Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention最新文献

Purpose: Given the difficulty to perform exercise training wearing a mask, we examined differences in functional capacity improvement between masking during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and non-masking prior to the pandemic for patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

Methods: Records of 660 patients who underwent and completed ≥ 18 sessions of CR in 2018 (n = 318, non-masking) and in 2022 (n = 342, masking) at an academic health system were analyzed. The primary outcome was post-CR change in functional capacity in metabolic equivalents (MET) measured by exercise stress test. Sessions of CR participation and changes in depression, anxiety, and quality of life scores were secondary outcomes. We used multivariable linear regression to adjust for differences in baseline CR outcome measures, demographics, American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) risk, and comorbid conditions.

Results: Baseline age (64.6 ± 0.46 yr), sex (28% female), and racial distribution (85% white) were similar between the masking and non-masking groups. Non-masking patients were more likely to be classified in the AACVPR high risk category and had lower anxiety scores at baseline compared to masking patients. After CR, both groups had similar and significant improvements in depression, anxiety, and quality of life scores, but the improvement in functional capacity was lower in the masking group (-0.62 ± 0.12 MET, P < .001) compared to the non-masking group. Results remained significant after multivariable adjustment.

Conclusions: Cardiac rehabilitation patients requiring masking during the COVID-19 pandemic had less improvement in functional capacity than patients who did not wear masks during CR prior to the pandemic. Interventions to mitigate the potential side effects of masking for CR patients may require further exploration.

Purpose: To compare arm-ergometry and treadmill supervised exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness and walking distances in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Methods: ARMEX was a single-center, single-blinded, parallel group, non-inferiority trial enrolling symptomatic patients with PAD. Patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) to a 12-wk arm-ergometry (AEx) or standard treadmill (TEx) supervised exercise training protocol. The powered primary end point was the change in peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) at 12 wk, measured on a treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX). Secondary outcomes included changes in VO 2 at the first ventilatory threshold (VT-1), ventilatory efficiency (ratio of minute ventilation [VE] to carbon dioxide production [VCO 2 ], VE/VCO 2 ), walking distances by CPX and 6-min walking test (6MWT), and self-reported walking limitations.

Results: Fifty-six patients (66 ± 8 yr; 88% male) were randomized (AEx, n = 28; TEx, n = 28). At 12 wk, VO 2peak change was not significantly different between groups (0.75 mL/kg/min; 95% CI, -0.94 to 2.44; P = .378), despite a significant increase only in AEx. VO 2 at VT-1 improved in both groups without between-group differences, and VE/VCO 2 slope improved more in AEx. The TEx attained greater improvements in walking distance by CPX (121.08 m; 95% CI, 24.49-217.66; P = .015) and 6MWT (25.08 m; 95% CI, 5.87-44.29; P = .012) and self-perceived walking distance.

Conclusions: Arm-ergometry was noninferior to standard treadmill training for VO 2peak , and treadmill training was associated with greater improvements in walking distance. Our data support the use of treadmill as a first-line choice in patients with PAD to enhance walking capacity, but arm-ergometry could be an option in selected patients.

Objective: To perform a systematic review of completion rates of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in adults aged 18 to 50 yr and describe how core components were reported, measured, and tailored to those under 50 yr.

Review methods: Database search of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library based on keywords, including articles from January 1, 1990. The last search was performed on April 21, 2023. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses protocol, eligible articles contained adults (aged between 18 and 50 yr) who had participated in a CR program.

Summary: Out of the articles screened (n = 24,517), 33 reports across 31 independent studies were considered eligible (n = 1958 patients aged ≤50 yr). Cardiac rehabilitation completion rates ranged from 64% to 100%; however, only 5 studies presented a completion rate definition. The length of the program ranged from 7 d to 20 wk, with most (65%) ranging between 6 and 12 wk. While the studies included in this systematic review indicated relatively high rates of completing CR, these are likely to overrepresent the true completion rates as few definitions were provided that could be compared to completion rates used in clinical practice. This systematic review also found that all interventions prescribed exercise (eg, aerobic alone or combined with resistance training or yoga) but had very limited inclusion or description of other integral components of CR (eg, initial assessment and smoking cessation) or how they were assessed and individualized to meet the needs of younger attendees.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between aortic stiffening and brachial and central ambulatory blood pressure (AMBP) in a nonclinical sample of middle-aged and older adults (MA/O). We hypothesized aortic stiffness would be positively associated with 24-hr, daytime, and nighttime brachial and central AMBP.

Methods: Fifty-one participants aged ≥50 yr (21 males and 30 females, mean age 63.4 ± 9.0 yr) with a body mass index <35 kg/m 2 who also had a resting brachial blood pressure (BP) <160/100 mmHg with or without BP medications were recruited for this cross-sectional analysis. All participants underwent measures of aortic stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity [cfPWV]) and 24-hr AMBP monitoring. Bivariate correlations assessed the relationship between cfPWV, brachial, and central AMBP. Partial correlations were used to independently adjust for traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors including age, sex, waist circumference, glucose, and augmentation index normalized to heart rate 75 bpm, a surrogate measure of arterial stiffness, and in a multivariable combined model.

Results: Nighttime brachial systolic BP ( r = 0.31) and central systolic BP ( r = 0.30) were correlated with cfPWV in the multivariable combined model ( P ≤ .05). Nighttime brachial pulse pressure and central pulse pressure were correlated with cfPWV after independently adjusting for all CVD risk factors ( P ≤ .05, all) but not when combined in the multivariable model ( P > .05).

Conclusions: Higher nighttime brachial and central AMBP with older age are related, in part, to greater aortic stiffening. Therefore, interventions to lower or prevent aortic stiffening may also lower nighttime BP in MA/O adults to lower CVD risk.

Purpose: While research demonstrates low levels of physical activity (PA) among adults living with atrial fibrillation (AF), there is limited evidence investigating sex differences in moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time in this population. The primary aim was to examine sex differences in MVPA levels and sitting time between women and men with AF. Secondary aims explored sex differences in sociodemographic factors, outcome expectations, and task self-efficacy toward PA levels.

Methods: This was a subanalysis of the CHAMPLAIN-AF cohort study. Women and men with AF completed a survey, including the Short-Form International Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Results: A total of 210 women (median = 66.0 yr: 95% CI, 63.5-68.0) and 409 men (median = 66.0 yr: 95% CI, 64.0-67.0) were included. No sex differences were observed in median weekly MVPA (60 min/wk: 95% CI, 0-120 in women vs 120 min/wk: 95% CI, 85-150 in men) and daily sitting time (5.5 hr/d: 95% CI, 5.0-6.0 in women vs 6.0 hr/d: 95% CI, 5.0-6.0 in men). Women engaged in significantly less vigorous-intensity PA than men ( P = .03) and demonstrated significantly lower task self-efficacy ( P < .01). Significant positive correlations in PA levels with outcome expectations (mostly weak) and task self-efficacy (mostly strong) were observed in both sexes.

Conclusion: Most women and men with AF did not meet the global MVPA guidelines but met the sitting time recommendation. Women presented with lower vigorous-intensity physical activity levels and confidence than men. Strategies to increase physical activity behavior, considering sociodemographic factors and task self-efficacy, are needed and may differ between sexes.

Purpose: The physiological adaptations stimulated by a sauna bath (SB) are similar to those produced by moderate- or high-intensity physical activity (PA), but the relationship between SB and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is not clear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between frequency and duration of SB with CRF.

Methods: Baseline SB habits were assessed in 2012 men aged 42 -61 yr. CRF was directly measured using a respiratory gas exchange analyzer during cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and 11 yr later. The associations of SB frequency and duration with baseline and 11-yr levels of CRF were examined using robust regression analyses adjusted for several confounders, including lifestyle factors such as PA.

Results: In baseline analysis, a unit increase in sauna sessions/wk was associated with an increase in CRF 0.30 mL/kg/min (standard error [SE]: 0.14; P = .034). Alternatively, compared with a single sauna sessions/wk, 2-3 and 4-7 sauna sessions/wk was each associated with significant increases in levels of CRF: 0.84 mL/kg/min (SE: 0.32; P = .008) and 1.17 mL/kg/min (SE: 0.57; P = .041), respectively. In longitudinal analysis, frequent SB was associated with increases in 11-yr CRF levels, but this was only significant for 2-3 sauna sessions/wk compared with a single sauna sessions/wk: 1.22 mL/kg/min (SE: 0.59; P = .038). Duration of SB was not significantly associated with CRF levels in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

Conclusions: Frequent SB may improve levels of CRF independently of PA. These results warrant replication in robust definitive randomized controlled trials.