首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation最新文献

英文 中文
Examination of the Association Between History of Self-Reported Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurocognitive Performance. 自述轻度创伤性脑损伤史与神经认知表现之间关系的研究。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-11 DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001109
Wenjing Meng, Florin Vaida, Nicola L de Souza, Emily L Dennis, Elisabeth A Wilde, Joanna Jacobus, Xia Yang, Michael Cheng, Emily A Troyer, Everett L Delfel, Tracy Abildskov, John R Hesselink, Erin D Bigler, Jeffrey E Max

Objective: To examine whether pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is associated with differences in neurocognitive functioning among children.

Setting: Baseline data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.

Participants: Children with mTBI were compared to two control groups: children with orthopedic injury (OI) and children with no injury (NI). After excluding those with moderate/severe TBI, 450 children were classified as having mTBI, 1604 with OI, and 9814 with NI.

Design: This is a cross-sectional analysis using the baseline data from a longitudinal observational study. Neurocognitive performance was assessed using task-based cognitive tests, including the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTBX), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and the Little Man Task. Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. Linear regression models were used to compare cognitive performance across groups, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, parental income, parental education, and genetic ancestry.

Main measures: The primary outcomes include the principal component scores representing General Ability, Executive Function, and Learning/Memory.

Results: Unadjusted analyses showed children with mTBI had significantly higher scores than NI children on all three principal components. However, no significant differences remained after adjusting for confounders. No differences were found between mTBI and OI groups. Sensitivity analyses further adjusting for behavior and white matter microstructure resulted in same findings.

Conclusion: After adjusting for demographic and genetic factors, no significant differences were found between children with mTBI and OI/NI. The findings highlight the importance of accounting for demographic, socioeconomic, and genetic confounders, as well as selecting appropriate control groups, when analyzing cognitive differences of children with mTBI.

目的:探讨小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)是否与儿童神经认知功能差异有关。背景:青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究的基线数据。参与者:将mTBI患儿与两个对照组进行比较:骨科损伤患儿(OI)和无损伤患儿(NI)。在排除中度/重度TBI后,450名儿童被分类为mTBI, 1604名为OI, 9814名为NI。设计:这是一个使用纵向观察研究基线数据的横断面分析。使用基于任务的认知测试评估神经认知表现,包括美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池(NIHTBX)、雷伊听觉语言学习测试和小人任务。采用多重插值解决缺失数据。使用线性回归模型比较各组的认知表现,调整年龄、性别、种族、民族、父母收入、父母教育程度和遗传血统。主要测量:主要结果包括代表一般能力、执行功能和学习/记忆的主成分得分。结果:未经调整的分析显示,mTBI儿童在所有三个主要成分上的得分明显高于NI儿童。然而,在调整混杂因素后,没有显著差异。在mTBI组和OI组之间没有发现差异。敏感性分析进一步调整了行为和白质微观结构,得出了相同的结果。结论:在调整人口统计学和遗传因素后,mTBI患儿与OI/NI患儿之间无显著差异。研究结果强调了在分析mTBI儿童的认知差异时,考虑人口统计学、社会经济和遗传混杂因素以及选择适当的对照组的重要性。
{"title":"Examination of the Association Between History of Self-Reported Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurocognitive Performance.","authors":"Wenjing Meng, Florin Vaida, Nicola L de Souza, Emily L Dennis, Elisabeth A Wilde, Joanna Jacobus, Xia Yang, Michael Cheng, Emily A Troyer, Everett L Delfel, Tracy Abildskov, John R Hesselink, Erin D Bigler, Jeffrey E Max","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is associated with differences in neurocognitive functioning among children.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Baseline data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children with mTBI were compared to two control groups: children with orthopedic injury (OI) and children with no injury (NI). After excluding those with moderate/severe TBI, 450 children were classified as having mTBI, 1604 with OI, and 9814 with NI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a cross-sectional analysis using the baseline data from a longitudinal observational study. Neurocognitive performance was assessed using task-based cognitive tests, including the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTBX), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and the Little Man Task. Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. Linear regression models were used to compare cognitive performance across groups, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, parental income, parental education, and genetic ancestry.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcomes include the principal component scores representing General Ability, Executive Function, and Learning/Memory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unadjusted analyses showed children with mTBI had significantly higher scores than NI children on all three principal components. However, no significant differences remained after adjusting for confounders. No differences were found between mTBI and OI groups. Sensitivity analyses further adjusting for behavior and white matter microstructure resulted in same findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After adjusting for demographic and genetic factors, no significant differences were found between children with mTBI and OI/NI. The findings highlight the importance of accounting for demographic, socioeconomic, and genetic confounders, as well as selecting appropriate control groups, when analyzing cognitive differences of children with mTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145075475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
False-Positive Rates and Associated Factors on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) Using the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE 2) Cutoffs in U.S. Military Personnel. 美国军事人员使用军事急性脑震荡评估2 (MACE 2)截止点进行前庭/眼运动筛查(VOMS)的假阳性率及相关因素
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001108
Karen H Lambert, Carrie W Hoppes, Aaron J Zynda, Anne Mucha, Katrina Monti, Michael W Collins, Shawn R Eagle, Anthony P Kontos

Objective: This study examined false-positive rates and associated factors on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) in healthy US Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) personnel using the symptom provocation cutoff of ≥1 for any VOMS item as recommended in the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE 2).

Setting: Military site.

Participants: Active-duty USASOC personnel aged 18 to 40 years with 20/20 vision, no duty limitations, and no recent concussion. Participants were excluded if they had a history of vestibular or neurologic disorder, only monocular vision capabilities, or previous moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Four hundred and sixteen USASOC personnel were enrolled; 402 were analyzed.

Design: This was a cross-sectional study of diagnostic accuracy. Trained research personnel administered the VOMS. Participants and research personnel were not blinded.

Main measures: False-positive rates and associated risk factors on the VOMS.

Results: Among 402 healthy participants (mean age 28.5 ± 5.7 years), 35.1% had at least one false positive on the VOMS. Twenty-two percent had at least one false-positive change score, 12.2% had a near-point convergence (NPC) distance ≥5 cm, and 4.2% had both. VOMS false positives on each VOMS item ranged from 4.7% to 15.7%. Participants with ≥1 false positive on the VOMS were more likely to have a motion sickness history (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.35-4.12, P = .003) or a concussion history (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.27-3.05, P = .002).

Conclusion: The MACE 2 cutoff resulted in a higher overall rate of at least one false positive across items (35.1%) in this sample of healthy USASOC personnel compared to prior total score cutoffs. Consistent with previous research, a history of motion sickness or concussion was associated with an increased likelihood of false positives. Multivariate predictors included motion sickness and a history of concussion. Military medical providers should consider motion sickness, history of concussion, and performance on individual VOMS items.

目的:本研究采用军事急性脑震荡评估2 (MACE 2)中建议的前庭/眼运动筛查(VOMS)任一项目的症状激发临界值≥1,检查美国陆军特种作战司令部(USASOC)健康人员前庭/眼运动筛查(VOMS)的假阳性率及其相关因素。背景:军事基地。参与者:美国奥委会现役人员,年龄18 - 40岁,视力20/20,无任务限制,近期无脑震荡。如果参与者有前庭或神经障碍病史,只有单眼视力,或以前有中度至重度创伤性脑损伤,则排除在外。416名美国奥委会人员被录取;402例进行分析。设计:这是一项诊断准确性的横断面研究。训练有素的研究人员管理VOMS。参与者和研究人员没有被蒙蔽。主要指标:VOMS的假阳性率及相关危险因素。结果:402名健康参与者(平均年龄28.5±5.7岁)中,有35.1%的人在VOMS上至少出现一次假阳性。22%的患者至少有一个假阳性变化评分,12.2%的患者近点收敛(NPC)距离≥5 cm, 4.2%的患者两者都有。VOMS各项目的假阳性值在4.7% ~ 15.7%之间。VOMS假阳性≥1的受试者更有可能有晕动病史(OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.35-4.12, P = 0.003)或脑震荡史(OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.27-3.05, P = 0.002)。结论:与之前的总分截止值相比,MACE 2截止值导致USASOC健康人员样本中至少一个假阳性的总体比率(35.1%)更高。与之前的研究一致,晕动病或脑震荡的病史与假阳性的可能性增加有关。多变量预测因素包括晕车和脑震荡史。军事医疗服务提供者应考虑晕动病、脑震荡史和个人VOMS项目的表现。
{"title":"False-Positive Rates and Associated Factors on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) Using the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE 2) Cutoffs in U.S. Military Personnel.","authors":"Karen H Lambert, Carrie W Hoppes, Aaron J Zynda, Anne Mucha, Katrina Monti, Michael W Collins, Shawn R Eagle, Anthony P Kontos","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined false-positive rates and associated factors on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) in healthy US Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) personnel using the symptom provocation cutoff of ≥1 for any VOMS item as recommended in the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE 2).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Military site.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Active-duty USASOC personnel aged 18 to 40 years with 20/20 vision, no duty limitations, and no recent concussion. Participants were excluded if they had a history of vestibular or neurologic disorder, only monocular vision capabilities, or previous moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Four hundred and sixteen USASOC personnel were enrolled; 402 were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of diagnostic accuracy. Trained research personnel administered the VOMS. Participants and research personnel were not blinded.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>False-positive rates and associated risk factors on the VOMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 402 healthy participants (mean age 28.5 ± 5.7 years), 35.1% had at least one false positive on the VOMS. Twenty-two percent had at least one false-positive change score, 12.2% had a near-point convergence (NPC) distance ≥5 cm, and 4.2% had both. VOMS false positives on each VOMS item ranged from 4.7% to 15.7%. Participants with ≥1 false positive on the VOMS were more likely to have a motion sickness history (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.35-4.12, P = .003) or a concussion history (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.27-3.05, P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MACE 2 cutoff resulted in a higher overall rate of at least one false positive across items (35.1%) in this sample of healthy USASOC personnel compared to prior total score cutoffs. Consistent with previous research, a history of motion sickness or concussion was associated with an increased likelihood of false positives. Multivariate predictors included motion sickness and a history of concussion. Military medical providers should consider motion sickness, history of concussion, and performance on individual VOMS items.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145000774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and Evaluation of Sleep Disorder Decision Aids for Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. 轻度创伤性脑损伤退伍军人睡眠障碍决策辅助工具的开发与评价。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001097
Adam R Kinney, Lisa A Brenner, Morgan Nance, Audrey D Cobb, Jeri E Forster, Christi S Ulmer, Risa Nakase-Richardson, Constance H Fung, Nazanin H Bahraini

Objective: First, to summarize the design of novel decision aid prototypes aimed at facilitating shared decision-making for Veterans with co-morbid mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and sleep disorders (insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea [OSA]) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Polytrauma/TBI System of Care (PSC). Second, to elicit feedback regarding usability, acceptability, and feasibility of prototypes to inform future implementation.

Setting: Nationwide VHA PSC sites.

Participants: Clinicians included VHA providers involved in the management of mTBI and/or sleep disorders in the VHA PSC (n = 7). Veterans included those with a clinician-confirmed mTBI who received care for insomnia disorder and OSA within the past year (n = 5).

Design: Convergent parallel mixed methods.

Main measures: Semi-structured interview guides; System Usability Scale; Ottawa Decision Aid Acceptability Scale.

Results: Participants found the decision aid prototypes easy to use, highlighting its accessibility and features enabling an easy comparison of treatments. However, participants recommended changes to simplify and improve the design. Decision aids were seen as acceptable, providing essential information for Veterans with mTBI and facilitating shared decision-making among providers, Veterans, and other decision partners (eg, spouse). Removal of non-essential content was recommended to increase acceptability. Decision aids were considered feasible to implement, though extending the decision-making process beyond the initial encounter and accounting for time constraints were recommended.

Conclusions: Findings highlight that the decision aids are easy-to-use, feasible to implement, and capable of improving Veteran-centered management of sleep disorders among those with mTBI. Nonetheless, clinicians and Veterans offered recommendations for changes that can improve the utility of the decision aids and facilitate their seamless integration into routine care for Veterans with co-morbid mTBI and sleep disorders. Findings lay the foundation for efforts aimed at implementing the decision aids into routine care for sleep disorders in the VHA PSC, aligning care decisions with Veteran preferences and improving outcomes.

目的:首先,总结旨在促进退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)多重创伤/TBI护理系统(PSC)中伴有轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)和睡眠障碍(失眠、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停[OSA])的退伍军人共同决策的新型决策辅助原型设计。第二,引出关于原型的可用性、可接受性和可行性的反馈,以告知未来的实现。设置:全国VHA PSC站点。参与者:临床医生包括在VHA PSC中参与mTBI和/或睡眠障碍管理的VHA提供者(n = 7)。退伍军人包括那些在过去一年内接受失眠障碍和睡眠呼吸暂停治疗的临床证实的mTBI患者(n = 5)。设计:收敛并行混合方法。主要措施:半结构化面试指南;系统可用性量表;渥太华决策援助可接受性量表。结果:参与者发现决策辅助原型易于使用,突出了其可访问性和功能,使治疗容易比较。然而,参与者建议进行更改以简化和改进设计。决策辅助被认为是可以接受的,为患有mTBI的退伍军人提供必要的信息,并促进提供者、退伍军人和其他决策伙伴(如配偶)之间的共同决策。建议删除不必要的内容以提高可接受性。决策辅助工具被认为是可行的,但建议将决策过程扩展到最初的遭遇之后,并考虑到时间限制。结论:研究结果表明,决策辅助工具易于使用,实施可行,能够改善以退伍军人为中心的mTBI患者睡眠障碍管理。尽管如此,临床医生和退伍军人提出了改进建议,以提高决策辅助工具的效用,并促进其无缝整合到患有mTBI和睡眠障碍的退伍军人的日常护理中。研究结果为在VHA PSC的睡眠障碍常规护理中实施决策辅助奠定了基础,使护理决策与退伍军人的偏好保持一致,并改善结果。
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of Sleep Disorder Decision Aids for Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Adam R Kinney, Lisa A Brenner, Morgan Nance, Audrey D Cobb, Jeri E Forster, Christi S Ulmer, Risa Nakase-Richardson, Constance H Fung, Nazanin H Bahraini","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001097","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>First, to summarize the design of novel decision aid prototypes aimed at facilitating shared decision-making for Veterans with co-morbid mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and sleep disorders (insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea [OSA]) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Polytrauma/TBI System of Care (PSC). Second, to elicit feedback regarding usability, acceptability, and feasibility of prototypes to inform future implementation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nationwide VHA PSC sites.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Clinicians included VHA providers involved in the management of mTBI and/or sleep disorders in the VHA PSC (n = 7). Veterans included those with a clinician-confirmed mTBI who received care for insomnia disorder and OSA within the past year (n = 5).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Convergent parallel mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Semi-structured interview guides; System Usability Scale; Ottawa Decision Aid Acceptability Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants found the decision aid prototypes easy to use, highlighting its accessibility and features enabling an easy comparison of treatments. However, participants recommended changes to simplify and improve the design. Decision aids were seen as acceptable, providing essential information for Veterans with mTBI and facilitating shared decision-making among providers, Veterans, and other decision partners (eg, spouse). Removal of non-essential content was recommended to increase acceptability. Decision aids were considered feasible to implement, though extending the decision-making process beyond the initial encounter and accounting for time constraints were recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight that the decision aids are easy-to-use, feasible to implement, and capable of improving Veteran-centered management of sleep disorders among those with mTBI. Nonetheless, clinicians and Veterans offered recommendations for changes that can improve the utility of the decision aids and facilitate their seamless integration into routine care for Veterans with co-morbid mTBI and sleep disorders. Findings lay the foundation for efforts aimed at implementing the decision aids into routine care for sleep disorders in the VHA PSC, aligning care decisions with Veteran preferences and improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145000725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cross-Lagged Associations Among Sleep, Headache, and Pain in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An A-CAP Study. 儿童轻度外伤性脑损伤中睡眠、头痛和疼痛的交叉滞后关联:一项A-CAP研究。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001038
Safira Dharsee, Ali Hassan, Melanie Noel, Amy M Bender, Miriam H Beauchamp, William Craig, Quynh Doan, Stephen B Freedman, Jocelyn Gravel, Roger Zemek, Keith Owen Yeates

Objective: To test cross-lagged associations among sleep, headache, and pain in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Setting, participants, design: Children and adolescents aged 8.0 to 16.9 years who sustained a mTBI and presented to 1 of 5 pediatric emergency departments across Canada completed assessments at 1-week, 3 months, and 6 months post-injury as part of a larger prospective cohort study.

Main measures: Sleep disturbance was measured using 7 sleep items from the Child Behaviour Checklist. Sleep duration was measured using average weekday and weekend sleep from the Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours Questionnaire. Pain intensity was measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale. Headache severity and associated functional impairment were measured using the Headache Impact Test and 1 item from the Health and Behaviour Inventory. Analyses included trivariate-indicator random-intercept cross-lagged panel models.

Results: Of 633 recruited children, 563 were included in the current study. Headache showed significant within-person, bidirectional, cross-lagged associations with sleep disturbance and duration, as well as with pain intensity. More specifically, worse headache predicted greater sleep disturbance (1-week to 3 months and 3 months to 6 months: B s = .47, P s ≤ .013) and shorter sleep duration (1-week to 3 months: B = -.21, P = .006), while greater sleep disturbance predicted worse headache (1-week to 3 months: B = .08, P = .001). Worse headache also predicted higher pain intensity (1-week to 3 months & 3 months to 6 months: B s ≥ 1.27, P s < .001), while higher pain intensity predicted worse headache (3 months to 6 months: B s ≥ .03, P s ≤ .042). No cross-lagged associations involving sleep disturbance or duration with pain intensity were significant.

Conclusions: Significant bi-directional, cross-lagged associations exist between headache and both sleep and pain. The findings suggest that early intervention for headaches may help prevent later sleep disturbance and pain after pediatric mTBI.

目的:检验儿童轻度外伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者睡眠、头痛和疼痛之间的交叉滞后关系。背景、参与者、设计:在加拿大5个儿科急诊科中的1个接受mTBI治疗的8.0 - 16.9岁儿童和青少年,在损伤后1周、3个月和6个月完成评估,作为一项更大的前瞻性队列研究的一部分。主要测量方法:使用儿童行为检查表中的7个睡眠项目来测量睡眠障碍。睡眠时间是通过健康生活方式行为问卷中的工作日和周末平均睡眠时间来测量的。疼痛强度采用11分的数值评定量表进行测量。使用头痛影响测试和健康与行为量表中的1项来测量头痛严重程度和相关功能损害。分析包括三变量指标随机截距交叉滞后面板模型。结果:在633名被招募的儿童中,563名被纳入本研究。头痛与睡眠障碍、持续时间以及疼痛强度之间存在显著的双向、交叉滞后关联。更具体地说,更严重的头痛预示着更严重的睡眠障碍(1周到3个月和3个月至6个月:Bs = 0.47, Ps≤0.013)和更短的睡眠时间(1周到3个月:B = -)。21, P = 0.006),而更严重的睡眠障碍预示着更严重的头痛(1周至3个月:B = 0.08, P = 0.001)。头痛程度越严重,疼痛强度越高(1周至3个月和3个月至6个月:Bs≥1.27,P < 0.001),而疼痛强度越高,头痛程度越严重(3个月至6个月:Bs≥0.03,P≤0.042)。睡眠障碍或持续时间与疼痛强度之间没有明显的交叉滞后关系。结论:头痛与睡眠和疼痛之间存在显著的双向、交叉滞后关联。研究结果表明,早期干预头痛可能有助于预防儿童mTBI后的睡眠障碍和疼痛。
{"title":"Cross-Lagged Associations Among Sleep, Headache, and Pain in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An A-CAP Study.","authors":"Safira Dharsee, Ali Hassan, Melanie Noel, Amy M Bender, Miriam H Beauchamp, William Craig, Quynh Doan, Stephen B Freedman, Jocelyn Gravel, Roger Zemek, Keith Owen Yeates","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001038","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test cross-lagged associations among sleep, headache, and pain in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).</p><p><strong>Setting, participants, design: </strong>Children and adolescents aged 8.0 to 16.9 years who sustained a mTBI and presented to 1 of 5 pediatric emergency departments across Canada completed assessments at 1-week, 3 months, and 6 months post-injury as part of a larger prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Sleep disturbance was measured using 7 sleep items from the Child Behaviour Checklist. Sleep duration was measured using average weekday and weekend sleep from the Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours Questionnaire. Pain intensity was measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale. Headache severity and associated functional impairment were measured using the Headache Impact Test and 1 item from the Health and Behaviour Inventory. Analyses included trivariate-indicator random-intercept cross-lagged panel models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 633 recruited children, 563 were included in the current study. Headache showed significant within-person, bidirectional, cross-lagged associations with sleep disturbance and duration, as well as with pain intensity. More specifically, worse headache predicted greater sleep disturbance (1-week to 3 months and 3 months to 6 months: B s = .47, P s ≤ .013) and shorter sleep duration (1-week to 3 months: B = -.21, P = .006), while greater sleep disturbance predicted worse headache (1-week to 3 months: B = .08, P = .001). Worse headache also predicted higher pain intensity (1-week to 3 months & 3 months to 6 months: B s ≥ 1.27, P s < .001), while higher pain intensity predicted worse headache (3 months to 6 months: B s ≥ .03, P s ≤ .042). No cross-lagged associations involving sleep disturbance or duration with pain intensity were significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant bi-directional, cross-lagged associations exist between headache and both sleep and pain. The findings suggest that early intervention for headaches may help prevent later sleep disturbance and pain after pediatric mTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"309-318"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143370840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the Relationship Between Chronic Pain and Cognition: A NIDILRR and VA TBI Model Systems Collaborative Project. 评估慢性疼痛与认知之间的关系:NIDILRR和VA TBI模型系统合作项目。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001045
Mackenzie Peckham, Cynthia L Beaulieu, Kaitlin Hays, Marissa Lundstern, Bria MacIntyre, Candice Osborne, Amanda Rabinowitz, Allan L Service, Mitch Sevigny, Katherine Abbasi, William C Walker, Abigail Welch, Candace Tefertiller

Objective: To investigate the associations between current chronic pain and cognition and current chronic head pain and cognition in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Setting: Community.

Participants: A total of 1762 participants from the TBI Model Systems who endorsed experiencing current chronic pain and who completed the Current Chronic Pain survey.

Design: Secondary analysis of a subset of data collected through a multi-site, cross-sectional observational cohort study.

Main outcome measures: Cognition as measured by the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT).

Results: Individuals with TBI who reported current chronic pain exhibited lower cognitive performance compared to those who reported no pain. Among individuals who reported pain, greater pain intensity and pain interference were negatively associated with cognition, resulting in poorer cognitive performance. The negative association was even greater for individuals acknowledging chronic head pain compared to pain from other body locations.

Conclusion: The negative association between current chronic pain and cognition for individuals with TBI indicates the need to consider pain intensity and pain interference as factors possibly influencing cognitive ability.

目的:探讨外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者当前慢性疼痛与认知及当前慢性头痛与认知的关系。设置:社区。参与者:共有1762名来自TBI模型系统的参与者,他们认可正在经历慢性疼痛,并完成了当前慢性疼痛调查。设计:对通过多地点、横断面观察性队列研究收集的数据子集进行二次分析。主要观察指标:认知能力以成人简短电话认知测验(BTACT)测量。结果:报告当前慢性疼痛的TBI个体表现出较低的认知能力,而那些报告没有疼痛的个体。在报告疼痛的个体中,更大的疼痛强度和疼痛干扰与认知呈负相关,导致认知表现较差。与其他身体部位的疼痛相比,承认慢性头部疼痛的人的负面关联更大。结论:TBI患者当前慢性疼痛与认知之间存在负相关关系,提示需要考虑疼痛强度和疼痛干扰可能是影响认知能力的因素。
{"title":"Assessing the Relationship Between Chronic Pain and Cognition: A NIDILRR and VA TBI Model Systems Collaborative Project.","authors":"Mackenzie Peckham, Cynthia L Beaulieu, Kaitlin Hays, Marissa Lundstern, Bria MacIntyre, Candice Osborne, Amanda Rabinowitz, Allan L Service, Mitch Sevigny, Katherine Abbasi, William C Walker, Abigail Welch, Candace Tefertiller","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001045","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the associations between current chronic pain and cognition and current chronic head pain and cognition in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 1762 participants from the TBI Model Systems who endorsed experiencing current chronic pain and who completed the Current Chronic Pain survey.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a subset of data collected through a multi-site, cross-sectional observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Cognition as measured by the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with TBI who reported current chronic pain exhibited lower cognitive performance compared to those who reported no pain. Among individuals who reported pain, greater pain intensity and pain interference were negatively associated with cognition, resulting in poorer cognitive performance. The negative association was even greater for individuals acknowledging chronic head pain compared to pain from other body locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The negative association between current chronic pain and cognition for individuals with TBI indicates the need to consider pain intensity and pain interference as factors possibly influencing cognitive ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"356-367"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353080/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143492403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Veterans Health Administration's Traumatic Brain Injury and Mental Health Screens. 与退伍军人健康管理局创伤性脑损伤和精神健康筛查相关的长期临床结果
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001047
Shannon R Miles, Peter A Toyinbo, Heather G Belanger, Hari H Venkatachalam, Stephen L Luther, Nina A Sayer

Objective: Examine if the mandated Veterans Affairs traumatic brain injury (TBI) screen is associated with long-term postconcussive symptoms as compared to how the mandated mental health (MH) screen is associated with long-term MH symptoms.

Setting: Veterans Health Administration.

Participants: Patients (N = 1628) who were previously screened for TBI with current postconcussive symptoms and MH conditions completed a survey assessing current postconcussive symptoms, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol use, and physical and emotional well-being. Participants were mostly male (83%), less than 40 years old (38%), and identified as White (64%). Forty-five percent screened positive for MH conditions; 11% screened positive for TBI.

Design: Cohort survey study of random sample of post-9/11 veterans combined with retrospective database analysis. Bayesian Network Analysis was used to compare how the TBI and MH screens related to long-term postconcussive and MH symptoms. The pathway on the Bayesian Network graph leading to postconcussive symptoms was thoroughly examined with a regression.

Main measures: Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory to measure postconcussive symptoms.

Results: A Bayesian network arch demonstrated TBI screening was related to use of TBI services within 6 months after the screening but not related to long-term postconcussive or MH symptoms. In comparison, the MH screen led to post-screen MH services, postconcussive symptoms, and most of the other secondary outcomes, including posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. The regression model showed that a positive MH screen, more MH service use, negative life events, and moderate depression were associated with greater postconcussive symptoms years after screening.

Conclusion: While both TBI and MH screening were associated with increased service use, only the MH screen was associated with long-term postconcussive symptoms. Findings raise questions about whether the TBI screening program adds value over and above the MH screening program.

目的:研究强制性退伍军人事务创伤性脑损伤(TBI)筛查是否与长期脑震荡后症状相关,而强制性心理健康(MH)筛查与长期MH症状相关。单位:退伍军人健康管理局。参与者:先前筛查有当前脑震荡后症状和MH状况的TBI患者(N = 1628)完成了一项评估当前脑震荡后症状、抑郁、创伤后应激障碍、酒精使用以及身心健康状况的调查。参与者大多是男性(83%),年龄在40岁以下(38%),被认定为白人(64%)。45%的人被筛查为MH阳性;11%的TBI筛查呈阳性。设计:对911后退伍军人随机抽样进行队列调查研究,并结合回顾性数据库分析。贝叶斯网络分析用于比较TBI和MH筛查与长期脑震荡后和MH症状的关系。贝叶斯网络图上的路径导致脑震荡后症状被彻底检查与回归。主要测量方法:采用神经行为症状量表测量脑震荡后症状。结果:贝叶斯网络研究表明,TBI筛查与筛查后6个月内使用TBI服务有关,但与长期脑震荡后或MH症状无关。相比之下,MH筛查导致筛查后的MH服务、脑震荡后症状和大多数其他次要结局,包括创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症。回归模型显示,阳性的MH筛查、更多的MH服务使用、负面生活事件和中度抑郁与筛查后几年脑震荡后症状加重相关。结论:虽然TBI和MH筛查与服务使用增加有关,但只有MH筛查与长期脑震荡后症状有关。研究结果提出了一个问题,即TBI筛查项目是否比MH筛查项目更有价值。
{"title":"Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Veterans Health Administration's Traumatic Brain Injury and Mental Health Screens.","authors":"Shannon R Miles, Peter A Toyinbo, Heather G Belanger, Hari H Venkatachalam, Stephen L Luther, Nina A Sayer","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001047","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine if the mandated Veterans Affairs traumatic brain injury (TBI) screen is associated with long-term postconcussive symptoms as compared to how the mandated mental health (MH) screen is associated with long-term MH symptoms.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Veterans Health Administration.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients (N = 1628) who were previously screened for TBI with current postconcussive symptoms and MH conditions completed a survey assessing current postconcussive symptoms, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol use, and physical and emotional well-being. Participants were mostly male (83%), less than 40 years old (38%), and identified as White (64%). Forty-five percent screened positive for MH conditions; 11% screened positive for TBI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cohort survey study of random sample of post-9/11 veterans combined with retrospective database analysis. Bayesian Network Analysis was used to compare how the TBI and MH screens related to long-term postconcussive and MH symptoms. The pathway on the Bayesian Network graph leading to postconcussive symptoms was thoroughly examined with a regression.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory to measure postconcussive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A Bayesian network arch demonstrated TBI screening was related to use of TBI services within 6 months after the screening but not related to long-term postconcussive or MH symptoms. In comparison, the MH screen led to post-screen MH services, postconcussive symptoms, and most of the other secondary outcomes, including posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. The regression model showed that a positive MH screen, more MH service use, negative life events, and moderate depression were associated with greater postconcussive symptoms years after screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both TBI and MH screening were associated with increased service use, only the MH screen was associated with long-term postconcussive symptoms. Findings raise questions about whether the TBI screening program adds value over and above the MH screening program.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"E349-E359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143449328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of Clinical TBI Severity and Military Factors With Veteran TBI Service-Connected Disability Ratings and Total Compensation: A Long-Term Impact of Military Brain Injury Consortium (LIMBIC) Study. 临床创伤性脑损伤严重程度和军事因素与退伍军人创伤性脑损伤因公致残评级和总赔偿的关系:军事脑损伤联合会(LIMBIC)长期影响研究》。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001052
Clara E Dismuke-Greer, Aryan Esmaeili, Mary Jo Pugh, Terri K Pogoda, Megan Amuan, David X Cifu

Objective: To understand how traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinical severity and military factors were associated with the likelihood of receiving a TBI service-connected disability (SCD) determination and monthly total SCD compensation among Veterans.

Setting: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA).

Participants: 1 319 590 veterans with a VBA SCD rating who entered the VHA between October 1, 2000, and September 24, 2019.

Design: This retrospective study analyzed the association of TBI severity and military factors with a TBI SCD determination, TBI SCD rating percentage, and monthly total SCD compensation. Administrative VHA and VBA records were utilized.

Main measures: Any TBI SCD determination, TBI SCD rating percentage, and monthly SCD compensation.

Results: 93 911 (7.1%) Veterans had an SCD rating for TBI. TBI SCD increased monthly total compensation by $362 (95% CI 353, 370) in bivariate and $45 (95% CI 38, 52) in adjusted models. Females had lower TBI SCD percentage (-3.03; 95% CI -3.92, -2.14) but higher monthly compensation ($37; 95% CI 33, 42). TBI severity was associated with increasing TBI SCD percentage and monthly SCD compensation. In adjusted models, deployment (-2.36; 95% CI -3.02, -1.69) was associated with lower TBI SCD percentage but not monthly compensation, while combat exposure was not associated with TBI SCD percentage but was associated with higher compensation ($46; 95% CI 40, 53).

Conclusion: TBI severity was significantly associated with TBI SCD determination and TBI SCD rating percentage, in addition to overall SCD compensation. Although deployment was significantly associated with TBI SCD determination, non-deployment was associated with higher TBI SCD percent ratings. These results may be explained by TBI occurring in non-deployment military settings, such as training. This highlights the need to study risk for TBI in the general military environment to ensure that all military-related TBI exposures are recognized and that any related disability is appropriately compensated.

目的:了解创伤性脑损伤(TBI)临床严重程度和军事因素与退伍军人接受TBI服务相关残疾(SCD)鉴定和每月SCD总赔偿的可能性之间的关系。设置:退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)和退伍军人福利管理局(VBA)。参与者:2000年10月1日至2019年9月24日期间进入VHA的1319590名具有VBA SCD评级的退伍军人。设计:本回顾性研究分析了TBI严重程度和军事因素与TBI SCD测定、TBI SCD评定百分比和每月总SCD补偿的关系。利用VHA和VBA管理记录。主要措施:任何TBI SCD测定,TBI SCD评级百分比,每月SCD补偿。结果:93911例(7.1%)退伍军人有创伤性脑损伤的SCD评分。在双变量模型中,TBI SCD使每月总薪酬增加362美元(95% CI 353,370),在调整模型中增加45美元(95% CI 38,52)。女性较低的TBI SCD百分比(-3.03;95% CI -3.92, -2.14),但每月薪酬更高(37美元;95% ci 33,42)。TBI严重程度与TBI SCD百分比和每月SCD补偿增加有关。在调整后的模型中,部署(-2.36;95% CI -3.02, -1.69)与较低的TBI SCD百分比相关,但与每月薪酬无关,而战斗暴露与TBI SCD百分比无关,但与较高的薪酬相关($46;95% ci 40,53)。结论:除了总体SCD补偿外,TBI严重程度与TBI SCD测定和TBI SCD评分百分比显著相关。尽管部署与TBI SCD测定显著相关,但未部署与更高的TBI SCD评分相关。这些结果可以解释为在非部署军事环境中发生的创伤性脑损伤,例如训练。这突出表明有必要研究一般军事环境中创伤性脑损伤的风险,以确保所有与军事有关的创伤性脑损伤暴露得到确认,并确保任何相关的残疾得到适当补偿。
{"title":"Association of Clinical TBI Severity and Military Factors With Veteran TBI Service-Connected Disability Ratings and Total Compensation: A Long-Term Impact of Military Brain Injury Consortium (LIMBIC) Study.","authors":"Clara E Dismuke-Greer, Aryan Esmaeili, Mary Jo Pugh, Terri K Pogoda, Megan Amuan, David X Cifu","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001052","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand how traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinical severity and military factors were associated with the likelihood of receiving a TBI service-connected disability (SCD) determination and monthly total SCD compensation among Veterans.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>1 319 590 veterans with a VBA SCD rating who entered the VHA between October 1, 2000, and September 24, 2019.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed the association of TBI severity and military factors with a TBI SCD determination, TBI SCD rating percentage, and monthly total SCD compensation. Administrative VHA and VBA records were utilized.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Any TBI SCD determination, TBI SCD rating percentage, and monthly SCD compensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>93 911 (7.1%) Veterans had an SCD rating for TBI. TBI SCD increased monthly total compensation by $362 (95% CI 353, 370) in bivariate and $45 (95% CI 38, 52) in adjusted models. Females had lower TBI SCD percentage (-3.03; 95% CI -3.92, -2.14) but higher monthly compensation ($37; 95% CI 33, 42). TBI severity was associated with increasing TBI SCD percentage and monthly SCD compensation. In adjusted models, deployment (-2.36; 95% CI -3.02, -1.69) was associated with lower TBI SCD percentage but not monthly compensation, while combat exposure was not associated with TBI SCD percentage but was associated with higher compensation ($46; 95% CI 40, 53).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TBI severity was significantly associated with TBI SCD determination and TBI SCD rating percentage, in addition to overall SCD compensation. Although deployment was significantly associated with TBI SCD determination, non-deployment was associated with higher TBI SCD percent ratings. These results may be explained by TBI occurring in non-deployment military settings, such as training. This highlights the need to study risk for TBI in the general military environment to ensure that all military-related TBI exposures are recognized and that any related disability is appropriately compensated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"368-377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143752763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Collegiate Participation in Repetitive Head Impact Sports Does Not Adversely Affect Gait Dual Task Cost. 大学生参与重复性头部撞击运动不会对步态双任务成本产生不利影响。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001051
Thomas A Buckley, Kristen Williams, Jessie R Oldham, Katherine J Hunzinger, Caitlin Gallo, Scott W Passalugo, Barry Bodt, Melissa N Anderson, Kelsey Bryk, Barry A Munkasy

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess gait related dual task cost (DTC) changes over the course of a collegiate athletic career in both repetitive head impact (RHI) exposed and non-RHI exposed athletes.

Setting: University Research Laboratory.

Participants: We recruited 47 NCAA intercollegiate athletes and grouped by RHI exposed (N = 27) and non-RHI (N = 20) sports.

Design: Participants completed 5 trials of single task (ST) and 5 trials of dual task (DT) gait with a working memory cognitive challenge both prior to their collegiate athletic careers (pre) and then again after they completed their collegiate athletic careers (post) (mean 1173 ± 341 days between tests) in this prospective longitudinal design. To assess for changes over the course of a career, separate 2 (group: RHI, non-RHI) × 2 (time: pre, post) mixed design ANOVA were performed for each dependent variable of interest (DTC gait velocity and DTC step length) and the model was adjusted for concussion history at the time of test and sex.

Main measures: Gait velocity and step length DTC.

Results: There were no significant group by time interactions for DTC gait velocity (F = 0.517, P = .476, η 2 = 0.012) or DTC step length ((F = 0.206, P = .652, η 2 = 0.005).

Conclusions: The primary finding of this study indicated no difference between RHI exposed and non-RHI exposed athletes gait DTC performance between the beginning and conclusion of their collegiate athletic careers. While the long-term effects of RHI remain to be fully determined, these results suggest that RHI may not adversely affect ST or DT gait performance when the individual is young.

目的:本研究的目的是评估在大学运动生涯中,重复性头部撞击(RHI)暴露和非RHI暴露的运动员步态相关的双任务成本(DTC)变化。单位:大学研究实验室。参与者:我们招募了47名NCAA校际运动员,并根据RHI暴露(N = 27)和非RHI (N = 20)运动进行分组。设计:在这项前瞻性纵向设计中,参与者在大学运动生涯开始前(前)和完成大学运动生涯结束后(后)分别完成5项单任务(ST)和5项双任务(DT)步态和工作记忆认知挑战试验(平均测试间隔1173±341天)。为了评估职业生涯过程中的变化,对每个感兴趣的因变量(DTC步态速度和DTC步长)进行单独的2(组:RHI和非RHI) × 2(时间:前,后)混合设计方差分析,并根据测试时的脑震荡史和性别调整模型。主要测量:步态速度和步长DTC。结果:DTC步态速度(F = 0.517, P = .476, η2 = 0.012)、步长(F = 0.206, P = .652, η2 = 0.005)与时间交互作用无显著性差异。结论:本研究的主要发现表明,RHI暴露和非RHI暴露的运动员在其大学运动生涯开始和结束时的步态DTC表现没有差异。虽然RHI的长期影响仍有待完全确定,但这些结果表明,当个体年轻时,RHI可能不会对ST或DT步态表现产生不利影响。
{"title":"Collegiate Participation in Repetitive Head Impact Sports Does Not Adversely Affect Gait Dual Task Cost.","authors":"Thomas A Buckley, Kristen Williams, Jessie R Oldham, Katherine J Hunzinger, Caitlin Gallo, Scott W Passalugo, Barry Bodt, Melissa N Anderson, Kelsey Bryk, Barry A Munkasy","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001051","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess gait related dual task cost (DTC) changes over the course of a collegiate athletic career in both repetitive head impact (RHI) exposed and non-RHI exposed athletes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Research Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We recruited 47 NCAA intercollegiate athletes and grouped by RHI exposed (N = 27) and non-RHI (N = 20) sports.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants completed 5 trials of single task (ST) and 5 trials of dual task (DT) gait with a working memory cognitive challenge both prior to their collegiate athletic careers (pre) and then again after they completed their collegiate athletic careers (post) (mean 1173 ± 341 days between tests) in this prospective longitudinal design. To assess for changes over the course of a career, separate 2 (group: RHI, non-RHI) × 2 (time: pre, post) mixed design ANOVA were performed for each dependent variable of interest (DTC gait velocity and DTC step length) and the model was adjusted for concussion history at the time of test and sex.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Gait velocity and step length DTC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant group by time interactions for DTC gait velocity (F = 0.517, P = .476, η 2 = 0.012) or DTC step length ((F = 0.206, P = .652, η 2 = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary finding of this study indicated no difference between RHI exposed and non-RHI exposed athletes gait DTC performance between the beginning and conclusion of their collegiate athletic careers. While the long-term effects of RHI remain to be fully determined, these results suggest that RHI may not adversely affect ST or DT gait performance when the individual is young.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"329-336"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143752893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reciprocal Causation Among Pain, Physical Health, and Mental Health 1 Year Post-Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cross-Lagged Panel Model From the TRACK-TBI Study. 创伤性脑损伤后1年疼痛、身体健康和心理健康之间的相互因果关系:来自TRACK-TBI研究的交叉滞后面板模型
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000946
Carly Wender, Paul B Perrin, Denise Krch

Objective: To estimate the relative causal influence of physical and mental health on pain in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) within the year following injury.

Setting: Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) was a multicenter study that collected data from 18 level 1 trauma centers around the United States.

Participants: TRACK-TBI recruited adults who experienced an acute TBI. For this secondary analysis, participants were included if they endorsed pain during at least 1 follow-up within 1 year post-TBI.

Design: Secondary analysis using structural equation modeling of the longitudinal TRACK-TBI dataset of an inception cohort.

Interventions: None.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes are pain, physical health, and mental health. Pain was measured by averaging the T-scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity and Pain Interference scales. Physical and mental health were measured with the raw component scores (physical component score and mental component score, respectively) on the Short Form Health Survey.

Results: Eighty-nine percent of the TRACK-TBI cohort (n = 2022) reported pain throughout 1 year postinjury. This sample (n = 1796) was primarily white (77%) men (67%) in their early forties with mild (87%) closed head injuries (99%) related to motor or road vehicle accidents (57%). Based on the final trimmed model, there was a stronger dominance of pain on physical and mental health than physical and mental health on pain. Thus, pain is a bigger driver of physical and mental health than vice versa.

Conclusions: Persistent pain is highly prevalent post-TBI and is a bigger driver of physical and mental health 1 year post-TBI than the other way round. Future research should aim to better understand the causes of pain post-TBI to inform what treatments are most effective at reducing pain intensity and interference post-TBI.

目的:评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者一年内身心健康状况对疼痛的相对因果影响。背景:TBI研究和临床知识转化(TRACK-TBI)是一项多中心研究,收集了来自美国18个一级创伤中心的数据。参与者:TRACK-TBI招募了经历过急性TBI的成年人。在这一次要分析中,如果参与者在tbi后1年内至少1次随访中承认疼痛,则纳入受试者。设计:使用结构方程模型对初始队列的纵向TRACK-TBI数据集进行二次分析。干预措施:没有。主要结局和测量:主要结局是疼痛、身体健康和心理健康。通过患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛强度和疼痛干扰量表的t得分平均来测量疼痛。身体和心理健康是用简短健康调查的原始成分得分(分别是身体成分得分和心理成分得分)来衡量的。结果:89%的TRACK-TBI队列(n = 2022)报告损伤后1年内疼痛。该样本(n = 1796)主要是40岁出头的白人(77%)男性(67%),与机动车或道路交通事故(57%)相关的轻度(87%)闭合性头部损伤(99%)。根据最终的修正模型,疼痛对身心健康的影响比生理和心理健康对疼痛的影响更大。因此,疼痛是生理和心理健康的更大驱动力,而不是相反。结论:持续性疼痛在创伤性脑损伤后非常普遍,并且是创伤性脑损伤后1年的生理和心理健康的更大驱动因素。未来的研究应旨在更好地了解脑外伤后疼痛的原因,以告知哪些治疗方法最有效地减少脑外伤后疼痛强度和干扰。
{"title":"Reciprocal Causation Among Pain, Physical Health, and Mental Health 1 Year Post-Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cross-Lagged Panel Model From the TRACK-TBI Study.","authors":"Carly Wender, Paul B Perrin, Denise Krch","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000946","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000946","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the relative causal influence of physical and mental health on pain in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) within the year following injury.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) was a multicenter study that collected data from 18 level 1 trauma centers around the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>TRACK-TBI recruited adults who experienced an acute TBI. For this secondary analysis, participants were included if they endorsed pain during at least 1 follow-up within 1 year post-TBI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis using structural equation modeling of the longitudinal TRACK-TBI dataset of an inception cohort.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes are pain, physical health, and mental health. Pain was measured by averaging the T-scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity and Pain Interference scales. Physical and mental health were measured with the raw component scores (physical component score and mental component score, respectively) on the Short Form Health Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine percent of the TRACK-TBI cohort (n = 2022) reported pain throughout 1 year postinjury. This sample (n = 1796) was primarily white (77%) men (67%) in their early forties with mild (87%) closed head injuries (99%) related to motor or road vehicle accidents (57%). Based on the final trimmed model, there was a stronger dominance of pain on physical and mental health than physical and mental health on pain. Thus, pain is a bigger driver of physical and mental health than vice versa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistent pain is highly prevalent post-TBI and is a bigger driver of physical and mental health 1 year post-TBI than the other way round. Future research should aim to better understand the causes of pain post-TBI to inform what treatments are most effective at reducing pain intensity and interference post-TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"319-328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143365072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Video Head Impulse Test in Survivors From Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: New Perspectives for Implementation of Assessment in Rehabilitation. 严重创伤性脑损伤幸存者的视频头部冲击测试:康复评估实施的新视角。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001044
Nicola Ferri, Susan L Whitney, Luca Verrecchia, Laura Casagrande Conti, Andrea Turolla, Tommaso Lelli, Rita Formisano, Maria Gabriella Buzzi, Paolo Pillastrini, Leonardo Manzari, Marco Tramontano

Objective: This study aims to evaluate vestibular function by instrumental assessment of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) in survivors from severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) and analyze related clinical characteristics and functional balance scales.

Setting: This study was conducted on inpatients accepted at Santa Lucia Foundation-Neurorehabilitation Hospital for Research and Healthcare (Rome, Italy), from January to September 2023.

Participants: Twenty-one survivors from sTBI with a median age of 48 years (IQR = 27) were included in this study, recruited through the neurorehabilitation services. Participants were included if they had a Glasgow Coma Scale Score ≤ 8 at the time of injury, Level of Cognitive Functioning ≥ 7, static and dynamic balance impairments, ability to understand verbal commands, and Functional Ambulation Classification > 3.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Main measures: Two expert physiotherapists performed an aVOR assessment using the video Head ImpulseTest by both head impulse and suppression paradigms. Furthermore, all participants completed a balance assessment using the Berg Balance Scale and the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) scale. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed, and the relationship between aVOR function and balance outcomes was investigated.

Results: Nineteen participants (90%) displayed aVOR with an abnormal gain at least in 1 canal. Thirty percent of all canals analyzed had abnormal gains, with a clear prevalence of the right posterior canal (71%), which presents aVOR gain lower than the functional threshold on average (mean 0.70; CI, 0.62-0.78). No correlations were found between the aVOR gain and the clinical outcome measure scores.

Conclusion: Low aVOR gains were evident in people who experienced sTBI. A comprehensive evaluation of the vestibular peripheral system may detect vestibular impairments in these patients that may otherwise be unrecognized.

目的:本研究旨在通过仪器检测重度颅脑损伤(sTBI)患者前庭角眼反射(aVOR),评价其前庭功能,并分析相关临床特征和功能平衡量表。背景:本研究于2023年1月至9月在意大利罗马Santa Lucia Foundation-Neurorehabilitation Hospital for Research and Healthcare (Rome, Italy)住院患者中进行。参与者:21名中位年龄为48岁(IQR = 27)的sTBI幸存者通过神经康复服务纳入本研究。如果参与者在受伤时格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8分,认知功能水平≥7,静态和动态平衡障碍,理解口头命令的能力和功能行走分类bbbb3,则纳入受试者。设计:横断面研究。主要测量方法:两名专业物理治疗师使用视频头部冲动测试进行aVOR评估,包括头部冲动和抑制范式。此外,所有参与者都完成了使用伯格平衡量表和迷你平衡评估系统测试(迷你最佳)量表的平衡评估。进行描述性统计分析,并调查aVOR函数与平衡结果之间的关系。结果:19名参与者(90%)出现aVOR,至少在1根管中异常增加。所分析的所有管中有30%有异常增益,其中右侧后管明显流行(71%),其aVOR增益平均低于功能阈值(平均0.70;CI, 0.62 - -0.78)。aVOR增益与临床结果测量评分之间未发现相关性。结论:在经历过sTBI的人群中,aVOR的增加很明显。对前庭外周系统的全面评估可以发现这些患者可能未被识别的前庭损伤。
{"title":"Video Head Impulse Test in Survivors From Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: New Perspectives for Implementation of Assessment in Rehabilitation.","authors":"Nicola Ferri, Susan L Whitney, Luca Verrecchia, Laura Casagrande Conti, Andrea Turolla, Tommaso Lelli, Rita Formisano, Maria Gabriella Buzzi, Paolo Pillastrini, Leonardo Manzari, Marco Tramontano","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001044","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate vestibular function by instrumental assessment of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) in survivors from severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) and analyze related clinical characteristics and functional balance scales.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted on inpatients accepted at Santa Lucia Foundation-Neurorehabilitation Hospital for Research and Healthcare (Rome, Italy), from January to September 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-one survivors from sTBI with a median age of 48 years (IQR = 27) were included in this study, recruited through the neurorehabilitation services. Participants were included if they had a Glasgow Coma Scale Score ≤ 8 at the time of injury, Level of Cognitive Functioning ≥ 7, static and dynamic balance impairments, ability to understand verbal commands, and Functional Ambulation Classification > 3.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Two expert physiotherapists performed an aVOR assessment using the video Head ImpulseTest by both head impulse and suppression paradigms. Furthermore, all participants completed a balance assessment using the Berg Balance Scale and the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) scale. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed, and the relationship between aVOR function and balance outcomes was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen participants (90%) displayed aVOR with an abnormal gain at least in 1 canal. Thirty percent of all canals analyzed had abnormal gains, with a clear prevalence of the right posterior canal (71%), which presents aVOR gain lower than the functional threshold on average (mean 0.70; CI, 0.62-0.78). No correlations were found between the aVOR gain and the clinical outcome measure scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low aVOR gains were evident in people who experienced sTBI. A comprehensive evaluation of the vestibular peripheral system may detect vestibular impairments in these patients that may otherwise be unrecognized.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"337-345"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143605168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1