Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery最新文献

Background: Endovascular transvenous embolization (TVE) was developed as a curative technique for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) with small nidi and a single draining vein. We describe a partial transvenous embolization technique (pTVE) as an intermediate embolization session to decrease hemorrhagic complications of larger nidi with multiple venous outlets.

Method: We reviewed our single-center database of bAVMs treated endovascularly between January 2023 and March 2024. Six consecutive patients underwent 10 sessions of pTVE for ruptured AVMs.

Results: The median age of patients was 24.5 years. The median nidus size was 5 cm (range 4-6 cm). Three patients had grade III lesions according to the Spetzler-Martin classification, two were grade IV, and one was grade V. Four patients had draining veins with multiple efferent veins with each collecting vein, one patient had multiple efferent veins with one collecting vein, and one patient had one efferent vein with a long bifurcation. pTVE achieved partial occlusion in all cases without any hemorrhagic complications. One patient had the AVM totally occluded with two sessions of pTVE. Decision-making was facilitated by creating subcategories of venous angioarchitecture and detailing the technical particularities in the corresponding category.

Conclusion: We described a novel treatment technique of transvenous embolization as an adjunct strategy for large bAVMs.

Background: Machine learning (ML) may be superior to traditional methods for clinical outcome prediction. We sought to systematically review the literature on ML for clinical outcome prediction in cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed, and original studies of patients undergoing cerebrovascular surgeries or endovascular procedures that developed a supervised ML model to predict a postoperative outcome or complication were included.

Results: A total of 60 studies predicting 71 outcomes were included. Most cohorts were derived from single institutions (66.7%). The studies included stroke (32), subarachnoid hemorrhage ((SAH) 16), unruptured aneurysm (7), arteriovenous malformation (4), and cavernous malformation (1). Random forest was the best performing model in 12 studies (20%) followed by XGBoost (13.3%). Among 42 studies in which the ML model was compared with a standard statistical model, ML was superior in 33 (78.6%). Of 10 studies in which the ML model was compared with a non-ML clinical prediction model, ML was superior in nine (90%). External validation was performed in 10 studies (16.7%). In studies predicting functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy the pooled area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC) of the test set performances was 0.84 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.88). For studies predicting outcomes after SAH, the pooled AUROCs for functional outcomes and delayed cerebral ischemia were 0.89 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.98), respectively.

Conclusion: ML performs favorably for clinical outcome prediction in cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery. However, multicenter studies with external validation are needed to ensure the generalizability of these findings.

Background: Large and giant intracranial aneurysms pose treatment challenges. The benefit-risk balance of flow diverters (FDs) alone versus FDs with coiling remains unclear. This study aimed to compare these two strategies.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science was performed up to October 2024. Studies comparing FDs with or without adjunctive coiling in large/giant intracranial aneurysms were included. The primary outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion, defined by the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification. Additional outcomes included procedural and postprocedural complications. Data were analyzed using a random effects model.

Results: 15 studies with 1130 patients were analyzed, with 557 in the FD alone group and 573 in the FD+coiling group. The meta-analysis revealed that FD+coiling significantly improved complete aneurysm occlusion rates (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.40, P=0.03). While overall ischemic complications were significantly lower in the FD alone group, a sensitivity analysis showed no significant difference (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.23, P=0.13). Subgroup analysis of fusiform aneurysms showed no significant difference in complete aneurysm occlusion rates (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.40, P=0.82). Procedural and hemorrhagic complications did not differ significantly, and no publication bias was detected in the results.

Conclusions: Combining FDs with coiling improved complete aneurysm occlusion rates in large and giant saccular intracranial aneurysms, although the impact on complications remains controversial. Further investigation into the benefit-risk ratio of this combined approach is warranted.

Background: Transient cortical blindness is a rare complication after cerebral angiography. We report an unusual case of face blindness (prosopagnosia) in a patient who underwent diagnostic cerebral angiography for an incidentally discovered left middle cerebral artery aneurysm. The patient experienced difficulty recognizing faces 3 hours postprocedure, with resolution of symptoms within 24 hours.

Objective: To carry out a systematic review of transient cortical blindness after cerebral angiography to investigate factors associated with, and management of, this rare phenomenon.

Methods: The review was conducted using PubMed and Embase, with search terms related to cerebral angiography and transient blindness. Included studies reported transient cortical blindness after diagnostic or interventional cerebral angiography and detailed patient demographics, procedural specifics, onset and resolution of blindness, and postprocedural imaging findings.

Results: Twenty-two articles involving 63 patients were identified. Most cases (n=54, 85.7%) were associated with diagnostic procedures. All nine interventional cases involved cerebral aneurysm treatments. Forty-two (66.7%) patients experienced complete blindness, with an average onset of 2 hours postprocedure and resolution within 82 hours (range 6 hours-21 days). Postprocedural neuroimaging abnormalities were observed in 24 (53.3%) cases, mainly showing contrast enhancement in the occipital lobe. All patients recovered vision.

Conclusions: Our review highlights the rarity of prosopagnosia after cerebral angiography, a rare variant of cortical blindness. The findings suggest that cortical blindness resolves spontaneously within a short period. Although complete visual loss is more commonly reported in the literature, facial recognition deficits are rare. Awareness of transient cortical blindness after cerebral angiography is essential for accurate diagnosis and management.

Background: Previous studies have shown that when thrombectomy has failed, rescue intracranial stenting is associated with better clinical outcomes compared with failed reperfusion. However, comparative data regarding stent type are lacking.

Objective: To compare the procedural and clinical outcomes of balloon-mounted stents (BMS) with those of self-expandable stents (SES).

Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database from the Stenting and Angioplasty in NeuroThrombectomy (SAINT) consortium. Patients were included if thrombectomy had failed and they then underwent rescue emergency stenting. Patients treated with SES or BMS were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary outcome was the final reperfusion as measured by the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) Scale. Safety measures included rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, procedural complications, and 90-day mortality.

Results: A total of 328 patients were included. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were well balanced among both groups. The BMS group (n=127) had higher rates of successful reperfusion (94.5% vs 86.6%, aOR=4.23, 95% CI 1.57 to 11.37, P=0.004) and increased likelihood of higher degree of final reperfusion on the mTICI Scale (acOR=2.06, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.57, P=0.01) than the SES group (n=201). No difference in modified Rankin Scale shift (acOR=0.98, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.79, P=0.95), rates of mRS0-2 (26% vs 36%, aOR=0.93, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.88, P=0.83) and mRS0-3 (43% vs 50%, aOR=0.92, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.66, P=0.77) at 90 days were noted. Safety measures were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion: The present study demonstrates higher reperfusion rates with BMS than with SES in failed thrombectomy procedures that involved rescue stenting. No differences in hemorrhagic complications or clinical outcomes were noted. Further larger controlled studies are warranted.

Background: The contact aspiration (CA) technique is often used to perform endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, rescue strategies are necessary if CA fails to achieve recanalization. This study investigates the outcomes of incorporating stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy in the rescue strategy following failed CA.

Methods: EVT patients with failed CA attempts were identified from a large multicenter registry and stratified by rescue technique: CA alone or incorporating SR in the rescue strategy. Outcomes included successful recanalization, 90-day functional outcomes (defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality.

Results: Among 1885 patients with failed CA attempts, conversion to SR was associated with higher recanalization rates (85.2% vs 80.6%; p=0.03), higher rates of second-pass recanalization (31.2% vs 23.4%; p<0.001), and better 90-day outcomes (mRS 0-2: 35.2% vs 29.9%; p=0.04) when compared with repeated CA attempts. Trevo SRs showed higher odds of successful recanalization (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.9; p=0.02), second-pass recanalization (aOR=1.7; p=0.01), and reduced odds of sICH (aOR=0.3; p=0.02). EmboTrap SRs were associated with higher odds of 90-day mortality (aOR=2.6; p=0.004) and sICH (aOR=2.9; p=0.04) and lower odds of recanalization (aOR=0.5; p=0.03).

Conclusions: Incorporating SR in the rescue strategy after a failed CA improves recanalization rates and functional outcomes. Trevo SRs demonstrated superior efficacy and safety when incorporated into the rescue strategy.

Background: The periprocedural management of antithrombotic medications in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) after middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) or surgical evacuation is uncertain.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted across Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We pooled proportions and risk ratios (RRs) for the meta-analysis with the corresponding 95% CIs. Systemic and intracranial (including recurrence) bleeding complications and thromboembolic events were evaluated.

Results: Of the 16 included studies with 4606 patients, 1784 were receiving antithrombotic medications. Antithrombotic therapy was resumed in 1231 patients (69.0%). Bleeding complications were similar between patients in whom antithrombotic therapy was resumed (14.1%, 95% CI 9.7% to 20.2%) and in those in whom it was discontinued (15.4%, 95% CI 7.4% to 29.3%). After MMAE, patients had similar rates of bleeding events (12.1%, 95% CI 4.9% to 27.0%) to patients with overall treated cSDH, and recurrence (RR 2.28, 95% CI 0.46 to 11.37) and reoperation (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.917) risks were similar between the resumed and discontinued groups. Thromboembolic complications were significantly higher in the discontinued group (12.6%, 95% CI 6.5% to 23.0%) than in the resumption group (3.5%, 95% CI 1.8% to 6.9%). Earlier resumption (1 week to 1 month) was associated with a lower thromboembolic risk without increasing bleeding complications.

Conclusions: Post-procedural antithrombotic resumption may reduce thromboembolic events without significantly increasing bleeding risk. Early resumption of antithrombotics post-MMAE appears to be safe, although further data are required to confirm this observation. Future studies should aim to better define patient characteristics influencing decision-making in this context.

Background: Intrasaccular devices have broadened treatment options for wide necked aneurysms. This study presents the preliminary experience with the Artisse 2.0 device.

Methods: Innovative NeurovaScular Product SurveIllance REgistry (INSPIRE) is a non-randomized, multicenter, real world clinical study with treatment arms for aneurysms (INSPIRE-A) and acute ischemic stroke (INSPIRE-S). This interim analysis included 87 patients enrolled from November 2022 to April 2024 in the INSPIRE-A Artisse cohort across 16 Europoean centers. Procedures followed standard clinical care, with 6 months of follow-up. Safety and efficacy endpoints included major stroke, neurological death, serious adverse events (SAEs), aneurysm occlusion, and retreatment rates. An independent core laboratory assessed imaging, and all SAEs were reviewed by a clinical events committee. The Artisse steering committee provided independent oversight of the data.

Results: The Artisse device achieved an overall successful implantation rate of 96.6% (84/87), with satisfactory placement rates of 98.7% (74/75) for unruptured and 88.9% (8/9) for ruptured aneurysms. Following the procedure, 46.2% of unruptured aneurysm patients were receiving antiplatelet therapy (APT), predominantly aspirin monotherapy, while no ruptured aneurysm patients received APT. Device related SAE rate was 1.3% (1/87), and the overall stroke rate was 2.3% (2/87), including both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. At 6 months, 80.0% (28/35) of patients with unruptured aneurysms showed complete obliteration, with no recurrences or retreatments.

Conclusions: Preliminary experience with the Artisse 2.0 device demonstrated high technical success, favorable safety, and efficacy in aneurysm obliteration at 6 months. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings.

Background: The safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes associated with infective endocarditis (IE) compared with medical management (MM) is unclear.

Methods: In this nationwide analysis of hospitalizations in the United States, we assessed the outcomes of EVT versus medical management (MM) for patients with LVO and IE. Primary outcome was routine home discharge with self-care. Secondary outcomes include home discharge, in-hospital mortality, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for confounders. Additional multivariable adjustments were performed for doubly robust analyses.

Results: 2574 patients were identified; 656 (25.5%) received EVT. After PSM, the rate of routine discharge was significantly higher for patients with EVT compared with MM (14.6% vs 8.5%, p=0.021), and patients with EVT had significantly higher rate of home discharge (34.5% vs 26.5%, p=0.041), lower rate of in-hospital death (14.8% vs 25.2%, p=0.002), and lower rate of ICH (15.8% vs 23.1%, p=0.039). EVT was not associated with a different rate of SAH compared with MM (11.2% vs 7.9%, p=0.17). These associations remained unchanged with additional multivariable adjustments.

Conclusion: For patients with LVO stroke and IE, EVT was associated with significantly higher odds of favorable hospitalization outcomes and lower odds of ICH compared with MM.