Pub Date : 2018-12-15DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_020
Penelope J. E. Davies
{"title":"Constructing, Deconstructing and Reconstructing Civic Memory in Late Republican Rome","authors":"Penelope J. E. Davies","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122910210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-15DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_004
M. Chassignet
Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome: Omnium Annalium Monumenta is a major collection of essays by distinguished authors on the development of Roman historiography.
罗马共和时期的历史写作和历史证据:《历史年鉴》是一本由杰出作家撰写的关于罗马史学发展的重要文集。
{"title":"L’“archéologie” de Rome dans les Annales d’Ennius : poetica fabula ou annalium monumentum?","authors":"M. Chassignet","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_004","url":null,"abstract":"Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome: Omnium Annalium Monumenta is a major collection of essays by distinguished authors on the development of Roman historiography.","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120993237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-15DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_014
Marianna Scapini
Ciò su cui rifletteremo nelle prossime pagine rappresenta una particolare sfaccettatura di un vasto fenomeno letterario e, più in generale, culturale, di cui mi sono occupata in una mia recente monografia.1 Si tratta della tendenza ad evocare, e talvolta a ricalcare con precisione, trame greche – da opere storiche, ma anche poetiche – da parte degli storiografi di Roma, soprattutto nella trattazione delle fasi più arcaiche della storia della città. Il tema è di indubbio interesse, poiché attesta l’esistenza di una intensa e feconda interazione culturale non solo tra gli intellettuali ellenici e Romani – non dobbiamo dimenticare, comunque, il fatto che molti storiografi di Roma furono greci, o di cultura greca – ma anche tra generi letterari dal diverso statuto e differenti obiettivi, quali, appunto, storiografia e poesia epica e tragica, fenomeno che ha suscitato negli ultimi quindici anni un animato dibattito critico.2 In particolare, parlando di echi dalle tragedie tebane nelle storie di Roma, mi riferisco a tutte quelle citazioni, più o meno volontarie, di situazioni e personaggi della saga dei Labdacidi da parte degli storici dell’Urbe. Come vedremo, le sezioni di storia romana che sembrano più aperte ad accogliere questi riferimenti riguardano soprattutto episodi bellici. Ciò è coerente con quanto suggeriscono Levene e Nelis, e cioè che i temi della storiografia e della poesia epico-tragica tendano a sovrapporsi soprattutto quando si tratta di guerre e battaglie.3
{"title":"Echi dalle tragedie tebane nelle storie di Roma arcaica","authors":"Marianna Scapini","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_014","url":null,"abstract":"Ciò su cui rifletteremo nelle prossime pagine rappresenta una particolare sfaccettatura di un vasto fenomeno letterario e, più in generale, culturale, di cui mi sono occupata in una mia recente monografia.1 Si tratta della tendenza ad evocare, e talvolta a ricalcare con precisione, trame greche – da opere storiche, ma anche poetiche – da parte degli storiografi di Roma, soprattutto nella trattazione delle fasi più arcaiche della storia della città. Il tema è di indubbio interesse, poiché attesta l’esistenza di una intensa e feconda interazione culturale non solo tra gli intellettuali ellenici e Romani – non dobbiamo dimenticare, comunque, il fatto che molti storiografi di Roma furono greci, o di cultura greca – ma anche tra generi letterari dal diverso statuto e differenti obiettivi, quali, appunto, storiografia e poesia epica e tragica, fenomeno che ha suscitato negli ultimi quindici anni un animato dibattito critico.2 In particolare, parlando di echi dalle tragedie tebane nelle storie di Roma, mi riferisco a tutte quelle citazioni, più o meno volontarie, di situazioni e personaggi della saga dei Labdacidi da parte degli storici dell’Urbe. Come vedremo, le sezioni di storia romana che sembrano più aperte ad accogliere questi riferimenti riguardano soprattutto episodi bellici. Ciò è coerente con quanto suggeriscono Levene e Nelis, e cioè che i temi della storiografia e della poesia epico-tragica tendano a sovrapporsi soprattutto quando si tratta di guerre e battaglie.3","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127912835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-15DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_013
D. Pausch
{"title":"Livy’s Battle in the Forum between Roman Monuments and Greek Literature","authors":"D. Pausch","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125547576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-15DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_005
Hans Beck
The study of documentary evidence is pivotal for the historian. As always, Herodotus sets the benchmark. When visiting Thebes in Boeotia, Herodotus was intrigued by a series of inscribed tripods in the Temple of Apollo Ismenios that allowed him not only to reconstruct the genealogy of the Labdakids of Thebes – or independently confirm his reconstruction of it – but also to explore the early history of writing in Greece (5.59–61). Documentary evidence thus provided external authority to the apodeixis of Herodotus’ inquiries, and has continued to do so ever since throughout the history of the genre. From tangible objects with tiny scribbles to modern day statistics, which are essentially nothing more than hyper-convoluted compilations of external data, documentary evidence amplifies the interpretative force of the display of history. The world of republican Rome was full of tangible objects that had their own histories to tell. Modern historians have given much consideration to the countless monuments in the city of Rome and its places of memory, both in examinations of individual lieux de mémoire and in systematic memory studies. From this emerges an increasingly thick description of Rome and its memorial cityscape in the era of the Republic; incidentally, it is worthwhile asserting that this description of memory markers at Rome, and the message and meaning they convey, has become more compact, if not crowded, than that of any other urban realm in premodern times.1 Documentary evidence, understood in a very broad way, comes in shapes and sizes that tend to be less imposing than those of magnificent monuments.
{"title":"The Discovery of Numa’s Writings: Roman Sacral Law and the Early Historians","authors":"Hans Beck","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_005","url":null,"abstract":"The study of documentary evidence is pivotal for the historian. As always, Herodotus sets the benchmark. When visiting Thebes in Boeotia, Herodotus was intrigued by a series of inscribed tripods in the Temple of Apollo Ismenios that allowed him not only to reconstruct the genealogy of the Labdakids of Thebes – or independently confirm his reconstruction of it – but also to explore the early history of writing in Greece (5.59–61). Documentary evidence thus provided external authority to the apodeixis of Herodotus’ inquiries, and has continued to do so ever since throughout the history of the genre. From tangible objects with tiny scribbles to modern day statistics, which are essentially nothing more than hyper-convoluted compilations of external data, documentary evidence amplifies the interpretative force of the display of history. The world of republican Rome was full of tangible objects that had their own histories to tell. Modern historians have given much consideration to the countless monuments in the city of Rome and its places of memory, both in examinations of individual lieux de mémoire and in systematic memory studies. From this emerges an increasingly thick description of Rome and its memorial cityscape in the era of the Republic; incidentally, it is worthwhile asserting that this description of memory markers at Rome, and the message and meaning they convey, has become more compact, if not crowded, than that of any other urban realm in premodern times.1 Documentary evidence, understood in a very broad way, comes in shapes and sizes that tend to be less imposing than those of magnificent monuments.","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122032321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-15DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_007
Duncan E. Macrae
{"title":"Diligentissumus investigator antiquitatis? ‘Antiquarianism’ and Historical Evidence between Republican Rome and the Early Modern Republic of Letters","authors":"Duncan E. Macrae","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129338424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-15DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_010
Francisco Pina Polo
{"title":"How Much History did the Romans Know? Historical References in Cicero’s Speeches to the People","authors":"Francisco Pina Polo","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131938865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-15DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_015
M. Fazio
{"title":"Figures of Memory. Aulus Vibenna, Valerius Publicola and Mezentius between History and Legend","authors":"M. Fazio","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134408207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}