首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia最新文献

英文 中文
Early exposure to general anesthesia may contribute to later attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies 早期接触全身麻醉可能会导致日后出现注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD):队列研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111585
Hao Zhou , Wenyi Sun , Liuxian Ning , Jie Kang , Yadong Jin , Chaoxuan Dong

Study objective

The association between early childhood exposure to general anesthesia and subsequent risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder remains unknown.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Patients

Children undergoing general anesthesia.

Interventions

A comparison of any type of general anesthesia exposure, including total intravenous anesthesia, inhalation general anesthesia, and combined intravenous and inhaled anesthesia, with non-anesthetic exposures, which did not receive any exposure to anesthetic drugs, including general anesthetics as well as local anesthetics.

Measurements

The primary outcome measure was the risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder after general anesthesia exposure.

Main results

The results of the overall meta-analysis showed an increased risk of subsequent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children exposed to general anesthesia (RR = 1.26, 95% CI, 1.16–1.38; P < 0.001; I2 = 44.6%). Subgroup analysis found that a single exposure to general anesthesia in childhood was associated with an increased risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (RR = 1.29, 95% CI, 1.19–1.40, P < 0.001; I2 = 2.6%), and the risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was further increased after multiple general anesthesia exposures (RR = 1.61, 95% CI, 1.32–1.97, P < 0.001; I2 = 57.6%). Exposure to general anesthesia lasting 1–60 min during childhood is associated with an increased risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.26–1.51, P < 0.001; I2 = 0.0%). Moreover, with longer durations of exposure (61–120 min), the risk further rises (RR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.21–1.99, P = 0.001; I2 = 37.8%). However, no additional increase in ADHD risk was observed with exposures exceeding 120 min (RR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.35–1.79, P < 0.001; I2 = 0.0%).

Conclusions

Exposure to general anesthesia during early childhood increases the risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In particular, multiple general anesthesia exposures and exposures longer than 60 min significantly increase the risk of developing ADHD.

设计对队列研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。患者接受全身麻醉的儿童。干预措施对任何类型的全身麻醉暴露(包括全静脉麻醉、吸入式全身麻醉、静脉和吸入式联合麻醉)与非麻醉暴露(不接触任何麻醉药物,包括全身麻醉药和局部麻醉药)进行比较。主要结果总体荟萃分析结果显示,接触过全身麻醉的儿童随后出现注意力缺陷/多动症的风险增加(RR = 1.26,95% CI,1.16-1.38;P <;0.001;I2 = 44.6%)。亚组分析发现,儿童期单次接触全身麻醉与患注意力缺陷/多动障碍的风险增加有关(RR = 1.29,95% CI,1.19-1.40,P <0.001;I2 = 2.6%),多次接触全身麻醉后,患注意力缺陷/多动障碍的风险进一步增加(RR = 1.61,95% CI,1.32-1.97,P <0.001;I2 = 57.6%)。儿童期全身麻醉持续 1-60 分钟与注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)风险增加有关(RR:1.38,95% CI:1.26-1.51,P <0.001;I2 = 0.0%)。此外,接触时间越长(61-120 分钟),风险越高(RR:1.55,95% CI:1.21-1.99,P = 0.001;I2 = 37.8%)。结论幼儿期接触全身麻醉会增加患注意力缺陷/多动症的风险。结论幼儿期接触全身麻醉会增加患注意力缺陷/多动障碍的风险,尤其是多次接触全身麻醉和接触时间超过60分钟会显著增加患注意力缺陷/多动障碍的风险。
{"title":"Early exposure to general anesthesia may contribute to later attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies","authors":"Hao Zhou ,&nbsp;Wenyi Sun ,&nbsp;Liuxian Ning ,&nbsp;Jie Kang ,&nbsp;Yadong Jin ,&nbsp;Chaoxuan Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111585","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111585","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>The association between early childhood exposure to general anesthesia and subsequent risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Children undergoing general anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>A comparison of any type of general anesthesia exposure, including total intravenous anesthesia, inhalation general anesthesia, and combined intravenous and inhaled anesthesia, with non-anesthetic exposures, which did not receive any exposure to anesthetic drugs, including general anesthetics as well as local anesthetics.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome measure was the risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder after general anesthesia exposure.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The results of the overall meta-analysis showed an increased risk of subsequent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children exposed to general anesthesia (RR = 1.26, 95% CI, 1.16–1.38; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 44.6%). Subgroup analysis found that a single exposure to general anesthesia in childhood was associated with an increased risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (RR = 1.29, 95% CI, 1.19–1.40, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 2.6%), and the risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was further increased after multiple general anesthesia exposures (RR = 1.61, 95% CI, 1.32–1.97, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 57.6%). Exposure to general anesthesia lasting 1–60 min during childhood is associated with an increased risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.26–1.51, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%). Moreover, with longer durations of exposure (61–120 min), the risk further rises (RR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.21–1.99, <em>P</em> = 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 37.8%). However, no additional increase in ADHD risk was observed with exposures exceeding 120 min (RR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.35–1.79, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Exposure to general anesthesia during early childhood increases the risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In particular, multiple general anesthesia exposures and exposures longer than 60 min significantly increase the risk of developing ADHD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111585"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141993635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive perioperative blood management in patients undergoing elective bypass cardiac surgery: Benefit effect of health care education and systematic correction of iron deficiency and anemia on red blood cell transfusion 择期心脏搭桥手术患者围术期血液综合管理:保健教育和系统纠正缺铁和贫血对红细胞输注的益处
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111560
Hélène Charbonneau MD, PhD , Stéphanie Savy PhD , Nicolas Savy PhD , Marie Pasquié , Nicolas Mayeur MD, PhD , CP-PBM Study Group, Olivier Angles MD , Vincent Balech MD , Anne-Laure Berthelot MD , Madeleine Croute-Bayle MD , Isabelle Decramer MD , David Duterque MD , Valerie Julien MD , Laurent Mallet MD , Mimoun M'rini MD , Jean-François Quedreux MD , Benoit Richard MD , Laurent Sidobre MD , Laurence Taillefer MD , Adrien Thibaud MD , Giovanni Sciacca

Study objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a two-step patient blood management (PBM) program in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements among patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery.

Design

Prospective, non-randomized, two-step protocol design.

Setting

Cardiac surgery department of Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.

Patients

897 patients undergoing for elective CPB surgery.

Interventions

We conducted a two-steps protocol: PBMe and PBMc. PBMe involved a short quality improvement program for health care workers, while PBMc introduced a systematic approach to pre- and postoperative correction of deficiencies, incorporating iron injections, oral vitamins, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Measurements

The PBM program's effectiveness was evaluated through comparison with a pre-PBM retrospective cohort after propensity score matching. The primary objective was the proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusions during their hospital stay. Secondary objectives were also analyzed.

Main results

After matching, 343 patients were included in each group. Primary outcomes were observed in 35.7% (pre-PBM), 26.7% (PBMe), and 21.1% (PBMc) of patients, resulting in a significant reduction (40.6%) in the overall RBC transfusion rate. Both the PBMe and PBMc groups exhibited significantly lower risks of RBC transfusion compared to the pre-PBM group, with adjusted odds ratios of 0.59 [95% CI 0.44–0.79] and 0.44 [95% CI 0.32–0.60], respectively. Secondary endpoints included reductions in transfusions exceeding 2 units, total RBC units transfused, administration of allogeneic blood products, and total bleeding volume recorded on Day 1. There were no significant differences noted in mortality rates or the duration of hospital stays.

Conclusions

This study suggests that health care education and systematic deficiency correction are associated with reduced RBC transfusion rates in elective CPB surgery. However, further randomized, controlled studies are needed to validate these findings and refine their clinical application.

研究目的本研究旨在探讨两步式患者血液管理(PBM)计划对接受择期心肺旁路(CPB)手术的患者输注红细胞(RBC)需求的影响:我们采取了两步方案:PBMe 和 PBMc。PBMe包括一项针对医护人员的短期质量改进计划,而PBMc则引入了一种系统性的术前和术后缺陷纠正方法,包括注射铁剂、口服维生素和促红细胞生成剂。测量PBM计划的有效性是通过与PBM前的回顾性队列进行倾向得分匹配后评估的。主要目标是住院期间需要输注红细胞的患者比例。主要结果经匹配后,每组各有 343 名患者。35.7%(PBM 前)、26.7%(PBMe)和 21.1%(PBMc)的患者观察到了主要结果,从而使整体 RBC 输血率显著降低(40.6%)。与 PBM 前组相比,PBMe 组和 PBMc 组的 RBC 输血风险都明显降低,调整后的几率比分别为 0.59 [95% CI 0.44-0.79] 和 0.44 [95% CI 0.32-0.60]。次要终点包括输血量减少超过 2 个单位、输注的红细胞总数、异体血制品用量和第 1 天记录的总出血量。结论这项研究表明,在择期 CPB 手术中,医疗保健教育和系统性缺陷纠正与降低 RBC 输血率有关。然而,还需要进一步的随机对照研究来验证这些发现并完善其临床应用。
{"title":"Comprehensive perioperative blood management in patients undergoing elective bypass cardiac surgery: Benefit effect of health care education and systematic correction of iron deficiency and anemia on red blood cell transfusion","authors":"Hélène Charbonneau MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Savy PhD ,&nbsp;Nicolas Savy PhD ,&nbsp;Marie Pasquié ,&nbsp;Nicolas Mayeur MD, PhD ,&nbsp;CP-PBM Study Group,&nbsp;Olivier Angles MD ,&nbsp;Vincent Balech MD ,&nbsp;Anne-Laure Berthelot MD ,&nbsp;Madeleine Croute-Bayle MD ,&nbsp;Isabelle Decramer MD ,&nbsp;David Duterque MD ,&nbsp;Valerie Julien MD ,&nbsp;Laurent Mallet MD ,&nbsp;Mimoun M'rini MD ,&nbsp;Jean-François Quedreux MD ,&nbsp;Benoit Richard MD ,&nbsp;Laurent Sidobre MD ,&nbsp;Laurence Taillefer MD ,&nbsp;Adrien Thibaud MD ,&nbsp;Giovanni Sciacca","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111560","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111560","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a two-step patient blood management (PBM) program in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements among patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective, non-randomized, two-step protocol design.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Cardiac surgery department of Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>897 patients undergoing for elective CPB surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>We conducted a two-steps protocol: PBMe and PBMc. PBMe involved a short quality improvement program for health care workers, while PBMc introduced a systematic approach to pre- and postoperative correction of deficiencies, incorporating iron injections, oral vitamins, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The PBM program's effectiveness was evaluated through comparison with a pre-PBM retrospective cohort after propensity score matching. The primary objective was the proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusions during their hospital stay. Secondary objectives were also analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>After matching, 343 patients were included in each group. Primary outcomes were observed in 35.7% (pre-PBM), 26.7% (PBMe), and 21.1% (PBMc) of patients, resulting in a significant reduction (40.6%) in the overall RBC transfusion rate. Both the PBMe and PBMc groups exhibited significantly lower risks of RBC transfusion compared to the pre-PBM group, with adjusted odds ratios of 0.59 [95% CI 0.44–0.79] and 0.44 [95% CI 0.32–0.60], respectively. Secondary endpoints included reductions in transfusions exceeding 2 units, total RBC units transfused, administration of allogeneic blood products, and total bleeding volume recorded on Day 1. There were no significant differences noted in mortality rates or the duration of hospital stays.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study suggests that health care education and systematic deficiency correction are associated with reduced RBC transfusion rates in elective CPB surgery. However, further randomized, controlled studies are needed to validate these findings and refine their clinical application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111560"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141984863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of nitrous oxide use on parturient recall of neuraxial analgesia risks 一氧化二氮的使用对产妇回忆神经镇痛风险的影响。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111579
Emily E. Sharpe MD , Lindsay L. Warner MD , Benjamin D. Brakke DO , Paul R. Davis MD , David M. Finkel MD , Christopher M. Burkle MD, JD , Andrew C. Hanson MS , Rochelle J. Pompeian MD , Katherine W. Arendt MD , Yvonne S. Butler Tobah MD , Hans P. Sviggum MD

Study objective

Nitrous oxide affects memory and recall. We aimed to determine if using nitrous oxide during labor affected patients' ability to learn and recall the risks and benefits of neuraxial analgesia.

Design

Single-center, prospective cohort study.

Setting

Labor and delivery unit in a large academic medical center.

Patients

Nulliparous patients with spontaneous or planned induction of labor.

Interventions

Parturients chose whether to use nitrous oxide during labor. At the discussion for epidural consent, 4 risks were described: headache, infection, nerve damage, bleeding.

Measurements

Labor pain score, time from nitrous oxide discontinuation, and cervical dilation were documented at the discussion of epidural risks. Patients were assessed for unprompted recall and prompted recall of epidural risks on postpartum day 1 and unprompted recall at postpartum week 6. The number and proportion of patients who indicated each true risk (unprompted and prompted recall) or distractor (prompted recall only) were summarized by treatment group and results compared using Pearson χ2 tests.

Main results

Of the 403 enrolled patients, 294 (73%) did not use nitrous oxide, and 109 (27%) did. The 2 groups were similar except women who used nitrous oxide were more likely to be cared for by midwives and had higher pain scores at their epidural request. Scores for unprompted or prompted recall of epidural risks were not different between women who received or did not receive nitrous oxide. All 4 risks were recalled unprompted by only 3% in the nitrous oxide group and by 6% in the group not receiving nitrous oxide (P = .18).

Conclusions

The use of nitrous oxide for labor analgesia does not adversely influence a parturient's ability to recall the risks of epidural placement. Patients who receive nitrous oxide for labor analgesia should be considered eligible to provide consent for subsequent procedures.

研究目的一氧化二氮会影响记忆和回忆。我们旨在确定在分娩过程中使用一氧化二氮是否会影响患者学习和回忆神经镇痛风险和益处的能力:单中心、前瞻性队列研究:地点:一家大型学术医疗中心的产房:患者:自然引产或计划引产的无阴道患者:产妇选择是否在分娩过程中使用一氧化二氮。在讨论是否同意硬膜外麻醉时,描述了4种风险:头痛、感染、神经损伤、出血:在讨论硬膜外麻醉风险时记录分娩疼痛评分、停止使用一氧化二氮的时间和宫颈扩张情况。在产后第 1 天对患者进行无提示回忆和提示回忆硬膜外风险评估,在产后第 6 周进行无提示回忆评估。按治疗组总结了指出每种真实风险(无提示回忆和提示回忆)或干扰因素(仅提示回忆)的患者人数和比例,并使用 Pearson χ2 检验对结果进行比较:在 403 名注册患者中,294 人(73%)未使用一氧化二氮,109 人(27%)使用了一氧化二氮。两组患者的情况相似,但使用一氧化二氮的女性更有可能由助产士护理,且在要求硬膜外麻醉时疼痛评分更高。接受或未接受一氧化二氮的产妇在未经提示或提示下回忆硬膜外麻醉风险的得分没有差异。氧化亚氮组仅有3%的产妇在未提示的情况下回忆起所有4种风险,而未接受氧化亚氮的产妇则有6%(P = .18):结论:使用一氧化二氮进行分娩镇痛不会对产妇回忆硬膜外置管风险的能力产生不利影响。接受一氧化二氮分娩镇痛的患者应被视为有资格对后续手术表示同意。
{"title":"Impact of nitrous oxide use on parturient recall of neuraxial analgesia risks","authors":"Emily E. Sharpe MD ,&nbsp;Lindsay L. Warner MD ,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Brakke DO ,&nbsp;Paul R. Davis MD ,&nbsp;David M. Finkel MD ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Burkle MD, JD ,&nbsp;Andrew C. Hanson MS ,&nbsp;Rochelle J. Pompeian MD ,&nbsp;Katherine W. Arendt MD ,&nbsp;Yvonne S. Butler Tobah MD ,&nbsp;Hans P. Sviggum MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111579","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111579","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>Nitrous oxide affects memory and recall. We aimed to determine if using nitrous oxide during labor affected patients' ability to learn and recall the risks and benefits of neuraxial analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Single-center, prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Labor and delivery unit in a large academic medical center.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Nulliparous patients with spontaneous or planned induction of labor.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Parturients chose whether to use nitrous oxide during labor. At the discussion for epidural consent, 4 risks were described: headache, infection, nerve damage, bleeding.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>Labor pain score, time from nitrous oxide discontinuation, and cervical dilation were documented at the discussion of epidural risks. Patients were assessed for unprompted recall and prompted recall of epidural risks on postpartum day 1 and unprompted recall at postpartum week 6. The number and proportion of patients who indicated each true risk (unprompted and prompted recall) or distractor (prompted recall only) were summarized by treatment group and results compared using Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>Of the 403 enrolled patients, 294 (73%) did not use nitrous oxide, and 109 (27%) did. The 2 groups were similar except women who used nitrous oxide were more likely to be cared for by midwives and had higher pain scores at their epidural request. Scores for unprompted or prompted recall of epidural risks were not different between women who received or did not receive nitrous oxide. All 4 risks were recalled unprompted by only 3% in the nitrous oxide group and by 6% in the group not receiving nitrous oxide (<em>P</em> = .18).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of nitrous oxide for labor analgesia does not adversely influence a parturient's ability to recall the risks of epidural placement. Patients who receive nitrous oxide for labor analgesia should be considered eligible to provide consent for subsequent procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111579"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141916859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In response 作为回应。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111555
Zhen Zhang , Dong-Xin Wang
{"title":"In response","authors":"Zhen Zhang ,&nbsp;Dong-Xin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111555","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111555","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111555"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141916860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the editor regarding “Low intraoperative end-tidal carbon dioxide levels are associated with improved recurrence-free survival after elective colorectal cancer surgery” 致编辑的信,内容涉及 "术中低潮气末二氧化碳水平与提高择期结直肠癌手术后无复发生存率有关"。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111577
Fanli Liu MD , Xiaocou Wang MD , Pinguo Fu MD
{"title":"Letter to the editor regarding “Low intraoperative end-tidal carbon dioxide levels are associated with improved recurrence-free survival after elective colorectal cancer surgery”","authors":"Fanli Liu MD ,&nbsp;Xiaocou Wang MD ,&nbsp;Pinguo Fu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111577","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111577","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111577"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141912858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 对接受择期手术的儿科患者进行竖脊肌平面阻滞的镇痛效果和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和 Meta 分析。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111575
So Mee Park MD , Hyo Sung Kim MD , Byung Gun Lim MD, PhD

Study objective

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is commonly used for perioperative analgesia in adults; however, its analgesic efficacy and safety in pediatric patients remain uncertain. This review aimed to determine whether ultrasound-guided ESPB can improve analgesic efficacy and safety in pediatric surgery.

Design

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Setting

Perioperative setting.

Patients

Pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Interventions

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, KoreaMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for eligible published randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing ESPB with controls (no block or other block) in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Measurements

The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption after surgery. Other outcomes included intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first request for rescue analgesia, number of patients requiring rescue analgesics, and pain scores after surgery. The safety outcomes were the incidences of bradycardia, hypotension, and postoperative vomiting.

Main results

The analysis included 17 RCTs comprising 919 participants: 461 in the ESPB group, 269 in the no-block group (no block/sham block), and 189 in the other block group. Compared with the control group (no block and other blocks), ESPB significantly reduced the cumulative opioid consumption (intravenous morphine milligram equivalents) after surgery (standardized mean difference = −1.51; 95% confidence interval, −2.39 to −0.64; P = 0.0002; I2 = 92.9%) and intraoperative opioid consumption, and lowered average pain scores up to 24 h after surgery. ESPB extended the time to the first request for rescue analgesia and decreased the number of patients requiring rescue analgesics. Furthermore, ESPB lowered the pain score at most time points for 24 h after surgery, improved parental satisfaction, and reduced the incidence of postoperative vomiting compared with that in no block/sham block.

Conclusions

ESPB provides effective and safe perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

研究目的超声引导下竖脊平面阻滞(ESPB)常用于成人围术期镇痛,但其在儿科患者中的镇痛效果和安全性仍不确定。本综述旨在确定超声引导下的直立脊平面阻滞是否能提高小儿手术的镇痛效果和安全性:设计:随机对照试验的 Meta 分析:围手术期环境:患者:在全身麻醉下接受择期手术的小儿患者:我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央登记册、Cochrane系统综述数据库、KoreaMed、Web of Science、Scopus和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库,以寻找符合条件的已发表随机对照研究(RCT),这些研究比较了ESPB与对照组(无阻滞或其他阻滞)在全身麻醉下接受择期手术的儿科患者中的应用情况:主要结果是术后阿片类药物的累积用量。其他结果包括术中阿片类药物消耗量、首次请求镇痛抢救的时间、需要镇痛抢救的患者人数以及术后疼痛评分。安全性结果包括心动过缓、低血压和术后呕吐的发生率:主要结果:分析包括 17 项 RCT,共有 919 名参与者:ESPB组461人,无阻滞组(无阻滞/肱阻滞)269人,其他阻滞组189人。与对照组(无阻滞和其他阻滞)相比,ESPB显著减少了术后阿片类药物的累积用量(静脉注射吗啡毫克当量)(标准化平均差=-1.51;95%置信区间,-2.39至-0.64;P=0.0002;I2=92.9%)和术中阿片类药物的用量,并降低了术后24小时内的平均疼痛评分。ESPB延长了首次请求镇痛抢救的时间,减少了需要镇痛抢救的患者人数。此外,与无阻滞/肱阻滞相比,ESPB降低了术后24小时内大部分时间点的疼痛评分,提高了家长的满意度,并减少了术后呕吐的发生率:ESPB可为在全身麻醉下接受择期手术的小儿患者提供有效、安全的围术期镇痛。
{"title":"Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"So Mee Park MD ,&nbsp;Hyo Sung Kim MD ,&nbsp;Byung Gun Lim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111575","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111575","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is commonly used for perioperative analgesia in adults; however, its analgesic efficacy and safety in pediatric patients remain uncertain. This review aimed to determine whether ultrasound-guided ESPB can improve analgesic efficacy and safety in pediatric surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Perioperative setting.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, KoreaMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> databases for eligible published randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing ESPB with controls (no block or other block) in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption after surgery. Other outcomes included intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first request for rescue analgesia, number of patients requiring rescue analgesics, and pain scores after surgery. The safety outcomes were the incidences of bradycardia, hypotension, and postoperative vomiting.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The analysis included 17 RCTs comprising 919 participants: 461 in the ESPB group, 269 in the no-block group (no block/sham block), and 189 in the other block group. Compared with the control group (no block and other blocks), ESPB significantly reduced the cumulative opioid consumption (intravenous morphine milligram equivalents) after surgery (standardized mean difference = −1.51; 95% confidence interval, −2.39 to −0.64; <em>P</em> = 0.0002; I<sup>2</sup> = 92.9%) and intraoperative opioid consumption, and lowered average pain scores up to 24 h after surgery. ESPB extended the time to the first request for rescue analgesia and decreased the number of patients requiring rescue analgesics. Furthermore, ESPB lowered the pain score at most time points for 24 h after surgery, improved parental satisfaction, and reduced the incidence of postoperative vomiting compared with that in no block/sham block.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ESPB provides effective and safe perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111575"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141916858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial 瑞马唑仑与异丙酚对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者麻醉诱导后低血压的影响:随机对照试验。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111580
Jae-Woo Ju , Dong Ju Lee , Jaeyeon Chung , Seohee Lee , Youn Joung Cho , Yunseok Jeon , Karam Nam

Study Objective

There is scarce evidence on the hemodynamic stability of remimazolam during anesthetic induction in patients with significant coronary artery disease. This study aims to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Tertiary teaching hospital.

Patients

Adult patients undergoing isolated CABG.

Interventions

Patients were randomly allocated to received either remimazolam (n = 50) or propofol (n = 50) for anesthetic induction. The remimazolam group received an initial infusion at 6 mg/kg/h, which was later adjusted to 1–2 mg/kg/h to maintain a bispectral index of 40–60 after loss of consciousness. In the propofol group, a 1.5 mg/kg bolus of propofol was administered, followed by 1–1.5% sevoflurane inhalation as needed to achieve the target bispectral index.

Measurements

The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) below the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the first 10 min after anesthetic induction. Secondary outcomes included the AUC for MAP <65 mmHg and the requirement for vasopressors.

Main Results

The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly lower AUC under the baseline MAP compared to the propofol group (mean [SD], 169.8 [101.0] mmHg·min vs. 220.6 [102.4] mmHg·min; mean difference [95% confidence interval], 50.8 [10.4–91.2] mmHg·min; P = 0.014). Additionally, the remimazolam group had a reduced AUC for MAP <65 mmHg (7.3 [10.3] mmHg·min vs. 13.9 [14.9] mmHg·min; P = 0.007) and a lower frequency of vasopressor use compared to the propofol group (60% vs. 88%, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Remimazolam may offer improved hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in patients undergoing CABG, suggesting its potential advantage over propofol for patients with significant coronary artery disease in terms of hemodynamic stability.

研究目的:目前尚无证据表明,在对患有严重冠状动脉疾病的患者进行麻醉诱导时,瑞马唑仑能稳定血流动力学。本研究旨在比较瑞马唑仑和异丙酚对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者诱导后低血压的影响:随机对照试验:地点:三级教学医院干预:随机分配患者接受瑞马唑仑(50 人)或异丙酚(50 人)麻醉诱导。雷马唑仑组的初始输注量为 6 毫克/千克/小时,之后调整为 1-2 毫克/千克/小时,以便在意识丧失后将双频谱指数维持在 40-60 之间。在异丙酚组,先注射1.5毫克/千克的异丙酚,然后根据需要吸入1-1.5%的七氟醚,以达到目标双光谱指数:主要结果是麻醉诱导后 10 分钟内低于基线平均动脉压 (MAP) 的曲线下面积 (AUC)。次要结果包括 MAP 的 AUC 主要结果:与异丙酚组相比,雷马唑仑组的基线平均动脉压曲线下的 AUC 明显更低(平均值 [SD], 169.8 [101.0] mmHg-min vs. 220.6 [102.4] mmHg-min;平均差 [95% 置信区间], 50.8 [10.4-91.2] mmHg-min;P = 0.014)。此外,雷马唑仑组的 MAP AUC 也有所降低:雷马唑仑可改善接受 CABG 手术患者麻醉诱导期间的血流动力学稳定性,这表明对于患有严重冠状动脉疾病的患者,雷马唑仑在血流动力学稳定性方面可能比丙泊酚更有优势。
{"title":"Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Jae-Woo Ju ,&nbsp;Dong Ju Lee ,&nbsp;Jaeyeon Chung ,&nbsp;Seohee Lee ,&nbsp;Youn Joung Cho ,&nbsp;Yunseok Jeon ,&nbsp;Karam Nam","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111580","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111580","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><p>There is scarce evidence on the hemodynamic stability of remimazolam during anesthetic induction in patients with significant coronary artery disease. This study aims to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Tertiary teaching hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Adult patients undergoing isolated CABG.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients were randomly allocated to received either remimazolam (<em>n</em> = 50) or propofol (n = 50) for anesthetic induction. The remimazolam group received an initial infusion at 6 mg/kg/h, which was later adjusted to 1–2 mg/kg/h to maintain a bispectral index of 40–60 after loss of consciousness. In the propofol group, a 1.5 mg/kg bolus of propofol was administered, followed by 1–1.5% sevoflurane inhalation as needed to achieve the target bispectral index.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) below the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the first 10 min after anesthetic induction. Secondary outcomes included the AUC for MAP &lt;65 mmHg and the requirement for vasopressors.</p></div><div><h3>Main Results</h3><p>The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly lower AUC under the baseline MAP compared to the propofol group (mean [SD], 169.8 [101.0] mmHg·min vs. 220.6 [102.4] mmHg·min; mean difference [95% confidence interval], 50.8 [10.4–91.2] mmHg·min; <em>P</em> = 0.014). Additionally, the remimazolam group had a reduced AUC for MAP &lt;65 mmHg (7.3 [10.3] mmHg·min vs. 13.9 [14.9] mmHg·min; <em>P</em> = 0.007) and a lower frequency of vasopressor use compared to the propofol group (60% vs. 88%, <em>P</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Remimazolam may offer improved hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in patients undergoing CABG, suggesting its potential advantage over propofol for patients with significant coronary artery disease in terms of hemodynamic stability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111580"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141912856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia and postoperative recovery in older adults undergoing minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgery – A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, clinical trial 接受轻度至中度风险非心脏手术的老年人的去氟烷与七氟烷麻醉及术后恢复--一项前瞻性、随机、观察者盲法临床试验。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111576
Alexander Taschner (M.D.) , Edith Fleischmann (M.D.) , Katharina Horvath (M.D.) , Nikolas Adamowitsch (M.D.) , David Emler (M.D.) , Thomas Christian (M.D.) , Nicole Hantakova (M.D.) , Beatrix Hochreiter (BSc.) , Laura Höfer (M.S.) , Magdalena List (M.S.) , Barbara Rossi (M.S.) , Florian W. Zenz (M.S.) , Giulia Zanvettor (M.S.) , Oliver Zotti (M.S.) , Alexandra Graf (Ph.D.) , Melanie Fraunschiel (MSc.) , Christian Reiterer (M.D., Ph.D.)

Study objective

The effect of volatile anesthetics on postoperative recovery in older adults is still not entirely clear. Thus, we evaluated the effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia on speed of postoperative recovery in older adults eligible for same-day discharge. We further evaluated the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), bispectral index (BIS) values, and S100B concentrations.

Design

Single-center, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Setting

Operating room.

Patients

190 patients ≥65 years of age and scheduled for minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgeries.

Interventions

Goal-directed administration of desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia with an intraoperative goal of BIS 50 ± 5.

Measurements

The primary outcome was the time to anesthesia recovery, which was defined as the time between arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and reaching criteria for discharge from PACU, based on modified Aldrete score ≥ 12 points. Modified Aldrete scores were assessed at PACU arrival and thereafter in five-minute intervals. PONV was evaluated during PACU stay and the first three postoperative days, BIS values were recorded during PACU stay, and S100B values were measured before and after surgery, and on the second postoperative day.

Main results

95 patients were randomized to receive desflurane, and 95 patients to receive sevoflurane. We did not observe a significant difference in median duration of postoperative recovery between the groups (desflurane: 0 min [0;0]; sevoflurane: 0 min [0;0]; p = 0.245). 77 patients (81.1%) in the desflurane group and 84 patients (88.4%) in the sevoflurane group already had Aldrete scores ≥12 points upon arrival at PACU (p = 0.277). There was also no significant difference in the incidences of PONV (p = 0.606), postoperative BIS values (p = 0.197), and postoperative maximum S100B concentrations (p = 0.821) between the groups.

Conclusions

Despite previous reports, we did not observe significant faster recovery times after desflurane anesthesia. Both volatile anesthetics may be appropriate for same-day discharge in older adults.

研究目的挥发性麻醉剂对老年人术后恢复的影响尚不完全清楚。因此,我们评估了地氟醚与七氟醚麻醉对符合当天出院条件的老年人术后恢复速度的影响。我们进一步评估了术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的发生率、双频谱指数(BIS)值和 S100B 浓度:设计:单中心、前瞻性、观察者盲法、随机临床试验:患者190名年龄≥65岁、计划接受轻度至中度风险非心脏手术的患者:干预措施:在目标引导下使用地氟醚与七氟醚维持麻醉,术中目标为BIS 50 ± 5:主要结果是麻醉恢复时间,即到达麻醉后护理病房(PACU)到达到 PACU 出院标准之间的时间(基于修正的 Aldrete 评分≥ 12 分)。改良 Aldrete 评分在患者到达 PACU 时进行评估,之后每隔 5 分钟评估一次。在 PACU 住院期间和术后前三天评估 PONV,在 PACU 住院期间记录 BIS 值,在手术前后和术后第二天测量 S100B 值:95名患者随机接受地氟醚治疗,95名患者随机接受七氟醚治疗。我们没有观察到两组患者术后恢复的中位时间有明显差异(地氟烷:0 min [0;0];七氟烷:0 min [0;0];P = 0.245)。到达 PACU 时,地氟醚组有 77 名患者(81.1%)和七氟醚组有 84 名患者(88.4%)的 Aldrete 评分已≥12 分(p = 0.277)。两组间的 PONV 发生率(p = 0.606)、术后 BIS 值(p = 0.197)和术后 S100B 最大浓度(p = 0.821)也无明显差异:结论:尽管之前已有报道,但我们并未观察到地氟醚麻醉后恢复时间明显加快。两种挥发性麻醉药都适合老年人当天出院。
{"title":"Desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia and postoperative recovery in older adults undergoing minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgery – A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, clinical trial","authors":"Alexander Taschner (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Edith Fleischmann (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Katharina Horvath (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Nikolas Adamowitsch (M.D.) ,&nbsp;David Emler (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Thomas Christian (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Nicole Hantakova (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Beatrix Hochreiter (BSc.) ,&nbsp;Laura Höfer (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Magdalena List (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Barbara Rossi (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Florian W. Zenz (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Giulia Zanvettor (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Oliver Zotti (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Alexandra Graf (Ph.D.) ,&nbsp;Melanie Fraunschiel (MSc.) ,&nbsp;Christian Reiterer (M.D., Ph.D.)","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111576","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111576","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>The effect of volatile anesthetics on postoperative recovery in older adults is still not entirely clear. Thus, we evaluated the effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia on speed of postoperative recovery in older adults eligible for same-day discharge. We further evaluated the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), bispectral index (BIS) values, and S100<img>B concentrations.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Single-center, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Operating room.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>190 patients ≥65 years of age and scheduled for minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Goal-directed administration of desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia with an intraoperative goal of BIS 50 ± 5.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was the time to anesthesia recovery, which was defined as the time between arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and reaching criteria for discharge from PACU, based on modified Aldrete score ≥ 12 points. Modified Aldrete scores were assessed at PACU arrival and thereafter in five-minute intervals. PONV was evaluated during PACU stay and the first three postoperative days, BIS values were recorded during PACU stay, and S100<img>B values were measured before and after surgery, and on the second postoperative day.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>95 patients were randomized to receive desflurane, and 95 patients to receive sevoflurane. We did not observe a significant difference in median duration of postoperative recovery between the groups (desflurane: 0 min [0;0]; sevoflurane: 0 min [0;0]; <em>p</em> = 0.245). 77 patients (81.1%) in the desflurane group and 84 patients (88.4%) in the sevoflurane group already had Aldrete scores ≥12 points upon arrival at PACU (<em>p</em> = 0.277). There was also no significant difference in the incidences of PONV (<em>p</em> = 0.606), postoperative BIS values (<em>p</em> = 0.197), and postoperative maximum S100<img>B concentrations (<em>p</em> = 0.821) between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite previous reports, we did not observe significant faster recovery times after desflurane anesthesia. Both volatile anesthetics may be appropriate for same-day discharge in older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111576"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002058/pdfft?md5=72f9f53f0ec76c4b2ddf1fe26c5b4bd3&pid=1-s2.0-S0952818024002058-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141912855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of preoperative QTc interval prolongation on short-term postoperative outcomes: A retrospective study 术前 QTc 间期延长对术后短期预后的影响:一项回顾性研究。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111574
Chun-Ning Ho , Wei-Chu Chung , Chia-Li Kao , Chih-Wei Hsu , Kuo-Chuan Hung , Chia-Hung Yu , Jen-Yin Chen , I-Wen Chen

Study objective

Although a prolonged heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTcI) is associated with an increased risk of mortality in the general population, its prognostic value in surgical patients remains unclear. We aimed to examine whether preoperative QTcI prolongation predicts short-term postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Design

The study was a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX network database.

Setting

Operating room.

Intervention

Assessment and categorization of preoperative QTcI.

Patients

Data of patients aged ≥65 years who underwent non-cardiac surgery between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed.

Measurements

Patients were categorized into four groups based on preoperative QTcI: long (500-600 ms), borderline (460-500 ms), high-normal (420-460 ms) and control (370-420 ms) groups. The groups were compared using a propensity score-matched analysis. The primary outcome was the all-cause 90-day mortality risk. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risks of postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (Af), ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), emergency visits, hospital readmissions, and pneumonia.

Results

In total, data on 519,929 patients were collected in this study. Pairwise comparisons showed that all QTcI prolongation groups demonstrated a heightened incidence of postoperative mortality, arrhythmias, and other complications compared to the control group. Patients with a long QTcI had a 3-fold higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.124, p < 0.001), Af (HR = 3.059, p < 0.001), and VAs (HR = 3.617, p < 0.001) than controls. The risks of emergency visits (HR = 1.287, p < 0.001), hospital readmissions (HR = 1.591, p < 0.001), and pneumonia (HR = 1.672, p < 0.001) were also higher in the long QTcI group than in the control group. A dose-dependent response was evident between QTcI and mortality as well as arrhythmia risk.

Conclusion

Preoperative QTcI screening effectively risk-stratifies elderly surgical patients, with a QTcI≥500 ms being strongly predictive of short-term postoperative mortality and other complications. Incorporating QTcI assessment into the preoperative evaluation may guide perioperative monitoring and management.

研究目的尽管在普通人群中,心率校正 QT 间期(QTcI)延长与死亡风险增加有关,但其在外科手术患者中的预后价值仍不明确。我们旨在研究术前 QTcI 间期延长是否能预测接受非心脏手术的老年患者术后的短期预后:该研究是一项使用 TriNetX 网络数据库进行的回顾性分析:干预措施干预措施:对术前 QTcI 进行评估和分类:研究分析了 2010 年至 2023 年期间年龄≥65 岁、接受非心脏手术的患者数据:根据术前 QTcI 将患者分为四组:长 QTcI 组(500-600 毫秒)、边缘 QTcI 组(460-500 毫秒)、高正常 QTcI 组(420-460 毫秒)和对照 QTcI 组(370-420 毫秒)。各组之间采用倾向得分匹配分析法进行比较。主要结果是全因 90 天死亡风险。次要结果包括术后 90 天内新发心房颤动(Af)、室性心律失常(VAs)、急诊就诊、再入院和肺炎的风险:本研究共收集了 519,929 名患者的数据。配对比较显示,与对照组相比,所有 QTcI 延长组的术后死亡率、心律失常和其他并发症的发生率均有所上升。QTcI过长患者的死亡风险是对照组的3倍(危险比[HR] = 3.124,p 结论:QTcI过长患者的死亡风险是对照组的3倍(危险比[HR] = 3.124,p 结论):术前 QTcI 筛查可有效地对老年手术患者进行风险分层,QTcI≥500 毫秒可有力地预测术后短期死亡率和其他并发症。将 QTcI 评估纳入术前评估可为围术期监测和管理提供指导。
{"title":"Impact of preoperative QTc interval prolongation on short-term postoperative outcomes: A retrospective study","authors":"Chun-Ning Ho ,&nbsp;Wei-Chu Chung ,&nbsp;Chia-Li Kao ,&nbsp;Chih-Wei Hsu ,&nbsp;Kuo-Chuan Hung ,&nbsp;Chia-Hung Yu ,&nbsp;Jen-Yin Chen ,&nbsp;I-Wen Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111574","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111574","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>Although a prolonged heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTcI) is associated with an increased risk of mortality in the general population, its prognostic value in surgical patients remains unclear. We aimed to examine whether preoperative QTcI prolongation predicts short-term postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The study was a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX network database.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Operating room.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Assessment and categorization of preoperative QTcI.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Data of patients aged ≥65 years who underwent non-cardiac surgery between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>Patients were categorized into four groups based on preoperative QTcI: long (500-600 ms), borderline (460-500 ms), high-normal (420-460 ms) and control (370-420 ms) groups. The groups were compared using a propensity score-matched analysis. The primary outcome was the all-cause 90-day mortality risk. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risks of postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (Af), ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), emergency visits, hospital readmissions, and pneumonia.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, data on 519,929 patients were collected in this study. Pairwise comparisons showed that all QTcI prolongation groups demonstrated a heightened incidence of postoperative mortality, arrhythmias, and other complications compared to the control group. Patients with a long QTcI had a 3-fold higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.124, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), Af (HR = 3.059, p &lt; 0.001), and VAs (HR = 3.617, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) than controls. The risks of emergency visits (HR = 1.287, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), hospital readmissions (HR = 1.591, p &lt; 0.001), and pneumonia (HR = 1.672, p &lt; 0.001) were also higher in the long QTcI group than in the control group. A dose-dependent response was evident between QTcI and mortality as well as arrhythmia risk.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoperative QTcI screening effectively risk-stratifies elderly surgical patients, with a QTcI≥500 ms being strongly predictive of short-term postoperative mortality and other complications. Incorporating QTcI assessment into the preoperative evaluation may guide perioperative monitoring and management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111574"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141912857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Variable volume-controlled ventilation: Did we find the needle in the haystack? 可变通气量控制:我们找到大海捞针的方法了吗?
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111568
Alessia Pedoto MD, FASA , Mohamed R. El Tahan MD
{"title":"Variable volume-controlled ventilation: Did we find the needle in the haystack?","authors":"Alessia Pedoto MD, FASA ,&nbsp;Mohamed R. El Tahan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111568","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111568","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 111568"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141901985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1