Journal of Clinical Oncology最新文献

Approximately 30%-50% of patients develop acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT), representing a major limitation of this treatment. Although corticosteroids remain the standard first-line therapy for aGVHD, up to 50% of patients become steroid-refractory (SR). REACH2 is a phase III study of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) in patients age 12 years and older with SR-aGVHD after Allo-HCT. We present the final efficacy and safety outcomes from REACH2 after 24 months of treatment. Cumulative median (range) duration of response was 167 (22-677) days with ruxolitinib and 106 (10-526) days with BAT. Median overall survival and event-free survival were 10.7 and 8.3 months for ruxolitinib, compared with 5.8 and 4.2 months, respectively, with BAT. Median failure-free survival was significantly longer with ruxolitinib than with BAT (4.86 v 1.02 months, P < .001). Similar numbers of nonrelapse mortality events were observed with ruxolitinib and BAT (72 v 71), and malignancy relapse/progression events remained low across both groups. Numerically higher chronic GVHD rates were noted with ruxolitinib than with BAT from 12 months; however, 95% confidence intervals overlapped. Safety observations were consistent with the primary analysis results. Ruxolitinib provided efficacy advantages over BAT in patients with SR-aGVHD over 24 months.

In a disease marked by racial and ethnic disparities, @khancology tells the story of a patient whose multiple myeloma diagnosis and treatment serves as a reminder of the civil liberties progress we have made and that we have more to go.

Purpose: STELLAR (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02796261) was a phase III, randomized, open-label trial of eflornithine + lomustine versus lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent grade 3 astrocytoma.

Methods: At trial initiation, eligibility criteria included: age ≥18 years, anaplastic astrocytoma (2016 WHO CNS Tumor classification [WHO CNS4]), first recurrence ≥6 months after radiation and temozolomide (TMZ), Karnofsky performance status ≥70, and no imaging findings consistent with grade 4 glioblastoma. Random assignment (1:1) was stratified by isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, age, resection extent, and geography. Patients received eflornithine (2.8 g/m² orally, every 8 hours [2 weeks on, 1 week off]) + lomustine (90 mg/m² orally, once every 6 weeks), or lomustine monotherapy (110 mg/m² once every 6 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival (OS).

Results: Among 343 patients randomly assigned across 74 sites in eight countries, there was no difference in survival between eflornithine + lomustine and lomustine monotherapy (median OS 23.4 v 20.3 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.94). Following changes in classification and grading in the 2021 WHO CNS5, a subset analysis of patients with IDH-mutant, grade 3 astrocytoma (n = 196), defined in 2024, before unblinding, showed clinically meaningful improvements in median OS with eflornithine + lomustine versus lomustine monotherapy (34.9 v 23.5 months, HR, 0.64) and median progression-free survival (PFS, 15.8 v 7.2 months, HR, 0.57). No differences were observed among patients with CNS grade 4 disease. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events of relevance were related to reversible myelosuppression (eflornithine + lomustine 42% v lomustine monotherapy 29% of patients) and hearing impairment (24% v 0%). No new safety signals were identified.

Conclusion: Clinically meaningful improvements were observed; eflornithine + lomustine doubled PFS and improved OS in patients with recurrent IDH-mutant, grade 3 astrocytoma, but not grade 4 tumors, after prior radiotherapy and TMZ, consistent with its cytostatic mechanism of action.

Purpose: Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) are curable, but patients with residual disease after therapy invariably experience progression. Ultrasensitive methods to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as minimal residual disease (MRD) may improve the determination of remission.

Methods: We integrated data from five prospective studies of frontline anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients with LBCL. Tumor-specific phased variants were identified from pretreatment samples and monitored at landmark time points. Serial plasma specimens were blindly analyzed for detectable ctDNA as MRD. MRD status was compared with conventional response criteria for prognosis of progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: We studied ctDNA-MRD in 137 patients by monitoring 409 plasma specimens over time. Detectable ctDNA rates decreased during therapy with 55% and 78% of patients achieving undetectable ctDNA after two cycles and at the end of therapy, respectively. After a median follow-up of 37 months, the 2-year PFS for patients with detectable versus undetectable ctDNA after two cycles was 67% versus 96% (P = .0025; hazard ratio [HR], 6.9) and after therapy was 29% versus 97% (P < .0001; HR, 28.7), respectively. Ninety-two (94%) patients with undetectable ctDNA at the end of therapy remained alive without progression, while 19 (68%) patients with detectable ctDNA progressed or died. MRD status at the end of therapy had greater prognostic utility than conventional lymphoma response criteria using positron emission tomography (PET) scans (HR, 3.6 for positive PET and 28.3 for detectable ctDNA).

Conclusion: Ultrasensitive ctDNA detection after frontline LBCL therapy is more prognostic than conventional radiographic response criteria. A refined definition of remission with ctDNA-MRD may improve clinical and psychological outcomes for patients with LBCL.