Background: Fear of disease progression (FoP) is a common psychological concern among patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). However, heterogeneity in FoP and the role of psychological resilience before treatment remain insufficiently understood.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients with UIAs scheduled for endovascular treatment were recruited. FoP was assessed using the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-12), and psychological resilience was measured with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25). Latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to identify distinct FoP profiles. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression followed by multinomial logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with profile membership.
Results: Five distinct FoP profiles were identified: Minimal Fear-Good Adjustment, Mild Emotionally Elevated Fear, Moderate Emotionally Reactive Fear, Moderate Functionally Concerned Fear, and High Pervasive Fear. Multinomial logistic regression showed that higher psychological resilience-particularly the tenacity dimension-was associated with lower odds of belonging to the Mild Emotionally Elevated Fear, Moderate Emotionally Reactive Fear, and Moderate Functionally Concerned Fear profiles, compared with the Minimal Fear-Good Adjustment profile. No significant association was observed between tenacity and the High Pervasive Fear profile. Sensitivity analyses using alternative resilience indicators yielded consistent results.
Conclusion: Among patients with UIAs prior to endovascular treatment, FoP exhibits marked heterogeneity. Psychological resilience, especially tenacity, is differentially associated with specific FoP profiles. These findings support the value of profile-based psychological assessment to inform targeted psychosocial support during treatment planning.
背景:疾病进展恐惧(Fear of disease progression, FoP)是未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)患者常见的心理问题。然而,FoP的异质性和治疗前心理弹性的作用仍然没有得到充分的了解。方法:在这项横断面研究中,招募了计划进行血管内治疗的UIAs患者。使用进度恐惧问卷-短表(top - q -12)评估FoP,使用Connor-Davidson弹性量表(CD-RISC-25)测量心理弹性。采用潜在剖面分析(LPA)鉴定不同的FoP剖面。最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归,然后使用多项逻辑回归来检查与轮廓隶属度相关的因素。结果:确定了五种不同的FoP特征:最小恐惧-良好调整,轻度情绪提升恐惧,中度情绪反应性恐惧,中度功能性担忧恐惧和高度普遍恐惧。多项逻辑回归显示,与最小恐惧-良好调整特征相比,较高的心理弹性——特别是韧性维度——与属于轻度情绪提升恐惧、中度情绪反应性恐惧和中度功能关注恐惧特征的几率较低相关。在坚韧和高普遍性恐惧之间没有观察到显著的联系。使用其他弹性指标的敏感性分析得出了一致的结果。结论:在血管内治疗前的UIAs患者中,FoP表现出明显的异质性。心理弹性,特别是韧性,与特定的FoP特征有不同的联系。这些发现支持了基于档案的心理评估在治疗计划期间为有针对性的社会心理支持提供信息的价值。
{"title":"Pre-treatment fear of disease progression profiles and psychological resilience among patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms.","authors":"Wei Wang, XiaoXu Han, Xin Xu, LiFang Zhu, XiaoFang Huang","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2026-025036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2026-025036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fear of disease progression (FoP) is a common psychological concern among patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). However, heterogeneity in FoP and the role of psychological resilience before treatment remain insufficiently understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, patients with UIAs scheduled for endovascular treatment were recruited. FoP was assessed using the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-12), and psychological resilience was measured with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25). Latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to identify distinct FoP profiles. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression followed by multinomial logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with profile membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five distinct FoP profiles were identified: Minimal Fear-Good Adjustment, Mild Emotionally Elevated Fear, Moderate Emotionally Reactive Fear, Moderate Functionally Concerned Fear, and High Pervasive Fear. Multinomial logistic regression showed that higher psychological resilience-particularly the tenacity dimension-was associated with lower odds of belonging to the Mild Emotionally Elevated Fear, Moderate Emotionally Reactive Fear, and Moderate Functionally Concerned Fear profiles, compared with the Minimal Fear-Good Adjustment profile. No significant association was observed between tenacity and the High Pervasive Fear profile. Sensitivity analyses using alternative resilience indicators yielded consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with UIAs prior to endovascular treatment, FoP exhibits marked heterogeneity. Psychological resilience, especially tenacity, is differentially associated with specific FoP profiles. These findings support the value of profile-based psychological assessment to inform targeted psychosocial support during treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147365834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2026-025184
Sumit Kumar Sonu, Yohanna Kusuma, Peter J Mitchell, Thanh Phan, Henry Ma, Bernard Yan
{"title":"Medium vessel occlusion thrombectomy: one positive and three negative trials to signal better patient selection.","authors":"Sumit Kumar Sonu, Yohanna Kusuma, Peter J Mitchell, Thanh Phan, Henry Ma, Bernard Yan","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2026-025184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2026-025184","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147365718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-04DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2025-024875
Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Joanna Roy, Basel Musmar, Nassos Tziviskos, Arbaz A Momin, Wi Jin Kim, Michael Rizzuto, Nathaniel Ellens, Rabab Alshahrani, Elias Atallah, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal Jabbour
Introduction: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterized by elevated intracranial pressure, papilledema, and neurological symptoms. When medical management fails, treatment options include venous sinus stenting (VSS) and ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). Comparative data on cost effectiveness remain limited. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes, healthcare utilization, and costs between VSS and VPS in patients with IIH using a propensity score weighted analysis.
Methods: This was a retrospective single center study. Baseline characteristics, complications, reoperations, unplanned 30 day emergency department visits and readmissions, unsatisfactory treatment response, salvage procedures, and inflation adjusted index procedure costs were collected. Propensity score weighting with overlap weights was applied to balance covariates. Weighted regression analyses were used to compare outcomes between groups.
Results: 139 patients were treated with VSS (n=99) or VPS (n=40). Baseline characteristics were well balanced after overlap weighting. Inflation adjusted index procedure costs and length of stay were similar between the VSS and VPS groups. VSS was associated with significantly lower rates of any complication (3.5% vs 37.7%, P<0.001), unplanned 30 day emergency department visits (11.1% vs 36.6%, P=0.002), 30 day readmissions (1.3% vs 33%, P<0.001), and reoperations, including revisions and surgically treated complications (1.3% vs 30.9%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in unsatisfactory treatment response, need for salvage procedures, or overall subsequent procedures.
Conclusions: While initial costs and clinical outcomes were similar, VPS was associated with higher complication rates, more revision related reoperations, and greater short term healthcare utilization. These findings suggest that VSS may provide a safer and more cost effective approach for patients with IIH who have failed medical therapy.
{"title":"Venous sinus stenting versus ventriculoperitoneal shunting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: propensity score weighted, cost consequence analysis.","authors":"Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Joanna Roy, Basel Musmar, Nassos Tziviskos, Arbaz A Momin, Wi Jin Kim, Michael Rizzuto, Nathaniel Ellens, Rabab Alshahrani, Elias Atallah, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal Jabbour","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024875","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024875","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterized by elevated intracranial pressure, papilledema, and neurological symptoms. When medical management fails, treatment options include venous sinus stenting (VSS) and ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). Comparative data on cost effectiveness remain limited. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes, healthcare utilization, and costs between VSS and VPS in patients with IIH using a propensity score weighted analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single center study. Baseline characteristics, complications, reoperations, unplanned 30 day emergency department visits and readmissions, unsatisfactory treatment response, salvage procedures, and inflation adjusted index procedure costs were collected. Propensity score weighting with overlap weights was applied to balance covariates. Weighted regression analyses were used to compare outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>139 patients were treated with VSS (n=99) or VPS (n=40). Baseline characteristics were well balanced after overlap weighting. Inflation adjusted index procedure costs and length of stay were similar between the VSS and VPS groups. VSS was associated with significantly lower rates of any complication (3.5% vs 37.7%, P<0.001), unplanned 30 day emergency department visits (11.1% vs 36.6%, P=0.002), 30 day readmissions (1.3% vs 33%, P<0.001), and reoperations, including revisions and surgically treated complications (1.3% vs 30.9%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in unsatisfactory treatment response, need for salvage procedures, or overall subsequent procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While initial costs and clinical outcomes were similar, VPS was associated with higher complication rates, more revision related reoperations, and greater short term healthcare utilization. These findings suggest that VSS may provide a safer and more cost effective approach for patients with IIH who have failed medical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147355461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-04DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2025-024541
Thomas Snyder, Brian Jankowitz, Osama O Zaidat, Rishi Gupta, Ricardo A Hanel, Ashutosh P Jadhav, David N Loy, Donald Frei, Adnan Siddiqui, Ajit S Puri, Aquilla S Turk, Adel M Malek, Eric Sauvageau, Steven W Hetts, Ahmad Khaldi
Background: Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) is an effective, safe, and durable treatment option when considering embolizing wide neck aneurysms. While there are many techniques, the two most common involve jailing a microcatheter behind the stent versus re-crossing the interstices. Despite both techniques being performed in practice, there is a lack of comparison data. This study uses the ATLAS Investigational Device Exemption trial to compare the safety and efficacy of various SAC techniques.
Methods: A total of 298 aneurysms in as many patients were treated in 25 centers with Neuroform Atlas SAC. Technique choice was determined by the operator and involved jailing, re-crossing, or others (jailing followed by re-crossing, stenting followed by re-crossing at a different time). Patient demographics, aneurysm shape, dimension, and location, as well as the number of coils and procedure duration, were analyzed. Procedure and device complications of the different techniques were recorded. Efficacy was evaluated with a core-lab adjudicated 12-month digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
Results: Similar aneurysm size and location were observed between the two groups (jailing and re-crossing). There was no significant difference in the number of coils used or the duration of the procedure. There was no significant difference in Raymond-Roy I occlusion rate (89.4% vs 83.9%) at the 12-month DSA or safety events at 12 months.
Conclusion: There were no significant differences in safety or efficacy for SAC between the jailing or re-crossing technique.
背景:支架辅助盘绕术(SAC)是一种有效、安全、持久的治疗方法,可用于栓塞宽颈动脉瘤。虽然有许多技术,但最常见的两种技术包括在支架后面放置微导管和重新穿过间隙。尽管这两种技术在实践中都得到了应用,但缺乏比较数据。本研究使用ATLAS试验性器械豁免试验来比较各种SAC技术的安全性和有效性。方法:在25个中心使用Neuroform Atlas SAC对298例患者进行治疗。技术选择由操作者决定,包括监禁、再交叉或其他(监禁后再交叉,支架置入后在不同时间再交叉)。分析了患者的人口统计学特征、动脉瘤的形状、尺寸和位置,以及线圈的数量和手术时间。记录不同技术的手术过程和器械并发症。通过核心实验室判定的12个月数字减影血管造影(DSA)评估疗效。结果:两组(入狱组和再交组)动脉瘤大小和位置相似。在使用的线圈数量和手术时间上没有显著差异。在12个月的DSA或12个月的安全事件中,Raymond-Roy I闭塞率(89.4% vs 83.9%)无显著差异。结论:监禁法和再交叉法在SAC的安全性和有效性上无显著差异。
{"title":"Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coiling: jailing versus re-crossing techniques.","authors":"Thomas Snyder, Brian Jankowitz, Osama O Zaidat, Rishi Gupta, Ricardo A Hanel, Ashutosh P Jadhav, David N Loy, Donald Frei, Adnan Siddiqui, Ajit S Puri, Aquilla S Turk, Adel M Malek, Eric Sauvageau, Steven W Hetts, Ahmad Khaldi","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024541","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024541","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) is an effective, safe, and durable treatment option when considering embolizing wide neck aneurysms. While there are many techniques, the two most common involve jailing a microcatheter behind the stent versus re-crossing the interstices. Despite both techniques being performed in practice, there is a lack of comparison data. This study uses the ATLAS Investigational Device Exemption trial to compare the safety and efficacy of various SAC techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 298 aneurysms in as many patients were treated in 25 centers with Neuroform Atlas SAC. Technique choice was determined by the operator and involved jailing, re-crossing, or others (jailing followed by re-crossing, stenting followed by re-crossing at a different time). Patient demographics, aneurysm shape, dimension, and location, as well as the number of coils and procedure duration, were analyzed. Procedure and device complications of the different techniques were recorded. Efficacy was evaluated with a core-lab adjudicated 12-month digital subtraction angiography (DSA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar aneurysm size and location were observed between the two groups (jailing and re-crossing). There was no significant difference in the number of coils used or the duration of the procedure. There was no significant difference in Raymond-Roy I occlusion rate (89.4% vs 83.9%) at the 12-month DSA or safety events at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no significant differences in safety or efficacy for SAC between the jailing or re-crossing technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147355405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-04DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2025-024846
Guillaume Tessier, Gaspard Gerschenfeld, Jonathan Cortese, Laurent Spelle, Laura Venditti, Nicolas Chausson, Didier Smadja, Stephane Olindo, Gaultier Marnat, Guillaume Turc, Wagih Ben Hassen, Pierre Seners, Michel Piotin, Emmanuel Wiener, Fernando Pico, Frédéric Clarençon, Sonia Alamowitch, Jildaz Caroff
Background: Thrombus migration (TM) is more common after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with tenecteplase (TNK) compared with alteplase. We aimed to determine TM impact over endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) results in patients undergoing TNK-IVT for acute ischemic stroke.
Methods: We retrospectively included all patients with large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation, treated with TNK-IVT and eligible for EVT between January 2015 and February 2021, from a large observational TNK registry (Tenecteplase Treatment in Ischemic Stroke-TETRIS). TM was defined by a distal shift of the occlusion site between initial non-invasive imaging and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) before endovascular thrombectomy. We compared angiographic (revised Treatment In Cerebral Infarction-rTICI) and functional (modified Rankin Scale-mRS) outcomes in cases of TM versus no TM.
Results: Out of 580 enrolled patients, TM occurred between the initial imaging and the first DSA run in 209 (36.0%) of them. TM led to EVT being impossible to perform in 26% of cases (vs 4% in absence of TM). Longer needle-to-groin time and shorter susceptibility vessel sign length were independently associated with TM. Rates of successful recanalization (rTICI 2b/3) were similar between groups. However, we observed higher rates of excellent (rTICI 2c/3) (64.8% vs 51.7%, P=0.02) and complete reperfusion (rTICI 3) (46.6% vs 27.8%, P<0.001) in the absence of TM, but with no impact on clinical outcomes (mRS 0-2=44.7% in the non-migration group vs 47.1% in the migration group; P=0.59).
Conclusion: TM is a frequent and time-related consequence of TNK-IVT that hinders recanalization rates but does not impact functional outcomes.
背景:与阿替普酶相比,替奈替普酶(TNK)静脉溶栓(IVT)后血栓迁移(TM)更为常见。我们的目的是确定TM对接受TNK-IVT治疗急性缺血性卒中患者血管内血栓切除术(EVT)结果的影响。方法:我们回顾性地纳入了2015年1月至2021年2月期间所有接受TNK- ivt治疗且符合EVT条件的前循环大血管闭塞患者,这些患者来自大型观察性TNK登记(Tenecteplase治疗缺血性卒中-俄罗斯方块)。TM的定义是在血管内取栓前,闭塞部位在初始无创成像和数字减影血管造影(DSA)之间的远端移位。我们比较了血管造影(修订后的脑梗死治疗- rtici)和功能(修订后的Rankin量表- mrs)在TM和非TM病例中的结果。结果:580例入组患者中,209例(36.0%)在首次影像学检查和首次DSA检查之间发生TM。在26%的病例中,TM导致EVT无法执行(而在没有TM的情况下,这一比例为4%)。针刺到腹股沟时间较长,敏感血管征象长度较短与TM独立相关。两组间再通成功率(rTICI 2b/3)相似。然而,我们观察到更高的优等率(rTICI 2c/3) (64.8% vs 51.7%, P=0.02)和完全再灌注率(rTICI 3) (46.6% vs 27.8%)。结论:TM是TNK-IVT的常见和时间相关的后果,它阻碍了再通率,但不影响功能结局。
{"title":"When lysis moves the target: thrombus migration after tenecteplase and its impact on endovascular recanalization.","authors":"Guillaume Tessier, Gaspard Gerschenfeld, Jonathan Cortese, Laurent Spelle, Laura Venditti, Nicolas Chausson, Didier Smadja, Stephane Olindo, Gaultier Marnat, Guillaume Turc, Wagih Ben Hassen, Pierre Seners, Michel Piotin, Emmanuel Wiener, Fernando Pico, Frédéric Clarençon, Sonia Alamowitch, Jildaz Caroff","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024846","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thrombus migration (TM) is more common after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with tenecteplase (TNK) compared with alteplase. We aimed to determine TM impact over endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) results in patients undergoing TNK-IVT for acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included all patients with large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation, treated with TNK-IVT and eligible for EVT between January 2015 and February 2021, from a large observational TNK registry (Tenecteplase Treatment in Ischemic Stroke-TETRIS). TM was defined by a distal shift of the occlusion site between initial non-invasive imaging and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) before endovascular thrombectomy. We compared angiographic (revised Treatment In Cerebral Infarction-rTICI) and functional (modified Rankin Scale-mRS) outcomes in cases of TM versus no TM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 580 enrolled patients, TM occurred between the initial imaging and the first DSA run in 209 (36.0%) of them. TM led to EVT being impossible to perform in 26% of cases (vs 4% in absence of TM). Longer needle-to-groin time and shorter susceptibility vessel sign length were independently associated with TM. Rates of successful recanalization (rTICI 2b/3) were similar between groups. However, we observed higher rates of excellent (rTICI 2c/3) (64.8% vs 51.7%, P=0.02) and complete reperfusion (rTICI 3) (46.6% vs 27.8%, P<0.001) in the absence of TM, but with no impact on clinical outcomes (mRS 0-2=44.7% in the non-migration group vs 47.1% in the migration group; P=0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TM is a frequent and time-related consequence of TNK-IVT that hinders recanalization rates but does not impact functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147355403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-03DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2025-024795
Diwas Gautam, Matthew C Findlay, Jackson Aubrey, Julian Brown, Michael T Bounajem, Danielle C Brown, Manisha Koneru, Leonardo Cruz-Criollo, Anderson Brito Alvarado, Robert C Rennert, Craig J Kilburg, Karol P Budohoski, Edgar A Samaniego, Ajith J Thomas, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Daniel A Tonetti, Ramesh Grandhi
Background: Previous studies favoring the use of balloon guide catheters (BGCs) during endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke either predate advancements in catheter technology or inadequately adjust for large-bore aspiration catheters. This study compared angiographic and clinical outcomes for stroke thrombectomy performed without and with BGCs.
Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed matched anterior circulation thrombectomy cases performed between February 2018 and February 2024. BGC and non-BGC cases were 1:1 matched by demographic and clinical variables. Primary outcome measures were successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2B) and good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 at discharge and 30 days).
Results: Among 407 patients (non-BGC=199, BGC=208), BGC use had higher rates of successful reperfusion (83.9% vs 90.9%, P=0.034) and better functional outcomes at discharge (18.7% vs 28.4%, P=0.022) and 30 days (21.1% vs 31.3%, P=0.020). On multivariable analysis, BGC independently predicted successful reperfusion (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.77, P=0.02) and good outcomes at discharge (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.07, P=0.01) and 30 days (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.03, P=0.01). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that BGC use was most beneficial in patients with times from last known well to puncture ≤6 hours, with higher rates of successful reperfusion (84.5% vs 94.6%, P=0.041) and favorable outcomes at discharge (14.5% vs 32.4%, P=0.007) and 30 days (23.8% vs 39.2%, P=0.037).
Conclusion: BGC use during endovascular thrombectomy is associated with higher rates of successful reperfusion and better early functional outcomes, particularly in patients treated within 6 hours of last-known-well time.
背景:先前的研究倾向于在前循环急性缺血性卒中的血管内血栓切除术中使用球囊导尿管(bgc),这些研究要么早于导管技术的进步,要么没有充分调整大口径穿刺导管。该研究比较了无bgc和有bgc的脑卒中取栓术的血管造影和临床结果。方法:本多中心回顾性研究分析了2018年2月至2024年2月期间进行的匹配前循环血栓切除术病例。BGC和非BGC病例在人口学和临床变量上1:1匹配。主要结局指标为再灌注成功(脑梗死≥2B改良溶栓)和良好的临床结局(出院时和30天改良Rankin量表评分0-2)。结果:407例患者(非BGC=199, BGC=208)中,BGC的再灌注成功率较高(83.9% vs 90.9%, P=0.034),出院时(18.7% vs 28.4%, P=0.022)和30天(21.1% vs 31.3%, P=0.020)功能预后较好。在多变量分析中,BGC独立预测再灌注成功(OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.56 ~ 3.77, P=0.02)和出院时(OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.14 ~ 3.07, P=0.01)和30天(OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.18 ~ 3.03, P=0.01)的良好预后。亚组分析显示,BGC在从最后一次已知时间到穿刺时间≤6小时的患者中最有益,再灌注成功率较高(84.5%对94.6%,P=0.041),出院时(14.5%对32.4%,P=0.007)和30天(23.8%对39.2%,P=0.037)的预后良好。结论:在血管内取栓术中使用BGC与更高的再灌注成功率和更好的早期功能预后相关,特别是在最后已知时间6小时内治疗的患者。
{"title":"Angiographic and clinical outcomes following endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation ischemic stroke: impact of balloon guide catheter utilization.","authors":"Diwas Gautam, Matthew C Findlay, Jackson Aubrey, Julian Brown, Michael T Bounajem, Danielle C Brown, Manisha Koneru, Leonardo Cruz-Criollo, Anderson Brito Alvarado, Robert C Rennert, Craig J Kilburg, Karol P Budohoski, Edgar A Samaniego, Ajith J Thomas, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Daniel A Tonetti, Ramesh Grandhi","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024795","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024795","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies favoring the use of balloon guide catheters (BGCs) during endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke either predate advancements in catheter technology or inadequately adjust for large-bore aspiration catheters. This study compared angiographic and clinical outcomes for stroke thrombectomy performed without and with BGCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed matched anterior circulation thrombectomy cases performed between February 2018 and February 2024. BGC and non-BGC cases were 1:1 matched by demographic and clinical variables. Primary outcome measures were successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2B) and good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 at discharge and 30 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 407 patients (non-BGC=199, BGC=208), BGC use had higher rates of successful reperfusion (83.9% vs 90.9%, P=0.034) and better functional outcomes at discharge (18.7% vs 28.4%, P=0.022) and 30 days (21.1% vs 31.3%, P=0.020). On multivariable analysis, BGC independently predicted successful reperfusion (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.77, P=0.02) and good outcomes at discharge (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.07, P=0.01) and 30 days (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.03, P=0.01). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that BGC use was most beneficial in patients with times from last known well to puncture ≤6 hours, with higher rates of successful reperfusion (84.5% vs 94.6%, P=0.041) and favorable outcomes at discharge (14.5% vs 32.4%, P=0.007) and 30 days (23.8% vs 39.2%, P=0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BGC use during endovascular thrombectomy is associated with higher rates of successful reperfusion and better early functional outcomes, particularly in patients treated within 6 hours of last-known-well time.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147348485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-24DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2025-024702
Pedro Lylyk, Charles C Matouk, Ricardo A Hanel, John F Reavey-Cantwell, Howard A Riina, David J Altschul, Adnan H Siddiqui, Justin F Fraser, Koji C Ebersole, Tarun Bhalla, Matthew T Bender, Christopher S Ogilvy, Philipp Taussky, Amanda Baker, Mahesh V Jayaraman, Ivan Lylyk, Nicolas Perez, Carlos Bleise, Esteban Scrivano, Pedro N Lylyk, Kamil W Nowicki, Andrew B Koo, Joseph Antonios, Brandon M Beneduce, Elad I Levy, Carl B Heilman, Adel M Malek
Objective: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a neurological condition characterized by impaired gait, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence. Endovascular shunting using the eShunt Implant diverts cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from basal cisterns to the internal jugular vein via a transvenous, transfemoral procedure. We report initial eShunt safety data for treatment of NPH through 90 days in a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial.
Methods: NPH participants indicated for endovascular shunt placement were included after exhibiting positive gait response to lumbar CSF withdrawal and candidate anatomy. NPH symptoms at baseline and following eShunt Implant placement were assessed using the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test for gait, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for cognition, and Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score-Short Form (NBSS-SF) for urinary symptoms. The primary endpoint was the rate of device and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE) at 90-day follow-up.
Results: Sixty-six participants were treated with the eShunt Implant without immediate or delayed cerebral hemorrhage, over-drainage, infection or device-related SAEs. Two procedure-related SAEs (3.0%) occurred, one sigmoid sinus thrombosis and one femoral artery pseudoaneurysm, both resolved without surgical intervention. Matched-pair analysis showed statistically significant improvements in TUG time (37.2%; P<0.0001), MoCA score (+2.3; P<0.0001), and NBSS-SF score (-2.1; P<0.002).
Conclusions: Endovascular shunting for NPH was feasible with a low rate of SAEs typically associated with conventional shunt surgery. An acceptable clinical response through 90 days was observed. These findings suggest further investigation of this minimally invasive, endovascular approach to NPH in a randomized controlled trial comparing to standard of care.
Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT05250505 and NCT05232838.
目的:常压脑积水(NPH)是一种以步态受损、认知能力下降和尿失禁为特征的神经系统疾病。使用eShunt植入物的血管内分流术通过经静脉、经股手术将脑脊液从基底池转移到颈内静脉。我们在一项前瞻性、多中心、单臂试验中报告eShunt治疗NPH 90天的初步安全性数据。方法:在对腰椎脑脊液退出和候选解剖表现出积极的步态反应后,NPH参与者被纳入血管内分流器放置。基线和eShunt植入后的NPH症状采用步态的Timed Up & Go (TUG)测试、认知的蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和泌尿症状的神经源性膀胱症状评分-短表(NBSS-SF)进行评估。主要终点是90天随访期间设备和/或手术相关严重不良事件(SAE)的发生率。结果:66名受试者使用eShunt植入物治疗,无立即或延迟性脑出血、过度引流、感染或设备相关的SAEs。发生了2例手术相关的SAEs(3.0%), 1例乙状窦血栓形成和1例股动脉假性动脉瘤,均无手术干预。配对分析显示,TUG时间有统计学意义(37.2%);结论:血管内分流治疗NPH是可行的,通常与传统分流手术相关的SAEs发生率较低。在90天内观察到可接受的临床反应。这些发现表明,在一项随机对照试验中,对这种微创血管内入路治疗NPH进行进一步的研究,并与标准治疗进行比较。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05250505和NCT05232838。
{"title":"Safety of endovascular shunting for normal pressure hydrocephalus from a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study.","authors":"Pedro Lylyk, Charles C Matouk, Ricardo A Hanel, John F Reavey-Cantwell, Howard A Riina, David J Altschul, Adnan H Siddiqui, Justin F Fraser, Koji C Ebersole, Tarun Bhalla, Matthew T Bender, Christopher S Ogilvy, Philipp Taussky, Amanda Baker, Mahesh V Jayaraman, Ivan Lylyk, Nicolas Perez, Carlos Bleise, Esteban Scrivano, Pedro N Lylyk, Kamil W Nowicki, Andrew B Koo, Joseph Antonios, Brandon M Beneduce, Elad I Levy, Carl B Heilman, Adel M Malek","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024702","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024702","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a neurological condition characterized by impaired gait, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence. Endovascular shunting using the eShunt Implant diverts cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from basal cisterns to the internal jugular vein via a transvenous, transfemoral procedure. We report initial eShunt safety data for treatment of NPH through 90 days in a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NPH participants indicated for endovascular shunt placement were included after exhibiting positive gait response to lumbar CSF withdrawal and candidate anatomy. NPH symptoms at baseline and following eShunt Implant placement were assessed using the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test for gait, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for cognition, and Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score-Short Form (NBSS-SF) for urinary symptoms. The primary endpoint was the rate of device and/or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE) at 90-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six participants were treated with the eShunt Implant without immediate or delayed cerebral hemorrhage, over-drainage, infection or device-related SAEs. Two procedure-related SAEs (3.0%) occurred, one sigmoid sinus thrombosis and one femoral artery pseudoaneurysm, both resolved without surgical intervention. Matched-pair analysis showed statistically significant improvements in TUG time (37.2%; P<0.0001), MoCA score (+2.3; P<0.0001), and NBSS-SF score (-2.1; P<0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endovascular shunting for NPH was feasible with a low rate of SAEs typically associated with conventional shunt surgery. An acceptable clinical response through 90 days was observed. These findings suggest further investigation of this minimally invasive, endovascular approach to NPH in a randomized controlled trial comparing to standard of care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT05250505 and NCT05232838.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147284392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-23DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2025-024733
William Diprose, Robert Fahed, David Volders, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Mouhammad Jumaa, Shahid M Nimjee, Aravind Ganesh, Thomas C Booth, Brian H Buck, James Kennedy, Jai Shankar, Franziska Dorn, Liqun Zhang, Christian Hametner, Sandor Nardai, Mohamad Abdalkader, Bijoy K Menon, Andrew M Demchuk, Michael D Hill, Mayank Goyal, Johanna M Ospel
Background: Randomized trials showed that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) did not improve outcomes in medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) stroke compared with usual care. We investigated whether patients randomized to EVT who achieved near-complete/complete reperfusion had improved clinical outcomes compared with patients randomized to usual care.
Methods: Post-hoc analysis of ESCAPE-MeVO, which randomized patients with MeVO stroke to undergo EVT in addition to usual care or usual care only. Reperfusion grade in EVT patients was assessed with the MeVO expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (meTICI) score. Regression analyses were used to compare clinical outcomes between EVT patients with near-complete/complete (meTICI 2c-3) reperfusion and usual care patients, and the association between reperfusion grade and clinical outcomes in EVT patients.
Results: Overall, 253 of 255 (99.2%) patients randomized to EVT had final meTICI scores, of whom 133 (52.2%) achieved meTICI 2c-3 reperfusion. Infarct volumes were lower in EVT meTICI 2c-3 patients than in usual care patients, but there were no significant differences between EVT meTICI 2c-3 and usual care patients for 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (adjusted common OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.75). Higher final meTICI scores were associated with improved 90-day mRS and lower infarct volumes in EVT patients.
Conclusion: Although higher reperfusion grade was associated with smaller infarct volumes, there was no statistically significant difference in 90-day mRS between patients achieving meTICI 2c-3 and those receiving usual care.
{"title":"Reperfusion grade and clinical outcome following medium vessel occlusion thrombectomy in the Endovascular Treatment to Improve Outcomes for Medium Vessel Occlusions (ESCAPE-MeVO) trial.","authors":"William Diprose, Robert Fahed, David Volders, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Mouhammad Jumaa, Shahid M Nimjee, Aravind Ganesh, Thomas C Booth, Brian H Buck, James Kennedy, Jai Shankar, Franziska Dorn, Liqun Zhang, Christian Hametner, Sandor Nardai, Mohamad Abdalkader, Bijoy K Menon, Andrew M Demchuk, Michael D Hill, Mayank Goyal, Johanna M Ospel","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024733","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024733","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized trials showed that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) did not improve outcomes in medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) stroke compared with usual care. We investigated whether patients randomized to EVT who achieved near-complete/complete reperfusion had improved clinical outcomes compared with patients randomized to usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hoc analysis of ESCAPE-MeVO, which randomized patients with MeVO stroke to undergo EVT in addition to usual care or usual care only. Reperfusion grade in EVT patients was assessed with the MeVO expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (meTICI) score. Regression analyses were used to compare clinical outcomes between EVT patients with near-complete/complete (meTICI 2c-3) reperfusion and usual care patients, and the association between reperfusion grade and clinical outcomes in EVT patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 253 of 255 (99.2%) patients randomized to EVT had final meTICI scores, of whom 133 (52.2%) achieved meTICI 2c-3 reperfusion. Infarct volumes were lower in EVT meTICI 2c-3 patients than in usual care patients, but there were no significant differences between EVT meTICI 2c-3 and usual care patients for 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (adjusted common OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.75). Higher final meTICI scores were associated with improved 90-day mRS and lower infarct volumes in EVT patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although higher reperfusion grade was associated with smaller infarct volumes, there was no statistically significant difference in 90-day mRS between patients achieving meTICI 2c-3 and those receiving usual care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-20DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2025-024359
Demetrius Lopes, Ricardo A Hanel, Vania Anagnostakou, Nicole M Cancelliere, Jens Fiehler, Ivan Lylyk, Pedro N Lylyk, Aymeric Rouchaud, Géraud Forestier, Adel M Malek, Kunal Vakharia, Maxim Mokin, Christopher S Ogilvy, Eric Osborn, Hiram Bezerra, Shiro Uemura, Adnan Siddiqui, Tommy Andersson, Matthew J Gounis, Pedro Lylyk, Vitor M Pereira, Giovanni J Ughi
Angiography remains the standard imaging modality for evaluating vascular disease and guiding endovascular interventions; however, its limited spatial resolution restricts visualization of vessel wall pathology and therapeutic devices. Over the past decade, intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) has emerged as a transformative tool in coronary artery disease. OCT provides three-dimensional, high-resolution imaging of coronary arteries, enabling assessment of vessel wall microstructure, plaque composition, lumen geometry, and stent deployment. This level of detail has advanced the understanding of coronary pathology and contributed to improved outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions. Major cardiology societies now recommend the use of intravascular imaging, including OCT, for complex coronary interventions with level 1A evidence.OCT is now expanding beyond the coronary vasculature, with growing interest in its potential role in neurointerventional surgery. While limited use of OCT has been reported in the neurovasculature, the characteristics of a coronary OCT device prevent routine use in intracranial arteries. A new generation of intravascular OCT technology has been developed for the tortuous and complex anatomy of cerebral vessels. Early clinical experience has investigated its safety, feasibility, and utility for intracranial vascular imaging. Neuro-dedicated OCT technology could represent a significant advancement in cerebrovascular imaging, offering insights beyond the capabilities of current modalities, with the potential to improve current understanding of neurovascular pathology and refine diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Successful translation of OCT into neurointervention, however, also requires establishing principles for image interpretation to assess neurovascular disease and therapeutic devices. This article aims to provide guidance for interpreting OCT imaging of intracranial arteries. In addition, it reviews applications of OCT in neurointervention and describes the development of neuro-specific OCT technology.
{"title":"Development, image interpretation, clinical experience, and applications of optical coherence tomography in neurointerventional surgery.","authors":"Demetrius Lopes, Ricardo A Hanel, Vania Anagnostakou, Nicole M Cancelliere, Jens Fiehler, Ivan Lylyk, Pedro N Lylyk, Aymeric Rouchaud, Géraud Forestier, Adel M Malek, Kunal Vakharia, Maxim Mokin, Christopher S Ogilvy, Eric Osborn, Hiram Bezerra, Shiro Uemura, Adnan Siddiqui, Tommy Andersson, Matthew J Gounis, Pedro Lylyk, Vitor M Pereira, Giovanni J Ughi","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Angiography remains the standard imaging modality for evaluating vascular disease and guiding endovascular interventions; however, its limited spatial resolution restricts visualization of vessel wall pathology and therapeutic devices. Over the past decade, intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) has emerged as a transformative tool in coronary artery disease. OCT provides three-dimensional, high-resolution imaging of coronary arteries, enabling assessment of vessel wall microstructure, plaque composition, lumen geometry, and stent deployment. This level of detail has advanced the understanding of coronary pathology and contributed to improved outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions. Major cardiology societies now recommend the use of intravascular imaging, including OCT, for complex coronary interventions with level 1A evidence.OCT is now expanding beyond the coronary vasculature, with growing interest in its potential role in neurointerventional surgery. While limited use of OCT has been reported in the neurovasculature, the characteristics of a coronary OCT device prevent routine use in intracranial arteries. A new generation of intravascular OCT technology has been developed for the tortuous and complex anatomy of cerebral vessels. Early clinical experience has investigated its safety, feasibility, and utility for intracranial vascular imaging. Neuro-dedicated OCT technology could represent a significant advancement in cerebrovascular imaging, offering insights beyond the capabilities of current modalities, with the potential to improve current understanding of neurovascular pathology and refine diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Successful translation of OCT into neurointervention, however, also requires establishing principles for image interpretation to assess neurovascular disease and therapeutic devices. This article aims to provide guidance for interpreting OCT imaging of intracranial arteries. In addition, it reviews applications of OCT in neurointervention and describes the development of neuro-specific OCT technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146258540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-18DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2025-024619
Alperen Elek, Cem Bilgin, Sherief Ghozy, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes
Background: Ischemic stroke is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children, yet no clinical trials have evaluated mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in this population. Consequently, in contrast to adults, pediatric MT remains an off-label intervention. This meta-analysis aimed to assess its safety and efficacy and compare outcomes with medical management (MM).
Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to identify original studies reporting outcomes of MT, with or without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in pediatric ischemic stroke. In studies that concurrently reported MT±IVT and MM±IVT within the same study, outcomes from the MM arms were also extracted for comparative analysis.
Results: Eighteen studies encompassing 612 pediatric patients were included. The pooled successful recanalization rate (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b-3) after mechanical thrombectomy was 88.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 85.65 to 92.06), and 43.9% (95% CI, 38.67 to 49.09) achieved complete recanalization (TICI 3). Favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) occurred in 78.6% (95% CI, 69.58 to 87.61) of patients, with mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates of 3.9% (95% CI, 1.88 to 5.92) and 1.3% (95% CI, 1.07 to 2.58), respectively. Shift analysis demonstrated a significant overall improvement in functional outcomes with MT±IVT compared with MM±IVT (common (OR), 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.63; P<0.001).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that MT has a favorable safety and efficacy profile, resulting in a more favorable mRS shift compared with MM in pediatric ischemic stroke. Further research is needed to identify the pediatric stroke patients who are likely to benefit from MT.
{"title":"Mechanical thrombectomy versus medical management for pediatric ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.","authors":"Alperen Elek, Cem Bilgin, Sherief Ghozy, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024619","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024619","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic stroke is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children, yet no clinical trials have evaluated mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in this population. Consequently, in contrast to adults, pediatric MT remains an off-label intervention. This meta-analysis aimed to assess its safety and efficacy and compare outcomes with medical management (MM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to identify original studies reporting outcomes of MT, with or without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in pediatric ischemic stroke. In studies that concurrently reported MT±IVT and MM±IVT within the same study, outcomes from the MM arms were also extracted for comparative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies encompassing 612 pediatric patients were included. The pooled successful recanalization rate (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b-3) after mechanical thrombectomy was 88.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 85.65 to 92.06), and 43.9% (95% CI, 38.67 to 49.09) achieved complete recanalization (TICI 3). Favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) occurred in 78.6% (95% CI, 69.58 to 87.61) of patients, with mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates of 3.9% (95% CI, 1.88 to 5.92) and 1.3% (95% CI, 1.07 to 2.58), respectively. Shift analysis demonstrated a significant overall improvement in functional outcomes with MT±IVT compared with MM±IVT (common (OR), 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.63; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that MT has a favorable safety and efficacy profile, resulting in a more favorable mRS shift compared with MM in pediatric ischemic stroke. Further research is needed to identify the pediatric stroke patients who are likely to benefit from MT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146220091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}