Chikungunya fever is an acute infectious disease caused by chikungunya virus (CHIKV), which is transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes. Simple, rapid, and sensitive detection of CHIKV is critical for its prevention and spread. To address this issue, we combined one-tube, reverse transcription semi-nested, multi-enzyme isothermal rapid amplification, and lateral flow dipstick strips assay to detect CHIKV RNA. The study used a 318-bp gene fragment of CHIKV NSP4 as the target of the assay. This method of amplification takes 30 min for two-step amplification at 39°C. The dilution of amplification products was added to the LFD strip with results visible to the naked eye after 10 min. The method has a sensitivity of 1 copy/μL for the detection of CHIKV RNA, which is 100-fold higher than the conventional reverse transcription-multi-enzyme isothermal rapid amplification and 10-fold higher than the reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) method. In addition, the method demonstrated good specificity and a better detection rate (85.7%, 18 of 21) than RT-qPCR (80.9%, 17 of 21) in clinically confirmed patient plasma samples. Thus, the rapid CHIKV RNA assay developed in this study will be an important tool for the rapid and accurate screening of patients for chikungunya fever.
Importance: This study presents a new one-tube, reverse transcription semi-nested, multi-enzyme isothermal rapid amplification assay combined with lateral flow dipstick strips for the detection of CHIKV. This technique significantly improves sensitivity and outperforms RT-qPCR for the detection of CHIKV, especially in samples with low viral loads. It is also significantly faster than conventional RT-qPCR and does not require special equipment or a standard PCR laboratory. The combination of the isothermal amplification technology developed in this study with point-of-care molecular testing offers the potential for rapid, on-site, low-cost molecular diagnosis of CHIKV.
{"title":"Rapid and sensitive detection of chikungunya virus using one-tube, reverse transcription, semi-nested multi-enzyme isothermal rapid amplification, and lateral flow dipstick assays.","authors":"Xinlin Wu, Gaowen Liu, Yingchao Chang, Mengyuan Zheng, Li Liu, Xueshan Xia, Yue Feng","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00383-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00383-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chikungunya fever is an acute infectious disease caused by chikungunya virus (CHIKV), which is transmitted by <i>Aedes</i> mosquitoes. Simple, rapid, and sensitive detection of CHIKV is critical for its prevention and spread. To address this issue, we combined one-tube, reverse transcription semi-nested, multi-enzyme isothermal rapid amplification, and lateral flow dipstick strips assay to detect CHIKV RNA. The study used a 318-bp gene fragment of CHIKV NSP4 as the target of the assay. This method of amplification takes 30 min for two-step amplification at 39°C. The dilution of amplification products was added to the LFD strip with results visible to the naked eye after 10 min. The method has a sensitivity of 1 copy/μL for the detection of CHIKV RNA, which is 100-fold higher than the conventional reverse transcription-multi-enzyme isothermal rapid amplification and 10-fold higher than the reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) method. In addition, the method demonstrated good specificity and a better detection rate (85.7%, 18 of 21) than RT-qPCR (80.9%, 17 of 21) in clinically confirmed patient plasma samples. Thus, the rapid CHIKV RNA assay developed in this study will be an important tool for the rapid and accurate screening of patients for chikungunya fever.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>This study presents a new one-tube, reverse transcription semi-nested, multi-enzyme isothermal rapid amplification assay combined with lateral flow dipstick strips for the detection of CHIKV. This technique significantly improves sensitivity and outperforms RT-qPCR for the detection of CHIKV, especially in samples with low viral loads. It is also significantly faster than conventional RT-qPCR and does not require special equipment or a standard PCR laboratory. The combination of the isothermal amplification technology developed in this study with point-of-care molecular testing offers the potential for rapid, on-site, low-cost molecular diagnosis of CHIKV.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0038324"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389142/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141975830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-11Epub Date: 2024-08-19DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01164-24
Amy L Leber
{"title":"Erratum for Leber, \"Maternal and congenital human cytomegalovirus infection: laboratory testing for detection and diagnosis\".","authors":"Amy L Leber","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01164-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.01164-24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0116424"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389139/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142000061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amy L. LeberSophonie J. OyeniranHuanyu Wang1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital and The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA3Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USAErik Munson
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Ahead of Print.
临床微生物学杂志》,提前出版。
{"title":"Reduced sensitivity of a multiplex commercial respiratory panel for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae is due to specimen type","authors":"Amy L. LeberSophonie J. OyeniranHuanyu Wang1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital and The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA3Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USAErik Munson","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01139-24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01139-24","url":null,"abstract":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Ahead of Print. <br/>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142176576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-14Epub Date: 2024-07-11DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00551-24
Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz, Diana Villarreal, Jeffrey D Klausner
{"title":"IgM tests for detecting <i>Treponema pallidum</i> infection in newborns: time to establish a reference comparator.","authors":"Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz, Diana Villarreal, Jeffrey D Klausner","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00551-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00551-24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0055124"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323539/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141579835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-14Epub Date: 2024-07-25DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00728-23
Hannah Wang
The laboratory diagnosis of antiviral resistance is a quickly changing field due to new drug availability, the sunsetting of older drugs, the development of novel technologies, rapid viral evolution, and the financial/logistic pressures of the clinical laboratory. This mini-review summarizes the current state of clinically available antiviral resistance testing in the United States in 2024, covering the most commonly used test methods, mechanisms, and clinical indications for herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, influenza, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus drug resistance testing. Common themes include the move away from phenotypic to genotypic methods for first-line clinical testing, as well as uncertainty surrounding the clinical meaningfulness of minority variant detection as next-generation sequencing methods have become more commonplace.
{"title":"Practical updates in clinical antiviral resistance testing.","authors":"Hannah Wang","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00728-23","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00728-23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The laboratory diagnosis of antiviral resistance is a quickly changing field due to new drug availability, the sunsetting of older drugs, the development of novel technologies, rapid viral evolution, and the financial/logistic pressures of the clinical laboratory. This mini-review summarizes the current state of clinically available antiviral resistance testing in the United States in 2024, covering the most commonly used test methods, mechanisms, and clinical indications for herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, influenza, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus drug resistance testing. Common themes include the move away from phenotypic to genotypic methods for first-line clinical testing, as well as uncertainty surrounding the clinical meaningfulness of minority variant detection as next-generation sequencing methods have become more commonplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0072823"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323466/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141759063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay is based on a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay to quantify lipoarabinomannan (LAM) in sputum within 1 h, and was developed as an alternative to conventional culture methods for monitoring tuberculosis (TB) treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance and initial clinical feasibility of using five Mycobacterium tuberculosis variants, 178 non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), 34 upper respiratory and oral cavity microorganisms, 100 sputum specimens from untreated patients, and potential interfering substances, including 27 drugs. The results reveled a single-site repeatability coefficient of variation (CV) of 5.2%-7.0%, and a multi-site reproducibility CV of 7.1%-8.4%. The limit of blank, limit of detection, and limit of quantification were 3.03 pg/mL, 6.67 pg/mL, and 7.44 pg/mL, respectively. Linearity was observed over the analytical measurement range (10.0 pg/mL-50,000 pg/mL), and no hook effect was observed. The assay tended to cross-react with slow-growing NTMs, but not with common upper respiratory and oral cavity microorganisms, except Nocardia asteroides, Nocardia farcinica, and Tsukamurella paurometabola. No interference was observed in the presence of mucin, blood, or major anti-TB, anti-HIV, and anti-pneumonia drugs. Regarding clinical performance, the assay had a sensitivity of 88.8% (95% CI: 80.0%-94.0%) and specificity of 100.0% (95% CI: 83.9%-100.0%) using mycobacterial culture as the reference standard, and a correlation (Spearman's r = -0.770) was observed between LAM concentration and time to detection of culture. These findings show, for the first time, that the PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay has potential value for monitoring TB treatment.
{"title":"Development and preliminary evaluation toward a new tuberculosis treatment monitoring tool: the PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay.","authors":"Ayumi Akinaga, Masahito Takahashi, Takahito Yamazaki, Kinuyo Chikamatsu, Shuhei Matsushita, Yuichiro Hashimoto, Takako Iyoda, Takeshi Saika, Satoshi Mitarai","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00629-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00629-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay is based on a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay to quantify lipoarabinomannan (LAM) in sputum within 1 h, and was developed as an alternative to conventional culture methods for monitoring tuberculosis (TB) treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance and initial clinical feasibility of using five <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> variants, 178 non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), 34 upper respiratory and oral cavity microorganisms, 100 sputum specimens from untreated patients, and potential interfering substances, including 27 drugs. The results reveled a single-site repeatability coefficient of variation (CV) of 5.2%-7.0%, and a multi-site reproducibility CV of 7.1%-8.4%. The limit of blank, limit of detection, and limit of quantification were 3.03 pg/mL, 6.67 pg/mL, and 7.44 pg/mL, respectively. Linearity was observed over the analytical measurement range (10.0 pg/mL-50,000 pg/mL), and no hook effect was observed. The assay tended to cross-react with slow-growing NTMs, but not with common upper respiratory and oral cavity microorganisms, except <i>Nocardia asteroides</i>, <i>Nocardia farcinica</i>, and <i>Tsukamurella paurometabola</i>. No interference was observed in the presence of mucin, blood, or major anti-TB, anti-HIV, and anti-pneumonia drugs. Regarding clinical performance, the assay had a sensitivity of 88.8% (95% CI: 80.0%-94.0%) and specificity of 100.0% (95% CI: 83.9%-100.0%) using mycobacterial culture as the reference standard, and a correlation (Spearman's <i>r</i> = -0.770) was observed between LAM concentration and time to detection of culture. These findings show, for the first time, that the PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay has potential value for monitoring TB treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0062924"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141723721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-14Epub Date: 2024-07-15DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00476-24
Anthea Cheng, Anindita Das, Claire E Styles, Zin Naing, William D Rawlinson, Iain B Gosbell
Using sequential immunoassays for the screening of blood donors is well described for viral serology testing but not for the screening of syphilis. In this study, we report the evaluation results and 2-year sequential testing data using two highly sensitive automated serology assays, the Alinity s Syphilis chemiluminescent immunoassay for screening, with all repeatedly reactive samples then tested on the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. We screened 1,767,782 blood donor samples between 7 July 2021 and 6 July 2023 and found the Alinity false-positive rate to be low at 0.08% (1,456/1,767,782). The common false-positive rate between the two assays was also low (3.83%, 58/1,514). Concordantly reactive samples were further tested using a Treponema pallidum particle agglutination test, a rapid plasma reagin test, and a fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test. There were 262/1,376 concordantly reactive Alinity and Elecsys blood donor samples with reactivity on one or more of the confirmatory tests. A total of 26/1,376 donors had a current syphilis infection, 152/1,376 reported a past history of syphilis and had been treated, and 84/1,376 did not report a past history of syphilis. We suggest that future studies could explore the use of sequential immunoassays to aid in the serodiagnosis for syphilis.
Importance: The serodiagnosis for syphilis usually follows two methodologies-a "traditional" algorithm using a non-treponemal test followed by confirmation using a treponemal test, or a "reverse" algorithm using a treponemal test followed by a non-treponemal test. There are limited reports in the literature of using a modified reverse algorithm (treponemal test followed by a second treponemal test), and to the best of knowledge, there are currently no published articles using two highly sensitive automated immunoassays to aid the serodiagnosis of syphilis. In addition, the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) assay is commonly used as a confirmatory test for the diagnosis of syphilis. With the withdrawal of the TPPA assay from Australia and presumably from the global market also, alternative testing algorithms are now required. This study provides proof of concept for using sequential immunoassays in the diagnosis of syphilis.
{"title":"Improved efficiency using sequential automated immunoassays for syphilis screening in blood donors.","authors":"Anthea Cheng, Anindita Das, Claire E Styles, Zin Naing, William D Rawlinson, Iain B Gosbell","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00476-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00476-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using sequential immunoassays for the screening of blood donors is well described for viral serology testing but not for the screening of syphilis. In this study, we report the evaluation results and 2-year sequential testing data using two highly sensitive automated serology assays, the Alinity s Syphilis chemiluminescent immunoassay for screening, with all repeatedly reactive samples then tested on the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. We screened 1,767,782 blood donor samples between 7 July 2021 and 6 July 2023 and found the Alinity false-positive rate to be low at 0.08% (1,456/1,767,782). The common false-positive rate between the two assays was also low (3.83%, 58/1,514). Concordantly reactive samples were further tested using a <i>Treponema pallidum</i> particle agglutination test, a rapid plasma reagin test, and a fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test. There were 262/1,376 concordantly reactive Alinity and Elecsys blood donor samples with reactivity on one or more of the confirmatory tests. A total of 26/1,376 donors had a current syphilis infection, 152/1,376 reported a past history of syphilis and had been treated, and 84/1,376 did not report a past history of syphilis. We suggest that future studies could explore the use of sequential immunoassays to aid in the serodiagnosis for syphilis.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>The serodiagnosis for syphilis usually follows two methodologies-a \"traditional\" algorithm using a non-treponemal test followed by confirmation using a treponemal test, or a \"reverse\" algorithm using a treponemal test followed by a non-treponemal test. There are limited reports in the literature of using a modified reverse algorithm (treponemal test followed by a second treponemal test), and to the best of knowledge, there are currently no published articles using two highly sensitive automated immunoassays to aid the serodiagnosis of syphilis. In addition, the <i>Treponema pallidum</i> particle agglutination (TPPA) assay is commonly used as a confirmatory test for the diagnosis of syphilis. With the withdrawal of the TPPA assay from Australia and presumably from the global market also, alternative testing algorithms are now required. This study provides proof of concept for using sequential immunoassays in the diagnosis of syphilis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0047624"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323462/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141616578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-14Epub Date: 2024-07-24DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00267-24
Laura Mannonen, Pia Jokela, Marianne Kragh Thomsen, Sabine Yerly, Gustavo Cilla, Daniel Jarem, Jesse A Canchola, Mark Hopkins
Guidelines recommend monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and BK virus (BKV) in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. The majority of quantitative DNA testing for EBV and BKV employs unstandardized individual laboratory-developed testing solutions (LDTs), with implications for accuracy, reproducibility, and comparability between laboratories. The performance of the cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays was assessed across five laboratories, using the World Health Organization International Standards (WHO IS) for EBV and BKV, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Quantitative Standard for BKV, and results were compared with the LDTs in use at the time. Methods were also compared using locally sourced clinical specimens. Variation was high when laboratories reported EBV or BKV DNA values using LDTs, where quantitative values were observed to differ by up to 1.5 log10 unit/mL between sites. Conversely, results from the cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays were accurate and reproducible across sites and on different testing days. Adjustment of LDTs using the international standards led to closer alignment between the assays; however, day-to-day reproducibility of LDTs remained high. In addition, BKV continued to show bias, indicating challenges with the commutability of the BKV International Standard. The cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays are automated, aligned to the WHO IS, and have the potential to reduce the variability in viral load testing introduced by differences in LDTs. Standardization of reporting values may eventually allow different centers to compare data to allow clinical decision thresholds to be established supporting improvements in patient management.IMPORTANCEThe application of center-specific cut-offs for clinical decisions and the variability of LDTs often hinder interpretation; thus, the findings reported here support the need for standardization in the field of post-transplant monitoring of EBV and BKV to improve patient management. Alongside the choice of assay, it is also important to consider which standard to use when deciding upon a testing methodology. This is a call to action for standardization, as treatment for EBV and BKV is driven by viral load test results, and the more accurate and comparable the test results are across institutions, the more informed and better the treatment decisions can be.
{"title":"Performance of the cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays: multi-site comparison of standardized quantitation.","authors":"Laura Mannonen, Pia Jokela, Marianne Kragh Thomsen, Sabine Yerly, Gustavo Cilla, Daniel Jarem, Jesse A Canchola, Mark Hopkins","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00267-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00267-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guidelines recommend monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and BK virus (BKV) in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. The majority of quantitative DNA testing for EBV and BKV employs unstandardized individual laboratory-developed testing solutions (LDTs), with implications for accuracy, reproducibility, and comparability between laboratories. The performance of the cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays was assessed across five laboratories, using the World Health Organization International Standards (WHO IS) for EBV and BKV, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Quantitative Standard for BKV, and results were compared with the LDTs in use at the time. Methods were also compared using locally sourced clinical specimens. Variation was high when laboratories reported EBV or BKV DNA values using LDTs, where quantitative values were observed to differ by up to 1.5 log<sub>10</sub> unit/mL between sites. Conversely, results from the cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays were accurate and reproducible across sites and on different testing days. Adjustment of LDTs using the international standards led to closer alignment between the assays; however, day-to-day reproducibility of LDTs remained high. In addition, BKV continued to show bias, indicating challenges with the commutability of the BKV International Standard. The cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays are automated, aligned to the WHO IS, and have the potential to reduce the variability in viral load testing introduced by differences in LDTs. Standardization of reporting values may eventually allow different centers to compare data to allow clinical decision thresholds to be established supporting improvements in patient management.IMPORTANCEThe application of center-specific cut-offs for clinical decisions and the variability of LDTs often hinder interpretation; thus, the findings reported here support the need for standardization in the field of post-transplant monitoring of EBV and BKV to improve patient management. Alongside the choice of assay, it is also important to consider which standard to use when deciding upon a testing methodology. This is a call to action for standardization, as treatment for EBV and BKV is driven by viral load test results, and the more accurate and comparable the test results are across institutions, the more informed and better the treatment decisions can be.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0026724"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323559/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141751861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-14Epub Date: 2024-07-26DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00229-24
Shaheed Vally Omar, Gail Louw, Farzana Ismail, Xiaohong Liu, Dumsani Ngcamu, Thabisile Gwala, Minty van der Meulen, Lavania Joseph
Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) poses a significant public health concern in South Africa due to its complexity in diagnosis, treatment, and management. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/XDR test for detecting drug resistance in patients with TB by using archived sputum sediments. This study analyzed 322 samples collected from patients diagnosed with TB between 2016 and 2019 across South Africa, previously characterized by phenotypic and genotypic methods. The Xpert MTB/XDR test was evaluated for its ability to detect resistance to isoniazid (INH), ethionamide (ETH), fluoroquinolones (FLQ), and second-line injectable drugs (SLIDs) compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Culture, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, and Xpert MTB/RIF (G4) tests were performed to determine sensitivity and agreement with this test for TB detection. The sensitivities using a composite reference standard, pDST, and sequencing were >90% for INH, FLQ, amikacin (AMK), kanamycin (KAN), and capreomycin (CAP) resistance, meeting the WHO target product profile criteria for this class. A lower sensitivity of 65.9% (95% CI: 57.1-73.6) for ETH resistance was observed. The Xpert MTB/XDR showed a sensitivity of 98.3% (95% CI: 96.1-99.3) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 86.7-100) compared with culture, a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 98.8% (95% CI: 93.7-99.8) and negative percent agreement (NPA) of 100.0% (95% CI: 78.5-100.0) compared with G4, and a PPA of 99.5% (95% CI: 97.3-99.9) and NPA of 100.0% (95% CI: 78.5-100.0) compared with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The test offers a promising solution for the rapid detection of drug-resistant TB and could significantly enhance control efforts in this setting.
{"title":"Performance evaluation of the Xpert MTB/XDR test for the detection of drug resistance to <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> among people diagnosed with tuberculosis in South Africa.","authors":"Shaheed Vally Omar, Gail Louw, Farzana Ismail, Xiaohong Liu, Dumsani Ngcamu, Thabisile Gwala, Minty van der Meulen, Lavania Joseph","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00229-24","DOIUrl":"10.1128/jcm.00229-24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) poses a significant public health concern in South Africa due to its complexity in diagnosis, treatment, and management. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/XDR test for detecting drug resistance in patients with TB by using archived sputum sediments. This study analyzed 322 samples collected from patients diagnosed with TB between 2016 and 2019 across South Africa, previously characterized by phenotypic and genotypic methods. The Xpert MTB/XDR test was evaluated for its ability to detect resistance to isoniazid (INH), ethionamide (ETH), fluoroquinolones (FLQ), and second-line injectable drugs (SLIDs) compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Culture, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, and Xpert MTB/RIF (G4) tests were performed to determine sensitivity and agreement with this test for TB detection. The sensitivities using a composite reference standard, pDST, and sequencing were >90% for INH, FLQ, amikacin (AMK), kanamycin (KAN), and capreomycin (CAP) resistance, meeting the WHO target product profile criteria for this class. A lower sensitivity of 65.9% (95% CI: 57.1-73.6) for ETH resistance was observed. The Xpert MTB/XDR showed a sensitivity of 98.3% (95% CI: 96.1-99.3) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 86.7-100) compared with culture, a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 98.8% (95% CI: 93.7-99.8) and negative percent agreement (NPA) of 100.0% (95% CI: 78.5-100.0) compared with G4, and a PPA of 99.5% (95% CI: 97.3-99.9) and NPA of 100.0% (95% CI: 78.5-100.0) compared with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for detecting <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>. The test offers a promising solution for the rapid detection of drug-resistant TB and could significantly enhance control efforts in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0022924"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323472/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141759062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}