Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-25DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-00991
Trisha K Paul
{"title":"Are You Bereaved?","authors":"Trisha K Paul","doi":"10.1200/JCO-25-00991","DOIUrl":"10.1200/JCO-25-00991","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"66-67"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145604448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-21DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-02336
Rina K Yadav, Kathy D Miller
{"title":"Carboplatin for Premenopausal Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Time to Rethink the Neoadjuvant Standard?","authors":"Rina K Yadav, Kathy D Miller","doi":"10.1200/JCO-25-02336","DOIUrl":"10.1200/JCO-25-02336","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145573715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-02667
Franck Morschhauser, Gilles Salles, Laurie H Sehn, Alex F Herrera, Jonathan W Friedberg, Marek Trněný, Georg Lenz, Jeff P Sharman, Charles Herbaux, John M Burke, Matthew Matasar, Graham P Collins, Neha Mehta-Shah, Lucie Oberic, Adrien Chauchet, Wojciech Jurczak, Yuqin Song, Antonio Pinto, Shinya Rai, Koji Izutsu, Richard Greil, Larysa Mykhalska, Juan M Bergua-Burgués, Matthew C Cheung, Ho-Jin Shin, Greg Hapgood, Eduardo Munhoz, Pau Abrisqueta, Jyh-Pyng Gau, Yanwen Jiang, Bruce McCall, Saibah Chohan, Matthew Sugidono, Mark Yan, Connie Lee Batlevi, Hervé Tilly, Christopher R Flowers
{"title":"Erratum: Five-Year Outcomes of the POLARIX Study Comparing Pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.","authors":"Franck Morschhauser, Gilles Salles, Laurie H Sehn, Alex F Herrera, Jonathan W Friedberg, Marek Trněný, Georg Lenz, Jeff P Sharman, Charles Herbaux, John M Burke, Matthew Matasar, Graham P Collins, Neha Mehta-Shah, Lucie Oberic, Adrien Chauchet, Wojciech Jurczak, Yuqin Song, Antonio Pinto, Shinya Rai, Koji Izutsu, Richard Greil, Larysa Mykhalska, Juan M Bergua-Burgués, Matthew C Cheung, Ho-Jin Shin, Greg Hapgood, Eduardo Munhoz, Pau Abrisqueta, Jyh-Pyng Gau, Yanwen Jiang, Bruce McCall, Saibah Chohan, Matthew Sugidono, Mark Yan, Connie Lee Batlevi, Hervé Tilly, Christopher R Flowers","doi":"10.1200/JCO-25-02667","DOIUrl":"10.1200/JCO-25-02667","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145564276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-21DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-01649
Kathryn H Schmitz, Jennifer A Ligibel
{"title":"If Exercise Were a Pill, We'd All Prescribe It to Patients With Cancer. But It's Not.","authors":"Kathryn H Schmitz, Jennifer A Ligibel","doi":"10.1200/JCO-25-01649","DOIUrl":"10.1200/JCO-25-01649","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145573699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-13DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-01841
Pau Montesinos, Rebeca Rodríguez-Veiga, Juan Miguel Bergua, Jesús Lorenzo Algarra Algarra, Carmen Botella, Eduardo Rodríguez-Arbolí, Teresa Bernal, Mar Tormo, Maria Calbacho, Olga Salamero, Josefina Serrano, Victor Noriega, Juan Antonio López-López, Susana Vives, Jose Luis López-Lorenzo, Mercedes Colorado, Maria-Belén Vidriales, Raimundo García Boyero, Maria Teresa Olave, Pilar Herrera Puente, Olga Arce, Manuel Barrios, Maria Jose Sayas, Marta Polo, Maria Isabel Gómez-Roncero, Eva Barragán, Rosa Ayala, Carmen Chillón, Maria José Calasanz, Bruno Paiva, Blanca Boluda, Ignacio Casas-Avilés, Pilar Lloret-Madrid, Maria-José Sánchez, Carlos Rodríguez-Medina, Laida Cuevas, José Ángel Raposo-Puglia, M Carmen Mateos, Matxalen Olivares, Carmen Martínez-Chamorro, Natalia Alonso, Sandra Suárez, Irene Sánchez-Vadillo, María Solé Rodríguez, Bernardo Javier González, Antonio Martínez-Francés, Rebeca Cuello, Alfonso Fernández, David Martínez-Cuadrón, Jorge Labrador
Purpose: Quizartinib, an oral, selective, second-generation, type-II FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor with high binding affinity to internal tandem duplication (ITD) and wild-type (WT) FLT3, has shown early clinical activity as monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-ITD-negative AML. The phase III QuANTUM-First trial showed that quizartinib significantly prolonged survival versus placebo when added to standard chemotherapy, followed by single-agent maintenance, in patients with newly diagnosed (ND) FLT3-ITD-positive AML. We investigated the safety and efficacy of quizartinib in patients with ND FLT3-ITD-negative AML.
Methods: The phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled QUIWI trial enrolled patients age 18-70 years with ND FLT3-ITD-negative (mutant-to-WT allelic ratio <0.03) AML. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy combined with either quizartinib 60 mg once daily or placebo, followed by single-agent maintenance with quizartinib or placebo. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety.
Results: Overall, 273 patients were randomly assigned to quizartinib (n = 180) or placebo (n = 93). At data cutoff, median EFS was 20.4 months and 9.9 months in the quizartinib and placebo arms, respectively (P = .046). Median OS was not reached and 29.3 months in the quizartinib and placebo arms, respectively (P = .012); 3-year OS rates were 60.8% and 45.7%. The most frequently reported adverse events (any grade) were fever, rash, diarrhea, and mucositis.
Conclusion: The addition of quizartinib to standard chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer EFS and OS than placebo in patients with ND FLT3-ITD-negative AML.
{"title":"Quizartinib for Newly Diagnosed <i>FLT3</i>-Internal Tandem Duplication-Negative AML: The Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II QUIWI Study.","authors":"Pau Montesinos, Rebeca Rodríguez-Veiga, Juan Miguel Bergua, Jesús Lorenzo Algarra Algarra, Carmen Botella, Eduardo Rodríguez-Arbolí, Teresa Bernal, Mar Tormo, Maria Calbacho, Olga Salamero, Josefina Serrano, Victor Noriega, Juan Antonio López-López, Susana Vives, Jose Luis López-Lorenzo, Mercedes Colorado, Maria-Belén Vidriales, Raimundo García Boyero, Maria Teresa Olave, Pilar Herrera Puente, Olga Arce, Manuel Barrios, Maria Jose Sayas, Marta Polo, Maria Isabel Gómez-Roncero, Eva Barragán, Rosa Ayala, Carmen Chillón, Maria José Calasanz, Bruno Paiva, Blanca Boluda, Ignacio Casas-Avilés, Pilar Lloret-Madrid, Maria-José Sánchez, Carlos Rodríguez-Medina, Laida Cuevas, José Ángel Raposo-Puglia, M Carmen Mateos, Matxalen Olivares, Carmen Martínez-Chamorro, Natalia Alonso, Sandra Suárez, Irene Sánchez-Vadillo, María Solé Rodríguez, Bernardo Javier González, Antonio Martínez-Francés, Rebeca Cuello, Alfonso Fernández, David Martínez-Cuadrón, Jorge Labrador","doi":"10.1200/JCO-25-01841","DOIUrl":"10.1200/JCO-25-01841","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quizartinib, an oral, selective, second-generation, type-II FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor with high binding affinity to internal tandem duplication (ITD) and wild-type (WT) FLT3, has shown early clinical activity as monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory <i>FLT3</i>-ITD-negative AML. The phase III QuANTUM-First trial showed that quizartinib significantly prolonged survival versus placebo when added to standard chemotherapy, followed by single-agent maintenance, in patients with newly diagnosed (ND) <i>FLT3-</i>ITD-positive AML. We investigated the safety and efficacy of quizartinib in patients with ND <i>FLT3</i>-ITD-negative AML.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled QUIWI trial enrolled patients age 18-70 years with ND <i>FLT3</i>-ITD-negative (mutant-to-WT allelic ratio <0.03) AML. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy combined with either quizartinib 60 mg once daily or placebo, followed by single-agent maintenance with quizartinib or placebo. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 273 patients were randomly assigned to quizartinib (n = 180) or placebo (n = 93). At data cutoff, median EFS was 20.4 months and 9.9 months in the quizartinib and placebo arms, respectively (<i>P</i> = .046). Median OS was not reached and 29.3 months in the quizartinib and placebo arms, respectively (<i>P</i> = .012); 3-year OS rates were 60.8% and 45.7%. The most frequently reported adverse events (any grade) were fever, rash, diarrhea, and mucositis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of quizartinib to standard chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer EFS and OS than placebo in patients with ND <i>FLT3</i>-ITD-negative AML.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"42-53"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12736402/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145286208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1200/JCO-24-02835
Pascale Tomasini, Yongsheng Wang, Yongsheng Li, Enriqueta Felip, Lin Wu, Jiuwei Cui, Benjamin Besse, Alexander I Spira, Joel W Neal, Koichi Goto, Christina S Baik, Melina E Marmarelis, Eiki Ichihara, Yiping Zhang, Jong-Seok Lee, Se-Hoon Lee, James Chih-Hsin Yang, Sebastian Michels, Zacharias Anastasiou, Joshua C Curtin, Xuesong Lyu, Janine Mahoney, Levon Demirdjian, Craig S Meyer, Youyi Zhang, Isabelle Leconte, Patricia Lorenzini, Roland E Knoblauch, Leonardo Trani, Mahadi Baig, Joshua M Bauml, Byoung Chul Cho
Purpose: For patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring atypical epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (eg, S768I, L861Q, G719X), efficacy of current treatment options is limited.
Patients and methods: CHRYSALIS-2 Cohort C enrolled participants with NSCLC harboring atypical EGFR mutations (G719X, S768I, L861Q, etc) and ≤2 previous lines of therapy. Participants were treatment-naïve or previously received first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Coexisting exon 20 insertions, exon 19 deletions, or exon 21 L858R mutations were exclusionary. Participants received 1,050 mg (1,400 mg if ≥80 kg) intravenous amivantamab once weekly for the first 4 weeks and then once every 2 weeks plus 240 mg oral lazertinib once daily. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR).
Results: As of January 12, 2024, 105 participants received amivantamab-lazertinib. Most common atypical mutations were G719X (56%), L861X (26%), and S768I (23%), including single and compound mutations. In the overall population (median follow-up: 16.1 months), the ORR was 52% (95% CI, 42 to 62). The median duration of response (mDoR) was 14.1 months (95% CI, 9.5 to 26.2). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.8 to 17.8); median overall survival (mOS) was not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 22.8 to NE). Adverse events were consistent with previous studies and primarily grade 1 and 2. Among treatment-naïve participants, the ORR was 57% (95% CI, 42 to 71). The mPFS was 19.5 months (95% CI, 11.2 to NE), the mDoR was 20.7 months (95% CI, 9.9 to NE), and mOS was NE (95% CI, 26.3 to NE). Solitary or compound EGFR mutations had no major impact on ORR. The ORR in participants with P-loop and αC-helix compressing, classical-like, and T790M-like mutations was 45% (n = 38), 64% (n = 14), and 67% (n = 3), respectively.
Conclusion: In participants with atypical EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, amivantamab-lazertinib demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity with no new safety signals.
{"title":"Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib in Atypical <i>EGFR</i>-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From CHRYSALIS-2.","authors":"Pascale Tomasini, Yongsheng Wang, Yongsheng Li, Enriqueta Felip, Lin Wu, Jiuwei Cui, Benjamin Besse, Alexander I Spira, Joel W Neal, Koichi Goto, Christina S Baik, Melina E Marmarelis, Eiki Ichihara, Yiping Zhang, Jong-Seok Lee, Se-Hoon Lee, James Chih-Hsin Yang, Sebastian Michels, Zacharias Anastasiou, Joshua C Curtin, Xuesong Lyu, Janine Mahoney, Levon Demirdjian, Craig S Meyer, Youyi Zhang, Isabelle Leconte, Patricia Lorenzini, Roland E Knoblauch, Leonardo Trani, Mahadi Baig, Joshua M Bauml, Byoung Chul Cho","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02835","DOIUrl":"10.1200/JCO-24-02835","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring atypical epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) mutations (eg, S768I, L861Q, G719X), efficacy of current treatment options is limited.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>CHRYSALIS-2 Cohort C enrolled participants with NSCLC harboring atypical <i>EGFR</i> mutations (G719X, S768I, L861Q, etc) and ≤2 previous lines of therapy. Participants were treatment-naïve or previously received first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Coexisting exon 20 insertions, exon 19 deletions, or exon 21 L858R mutations were exclusionary. Participants received 1,050 mg (1,400 mg if ≥80 kg) intravenous amivantamab once weekly for the first 4 weeks and then once every 2 weeks plus 240 mg oral lazertinib once daily. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of January 12, 2024, 105 participants received amivantamab-lazertinib. Most common atypical mutations were G719X (56%), L861X (26%), and S768I (23%), including single and compound mutations. In the overall population (median follow-up: 16.1 months), the ORR was 52% (95% CI, 42 to 62). The median duration of response (mDoR) was 14.1 months (95% CI, 9.5 to 26.2). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.8 to 17.8); median overall survival (mOS) was not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 22.8 to NE). Adverse events were consistent with previous studies and primarily grade 1 and 2. Among treatment-naïve participants, the ORR was 57% (95% CI, 42 to 71). The mPFS was 19.5 months (95% CI, 11.2 to NE), the mDoR was 20.7 months (95% CI, 9.9 to NE), and mOS was NE (95% CI, 26.3 to NE). Solitary or compound <i>EGFR</i> mutations had no major impact on ORR. The ORR in participants with P-loop and αC-helix compressing, classical-like, and T790M-like mutations was 45% (n = 38), 64% (n = 14), and 67% (n = 3), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In participants with atypical <i>EGFR</i>-mutated advanced NSCLC, amivantamab-lazertinib demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity with no new safety signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"54-65"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12736406/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145653004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zezhong Ye,Reza Mojahed-Yazdi,Anna Zapaishchykova,Divyanshu Tak,Maryam Mahootiha,Juan Carlos Climent Pardo,John Zielke,Yining Zha,Christian Guthier,Roy B Tishler,Danielle N Margalit,Jonathan D Schoenfeld,Robert I Haddad,Ravindra Uppaluri,Benjamin Haibe-Kains,Clifton D Fuller,Mohamed Naser,Barbara A Burtness,Hugo J W L Aerts,Frank Hoebers,Benjamin H Kann
PURPOSEExtranodal extension (ENE) is a biomarker in oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) but can only be diagnosed via surgical pathology. We applied an automated artificial intelligence (AI) imaging platform integrating lymph node autosegmentation with ENE prediction to determine the prognostic value of the number of predicted ENE nodes.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a multisite, retrospective study of 1,733 OPC patients with pretreatment computed tomography who underwent definitive radiation therapy across three institutions. Malignant lymph nodes were segmented using a validated deep learning auto-segmentation model, and segmented lymph nodes were sequentially processed with a validated ENE prediction model to calculate number of nodes with AI-predicted ENE (AI-ENE) per patient. We evaluated associations of AI-ENE with disease outcomes using site-stratified, multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for human papillomavirus (HPV) status, smoking pack-years, tumor and nodal stage, age, and sex. We evaluated risk-stratification improvement when incorporating AI-ENE into the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-0129 risk groupings and derived American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging with Uno C-indices and decision curve analyses.RESULTSOverall, median AI-ENE node number was 1 (range, 0-6). AI-ENE node number was independently associated with poorer distant control (DC; hazard ratio [HR], 1.44 [95% CI, 1.23 to 1.69]; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.46]; P < .001). Increasing AI-ENE node number was incrementally associated with worse outcome, particularly DC (P < .001). C-indices improved in the external data set when incorporating AI-ENE into RTOG-0129 groupings (OS: 0.70 v 0.65; DC: 0.65 v 0.57) and AJCC-8 stage (OS: 0.75 v 0.70; DC: 0.72 v 0.67; P < .001 for each). The largest improvements were observed among HPV-negative patients (C-index: +15% for OS, +14% for DC).CONCLUSIONAutomated, AI-ENE node number is a novel risk factor for OPC that may better inform pretreatment risk stratification and decision-making.
目的结外延伸(ENE)是口咽癌(OPC)的生物标志物,但只能通过手术病理诊断。我们应用了一个自动化的人工智能(AI)成像平台,将淋巴结自动分割与ENE预测相结合,以确定预测的ENE节点数量的预后价值。材料和方法我们进行了一项多地点、回顾性研究,对三家机构的1733名接受了放射治疗的前处理计算机断层扫描的OPC患者进行了研究。使用经过验证的深度学习自动分割模型对恶性淋巴结进行分割,并使用经过验证的ENE预测模型对分割后的淋巴结进行顺序处理,计算每个患者具有ai预测ENE的节点数(AI-ENE)。我们使用位点分层、多变量Cox回归评估AI-ENE与疾病结局的关联,调整了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)状态、吸烟包年、肿瘤和淋巴结分期、年龄和性别。当将AI-ENE纳入放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)-0129风险分组时,我们评估了风险分层的改善,并导出了美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版分期,使用Uno c指数和决策曲线分析。结果总体而言,AI-ENE中位节点数为1(范围0-6)。AI-ENE节点数与较差的远程控制(DC;风险比[HR], 1.44 [95% CI, 1.23 ~ 1.69]; P < .001)和总生存率(OS; HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.16 ~ 1.46], P < .001)独立相关。AI-ENE节点数目的增加与预后的恶化逐渐相关,尤其是DC (P < 0.001)。将AI-ENE纳入RTOG-0129分组(OS: 0.70 v 0.65; DC: 0.65 v 0.57)和AJCC-8阶段(OS: 0.75 v 0.70; DC: 0.72 v 0.67; P < 0.001)时,外部数据集的c指数有所改善。在hpv阴性患者中观察到最大的改善(c指数:OS +15%, DC +14%)。结论自动化AI-ENE节点数是OPC的一个新的危险因素,可以更好地为预处理风险分层和决策提供信息。
{"title":"Automated Lymph Node and Extranodal Extension Assessment Improves Risk Stratification in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.","authors":"Zezhong Ye,Reza Mojahed-Yazdi,Anna Zapaishchykova,Divyanshu Tak,Maryam Mahootiha,Juan Carlos Climent Pardo,John Zielke,Yining Zha,Christian Guthier,Roy B Tishler,Danielle N Margalit,Jonathan D Schoenfeld,Robert I Haddad,Ravindra Uppaluri,Benjamin Haibe-Kains,Clifton D Fuller,Mohamed Naser,Barbara A Burtness,Hugo J W L Aerts,Frank Hoebers,Benjamin H Kann","doi":"10.1200/jco-24-02679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-24-02679","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSEExtranodal extension (ENE) is a biomarker in oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) but can only be diagnosed via surgical pathology. We applied an automated artificial intelligence (AI) imaging platform integrating lymph node autosegmentation with ENE prediction to determine the prognostic value of the number of predicted ENE nodes.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a multisite, retrospective study of 1,733 OPC patients with pretreatment computed tomography who underwent definitive radiation therapy across three institutions. Malignant lymph nodes were segmented using a validated deep learning auto-segmentation model, and segmented lymph nodes were sequentially processed with a validated ENE prediction model to calculate number of nodes with AI-predicted ENE (AI-ENE) per patient. We evaluated associations of AI-ENE with disease outcomes using site-stratified, multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for human papillomavirus (HPV) status, smoking pack-years, tumor and nodal stage, age, and sex. We evaluated risk-stratification improvement when incorporating AI-ENE into the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-0129 risk groupings and derived American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging with Uno C-indices and decision curve analyses.RESULTSOverall, median AI-ENE node number was 1 (range, 0-6). AI-ENE node number was independently associated with poorer distant control (DC; hazard ratio [HR], 1.44 [95% CI, 1.23 to 1.69]; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.46]; P < .001). Increasing AI-ENE node number was incrementally associated with worse outcome, particularly DC (P < .001). C-indices improved in the external data set when incorporating AI-ENE into RTOG-0129 groupings (OS: 0.70 v 0.65; DC: 0.65 v 0.57) and AJCC-8 stage (OS: 0.75 v 0.70; DC: 0.72 v 0.67; P < .001 for each). The largest improvements were observed among HPV-negative patients (C-index: +15% for OS, +14% for DC).CONCLUSIONAutomated, AI-ENE node number is a novel risk factor for OPC that may better inform pretreatment risk stratification and decision-making.","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"29 1","pages":"JCO2402679"},"PeriodicalIF":45.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145813460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A physician confronts the burden of silence in the care of the dying.
医生在照顾临终者时面临着沉默的负担。
{"title":"Final Silence.","authors":"Ju Won Kim","doi":"10.1200/JCO-25-01709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-01709","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A physician confronts the burden of silence in the care of the dying.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2501709"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145819231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joanna A Krupka,Ilias Moutsopoulos,Natasha H Cutmore,Christopher S Trethewey,Alimu Dayimu,Rebecca Goodhew,Furqaan Kaji,Livia Raso-Barnett,Heok Cheow,Lee Elzubeir,Julie Smith,Anver Kamil,Ramona-Rita Barbara,Jane Price,Kay Elston,Aleksandra Kolodziejczyk,Silvia Tarantino,Fabiana Mariscotti,Philip Barry,Steven Frost,Nikolaos Demiris,Martin G Thomas,Duane Hassane,Veerendra Munugalavadla,Sateesh Kumar Nagumantry,Mamatha J Karanth,Matthew Ahearne,Nimish Shah,Christopher P Fox,Shubha Anand,Daniel J Hodson
PURPOSECirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a promising tool to monitor treatment response in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Tracking tumor-specific phased variants (PVs) allows ultrasensitive detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) that may enhance the accuracy of response assessment. Previous studies have been constrained by small cohort size, retrospective design, or assays limited to a single commercial provider.PATIENTS AND METHODSDIRECT was a prospective, multisite study evaluating the utility of ctDNA in patients with LBCL. We developed a lymphoma-customized, open-source, ctDNA assay and pipeline that captured hundreds of PVs per patient. Using landmark analysis, we evaluated the prognostic impact of PV-supported MRD at the end of first-line therapy (EoT).RESULTSEoT PV-MRD status was available for 155 patients. After a median of 24.5 months, 2-year time to tumor progression (TTP) for patients with detectable versus undetectable PV-MRD was 42% versus 95%, respectively (P < .001; hazard ratio [HR], 13.7). When restricted to patients receiving full-dose anthracycline-based immunochemotherapy, 2-year TTP was 45% versus 96%, respectively (P < .001; HR, 15.4), outperforming conventional radiological response assessment (HRs, 6.9 for positron emission tomography v 16.9 for PV-MRD). The limit of detection with 95% confidence (LoD95) varied by more than two orders of magnitude across patients, underscoring the need to report patient-specific LoD95. Persistent PV-MRD in the absence of relapse was noted, including three of four patients with transformed follicular lymphoma, highlighting a potential caveat when interpreting positive PV-MRD.CONCLUSIONEoT PV-MRD enables sensitive and clinically meaningful response assessment in LBCL. It provides independent prognostic information, enhancing EoT response assessment beyond conventional radiologic assessment. Our findings support the incorporation of PV-MRD into clinical trials and routine management of diffuse LBCL.
{"title":"Phased Variant-Supported Circulating Tumor DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker After First-Line Treatment in Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Findings From the DIRECT Study.","authors":"Joanna A Krupka,Ilias Moutsopoulos,Natasha H Cutmore,Christopher S Trethewey,Alimu Dayimu,Rebecca Goodhew,Furqaan Kaji,Livia Raso-Barnett,Heok Cheow,Lee Elzubeir,Julie Smith,Anver Kamil,Ramona-Rita Barbara,Jane Price,Kay Elston,Aleksandra Kolodziejczyk,Silvia Tarantino,Fabiana Mariscotti,Philip Barry,Steven Frost,Nikolaos Demiris,Martin G Thomas,Duane Hassane,Veerendra Munugalavadla,Sateesh Kumar Nagumantry,Mamatha J Karanth,Matthew Ahearne,Nimish Shah,Christopher P Fox,Shubha Anand,Daniel J Hodson","doi":"10.1200/jco-25-01587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-01587","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSECirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a promising tool to monitor treatment response in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Tracking tumor-specific phased variants (PVs) allows ultrasensitive detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) that may enhance the accuracy of response assessment. Previous studies have been constrained by small cohort size, retrospective design, or assays limited to a single commercial provider.PATIENTS AND METHODSDIRECT was a prospective, multisite study evaluating the utility of ctDNA in patients with LBCL. We developed a lymphoma-customized, open-source, ctDNA assay and pipeline that captured hundreds of PVs per patient. Using landmark analysis, we evaluated the prognostic impact of PV-supported MRD at the end of first-line therapy (EoT).RESULTSEoT PV-MRD status was available for 155 patients. After a median of 24.5 months, 2-year time to tumor progression (TTP) for patients with detectable versus undetectable PV-MRD was 42% versus 95%, respectively (P < .001; hazard ratio [HR], 13.7). When restricted to patients receiving full-dose anthracycline-based immunochemotherapy, 2-year TTP was 45% versus 96%, respectively (P < .001; HR, 15.4), outperforming conventional radiological response assessment (HRs, 6.9 for positron emission tomography v 16.9 for PV-MRD). The limit of detection with 95% confidence (LoD95) varied by more than two orders of magnitude across patients, underscoring the need to report patient-specific LoD95. Persistent PV-MRD in the absence of relapse was noted, including three of four patients with transformed follicular lymphoma, highlighting a potential caveat when interpreting positive PV-MRD.CONCLUSIONEoT PV-MRD enables sensitive and clinically meaningful response assessment in LBCL. It provides independent prognostic information, enhancing EoT response assessment beyond conventional radiologic assessment. Our findings support the incorporation of PV-MRD into clinical trials and routine management of diffuse LBCL.","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"369 1","pages":"JCO2501587"},"PeriodicalIF":45.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145807582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-20Epub Date: 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-02598
William Dale, Heidi D Klepin, Grant R Williams, Shabbir M H Alibhai, Cristiane Bergerot, Karlynn Brintzenhofeszoc, Judith O Hopkins, Minaxi P Jhawer, Vani Katheria, Kah Poh Loh, Lisa M Lowenstein, June M McKoy, Vanita Noronha, Tanyanika Phillips, Ashley E Rosko, Tracy Ruegg, Melody K Schiaffino, John F Simmons, Ishwaria Subbiah, William P Tew, Tracy L Webb, Mary Whitehead, Mark R Somerfield, Supriya G Mohile
{"title":"Erratum: Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Systemic Cancer Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update.","authors":"William Dale, Heidi D Klepin, Grant R Williams, Shabbir M H Alibhai, Cristiane Bergerot, Karlynn Brintzenhofeszoc, Judith O Hopkins, Minaxi P Jhawer, Vani Katheria, Kah Poh Loh, Lisa M Lowenstein, June M McKoy, Vanita Noronha, Tanyanika Phillips, Ashley E Rosko, Tracy Ruegg, Melody K Schiaffino, John F Simmons, Ishwaria Subbiah, William P Tew, Tracy L Webb, Mary Whitehead, Mark R Somerfield, Supriya G Mohile","doi":"10.1200/JCO-25-02598","DOIUrl":"10.1200/JCO-25-02598","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"3850"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145523500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}