Can an oncologist doing shared decision making connect with patients via treatment recommendations?
Can an oncologist doing shared decision making connect with patients via treatment recommendations?
ASCO Rapid Recommendation Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only).
Purpose: Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC) remains a difficult-to-treat disease. Fluorouarcil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin (FFX) is a standard first-line therapy for mPC for patients with a favorable performance status and good organ function. In a phase I study, devimistat (CPI-613) in combination with modified FFX (mFFX) was deemed safe and exhibited promising efficacy in mPC.
Methods: The AVENGER 500 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03504423) is a global, randomized phase III trial conducted at 74 sites across six countries to investigate the efficacy and safety of devimistat in combination with mFFX (experimental arm) compared with standard-dose FFX (control arm) in treatment-naïve patients with mPC. Treatment, administered in once-every-2-weeks cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity, included intravenous devimistat at 500 mg/m2 total per day on days 1 and 3 in the experimental arm. The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS).
Results: Five hundred and twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned (266 in the experimental arm and 262 in the control arm). The median OS was 11.10 months for devimistat plus mFFX versus 11.73 months for FFX (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.18]; P = .655) and median progression-free survival was 7.8 months versus 8.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.29]; P = .94). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events with >10% frequency in the devimistat plus mFFX arm versus the FFX arm were neutropenia (29.0% v 34.5%), diarrhea (11.2% v 19.6%), hypokalemia (13.1% v 14.9%), anemia (13.9% v 13.6%), thrombocytopenia (11.6% v 13.6%), and fatigue (10.8% v 11.5%), respectively.
Conclusion: Devimistat in combination with mFFX did not improve long- and short-term mPC patient outcomes compared with standard FFX. There were no new toxicity signals with the addition of devimistat.
Purpose: Ewing Sarcoma (ES), a rare cancer with a pathognomonic translocation resulting in the Ewing sarcoma gene (EWS)::FLI1 oncoprotein, has a poor prognosis in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. Tokalas (TK)216 was designed to bind EWS::FLI1 proteins directly, disrupt protein-protein interactions, and inhibit transcription factor function. TK216 plus vincristine showed synergistic activity in preclinical tumor models. To our knowledge, we report the results of a first-in-class, first-in-human phase I/II trial of TK216 in R/R ES.
Patients and methods: TK216 was administered intravenously as a continuous infusion to patients with R/R ES in 11 cohorts. The dosing duration of 7 days was later extended to 10, 14, and 28 days. Vincristine could be added on day 1 after cycle 2, per investigators' choice. The trial used a 3 + 3 design with an expansion cohort at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D).
Results: A total of 85 patients with a median age of 27 years (range, 11-77) were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose for the 14-day infusion of TK216, 200 mg/m2 once daily, was determined in cohort 9 and selected as the RP2D. The median previous number of systemic therapies regimens was three (range, 1-10). The most frequent-related adverse events in patients treated at the RP2D included neutropenia (44.7%), anemia (29.4%), leukopenia (29.4%), febrile neutropenia (15.3%), thrombocytopenia (11.8%), and infections (17.6%). In cohorts 9 and 10, two patients had a complete response, one had a partial response, and 14 had stable disease; the 6-month progression-free survival was 11.9%. There were no responses among the eight patients in cohort 11.
Conclusion: TK216 administered as 14-day continuous infusion with or without vincristine was well tolerated and showed limited activity at the RP2D in R/R ES.
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The APHINITY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01358877) previously demonstrated that pertuzumab added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for patients with early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC). Here, we report the preplanned third interim analysis of overall survival (OS) and a descriptive updated iDFS analysis with 8.4 years of median follow-up of 4,804 patients in the intent-to-treat population. The 8-year OS was 92.7% in the pertuzumab versus 92.0% in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.02]; P = .078, above the 0.006 significance threshold). The HR was 0.80 [95% CI 0.63 to 1.00] in the node-positive cohort and 0.99 [95% CI, 0.64 to 1.55] in the node-negative cohort. Updated results of 8-year iDFS in the node-positive cohort showed an absolute improvement of 4.9% favoring pertuzumab (86.1% v 81.2%; HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87]). The node-negative cohort did well without adding pertuzumab (8-year iDFS and OS in the placebo group were 93.3% and 96.4%, respectively). The iDFS benefit was seen in the hormone receptor-negative (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.64 to 1.06]) and HR+ cohorts (HR of 0.75 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.92]). Despite improvement in overall iDFS, the addition of pertuzumab did not improve OS at this third interim analysis.
Purpose: Retrospective studies suggest that immunosuppressive treatment of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) impairs survival in patients with melanoma who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we study this association across tumor types using data from six international phase II/III registrational trials.
Methods: A post hoc analysis was performed on individual patient data from the anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) + anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (anti-CTLA-4) treatment arms of six clinical trials (CheckMate-067, -142, -214, -648, -743, and -9LA). Among patients who received systemic immunosuppression for treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), associations of peak and cumulative corticosteroid dose, and use of second-line immunosuppression with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using multilevel Cox regression with adjustment for age and sex.
Results: Of the 1,959 patients who received anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 therapy, 834 patients who were treated with immunosuppression for trAEs were included. Eight hundred and thirty-two patients (100%) received corticosteroids and 81 patients (10%) received second-line immunosuppressants. High corticosteroid peak dose was associated with worse PFS: adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj), 1.15 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.29) for 1 versus 0.5 mg/kg prednisolone and HRadj, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.96) for 2 versus 0.5 mg/kg. Similar effects were observed for OS: HRadj, 1.21 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.39) and HRadj, 1.66 (95% CI, 1.17 to 2.37) for 1 and 2 versus 0.5 mg/kg, respectively. Cumulative corticosteroid dose was not associated with survival. HRadj of use of second-line immunosuppression was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.68) for PFS and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.77) for OS.
Conclusion: Higher corticosteroid peak dose for trAEs is associated with worse survival across tumor types, while cumulative dose is not. Too few patients received second-line immunosuppressants to confirm or reject an association with survival. These data argue for a reconsideration of irAE management approaches, starting with lower corticosteroid dose whenever feasible.
Purpose: Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), a rare gynecologic malignancy, has been rising in incidence. Molecular classification on the basis of human papilloma virus (HPV) and tumor protein 53 (p53) status has identified three clinically distinct subtypes, but we still treat all VSCCs the same. Here, we review molecular classification of VSCC, outline treatment landscape, and highlight potential for targeted therapies in advanced VSCC.
Design: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on treatment of advanced VSCC with particular focus on the implications of molecular stratification on the basis of HPV and p53 status on the treatment landscape of advanced VSCC.
Results: Incorporation of HPV and p53 status in locoregional treatment decision making has the potential to advise (de)escalation strategies. The role of immunotherapy, alone and in combination, requires further exploration particularly earlier in the course of the disease. In advanced stages, potential for targeted therapies in VSCCs include inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor, endothelial growth factor receptor, cell cycle, and DNA damage response, particularly in HPV-negative (HPV-) VSCCs. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3 kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway is attractive in HPV-positive and HPV-/p53 wildtype VSCCs. Trials incorporating antibody-drug conjugates (eg, trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) should be considered, and basket trials in perineal squamous cell cancers are warranted. Preclinical models are limited and should be expanded to inform trial design.
Conclusion: Like other rare cancers, vulvar cancer lags behind in the identification and optimization of precision medicine strategies. Molecular-based preclinical models and rationally designed clinical trials, incorporating high-quality translational studies, are urgently required. These trials will require international collaboration to ensure feasibility and improvement of outcomes for women diagnosed with this disease.
Purpose: As part of the 100,000 Genomes Project, we set out to assess the potential viability and clinical impact of reporting genetic variants associated with drug-induced toxicity for patients with cancer recruited for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as part of a genomic medicine service.
Methods: Germline WGS from 76,805 participants was analyzed for pharmacogenetic (PGx) variants in four genes (DPYD, NUDT15, TPMT, UGT1A1) associated with toxicity induced by five drugs used in cancer treatment (capecitabine, fluorouracil, mercaptopurine, thioguanine, irinotecan). Linking genomic data with prescribing and hospital incidence records, a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) was performed to identify whether phenotypes indicative of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were enriched in drug-exposed individuals with the relevant PGx variants. In a subset of 7,081 patients with cancer, DPYD variants were reported back to clinicians and outcomes were collected.
Results: We identified clinically relevant PGx variants across the four genes in 62.7% of participants in our cohort. Extending this to annual prescription numbers in England for the drugs affected by these PGx variants, approximately 14,540 patients per year could potentially benefit from a reduced dose or alternative drug to reduce the risk of ADRs. Validating PGx associations in a real-world data set, we found a significant association between PGx variants in DPYD and toxicity-related phenotypes in patients treated with capecitabine or fluorouracil. Reported DPYD variants were deemed informative for clinical decision making in a majority of cases.
Conclusion: Reporting PGx variants from germline WGS relevant to patients with cancer alongside primary findings related to their cancer can be clinically informative, informing prescribing to reduce the risk of ADRs. Extending the range of actionable variants to those found in patients of non-European ancestry is important and will extend the potential clinical impact.
Purpose: The clinical efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) followed by selective nonoperative management (NOM) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) was examined in the Organ Preservation for Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPRA) trial. We investigated the cost and quality-of-life implications of adopting this treatment approach.
Methods: We analyzed clinical, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes for TNT with selective NOM in comparison with chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-surgery-adjuvant chemotherapy (standard of care [SOC]) using data from OPRA, prospective cohorts, and published studies. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated over varying willingness-to-pay thresholds, and sensitivity analyses evaluated cost-effectiveness for different surgical contexts and SOC variants as well as a 10-year time horizon.
Results: SOC was dominated by TNT with selective NOM in the base case analysis. TNT in which CRT was followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CNCT) was the least costly at $89,712 in Medicare proportionate US dollars (MP$), followed by TNT in which induction chemotherapy was followed by CRT (INCT) at MP$90,259 and SOC at MP$98,755. INCT was the preferred strategy, with 4.56 quality-adjusted life years, followed by CNCT at 4.42 and SOC at 4.29. TNT with selective NOM dominated SOC in all sensitivity analyses except when SOC omitted adjuvant chemotherapy without an impact on disease-free survival. CNCT was more cost effective than SOC when the proportion of patients entering NOM after TNT was ≥22% or ≥43%, for SOC with and without adjuvant therapy, both well below the rates seen in OPRA.
Conclusion: TNT with selective NOM is cost effective. The cost-effectiveness of CNCT with NOM relative to SOC is dependent on CNCT being made available to a sufficiently large proportion of patients with LARC. Additional analyses are needed to validate these findings from a societal perspective and in the context of other emerging treatment paradigms for LARC.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：