首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Clinical Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Systemic Treatment for Biochemical Recurrence of Localized Prostate Cancer: Do Not EMBARK on When, If the Answer Is How. 局部前列腺癌生化复发的系统治疗:如果答案是 "如何",就不要纠结 "何时"。
IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.01134
Bertrand Tombal, Gianluca Giannarini
{"title":"Systemic Treatment for Biochemical Recurrence of Localized Prostate Cancer: Do Not EMBARK on When, If the Answer Is How.","authors":"Bertrand Tombal, Gianluca Giannarini","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.01134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.01134","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142143083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phase I/Ib Trial of Inavolisib Plus Palbociclib and Endocrine Therapy for PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer. 针对 PIK3CA 突变、激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性晚期或转移性乳腺癌的 Inavolisib 加 Palbociclib 和内分泌疗法的 I/Ib 期试验。
IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00110
Komal L Jhaveri, Melissa K Accordino, Philippe L Bedard, Andrés Cervantes, Valentina Gambardella, Erika Hamilton, Antoine Italiano, Kevin Kalinsky, Ian E Krop, Mafalda Oliveira, Peter Schmid, Cristina Saura, Nicholas C Turner, Andrea Varga, Sravanthi Cheeti, Stephanie Hilz, Katherine E Hutchinson, Yanling Jin, Stephanie Royer-Joo, Ubong Peters, Noopur Shankar, Jennifer L Schutzman, Dejan Juric

Purpose: To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity of inavolisib, a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of p110α that promotes the degradation of mutated p110α, in combination with palbociclib and endocrine therapy (ET), in a phase I/Ib study in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03006172).

Methods: Women ≥18 years of age received inavolisib, palbociclib, and letrozole (Inavo + Palbo + Letro arm) or fulvestrant (Inavo + Palbo + Fulv arm) until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary objective was to evaluate safety or tolerability.

Results: Fifty-three patients were included, 33 in the Inavo + Palbo + Letro arm and 20 in the Inavo + Palbo + Fulv arm. Median duration of inavolisib treatment was 15.7 and 20.8 months (cutoff: March 27, 2023), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients; the most frequent were stomatitis, hyperglycemia, and diarrhea; grade ≥3 any TRAE rates were 87.9% and 85.0%; 6.1% and 10.0% discontinued any treatment due to TRAEs in the Inavo + Palbo + Letro and Inavo + Palbo + Fulv arms, respectively. No PK drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were observed among the study treatments when administered. Confirmed objective response rates were 52.0% and 40.0% in patients with measurable disease, and median progression-free survival was 23.3 and 35.0 months in the Inavo + Palbo + Letro and Inavo + Palbo + Fulv arms, respectively. Available paired pre- and on-treatment tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA analyses confirmed the effects of study treatment on pharmacodynamic and pathophysiologic biomarkers of response.

Conclusion: Inavolisib plus palbociclib and ET demonstrated a manageable safety profile, lack of DDIs, and promising preliminary antitumor activity.

研究目的目的:在PIK3CA突变、激素受体阳性/内分泌治疗(ET)患者的I/Ib期研究中,研究inavolisib(一种强效、选择性的p110α小分子抑制剂,可促进突变p110α的降解)的安全性、耐受性、药代动力学(PK)和初步抗肿瘤活性、在一项针对PIK3CA突变、激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性的局部晚期/转移性乳腺癌患者的I/Ib期研究中,与palbociclib和内分泌治疗(ET)联合使用(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03006172):年龄≥18岁的女性接受依那西普、帕博西利和来曲唑(依那西普+帕博+来曲臂)或氟维司群(依那西普+帕博+氟维司群臂)治疗,直至出现不可接受的毒性或疾病进展。主要目的是评估安全性或耐受性:共纳入53例患者,其中33例在伊纳沃+帕博+来曲治疗组,20例在伊纳沃+帕博+氟维司群治疗组。依那韦利西治疗的中位持续时间分别为15.7个月和20.8个月(截止日期:2023年3月27日)。所有患者均发生了治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs);最常见的不良事件是口腔炎、高血糖和腹泻;≥3级的任何TRAE发生率分别为87.9%和85.0%;因TRAEs而中断任何治疗的患者在伊那沃+帕博+乐妥和伊那沃+帕博+Fulv两组分别占6.1%和10.0%。在用药过程中,未观察到研究治疗药物之间的 PK 药物相互作用 (DDI)。可测量疾病患者的确诊客观反应率分别为52.0%和40.0%,Inavo + Palbo + Letro治疗组和Inavo + Palbo + Fulv治疗组的中位无进展生存期分别为23.3个月和35.0个月。现有的治疗前和治疗中肿瘤组织和循环肿瘤DNA配对分析证实了研究治疗对反应的药效学和病理生理学生物标志物的影响:Inavolisib plus palbociclib and ET表现出了可控的安全性、无DDIs和良好的初步抗肿瘤活性。
{"title":"Phase I/Ib Trial of Inavolisib Plus Palbociclib and Endocrine Therapy for <i>PIK3CA</i>-Mutated, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer.","authors":"Komal L Jhaveri, Melissa K Accordino, Philippe L Bedard, Andrés Cervantes, Valentina Gambardella, Erika Hamilton, Antoine Italiano, Kevin Kalinsky, Ian E Krop, Mafalda Oliveira, Peter Schmid, Cristina Saura, Nicholas C Turner, Andrea Varga, Sravanthi Cheeti, Stephanie Hilz, Katherine E Hutchinson, Yanling Jin, Stephanie Royer-Joo, Ubong Peters, Noopur Shankar, Jennifer L Schutzman, Dejan Juric","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity of inavolisib, a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of p110α that promotes the degradation of mutated p110α, in combination with palbociclib and endocrine therapy (ET), in a phase I/Ib study in patients with <i>PIK3CA</i>-mutated, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03006172).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women ≥18 years of age received inavolisib, palbociclib, and letrozole (Inavo + Palbo + Letro arm) or fulvestrant (Inavo + Palbo + Fulv arm) until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary objective was to evaluate safety or tolerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients were included, 33 in the Inavo + Palbo + Letro arm and 20 in the Inavo + Palbo + Fulv arm. Median duration of inavolisib treatment was 15.7 and 20.8 months (cutoff: March 27, 2023), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients; the most frequent were stomatitis, hyperglycemia, and diarrhea; grade ≥3 any TRAE rates were 87.9% and 85.0%; 6.1% and 10.0% discontinued any treatment due to TRAEs in the Inavo + Palbo + Letro and Inavo + Palbo + Fulv arms, respectively. No PK drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were observed among the study treatments when administered. Confirmed objective response rates were 52.0% and 40.0% in patients with measurable disease, and median progression-free survival was 23.3 and 35.0 months in the Inavo + Palbo + Letro and Inavo + Palbo + Fulv arms, respectively. Available paired pre- and on-treatment tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA analyses confirmed the effects of study treatment on pharmacodynamic and pathophysiologic biomarkers of response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inavolisib plus palbociclib and ET demonstrated a manageable safety profile, lack of DDIs, and promising preliminary antitumor activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Results From First-in-Human Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of a Novel Bicycle Toxin Conjugate Targeting EphA2 (BT5528) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. 靶向 EphA2 的新型自行车毒素共轭物 (BT5528) 在晚期实体瘤患者中的首次人体 I 期剂量放大研究结果。
IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.01107
Babar Bashir, Judy S Wang, Gerald Falchook, Elisa Fontana, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau, Louise Carter, Rachel Galot, Bristi Basu, Alastair Greystoke, Vivek Subbiah, Debra L Richardson, Hanna Orr, Gavin Bennett, Rajiv Sharma, Hongmei Xu, Paola Paganoni, Cong Xu, Carly Campbell, Meredith McKean

Purpose: BT5528 is a Bicycle Toxin Conjugate, a novel class of chemically synthesized molecules, comprising a bicyclic peptide targeting EphA2 tumor antigen, linked to a cytotoxin (monomethyl auristatin E [MMAE]). EphA2 is overexpressed in many solid tumors and contributes to oncogenesis, tumor-associated angiogenesis, and metastasis.

Materials and methods: The primary objectives were to investigate the safety and tolerability of BT5528 and to define the maximum-tolerated dose, if observed, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D)/expansion dose. Dose escalation exploring once every week or once every 2 weeks administration of BT5528 employed a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design for the first two dose levels, followed by a Bayesian logistic regression model. Secondary and exploratory end points included preliminary efficacy and the pharmacokinetics of BT5528 and MMAE.

Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled and received BT5528 doses between 2.2 mg/m2 once every week to 10.0 mg/m2 once every 2 weeks within the dose-escalation stage of the study. The most frequent BT5528-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (44.4%), diarrhea (35.6%), and fatigue (33.3%), and the most common grade ≥3 BT5528-related AE was neutropenia/neutrophil count decrease (22.2%). Dose level 6.5 mg/m2 once every 2 weeks was selected as a RP2D. At 6.5 mg/m2 once every 2 weeks, the overall response rate was 6.7%, and the disease control rate was 20.0%. BT5528 and MMAE pharmacokinetics are generally dose proportional. BT5528 has a short half-life (0.4-0.7 hours), and the half-life of MMAE is longer (35-47 hours).

Conclusion: BT5528 was well tolerated and demonstrated favorable and preliminary antitumor activity. We believe these data provide preliminary validation of a Bicycle Toxin Conjugate approach to EphA2 tumor antigen. The study is ongoing and is evaluating BT5528 as monotherapy at a RP2D of 6.5 mg/m2 once every 2 weeks.

目的:BT5528 是一种自行车毒素共轭物,它是一类化学合成的新型分子,由靶向 EphA2 肿瘤抗原的双环肽与细胞毒素(单甲基乌司他丁 E [MMAE])连接而成。EphA2 在许多实体瘤中过度表达,有助于肿瘤发生、肿瘤相关血管生成和转移:主要目的是研究BT5528的安全性和耐受性,并确定最大耐受剂量(如果观察到)和II期推荐剂量(RP2D)/扩大剂量。剂量升级探索每周一次或每两周一次服用BT5528,前两个剂量水平采用3 + 3剂量升级设计,然后采用贝叶斯逻辑回归模型。次要和探索性终点包括初步疗效以及 BT5528 和 MMAE 的药代动力学:45名患者入组,在研究的剂量递增阶段,他们接受的BT5528剂量从每周一次的2.2 mg/m2到每两周一次的10.0 mg/m2不等。最常见的BT5528相关不良事件(AEs)是恶心(44.4%)、腹泻(35.6%)和疲劳(33.3%),最常见的≥3级BT5528相关AE是中性粒细胞减少/中性粒细胞计数减少(22.2%)。剂量水平为 6.5 mg/m2,每 2 周一次,被选为 RP2D。6.5毫克/平方米、每两周一次的剂量水平下,总反应率为6.7%,疾病控制率为20.0%。BT5528 和 MMAE 的药代动力学一般与剂量成正比。BT5528的半衰期较短(0.4-0.7小时),而MMAE的半衰期较长(35-47小时):BT5528的耐受性良好,并显示出良好的初步抗肿瘤活性。我们相信,这些数据初步验证了针对 EphA2 肿瘤抗原的 "自行车毒素共轭物 "方法。这项研究正在进行中,目前正在评估 BT5528 作为单药治疗的效果,RP2D 为 6.5 mg/m2,每 2 周一次。
{"title":"Results From First-in-Human Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of a Novel Bicycle Toxin Conjugate Targeting EphA2 (BT5528) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.","authors":"Babar Bashir, Judy S Wang, Gerald Falchook, Elisa Fontana, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau, Louise Carter, Rachel Galot, Bristi Basu, Alastair Greystoke, Vivek Subbiah, Debra L Richardson, Hanna Orr, Gavin Bennett, Rajiv Sharma, Hongmei Xu, Paola Paganoni, Cong Xu, Carly Campbell, Meredith McKean","doi":"10.1200/JCO.23.01107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>BT5528 is a Bicycle Toxin Conjugate, a novel class of chemically synthesized molecules, comprising a bicyclic peptide targeting EphA2 tumor antigen, linked to a cytotoxin (monomethyl auristatin E [MMAE]). EphA2 is overexpressed in many solid tumors and contributes to oncogenesis, tumor-associated angiogenesis, and metastasis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The primary objectives were to investigate the safety and tolerability of BT5528 and to define the maximum-tolerated dose, if observed, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D)/expansion dose. Dose escalation exploring once every week or once every 2 weeks administration of BT5528 employed a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design for the first two dose levels, followed by a Bayesian logistic regression model. Secondary and exploratory end points included preliminary efficacy and the pharmacokinetics of BT5528 and MMAE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five patients were enrolled and received BT5528 doses between 2.2 mg/m<sup>2</sup> once every week to 10.0 mg/m<sup>2</sup> once every 2 weeks within the dose-escalation stage of the study. The most frequent BT5528-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (44.4%), diarrhea (35.6%), and fatigue (33.3%), and the most common grade ≥3 BT5528-related AE was neutropenia/neutrophil count decrease (22.2%). Dose level 6.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> once every 2 weeks was selected as a RP2D. At 6.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> once every 2 weeks, the overall response rate was 6.7%, and the disease control rate was 20.0%. BT5528 and MMAE pharmacokinetics are generally dose proportional. BT5528 has a short half-life (0.4-0.7 hours), and the half-life of MMAE is longer (35-47 hours).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BT5528 was well tolerated and demonstrated favorable and preliminary antitumor activity. We believe these data provide preliminary validation of a Bicycle Toxin Conjugate approach to EphA2 tumor antigen. The study is ongoing and is evaluating BT5528 as monotherapy at a RP2D of 6.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> once every 2 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiation Should Not Yet Be Used as Standard of Care for Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma. 术前低分量放射治疗尚不应作为治疗四肢和躯干软组织肉瘤的标准方法。
IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00238
Elizabeth H Baldini, B Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Kilian E Salerno, Peter Chung, Andrew J Bishop, Anusha Kalbasi, Aisha Miah, Meena Bedi, Jeremy P Harris, Ivy Petersen, Charles Gillham, Lisette M Wiltink, Kaled M Alektiar, Rick L Haas, David G Kirsch

Hypofractionated radiation therapy regimens should not be used as standard of care for localized soft tissue sarcoma.

局部软组织肉瘤不应将低分次放射治疗方案作为标准治疗方法。
{"title":"Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiation Should Not Yet Be Used as Standard of Care for Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.","authors":"Elizabeth H Baldini, B Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Kilian E Salerno, Peter Chung, Andrew J Bishop, Anusha Kalbasi, Aisha Miah, Meena Bedi, Jeremy P Harris, Ivy Petersen, Charles Gillham, Lisette M Wiltink, Kaled M Alektiar, Rick L Haas, David G Kirsch","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypofractionated radiation therapy regimens should not be used as standard of care for localized soft tissue sarcoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk of Incident Melanoma Among Individuals With Low-Count Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis. 低计数单克隆 B 细胞淋巴细胞增多症患者罹患黑色素瘤的风险。
IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00332
Bryan A Vallejo, Ahmed Ansari, Sameer A Parikh, Sara J Achenbach, Kari G Rabe, Aaron D Norman, Janet E Olson, Neil E Kay, Esteban Braggio, Curtis A Hanson, Celine M Vachon, James R Cerhan, Cristian L Baum, Tait D Shanafelt, Susan L Slager

Purpose: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)-phenotype monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is a premalignant condition that is roughly 500-fold more common than CLL. It is unknown whether the two-fold increased risk of developing melanoma associated with CLL extends to individuals with MBL.

Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic Biobank, we identified participants who were 40 years or older with no previous hematological malignancies, who resided in the 27 counties around Mayo Clinic, and who had available biospecimens for screening. Eight-color flow cytometry was used to screen for MBL. Individuals with MBL were classified as low-count MBL (LC-MBL) or high-count MBL on the basis of clonal B-cell percent. Incident melanomas were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes and confirmed via medical records review. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI.

Results: Of the 7,334 participants screened, 1,151 were identified with a CD5-positive MBL, of whom 1,098 had LC-MBL. After a median follow-up of 3.2 years (range, 0-13.5), 131 participants developed melanoma, of whom 36 individuals were positive for MBL. The estimated 5-year cumulative incidence of melanoma was 3.4% and 2.0% among those with and without MBL, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, and history of previous melanoma, individuals with MBL exhibited a 1.86-fold (95% CI, 1.25 to 2.78) risk of melanoma. This elevated risk persisted when analysis was restricted to those without a history of melanoma (HR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.30 to 3.23]). Individuals with LC-MBL had a 1.92-fold (95% CI, 1.29 to 2.87) increased risk of developing melanoma overall and a 2.74-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.50 to 5.03) of melanoma in situ compared with those without MBL.

Conclusion: LC-MBL is associated with an approximately two-fold increased risk of melanoma overall and a 2.74-fold increased risk of melanoma in situ.

目的:慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)表型单克隆 B 细胞淋巴细胞增多症(MBL)是一种恶性肿瘤前病变,其发病率约为 CLL 的 500 倍。CLL患者罹患黑色素瘤的风险比MBL患者高出两倍,而MBL患者罹患黑色素瘤的风险是否也比CLL患者高出两倍,目前尚不清楚:我们利用梅奥诊所生物库,确定了年龄在 40 岁或 40 岁以上、既往未患血液恶性肿瘤、居住在梅奥诊所周围 27 个县并有生物样本可供筛查的参与者。采用八色流式细胞术筛查 MBL。根据克隆 B 细胞的百分比,将 MBL 患者分为低计数 MBL(LC-MBL)和高计数 MBL。通过国际疾病分类代码确定黑色素瘤的发病情况,并通过病历审查进行确认。采用 Cox 回归模型估算危险比 (HR) 和 95% CI:在接受筛查的 7,334 名参与者中,有 1,151 人被确定为 CD5 阳性 MBL,其中 1,098 人患有 LC-MBL。中位随访 3.2 年(0-13.5 年)后,131 名参与者罹患黑色素瘤,其中 36 人 MBL 阳性。据估计,在患有和未患有 MBL 的人群中,黑色素瘤的 5 年累积发病率分别为 3.4% 和 2.0%。在对年龄、性别和既往黑色素瘤病史进行调整后,MBL 患者罹患黑色素瘤的风险为 1.86 倍(95% CI,1.25 至 2.78)。当分析范围仅限于无黑色素瘤病史者时,这种风险升高的情况依然存在(HR,2.05 [95% CI,1.30 至 3.23])。与没有 MBL 的人相比,LC-MBL 患者罹患黑色素瘤的总体风险增加了 1.92 倍(95% CI,1.29 至 2.87),原位黑色素瘤的风险增加了 2.74 倍(95% CI,1.50 至 5.03):LC-MBL与黑色素瘤总体患病风险增加约2倍和原位黑色素瘤患病风险增加2.74倍有关。
{"title":"Risk of Incident Melanoma Among Individuals With Low-Count Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis.","authors":"Bryan A Vallejo, Ahmed Ansari, Sameer A Parikh, Sara J Achenbach, Kari G Rabe, Aaron D Norman, Janet E Olson, Neil E Kay, Esteban Braggio, Curtis A Hanson, Celine M Vachon, James R Cerhan, Cristian L Baum, Tait D Shanafelt, Susan L Slager","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)-phenotype monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is a premalignant condition that is roughly 500-fold more common than CLL. It is unknown whether the two-fold increased risk of developing melanoma associated with CLL extends to individuals with MBL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Mayo Clinic Biobank, we identified participants who were 40 years or older with no previous hematological malignancies, who resided in the 27 counties around Mayo Clinic, and who had available biospecimens for screening. Eight-color flow cytometry was used to screen for MBL. Individuals with MBL were classified as low-count MBL (LC-MBL) or high-count MBL on the basis of clonal B-cell percent. Incident melanomas were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes and confirmed via medical records review. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7,334 participants screened, 1,151 were identified with a CD5-positive MBL, of whom 1,098 had LC-MBL. After a median follow-up of 3.2 years (range, 0-13.5), 131 participants developed melanoma, of whom 36 individuals were positive for MBL. The estimated 5-year cumulative incidence of melanoma was 3.4% and 2.0% among those with and without MBL, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, and history of previous melanoma, individuals with MBL exhibited a 1.86-fold (95% CI, 1.25 to 2.78) risk of melanoma. This elevated risk persisted when analysis was restricted to those without a history of melanoma (HR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.30 to 3.23]). Individuals with LC-MBL had a 1.92-fold (95% CI, 1.29 to 2.87) increased risk of developing melanoma overall and a 2.74-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.50 to 5.03) of melanoma in situ compared with those without MBL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LC-MBL is associated with an approximately two-fold increased risk of melanoma overall and a 2.74-fold increased risk of melanoma in situ.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New Benchmark for Targeted Therapies in Lung Cancer: Median Progression-Free Survival for Lorlatinib in Advanced ALK+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Surpasses 5 years. 肺癌靶向治疗的新基准:洛拉替尼(Lorlatinib)治疗晚期ALK+非小细胞肺癌的中位无进展生存期超过5年。
IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.01147
Christine M Lovly
{"title":"New Benchmark for Targeted Therapies in Lung Cancer: Median Progression-Free Survival for Lorlatinib in Advanced ALK+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Surpasses 5 years.","authors":"Christine M Lovly","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.01147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.01147","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of the Addition of Oxaliplatin to Fluoropyrimidine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer: An ACCENT Pooled Analysis. 高风险 II 期结肠癌患者在氟嘧啶辅助化疗基础上加用奥沙利铂的评估:ACCENT 汇总分析
IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00394
Benoist Chibaudel, Morteza Raeisi, Romain Cohen, Greg Yothers, Richard M Goldberg, Jean-Baptiste Bachet, Norman Wolmark, Takayuki Yoshino, Hans-Joachim Schmoll, Rachel Kerr, Sara Lonardi, Thomas J George, Einat Shacham-Shmueli, Qian Shi, Thierry André, Aimery de Gramont

Purpose: The adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer (CC) is chemotherapy combining fluoropyrimidine (FP) and oxaliplatin (OX). FP regimen plus OX (FPOX) may benefit in high-risk stage II CC. We performed a pooled analysis of pivotal MOSAIC and C-07 studies evaluating FPOX for the treatment of high-risk stage II CC according to prognostic factors, number of high-risk factors, and current clinicopathologic risk classification on the basis of T stage, tumor perforation, and number of lymph nodes examined.

Patients and methods: One thousand five hundred and ninety-five patients with stage II CC receiving FP or FPOX were pooled. The overall survival (OS) benefit of OX was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and unadjusted Cox models stratified by study. Three thousand and fifty-nine patients with stage III CC were used only for interaction tests between the allocated chemotherapy and stage.

Results: In the pooled analysis of stage II patients, independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis were sex, age, perforation/obstruction, and tumor sidedness. There was a significant interaction in OS between stage and allocated chemotherapy with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.03 for stage II (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.29; P = .813) and 0.82 for stage III (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.92; P = .001; Pint = .073). There was no benefit from the addition of OX to FP for any of the prognostic factors. The number of high-risk factors tested was not predictive of OX benefit. According to the currently agreed clinicopathologic risk classification, no OS benefit of OX was observed, as HR was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.18; P = .349).

Conclusion: No OS benefit of adjuvant OX was found in high-risk stage II CC, regardless of the definition used to characterize tumors as having a high risk for recurrence. Hence, our analysis suggests that OX should not be the standard of care for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CC, even in high-risk patients.

目的:III期结肠癌(CC)的辅助治疗是氟嘧啶(FP)和奥沙利铂(OX)联合化疗。FP方案加OX(FPOX)可能对高风险的II期CC有益。我们对评估FPOX治疗高危II期CC的关键性MOSAIC和C-07研究进行了汇总分析,根据预后因素、高危因素数量以及当前临床病理学风险分类(基于T分期、肿瘤穿孔和检查淋巴结数量)进行了分析:对接受 FP 或 FPOX 治疗的 1595 例 II 期 CC 患者进行了汇总。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和未经调整的Cox模型分析了OX的总生存率(OS)。359例III期CC患者仅用于所分配化疗与分期之间的交互检验:在对II期患者的汇总分析中,多变量分析中的独立预后因素为性别、年龄、穿孔/梗阻和肿瘤侧位。分期与所分配化疗的OS之间存在明显的交互作用,II期患者的危险比(HRs)为1.03(95% CI,0.82至1.29;P = .813),III期患者的危险比(HRs)为0.82(95% CI,0.73至0.92;P = .001;Pint = .073)。就任何预后因素而言,在 FP 的基础上加用 OX 均无益处。检测的高危因素数量并不能预测 OX 的益处。根据目前商定的临床病理学风险分类,OX对OS没有益处,HR为0.86(95% CI,0.63至1.18;P = .349):结论:在高风险II期CC中,无论采用哪种定义来描述肿瘤的高复发风险,都未发现OX辅助治疗对OS有益处。因此,我们的分析表明,OX不应作为II期CC辅助化疗的标准治疗方案,即使是高危患者也是如此。
{"title":"Assessment of the Addition of Oxaliplatin to Fluoropyrimidine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer: An ACCENT Pooled Analysis.","authors":"Benoist Chibaudel, Morteza Raeisi, Romain Cohen, Greg Yothers, Richard M Goldberg, Jean-Baptiste Bachet, Norman Wolmark, Takayuki Yoshino, Hans-Joachim Schmoll, Rachel Kerr, Sara Lonardi, Thomas J George, Einat Shacham-Shmueli, Qian Shi, Thierry André, Aimery de Gramont","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer (CC) is chemotherapy combining fluoropyrimidine (FP) and oxaliplatin (OX). FP regimen plus OX (FPOX) may benefit in high-risk stage II CC. We performed a pooled analysis of pivotal MOSAIC and C-07 studies evaluating FPOX for the treatment of high-risk stage II CC according to prognostic factors, number of high-risk factors, and current clinicopathologic risk classification on the basis of T stage, tumor perforation, and number of lymph nodes examined.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>One thousand five hundred and ninety-five patients with stage II CC receiving FP or FPOX were pooled. The overall survival (OS) benefit of OX was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and unadjusted Cox models stratified by study. Three thousand and fifty-nine patients with stage III CC were used only for interaction tests between the allocated chemotherapy and stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pooled analysis of stage II patients, independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis were sex, age, perforation/obstruction, and tumor sidedness. There was a significant interaction in OS between stage and allocated chemotherapy with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.03 for stage II (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.29; <i>P</i> = .813) and 0.82 for stage III (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.92; <i>P</i> = .001; <i>P</i><sub>int</sub> = .073). There was no benefit from the addition of OX to FP for any of the prognostic factors. The number of high-risk factors tested was not predictive of OX benefit. According to the currently agreed clinicopathologic risk classification, no OS benefit of OX was observed, as HR was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.18; <i>P</i> = .349).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No OS benefit of adjuvant OX was found in high-risk stage II CC, regardless of the definition used to characterize tumors as having a high risk for recurrence. Hence, our analysis suggests that OX should not be the standard of care for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CC, even in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Stratification in Older Intensively Treated Patients With AML. 老年急性髓细胞性白血病强化治疗患者的风险分层
IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.02631
Jurjen Versluis, Marlen Metzner, Ariel Wang, Patrycja Gradowska, Abin Thomas, Niels Asger Jakobsen, Alison Kennedy, Rachel Moore, Emma Boertjes, Christian M Vonk, Francois G Kavelaars, Melissa Rijken, Amanda Gilkes, Claire Schwab, H Berna Beverloo, Markus Manz, Otto Visser, Catharina H M J Van Elssen, Okke de Weerdt, Lidwine W Tick, Bart J Biemond, Marie-Christiane Vekemans, Sylvie D Freeman, Christine J Harrison, Jonathan A Cook, Mike Dennis, Steven Knapper, Ian Thomas, Charles Craddock, Gert J Ossenkoppele, Bob Löwenberg, Nigel Russell, Peter J M Valk, Paresh Vyas

Purpose: AML is a genetically heterogeneous disease, particularly in older patients. In patients older than 60 years, survival rates are variable after the most important curative approach, intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Thus, there is an urgent need in clinical practice for a prognostic model to identify older patients with AML who benefit from curative treatment.

Methods: We studied 1,910 intensively treated patients older than 60 years with AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) from two cohorts (NCRI-AML18 and HOVON-SAKK). The median patient age was 67 years. Using a random survival forest, clinical, molecular, and cytogenetic variables were evaluated in an AML development cohort (n = 1,204) for association with overall survival (OS). Relative weights of selected variables determined the prognostic model, which was validated in AML (n = 491) and HR-MDS cohorts (n = 215).

Results: The complete cohort had a high frequency of poor-risk features, including 2022 European LeukemiaNet adverse-risk (57.3%), mutated TP53 (14.4%), and myelodysplasia-related genetic features (65.1%). Nine variables were used to construct four groups with highly distinct 4-year OS in the (1) AML development, (2) AML validation, and (3) HR-MDS test cohorts ([1] favorable: 54% ± 4%, intermediate: 38% ± 2%, poor: 21% ± 2%, very poor: 4% ± 1%; [2] 54% ± 9%, 43% ± 4%, 27% ± 4%, 4% ± 3%; and [3] 54% ± 10%, 33% ± 6%, 14% ± 5%, 0% ± 3%, respectively). This new AML60+ classification improves current prognostic classifications. Importantly, patients within the AML60+ intermediate- and very poor-risk group significantly benefited from allo-HCT, whereas the poor-risk patients showed an indication, albeit nonsignificant, for improved outcome after allo-HCT.

Conclusion: The new AML60+ classification provides prognostic information for intensively treated patients 60 years and older with AML and HR-MDS and identifies patients who benefit from intensive chemotherapy and allo-HCT.

目的:急性髓细胞性白血病是一种基因异质性疾病,尤其是在老年患者中。对于 60 岁以上的患者来说,最重要的治疗方法是强化化疗后进行异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT),但其存活率却不尽相同。因此,在临床实践中迫切需要一种预后模型来识别从根治性治疗中获益的老年急性髓细胞性白血病患者:我们研究了来自两个队列(NCRI-AML18 和 HOVON-SAKK)的 1,910 名接受强化治疗的 60 岁以上急性髓细胞白血病和高危骨髓增生异常综合征(HR-MDS)患者。患者年龄中位数为 67 岁。利用随机生存森林对急性髓细胞性白血病发展队列(n = 1,204)中的临床、分子和细胞遗传学变量与总生存期(OS)的关系进行了评估。选定变量的相对权重决定了预后模型,该模型在急性髓细胞性白血病队列(n = 491)和HR-MDS队列(n = 215)中得到了验证:结果:整个队列具有高频率的低危特征,包括2022欧洲白血病网络不良风险(57.3%)、TP53突变(14.4%)和骨髓增生异常相关遗传特征(65.1%)。在(1) AML 发展、(2) AML 验证和(3) HR-MDS 测试队列([1] 有利组:54% ± 4%,中间组:5454% ± 4%,中等38%±2%,差:21%±2%,极差:4%±1%;[2]分别为54%±9%、43%±4%、27%±4%、4%±3%;[3]分别为54%±10%、33%±6%、14%±5%、0%±3%)。这种新的 AML60+ 分类改进了目前的预后分类。重要的是,AML60+中危和极危组患者明显受益于同种异体血细胞移植,而低危患者在同种异体血细胞移植后预后改善的迹象虽然不明显:结论:新的AML60+分类为接受强化治疗的60岁及以上急性髓细胞性白血病和HR-MDS患者提供了预后信息,并确定了从强化化疗和allo-HCT中获益的患者。
{"title":"Risk Stratification in Older Intensively Treated Patients With AML.","authors":"Jurjen Versluis, Marlen Metzner, Ariel Wang, Patrycja Gradowska, Abin Thomas, Niels Asger Jakobsen, Alison Kennedy, Rachel Moore, Emma Boertjes, Christian M Vonk, Francois G Kavelaars, Melissa Rijken, Amanda Gilkes, Claire Schwab, H Berna Beverloo, Markus Manz, Otto Visser, Catharina H M J Van Elssen, Okke de Weerdt, Lidwine W Tick, Bart J Biemond, Marie-Christiane Vekemans, Sylvie D Freeman, Christine J Harrison, Jonathan A Cook, Mike Dennis, Steven Knapper, Ian Thomas, Charles Craddock, Gert J Ossenkoppele, Bob Löwenberg, Nigel Russell, Peter J M Valk, Paresh Vyas","doi":"10.1200/JCO.23.02631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.02631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>AML is a genetically heterogeneous disease, particularly in older patients. In patients older than 60 years, survival rates are variable after the most important curative approach, intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Thus, there is an urgent need in clinical practice for a prognostic model to identify older patients with AML who benefit from curative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 1,910 intensively treated patients older than 60 years with AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) from two cohorts (NCRI-AML18 and HOVON-SAKK). The median patient age was 67 years. Using a random survival forest, clinical, molecular, and cytogenetic variables were evaluated in an AML development cohort (n = 1,204) for association with overall survival (OS). Relative weights of selected variables determined the prognostic model, which was validated in AML (n = 491) and HR-MDS cohorts (n = 215).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The complete cohort had a high frequency of poor-risk features, including 2022 European LeukemiaNet adverse-risk (57.3%), mutated <i>TP53</i> (14.4%), and myelodysplasia-related genetic features (65.1%). Nine variables were used to construct four groups with highly distinct 4-year OS in the (1) AML development, (2) AML validation, and (3) HR-MDS test cohorts ([1] favorable: 54% ± 4%, intermediate: 38% ± 2%, poor: 21% ± 2%, very poor: 4% ± 1%; [2] 54% ± 9%, 43% ± 4%, 27% ± 4%, 4% ± 3%; and [3] 54% ± 10%, 33% ± 6%, 14% ± 5%, 0% ± 3%, respectively). This new AML60+ classification improves current prognostic classifications. Importantly, patients within the AML60+ intermediate- and very poor-risk group significantly benefited from allo-HCT, whereas the poor-risk patients showed an indication, albeit nonsignificant, for improved outcome after allo-HCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new AML60+ classification provides prognostic information for intensively treated patients 60 years and older with AML and HR-MDS and identifies patients who benefit from intensive chemotherapy and allo-HCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bladder-Preserving Trimodality Treatment for High-Grade T1 Bladder Cancer: Results From Phase II Protocol NRG Oncology/RTOG 0926. 针对高级别 T1 膀胱癌的保膀胱三联疗法:NRG Oncology/RTOG 0926 II 期治疗方案的结果。
IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.02510
Douglas M Dahl, Joseph P Rodgers, William U Shipley, M Dror Michaelson, Chin-Lee Wu, William Parker, Ashesh B Jani, Fabio L Cury, Richard S Hudes, Jeff M Michalski, Alan C Hartford, Daniel Song, Deborah E Citrin, Theodore G Karrison, Howard M Sandler, Felix Y Feng, Jason A Efstathiou

Purpose: To investigate the use of radiation with radiosensitizing chemotherapy following repeated transurethral resection (trimodality therapy) as an alternative to radical cystectomy in T1 bladder cancer which has failed Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG).

Patients and methods: Patients with recurrent T1 bladders who had failed BCG and were recommended to undergo cystectomy were treated with trimodality therapy. The primary end point was 3-year freedom from cystectomy. Secondary end points were distant metastasis at 3 and 5 years, local recurrence, disease-specific and overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results: This single-arm phase II study enrolled 37 patients. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in 34 patients after three exclusions. The median follow-up was 5.1 years. The 3-year freedom from cystectomy rate was 88% (lower one-sided 97.5% confidence limit [CI], 72%), meeting the primary study goal. OS at 3 and 5 years was 69% (95% CI, 54 to 85) and 56% (95% CI, 39 to 74), respectively. The distant metastasis rates at 3 and 5 years were 12% (95% CI, 4 to 26) and 19% (95% CI, 7 to 34), respectively. Eight patients died due to urothelial cancer, 12 exhibited local recurrence at 3 years (cumulative incidence: 32%; 95% CI, 17 to 48), 18 experienced grade 3 adverse events, mostly hematological, and one developed grade 4 neutropenia.

Conclusion: Trimodality therapy is an effective potential alternative to radical cystectomy for recurrent high-grade T1 urothelial cancer of the bladder. At 3 years, 88% of the patients remained free of cystectomy.

目的:研究在重复经尿道切除术(三联疗法)后使用放射线和放射增敏化疗替代根治性膀胱切除术治疗卡介苗(BCG)治疗失败的T1型膀胱癌的方法:卡介苗(BCG)治疗失败并被建议接受膀胱切除术的复发性T1膀胱癌患者接受了三联疗法。主要终点是3年内无膀胱切除术。次要终点是3年和5年的远处转移、局部复发、疾病特异性和总生存期(OS)以及安全性:这项单臂 II 期研究共招募了 37 名患者。结果:这项单臂 II 期研究共纳入 37 例患者,在排除 3 例患者后,对 34 例患者的疗效和安全性进行了评估。中位随访时间为 5.1 年。3年免于膀胱切除术的比例为88%(单侧97.5%置信下限[CI],72%),达到了主要研究目标。3年和5年的OS分别为69%(95% CI,54至85)和56%(95% CI,39至74)。3年和5年的远处转移率分别为12%(95% CI,4至26)和19%(95% CI,7至34)。8名患者死于尿道癌,12名患者3年后出现局部复发(累计发生率:32%;95% CI,17至48),18名患者出现3级不良反应,主要是血液方面的,1名患者出现4级中性粒细胞减少症:结论:对于复发性T1高级别膀胱尿路上皮癌,三联疗法是根治性膀胱切除术的有效替代方案。3年后,88%的患者仍未接受膀胱切除术。
{"title":"Bladder-Preserving Trimodality Treatment for High-Grade T1 Bladder Cancer: Results From Phase II Protocol NRG Oncology/RTOG 0926.","authors":"Douglas M Dahl, Joseph P Rodgers, William U Shipley, M Dror Michaelson, Chin-Lee Wu, William Parker, Ashesh B Jani, Fabio L Cury, Richard S Hudes, Jeff M Michalski, Alan C Hartford, Daniel Song, Deborah E Citrin, Theodore G Karrison, Howard M Sandler, Felix Y Feng, Jason A Efstathiou","doi":"10.1200/JCO.23.02510","DOIUrl":"10.1200/JCO.23.02510","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the use of radiation with radiosensitizing chemotherapy following repeated transurethral resection (trimodality therapy) as an alternative to radical cystectomy in T1 bladder cancer which has failed Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with recurrent T1 bladders who had failed BCG and were recommended to undergo cystectomy were treated with trimodality therapy. The primary end point was 3-year freedom from cystectomy. Secondary end points were distant metastasis at 3 and 5 years, local recurrence, disease-specific and overall survival (OS), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This single-arm phase II study enrolled 37 patients. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in 34 patients after three exclusions. The median follow-up was 5.1 years. The 3-year freedom from cystectomy rate was 88% (lower one-sided 97.5% confidence limit [CI], 72%), meeting the primary study goal. OS at 3 and 5 years was 69% (95% CI, 54 to 85) and 56% (95% CI, 39 to 74), respectively. The distant metastasis rates at 3 and 5 years were 12% (95% CI, 4 to 26) and 19% (95% CI, 7 to 34), respectively. Eight patients died due to urothelial cancer, 12 exhibited local recurrence at 3 years (cumulative incidence: 32%; 95% CI, 17 to 48), 18 experienced grade 3 adverse events, mostly hematological, and one developed grade 4 neutropenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trimodality therapy is an effective potential alternative to radical cystectomy for recurrent high-grade T1 urothelial cancer of the bladder. At 3 years, 88% of the patients remained free of cystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142125834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How We Monitor Cardiac Health in Breast Cancer Survivors. 我们如何监测乳腺癌幸存者的心脏健康?
IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00757
Suparna C Clasen, Meagan E Miller

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

肿瘤学大讲堂》系列旨在将期刊上发表的原创报告与临床相结合。在病例介绍之后,作者会描述诊断和管理方面的挑战、回顾相关文献,并总结建议的管理方法。本系列的目的是帮助读者更好地理解如何将主要研究(包括发表在《临床肿瘤学杂志》上的研究)的结果应用到自己临床实践中的患者身上。
{"title":"How We Monitor Cardiac Health in Breast Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Suparna C Clasen, Meagan E Miller","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00757","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00757","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the</i> Journal <i>into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in</i> Journal of Clinical Oncology<i>, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142125837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1