Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention最新文献

Purpose: The World Health Organization has recommended breaking up sitting time to improve cardiovascular health. However, whether isometric exercise can be effectively used as a strategy to break up sitting time remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the acute effects of breaking up prolonged sitting with isometric wall squat exercise (IWSE) on vascular function and blood pressure (BP) in sedentary adults.

Methods: This randomized crossover trial included 17 adults (53% male, 26 ± 6 yr, 22.4 ± 3.6 kg/m 2 ) with high sedentary behavior (≥ 6 hr/d). The participants completed 2 experimental sessions in a randomized order, both sharing a common sitting period of 180 min: Breaks (2-min breaks were incorporated into the IWSE, with participants maintaining their knees at the angle determined by the incremental test, which occurred every 30 min) and Control (sitting for 180 min continuously). Popliteal artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and brachial BP were measured before and at 10 and 30 min after the experimental sessions.

Results: The results did not indicate significant session vs time interaction effects on popliteal FMD and brachial BP ( P > .05). A subanalysis including only participants with popliteal FMD reduction after the Control session (n = 11) revealed that Breaks enhanced popliteal FMD after 10 min (1.38 ± 6.45% vs -4.87 ± 2.95%, P = .002) and 30 min (-0.43 ± 2.48% vs -2.11 ± 5.22%, P = .047).

Conclusion: Breaking up prolonged sitting with IWSE mitigates impaired vascular function resulting from prolonged sitting but has no effect on BP in sedentary adults.

Purpose: Labor market participation is an important rehabilitation goal for working-age patients living with heart failure (HF). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and HF hospitalizations and improves quality of life, but no studies have investigated labor market participation following CRT. We therefore aimed to describe labor market participation in patients with HF before and after CRT implantation.

Methods: This region-wide register-based cohort study comprised patients with HF aged 40 to 63 yr, with ejection fraction ≤35% and QRS duration >130 milliseconds, who received a CRT system from 2000 to 2017 in the Central Denmark Region. Using unambiguous, individual-level linkage in Danish medical and administrative registries, we assessed weekly employment status from 1 yr prior to CRT implantation until 2 to 5 yr of follow-up and conducted stratified analyses by sociodemographic and disease-related risk factors.

Results: We identified 546 patients, of whom 42% were in early retirement 1 yr prior to implantation. Active employment decreased from 45% to 19% from 1 yr before until implantation, declining primarily in the last 8 wk before implantation. The proportion of patients in active employment increased in the first 8 wk after CRT implantation and then stabilized, reaching 31% at 1-yr follow-up. We observed lower labor market participation in patients with older age, multimorbidity, lower educational level, and upgrade procedures, but higher in later calendar year.

Conclusions: In working-age patients with HF, labor market participation increased after CRT implantation, despite many patients being retired prior to implantation. We observed differences in active employment related to several sociodemographic and disease-related factors.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore functional improvements by sex for patients with refractory angina pectoris using a 6-min walk test (6MWT) after enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy.

Methods: All patients who completed EECP from 2015 to 2023 were identified for analysis retrospectively, utilizing the electronic medical record. Patients completed 35 1-hr EECP sessions 5 d/wk over 7 wk. All baseline and post-EECP intervention 6MWT, exertional angina, and dyspnea measurements were assessed on the first and last sessions, respectively. Paired and unpaired t tests and linear and stepwise multivariable regression analyses were performed.

Results: The cohort consisted of 116 patients (24 female) with a mean age of 69 ± 13 yr. After EECP, there was a mean improvement of 128 m (72%) in distance walked during the 6MWT ( P < .001) with 126 ± 91 m improvement in males and 134 ± 73 m in females. The improvement in angina and dyspnea scores was 3.5 ± 2.1 and 4.2 ± 2.4, respectively. There were no differences between the sexes for improvements in 6MWT distance, angina, or dyspnea. Univariate associations for change in 6MWT distance included body mass index (BMI; adjusted R2  = .05) and being a nonsmoker (adjusted R2  = .03). The only independent predictor for increasing distance during 6MWT was BMI (adjusted R2  = .1; P = .001).

Conclusion: Patients who have refractory angina pectoris can improve their functional capacity while simultaneously decreasing exertional angina and dyspnea using EECP. This study highlights the equal efficacy of EECP therapy for females.

Purpose: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) affects the cardiovascular system even after the acute phase of the disease. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation may improve post-COVID-19 symptoms. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program after acute COVID-19 on arterial stiffness, left ventricular function, and ventriculoarterial coupling (VAC).

Methods: Forty-eight adults were examined 1 (T0) and 3-mo (T1) following recovery from COVID-19 and randomized 1:1 to participate or not in a 3-mo rehabilitation program. Matched subjects were enrolled as a non-COVID-19 group. Arterial stiffness was evaluated by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). Left ventricular (LV) systolic performance was evaluated with global longitudinal strain (GLS). The PWV/LV-GLS ratio was calculated as an index of VAC. High-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) was measured.

Results: At T0, convalescent patients with COVID-19 had impaired PWV ( P = .001) and reduced VAC ( P = .001) compared to non-COVID-19 subjects. PWV (8.15 ± 1.37 to 6.55 ± 0.98 m/sec, P < .001) and LV-GLS (-19.67 ± 1.98 to -21.3 ± 1.93%, P < .001) improved only in convalescent patients with COVID-19 undergoing rehabilitation. Similarly, VAC was only improved in the rehabilitation group (-0.42 ± 0.11 to -0.31 ± 0.06 m · sec -1  ·% -1 , P < .001). A significant improvement in VO 2max was noted after rehabilitation (15.70 [13.05, 21.45] to 18.30 [13.95, 23.75] ml · kg -1  · min -1 , P = .01). Finally, hs-CRP was improved in both groups with a significantly greater improvement in the rehabilitation group.

Conclusion: A 3-mo rehabilitation program in convalesced patients with COVID-19 enhances the recovery of arterial stiffness, left ventricular function, and VAC, highlighting the beneficial mechanisms of rehabilitation in this patient population.

Purpose: Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has emerged as a potential intervention to improve respiratory outcomes for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, the extent of the IMT effects on preoperative and postoperative respiratory metrics remains uncertain. Hence, we designed this study to determine the effects of IMT on various outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies evaluating the impact of preoperative and postoperative IMT on various respiratory variables and postsurgical outcomes. We synthesized data from multiple studies, encompassing diverse patient populations and IMT protocols. The key outcomes included the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and others.

Results: Our meta-analysis results showed that preoperative IMT significantly improved the MIP values with a pooled standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.62. The hospital stay length was also reduced with a SMD of - 0.4. Other variables such as FEV1 and FVC also improved significantly. Postoperative IMT improved the MIP and peak flow rate values, but the evidence was less robust than with preoperative interventions. We observed high heterogeneity across studies for several outcomes and found evidence of publication bias for some postoperative measures.

Conclusion: Both preoperative and postoperative IMT offer benefits for patients undergoing operations, especially by enhancing respiratory muscle strength and potentially reducing hospital stays. However, the presence of heterogeneity and publication bias underscores the need for further standardized research to consolidate these findings and standardize IMT protocols for optimal patient outcomes.

Purpose: To compare arm-ergometry and treadmill supervised exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness and walking distances in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Methods: ARMEX was a single-center, single-blinded, parallel group, non-inferiority trial enrolling symptomatic patients with PAD. Patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) to a 12-wk arm-ergometry (AEx) or standard treadmill (TEx) supervised exercise training protocol. The powered primary end point was the change in peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) at 12 wk, measured on a treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX). Secondary outcomes included changes in VO 2 at the first ventilatory threshold (VT-1), ventilatory efficiency (ratio of minute ventilation [VE] to carbon dioxide production [VCO 2 ], VE/VCO 2 ), walking distances by CPX and 6-min walking test (6MWT), and self-reported walking limitations.

Results: Fifty-six patients (66 ± 8 yr; 88% male) were randomized (AEx, n = 28; TEx, n = 28). At 12 wk, VO 2peak change was not significantly different between groups (0.75 mL/kg/min; 95% CI, -0.94 to 2.44; P = .378), despite a significant increase only in AEx. VO 2 at VT-1 improved in both groups without between-group differences, and VE/VCO 2 slope improved more in AEx. The TEx attained greater improvements in walking distance by CPX (121.08 m; 95% CI, 24.49-217.66; P = .015) and 6MWT (25.08 m; 95% CI, 5.87-44.29; P = .012) and self-perceived walking distance.

Conclusions: Arm-ergometry was noninferior to standard treadmill training for VO 2peak , and treadmill training was associated with greater improvements in walking distance. Our data support the use of treadmill as a first-line choice in patients with PAD to enhance walking capacity, but arm-ergometry could be an option in selected patients.

Purpose: Given the difficulty to perform exercise training wearing a mask, we examined differences in functional capacity improvement between masking during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and non-masking prior to the pandemic for patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

Methods: Records of 660 patients who underwent and completed ≥ 18 sessions of CR in 2018 (n = 318, non-masking) and in 2022 (n = 342, masking) at an academic health system were analyzed. The primary outcome was post-CR change in functional capacity in metabolic equivalents (MET) measured by exercise stress test. Sessions of CR participation and changes in depression, anxiety, and quality of life scores were secondary outcomes. We used multivariable linear regression to adjust for differences in baseline CR outcome measures, demographics, American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) risk, and comorbid conditions.

Results: Baseline age (64.6 ± 0.46 yr), sex (28% female), and racial distribution (85% white) were similar between the masking and non-masking groups. Non-masking patients were more likely to be classified in the AACVPR high risk category and had lower anxiety scores at baseline compared to masking patients. After CR, both groups had similar and significant improvements in depression, anxiety, and quality of life scores, but the improvement in functional capacity was lower in the masking group (-0.62 ± 0.12 MET, P < .001) compared to the non-masking group. Results remained significant after multivariable adjustment.

Conclusions: Cardiac rehabilitation patients requiring masking during the COVID-19 pandemic had less improvement in functional capacity than patients who did not wear masks during CR prior to the pandemic. Interventions to mitigate the potential side effects of masking for CR patients may require further exploration.