<p>Histopathological diagnosis is cognitively demanding, requiring complex pattern recognition, clinical integration, and decision-making under time pressure. A largely overlooked factor in dermatopathology is <i>decision fatigue</i>—the decline in decision quality after sustained cognitive effort. Well described in psychology, it reflects mental exhaustion that impairs information processing, risk assessment, and judgment [<span>1</span>]. Various psychological models attempt to explain this phenomenon and describe the mechanisms behind it. <i>Decision fatigue</i> describes a cognitive state in which the quality of decisions decreases after prolonged stress. This phenomenon was first described by Baumeister and colleagues as part of the theory of ego depletion. They postulate that the ability to self-regulate is a limited resource that can be depleted by prolonged cognitive effort. As a result of this depletion, individuals tend to make more impulsive decisions or avoid decisions altogether [<span>2</span>]. In clinical practice, for example, decision fatigue manifests itself in the tendency to prefer standard decisions or to postpone complex decisions. Studies show that medical staff under high decision-making pressure tend to make defensive decisions or order additional, possibly unnecessary, diagnostic tests more frequently. This may be due to reduced cognitive capacity exhausted by sustained decision-making demands. However, recent research suggests that the effects of decision fatigue are not exclusively due to the depletion of a limited self-regulatory resource. Rather, factors such as motivation, individual beliefs about one's own willpower, and external environmental conditions also play a decisive role. For example, studies show that people who are convinced that their willpower is unlimited are significantly less susceptible to typical symptoms of decision fatigue [<span>3, 4</span>]. Another key model for explaining decision fatigue is the System 1/System 2 model developed by Daniel Kahneman [<span>5</span>]. Kahneman distinguishes between two types of thinking: System 1, which is fast, intuitive, automatic, and emotionally controlled. System 1 requires little cognitive effort. System 2 is characterized by slow, analytical, controlled, rational thinking and requires high cognitive resources. According to Kahneman, decision fatigue leads people to increasingly fall back on the fast, intuitive System 1 because the more strenuous System 2 is already exhausted or is avoided to save energy. As a result, decisions are less well thought out, more influenced by heuristics or routines, and potentially more prone to error [<span>5</span>]. Regardless of the exact cause, however, the observation remains consistent that long phases of intensive cognitive stress—as are typical in everyday medical diagnosis—can lead to a measurable deterioration in the quality of decision-making [<span>6</span>]. These findings suggest a shift from a purely resourc
{"title":"Decision Fatigue in Dermatopathology: Cognitive Load and Diagnostic Vulnerability","authors":"Cornelia Sigrid Lissi Müller","doi":"10.1111/cup.14866","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cup.14866","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Histopathological diagnosis is cognitively demanding, requiring complex pattern recognition, clinical integration, and decision-making under time pressure. A largely overlooked factor in dermatopathology is <i>decision fatigue</i>—the decline in decision quality after sustained cognitive effort. Well described in psychology, it reflects mental exhaustion that impairs information processing, risk assessment, and judgment [<span>1</span>]. Various psychological models attempt to explain this phenomenon and describe the mechanisms behind it. <i>Decision fatigue</i> describes a cognitive state in which the quality of decisions decreases after prolonged stress. This phenomenon was first described by Baumeister and colleagues as part of the theory of ego depletion. They postulate that the ability to self-regulate is a limited resource that can be depleted by prolonged cognitive effort. As a result of this depletion, individuals tend to make more impulsive decisions or avoid decisions altogether [<span>2</span>]. In clinical practice, for example, decision fatigue manifests itself in the tendency to prefer standard decisions or to postpone complex decisions. Studies show that medical staff under high decision-making pressure tend to make defensive decisions or order additional, possibly unnecessary, diagnostic tests more frequently. This may be due to reduced cognitive capacity exhausted by sustained decision-making demands. However, recent research suggests that the effects of decision fatigue are not exclusively due to the depletion of a limited self-regulatory resource. Rather, factors such as motivation, individual beliefs about one's own willpower, and external environmental conditions also play a decisive role. For example, studies show that people who are convinced that their willpower is unlimited are significantly less susceptible to typical symptoms of decision fatigue [<span>3, 4</span>]. Another key model for explaining decision fatigue is the System 1/System 2 model developed by Daniel Kahneman [<span>5</span>]. Kahneman distinguishes between two types of thinking: System 1, which is fast, intuitive, automatic, and emotionally controlled. System 1 requires little cognitive effort. System 2 is characterized by slow, analytical, controlled, rational thinking and requires high cognitive resources. According to Kahneman, decision fatigue leads people to increasingly fall back on the fast, intuitive System 1 because the more strenuous System 2 is already exhausted or is avoided to save energy. As a result, decisions are less well thought out, more influenced by heuristics or routines, and potentially more prone to error [<span>5</span>]. Regardless of the exact cause, however, the observation remains consistent that long phases of intensive cognitive stress—as are typical in everyday medical diagnosis—can lead to a measurable deterioration in the quality of decision-making [<span>6</span>]. These findings suggest a shift from a purely resourc","PeriodicalId":15407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology","volume":"52 12","pages":"782-784"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cup.14866","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145040261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Chronological Changes in CD8\u0000 + T Cells and Granzyme B in Ulcerative Lesions During Mogamulizumab Therapy for Mycosis Fungoides","authors":"Ryoko Kimura, Kazunari Sugita, Yuichi Yoshida","doi":"10.1111/cup.14860","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cup.14860","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology","volume":"53 3","pages":"215-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145033420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}