Pub Date : 2025-08-13DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001088
Kelsee M Stromberg, Erin D Bouldin, Dawne Vogt, Shannon R Miles, Angela P Presson, Megan E Vanneman, Thomas N Maloney, Mary Jo Pugh
Objective: To assess the impact of probable deployment traumatic brain injury (TBI) history on post-9/11 US veterans' participation in productive activities-including employment, caregiving, volunteering, and education-after military service.
Methods: This secondary cross-sectional analysis of the Veterans Metrics Initiative (TVMI) study examined productive activities among 8946 veterans who transitioned from service in 2016 and completed the TVMI survey. Associations between probable deployment TBI and activity engagement were analyzed using bivariate analysis and multinomial logistic regression. Probable deployment TBI, the independent variable, was defined as a head injury with loss or alteration of consciousness. The dependent variable was engagement in productive activities, categorized as neither paid nor unpaid labor (reference), paid labor only, paid and unpaid labor, and unpaid labor only. Covariates included demographic characteristics, self-reported premilitary TBI, and a positive screen for probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) identified using the PC-PTSD-5 screening tool.
Results: Veterans with probable deployment TBI were significantly less likely to engage in paid labor only (risk ratio [RR] = 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.79, P < .001) or paid and unpaid labor (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, P = .023) compared to those without TBI. Conversely, they were more likely to engage in unpaid labor only (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.48, P = .024). These associations remained after adjusting for covariates described above.
Conclusions: Productive activity engagement differed between veterans with and without probable deployment TBI. Veterans with probable deployment TBI were less likely to participate in paid labor and more likely to engage in unpaid or no labor. Additional support may be needed to facilitate their transition into the civilian workforce.
目的:评估可能的部署创伤性脑损伤(TBI)历史对9/11后美国退伍军人在服兵役后参与生产性活动(包括就业、照顾、志愿服务和教育)的影响。方法:对退伍军人指标倡议(TVMI)研究进行二次横断面分析,对2016年完成TVMI调查的8946名退伍军人的生产活动进行调查。使用双变量分析和多项逻辑回归分析了可能部署TBI和活动参与之间的关联。自变量TBI被定义为伴有意识丧失或改变的头部损伤。因变量是参与生产活动,分为无酬无酬劳动(参考)、仅有酬劳动、有酬无酬劳动和仅无酬劳动。协变量包括人口统计学特征,自我报告的军事前创伤性脑损伤,以及使用PC-PTSD-5筛查工具确定的可能的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的阳性筛查。结果:与未发生TBI的退伍军人相比,可能发生部署性TBI的退伍军人仅从事有偿劳动(风险比[RR] = 0.66, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.55-0.79, P < .001)或有偿和无偿劳动(RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, P = 0.023)的可能性显著降低。相反,他们更有可能只从事无偿劳动(RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.48, P = 0.024)。在对上述协变量进行调整后,这些关联仍然存在。结论:有和没有可能部署性脑损伤的退伍军人的生产性活动参与程度不同。患有可能部署性脑损伤的退伍军人较少参与有偿劳动,而更有可能从事无偿劳动或不从事劳动。可能需要额外的支助,以促进他们过渡到文职人员队伍。
{"title":"Impact of Probable Deployment Traumatic Brain Injury on Post-9/11 Veteran's Productive Activity Participation After Service: A TVMI Study.","authors":"Kelsee M Stromberg, Erin D Bouldin, Dawne Vogt, Shannon R Miles, Angela P Presson, Megan E Vanneman, Thomas N Maloney, Mary Jo Pugh","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001088","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of probable deployment traumatic brain injury (TBI) history on post-9/11 US veterans' participation in productive activities-including employment, caregiving, volunteering, and education-after military service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary cross-sectional analysis of the Veterans Metrics Initiative (TVMI) study examined productive activities among 8946 veterans who transitioned from service in 2016 and completed the TVMI survey. Associations between probable deployment TBI and activity engagement were analyzed using bivariate analysis and multinomial logistic regression. Probable deployment TBI, the independent variable, was defined as a head injury with loss or alteration of consciousness. The dependent variable was engagement in productive activities, categorized as neither paid nor unpaid labor (reference), paid labor only, paid and unpaid labor, and unpaid labor only. Covariates included demographic characteristics, self-reported premilitary TBI, and a positive screen for probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) identified using the PC-PTSD-5 screening tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Veterans with probable deployment TBI were significantly less likely to engage in paid labor only (risk ratio [RR] = 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.79, P < .001) or paid and unpaid labor (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, P = .023) compared to those without TBI. Conversely, they were more likely to engage in unpaid labor only (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.48, P = .024). These associations remained after adjusting for covariates described above.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Productive activity engagement differed between veterans with and without probable deployment TBI. Veterans with probable deployment TBI were less likely to participate in paid labor and more likely to engage in unpaid or no labor. Additional support may be needed to facilitate their transition into the civilian workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12890051/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144847103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-08DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001094
Caroline A Sablone, Michelle M Pebole, Emily J Van Etten, Adam Lebas, Alexandra C Kenna, Dylan Katz, Colleen B Hursh, Alyssa Currao, Jennifer R Fonda, Catherine B Fortier
Objective: To explore if the STEP-Home (SH) group workshop improves neurobehavioral symptoms, civilian readjustment, anger control, and frontal system function in post-9/11 Veterans with and without a TBI. This is a secondary analysis from a 2-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Participants: One hundred and ninety-five male and female post-9/11 Veterans participated in a multisite RCT of SH versus Present Centered Group Therapy; a subset of 66 who received the SH intervention and completed all assessments were selected for this analysis. Participants were grouped based on TBI diagnosis. Almost half had a history of TBI (TBI+ n = 28; 42.4%; mean age 38.6 ± 9.1 years) whereas 38 had no history of TBI (TBI- mean age 41.0 ± 12.2 years).
Setting: VA Healthcare System and telehealth.
Intervention: SH was a 12-week, 90 minute/week, transdiagnostic, skills-based group intervention focused on problem solving, emotion regulation, and anger control skill building.
Main measures: Outcomes were neurobehavioral symptoms, anger control, reintegration status, and frontal system function. Data were collected at pre-treatment (T1), post-treatment (T2), and at 12-week post-treatment follow-up (T3).
Results: Both groups (TBI+ and TBI-) showed significant improvements in neurobehavioral symptoms, reintegration status, and aspects of frontal system function. Anger control was only improved in the TBI+ group. Treatment benefits were maintained over time.
Conclusions: The STEP-Home intervention shows promise for improving persistent neurobehavioral symptoms in Veterans with and without a history of TBI. Treatment benefits were maintained over time in both groups. Veterans with a history of TBI showed significant improvement in anger control, which is critical to improving daily functional status after brain injury. SH offers an acceptable, transdiagnostic alternative treatment approach to improve functioning for Veterans with TBI and those at risk for TBI/brain injury due to military service.
目的:探讨STEP-Home (SH)小组研讨会是否能改善有或无创伤性脑损伤的9/11后退伍军人的神经行为症状、平民再适应、愤怒控制和额叶系统功能。这是一项来自两组随机对照试验(RCT)的二次分析。参与者:195名9/11后退伍军人参加了一项多地点随机对照试验,比较了SH与以现在为中心的团体治疗;接受SH干预并完成所有评估的66名患者被选中进行分析。参与者根据TBI诊断进行分组。近半数患者有TBI病史(TBI+ n = 28;42.4%;平均年龄38.6±9.1岁),38例无TBI病史(平均年龄41.0±12.2岁)。设置:VA医疗保健系统和远程医疗。干预:SH是一个为期12周,每周90分钟,跨诊断,以技能为基础的小组干预,重点是解决问题,情绪调节和愤怒控制技能的建立。主要测量指标:神经行为症状、愤怒控制、重返社会状况和额叶系统功能。在治疗前(T1)、治疗后(T2)和治疗后12周随访(T3)收集数据。结果:两组(TBI+和TBI-)在神经行为症状、重返社会状态和额叶系统功能方面均有显著改善。愤怒控制只在TBI+组有所改善。随着时间的推移,治疗效果得以维持。结论:STEP-Home干预有望改善有或没有创伤性脑损伤史的退伍军人的持续性神经行为症状。两组的治疗效果在一段时间内保持不变。有创伤性脑损伤史的退伍军人在愤怒控制方面有显著改善,这对改善脑损伤后的日常功能状态至关重要。SH提供了一种可接受的、跨诊断的替代治疗方法,以改善患有TBI的退伍军人和那些由于服兵役而有TBI/脑损伤风险的人的功能。
{"title":"STEP-Home Improves Neurobehavioral Symptoms and Reintegration in Veterans With TBI and Differentially Impacts Anger Control.","authors":"Caroline A Sablone, Michelle M Pebole, Emily J Van Etten, Adam Lebas, Alexandra C Kenna, Dylan Katz, Colleen B Hursh, Alyssa Currao, Jennifer R Fonda, Catherine B Fortier","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore if the STEP-Home (SH) group workshop improves neurobehavioral symptoms, civilian readjustment, anger control, and frontal system function in post-9/11 Veterans with and without a TBI. This is a secondary analysis from a 2-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred and ninety-five male and female post-9/11 Veterans participated in a multisite RCT of SH versus Present Centered Group Therapy; a subset of 66 who received the SH intervention and completed all assessments were selected for this analysis. Participants were grouped based on TBI diagnosis. Almost half had a history of TBI (TBI+ n = 28; 42.4%; mean age 38.6 ± 9.1 years) whereas 38 had no history of TBI (TBI- mean age 41.0 ± 12.2 years).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>VA Healthcare System and telehealth.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>SH was a 12-week, 90 minute/week, transdiagnostic, skills-based group intervention focused on problem solving, emotion regulation, and anger control skill building.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Outcomes were neurobehavioral symptoms, anger control, reintegration status, and frontal system function. Data were collected at pre-treatment (T1), post-treatment (T2), and at 12-week post-treatment follow-up (T3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups (TBI+ and TBI-) showed significant improvements in neurobehavioral symptoms, reintegration status, and aspects of frontal system function. Anger control was only improved in the TBI+ group. Treatment benefits were maintained over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The STEP-Home intervention shows promise for improving persistent neurobehavioral symptoms in Veterans with and without a history of TBI. Treatment benefits were maintained over time in both groups. Veterans with a history of TBI showed significant improvement in anger control, which is critical to improving daily functional status after brain injury. SH offers an acceptable, transdiagnostic alternative treatment approach to improve functioning for Veterans with TBI and those at risk for TBI/brain injury due to military service.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144847106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001095
Francesca V Lopez, Ruiyan Hu, Tanvi Krishnan, Kristine C Dell, William C Walker, Victoria C Merritt, Amy Jak
Objective: To examine the relationship between injury context with psychiatric and cognitive outcomes among combat-exposed Veterans and Service Members with remote mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).
Setting: Veterans and Service Members enrolled in the Long-Term Impact of Military-Relevant Injury Consortium (LIMBIC)-Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (CENC).
Participants: LIMBIC-CENC-enrolled participants who had sustained an mTBI exclusively in combat zones (c-mTBI +; n = 314), mTBI sustained exclusively in non-combat settings (c-mTBI-; n = 526), or no history of mTBI (no TBI; n = 347). Inclusion criteria for this study included (1) availability of all mTBI injury-related characteristics, (2) completion of all psychiatric symptom measures, and (3) completion of all neuropsychological measures used for this study.
Design: Cross-sectional secondary analysis.
Main measures: Primary outcomes of interest included total scores on self-reported psychiatric symptom measures (post-traumatic stress, neurobehavioral, and cognitive concerns) and objective cognitive composite test scores (attention, learning, processing speed, executive function, and delayed recall). All analyses adjusted for age, gender, and education.
Results: Results of separate multivariate analyses of variance indicated that the c-mTBI+ group reported higher post-traumatic (ηP2 = .08) and neurobehavioral symptoms (ηP2 = .07), and cognitive concerns (ηP2 = .04) compared to the c-mTBI- and no TBI groups, whereas the c-mTBI- and no TBI groups did not differ except on cognitive concerns. Additionally, groups did not differ across cognitive composite performance except for significant though weak group differences on learning (ηP2 = .01), delayed recall (ηP2 = .03), and processing speed (ηP2 = .01). Separate hierarchical regression analyses indicated psychiatric symptom burden explained 7-18% of the total variance in cognitive composite performance as a function of mTBI group history (ps ≤ .002).
Conclusions: These findings build upon prior work showing that injury context - the context in which mTBI occurs - may play an important role in long-term psychiatric and cognitive outcomes.
{"title":"Context Matters: Influence of Injury Context on Long-Term Psychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes in Combat Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury History.","authors":"Francesca V Lopez, Ruiyan Hu, Tanvi Krishnan, Kristine C Dell, William C Walker, Victoria C Merritt, Amy Jak","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between injury context with psychiatric and cognitive outcomes among combat-exposed Veterans and Service Members with remote mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Veterans and Service Members enrolled in the Long-Term Impact of Military-Relevant Injury Consortium (LIMBIC)-Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (CENC).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>LIMBIC-CENC-enrolled participants who had sustained an mTBI exclusively in combat zones (c-mTBI +; n = 314), mTBI sustained exclusively in non-combat settings (c-mTBI-; n = 526), or no history of mTBI (no TBI; n = 347). Inclusion criteria for this study included (1) availability of all mTBI injury-related characteristics, (2) completion of all psychiatric symptom measures, and (3) completion of all neuropsychological measures used for this study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional secondary analysis.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Primary outcomes of interest included total scores on self-reported psychiatric symptom measures (post-traumatic stress, neurobehavioral, and cognitive concerns) and objective cognitive composite test scores (attention, learning, processing speed, executive function, and delayed recall). All analyses adjusted for age, gender, and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of separate multivariate analyses of variance indicated that the c-mTBI+ group reported higher post-traumatic (ηP2 = .08) and neurobehavioral symptoms (ηP2 = .07), and cognitive concerns (ηP2 = .04) compared to the c-mTBI- and no TBI groups, whereas the c-mTBI- and no TBI groups did not differ except on cognitive concerns. Additionally, groups did not differ across cognitive composite performance except for significant though weak group differences on learning (ηP2 = .01), delayed recall (ηP2 = .03), and processing speed (ηP2 = .01). Separate hierarchical regression analyses indicated psychiatric symptom burden explained 7-18% of the total variance in cognitive composite performance as a function of mTBI group history (ps ≤ .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings build upon prior work showing that injury context - the context in which mTBI occurs - may play an important role in long-term psychiatric and cognitive outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144847101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-04DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001093
Sara Gallow, Jennifer McGinley, John Olver, Dean McKenzie, Gavin Williams
Objective: To determine the incidence of exercise-induced symptom exacerbation and adverse events from cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and high-level mobility (HLM) exertional testing in the early subacute phase (≤3 months post-injury) following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Setting: Inpatient TBI subacute rehabilitation unit.
Participants: One hundred fifty adults and adolescents ≥15 years with moderate-to-severe TBI completed a total of 205 exertional tests (83 participants completed CRF only, 12 HLM only, and 55 both CRF and HLM).
Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Consecutive admissions were screened for recruitment between August 2017 and August 2021. Symptom ratings were recorded pre- and post-CRF and HLM exertional testing on the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool symptom scale. A summed symptom severity score (SCAT-SS) was calculated with a ≥10-point increase classified as symptom exacerbation and a ≥10-point reduction classified as symptom improvement.
Main measures: SCAT symptom scale.
Results: One participant experienced a ≥10-point increase in SCAT-SS (ie, symptom exacerbation) post-CRF testing (1/138 = 0.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01%-4.0%) and 1 post-HLM testing (1/67 = 1.5%, 95% CI = 0.04%-8.0%). Sixteen of 138 (11.6%, 95% CI = 6.8%-18.1%) CRF tests resulted in a ≥10-point decrease in SCAT-SS (ie, symptom improvement). Nine of 67 (13.4%, 95% CI = 6.3%-24.0%) HLM tests resulted in a ≥10-point decrease in SCAT-SS. Participants were more likely to experience symptom improvement than symptom exacerbation for both CRF and HLM exertion (P ≤ .05). One adverse event, a fall, occurred during an HLM testing session.
Conclusions: CRF and HLM exertional testing in the early subacute phase of recovery following moderate-to-severe TBI appears to be safe, with low rates of symptom exacerbation and adverse events identified.
目的:了解中重度颅脑损伤(TBI)患者早期亚急性期(伤后≤3个月)心肺适能(CRF)和高水平运动能力(HLM)运动诱发症状加重和不良事件的发生率。环境:住院TBI亚急性康复病房。参与者:150名≥15岁的中重度TBI成人和青少年共完成了205项体力测试(83名参与者仅完成了CRF, 12名参与者仅完成了HLM, 55名参与者同时完成了CRF和HLM)。设计:前瞻性观察队列研究。2017年8月至2021年8月期间的连续招生进行了筛选。在运动脑震荡评估工具症状量表上记录crf前后和HLM运动测试后的症状评分。计算症状严重程度评分(SCAT-SS),增加≥10分为症状加重,减少≥10分为症状改善。主要测量方法:SCAT症状量表。结果:1名受试者在crf测试后SCAT-SS(即症状加重)升高≥10点(1/138 = 0.7%,95%可信区间[CI] = 0.01%-4.0%), 1名受试者在hlm测试后SCAT-SS升高(1/67 = 1.5%,95% CI = 0.04%-8.0%)。138例CRF试验中有16例(11.6%,95% CI = 6.8%-18.1%) SCAT-SS降低≥10点(即症状改善)。67例HLM试验中有9例(13.4%,95% CI = 6.3%-24.0%)导致SCAT-SS下降≥10点。在CRF和HLM运动中,参与者更有可能经历症状改善而不是症状加重(P≤0.05)。一个不良事件,跌倒,发生在HLM测试期间。结论:在中重度脑外伤后恢复的早期亚急性期进行CRF和HLM测试似乎是安全的,症状恶化率和不良事件发生率均较低。
{"title":"Exercise-Induced Symptom Exacerbation and Adverse Events in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Sara Gallow, Jennifer McGinley, John Olver, Dean McKenzie, Gavin Williams","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the incidence of exercise-induced symptom exacerbation and adverse events from cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and high-level mobility (HLM) exertional testing in the early subacute phase (≤3 months post-injury) following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Inpatient TBI subacute rehabilitation unit.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred fifty adults and adolescents ≥15 years with moderate-to-severe TBI completed a total of 205 exertional tests (83 participants completed CRF only, 12 HLM only, and 55 both CRF and HLM).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational cohort study. Consecutive admissions were screened for recruitment between August 2017 and August 2021. Symptom ratings were recorded pre- and post-CRF and HLM exertional testing on the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool symptom scale. A summed symptom severity score (SCAT-SS) was calculated with a ≥10-point increase classified as symptom exacerbation and a ≥10-point reduction classified as symptom improvement.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>SCAT symptom scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One participant experienced a ≥10-point increase in SCAT-SS (ie, symptom exacerbation) post-CRF testing (1/138 = 0.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01%-4.0%) and 1 post-HLM testing (1/67 = 1.5%, 95% CI = 0.04%-8.0%). Sixteen of 138 (11.6%, 95% CI = 6.8%-18.1%) CRF tests resulted in a ≥10-point decrease in SCAT-SS (ie, symptom improvement). Nine of 67 (13.4%, 95% CI = 6.3%-24.0%) HLM tests resulted in a ≥10-point decrease in SCAT-SS. Participants were more likely to experience symptom improvement than symptom exacerbation for both CRF and HLM exertion (P ≤ .05). One adverse event, a fall, occurred during an HLM testing session.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRF and HLM exertional testing in the early subacute phase of recovery following moderate-to-severe TBI appears to be safe, with low rates of symptom exacerbation and adverse events identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144847102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-30DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001087
Shanti M Pinto, Bhaskar Thakur, Raj G Kumar, Umesh M Venkatesan, Amelia J Hicks, Simon Driver, Kan Ding, Thomas K Watanabe, Kathleen Bell, William C Walker, Sheryl Katta-Charles, Ross Zafonte, Amanda Rabinowitz, Flora M Hammond
Objective: To characterize factors associated with death due to cardiovascular causes following complicated mild to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Setting: Chart review or telephonic interviews.
Participants: Participants enrolled in the TBI Model Systems database.
Design: Retrospective.
Main measures: Primary cause of death due to cardiovascular causes coded with ICD-9 codes 390-459 or ICD-10 codes 100-199 (diseases of the circulatory system) on death certificates. A competing risk cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was completed to identify demographic and injury-related factors associated with increased risk of cardiovascular-related mortality.
Results: Overall, 15,370 participants were included. Overall, 2,770 (18.0%) individuals died, of which 595 (21.5%) died due to cardiovascular-related causes. Those who died due to cardiovascular causes were older (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08, 95% 1.07-1.09, P <.001), more likely to be male (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.50-2.26, P <.001), divorced (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.20-2.23, P = .002), and had lower functional independence measure motor scores (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99, P <.001). Individuals who identified as Asian/Pacific Islander (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.55, P = .002), were employed (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.90, P = .010), had private insurance (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99, P = .043), and had post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) duration >30 days (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.92, P = .010) were less likely to die due to cardiovascular causes. Alcohol or drug use and education level were not significantly associated with death due to cardiovascular causes.
Conclusion: Over 1 in 5 deaths following TBI were due to cardiovascular causes. Older age, male sex, being divorced, and having lower FIM motor scores are risk factors, whereas being employed, having private health insurance, and PTA >30 days are protective factors for cardiovascular mortality.
目的:探讨复杂性轻至重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后心血管原因死亡的相关因素。设置:图表回顾或电话访谈。参与者:在TBI模型系统数据库中注册的参与者。设计:回顾性。主要措施:主要死亡原因为心血管疾病,死亡证明上的ICD-9代码390-459或ICD-10代码100-199(循环系统疾病)。完成了竞争风险原因特异性Cox比例风险回归分析,以确定与心血管相关死亡风险增加相关的人口统计学和损伤相关因素。结果:共纳入15370名参与者。总体而言,2770人(18.0%)死亡,其中595人(21.5%)死于心血管相关原因。因心血管原因死亡的患者年龄较大(风险比[HR] 1.08, 95% 1.07-1.09, P = 30天(HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.92, P = 0.010),因心血管原因死亡的可能性较小。酒精或药物使用和教育水平与心血管原因导致的死亡没有显著相关。结论:超过1 / 5的TBI死亡是由于心血管原因。年龄较大、男性、离婚和FIM运动评分较低是危险因素,而就业、拥有私人医疗保险和PTA少于30天是心血管死亡率的保护因素。
{"title":"Factors Associated With Cardiovascular Mortality After Complicated Mild to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): A TBI Model Systems Study.","authors":"Shanti M Pinto, Bhaskar Thakur, Raj G Kumar, Umesh M Venkatesan, Amelia J Hicks, Simon Driver, Kan Ding, Thomas K Watanabe, Kathleen Bell, William C Walker, Sheryl Katta-Charles, Ross Zafonte, Amanda Rabinowitz, Flora M Hammond","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize factors associated with death due to cardiovascular causes following complicated mild to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Chart review or telephonic interviews.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants enrolled in the TBI Model Systems database.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Primary cause of death due to cardiovascular causes coded with ICD-9 codes 390-459 or ICD-10 codes 100-199 (diseases of the circulatory system) on death certificates. A competing risk cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was completed to identify demographic and injury-related factors associated with increased risk of cardiovascular-related mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 15,370 participants were included. Overall, 2,770 (18.0%) individuals died, of which 595 (21.5%) died due to cardiovascular-related causes. Those who died due to cardiovascular causes were older (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08, 95% 1.07-1.09, P <.001), more likely to be male (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.50-2.26, P <.001), divorced (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.20-2.23, P = .002), and had lower functional independence measure motor scores (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99, P <.001). Individuals who identified as Asian/Pacific Islander (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.55, P = .002), were employed (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.90, P = .010), had private insurance (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99, P = .043), and had post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) duration >30 days (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.92, P = .010) were less likely to die due to cardiovascular causes. Alcohol or drug use and education level were not significantly associated with death due to cardiovascular causes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over 1 in 5 deaths following TBI were due to cardiovascular causes. Older age, male sex, being divorced, and having lower FIM motor scores are risk factors, whereas being employed, having private health insurance, and PTA >30 days are protective factors for cardiovascular mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144742260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-29DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001080
Amelia J Hicks, Nicola L de Souza, Jill Del Pozzo, Noelle K Kurth, Jean P Hall, Kristen Dams-O'Connor
Objective: To identify the prevalence of incident traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness (traumatic brain injury [TBI] with loss of consciousness [LOC]) among a cohort of individuals with preexisting disabilities. To examine age at first TBI with LOC and number of TBI with LOC. To identify whether TBI with LOC was associated with type of preexisting primary disability and age of disability onset. We also compared psychosocial function between those with and without TBI with LOC.
Setting: 2023/2024 National Survey on Health and Disability (NSHD).
Participants: Adults aged ≥18 years, living in the US, with self-reported preexisting disabilities. Our analyses included 235 participants who reported TBI with LOC after the onset of their primary disability, and 1211 participants who did not experience TBI with LOC.
Main measures: NSHD survey and abbreviated Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire.
Results: A total of 235 individuals sustained TBI after disability onset. The average age of first TBI with LOC was 20.3 years, and 34.1% of participants incurred multiple TBIs with LOC. In fully adjusted models, relative to a primary physical/mobility disability, having a primary mental illness/psychiatric disability was associated with higher odds of incident TBI with LOC. Younger age at disability onset was associated with a 5% greater odds of reporting incident TBI with LOC. Finally, those with TBI with LOC were more likely to report poor physical and mental health days, and greater levels of loneliness, but did not have higher odds of unemployment compared to those without TBI.
Conclusion: TBI with LOC in those living with preexisting disability is common, associated with younger age at disability onset, greater likelihood of poor physical and mental health days, and greater loneliness. Screening for TBI in those living with all-cause disability is warranted, alongside care coordination to meet care needs of this vulnerable but historically overlooked group.
目的:了解外伤性脑损伤伴意识丧失(traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness,简称TBI伴意识丧失)在残障人群中的发生率。目的:探讨首次脑损伤合并LOC的年龄及LOC的数量。确定脑外伤合并LOC是否与先前存在的原发性残疾类型和残疾发病年龄有关。我们还比较了有和没有TBI的LOC患者的社会心理功能。背景:2023/2024年全国健康和残疾调查(NSHD)。参与者:年龄≥18岁,居住在美国,自我报告已有残疾的成年人。我们的分析包括235名在原发性残疾发生后报告有LOC的TBI参与者,以及1211名没有LOC的TBI参与者。设计:横断面观察性在线调查。主要措施:NSHD调查和简短的脑损伤筛查问卷。结果:共有235人在残疾发作后持续发生TBI。首次脑损伤合并LOC的平均年龄为20.3岁,34.1%的参与者发生多次脑损伤合并LOC。在完全调整的模型中,相对于原发性身体/行动障碍,患有原发性精神疾病/精神障碍与LOC发生TBI的几率较高相关。残疾发病年龄越小,报告发生TBI合并LOC的几率越高5%。最后,那些有LOC的TBI患者更有可能报告身体和心理健康状况不佳,孤独感更强,但与没有TBI的人相比,失业的几率并不高。结论:脑外伤合并LOC在先前存在残疾的患者中很常见,与残疾发病年龄较年轻、身体和心理健康状况不佳的可能性更大以及孤独感更强有关。在患有全因残疾的患者中进行TBI筛查是必要的,同时进行护理协调,以满足这一弱势但历来被忽视的群体的护理需求。
{"title":"Traumatic Brain Injury in Those With Preexisting Disability: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Psychosocial Function.","authors":"Amelia J Hicks, Nicola L de Souza, Jill Del Pozzo, Noelle K Kurth, Jean P Hall, Kristen Dams-O'Connor","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001080","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the prevalence of incident traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness (traumatic brain injury [TBI] with loss of consciousness [LOC]) among a cohort of individuals with preexisting disabilities. To examine age at first TBI with LOC and number of TBI with LOC. To identify whether TBI with LOC was associated with type of preexisting primary disability and age of disability onset. We also compared psychosocial function between those with and without TBI with LOC.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>2023/2024 National Survey on Health and Disability (NSHD).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults aged ≥18 years, living in the US, with self-reported preexisting disabilities. Our analyses included 235 participants who reported TBI with LOC after the onset of their primary disability, and 1211 participants who did not experience TBI with LOC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational online survey.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>NSHD survey and abbreviated Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 235 individuals sustained TBI after disability onset. The average age of first TBI with LOC was 20.3 years, and 34.1% of participants incurred multiple TBIs with LOC. In fully adjusted models, relative to a primary physical/mobility disability, having a primary mental illness/psychiatric disability was associated with higher odds of incident TBI with LOC. Younger age at disability onset was associated with a 5% greater odds of reporting incident TBI with LOC. Finally, those with TBI with LOC were more likely to report poor physical and mental health days, and greater levels of loneliness, but did not have higher odds of unemployment compared to those without TBI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TBI with LOC in those living with preexisting disability is common, associated with younger age at disability onset, greater likelihood of poor physical and mental health days, and greater loneliness. Screening for TBI in those living with all-cause disability is warranted, alongside care coordination to meet care needs of this vulnerable but historically overlooked group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144707732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-22DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001086
Christian Mirian, Therese Ovesen, Lasse Rehné Jensen, Thomas Scheike, Jacob Bertram Springborg
Objective: Our aim was to explore the length of stay (LOS) as a predictor of long-term mortality in patients surviving a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objectives were to (1) establish TBI length of stay (LOS)-based groups empirically, (2) assess their accuracy in predicting death, and (3) compare the long-term risk of death between the LOS-based groups and non-TBI controls (Controls).
Participants: Patients (≥18.0) with TBIs in Denmark between 1994 and 2018 that survived beyond discharge were (1:5) age-matched with Controls.
Design: Nationwide cohort study. TBI patients and Controls were stratified according to age: 18.0-39.9, 40.0-69.9, and ≥70.0.
Main measures: Adjusted binomial regression was used to estimate odd ratios for mortality, and predictive accuracy was assessed using cross-validated area under the receiver operation curve (AUC) values. The Kaplan-Meier method and the adjusted binomial regression models were used to compare the all-cause mortality between LOS-based groups and Controls.
Results: Among 153 177 TBI survivors, LOS-based groupings showed modest stratification of mortality risk, particularly in those under 70.0 years. However, based on the AUC, they did not improve individual-level prediction of death once adjusted for key confounders. Compared with Controls, TBI survivors had persistently excess mortality risk of up to 20 years post-index across all age groups. In older adults, LOS was positively correlated with the number of new comorbidities detected during hospitalization, which likely contributed to the observation that TBI patients with short LOS had better survival than Controls in this age population (surveillance bias).
Conclusions: LOS-based groups did not predict individual-level risk of death in TBI survivors but offered some short-term risk stratification at a group-level. Its application to group-level mortality outcomes in older adults is complicated by surveillance bias. Persistent excess mortality across all age groups supports the need for long-term follow-up after TBI.
{"title":"Length of Stay as a Predictor of Long-Term Mortality in Patients Surviving a Traumatic Brain Injury: A Nationwide TBI Cohort Study of 153 177 Adults.","authors":"Christian Mirian, Therese Ovesen, Lasse Rehné Jensen, Thomas Scheike, Jacob Bertram Springborg","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001086","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim was to explore the length of stay (LOS) as a predictor of long-term mortality in patients surviving a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objectives were to (1) establish TBI length of stay (LOS)-based groups empirically, (2) assess their accuracy in predicting death, and (3) compare the long-term risk of death between the LOS-based groups and non-TBI controls (Controls).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients (≥18.0) with TBIs in Denmark between 1994 and 2018 that survived beyond discharge were (1:5) age-matched with Controls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nationwide cohort study. TBI patients and Controls were stratified according to age: 18.0-39.9, 40.0-69.9, and ≥70.0.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Adjusted binomial regression was used to estimate odd ratios for mortality, and predictive accuracy was assessed using cross-validated area under the receiver operation curve (AUC) values. The Kaplan-Meier method and the adjusted binomial regression models were used to compare the all-cause mortality between LOS-based groups and Controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 153 177 TBI survivors, LOS-based groupings showed modest stratification of mortality risk, particularly in those under 70.0 years. However, based on the AUC, they did not improve individual-level prediction of death once adjusted for key confounders. Compared with Controls, TBI survivors had persistently excess mortality risk of up to 20 years post-index across all age groups. In older adults, LOS was positively correlated with the number of new comorbidities detected during hospitalization, which likely contributed to the observation that TBI patients with short LOS had better survival than Controls in this age population (surveillance bias).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LOS-based groups did not predict individual-level risk of death in TBI survivors but offered some short-term risk stratification at a group-level. Its application to group-level mortality outcomes in older adults is complicated by surveillance bias. Persistent excess mortality across all age groups supports the need for long-term follow-up after TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144707731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-22DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001078
Jessica Bruijel, Sven Stapert, Annemiek Vermeeren, Julie Staals, Jennie Ponsford, Caroline van Heugten
Objective: To examine the development of different dimensions of fatigue and subjective and objective measures of sleep in the first 18 months post moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), and explore the association with biological (processing speed), psychological (mood), and social (restrictions in participation) factors across time.
Participants: Forty-two participants with moderate-severe TBI (45 ± 16 years old, 33% female).
Design: Longitudinal multicenter observational cohort study with 4 measurements (3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-injury).
Main measures: Dimensions of fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale, FSS; Dutch Multifactor Fatigue Scale, DMFS), subjective (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) and objective sleep (actigraphy), processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Task, SDMT), mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), and restrictions in participation (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation and Rehabilitation-Participation, USER-P).
Results: Results showed reduced sleep quality (PSQI: poor sleep quality at 3 months 41%; 6 months 43%; 12 months 56%; 18 months 43%) and high levels of fatigue (FSS: severe fatigue at 3 months 41%; 6 months 38%; 12 months 33%; 18 months 34%) with no significant changes over time. Physical fatigue (DMFS: β = -0.11, P = .007) and total sleep time (β = -0.14, P = .015) decreased over time. More mood problems were associated with worse sleep quality (PSQI; β = 0.35, P = .021), shorter total sleep time (β = 0.14, P = .046), and higher levels of fatigue (FSS: β = 0.20, P = .036; DMFS-mental: β = 0.36, P = .028; DMFS-physical: β = 0.36, P = .029). Restrictions in participation were associated with fatigue but not with sleep.
Conclusions: High and stable levels of fatigue and poor sleep quality in the first 18 months following moderate-severe TBI were found. These symptoms were associated with mood problems. Assessment and treatment of fatigue and sleep problems should be included in clinical practice. In line with other studies, we suggest that mood interventions might aid the treatment for fatigue and sleep quality.
目的:探讨中重度颅脑损伤(TBI)后18个月内不同维度疲劳和主客观睡眠指标的发展,并探讨其与生理(加工速度)、心理(情绪)和社会(参与限制)因素的关系。参与者:42例中重度TBI患者(45±16岁,33%为女性)。设计:纵向多中心观察队列研究,包括4项测量(损伤后3、6、12和18个月)。主要测量方法:疲劳量表(疲劳严重性量表,FSS);荷兰多因素疲劳量表,DMFS),主观(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数,PSQI)和客观睡眠(活动描记),处理速度(符号数字模式任务,SDMT),情绪(医院焦虑和抑郁量表,HADS),以及参与限制(乌得勒支评估和康复参与量表,USER-P)。结果:结果显示:睡眠质量下降(PSQI): 3个月时睡眠质量差41%;6个月43%;12个月56%;18个月43%)和高度疲劳(FSS: 3个月严重疲劳41%;6个月38%;12个月33%;18个月(34%),随着时间的推移没有明显的变化。身体疲劳(DMFS: β = -0.11, P = .007)和总睡眠时间(β = -0.14, P = .015)随着时间的推移而减少。更多的情绪问题与更差的睡眠质量(PSQI;β = 0.35, P = 0.021),总睡眠时间较短(β = 0.14, P = 0.046),疲劳程度较高(FSS: β = 0.20, P = 0.036;DMFS-mental: β = 0.36, P = 0.028;dmfs -物理:β = 0.36, P = 0.029)。限制参与与疲劳有关,但与睡眠无关。结论:在中重度脑外伤后的前18个月,患者存在高度且稳定的疲劳和较差的睡眠质量。这些症状与情绪问题有关。疲劳和睡眠问题的评估和治疗应纳入临床实践。与其他研究一致,我们认为情绪干预可能有助于治疗疲劳和睡眠质量。
{"title":"Course of Fatigue and Sleep After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Jessica Bruijel, Sven Stapert, Annemiek Vermeeren, Julie Staals, Jennie Ponsford, Caroline van Heugten","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the development of different dimensions of fatigue and subjective and objective measures of sleep in the first 18 months post moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), and explore the association with biological (processing speed), psychological (mood), and social (restrictions in participation) factors across time.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-two participants with moderate-severe TBI (45 ± 16 years old, 33% female).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal multicenter observational cohort study with 4 measurements (3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-injury).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Dimensions of fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale, FSS; Dutch Multifactor Fatigue Scale, DMFS), subjective (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) and objective sleep (actigraphy), processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Task, SDMT), mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), and restrictions in participation (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation and Rehabilitation-Participation, USER-P).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed reduced sleep quality (PSQI: poor sleep quality at 3 months 41%; 6 months 43%; 12 months 56%; 18 months 43%) and high levels of fatigue (FSS: severe fatigue at 3 months 41%; 6 months 38%; 12 months 33%; 18 months 34%) with no significant changes over time. Physical fatigue (DMFS: β = -0.11, P = .007) and total sleep time (β = -0.14, P = .015) decreased over time. More mood problems were associated with worse sleep quality (PSQI; β = 0.35, P = .021), shorter total sleep time (β = 0.14, P = .046), and higher levels of fatigue (FSS: β = 0.20, P = .036; DMFS-mental: β = 0.36, P = .028; DMFS-physical: β = 0.36, P = .029). Restrictions in participation were associated with fatigue but not with sleep.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High and stable levels of fatigue and poor sleep quality in the first 18 months following moderate-severe TBI were found. These symptoms were associated with mood problems. Assessment and treatment of fatigue and sleep problems should be included in clinical practice. In line with other studies, we suggest that mood interventions might aid the treatment for fatigue and sleep quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144707729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This study aims to validate an instrumented dual-task (DT) assessment procedure based on smartphone-embedded sensors. Data processing algorithms were developed to extract relevant features, and ice hockey players were evaluated.
Participants: In total, 114 Swiss elite ice hockey players.
Design: Experimental study.
Main measures: Participants performed DT tests regularly during the season and within the days following a diagnosed concussion. The DT test consisted of static balance and self-paced walking, combined with counting backward by 3. In total, 265 DT tests were performed, including 38 tests between 1 day and 2 weeks after the 13 diagnosed concussions.
Results: Cognitive abilities during gait were mainly affected after a concussion. A DT performance metric was defined based on features significantly associated with worsening DT performance after the concussion (P < .001, effect size d = 1.50). Finally, a model was proposed to estimate the risk of concussion based on a DT test outcome.
Conclusion: DT assessments can detect residual cognitive impairments even after other clinical symptoms have resolved. These tests offer medical staff objective insights, facilitating informed decision-making during the return-to-play process.
{"title":"Instrumented Dual-Task Tests Help for Concussion Assessment in Ice Hockey.","authors":"Frederic Meyer, Nicolas Baehler, Dario Sciacca, Lea Chabrowski, Mathieu Falbriard, Anisoara Ionescu","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to validate an instrumented dual-task (DT) assessment procedure based on smartphone-embedded sensors. Data processing algorithms were developed to extract relevant features, and ice hockey players were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>In total, 114 Swiss elite ice hockey players.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Experimental study.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Participants performed DT tests regularly during the season and within the days following a diagnosed concussion. The DT test consisted of static balance and self-paced walking, combined with counting backward by 3. In total, 265 DT tests were performed, including 38 tests between 1 day and 2 weeks after the 13 diagnosed concussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cognitive abilities during gait were mainly affected after a concussion. A DT performance metric was defined based on features significantly associated with worsening DT performance after the concussion (P < .001, effect size d = 1.50). Finally, a model was proposed to estimate the risk of concussion based on a DT test outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DT assessments can detect residual cognitive impairments even after other clinical symptoms have resolved. These tests offer medical staff objective insights, facilitating informed decision-making during the return-to-play process.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144659316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-08DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001075
Gabrielle A Hromas, Marlina A Novoa, Jeremy J Davis
Objective: To determine whether there is a relationship between objective cognitive performance and self-reported cognitive status after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and whether mental health symptoms influence this relationship.
Participants and design: Secondary analysis of the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research Informatics System database included an initial sample of 2657 participants. Cases with missing data, questionable validity, age over 65, or mild-complicated, moderate, or severe TBI were excluded resulting in a final sample of 614 individuals (n = 138 controls and n = 476 mTBI).
Main measures: Z-scores were derived using the Brief Test of Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) cognitive screener and the composite of the cognitive complaint items (CC) on the Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire to represent objective and subjective cognitive status, respectively. The cognitive discrepancy was calculated by regressing BTACT on CC scores and retaining standardized residuals which produced a different score. A linear regression model was fitted using continuous cognitive discrepancy scores as the outcome and age, gender, time since injury, education, and mental health status (obtained via several self-report questionnaires) as predictors.
Results: Individuals with mTBI had higher affective symptoms and cognitive complaints but did not differ from controls based on objective cognitive abilities. Affective symptoms were significantly higher in individuals with mTBI who reported higher subjective complaints than expected based on cognitive scores. Older age, female gender, and increased emotional distress were associated with greater cognitive discrepancy in the whole sample.
Conclusions: Consistent with prior research, elevated psychological symptoms burden was associated with higher subjective cognitive complaints in relation to objective cognitive abilities. These results highlight the continued need for psychological intervention in post-mTBI recovery.
{"title":"Objective Versus Subjective Cognitive Status Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Psychological Factors.","authors":"Gabrielle A Hromas, Marlina A Novoa, Jeremy J Davis","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether there is a relationship between objective cognitive performance and self-reported cognitive status after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and whether mental health symptoms influence this relationship.</p><p><strong>Participants and design: </strong>Secondary analysis of the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research Informatics System database included an initial sample of 2657 participants. Cases with missing data, questionable validity, age over 65, or mild-complicated, moderate, or severe TBI were excluded resulting in a final sample of 614 individuals (n = 138 controls and n = 476 mTBI).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Z-scores were derived using the Brief Test of Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) cognitive screener and the composite of the cognitive complaint items (CC) on the Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire to represent objective and subjective cognitive status, respectively. The cognitive discrepancy was calculated by regressing BTACT on CC scores and retaining standardized residuals which produced a different score. A linear regression model was fitted using continuous cognitive discrepancy scores as the outcome and age, gender, time since injury, education, and mental health status (obtained via several self-report questionnaires) as predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with mTBI had higher affective symptoms and cognitive complaints but did not differ from controls based on objective cognitive abilities. Affective symptoms were significantly higher in individuals with mTBI who reported higher subjective complaints than expected based on cognitive scores. Older age, female gender, and increased emotional distress were associated with greater cognitive discrepancy in the whole sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with prior research, elevated psychological symptoms burden was associated with higher subjective cognitive complaints in relation to objective cognitive abilities. These results highlight the continued need for psychological intervention in post-mTBI recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144659317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}