首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Attention Disorders最新文献

英文 中文
Prescription Stimulant Continuation in Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes. 处方兴奋剂在妊娠和分娩结局中的延续。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251397034
Shaquib Al Hasan, Meena Murugappan, Sarah Westberg, Stephen A Contag, Tanya Melnik, Abhijeet Rajpurohit, Joel F Farley
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although studies examining utero exposure to prescription stimulants have suggested an association with maternal and fetal adverse events, results have been inconsistent. Therefore, clinicians may not have clear guidance about stimulant use during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate maternal and fetal risks of prescription stimulant exposure among women of reproductive age throughout the continuum of pregnancy in a large, commercially insured United States population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a large administrative claims database from 2013 to 2021 to compare stimulant exposed pregnancies to a matched cohort of non-exposed pregnancies. Stimulant exposed pregnancies included early stimulant use, defined as one or more stimulant prescription fills at any point during the first trimester and continued exposure, defined as continuation into the second or third trimesters. Relative risk regression models were used to compare the risk of each outcome between exposure and duration of exposure cohorts matched on clinical conditions and medication used by 1:1 greedy neighbor propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a sample of 10,265 matched patients, early stimulant exposure (first trimester only) was associated with a higher likelihood of live birth (RR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.06, 1.10]) and lower risks of spontaneous abortion (RR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.64, 0.76]) and preterm birth (RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.62, 0.90]) compared with no stimulant exposure. Stillbirth and ectopic pregnancy did not differ. When exposure continued into the second or third trimesters, risks increased for placental abruption (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.03, 2.57]), pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.19, 1.69]), gestational hypertension (RR = 1.37, 95% CI [1.16, 1.61]), and preterm birth (RR = 1.34, 95% CI [1.12, 1.62]) compared with non-exposed pregnancies. Stillbirth was not significantly different in this comparison (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [0.76, 2.67]). Direct comparison of continued versus early exposure highlighted more pronounced risks with continuation: higher stillbirth (RR = 3.54, 95% CI [1.48, 8.44]), spontaneous abortion (RR = 1.53, 95% CI [1.38, 1.68]), preterm birth (RR = 1.86, 95% CI [1.51, 2.28]), placental abruption (RR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.11, 2.84]), and pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.12, 1.59]). Small-for-gestational-age infants were also more frequent in the continuation group (RR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.12, 1.92]). Analyses stratified by stimulant class (amphetamine vs methylphenidate containing) were directionally consistent with the overall findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although early stimulant exposure was not associated with increases in maternal or fetal risk, our study suggests that continuation of stimulants into trimesters 2 and/or 3 may increase some pregnancy complications including stillbirth, preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and placental abruption. Cl
目的:尽管研究表明子宫暴露于处方兴奋剂与母体和胎儿不良事件有关,但结果并不一致。因此,临床医生可能没有关于怀孕期间兴奋剂使用的明确指导。本研究的目的是评估在美国大量商业保险人群中,育龄妇女在整个怀孕期间暴露于处方兴奋剂的母婴风险。方法:我们使用2013年至2021年的大型行政索赔数据库,比较兴奋剂暴露妊娠与非暴露妊娠的匹配队列。兴奋剂暴露妊娠包括早期使用兴奋剂,定义为在妊娠早期的任何时候使用一种或多种兴奋剂处方,以及持续使用兴奋剂,定义为持续使用到妊娠中期或晚期。采用相对风险回归模型,比较按1:1贪心邻居倾向评分匹配的临床条件和用药情况匹配的暴露和暴露时间队列之间各结果的风险。结果:在10265例匹配的患者样本中,与未接触兴奋剂的患者相比,早期兴奋剂暴露(仅妊娠早期)与更高的活产可能性(RR = 1.08, 95% CI[1.06, 1.10])和更低的自然流产(RR = 0.69, 95% CI[0.64, 0.76])和早产(RR = 0.75, 95% CI[0.62, 0.90])相关。死胎和异位妊娠没有差异。当暴露持续到妊娠中期或晚期时,与未暴露妊娠相比,胎盘早剥(RR = 1.63, 95% CI[1.03, 2.57])、先兆子痫(RR = 1.42, 95% CI[1.19, 1.69])、妊娠期高血压(RR = 1.37, 95% CI[1.16, 1.61])和早产(RR = 1.34, 95% CI[1.12, 1.62])的风险增加。死产在两组比较中无显著差异(RR = 1.42, 95% CI[0.76, 2.67])。直接比较继续暴露与早期暴露,可以发现继续暴露更明显的风险:更高的死产(RR = 3.54, 95% CI[1.48, 8.44])、自然流产(RR = 1.53, 95% CI[1.38, 1.68])、早产(RR = 1.86, 95% CI[1.51, 2.28])、胎盘早剥(RR = 1.78, 95% CI[1.11, 2.84])和先兆子痫(RR = 1.33, 95% CI[1.12, 1.59])。在继续组中,小胎龄儿的发生率也更高(RR = 1.47, 95% CI[1.12, 1.92])。按兴奋剂类别(安非他明与含哌甲酯)分层的分析方向与总体结果一致。结论:尽管早期兴奋剂暴露与母体或胎儿风险增加无关,但我们的研究表明,在妊娠2和/或3个月继续使用兴奋剂可能会增加一些妊娠并发症,包括死胎、早产、妊娠高血压疾病和胎盘早剥。临床医生在决定在怀孕期间继续使用兴奋剂时应该考虑到这些风险,尤其是在治疗多动症时。
{"title":"Prescription Stimulant Continuation in Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes.","authors":"Shaquib Al Hasan, Meena Murugappan, Sarah Westberg, Stephen A Contag, Tanya Melnik, Abhijeet Rajpurohit, Joel F Farley","doi":"10.1177/10870547251397034","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251397034","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Although studies examining utero exposure to prescription stimulants have suggested an association with maternal and fetal adverse events, results have been inconsistent. Therefore, clinicians may not have clear guidance about stimulant use during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate maternal and fetal risks of prescription stimulant exposure among women of reproductive age throughout the continuum of pregnancy in a large, commercially insured United States population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We used a large administrative claims database from 2013 to 2021 to compare stimulant exposed pregnancies to a matched cohort of non-exposed pregnancies. Stimulant exposed pregnancies included early stimulant use, defined as one or more stimulant prescription fills at any point during the first trimester and continued exposure, defined as continuation into the second or third trimesters. Relative risk regression models were used to compare the risk of each outcome between exposure and duration of exposure cohorts matched on clinical conditions and medication used by 1:1 greedy neighbor propensity score matching.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Among a sample of 10,265 matched patients, early stimulant exposure (first trimester only) was associated with a higher likelihood of live birth (RR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.06, 1.10]) and lower risks of spontaneous abortion (RR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.64, 0.76]) and preterm birth (RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.62, 0.90]) compared with no stimulant exposure. Stillbirth and ectopic pregnancy did not differ. When exposure continued into the second or third trimesters, risks increased for placental abruption (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.03, 2.57]), pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.19, 1.69]), gestational hypertension (RR = 1.37, 95% CI [1.16, 1.61]), and preterm birth (RR = 1.34, 95% CI [1.12, 1.62]) compared with non-exposed pregnancies. Stillbirth was not significantly different in this comparison (RR = 1.42, 95% CI [0.76, 2.67]). Direct comparison of continued versus early exposure highlighted more pronounced risks with continuation: higher stillbirth (RR = 3.54, 95% CI [1.48, 8.44]), spontaneous abortion (RR = 1.53, 95% CI [1.38, 1.68]), preterm birth (RR = 1.86, 95% CI [1.51, 2.28]), placental abruption (RR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.11, 2.84]), and pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.12, 1.59]). Small-for-gestational-age infants were also more frequent in the continuation group (RR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.12, 1.92]). Analyses stratified by stimulant class (amphetamine vs methylphenidate containing) were directionally consistent with the overall findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Although early stimulant exposure was not associated with increases in maternal or fetal risk, our study suggests that continuation of stimulants into trimesters 2 and/or 3 may increase some pregnancy complications including stillbirth, preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and placental abruption. Cl","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"315-328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parental Stress and Child Irritability in ADHD: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Serial Mediation Model via Experiential Avoidance and Negative Parent-Child Relationship. 父母压力与ADHD儿童易怒:一种基于经验回避和负性亲子关系的双波纵向序列中介模型。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251407731
Armagan Aral, Gizem Gerdan, Yılmaz Orhun Gürlük

ADHD is complex neurodevelopmental disorder that causes considerable individual and social difficulties, creating significant parental stress. This study aimed to examine the indirect associations between parental stress and child irritability through two sequential parenting mechanisms: experiential avoidance and negative parent-child relationship, within a sample of school-aged children with ADHD (ages 6-12). Using a two-wave longitudinal serial path analysis based on parent-reported data collected at two time points 1-month apart (Time 1 and Time 2), the study investigated whether early parental stress predicted subsequent child irritability via its influence on experiential avoidance and the quality of the parent-child relationship. Findings supported the hypothesized model. More precisely, higher parental stress was associated with greater experiential avoidance, which in turn predicted more negative parent-child relationship, ultimately resulting in elevated child irritability. Longitudinal serial mediation effects confirmed that all Time 1 variables significantly predicted corresponding Time 2 outcomes across the proposed sequential pathway. Notably, the model explained 41.1% of the variance in child irritability at Time 2, underscoring how stress-related disruptions in experiential avoidance and parent-child relationship can affect child irritability even over a short period of time. Taken together, these findings provide empirical support for a stress-driven sequence of parental mechanisms through which parental stress may contribute to child irritability in ADHD. In this context, interventions targeting parental experiential avoidance and improving the quality of parent-child relationship may help mitigate the early development of irritability in children with ADHD. Clinical implications are discussed.

多动症是一种复杂的神经发育障碍,会导致相当大的个人和社会困难,给父母带来巨大的压力。本研究旨在探讨父母压力与儿童易怒之间的间接联系,通过两种顺序的养育机制:经验回避和消极的亲子关系,在6-12岁的学龄ADHD儿童样本中。本研究采用双波纵向序列路径分析,基于相隔1个月的两个时间点(时间1和时间2)收集的父母报告数据,研究早期父母压力是否通过其对经验回避和亲子关系质量的影响来预测随后的儿童易怒。研究结果支持假设模型。更准确地说,更高的父母压力与更大的经验回避有关,这反过来又预示着更消极的亲子关系,最终导致孩子易怒。纵向序列中介效应证实,所有Time 1变量都能显著预测相应的时序通路中的Time 2结果。值得注意的是,该模型解释了41.1%的时间2儿童易怒的差异,强调了体验回避和亲子关系中的压力相关中断如何在短时间内影响儿童易怒。综上所述,这些发现为压力驱动的父母机制序列提供了经验支持,通过父母压力可能导致ADHD儿童易怒。在这种背景下,针对父母体验回避和改善亲子关系质量的干预措施可能有助于减轻ADHD儿童早期易怒的发展。讨论了临床意义。
{"title":"Parental Stress and Child Irritability in ADHD: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Serial Mediation Model via Experiential Avoidance and Negative Parent-Child Relationship.","authors":"Armagan Aral, Gizem Gerdan, Yılmaz Orhun Gürlük","doi":"10.1177/10870547251407731","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251407731","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ADHD is complex neurodevelopmental disorder that causes considerable individual and social difficulties, creating significant parental stress. This study aimed to examine the indirect associations between parental stress and child irritability through two sequential parenting mechanisms: experiential avoidance and negative parent-child relationship, within a sample of school-aged children with ADHD (ages 6-12). Using a two-wave longitudinal serial path analysis based on parent-reported data collected at two time points 1-month apart (Time 1 and Time 2), the study investigated whether early parental stress predicted subsequent child irritability via its influence on experiential avoidance and the quality of the parent-child relationship. Findings supported the hypothesized model. More precisely, higher parental stress was associated with greater experiential avoidance, which in turn predicted more negative parent-child relationship, ultimately resulting in elevated child irritability. Longitudinal serial mediation effects confirmed that all Time 1 variables significantly predicted corresponding Time 2 outcomes across the proposed sequential pathway. Notably, the model explained 41.1% of the variance in child irritability at Time 2, underscoring how stress-related disruptions in experiential avoidance and parent-child relationship can affect child irritability even over a short period of time. Taken together, these findings provide empirical support for a stress-driven sequence of parental mechanisms through which parental stress may contribute to child irritability in ADHD. In this context, interventions targeting parental experiential avoidance and improving the quality of parent-child relationship may help mitigate the early development of irritability in children with ADHD. Clinical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"342-353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accessibility of ADHD Assessments in Australia: A Secret Shopper Study. 澳大利亚ADHD评估的可及性:一项秘密购物者研究。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-25 DOI: 10.1177/10870547261421983
Clare O'Toole, John Finlayson, Stuart Johnstone, Kate Croaker

Aim: This study aimed to provide a representative indication of the accessibility of both adult and child ADHD assessments in Australia for psychologists, psychiatrists, and paediatricians. Accessibility was considered in terms of clinician availability, wait times for an initial session, initial session costs, and total assessment costs across Australian states and territories, remoteness areas, and socioeconomic ranges.

Methods: Using a secret shopper design, researchers posed as potential consumers seeking an ADHD assessment for themselves and/or their child. A total of 736 clinicians were contacted via telephone between May and August 2024.

Results: Fifty-nine percent of clinicians responded, and 49.8% of respondents were available to book an ADHD assessment. The average wait times for psychologists, psychiatrists, and paediatricians were 7, 16, and 31 weeks, respectively (Mdn = 3, 15, and 26; IQR = 7, 16, and 31). The average initial session costs and estimated total assessment costs were $266 and $1,622 for psychologists (Mdn = 250 and 1,625; IQR = 57 and 929), $748 and $1,163 for psychiatrists (Mdn = 750 and 1,086; IQR = 340 and 555), and $500 and $598 for paediatricians (Mdn = 495 and 585; IQR = 123 and 739).

Conclusion: This study identified substantial barriers to ADHD assessment accessibility in Australia. Low clinician availability, long wait times, and high costs for assessments are all factors contributing to healthcare access inequality. Policy changes and investment, as well as further research into contributing factors, are needed to improve availability and accessibility.

目的:本研究旨在为澳大利亚的心理学家、精神科医生和儿科医生提供成人和儿童ADHD评估的可及性的代表性指标。可及性考虑了临床医生的可用性、初次会议的等待时间、初次会议费用以及澳大利亚各州和地区、偏远地区和社会经济范围的总评估费用。方法:采用秘密购物者设计,研究人员扮演潜在消费者,为自己和/或他们的孩子寻求ADHD评估。在2024年5月至8月期间,通过电话联系了736名临床医生。结果:59%的临床医生做出了回应,49.8%的受访者可以预约ADHD评估。心理学家、精神科医生和儿科医生的平均等待时间分别为7、16和31周(Mdn = 3、15和26;IQR = 7、16和31)。心理学家(Mdn = 250和1625;IQR = 57和929)的平均初始疗程成本和估计总评估成本分别为266美元和1622美元,精神科医生(Mdn = 750和1086;IQR = 340和555)的平均初始疗程成本和估计总评估成本分别为748美元和1163美元,儿科医生(Mdn = 495和585;IQR = 123和739)的平均初始疗程成本和估计总评估成本分别为500美元和598美元。结论:本研究确定了澳大利亚ADHD评估可及性的实质性障碍。临床医生可用性低、等待时间长和评估费用高,都是导致医疗保健获取不平等的因素。需要改变政策和投资,以及进一步研究促成因素,以改善可得性和可及性。
{"title":"Accessibility of ADHD Assessments in Australia: A Secret Shopper Study.","authors":"Clare O'Toole, John Finlayson, Stuart Johnstone, Kate Croaker","doi":"10.1177/10870547261421983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547261421983","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to provide a representative indication of the accessibility of both adult and child ADHD assessments in Australia for psychologists, psychiatrists, and paediatricians. Accessibility was considered in terms of clinician availability, wait times for an initial session, initial session costs, and total assessment costs across Australian states and territories, remoteness areas, and socioeconomic ranges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a secret shopper design, researchers posed as potential consumers seeking an ADHD assessment for themselves and/or their child. A total of 736 clinicians were contacted via telephone between May and August 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine percent of clinicians responded, and 49.8% of respondents were available to book an ADHD assessment. The average wait times for psychologists, psychiatrists, and paediatricians were 7, 16, and 31 weeks, respectively (Mdn = 3, 15, and 26; IQR = 7, 16, and 31). The average initial session costs and estimated total assessment costs were $266 and $1,622 for psychologists (Mdn = 250 and 1,625; IQR = 57 and 929), $748 and $1,163 for psychiatrists (Mdn = 750 and 1,086; IQR = 340 and 555), and $500 and $598 for paediatricians (Mdn = 495 and 585; IQR = 123 and 739).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified substantial barriers to ADHD assessment accessibility in Australia. Low clinician availability, long wait times, and high costs for assessments are all factors contributing to healthcare access inequality. Policy changes and investment, as well as further research into contributing factors, are needed to improve availability and accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547261421983"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147306363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Association Between Attention Performance and Empathy in Children Diagnosed with ADHD. ADHD儿童注意力表现与共情的关系
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-12 DOI: 10.1177/10870547261419885
Seyma Soyal, Baris Metin

Objective: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated not only with cognitive impairments but also with deficits in social cognitive abilities, including empathy. Although attention and empathy have been individually studied in children with ADHD, the link between performance-based attention measures and empathy remains underexplored. Thus, this study examined the relationship between attention performance and empathy in children diagnosed with ADHD.

Method: The sample included 53 children aged 7 to 12, consisting of 27 children diagnosed with ADHD and 26 typically developing control group. All participants were recruited from educational and clinical settings. Attention was measured using a computer-based Go/No-Go task, and empathy was assessed using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). ADHD symptom severity was assessed using the Turgay DSM-IV-Based Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale (T-DSM-IV-S).

Results: Children with ADHD made significantly more omission errors and scored lower on RMET than typically developing group. Significant negative correlations were found between RMET total score and omission errors and inattention scores. Regression analyses further supported these associations by indicating that attention-related variables significantly predicted empathy performance.

Conclusion: Attention performance is closely associated with empathy in children with ADHD. These findings underscore the need for early and integrative interventions targeting both attentional and socio-cognitive dimensions in children with ADHD.

目的:注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)不仅与认知障碍有关,还与社会认知能力(包括共情能力)的缺陷有关。虽然注意力和同理心在多动症儿童中被单独研究过,但基于表现的注意力测量和同理心之间的联系仍未得到充分探讨。因此,本研究考察了ADHD儿童的注意力表现和共情之间的关系。方法:选取53例7 ~ 12岁儿童,其中27例为ADHD患儿,26例为正常发育对照组。所有的参与者都是从教育和临床环境中招募的。注意力是通过一个基于电脑的Go/No-Go任务来测量的,同理心是通过眼睛读心测试(RMET)来评估的。使用Turgay基于dsm - iv的破坏性行为障碍评定量表(T-DSM-IV-S)评估ADHD症状严重程度。结果:ADHD患儿在RMET上的遗漏错误明显多于正常发育组,且RMET得分低于正常发育组。RMET总分与遗漏错误和注意力不集中得分呈显著负相关。回归分析进一步支持这些关联,表明注意相关变量显著预测共情表现。结论:ADHD患儿注意表现与共情密切相关。这些发现强调了针对ADHD儿童的注意力和社会认知维度进行早期和综合干预的必要性。
{"title":"The Association Between Attention Performance and Empathy in Children Diagnosed with ADHD.","authors":"Seyma Soyal, Baris Metin","doi":"10.1177/10870547261419885","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547261419885","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated not only with cognitive impairments but also with deficits in social cognitive abilities, including empathy. Although attention and empathy have been individually studied in children with ADHD, the link between performance-based attention measures and empathy remains underexplored. Thus, this study examined the relationship between attention performance and empathy in children diagnosed with ADHD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample included 53 children aged 7 to 12, consisting of 27 children diagnosed with ADHD and 26 typically developing control group. All participants were recruited from educational and clinical settings. Attention was measured using a computer-based Go/No-Go task, and empathy was assessed using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). ADHD symptom severity was assessed using the Turgay DSM-IV-Based Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale (T-DSM-IV-S).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with ADHD made significantly more omission errors and scored lower on RMET than typically developing group. Significant negative correlations were found between RMET total score and omission errors and inattention scores. Regression analyses further supported these associations by indicating that attention-related variables significantly predicted empathy performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Attention performance is closely associated with empathy in children with ADHD. These findings underscore the need for early and integrative interventions targeting both attentional and socio-cognitive dimensions in children with ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547261419885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146180078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Episodic Future Thinking Improves Everyday Prospective Memory Performance in Adults With a Previous Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder by Community Providers. 情景未来思维改善了社区提供者先前诊断为注意缺陷多动障碍的成年人的日常前瞻记忆表现。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-12 DOI: 10.1177/10870547261416467
Mareike Altgassen, Helena Heinrich, Marc-Andreas Edel

This study investigated the effects of the encoding strategy episodic future thinking on prospective memory performance (i.e., remembering to execute intended actions in the future) in individuals with a diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) by community providers. Individuals with ADHD often have difficulties to plan and execute delayed intentions in everyday life; thus, they show reduced prospective memory performance. Several studies indicate that engaging in episodic future thinking (i.e., mentally imagining executing the planned activity) during intention formation can improve prospective memory performance in typically developing populations in lab-based settings. To assess the execution of everyday intentions, we requested participants to perform the diary task. Thirty-two adults with ADHD and 31 controls were allocated to an episodic future thinking encoding condition and 31 adults with ADHD and 33 controls to a standard encoding condition. Analyses of variance revealed significant main effects of group and of encoding condition. Overall, controls remembered to execute more intentions than individuals with ADHD. Across groups, episodic future thinking increased the realization of intentions as compared to the standard encoding condition; however, this effect was no longer significant when verbal ability was statistically controlled. There was no significant interaction effect. This study replicates earlier findings of reduced intention execution in ADHD and provides preliminary support for episodic future thinking as a strategy to enhance PM in daily life, though its effects may depend on verbal ability, warranting further research.

本研究调查了编码策略情景未来思维对社区提供者诊断为注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的个体前瞻记忆表现(即记住在未来执行预期动作)的影响。患有多动症的人在日常生活中经常难以计划和执行延迟的意图;因此,他们表现出较低的前瞻性记忆表现。几项研究表明,在意图形成过程中,参与情景未来思维(即在心理上想象执行计划的活动)可以改善实验室环境中典型发展人群的前瞻记忆表现。为了评估日常意图的执行情况,我们要求参与者完成日记任务。32名ADHD成人和31名对照者被分配到情景未来思维编码条件,31名ADHD成人和33名对照者被分配到标准编码条件。方差分析显示群体和编码条件的主效应显著。总的来说,对照组比ADHD患者记得执行更多的意图。在所有小组中,情景未来思维比标准编码条件下增加了意图的实现;然而,当语言能力受到统计控制时,这种影响就不再显著了。无显著交互作用。本研究重复了先前ADHD患者意图执行减少的研究结果,并为情景未来思维作为一种策略来增强日常生活中的PM提供了初步支持,尽管其效果可能取决于语言能力,值得进一步研究。
{"title":"Episodic Future Thinking Improves Everyday Prospective Memory Performance in Adults With a Previous Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder by Community Providers.","authors":"Mareike Altgassen, Helena Heinrich, Marc-Andreas Edel","doi":"10.1177/10870547261416467","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547261416467","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of the encoding strategy episodic future thinking on prospective memory performance (i.e., remembering to execute intended actions in the future) in individuals with a diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) by community providers. Individuals with ADHD often have difficulties to plan and execute delayed intentions in everyday life; thus, they show reduced prospective memory performance. Several studies indicate that engaging in episodic future thinking (i.e., mentally imagining executing the planned activity) during intention formation can improve prospective memory performance in typically developing populations in lab-based settings. To assess the execution of everyday intentions, we requested participants to perform the diary task. Thirty-two adults with ADHD and 31 controls were allocated to an episodic future thinking encoding condition and 31 adults with ADHD and 33 controls to a standard encoding condition. Analyses of variance revealed significant main effects of group and of encoding condition. Overall, controls remembered to execute more intentions than individuals with ADHD. Across groups, episodic future thinking increased the realization of intentions as compared to the standard encoding condition; however, this effect was no longer significant when verbal ability was statistically controlled. There was no significant interaction effect. This study replicates earlier findings of reduced intention execution in ADHD and provides preliminary support for episodic future thinking as a strategy to enhance PM in daily life, though its effects may depend on verbal ability, warranting further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547261416467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146180075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Youth with Comorbid ADHD and PTSD: Insights from Real-World Data. 青少年多动症和创伤后应激障碍的治疗模式和临床结果:来自现实世界数据的见解。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-12 DOI: 10.1177/10870547261416173
Raman Baweja, Fabiana Lopes, Felix M Padilla, Ritika Baweja, Lisa Amaya-Jackson, Daniel A Waschbusch, James G Waxmonsky

Objectives: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often co-occur in youth, complicating the clinical presentation. However, little is known about how PTSD influences treatment selection or outcomes in youth with ADHD. This study examined prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes among youth with ADHD, with and without comorbid PTSD.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from the TriNetX Research Network, including over 714,000 youth (ages 6-18) diagnosed with ADHD (F90), of whom 30,341 (4.25%) also had comorbid PTSD (F43.1). Outcomes included treatment trends, emergency visits, hospitalizations, and subsequent antipsychotic or mood stabilizer prescriptions. Relative risks (RR), hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for sociodemographic and psychiatric variables.

Results: Among youth with ADHD, those with comorbid PTSD were older, had more psychiatric comorbidities, and were more likely to receive non-stimulants (RR 1.54, 95% CI [1.51, 1.57]), antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers (RRs 1.29-1.70), and psychotherapy (RR 1.55, 95% CI [1.51, 1.60]). Methylphenidate prescriptions were slightly lower (RR 0.97, 95% CI [0.95, 0.99]), while amphetamine use remained stable. Among youth with ADHD and PTSD, CNS stimulants were associated with the most favorable outcomes across all clinical measures, including hospitalizations, emergency visits, and subsequent antipsychotic and mood stabilizer use (aHRs 0.52-0.74), compared with non-stimulants and antidepressants.

Conclusions: Youth with ADHD and PTSD are clinically complex and receive broader treatment interventions. Clinicians appear to de-prioritize stimulants after PTSD diagnosis, despite evidence of superior clinical outcomes. Findings underscore the need for prospective studies and evidence-based treatment guidelines for this high-risk population.

目的:注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)经常在青少年中同时发生,使其临床表现复杂化。然而,关于创伤后应激障碍如何影响青少年多动症患者的治疗选择或结果,我们知之甚少。这项研究检查了青少年ADHD患者的处方模式和临床结果,并检查了有无合并PTSD的情况。方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用来自TriNetX研究网络的电子健康记录数据,包括超过714,000名诊断为ADHD (F90)的青少年(6-18岁),其中30,341名(4.25%)同时患有PTSD (F43.1)。结果包括治疗趋势、急诊就诊、住院情况以及随后的抗精神病药或情绪稳定剂处方。相对危险度(RR)、风险比(HR)和95%置信区间采用倾向评分匹配和Cox比例风险模型计算,并对社会人口学和精神病学变量进行调整。结果:在患有ADHD的青少年中,合并PTSD的患者年龄更大,有更多的精神合并症,更有可能接受非兴奋剂(RR 1.54, 95% CI[1.51, 1.57])、抗抑郁药、抗精神病药、情绪稳定剂(RR 1.29-1.70)和心理治疗(RR 1.55, 95% CI[1.51, 1.60])。哌甲酯处方略低(RR 0.97, 95% CI[0.95, 0.99]),而安非他明的使用保持稳定。在患有多动症和创伤后应激障碍的青少年中,与非兴奋剂和抗抑郁药相比,中枢神经系统兴奋剂与所有临床指标(包括住院、急诊、随后的抗精神病药和情绪稳定剂使用)的最有利结果相关(aHRs 0.52-0.74)。结论:青少年多动症和创伤后应激障碍在临床上是复杂的,需要更广泛的治疗干预。临床医生似乎在PTSD诊断后不再优先考虑兴奋剂,尽管有证据表明临床结果更好。研究结果强调了对这一高危人群进行前瞻性研究和循证治疗指南的必要性。
{"title":"Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Youth with Comorbid ADHD and PTSD: Insights from Real-World Data.","authors":"Raman Baweja, Fabiana Lopes, Felix M Padilla, Ritika Baweja, Lisa Amaya-Jackson, Daniel A Waschbusch, James G Waxmonsky","doi":"10.1177/10870547261416173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547261416173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often co-occur in youth, complicating the clinical presentation. However, little is known about how PTSD influences treatment selection or outcomes in youth with ADHD. This study examined prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes among youth with ADHD, with and without comorbid PTSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from the TriNetX Research Network, including over 714,000 youth (ages 6-18) diagnosed with ADHD (F90), of whom 30,341 (4.25%) also had comorbid PTSD (F43.1). Outcomes included treatment trends, emergency visits, hospitalizations, and subsequent antipsychotic or mood stabilizer prescriptions. Relative risks (RR), hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for sociodemographic and psychiatric variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among youth with ADHD, those with comorbid PTSD were older, had more psychiatric comorbidities, and were more likely to receive non-stimulants (<i>RR</i> 1.54, 95% CI [1.51, 1.57]), antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers (RRs 1.29-1.70), and psychotherapy (<i>RR</i> 1.55, 95% CI [1.51, 1.60]). Methylphenidate prescriptions were slightly lower (<i>RR</i> 0.97, 95% CI [0.95, 0.99]), while amphetamine use remained stable. Among youth with ADHD and PTSD, CNS stimulants were associated with the most favorable outcomes across all clinical measures, including hospitalizations, emergency visits, and subsequent antipsychotic and mood stabilizer use (aHRs 0.52-0.74), compared with non-stimulants and antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Youth with ADHD and PTSD are clinically complex and receive broader treatment interventions. Clinicians appear to de-prioritize stimulants after PTSD diagnosis, despite evidence of superior clinical outcomes. Findings underscore the need for prospective studies and evidence-based treatment guidelines for this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547261416173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146180045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Younger-for-Grade Children are Not at Greater Likelihood for ADHD Diagnosis During Elementary School: Repeated Evidence of a Null Relative Age Effect. 低年级儿童在小学期间诊断ADHD的可能性并不大:零相对年龄效应的重复证据。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251415574
Eric Hengyu Hu, Stephen V Faraone, Paul L Morgan

Background: Prior work reports a relative age effect (RAE), in which children are more likely to be diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) if they are relatively younger than their classmates. Yet work reporting a RAE in ADHD diagnosis has analyzed relatively dated samples, has not examined moderation across sociodemographic characteristics, and has largely not examined the RAE in longitudinal analyses. We examined whether entering kindergarten as a relatively younger student increased the likelihood being diagnosed with ADHD across elementary school. We also examined moderation by race and ethnicity, biological sex, socioeconomic status, and home language.

Methods: We analyzed data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K: 2011; N = 11,410), a nationally representative cohort. Logistic regression models estimated relations between children's relative age and both grade-specific and cumulative ADHD diagnoses during elementary school. Discrete-time event history logit regression models examined the timing of ADHD diagnosis from kindergarten through fifth grade. Interaction terms assessed moderation by sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: We generally failed to observe evidence of a RAE, either cumulatively or within specific grades. Discrete-time event models indicated no significant relations between relative age and timing of ADHD diagnosis. Moderation analyses identified isolated interactions, indicating the possibility of a specific RAE for Black children and those from non-English-speaking homes in select grades. However, these predicted effects were not consistently observed and did not survive correction for multiple comparisons.

Conclusions: In contrast to prior work analyzing older datasets, we failed to observe a RAE in U.S. elementary schools. Our finding suggest that relatively younger children attending U.S. elementary schools are not at increased likelihood for ADHD diagnosis.

背景:先前的研究报告了相对年龄效应(RAE),如果儿童比他们的同学相对年轻,他们更有可能被诊断为注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)。然而,报告ADHD诊断中RAE的工作分析了相对较旧的样本,没有检查社会人口统计学特征的中庸性,而且在很大程度上没有在纵向分析中检查RAE。我们研究了作为一个相对年轻的学生进入幼儿园是否会增加在小学阶段被诊断为多动症的可能性。我们还研究了种族和民族、生理性别、社会经济地位和母语的适度性。方法:我们分析了来自幼儿纵向研究-幼儿园队列(ECLS-K: 2011; N = 11,410)的数据,这是一个具有全国代表性的队列。Logistic回归模型估计了儿童相对年龄与小学阶段特定年级和累积ADHD诊断之间的关系。离散时间事件史logit回归模型检验了从幼儿园到五年级ADHD诊断的时间。通过社会人口学特征评估适度性的相互作用项。结果:我们一般没有观察到RAE的证据,无论是累积的还是特定等级的。离散时间事件模型显示相对年龄和ADHD诊断时间之间没有显著关系。适度分析确定了孤立的相互作用,表明了特定年级黑人儿童和非英语家庭儿童的特定RAE的可能性。然而,这些预测的效果并没有被一致地观察到,也没有在多次比较的校正中幸存下来。结论:与之前分析旧数据集的工作相反,我们未能观察到美国小学的RAE。我们的发现表明,在美国上小学的年纪相对较小的孩子被诊断为多动症的可能性并没有增加。
{"title":"Younger-for-Grade Children are Not at Greater Likelihood for ADHD Diagnosis During Elementary School: Repeated Evidence of a Null Relative Age Effect.","authors":"Eric Hengyu Hu, Stephen V Faraone, Paul L Morgan","doi":"10.1177/10870547251415574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251415574","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior work reports a relative age effect (RAE), in which children are more likely to be diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) if they are relatively younger than their classmates. Yet work reporting a RAE in ADHD diagnosis has analyzed relatively dated samples, has not examined moderation across sociodemographic characteristics, and has largely not examined the RAE in longitudinal analyses. We examined whether entering kindergarten as a relatively younger student increased the likelihood being diagnosed with ADHD across elementary school. We also examined moderation by race and ethnicity, biological sex, socioeconomic status, and home language.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K: 2011; <i>N</i> = 11,410), a nationally representative cohort. Logistic regression models estimated relations between children's relative age and both grade-specific and cumulative ADHD diagnoses during elementary school. Discrete-time event history logit regression models examined the timing of ADHD diagnosis from kindergarten through fifth grade. Interaction terms assessed moderation by sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We generally failed to observe evidence of a RAE, either cumulatively or within specific grades. Discrete-time event models indicated no significant relations between relative age and timing of ADHD diagnosis. Moderation analyses identified isolated interactions, indicating the possibility of a specific RAE for Black children and those from non-English-speaking homes in select grades. However, these predicted effects were not consistently observed and did not survive correction for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to prior work analyzing older datasets, we failed to observe a RAE in U.S. elementary schools. Our finding suggest that relatively younger children attending U.S. elementary schools are not at increased likelihood for ADHD diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547251415574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146157323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ROAR-Early Childhood: Pilot Testing a Brief Telemedicine Parent Training Program for Rural Children Diagnosed with ADHD. 咆哮幼儿:对诊断为多动症的农村儿童的简短远程医疗家长培训计划的试点测试。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251415434
James T Craig, Michael T Sanders, Christina C Moore, Erin Barnett, Kady F Sternberg, Nicole L Breslend, Lauren C Vazquez, Nina Sand-Loud, Mary K Jankowski

Objective: Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a chronic and impairing neurodevelopmental disorder diagnosed in approximately 2% to 4% of preschool-age children and 9% of all children. Behavioral parent training (BPT) and high-quality education are effective treatments for young children with ADHD; however, poor rates of treatment access and participation limit the reach of BPTs to rural and underserved communities. In this study, we tested the newly developed Rural Outreach and ADHD Research-Early Childhood (ROAR-EC) program, a clinician-led, 7-session education and parent training program designed for delivery over telemedicine.

Method: We conducted a pilot RCT to assess the feasibility, acceptability, engagement of mechanism, and exploratory group × time effects of the ROAR-EC program compared to a control group in a sample of 44 children diagnosed with ADHD from a predominantly rural area (ages 3-7; Mage = 4.8; 62% male; 96% White; 89% non-Hispanic/Latinx). Families were randomized into either ROAR-EC or treatment as usual through developmental pediatrics and followed for 24 weeks. Assessed were metrics of feasibility, acceptability, parenting practices, caregiver empowerment, disruptive behaviors, and ADHD symptoms.

Results: Results indicated that ROAR-EC was feasible to implement and acceptable to caregivers. Repeated measures ANOVAs found significant group × time interaction effects in favor of the treatment group compared to control for family empowerment, parenting practices, total behavior problems, impairment, and inattentive symptoms.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the promise of brief telemedicine programs as feasible, acceptable, and likely beneficial alternatives to traditional BPTs for young children with ADHD in rural and low-resource areas.

目的:注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)是一种慢性损害性神经发育障碍,约占学龄前儿童的2%至4%,占所有儿童的9%。行为父母训练(BPT)和高质量教育是治疗幼儿多动症的有效方法;然而,治疗可及性和参与率低限制了BPTs在农村和服务不足社区的推广。在这项研究中,我们测试了新开发的农村拓展和多动症研究-幼儿(ROAR-EC)项目,这是一个由临床医生主导的7期教育和家长培训项目,旨在通过远程医疗提供服务。方法:我们进行了一项试验性随机对照试验,以评估ROAR-EC项目与对照组相比的可行性、可接受性、机制参与和探索性组×时间效应,该样本来自主要农村地区的44名被诊断为ADHD的儿童(年龄3-7岁;Mage = 4.8; 62%男性;96%白人;89%非西班牙裔/拉丁裔)。这些家庭被随机分为ROAR-EC组或通过发育儿科进行常规治疗组,随访24周。评估的指标包括可行性、可接受性、育儿实践、照顾者授权、破坏性行为和ADHD症状。结果:ROAR-EC实施可行,护理人员可接受。重复测量方差分析发现,与对照组相比,治疗组在家庭授权、育儿实践、总体行为问题、损害和注意力不集中症状方面具有显著的组间交互作用。结论:本研究表明,在农村和资源匮乏地区,简短的远程医疗项目是可行的,可接受的,并且可能是传统bpt的有益替代方案。
{"title":"ROAR-Early Childhood: Pilot Testing a Brief Telemedicine Parent Training Program for Rural Children Diagnosed with ADHD.","authors":"James T Craig, Michael T Sanders, Christina C Moore, Erin Barnett, Kady F Sternberg, Nicole L Breslend, Lauren C Vazquez, Nina Sand-Loud, Mary K Jankowski","doi":"10.1177/10870547251415434","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251415434","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a chronic and impairing neurodevelopmental disorder diagnosed in approximately 2% to 4% of preschool-age children and 9% of all children. Behavioral parent training (BPT) and high-quality education are effective treatments for young children with ADHD; however, poor rates of treatment access and participation limit the reach of BPTs to rural and underserved communities. In this study, we tested the newly developed Rural Outreach and ADHD Research-Early Childhood (ROAR-EC) program, a clinician-led, 7-session education and parent training program designed for delivery over telemedicine.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a pilot RCT to assess the feasibility, acceptability, engagement of mechanism, and exploratory group × time effects of the ROAR-EC program compared to a control group in a sample of 44 children diagnosed with ADHD from a predominantly rural area (ages 3-7; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 4.8; 62% male; 96% White; 89% non-Hispanic/Latinx). Families were randomized into either ROAR-EC or treatment as usual through developmental pediatrics and followed for 24 weeks. Assessed were metrics of feasibility, acceptability, parenting practices, caregiver empowerment, disruptive behaviors, and ADHD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that ROAR-EC was feasible to implement and acceptable to caregivers. Repeated measures ANOVAs found significant group × time interaction effects in favor of the treatment group compared to control for family empowerment, parenting practices, total behavior problems, impairment, and inattentive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the promise of brief telemedicine programs as feasible, acceptable, and likely beneficial alternatives to traditional BPTs for young children with ADHD in rural and low-resource areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547251415434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inattention and Hyperactivity Symptom Dimensions of ADHD Differentially Moderate the Relationship Between Concurrent Attention States and Affective Valence. 注意缺陷多动和注意力不集中症状维度差异调节同时注意状态与情感效价的关系。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251394173
Yudhajit Ain, Simrit Rai, Ann Galbraith, Jonas Buerkner, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna, Brandy L Callahan, Julia W Y Kam

Background: ADHD has been characterised by excessive mind wandering (MW), or thoughts unrelated to the task at hand, with recent findings indicating that ADHD is specifically associated with more unintentional, but not intentional, MW. These two types of MW are also differentially associated with affective well-being. Most existing studies in ADHD, however, mainly rely on retrospective reports of MW tendencies, which are susceptible to memory-related errors and biases. Further, most studies categorise participants based on overall levels of ADHD, instead of accounting for the spectrum and dimensional heterogeneity of ADHD, including inattention and hyperactivity symptom dimensions. Our study aimed to address the knowledge gap regarding the relationship between different types of MW and affective well-being, across different symptom dimensions of ADHD.

Methods: We used ecological momentary assessment to capture participants' momentary attention state (on-task, intentional MW, or unintentional MW) and affective valence, six times daily for 7 days. Using linear mixed-effects modelling to account for inter-individual variance, we tested whether inattention and hyperactivity symptom dimensions of ADHD differentially moderate the relationship between attention states and affective valence.

Results: We found that higher levels of inattention symptoms predicted more negative affect during intentional MW compared to on-task attention; in contrast, higher levels of hyperactivity symptoms predicted more positive affect during intentional MW compared to on-task attention.

Discussion: Together, our results indicate that intentional MW moderates opposing effects of inattention and hyperactivity ADHD symptoms on affective valence. Our findings suggest that intentional MW - and not just unintentional MW - may also play a role in affective or behavioural outcomes associated with ADHD symptomatology, and highlight the importance of considering the heterogeneity of ADHD symptomatology, as well as the distinction between intentional and unintentional MW, in future ADHD research.

背景:多动症的特征是过度的走神(MW),或者与手头任务无关的想法,最近的研究结果表明,多动症与更多的无意而非有意的走神特别相关。这两种类型的情感情感与情感幸福感的关系也不同。然而,大多数现有的ADHD研究主要依赖于对记忆倾向的回顾性报告,这很容易受到记忆相关错误和偏差的影响。此外,大多数研究根据ADHD的整体水平对参与者进行分类,而不是考虑ADHD的频谱和维度异质性,包括注意力不集中和多动症状维度。我们的研究旨在解决关于不同类型的注意力缺陷多动障碍与情感幸福感之间关系的知识差距,跨越ADHD的不同症状维度。方法:采用生态瞬时评价法,记录被试的瞬时注意状态(任务内、有意或无意的注意力)和情感效价,每天6次,持续7天。使用线性混合效应模型来解释个体间的差异,我们测试了ADHD的注意力不集中和多动症状维度是否会差异地调节注意力状态和情感效价之间的关系。结果:我们发现,与任务注意相比,在有意识的记忆记忆过程中,较高水平的注意力不集中症状预示着更多的负面影响;相比之下,与任务注意力相比,高水平的多动症状预示着在有意识的MW期间有更多的积极影响。讨论:综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,有意识的轻度注意力缺失和多动症症状对情感效价的相反影响是温和的。我们的研究结果表明,有意的MW而不仅仅是无意的MW也可能在与ADHD症状学相关的情感或行为结果中发挥作用,并强调在未来的ADHD研究中考虑ADHD症状学的异质性以及有意和无意MW之间的区别的重要性。
{"title":"Inattention and Hyperactivity Symptom Dimensions of ADHD Differentially Moderate the Relationship Between Concurrent Attention States and Affective Valence.","authors":"Yudhajit Ain, Simrit Rai, Ann Galbraith, Jonas Buerkner, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna, Brandy L Callahan, Julia W Y Kam","doi":"10.1177/10870547251394173","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251394173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ADHD has been characterised by excessive mind wandering (MW), or thoughts unrelated to the task at hand, with recent findings indicating that ADHD is specifically associated with more unintentional, but not intentional, MW. These two types of MW are also differentially associated with affective well-being. Most existing studies in ADHD, however, mainly rely on retrospective reports of MW tendencies, which are susceptible to memory-related errors and biases. Further, most studies categorise participants based on overall levels of ADHD, instead of accounting for the spectrum and dimensional heterogeneity of ADHD, including inattention and hyperactivity symptom dimensions. Our study aimed to address the knowledge gap regarding the relationship between different types of MW and affective well-being, across different symptom dimensions of ADHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used ecological momentary assessment to capture participants' momentary attention state (on-task, intentional MW, or unintentional MW) and affective valence, six times daily for 7 days. Using linear mixed-effects modelling to account for inter-individual variance, we tested whether inattention and hyperactivity symptom dimensions of ADHD differentially moderate the relationship between attention states and affective valence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that higher levels of inattention symptoms predicted more negative affect during intentional MW compared to on-task attention; in contrast, higher levels of hyperactivity symptoms predicted more positive affect during intentional MW compared to on-task attention.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Together, our results indicate that intentional MW moderates opposing effects of inattention and hyperactivity ADHD symptoms on affective valence. Our findings suggest that intentional MW - and not just unintentional MW - may also play a role in affective or behavioural outcomes associated with ADHD symptomatology, and highlight the importance of considering the heterogeneity of ADHD symptomatology, as well as the distinction between intentional and unintentional MW, in future ADHD research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"249-264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12779771/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
It Takes Two: Intimate Partner Violence According to Both Partners in Young Adult ADHD Couples. 需要两个:年轻成年ADHD夫妇双方的亲密伴侣暴力。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-16 DOI: 10.1177/10870547251382679
Brian T Wymbs, Christie T Pickel, Steven W Evans, Peggy M Zoccola, Ryan C Shorey, Levi M Toback

Objective: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been shown to increase the risk of young adults perpetrating and being victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, research has yet to examine the IPV experiences of both dyad members where one or both partners has ADHD, and how those experiences differ from couples including partners without ADHD.

Methods: 41 "ADHD couples" (m age = 22.7 years), where one (n = 33) or both (n = 8) dyad members had ADHD, and 28 "Non-ADHD couples" (m age = 23.4 years), where both dyad members did not have ADHD, participated. Both partners reported on the frequency they perpetrated and were victims of psychological and physical IPV.

Results: Both partners in ADHD couples reported perpetrating more psychological and physical IPV than dyad members in Non-ADHD couples. Partners in ADHD couples also reported being victims of IPV more than partners in Non-ADHD couples.

Conclusions: The risk of IPV perpetration in young adult couples with ADHD appears to be a two-way street. Research is needed to examine possible explanations for this pattern of reciprocal IPV, including mutual ADHD symptoms and related behavior (e.g., alcohol intoxication).

目的:注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)已被证明会增加年轻人实施亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)并成为受害者的风险。然而,研究还没有检查夫妻双方的IPV经历,其中一方或双方都患有多动症,以及这些经历与没有多动症的夫妇有什么不同。方法:41对“ADHD夫妇”(年龄22.7岁),其中一方(n = 33)或双方(n = 8)患有ADHD; 28对“非ADHD夫妇”(年龄23.4岁),双方均无ADHD。双方都报告了他们犯罪的频率,并且都是心理和身体上的IPV的受害者。结果:与非ADHD夫妻相比,ADHD夫妻双方都报告了更多的心理和身体上的IPV。ADHD夫妇的伴侣也比非ADHD夫妇的伴侣更容易成为IPV的受害者。结论:患有ADHD的年轻成年夫妇发生IPV的风险似乎是双向的。需要研究来检验这种相互IPV模式的可能解释,包括相互的ADHD症状和相关行为(如酒精中毒)。
{"title":"It Takes Two: Intimate Partner Violence According to Both Partners in Young Adult ADHD Couples.","authors":"Brian T Wymbs, Christie T Pickel, Steven W Evans, Peggy M Zoccola, Ryan C Shorey, Levi M Toback","doi":"10.1177/10870547251382679","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10870547251382679","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been shown to increase the risk of young adults perpetrating and being victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, research has yet to examine the IPV experiences of both dyad members where one or both partners has ADHD, and how those experiences differ from couples including partners without ADHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>41 \"ADHD couples\" (<i>m</i> age = 22.7 years), where one (<i>n</i> = 33) or both (<i>n</i> = 8) dyad members had ADHD, and 28 \"Non-ADHD couples\" (<i>m</i> age = 23.4 years), where both dyad members did not have ADHD, participated. Both partners reported on the frequency they perpetrated and were victims of psychological and physical IPV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both partners in ADHD couples reported perpetrating more psychological and physical IPV than dyad members in Non-ADHD couples. Partners in ADHD couples also reported being victims of IPV more than partners in Non-ADHD couples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of IPV perpetration in young adult couples with ADHD appears to be a two-way street. Research is needed to examine possible explanations for this pattern of reciprocal IPV, including mutual ADHD symptoms and related behavior (e.g., alcohol intoxication).</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"222-233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145300728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Attention Disorders
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1