Background: Occupational health programs play a critical role in maintaining employee well-being, particularly for healthcare workers exposed to unique risks. Clinical pharmacists are well-positioned to address drug-related problems (DRPs) in these settings, yet their role in occupational health remains underexplored. This study assesses the frequency and resolution of DRPs following clinical pharmacist interventions among pharmacy staff in an occupational health setting.
Methods: This experimental study was conducted at the 13-Aban Pharmacotherapy Clinic of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Pharmacy staff with chronic diseases or abnormal test results was identified based on medical records. A single clinical pharmacist reviewed DRPs using the DOCUMENT classification system, provided interventions, and followed up. Recommendations were made directly to participants, and adherence to these recommendations was assessed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation tests.
Results: Among 601 medical records reviewed, 239 participants met inclusion criteria, and 139 attended pharmacotherapy visits. A total of 277 DRPs were identified, averaging 1.99 DRPs per participant. The most common DRPs were the need for preventative therapy (37.2%), untreated conditions (15.9%), and laboratory monitoring (14.8%). A total of 443 recommendations were provided to participants, with an adherence rate of 76.4%. Among those who fully adhered to the recommendations, 97.2% of DRPs were resolved. While adherence was initially higher among female participants, overall compliance rates did not significantly differ by gender.
Conclusion: Clinical pharmacist interventions effectively identified and resolved DRPs among pharmacy staff, improving medication management. These findings highlight the value of integrating clinical pharmacists into occupational health programs to enhance medication safety and adherence.
{"title":"Identification and Resolution of Drug-Related Problems by Clinical Pharmacist Interventions in an Occupational Health Setting: A Study on Pharmacy Staff","authors":"Bita Shahrami, Mahta Alimadadi, Soma Rahimi, Mona Abutalebzadeh, Soheila Tayefeh, Romina Kaveh-Ahangaran, Farhad Najmeddin, Elham Hadidi","doi":"10.1155/jcpt/5540546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jcpt/5540546","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> Occupational health programs play a critical role in maintaining employee well-being, particularly for healthcare workers exposed to unique risks. Clinical pharmacists are well-positioned to address drug-related problems (DRPs) in these settings, yet their role in occupational health remains underexplored. This study assesses the frequency and resolution of DRPs following clinical pharmacist interventions among pharmacy staff in an occupational health setting.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This experimental study was conducted at the 13-Aban Pharmacotherapy Clinic of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Pharmacy staff with chronic diseases or abnormal test results was identified based on medical records. A single clinical pharmacist reviewed DRPs using the DOCUMENT classification system, provided interventions, and followed up. Recommendations were made directly to participants, and adherence to these recommendations was assessed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation tests.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Among 601 medical records reviewed, 239 participants met inclusion criteria, and 139 attended pharmacotherapy visits. A total of 277 DRPs were identified, averaging 1.99 DRPs per participant. The most common DRPs were the need for preventative therapy (37.2%), untreated conditions (15.9%), and laboratory monitoring (14.8%). A total of 443 recommendations were provided to participants, with an adherence rate of 76.4%. Among those who fully adhered to the recommendations, 97.2% of DRPs were resolved. While adherence was initially higher among female participants, overall compliance rates did not significantly differ by gender.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Clinical pharmacist interventions effectively identified and resolved DRPs among pharmacy staff, improving medication management. These findings highlight the value of integrating clinical pharmacists into occupational health programs to enhance medication safety and adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/5540546","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144888152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andreas Riedel, Peter Ruth, Markus W. Löffler, Nicolai Stransky
Objective: Drug repurposing is a promising alternative for the development of new treatment options. During the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple repurposed drugs were tested and some became pillars of treatment and the standard of care. However, whether the benefits of drug repurposing over de novo drug development actually materialize remains an open question, especially since former analyses have been complicated by challenges to attract enough funding for late-stage clinical trials.
Methods: We conducted a systematic analysis of repurposing efforts against COVID-19 focusing on the 100 most frequently prescribed drugs in the United States including both preclinical and clinical work.
Results: In total, we identify (pre)clinical research for 42 drugs and evidence of anti-COVID-19 effects for 33 drugs. The rate of studies with positive results decreased from in vitro to animal studies to randomized clinical trials. While we find positive RCTs for 12 drugs, these trials had mostly low participant numbers and several reported endpoints of minor clinical relevance. Assessment of the methodological quality assessment indicates that preregistration, blinding, and power calculations are currently still an exception in preclinical studies. In the end, none of these drugs were recommended by treatment guidelines.
Conclusions: Our analysis underlines the large efforts undertaken to repurpose commonly prescribed drugs against COVID-19, which eventually proved futile. This finding may serve as a cautionary example for drug repurposing also for other fields of biomedicine. However, it should be noted that a limitation of this study is its focus on only the 100 most prescribed drugs in the United States, as we chose to analyze widely available and generally affordable medications.
{"title":"A Systematic Assessment of Drug Repurposing Efforts Against COVID-19: Limited Successes and Key Challenges","authors":"Andreas Riedel, Peter Ruth, Markus W. Löffler, Nicolai Stransky","doi":"10.1155/jcpt/3796111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jcpt/3796111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective:</b> Drug repurposing is a promising alternative for the development of new treatment options. During the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple repurposed drugs were tested and some became pillars of treatment and the standard of care. However, whether the benefits of drug repurposing over <i>de novo</i> drug development actually materialize remains an open question, especially since former analyses have been complicated by challenges to attract enough funding for late-stage clinical trials.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic analysis of repurposing efforts against COVID-19 focusing on the 100 most frequently prescribed drugs in the United States including both preclinical and clinical work.</p><p><b>Results:</b> In total, we identify (pre)clinical research for 42 drugs and evidence of anti-COVID-19 effects for 33 drugs. The rate of studies with positive results decreased from in vitro to animal studies to randomized clinical trials. While we find positive RCTs for 12 drugs, these trials had mostly low participant numbers and several reported endpoints of minor clinical relevance. Assessment of the methodological quality assessment indicates that preregistration, blinding, and power calculations are currently still an exception in preclinical studies. In the end, none of these drugs were recommended by treatment guidelines.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our analysis underlines the large efforts undertaken to repurpose commonly prescribed drugs against COVID-19, which eventually proved futile. This finding may serve as a cautionary example for drug repurposing also for other fields of biomedicine. However, it should be noted that a limitation of this study is its focus on only the 100 most prescribed drugs in the United States, as we chose to analyze widely available and generally affordable medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/3796111","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144814737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}