首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Clinical Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Delta-Like Ligand 3 Expression Across Lung Neuroendocrine Subtypes: Interpreting Response in Small Cell Lung Cancer and Beyond. δ样配体3在肺神经内分泌亚型中的表达:解释小细胞肺癌及其他类型的反应。
IF 45.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-01894
Yitian Chen,Li Liu,Yang Ming,Ligang Chen
{"title":"Delta-Like Ligand 3 Expression Across Lung Neuroendocrine Subtypes: Interpreting Response in Small Cell Lung Cancer and Beyond.","authors":"Yitian Chen,Li Liu,Yang Ming,Ligang Chen","doi":"10.1200/jco-25-01894","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-01894","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"31 1","pages":"JCO2501894"},"PeriodicalIF":45.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bridging the Gap: Advancing First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer. 弥合差距:推进转移性人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌患者的一线治疗
IF 45.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-02942
Carmine Valenza,Nancy A Nixon,Winson Y Cheung,Sara M Tolaney
{"title":"Bridging the Gap: Advancing First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer.","authors":"Carmine Valenza,Nancy A Nixon,Winson Y Cheung,Sara M Tolaney","doi":"10.1200/jco-25-02942","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-02942","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"66 1","pages":"JCO2502942"},"PeriodicalIF":45.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Marking Techniques for Target Lymph Nodes in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy in the AXSANA/EUBREAST-03/AGO-B-053 Study. AXSANA/EUBREAST-03/AGO-B-053研究中淋巴结阳性乳腺癌新辅助治疗的靶淋巴结标记技术
IF 45.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-01921
Maggie Banys-Paluchowski,Steffi Hartmann,Jana de Boniface,Oreste D Gentilini,Nina Ditsch,Elmar Stickeler,Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak,Michael Hauptmann,Jennifer Schroth,Marc Thill,Rosa di Micco,Markus Hahn,Dawid Murawa,Isabel T Rubio,David Pinto,Michalis Kontos,Laura Niinikoski,Maria Luisa Gasparri,Helidon Nina,Lia P Rebaza,Sarah Fröhlich,Esther Schmidt,Kristina Wihlfahrt,Tomasz Berger,Timo Basali,Franziska Ruf,Angelika Rief,Eduard-Alexandru Bonci,Florentia Peintinger,Ellen Schlichting,Hagigat Valiyeva Qanimat,Marian Vanhoeij,Geeta Kadayaprath,Lukas Dostalek,Ashutosh Kothari,Andraz Perhavec,Tsvetomir Ivanov,Douglas Zippel,Beata Adamczyk,Mauro Porpiglia,Günay M Gürleyik,Michael Untch,Michael P Lux,Katharina Jursik,Hans-Christian Kolberg,Toralf Reimer,Nikolas Tauber,Achim Rody,Zoltan Matrai,Natalia Krawczyk,Sarun Thongvitokomarn,Thorsten Kühn
PURPOSESurgical axillary staging in patients with node-positive breast cancer (BC) who converted to clinical node negativity through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed significantly in recent years. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) and target lymph node (TLN) biopsy (TLNB) became increasingly popular. However, data comparing marking techniques for the TLN are limited. Here, we evaluate marking techniques in the largest prospective cohort worldwide.MATERIALS AND METHODSAmong patients from the ongoing prospective multicenter AXSANA (EUBREAST-03) study who received TLN marking and TAD/TLNB, we evaluated different marking methods with respect to detection and removal rates and clinical performance.RESULTSUntil January 6, 2025, 6,129 patients from 26 countries were enrolled. Of these patients, 2,596 had ≥1 TLN marked before NACT and completed surgery; 13.3% of the patients had ≥4 suspicious nodes at diagnosis. Pre-NACT TLN marking used a clip in 2,003 patients (77.2%), magnetic seed in 287 (11.1%), carbon ink in 192 (7.4%), radar marker in 119 (4.6%), radioactive seed in 18 (0.7%), radiofrequency identification device (RFID) in 12 (0.5%), or other methods in two (0.1%). One TLN was marked in 2,427 patients (93.5%), two TLNs in 138 (5.3%), and ≥3 in 27 patients (1%). Targeted removal of the TLN was planned in 2,100 patients (80.9%; TAD in 2,076 [80.0%] and TLNB in 24 [0.9%]). The TLN was detected and removed by TAD/TLNB in 1,915 patients (91.2%). TLN detection rate was the highest in patients whose TLNs were marked pre-NACT with markers suitable for probe-guided detection (96.6%; radioactive seed: 100%, magnetic seed: 96.9%, radar marker: 96.1%, RFID: 90%), followed by carbon ink (94.9%) and clip (89.6%; P < .001).CONCLUSIONThis large prospective analysis of patients with initially clinically node-positive BC receiving NACT demonstrates that probe-guided detection markers used to mark metastatic nodes before NACT provide superior detection rates.
目的:近年来,淋巴结阳性乳腺癌(BC)患者通过新辅助化疗(NACT)转化为临床淋巴结阴性的手术腋窝分期发生了显著变化。靶向腋窝清扫(TAD)和靶淋巴结(TLN)活检(TLNB)越来越受欢迎。然而,比较TLN标记技术的数据是有限的。在这里,我们在全球最大的前瞻性队列中评估标记技术。材料与方法在正在进行的前瞻性多中心AXSANA (EUBREAST-03)研究中接受TLN标记和TAD/TLNB的患者中,我们评估了不同的标记方法在检出率和清除率以及临床表现方面的差异。截至2025年1月6日,共有来自26个国家的6129名患者入组。在这些患者中,2596例患者在NACT前有≥1个TLN标记并完成手术;13.3%的患者诊断时可疑淋巴结≥4个。nact前TLN标记使用夹子2003例(77.2%),磁种子287例(11.1%),碳墨水192例(7.4%),雷达标记119例(4.6%),放射性种子18例(0.7%),射频识别装置(RFID) 12例(0.5%),或其他方法2例(0.1%)。2427例(93.5%)患者有1个TLN, 138例(5.3%)患者有2个TLN, 27例(1%)患者有≥3个TLN。2100例患者计划进行TLN的靶向切除(80.9%;TAD为2076例[80.0%],TLNB为24例[0.9%])。1915例(91.2%)患者通过TAD/TLNB检测并切除了TLN。TLN在nact前用适合探针引导检测的标记物标记的患者中检出率最高(96.6%),放射性种子:100%,磁性种子:96.9%,雷达标记:96.1%,RFID: 90%),其次是碳墨(94.9%)和夹子(89.6%,P < 0.001)。结论:这项对最初临床淋巴结阳性BC患者接受NACT的大型前瞻性分析表明,在NACT之前用于标记转移淋巴结的探针引导检测标志物具有更高的检出率。
{"title":"Marking Techniques for Target Lymph Nodes in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy in the AXSANA/EUBREAST-03/AGO-B-053 Study.","authors":"Maggie Banys-Paluchowski,Steffi Hartmann,Jana de Boniface,Oreste D Gentilini,Nina Ditsch,Elmar Stickeler,Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak,Michael Hauptmann,Jennifer Schroth,Marc Thill,Rosa di Micco,Markus Hahn,Dawid Murawa,Isabel T Rubio,David Pinto,Michalis Kontos,Laura Niinikoski,Maria Luisa Gasparri,Helidon Nina,Lia P Rebaza,Sarah Fröhlich,Esther Schmidt,Kristina Wihlfahrt,Tomasz Berger,Timo Basali,Franziska Ruf,Angelika Rief,Eduard-Alexandru Bonci,Florentia Peintinger,Ellen Schlichting,Hagigat Valiyeva Qanimat,Marian Vanhoeij,Geeta Kadayaprath,Lukas Dostalek,Ashutosh Kothari,Andraz Perhavec,Tsvetomir Ivanov,Douglas Zippel,Beata Adamczyk,Mauro Porpiglia,Günay M Gürleyik,Michael Untch,Michael P Lux,Katharina Jursik,Hans-Christian Kolberg,Toralf Reimer,Nikolas Tauber,Achim Rody,Zoltan Matrai,Natalia Krawczyk,Sarun Thongvitokomarn,Thorsten Kühn","doi":"10.1200/jco-25-01921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-01921","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSESurgical axillary staging in patients with node-positive breast cancer (BC) who converted to clinical node negativity through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed significantly in recent years. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) and target lymph node (TLN) biopsy (TLNB) became increasingly popular. However, data comparing marking techniques for the TLN are limited. Here, we evaluate marking techniques in the largest prospective cohort worldwide.MATERIALS AND METHODSAmong patients from the ongoing prospective multicenter AXSANA (EUBREAST-03) study who received TLN marking and TAD/TLNB, we evaluated different marking methods with respect to detection and removal rates and clinical performance.RESULTSUntil January 6, 2025, 6,129 patients from 26 countries were enrolled. Of these patients, 2,596 had ≥1 TLN marked before NACT and completed surgery; 13.3% of the patients had ≥4 suspicious nodes at diagnosis. Pre-NACT TLN marking used a clip in 2,003 patients (77.2%), magnetic seed in 287 (11.1%), carbon ink in 192 (7.4%), radar marker in 119 (4.6%), radioactive seed in 18 (0.7%), radiofrequency identification device (RFID) in 12 (0.5%), or other methods in two (0.1%). One TLN was marked in 2,427 patients (93.5%), two TLNs in 138 (5.3%), and ≥3 in 27 patients (1%). Targeted removal of the TLN was planned in 2,100 patients (80.9%; TAD in 2,076 [80.0%] and TLNB in 24 [0.9%]). The TLN was detected and removed by TAD/TLNB in 1,915 patients (91.2%). TLN detection rate was the highest in patients whose TLNs were marked pre-NACT with markers suitable for probe-guided detection (96.6%; radioactive seed: 100%, magnetic seed: 96.9%, radar marker: 96.1%, RFID: 90%), followed by carbon ink (94.9%) and clip (89.6%; P < .001).CONCLUSIONThis large prospective analysis of patients with initially clinically node-positive BC receiving NACT demonstrates that probe-guided detection markers used to mark metastatic nodes before NACT provide superior detection rates.","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"101 1","pages":"JCO2501921"},"PeriodicalIF":45.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146015358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is It Time to Move Beyond Graft-Versus-Host Disease-Free, Relapse-Free Survival as a Primary End Point in Clinical Trials for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation? 是时候将移植物抗宿主病、无复发生存期作为造血细胞移植临床试验的主要终点了吗?
IF 45.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-02130
Amar H Kelkar,Gregory A Abel,Corey S Cutler,Stephanie J Lee,Robert J Soiffer
{"title":"Is It Time to Move Beyond Graft-Versus-Host Disease-Free, Relapse-Free Survival as a Primary End Point in Clinical Trials for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation?","authors":"Amar H Kelkar,Gregory A Abel,Corey S Cutler,Stephanie J Lee,Robert J Soiffer","doi":"10.1200/jco-25-02130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-02130","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"58 1","pages":"JCO2502130"},"PeriodicalIF":45.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146015356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is Unmutated IgG1 a Wrong Choice for Therapeutic Antibodies Targeting Immune Checkpoints? Lessons From the Clinical Failures of the First Anti-TIGIT Antibodies. 未突变的IgG1是针对免疫检查点的治疗性抗体的错误选择吗?第一批抗tigit抗体临床失败的经验教训。
IF 45.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-01930
Pierre Boulard,Hervé Watier,Marion Ferreira
{"title":"Is Unmutated IgG1 a Wrong Choice for Therapeutic Antibodies Targeting Immune Checkpoints? Lessons From the Clinical Failures of the First Anti-TIGIT Antibodies.","authors":"Pierre Boulard,Hervé Watier,Marion Ferreira","doi":"10.1200/jco-25-01930","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-01930","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"95 1","pages":"JCO2501930"},"PeriodicalIF":45.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146015361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Randomized Phase II/III Trial Comparing Hepatectomy, Followed by mFOLFOX6 With Hepatectomy Alone for Liver Metastasis From Colorectal Cancer: Long-Term Results of JCOG0603. 随机II/III期试验比较肝切除术后mFOLFOX6与单独肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移:JCOG0603的长期结果
IF 41.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-01231
Yukihide Kanemitsu, Yasuhiro Shimizu, Junki Mizusawa, Yoshitaka Inaba, Shunsuke Tsukamoto, Atsuo Takashima, Masayuki Ohue, Koji Komori, Akio Shiomi, Manabu Shiozawa, Yusuke Suwa, Takeshi Suto, Yusuke Kinugasa, Yasumasa Takii, Hiroyuki Bando, Takaya Kobatake, Masafumi Inomata, Yasuhiro Shimada, Hiroshi Katayama, Haruhiko Fukuda

JCOG0603 demonstrated improved disease-free survival (DFS) with adjuvant mFOLFOX6 after hepatectomy compared with hepatectomy alone in colorectal liver-only metastasis (CRLM), but the overall survival (OS) data were immature. Here, we report OS after long-term follow-up. Eligible patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma and an unlimited number of liver metastases were randomized to adjuvant mFOLFOX6 or hepatectomy alone. DFS was the primary endpoint, and OS was a secondary endpoint. Between March 2007 and January 2019, 151 and 149 patients were randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy and hepatectomy alone, respectively. At a median follow-up of 7.7 years for disease-free surviving patients, 54 (35.8%) and 51 (34.2%) patients had died in the respective arms, (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.73 to 1.57]). Five-year OS was 73.4% (95% CI, 65.5 to 79.7) and 80.1% (95% CI, 72.6 to 85.7) and 7-year OS was 69.4% (95% CI, 61.2 to 76.2) and 72.4% (95% CI, 64.2 to 79.1), respectively. One patient in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm possibly died of protocol treatment-related toxicity, and one in the hepatectomy-alone arm died of post-protocol treatment complications. Five-year DFS was respectively 49.7% (95% CI, 41.5 to 57.3) and 40.5% (95% CI, 32.5 to 48.3) in the adjuvant chemotherapy and hepatectomy-alone arms (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97]). Long-term OS did not differ with adjuvant mFOLFOX6 compared with hepatectomy alone in resectable CRLM. Adjuvant mFOLFOX6 may delay recurrence but did not improve long-term survival.

JCOG0603在结肠直肠仅肝转移(CRLM)中,与单独肝切除术相比,肝切除术后佐剂mFOLFOX6可改善无病生存(DFS),但总生存(OS)数据尚不成熟。在这里,我们报告长期随访后的OS。符合条件的结直肠腺癌患者和无限数量的肝转移患者被随机分配到辅助mFOLFOX6或单独肝切除术。DFS为主要终点,OS为次要终点。在2007年3月至2019年1月期间,151名和149名患者分别随机接受辅助化疗和单纯肝切除术。在中位随访7.7年的无病存活患者中,分别有54例(35.8%)和51例(34.2%)患者在各自的组中死亡(风险比[HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.73至1.57])。5年OS分别为73.4% (95% CI, 65.5 ~ 79.7)和80.1% (95% CI, 72.6 ~ 85.7), 7年OS分别为69.4% (95% CI, 61.2 ~ 76.2)和72.4% (95% CI, 64.2 ~ 79.1)。辅助化疗组的1例患者可能死于方案治疗相关的毒性,单独肝切除术组的1例患者死于方案治疗后并发症。辅助化疗组和单独肝切除术组的5年DFS分别为49.7% (95% CI, 41.5 - 57.3)和40.5% (95% CI, 32.5 - 48.3) (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 - 0.97])。在可切除的CRLM中,与单独肝切除术相比,辅助mFOLFOX6的长期OS无差异。辅助mFOLFOX6可能延迟复发,但不能改善长期生存。
{"title":"Randomized Phase II/III Trial Comparing Hepatectomy, Followed by mFOLFOX6 With Hepatectomy Alone for Liver Metastasis From Colorectal Cancer: Long-Term Results of JCOG0603.","authors":"Yukihide Kanemitsu, Yasuhiro Shimizu, Junki Mizusawa, Yoshitaka Inaba, Shunsuke Tsukamoto, Atsuo Takashima, Masayuki Ohue, Koji Komori, Akio Shiomi, Manabu Shiozawa, Yusuke Suwa, Takeshi Suto, Yusuke Kinugasa, Yasumasa Takii, Hiroyuki Bando, Takaya Kobatake, Masafumi Inomata, Yasuhiro Shimada, Hiroshi Katayama, Haruhiko Fukuda","doi":"10.1200/JCO-25-01231","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-01231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>JCOG0603 demonstrated improved disease-free survival (DFS) with adjuvant mFOLFOX6 after hepatectomy compared with hepatectomy alone in colorectal liver-only metastasis (CRLM), but the overall survival (OS) data were immature. Here, we report OS after long-term follow-up. Eligible patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma and an unlimited number of liver metastases were randomized to adjuvant mFOLFOX6 or hepatectomy alone. DFS was the primary endpoint, and OS was a secondary endpoint. Between March 2007 and January 2019, 151 and 149 patients were randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy and hepatectomy alone, respectively. At a median follow-up of 7.7 years for disease-free surviving patients, 54 (35.8%) and 51 (34.2%) patients had died in the respective arms, (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.73 to 1.57]). Five-year OS was 73.4% (95% CI, 65.5 to 79.7) and 80.1% (95% CI, 72.6 to 85.7) and 7-year OS was 69.4% (95% CI, 61.2 to 76.2) and 72.4% (95% CI, 64.2 to 79.1), respectively. One patient in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm possibly died of protocol treatment-related toxicity, and one in the hepatectomy-alone arm died of post-protocol treatment complications. Five-year DFS was respectively 49.7% (95% CI, 41.5 to 57.3) and 40.5% (95% CI, 32.5 to 48.3) in the adjuvant chemotherapy and hepatectomy-alone arms (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97]). Long-term OS did not differ with adjuvant mFOLFOX6 compared with hepatectomy alone in resectable CRLM. Adjuvant mFOLFOX6 may delay recurrence but did not improve long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2501231"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146018670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Limitations in Study Design and Stratification in Phase II Stereotactic Radiosurgery Trial for Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases. 小细胞肺癌脑转移的II期立体定向放射外科试验研究设计和分层的局限性。
IF 45.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-01729
Orhun Akdogan,Kubra Canaslan,Buket Hamitoglu,Ozan Yazici,Osman Sutcuoglu
{"title":"Limitations in Study Design and Stratification in Phase II Stereotactic Radiosurgery Trial for Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases.","authors":"Orhun Akdogan,Kubra Canaslan,Buket Hamitoglu,Ozan Yazici,Osman Sutcuoglu","doi":"10.1200/jco-25-01729","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-01729","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"63 1","pages":"JCO2501729"},"PeriodicalIF":45.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146005374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to: From Thresholds to Tumor Sidedness: Reframing Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Colorectal Cancer. 回复:从阈值到肿瘤侧性:在结直肠癌中重构人表皮生长因子受体2。
IF 45.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-02817
Marco Maria Germani,Beatrice Borelli,Chiara Cremolini
{"title":"Reply to: From Thresholds to Tumor Sidedness: Reframing Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Marco Maria Germani,Beatrice Borelli,Chiara Cremolini","doi":"10.1200/jco-25-02817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-02817","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"52 1","pages":"JCO2502817"},"PeriodicalIF":45.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146005375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to: Optimizing Control Arms in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Clinical Trials: The BRUIN-CLL-321 Trial. 回复:优化慢性淋巴细胞白血病临床试验的对照臂:BRUIN-CLL-321试验。
IF 41.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 Epub Date: 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-02231
Jeff P Sharman, Bin Liu, Denise Y Wang, Ching Ching Leow, Paul M Barr
{"title":"Reply to: Optimizing Control Arms in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Clinical Trials: The BRUIN-CLL-321 Trial.","authors":"Jeff P Sharman, Bin Liu, Denise Y Wang, Ching Ching Leow, Paul M Barr","doi":"10.1200/JCO-25-02231","DOIUrl":"10.1200/JCO-25-02231","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"256-257"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12794705/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145573744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systemic Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2026.1. 转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的全身治疗:ASCO生活指南,2026.1版
IF 45.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-02693
Mary-Ellen Taplin,Irbaz Bin Riaz,R Bryan Rumble,Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi,Thomas A Hope,Mariane Fontes Dias,Huan He,Sebastien J Hotte,Hamid Emamekhoo,M Hassan Murad,Paul Celano,Terry M Kungel,Steve Hentzen,Michael Thomas Serzan,Rahul A Parikh
Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating clinician and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2). Updates are published regularly and can be found at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.
生活指南是为选定的主题领域制定的,证据迅速发展,促使推荐的临床实践频繁变化。生活指南由一个常设专家小组定期更新,该小组系统地持续审查卫生文献,如ASCO指南方法手册中所述。ASCO生活指南遵循ASCO临床实践指南利益冲突政策实施。生活指南和更新不能取代临床医生的独立专业判断,也不能解释患者之间的个体差异。免责声明和其他重要信息见附录(附录1和附录2)。更新定期发布,可在www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines上找到。
{"title":"Systemic Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2026.1.","authors":"Mary-Ellen Taplin,Irbaz Bin Riaz,R Bryan Rumble,Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi,Thomas A Hope,Mariane Fontes Dias,Huan He,Sebastien J Hotte,Hamid Emamekhoo,M Hassan Murad,Paul Celano,Terry M Kungel,Steve Hentzen,Michael Thomas Serzan,Rahul A Parikh","doi":"10.1200/jco-25-02693","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-02693","url":null,"abstract":"Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating clinician and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2). Updates are published regularly and can be found at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"64 1","pages":"JCO2502693"},"PeriodicalIF":45.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146005376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1