test sets. Additionally, the model genes were closely related to immunity (oligodendrocytes and macrophages), and mutation burden. The results of in vitro experiments showed that the expression level of the IKBKE gene had a significant effect on the apoptosis and migration of GL261 glioma cells. Western blot analysis showed that down-regulation of IKBKE resulted in increased expression of pro-apoptotic protein Bax and decreased expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, which was consistent with increased apoptosis rate. On the contrary, IKBKE overexpression caused a decrease in Bax expression an increase in Bcl-2 expression, and a decrease in apoptosis rate. Tunel results further confirmed that down-regulation of IKBKE promoted apoptosis, while overexpression of IKBKE reduced apoptosis. In addition, cells with down-regulated IKBKE had reduced migration in scratch experiments, while cells with overexpression of IKBKE had increased migration.

Conclusion: This study successfully constructed a glioma prognosis model based on immune-related genes. These findings provide new perspectives for glioma prognosis assessment and immunotherapy.

Background: Preclinical models of pancreatic cancer (PDAC) suggest a synergistic role for combined MEK and autophagy signaling inhibition, as well as MEK and CDK4/6 pathway targeting. Several case reports implicate clinical activity of the combination of either trametinib and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with KRAS-mutant PDAC or trametinib with CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with KRAS and CDKN2A/B alterations. However, prospective data from clinical trials is lacking. Here, we aim to provide clinical evidence regarding the use of these experimental regimens in the setting of dedicated precision oncology programs.

Methods: In this retrospective case series, PDAC patients who received either trametinib/HCQ (THCQ) or trametinib/palbociclib (TP) were retrospectively identified across 11 participating cancer centers in Germany.

Results: Overall, 34 patients were identified. 19 patients received THCQ, and 15 received TP, respectively. In patients treated with THCQ, the median duration of treatment was 46 days, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 52 days and median overall survival (OS) was 68 days. In the THCQ subgroup, all patients evaluable for response (13/19) had progressive disease (PD) within 100 days. In the TP subgroup, the median duration of treatment was 60 days, median PFS was 56 days and median OS was 195 days. In the TP subgroup, 9/15 patients were evaluable for response, of which 1/9 showed a partial response (PR) while 8/9 had PD. One patient achieved a clinical benefit despite progression under TP.

Conclusion: THCQ and TP are not effective in patients with advanced PDAC harboring KRAS mutations or alterations in MAPK/CDKN2A/B.

In the era of next-generation sequencing, the genetic background of cancer, including melanoma, appears to be thoroughly established. However, evaluating the oncogene BRAF mutation in codon V600 is still the only companion diagnostic genomic test commonly implemented in clinics for molecularly targeted treatment of advanced melanoma. Are we wasting the collected genomic data? Will we implement our current genomic knowledge of melanoma in clinics soon? This question is rather urgent because new therapeutic targets and biomarkers are needed to implement more personalized, patient-tailored therapy in clinics. Here, we provide an update on the molecular background of melanoma, including a description of four already established molecular subtypes: BRAF+, NRAS+, NF1+, and triple WT, as well as relatively new NGS-derived melanoma genes such as PREX2, ERBB4, PPP6C, FBXW7, PIK3CA, and IDH1. We also present a comparison of genomic profiles obtained in recent years with a focus on the most common melanoma genes. Finally, we propose our melanoma gene panel consisting of 22 genes that, in our opinion, are "must-have" genes in both melanoma-specific genomic tests and pan-cancer tests established to improve the treatment of melanoma further.

Background: Fibroepithelial lesions (FEL) are a heterogeneous group of biphasic tumours that include fibroadenomas (FA) and the rare entity of benign phyllodes tumors (PT) as well as cases where distinction between these two entities is not possible. The histologic distinction between benign PT and cellular FA is still a diagnostic challenge, especially in core-needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). Guidelines are not clearly established regarding the management of FEL in CNB or VAB. In this study, we addressed the frequency of B3 FEL diagnosed in CNB or VAB and compared the final histopathological findings in the excision specimens to evaluate up- or downgrading.

Methods: We identified 117 female patients with the preoperative diagnosis of FEL (B3), PT, or FEL in combination of pure epithelial B3 lesions in CNB or VAB. Clinico-pathological information as well as data on subsequent surgical excision were available for all patients.

Results: PT was diagnosed in 9 (14.8%) and FEL (B3) in 52 (85.2%) cases. Additionally, 56 patients with FA in combination with an additional B3 lesion were identified. Most FEL (B3)/PT initial diagnoses were made in CNB (55.6% of PT; 84.6% of FEL). After the initial biopsy, 7 of 9 (77.8%) patients with initial diagnosis of benign or borderline PT in CNB/VAB and 40 of 52 (77.0%) patients with initial diagnosis of FEL (B3) in CNB/VAB underwent open excision (OE). 4 of 9 cases (44.4%) initially diagnosed as PT were verified, whereas 2 of 9 (22.2%) were downgraded to FA. 20 of 52 cases (38.5%) initially diagnosed as FEL (B3) were downgraded to FA, whereas 11 of 52 cases (21.2%) were diagnosed as benign or borderline PT. One FEL (B3) case was upgraded to malignant PT.

Conclusion: Most PT and FEL (B3) diagnoses on CNB/VAB underwent surgical removal. In the final pathological findings of cases classified primarily as FEL (B3), the majority were downgraded to FA, one quarter were upgraded to PT, and a small subset remained as combined FA/PT. In clinical daily practice, we recommend individualized decision-making considering different options (clinical follow-up or removal of the lesion depending on the whole context) in a multidisciplinary preoperative conference.

Background: Extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) is a rare solitary malignancy that accounts for 3% of plasma cell neoplasms, and EMP with a primary occurrence in the palate is extremely uncommon. Owing to the long course of EMP and the limited available data on treatment outcomes, there are no definitive guidelines for its management, especially for high-risk patients who are more susceptible to early progression to multiple myeloma.

Case presentation: In this study, we review nine relevant studies and describe a 54-year-old woman who presented with an asymptomatic nonulcerative mass localized in the palate. After initial radical surgical resection of the lesion, the patient was definitively diagnosed with EMP with minimal plasmacytosis in the bone marrow, and adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a minimum dose of 39.6 Gy was administrated in the surgical area. There was no evidence of local recurrence, nodal metastasis or progression to multiple myeloma (MM) during the seven-year follow-up period.

Conclusion: Given the atypical clinical features of palate EMP reported in the literature and the encouraging results of our patient, sequential therapy involving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for primary palatal lesions in high-risk EMP patients without nodal involvement could be an effective treatment modality.

Purpose: Little is known about the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on glioblastoma (GBM) growth, metabolism, and prognosis. Immunological changes within GBM tissue are potentially symptomatic, underlining the urgent need for a better understanding of this phenomenon. To date, the complex underlying biology has not been fully elucidated. A decisive role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the components of the immune system acting within it is assumed.

Methods: Immunohistochemical staining of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and immune cell infiltration of TME was performed on the tumor tissue of one patient. This patient developed hemiparesis 14 days after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, leading to tumor diagnosis. Subsequently and after biopsy, there was an unexpectedly good response to chemotherapy only. In looking for further evidence of the potential of SARS-CoV-2 to influence the course of GBM, two additional adult patients that had transient MRI changes and neurological deterioration following SARS-CoV-2 infection were evaluated.

Results: In the patient for whom neurological deterioration in the course of SARS-CoV-2 led to GBM diagnosis, immunohistochemistry revealed virus-specific protein accumulation in the tumor cells, microglial activation, and the formation of T-cell nodules. In the other two patients, the findings were compatible with symptomatic pseudoprogression that occurred in a temporal relationship with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Conclusion: The results indicate a possible association between clinically relevant changes in GBM biology and SARS-CoV-2 infection, with histological confirmation of SARS-CoV-2-associated changes within the tumor tissue. The exact pathomechanism and underlying inflammatory pathways require further investigation.

Purpose: The rarity of cerebellar glioblastoma presents a significant challenge in clinical practice due to the lack of extensive prognostic data on long-term survival rates, rendering it an underrepresented entity compared to its supratentorial counterpart. This study aims to analyze potential differences in survival outcome between patients with cerebellar and supratentorial glioblastomas.

Methods: From 2009 to 2020, 8 patients underwent surgical treatment for cerebellar glioblastoma at the authors' institution. These patients were individually matched with a cohort of 205 consecutive patients from our institutional database with supratentorial glioblastoma, taking into account key prognostic parameters. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared. Additionally, we performed a systematic literature review to compile further survival data on cerebellar glioblastoma patients.

Results: The median OS for cerebellar glioblastoma patients was 18 months (95% CI 11-25). The balanced matched-pair analysis showed no significant difference in survival when compared to patients with supratentorial glioblastoma, exhibiting a median OS of 23 months (95% CI 0-62) (p = 0.63). Respective values for PFS were 8 months (95% CI 4-12) for cerebellar and 7 months (95% CI 0-16) for supratentorial glioblastoma (p = 0.2). The systematic review revealed that median OS for cerebellar glioblastoma in current literature ranges from 7 to 21 months.

Conclusions: The present findings indicate that patients with supra- and infratentorial glioblastoma do not significantly differ in regard to survival outcome parameters. This similarity in prognosis might encourage clinicians to consider surgical interventions for both supra- and infratentorial glioblastoma in a similar manner.

Purpose: The evaluation of treatment success and progression in oncology patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is playing an increasingly important role. Meanwhile, PROs are a component of the certification requirements of the German Cancer Society for oncology centers. PROs are used to provide supportive therapy. There is currently no instrument that fully covers the requirements. At the University Hospital Regensburg (UKR), a digital ONCOlogical-ROUTinE-Screening (ONCO-ROUTES) procedure was developed in order to assess the need for supportive therapy in a standardized way and to provide patients with supportive interventions tailored to their needs.

Methods: On the basis of current requirements and guidelines, the development of ONCO-ROUTES was supported by experts in focus groups and interviews, and digitalization was carried out in connection with the IT infrastructure.

Results: A Needs-based, Quality-of-life (QoL) and Symptoms Screening (NQS²) tool already established in the routine at the UKR was further developed into ONCO-ROUTES, which is made up of the domains therapy phase, nutrition, tobacco use, alcohol use, quality of life, general condition/functional status, physical activity, psychooncology, social services, and further support needs. By linking the digitized questionnaire to the hospital information system, the results are available for immediate use in routine operations and thus for the referral of patients for further supportive therapy.

Conclusion: The digital PRO application ONCO-ROUTES is designed to involve patients in monitoring additional supportive needs and thus, improves supportive interdisciplinary treatment.

Purpose: Pancreatic cancer remains a significant public health challenge, with poor long-term outcomes due to the lack of effective treatment options. Repurposing commonly used clinical drugs, such as ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCBs, and metformin, may enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy and offer a promising therapeutic strategy for improving patient outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of concomitant treatment with ACE-Is, ARBs, CCBs, and metformin alongside gemcitabine chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer was conducted. Treatment responses were evaluated, with overall survival (OS) estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, the Cox proportional hazards model was employed to assess the impact of these specific agents on patient survival.

Results: 4628 patients with various stages of pancreatic cancer were identified in the database between 2007 and 2016. The estimated overall survival (OS) in the analyzed group was 6.9 months (95% CI 6.4-7). The use of any of the analyzed drugs was associated with a significant improvement in mOS of 7.5 months (95% CI 6.8-7.8) vs. 6.7 months (95% CI 6.4-7.0) for patients who did not have additional treatment (p < 0.0001). ARBs, ACE-Is, CCBs, and metformin varied in their effectiveness in prolonging mOS among patients. The longest mOS of 8.9 months (95% CI 7.7-11.6) was observed in patients receiving additional therapy with ARBs, while the shortest mOS of 7.7 months (95% CI 6.5-8.9) was achieved by patients receiving metformin. In the adjusted Cox analysis, metformin was associated with a significantly weaker effect on mOS (p = 0.029). A particularly interesting trend in prolonging 5-year survival was demonstrated by ARBs and CCBs with 14.1% (95% CI 9-22%) and 14.8% (95% CI 11.1-19.6%), respectively, compared to patients not taking these drugs, who achieved a 5-year OS of 3.8% (95% CI 3.2-4.4%).

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate a significant positive impact of ARBs, ACE inhibitors, and CCBs on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine. The addition of these inexpensive and relatively safe drugs in patients with additional comorbidities may represent a potential therapeutic option in this indication. However, prospective clinical trials to evaluate the optimal patient population and further studies to determine the potential impact of these agents on chemotherapy are necessary.