European Journal of Heart Failure最新文献

Aims: For many years, fluid and sodium restriction have been considered an essential strategy for achieving effective decongestion in acute heart failure (AHF), but this paradigm has recently been questioned. This analysis aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three different fluid strategies for decongestion: no fluid, fluid with sodium/chloride, and fluid without sodium/chloride in AHF.

Methods: This post-hoc analysis of two prospective, single-centre, mechanistic studies included 55 patients with AHF and fluid overload. All patients received standardized furosemide dosing. A total of 21 patients received a continuous infusion of 0.9% NaCl (83 mL/h), 19 patients received 5% glucose (83 mL/h), and 15 did not receive any fluids. The primary outcome is urine volume and natriuresis at 6 h after loop diuretic administration.

Results: There was a significant difference in cumulative (6 h) net natriuresis between patients receiving fluid therapy (n = 40) and those without fluid therapy (n = 15) (139 [66-264] mmol vs. 79 [15-144] mmol, P = .043). There was no significant difference in cumulative net diuresis between these groups (1170 [880-1890] mL vs. 1010 [475-1270] mL, P = .078), respectively. The NaCl group had a better diuretic response when compared with the glucose and no-fluids groups (absolute: 1980 [1620-3150] mL vs. 1510 [1075-2175] mL vs. 1010 [475-1270] mL, P < .001, net: 1480 [1120-2650] mL vs. 1010 [575-1675] mL vs. 1010 [475-1270] mL, P = .019, respectively) but the difference in natriuresis did not meet statistical significance (P = .126).

Conclusion: Intravenous fluid replacement during decongestion in patients with AHF was associated with increased net natriuresis and a trend towards higher urine output, with a significant augmentation of diuresis with sodium chloride supplementation.

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) hospitalizations are frequent and lengthy, and usually involve treatment with intravenous diuretics to relieve congestion. SUBCUT HF II is evaluating the safety and efficacy of an alternative ambulatory care strategy using a novel subcutaneous formulation of furosemide delivered via a wearable pump.

Methods: The SUBCUT HF II trial is a multicentre, randomized, active comparator trial involving 20 hospitals in the UK. Eligible participants are patients with HF receiving inpatient treatment with intravenous loop diuretic. Patients are randomized to either early supported discharge, using a novel formulation of subcutaneous furosemide (SQIN-Furosemide) administered by a wearable pump (SQIN-Infusor), or continued inpatient treatment using intravenous furosemide.

Results: The primary endpoint is days spent alive and out of hospital at 30 days. As of October 2025, 168 of 170 patients have been randomized.

Conclusion: The SUBCUT HF II trial is testing the safety and efficacy of an ambulatory care approach to managing patients presenting to the hospital with HF.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05419115.

Aims: Qiliqiangxin (QLQX), a Chinese traditional medicine, improved outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) when added to guideline-directed therapy. As treatment effects in heart failure (HF) may vary with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), this post hoc analysis of the QUEST (Qiliqiangxin in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality) trial examined whether baseline LVEF modified the efficacy and safety of QLQX.

Methods: QUEST randomized 3110 patients with symptomatic HF and LVEF ≤40%. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or first HF hospitalization. Baseline LVEF was categorized as ≤25% (n = 482), >25-30% (n = 692), >30-35% (n = 829), and >35% (n = 1107).

Results: Mean LVEF was 32% (median 33%, interquartile range 28%-37%). Patients with LVEF ≤25% had the highest rate of the primary outcome (25.4 per 100 patient-years), while rates were similar across higher LVEF groups (18.7-19.8). After multivariable adjustment, lower LVEF was independently associated with higher risks of the primary outcome and mortality. The effect of QLQX on the primary outcome was consistent across LVEF categories (hazard ratio [95% CI] from the lowest to highest: 0.91 [0.64-1.30], 0.65 [0.47-0.89], 0.94 [0.71-1.26], and 0.71 [0.55-0.91], respectively; Pinteraction = .28), and as a continuous variable (Pinteraction = .45). Similar results were observed for individual components and total HF hospitalizations (all Pinteraction > .10). The safety of QLQX was also consistent across LVEF categories.

Conclusion: In patients with HFrEF, lower LVEF was associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. QLQX reduced cardiovascular events consistently across the range of LVEF examined in QUEST, despite the limited use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors.

Chictr registration: ChiCTR1900021929.

Aims: Heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF) and mildly reduced (HFmrEF) ejection fraction are prevalent, yet frequently underdiagnosed syndromes associated with high morbidity and mortality, impaired quality of life, and escalating healthcare expenditures. Although guideline-directed medications like SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of hospitalization and cardiovascular death, their use remains limited and substantial residual risk persists. This trial aims to evaluate the safety and performance of a novel left-atrium-to-coronary-sinus shunt (Edwards APTURE transcatheter shunt system) in HFpEF and HFmrEF patients.

Methods: ALT-FLOW II is a prospective multi-centre, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded (patient and assessor) trial. Approximately 100 symptomatic HF patients aged ≥18 years with left ventricular ejection fraction >40% and exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥25 mm Hg with a PCWP to right atrial pressure gradient ≥8 mm Hg will be randomized 1:1 to the APTURE shunt vs sham control. Key exclusion criteria include severe HF, significant valvular disease, and more than mild right ventricular dysfunction. The primary endpoints are the safety of the APTURE device at 30 days and change in workload-corrected PCWP normalized to bodyweight at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include changes in patient-reported outcomes, and hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters through 5 years. The trial will also explore the impact of the device on short-term cardiac remodelling and intra-cardiac flow patterns using multi-modality imaging.

Conclusions: The ALT-FLOW II trial will evaluate the safety and performance of the APTURE system in symptomatic HFpEF and HFmrEF patients with elevated left atrial pressure.

Aims: To evaluate whether circulating N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) can stage hypertensive heart disease (HHD), by assessing their association with adverse cardiac remodelling and cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with essential hypertension.

Methods and results: The REMODEL study prospectively enrolled 1054 asymptomatic individuals with essential hypertension and no prior cardiovascular diseases (59 ± 11 years old; systolic blood pressure 131 ± 14 mmHg; left ventricular ejection fraction 60 ± 7%). All participants underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and blood sampling for NT-proBNP and hsTnT. The primary outcome was a composite of acute coronary syndromes, heart failure hospitalization, stroke and all-cause mortality. Median follow-up was 53 (23, 72) months. Maximal log-rank statistic identified thresholds of 152 pg/ml for NT-proBNP and 12.7 pg/ml for hsTnT. Individuals with elevations in both biomarkers (high-risk) were older, had the highest 24-h systolic blood pressure and more diabetes mellitus. They showed the most adverse CMR phenotype, with increased myocardial mass, greater diffuse and replacement fibrosis, impaired left ventricular strain and higher left atrial volumes. Event rates differed significantly across biomarker strata (log-rank P < .001). High-risk individuals had the greatest hazard of cardiovascular events [hazard ratio (HR) 17.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.12-36.09), while intermediate-risk individuals showed intermediate risk (HR 3.44; 95% CI 1.71-6.94).

Conclusion: NT-proBNP and hsTnT are complementary biomarkers that not only predict cardiovascular outcomes and but also reflect the severity of cardiac remodelling in HHD. Their combined use enables effective staging of disease severity and may support stage-specific management strategies in patients with hypertension.