Journal of cancer research and therapeutics最新文献

Introduction: Esophageal carcinoma is the fourth most common cancer among males and sixth most common cancer among females in Sri Lanka. Gastric cancer is less common, but its incidence is gradually rising. We conducted a retrospective analysis of survival of esophageal and gastric cancer patients treated at National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka.

Methodology: Patients with esophageal and gastric cancer treated in three selected oncology units of the National Cancer Institute, Maharagama during 2015 and 2016 were included in the study. Data on clinical and pathological factors were extracted from clinical records. Overall survival (OS), defined as time to death or loss to follow-up, was the primary endpoint. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival were performed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazard model, respectively.

Results: The study population comprised 374 patients with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range 55-70). Majority (64%) were male and had squamous cell carcinoma (58%). In the sample, 20% were gastric cancers, while 71% were esophageal cancers, and 9% had gastro-esophageal junction tumors. The 2-year OS was 19% in patients treated with curative intent (95% confidence interval [CI] 14-26 months) with those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by radical surgery having the highest survival (P < 0.001, hazard ratio 0.25 [95% CI 0.11-0.56]). Median OS was 2 months (95% CI 1-2 months) in patients treated with palliative intent.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the outcome of patients with esophageal and gastric cancer is poor in Sri Lanka. Early detection and greater utilization of multimodality treatment could improve outcomes of these patients.

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are effective treatment options for both early-stage and advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Because of AIs are used long term in adjuvant therapy, side effects are also very important. It is considered that AIs may affect cognitive functions by decreasing the level of estrogen in the brain. The purpose of our study is that evaluate the relationship between duration of treatment and cognitive functions in patients with breast cancer who use AIs in adjuvant therapy.

Methods: Two-hundred patients diagnosed with breast cancer who were treated with AIs as adjuvant treatment were included. The patients were surveyed for demographic characteristics. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMT) tests were performed to evaluate patients' cognitive functions. The total scores of the tests and the orientation, short-time memory, visuospatial functions, attention, language, executive functions which are the MoCA subscales were evaluated separately. Patients were grouped as 0-6, 6-12, 12-24, 24-36, 36, and more months according to the duration of AIs using time.

Results: The total MoCA and SMMT scores were affected by factors such as age, education level, and employment status. There was no relationship between duration of treatment and cognitive functions in patients with breast cancer who use AIs in adjuvant therapy (P > 0.05). In addition, no statistically relationship was found in the evaluation of MoCA subscales (P > 0.05).

Discussion: Prolonged adjuvant treatment with AIs does not affect cognitive functions in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients.

Introduction: Head and neck cancers are one of the common malignancies in Indian population. It's entity, nasopharyngeal carcinoma is among the aggressive malignancies with its location and spread near very critical structures. Thus requires a highly conformal radiotherapy delivery techniques.

Purpose: The aim of the study is to dosimetrically evaluate and to compare Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans and RAPID ARC plans for irradiation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Material and method: A retrospective study is done on 10 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, who were treated with Radiotherapy at ATRCTRI Bikaner. Radiotherapy was delivered by IMRT technique (Total of 70 Gy in 33 fractions). Same patients are now planned on Rapid arc technique. Dosimetric comparison is done in terms of PTV coverage, OAR dose, conformity index, homogeneity index.

Result: PTV coverage is similar with both the plans. Homogeneity index is higher for IMRT plans 0.119+/- 0.020 compared to 0.104 +/- 0.018 for Rapid arc plans (statistically significant).The Rapid arc plans achieved slightly better conformity 1.018+/-0.09, whereas 1.105+/-0.12 for IMRT plans. Rapid arc achieved better results for OAR, statistically significant for Brainstem (54.4 +/-10.4 Gy for IMRT and 49.7+/-4.2 Gy for Rapid Arc, Lens (Left lens and Right lens received 10.55+/-5.8 Gy and 9.44+/-9.08 by IMRT and 6.12+/-6.1 Gy and 5.45+/-6.05 Gy for Rapid Arc), optic nerves (Right and Left optic nerve received 34.36 and 35.01 Gy for IMRT plans and 30.06 and 30.05 Gy for Rapid Arc plans. However the gains are statistically insignificant for spinal cord and vestibulocochlear nerve. No major difference found for Right and left parotid between both the arms.

Conclusions: Rapid Arc is better technique compared to IMRT for Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment, that provides better dose conformity, more homogeneous coverage and OAR sparing. However study is retrospective and has lesser patients, thus requires prospective study with more number of patients along with comparison of clinical outcome.

Aim: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of different algorithms for flattening filter-free (FFF) and flattened (FF) photon beams in three different in-homogeneities.

Materials and method: Computed tomography (CT) image sets of the CIRS phantom maintained in the SAD setup by placing the ionization chamber in the lung, bone, and tissue regions, respectively, were acquired. The treatment planning system (TPS) calculated and the ionization chamber measured the doses at the center of the chamber (in the three mediums) were recorded for the flattened and non-flattened photon beams.

Results: The results were reported for photon energies of 6 MV, 10 MV, 15 MV, 6 FFF, and 10 FFF of field sizes 5 × 5 cm², 10 × 10 cm², and 15 × 15 cm². In the bone inhomogeneity, the pencil beam algorithm predicted that the maximum dose variation was 4.88% of measured chamber dose in 10-MV photon energy for the field size 10 × 10 cm². In water inhomogeneity, both the collapsed cone and Monte Carlo algorithm predicted that the maximum dose variation was ± 3% of measured chamber dose in 10-MV photon energy for the field size 10 × 10 cm² and in 10-MV FFF photon energy for the field size 5 × 5 cm², whereas in lung inhomogeneity, the pencil beam algorithm predicted that the highest dose variation was - 6.9% of measured chamber dose in 10-MV FFF photon energy for the field size 5 × 5 cm².

Conclusion: FF and FFF beams performed differently in lung, water, and bone mediums. The assessment of algorithms was conducted using the anthropomorphic phantom; therefore, these findings may help in the selection of appropriate algorithms for particular clinical settings in radiation delivery.

Context: Patients with head-and-neck cancers can develop salivary gland hypofunction after radiotherapy. Oral pilocarpine has been shown to be effective treatment for radiation-induced xerostomia, although its usefulness is being discussed.

Aims: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of oral pilocarpine in radiation-induced xerostomia.

Materials and methods: Sixty patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma were planned for radiotherapy and divided into two arms randomly: Arm A (30 patients) received oral pilocarpine and Arm B (30 patients) received placebo tablets for 12 weeks after 3 months of completion of radiotherapy. Salivary gland scintigraphy and xerostomia questionnaire (XQ) were obtained from each patient at baseline and at 3 and 6 months of completion of radiotherapy.

Results: There was a marked decrease in uptake ratio (UR) and excretion fraction (EF) after 3 months of completion of radiotherapy. There was a statistically significant difference between both the arms in relation to UR, but no significant difference was observed between the two arms in relation to EF after 6 months of completion of radiotherapy. A statistically significant difference was found comparing the XQ results in both the arms. The XQ results did not correlate with salivary gland dysfunction observed by means of salivary scintigraphy. Adverse effects due to xerostomia were generally mild and occasionally of moderate severity.

Conclusion: The use of oral pilocarpine did not significantly improve salivary gland excretory function, despite better results on salivary uptake at 6 months. However, oral pilocarpine significantly improved symptoms of xerostomia with minor side effects that were predominantly limited to sweating.

Objective: The study is a retrospective comparison of the usefulness of salvage surgery between a group of previously radiotherapy-treated patients (RTPs) and a group of patients who previously underwent partial surgery with both local and ± nodal recurrence.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Multi-center academic hospital.

Materials and methods: The former group was comprised 30 previously RTPs, whereas the latter group consisted of 20 patients after partial laryngeal surgery with optional subsequent adjuvant radiotherapy (PSPs). Treatment efficacy was compared in both groups in relation to overall survival (OS) and the locoregional control rate (LCR). Local and ± nodal recurrence was considered primary treatment failure. All patients underwent total laryngectomy.

Results: The updated 5-year OS in the PSPs was 31%, while the percentage of the updated 5-year LCR was 42%. In the RTPs the updated 5-year OS was 21%, and the percentage of 5-year LCR was 38%. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of the comparison of OS or the comparison of LCR results in both groups (P = 0.427, P = 0.704, respectively).

Conclusions: Based on the analysis, it was found that irrespective of the initial treatment, salvage surgery was associated with decreased survival and cure rates (by 50%) compared to the group of patients with advanced laryngeal cancer who underwent primary total laryngectomy.

Objective: This study to evaluate clinicopathological parameters such as age, tumor location, tumor size, grade, depth of invasion (DOI), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), lymph node metastasis, and stage that predict peri-neural invasion (PNI) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Material and methods: A retrospective study on 1716 postoperative OSCC patients who satisfied the eligibility criteria and treated from January 2009 to December 2019 was analyzed using IBM SPSS V23. Mean and percentage were assessed using descriptive statistics. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare continuous variables, while Chi-square test was used to compare discrete variables between PNI-positive and PNI-negative groups. Two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results: Out of 1716 patients, 553 were PNI positive. The mean age was 48.76 ± 12.42 years in PNI-positive patients while 51.52 ± 12.51 years in PNI-negative patients. Males outnumbered females. The most common primary was carcinoma buccal mucosa (204, 36.9%), followed by carcinoma of oral tongue (161,29.1%). Maximum tumor size was 3.14 ± 1.20 cm in PNI-positive patients whereas 2.78 ± 1.22 cm in PNI-negative patients. Sixty (10.84%) patients in PNI-positive group and 51 (4.38%) in PNI-negative group had LVSI positive. Lymph node involvement was observed in 305 (55.13%) patients in PNI-positive group whereas 358 (30.78%) patients in PNI-negative group. Maximum number 228 (41.3%) in PNI-positive patients were in Stage IVA disease.

Conclusion: PNI is one of the important adverse prognostic factors having a definite correlation with anatomical subsite, tumor size, grade, DOI, LVSI, lymph node involvement, and stage of the disease. PNI should be analyzed in postoperative histopathology report of OSCC that guides the clinician for adjuvant therapy.

Leiomyosarcomas (LMSs) of the head and neck are an extremely rare entity. Of all smooth muscle tumors, 4%-10% occur in the head and neck and only 0.06% in the oral cavity. Because of its infrequency, it has been associated with both delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. Here, we report the clinicopathological findings of a case of primary LMS of the soft palate in a 42-year-old male patient with an emphasis on the judicious use of ancillary diagnostic modalities to arrive at a definitive diagnosis. Intraorally, LMSs present as painless, lobulated, fixed masses of the submucosal tissues in middle-aged or older individuals. The treatment modalities and lymph nodal dissection criteria are dissimilar to more common oral carcinomas. Hence, definitive diagnosis is necessary.