Journal of Cystic Fibrosis最新文献

Background: Cystic Fibrosis has historically been described as a disease that affects people of European ancestry. Consequently, much of what we know about CF is based on evidence generated from data collected in white individuals. This may lead to systematic bias in how non-white people with CF are diagnosed and treated. In this study we compared clinical outcomes between the white and non-white people with CF in Canada.

Methods: Canadian CF Registry data collected between 2000 and 2019 were used in this population-based cohort study. Demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of people with CF identified as white and those identified as non-white were compared. Analyses were adjusted for cohort effects but not socioeconomic status.

Results: Between 2000 and 2019, 5516 people with CF in the Registry were identified as white and 323 were identified as non-white. At diagnosis, the white and non-white groups were similar with respect to sex at birth, age at diagnosis, prevalence of pancreatic insufficiency, and meconium ileus. The non-white group had similar rates of CF-related complications and bacterial infections compared to the white, but worse lung function, worse nutritional status, lower treatment rates, and higher rate of hospitalizations. During the 20-year study period, the non-white group had a 1.85 higher risk of death compared to the white group (HR 95 %CI 1.39; 2.47).

Interpretation: There is an urgent need understand why outcomes for Canadians with CF differ between white and non-white individuals, including the role of socioeconomic circumstances.

Specialized care is provided to people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) by interdisciplinary teams nested within the CF Foundation's accredited care center network. This network allows for standardization of the care model, implementation of clinical care guidelines, efficient communication, and outcomes reporting. Recent developments have impacted this care model. Increased access to CFTR modulator therapies has improved overall health for many, although not all pwCF. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid adoption of telemedicine and remote monitoring to ensure continuity of CF care. A collaboration of care providers, pwCF, and parent caregivers reevaluated key aspects of the current care model and considered potential modifications based on a widening range of needs. Available evidence was used to evaluate components of routine clinical practice and identify potential adaptations to care. The review included identification of patient characteristics warranting intensive monitoring, while embracing patient-centric care, and emphasizing the integration of telemedicine and at-home health technologies. Despite the changing landscape, the importance of the relationship between pwCF, their support system, and the care team was confirmed as a timeless and foundational aspect of the care model. Shared decision making, partnership, and coproduced care plans between pwCF and their CF care teams guide the best adaptations of the care model to support individual priorities and wellbeing. As health care advances and pwCF age, further research is needed to understand the impact of the care model on long-term health outcomes and to identify best practices that support pwCF to live longer healthier lives.

Introduction: Despite improved outcomes for many people with cystic fibrosis, there have been reports of adverse neuropsychiatric effects of modulator therapy. The aim of this research is to define temporal associations in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for available CFTR modulators.

Methods: Methods include an analysis of the UK Yellow Card Scheme data for ADRs through accessing interactive Drug Analysis Profiles (iDAPs) to define temporal trends in absolute and proportional counts.

Results: Since the introduction of ETI, there has been an increase in the absolute number of psychiatric ADRs reported as well as a statistically significant increase in the proportion of psychiatric ADRs in the pre-ETI and post-ETI periods.

Conclusion: In the post-ETI period, psychiatric ADRs are the most prevalent ADR reported via the Yellow Card scheme. Despite an unclear mechanism, there is significant clinical relevance in counselling and monitoring regarding psychiatric effects of CFTR modulator therapy.

The forskolin-induced swelling assay (FIS) in patient-derived intestinal organoids (PDIOs), used to determine in vitro responsiveness to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), showed variability in swelling among PDIOs obtained from people with CF (pwCF) carrying the same F508del/F508del CFTR genotype. We aimed to characterise the effect of ETI on the transcriptional activity of PDIOs-derived cells to understand the intracellular processes triggered by ETI and the differences in treatment response. Six high- and six low-responding PDIOs to ETI, derived from F508del/F508del pwCF, were incubated with or without ETI for 2 to 6 h. Gene expression was assessed using 3'-mRNA sequencing and modelled using negative binomial models. Incubation with ETI resulted in a significant upregulation of several biological processes: mostly related to chemokines and signalling, chemotaxis, and tissue development processes. No changes were observed in abundance of the CFTR transcripts or in CFTR-related gene sets and pathways. The genes and pathways associated with ETI did not overlap with those whose expression changed with time only. PDIOs with a high FIS response did not significantly differ in any interpretable gene from the FIS-low organoids. The changes in the PDIOs gene expression upon the exposure to ETI cannot explain differences in the magnitude of PDIOs FIS-measured response to ETI. In conclusion, on incubation with ETI, genes of the CFTR-related pathways do not change their transcriptional activity; instead, overexpression was observed in genes of inflammatory-like cytokine response and receptor activation pathways.

Background: Highly effective CFTR modulator therapy (HEMT) has improved the health of many people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF), offering opportunities to discontinue burdensome therapies. SIMPLIFY included randomized, controlled trials that confirmed non-inferiority of discontinuing versus continuing dornase alfa (DA) or hypertonic saline (HS) for 6 weeks in pwCF on HEMT. In this study of post-trial treatment use by SIMPLIFY participants, we hypothesized that randomization to discontinue DA or HS during the trial would be associated with a higher likelihood of non-use of each medication during follow-up.

Methods: We electronically surveyed SIMPLIFY participants every 4 weeks for 24 weeks after trial completion but before the main trial results were publicly disclosed. We asked them how often they used medications during the previous week. We estimated covariate-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of DA or HS non-use by logistic regression with generalized estimating equations.

Results: After exclusions mostly due to lack of any surveys, 472 participants were included in the analysis population, 181 from the HS trial and 291 from the DA trial. Approximately half of the analysis population completed all six surveys. At every month of follow-up in both trials, the percentage of individuals reporting non-use of DA or HS during the previous week was greater among those randomized to discontinue therapy. Among participants with responses at 24 weeks, 30/122 (24.6 %) in the HS trial and 79/222 (35.6 %) in the DA trial reported non-use of the respective study medication. After adjusting for covariates, participants randomized to discontinue DA were 8.7-times (95 % CI: 4.3-17.7) more likely to not use DA during follow-up than those randomized to continue DA, and participants randomized to discontinue HS were 5.2-times (95 % CI: 2.1-12.8) more likely to not use HS during follow-up compared to those randomized to continue.

Conclusions: In healthy pwCF on ETI, randomization to discontinue DA or HS during SIMPLIFY was associated with greater odds of not using each medication after the trial compared to randomization to continue. These findings suggest that participation in a treatment discontinuation trial can influence participants' post-trial treatment decisions. This possibility may be relevant during discussions about research participation and clinical care.

Background: Rapidly emerging clinical trends offer the opportunity to amend guidance on issues pertaining to CF care delivery. A national survey was conducted to gather perspectives on CF care including potential adaptations to the care model to best meet the needs of this population.

Methods: A survey instrument was developed to capture perspectives on CF care. People with CF (pwCF), including those post lung transplant, caregivers and care teams were surveyed. Descriptive statistics were calculated to characterize respondents and responses.

Results: In-person, routine visits with the CF care teams were valued by survey respondents. However, reduced in-person visit frequency from the standard three-month interval was supported for individuals in a stable state of health. This was particularly true for pwCF ages two or older and on a modulator. Lung function, pulmonary exacerbation frequency, and transition periods were noted to influence preference for visit frequency. Integrating telehealth with remote monitoring in between visits was broadly supported. For shared care between CF teams and other medical providers (transplant teams and primary care providers (PCP)), good communication, easily accessible health records, and convenient locations were important.

Conclusions: Survey findings support adapting CF care based on individual needs and life transitions. Themes identified can inform future areas of study and resource development to support successful modification of the CF care model and shared decision-making between patients and their care providers.