首页 > 最新文献

Journal of midwifery & women's health最新文献

英文 中文
Systematic Reviews to Inform Practice, January/February, 2025 为实践提供信息的系统审查,2025年1月/ 2月
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13736
Abby Howe-Heyman CNM, PhD, Nena R. Harris CNM, PhD, FNP-BC, CNE
{"title":"Systematic Reviews to Inform Practice, January/February, 2025","authors":"Abby Howe-Heyman CNM, PhD, Nena R. Harris CNM, PhD, FNP-BC, CNE","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13736","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 1","pages":"176-185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13736","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
World Health Organization Calls for Transition to Midwifery Models of Care to Improve Outcomes for Women and Newborns 世界卫生组织呼吁向助产护理模式过渡,以改善妇女和新生儿的结局。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13739
Melissa D. Avery CNM, PhD

As we welcome 2025 and begin celebrating 70 years of the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) and the Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health (JMWH), a recent World Health Organization (WHO) report1 should be in the hands of every practicing midwife. In the United States in particular, this position paper can help promote midwifery care models at the federal, state, local, and health system practice levels. WHO recommends a transition to midwifery care models worldwide, linked to a strategy of primary health care as part of attaining universal health coverage.

WHO urges moving from fragmented and risk-focused care approaches to midwifery models of care so that women and newborns receive “equitable, person-centred, respectful, integrated and high-quality care, provided and coordinated by midwives working within collaborative interdisciplinary teams”1(p8) prior to pregnancy through the postpartum period. The report notes that while the terms women and mothers are used, the recommendations are inclusive of all individuals identifying as women and all persons who give birth. Although improvements have been made in maternal and neonatal outcomes globally, many challenges remain. Improvements are needed in both access to health care and the provision of high-quality care. In addition, inappropriate use of medical interventions is highlighted as a barrier to improving perinatal outcomes.

Midwifery models of care are defined as those consistent with midwifery philosophy and where the care is provided by autonomous midwives who are educated, licensed, and regulated. Midwives provide high-quality care that is person-centered, based on a relationship between the midwife and the woman, promotes physiologic processes, with interventions used only when needed. Care is coordinated within resourced and functional health systems where interprofessional teams function with respect and trust. These care models are modifiable to be used in all care settings and related contexts.1

Principles of midwifery models of care include (1) access to equitable and human rights–based care for all women and newborns, (2) person-centered and respectful care in a partnership between women and midwives, (3) high-quality care consistent with midwifery philosophy, (4) care provided by autonomous, educated, regulated midwives throughout health systems, and (5) midwives are integrated into interprofessional care teams.1 By using models incorporating these principles, WHO believes a transition to midwifery models can save lives, improve women's and newborns' health outcomes, improve satisfaction with care, reduce health inequities, promote women's rights, and maximize the use of health care resources.1

In making the case for midwifery care models, the WHO report synthesizes recent research and other repo

在我们迎来2025年并开始庆祝美国护士助产士学院(ACNM)和《助产学杂志》成立70周年之际。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)最近的一份报告《妇女健康》(JMWH)应该掌握在每一位执业助产士手中。特别是在美国,本立场文件可以帮助在联邦、州、地方和卫生系统实践层面推广助产护理模式。世卫组织建议在世界范围内过渡到与初级卫生保健战略相结合的助产保健模式,作为实现全民健康覆盖的一部分。世卫组织敦促从分散和以风险为重点的护理方法转向助产护理模式,以便妇女和新生儿在怀孕前到产后期间获得“由跨学科合作团队中的助产士提供和协调的公平、以人为本、尊重、综合和高质量的护理”1(p8)。报告指出,虽然使用了妇女和母亲这两个术语,但这些建议包括所有被认定为妇女的个人和所有生育的人。尽管全球孕产妇和新生儿结局有所改善,但仍存在许多挑战。在获得保健和提供高质量保健方面都需要改进。此外,不适当使用医疗干预措施是改善围产期结局的一个障碍。助产护理模式被定义为与助产理念相一致的模式,并且由受过教育、有执照和受监管的自主助产士提供护理。助产士提供以人为本的高质量护理,基于助产士和妇女之间的关系,促进生理过程,仅在需要时使用干预措施。医护工作在资源充足和功能完善的卫生系统内进行协调,跨专业团队以尊重和信任的方式开展工作。这些护理模式是可修改的,适用于所有护理环境和相关环境。助产护理模式的原则包括(1)为所有妇女和新生儿提供公平和基于人权的护理,(2)在妇女和助产士之间的伙伴关系中以人为本和尊重的护理,(3)符合助产理念的高质量护理,(4)在整个卫生系统中由自主的、受过教育的、受监管的助产士提供护理,以及(5)助产士融入跨专业护理团队世卫组织认为,通过使用包含这些原则的模式,向助产模式过渡可以挽救生命,改善妇女和新生儿的健康结果,提高对护理的满意度,减少卫生不公平现象,促进妇女权利,并最大限度地利用卫生保健资源。在阐述助产护理模式时,世卫组织报告综合了最近的研究和其他报告,这些报告举例说明了向助产护理模式过渡的价值。大多数孕产妇和新生儿死亡和死产是可以预防的。妇女和新生儿的短期和长期结果将得到改善。助产士提供了更积极的体验,提供了妇女想要的东西,并对护理产生了更大的满意度助产士在整个社会中发挥的重要作用通过联合国教育,科学和文化组织(UNESCO)人类非物质文化遗产代表名单上的“助产:知识,技能和实践”得到了证明。1,2世界卫生组织报告中确定的助产护理原则与美国助产护理的定义和哲学声明一致。助产士是受过教育和规范的专业人员,在其执业范围内与患者自主合作最近扩大了美国助产主导护理的定义,包括助产士领导的护理,助产士和护理对象之间的伙伴关系,以及与助产哲学一致的护理助产士尊重基本人权,相信所有人都能获得高质量的护理,患者参与并对其保健作出最终决定,患者和助产士之间建立伙伴关系,促进生理护理和跨专业护理。5 .支持世卫组织关于助产护理模式立场的大多数研究都是在高收入国家进行的。然而,尽管美国在医疗保健方面的支出高于其他高收入国家,但有记录显示,美国的围产期健康状况较差此外,与白人相比,有充分记录的美国围产期健康不平等导致黑人和土著人的结果更差。7 2024年3月的报告卡强调了美国早产率缺乏变化,婴儿死亡率最近有所上升,以及全国各地的健康不平等。 KFF和March of Dimes最近的美国报告确定了解决不平等和不良结果的努力,明确了改善美国围产期护理模式的必要性,并强调助产士是解决方案的一部分。7,8世卫组织关于向助产护理模式过渡的建议如何在美国使用?助产士个人和助产实践领导者可以使用该文件和相关资源来敦促他们自己的机构进行必要的改革,以确保助产士完全按照助产哲学和护理方法进行实践。该文件可以在州立法中使用,从限制到完全自主的实践立法,包括向认证助产士颁发执照的立法。助产教育课程可将世界卫生组织和相关文件纳入专业问题和政策课程。在联邦一级,这一建议应立即纳入由联邦医疗保险中心资助的产妇保健转型方案。9 .改善产妇保健结果的医疗补助服务在世卫组织完成其制定全球助产护理模式实施指南的工作之际,美国助产士可以推动这份文件,因为我们正在与我们的卫生保健合作伙伴合作,努力促进高质量的助产护理,以改善美国在全国助产管理委员会和联合妇幼保健委员会70周年及以后的围产期护理。
{"title":"World Health Organization Calls for Transition to Midwifery Models of Care to Improve Outcomes for Women and Newborns","authors":"Melissa D. Avery CNM, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13739","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jmwh.13739","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As we welcome 2025 and begin celebrating 70 years of the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) and the <i>Journal of Midwifery &amp; Women's Health (JMWH)</i>, a recent World Health Organization (WHO) report<span><sup>1</sup></span> should be in the hands of every practicing midwife. In the United States in particular, this position paper can help promote midwifery care models at the federal, state, local, and health system practice levels. WHO recommends a transition to midwifery care models worldwide, linked to a strategy of primary health care as part of attaining universal health coverage.</p><p>WHO urges moving from fragmented and risk-focused care approaches to midwifery models of care so that women and newborns receive “equitable, person-centred, respectful, integrated and high-quality care, provided and coordinated by midwives working within collaborative interdisciplinary teams”<span><sup>1</sup></span><sup>(p8)</sup> prior to pregnancy through the postpartum period. The report notes that while the terms <i>women</i> and <i>mothers</i> are used, the recommendations are inclusive of all individuals identifying as women and all persons who give birth. Although improvements have been made in maternal and neonatal outcomes globally, many challenges remain. Improvements are needed in both access to health care and the provision of high-quality care. In addition, inappropriate use of medical interventions is highlighted as a barrier to improving perinatal outcomes.</p><p>Midwifery models of care are defined as those consistent with midwifery philosophy and where the care is provided by autonomous midwives who are educated, licensed, and regulated. Midwives provide high-quality care that is person-centered, based on a relationship between the midwife and the woman, promotes physiologic processes, with interventions used only when needed. Care is coordinated within resourced and functional health systems where interprofessional teams function with respect and trust. These care models are modifiable to be used in all care settings and related contexts.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>Principles of midwifery models of care include (1) access to equitable and human rights–based care for all women and newborns, (2) person-centered and respectful care in a partnership between women and midwives, (3) high-quality care consistent with midwifery philosophy, (4) care provided by autonomous, educated, regulated midwives throughout health systems, and (5) midwives are integrated into interprofessional care teams.<span><sup>1</sup></span> By using models incorporating these principles, WHO believes a transition to midwifery models can save lives, improve women's and newborns' health outcomes, improve satisfaction with care, reduce health inequities, promote women's rights, and maximize the use of health care resources.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>In making the case for midwifery care models, the WHO report synthesizes recent research and other repo","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 1","pages":"11-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13739","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143019008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Self-Compassion and Psychosocial Well-Being After Traumatic Births: Caring for the Midwife 创伤性分娩后的自我同情和社会心理健康:照顾助产士。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13733
Yael Musseri Navon MSN, Chani Malakov MSN, Anna Woloski Wruble EdD, Wiessam Abu Ahmad PhD, Nurit Zusman PhD, Michal Liebergall Wischnitzer PhD

Introduction

Midwives report high rates of exposure to traumatic births that can negatively affect their psychosocial well-being. Self-compassion can be considered as a tool to promote psychosocial well-being. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of midwives’ exposure to traumatic births and explore midwives’ self-compassion and its correlation to their psychosocial well-being in relation to experiences of traumatic births.

Methods

In a cross-sectional correlational study, data were collected using an electronic questionnaire by way of social networks and the website of the Israel Midwives Association. Inclusion criteria were certified Israeli midwives working in a hospital delivery room and able to read and write Hebrew. The questionnaire was composed of 4 parts: a demographic section, a traumatic events in perinatal care list, a self-compassion scale–short form, and a psychosocial health and well-being tool (short form of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire).

Results

The most common traumatic event reported was death. Self-compassion and psychosocial health and well-being were found to be at a medium-high level (mean [SD], 40.66 [6.5]; 38.33 [13.03]), and correlated significantly (r = 0.339; P < .001). There was a significant interaction effect between low self-compassion (mean, ≤3.17) and exposure to traumatic birth in the last year on psychosocial well-being compared with those who were not exposed to traumatic birth in the last year (F2,103 = 3.25; P = .043). No significant effect was found in those women with medium (mean, 3.18-3.67) or high (mean, ≥3.68) self-compassion.

Discussion

Self-compassion is related to the psychosocial health and well-being of midwives exposed to traumatic birth. Self-compassion can be learned and should be considered for inclusion in midwives’ basic and continuing education.

导读:助产士报告说,创伤性分娩的发生率很高,这会对她们的社会心理健康产生负面影响。自我同情可以被视为促进社会心理健康的一种工具。本研究的目的是评估助产士接触创伤性分娩的普遍性,并探讨助产士的自我同情及其与创伤性分娩经验的社会心理健康的相关性。方法:采用横断面相关性研究,通过社交网络和以色列助产士协会网站进行电子问卷调查。纳入标准是在医院产房工作并能读写希伯来语的经过认证的以色列助产士。问卷由4部分组成:人口统计部分、围产期创伤性事件清单、自我同情量表(简短形式)和社会心理健康和福祉工具(哥本哈根社会心理问卷的简短形式)。结果:最常见的创伤性事件是死亡。自我同情和社会心理健康和幸福感处于中高水平(平均[SD], 40.66 [6.5];38.33[13.03]),相关性显著(r = 0.339;p2103 = 3.25;P = .043)。自我同情程度中等(平均3.18-3.67)或高度(平均≥3.68)的女性无显著影响。讨论:自我同情与助产士的心理健康和福祉有关。自我同情是可以学习的,应该考虑纳入助产士的基础和继续教育。
{"title":"Self-Compassion and Psychosocial Well-Being After Traumatic Births: Caring for the Midwife","authors":"Yael Musseri Navon MSN,&nbsp;Chani Malakov MSN,&nbsp;Anna Woloski Wruble EdD,&nbsp;Wiessam Abu Ahmad PhD,&nbsp;Nurit Zusman PhD,&nbsp;Michal Liebergall Wischnitzer PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13733","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jmwh.13733","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Midwives report high rates of exposure to traumatic births that can negatively affect their psychosocial well-being. Self-compassion can be considered as a tool to promote psychosocial well-being. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of midwives’ exposure to traumatic births and explore midwives’ self-compassion and its correlation to their psychosocial well-being in relation to experiences of traumatic births.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In a cross-sectional correlational study, data were collected using an electronic questionnaire by way of social networks and the website of the Israel Midwives Association. Inclusion criteria were certified Israeli midwives working in a hospital delivery room and able to read and write Hebrew. The questionnaire was composed of 4 parts: a demographic section, a traumatic events in perinatal care list, a self-compassion scale–short form, and a psychosocial health and well-being tool (short form of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The most common traumatic event reported was death. Self-compassion and psychosocial health and well-being were found to be at a medium-high level (mean [SD], 40.66 [6.5]; 38.33 [13.03]), and correlated significantly (<i>r</i> = 0.339; <i>P</i> &lt; .001). There was a significant interaction effect between low self-compassion (mean, ≤3.17) and exposure to traumatic birth in the last year on psychosocial well-being compared with those who were not exposed to traumatic birth in the last year (<i>F</i><sub>2,103</sub> = 3.25; <i>P</i> = .043). No significant effect was found in those women with medium (mean, 3.18-3.67) or high (mean, ≥3.68) self-compassion.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Self-compassion is related to the psychosocial health and well-being of midwives exposed to traumatic birth. Self-compassion can be learned and should be considered for inclusion in midwives’ basic and continuing education.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 3","pages":"396-403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13733","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143019003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
¿Qué es una partera?* 什么是助产士吗?*
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13731

Las parteras en los Estados Unidos (EE. UU.) proporcionan servicios de atención médica a individuos en todas las etapas de la vida. Colaboran con sus pacientes/clientes en la toma de decisiones importantes sobre su salud. Trabajan en conjunto con otros miembros del equipo de atención médica cuando es necesario. También pueden ser proveedoras de atención primaria.

Es importante aclarar que el término “partera” en Latinoamérica no corresponde a la profesión de partería que se practica en EE. UU. El tipo de educación, el proceso de acreditación para ejercer esta profesión, la percepción cultural, el respaldo legal, y la relación con otros profesionales de la salud y con los centros de salud que tienen las parteras en EE.UU son diferentes que en muchas otras partes del mundo. Las parteras en EE. UU. tienen un alcance profesional que es parecido al de los gineco-obstetras, aunque con diferencias importantes.

Las enfermeras parteras certificadas (CNM, por sus siglas en inglés) y parteras certificadas (CM, por sus siglas en inglés) se han educado en programas acreditados y han aprobado un examen de certificación nacional. Deben tener una licencia para practicar en el estado donde trabajan. Tanto las CNM como las CM atienden a sus pacientes en todos los tipos de centros de salud, incluyendo los hospitales, los centros de maternidad, clínicas o consultorios, y también en el hogar. Proporcionan atención general durante el embarazo (seguimiento prenatal) y durante el parto, atención de salud reproductiva y también cuidado primario. Pueden recetar la mayoría de los medicamentos. Tanto las CNM como las CM pueden cuidar a los recién nacidos durante los primeros 30 días de vida.

Las parteras certificadas profesionales (CPM, por sus siglas en inglés) pueden haber tenido capacitación como aprendices o pueden haberse graduado de un programa de educación acreditado. Han tomado un examen de certificación nacional diferente al que toman las CNM o las CM. Las CPM proveen cuidado durante el embarazo, el nacimiento y después del parto en entornos comunitarios, usualmente en centros de maternidad o en los hogares. También proveen cuidado de los recién nacidos. No pueden recetar la mayoría de los medicamentos. Tampoco trabajan en hospitales.

La mayoría de las parteras en EE. UU. son CNM y tienen licencia en los 50 estados. No todos los estados conceden licencia a las CM ó a las CPM.

Las parteras proveen atención durante el embarazo, el trabajo de parto, el nacimiento y el posparto. También atienden a bebés recién nacidos. Las CNM y las CM cuidan a aproximadamente 1 de cada 10 mujeres que dan a luz cada año en EE. UU. Además de ser expertas en salud reproductiva, las CNM y las CM proveen atención primaria de salud. Los cuidados que brindan incluyen exámenes físicos anuales, planificación familiar, cuidado durante la menopausia, detección y tratamiento de infecciones de transmisión sexual y otros problemas de salud. Las

这包括与您讨论在分娩过程中可能出现的疼痛类型,并告知您缓解这些疼痛的不同选择。如果你需要止痛药来缓解分娩的疼痛,你的助产士会帮助你获得分娩地点提供的药物。他们也知道其他帮助你应对疼痛的方法,比如改变姿势或泡在水浴中。*在本文中,我们使用助产士和女性代词来指代所有从事助产士工作的人。然而,我们想要认识到,虽然美国的大多数助产士是女性,但也有一些从事助产士工作的人是男性,或者不认为自己是女性或男性。本手册可复制作非商业用途,由医疗保健专业人员与患者分享,但不允许对手册进行修改。本手册中的信息和建议不能取代医疗保健。在你的医疗保健提供者那里了解你和你的健康的具体信息。
{"title":"¿Qué es una partera?*","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13731","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Las parteras en los Estados Unidos (EE. UU.) proporcionan servicios de atención médica a individuos en todas las etapas de la vida. Colaboran con sus pacientes/clientes en la toma de decisiones importantes sobre su salud. Trabajan en conjunto con otros miembros del equipo de atención médica cuando es necesario. También pueden ser proveedoras de atención primaria.</p><p>Es importante aclarar que el término “partera” en Latinoamérica no corresponde a la profesión de partería que se practica en EE. UU. El tipo de educación, el proceso de acreditación para ejercer esta profesión, la percepción cultural, el respaldo legal, y la relación con otros profesionales de la salud y con los centros de salud que tienen las parteras en EE.UU son diferentes que en muchas otras partes del mundo. Las parteras en EE. UU. tienen un alcance profesional que es parecido al de los gineco-obstetras, aunque con diferencias importantes.</p><p>Las <b>enfermeras parteras certificadas</b> (CNM, por sus siglas en inglés) y <b>parteras certificadas</b> (CM, por sus siglas en inglés) se han educado en programas acreditados y han aprobado un examen de certificación nacional. Deben tener una licencia para practicar en el estado donde trabajan. Tanto las CNM como las CM atienden a sus pacientes en todos los tipos de centros de salud, incluyendo los hospitales, los centros de maternidad, clínicas o consultorios, y también en el hogar. Proporcionan atención general durante el embarazo (seguimiento prenatal) y durante el parto, atención de salud reproductiva y también cuidado primario. Pueden recetar la mayoría de los medicamentos. Tanto las CNM como las CM pueden cuidar a los recién nacidos durante los primeros 30 días de vida.</p><p>Las <b>parteras certificadas profesionales</b> (CPM, por sus siglas en inglés) pueden haber tenido capacitación como aprendices o pueden haberse graduado de un programa de educación acreditado. Han tomado un examen de certificación nacional diferente al que toman las CNM o las CM. Las CPM proveen cuidado durante el embarazo, el nacimiento y después del parto en entornos comunitarios, usualmente en centros de maternidad o en los hogares. También proveen cuidado de los recién nacidos. No pueden recetar la mayoría de los medicamentos. Tampoco trabajan en hospitales.</p><p>La mayoría de las parteras en EE. UU. son CNM y tienen licencia en los 50 estados. No todos los estados conceden licencia a las CM ó a las CPM.</p><p>Las parteras proveen atención durante el embarazo, el trabajo de parto, el nacimiento y el posparto. También atienden a bebés recién nacidos. Las CNM y las CM cuidan a aproximadamente 1 de cada 10 mujeres que dan a luz cada año en EE. UU. Además de ser expertas en salud reproductiva, las CNM y las CM proveen atención primaria de salud. Los cuidados que brindan incluyen exámenes físicos anuales, planificación familiar, cuidado durante la menopausia, detección y tratamiento de infecciones de transmisión sexual y otros problemas de salud. Las ","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 1","pages":"187-188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13731","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research and Professional Literature to Inform Practice, January/February 2025 研究和专业文献为实践提供信息,2025年1 / 2月
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13734
Rebecca R. S. Clark CNM, PhD, MSN, RN
{"title":"Research and Professional Literature to Inform Practice, January/February 2025","authors":"Rebecca R. S. Clark CNM, PhD, MSN, RN","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13734","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13734","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 1","pages":"169-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13734","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143362992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Respectful Maternity Care in the United States: A Scoping Review of the Research and Birthing People's Experiences 在美国尊重产妇护理:一个范围审查的研究和分娩的人的经验。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13729
Morgan Richardson Cayama MPH, Cheryl A. Vamos PhD, MPH, Nicole L. Harris MA, Rachel G. Logan PhD, MPH, Allison Howard MLIS, Ellen M. Daley PhD, MPH

Introduction

Birthing people around the world experience mistreatment during labor and birth, contributing to adverse maternal health outcomes. The adoption of respectful maternity care (RMC) has been recommended to address this mistreatment and improve care quality. Most RMC and mistreatment research has been conducted internationally. The purpose of this scoping review was to (1) explore the extent of RMC research and (2) describe labor and birth experiences in the United States.

Methods

Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched for concepts relating to RMC and mistreatment. A total of 66 studies met review inclusion criteria. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. Data were extracted and categorized using the Bohren et al typology of mistreatment. Summary statistics and narrative summaries were used to describe study characteristics and birthing people's experiences.

Results

Most studies represented national or urban samples and Western or Northeastern US regions. Few were from the South, and only one represented rural participants specifically. Few studies represented the unique experiences of justice-involved birthing people, and none represented sexual and gender minorities or Indigenous people. Qualitative methods were predominant. The most common forms of mistreatment included (1) poor rapport between women and health care providers (88% of studies), (2) stigma and discrimination (79%), and (3) a failure to meet professional standards of care (73%).

Discussion

The extent of mistreatment in the United States highlights the need for robust programs and policies targeting provision of RMC. Additional research is needed to better understand the experiences of additional minority communities and those living rural areas and in the Southern United States.

导言:世界各地的分娩人员在分娩和分娩期间都遭受虐待,造成不利的孕产妇健康结果。建议采用尊重产妇护理(RMC)来解决这种虐待问题并提高护理质量。大多数RMC和虐待研究都是在国际上进行的。本综述的目的是(1)探索RMC研究的范围,(2)描述美国的劳动和分娩经历。方法:检索Embase、Scopus和CINAHL数据库,检索与RMC和虐待相关的概念。共有66项研究符合纳入标准。两位审稿人筛选了标题、摘要和全文文章。使用Bohren等人的虐待类型提取数据并进行分类。采用汇总统计和叙述总结的方法描述研究特点和分娩人的经历。结果:大多数研究代表了国家或城市样本以及美国西部或东北部地区。很少有来自南方的,只有一个是专门代表农村参与者的。很少有研究反映了与司法有关的生育人群的独特经历,也没有研究反映了性和性别少数群体或土著人。定性方法占主导地位。最常见的虐待形式包括(1)妇女与卫生保健提供者之间关系不融洽(88%的研究),(2)污名化和歧视(79%),以及(3)未能达到专业护理标准(73%)。讨论:美国虐待的程度突出了针对RMC提供的强有力的计划和政策的必要性。需要进行更多的研究,以更好地了解其他少数民族社区以及生活在农村地区和美国南部的少数民族社区的经历。
{"title":"Respectful Maternity Care in the United States: A Scoping Review of the Research and Birthing People's Experiences","authors":"Morgan Richardson Cayama MPH,&nbsp;Cheryl A. Vamos PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Nicole L. Harris MA,&nbsp;Rachel G. Logan PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Allison Howard MLIS,&nbsp;Ellen M. Daley PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13729","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jmwh.13729","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Birthing people around the world experience mistreatment during labor and birth, contributing to adverse maternal health outcomes. The adoption of respectful maternity care (RMC) has been recommended to address this mistreatment and improve care quality. Most RMC and mistreatment research has been conducted internationally. The purpose of this scoping review was to (1) explore the extent of RMC research and (2) describe labor and birth experiences in the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched for concepts relating to RMC and mistreatment. A total of 66 studies met review inclusion criteria. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. Data were extracted and categorized using the Bohren et al typology of mistreatment. Summary statistics and narrative summaries were used to describe study characteristics and birthing people's experiences.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Most studies represented national or urban samples and Western or Northeastern US regions. Few were from the South, and only one represented rural participants specifically. Few studies represented the unique experiences of justice-involved birthing people, and none represented sexual and gender minorities or Indigenous people. Qualitative methods were predominant. The most common forms of mistreatment included (1) poor rapport between women and health care providers (88% of studies), (2) stigma and discrimination (79%), and (3) a failure to meet professional standards of care (73%).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The extent of mistreatment in the United States highlights the need for robust programs and policies targeting provision of RMC. Additional research is needed to better understand the experiences of additional minority communities and those living rural areas and in the Southern United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 2","pages":"212-222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13729","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142985844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Financial Barriers to Expanded Birth Center Access in New Jersey: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis 财政障碍扩大生育中心访问在新泽西州:定性专题分析。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13732
Rebecca H. Ofrane DrPH, Slawa Rokicki PhD, Leslie Kantor PhD, Julie Blumenfeld CNM, DNP

Introduction

Birth centers are an underused care setting with potential to improve birth experience and satisfaction. Both hospital-based and freestanding birth centers operate with the midwifery model of care that focuses on safe, low-intervention physiologic birth experiences for healthy, low-risk pregnant people. However, financial barriers limit freestanding birth center sustainability and accessibility in New Jersey, especially for traditionally marginalized populations. This qualitative study explores the financial barriers faced by freestanding birth centers in order to expand access and choice for pregnant people in New Jersey.

Methods

Semistructured interviews were conducted with participants from 4 sectors: (1) birth center or health system, (2) policy-adjacent philanthropy or research, (3) state departments, and (4) health insurance. Coding and analysis followed a reflexive thematic analysis process, resulting in the identification of 4 financial barriers to birth center access.

Results

Facility Medicaid reimbursement rates are a primary barrier for birth centers, along with startup and operating costs and, more indirectly, low supply of midwives and low patient demand for birth center care.

Discussion

New Jersey is well-positioned to enact critical policies and programs that can improve out-of-hospital birth center access, based on the findings and recommendations from this research. Other states can follow suit in pursuit of solutions to improve maternal health access and equitable birth center sustainability.

导言:生育中心是一个未充分利用的护理环境,有潜力提高生育经验和满意度。以医院为基础的和独立的分娩中心都采用助产护理模式,重点是为健康、低风险的孕妇提供安全、低干预的生理分娩体验。然而,财政障碍限制了新泽西州独立生育中心的可持续性和可及性,特别是对于传统上被边缘化的人群。本定性研究探讨了独立生育中心所面临的财务障碍,以扩大新泽西州孕妇的访问和选择。方法:采用半结构化访谈的方法,对来自4个部门的参与者进行访谈:(1)生育中心或卫生系统,(2)与政策相关的慈善或研究,(3)国家部门,(4)医疗保险。编码和分析遵循反思性主题分析过程,从而确定了进入生育中心的4个财务障碍。结果:设施医疗补助报销率是生育中心的主要障碍,以及启动和运营成本,更间接的是助产士供应不足和患者对生育中心护理的低需求。讨论:基于本研究的发现和建议,新泽西州在制定关键政策和项目以改善院外分娩中心的使用方面处于有利地位。其他州也可以效仿,寻求解决办法,改善产妇保健机会和公平的生育中心可持续性。
{"title":"Financial Barriers to Expanded Birth Center Access in New Jersey: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis","authors":"Rebecca H. Ofrane DrPH,&nbsp;Slawa Rokicki PhD,&nbsp;Leslie Kantor PhD,&nbsp;Julie Blumenfeld CNM, DNP","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13732","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jmwh.13732","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Birth centers are an underused care setting with potential to improve birth experience and satisfaction. Both hospital-based and freestanding birth centers operate with the midwifery model of care that focuses on safe, low-intervention physiologic birth experiences for healthy, low-risk pregnant people. However, financial barriers limit freestanding birth center sustainability and accessibility in New Jersey, especially for traditionally marginalized populations. This qualitative study explores the financial barriers faced by freestanding birth centers in order to expand access and choice for pregnant people in New Jersey.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Semistructured interviews were conducted with participants from 4 sectors: (1) birth center or health system, (2) policy-adjacent philanthropy or research, (3) state departments, and (4) health insurance. Coding and analysis followed a reflexive thematic analysis process, resulting in the identification of 4 financial barriers to birth center access.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Facility Medicaid reimbursement rates are a primary barrier for birth centers, along with startup and operating costs and, more indirectly, low supply of midwives and low patient demand for birth center care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>New Jersey is well-positioned to enact critical policies and programs that can improve out-of-hospital birth center access, based on the findings and recommendations from this research. Other states can follow suit in pursuit of solutions to improve maternal health access and equitable birth center sustainability.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 3","pages":"494-501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13732","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142960778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proactive Management of Lactation in the Birth Hospital to Ensure Long-Term Milk Production and Sustainable Breastfeeding 分娩医院主动管理哺乳以确保长期产奶和可持续母乳喂养。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13726
Diane L. Spatz PhD, RN-BC, FAWHONN, Salomé Álvarez Rodríguez RM, BSc, MSc, Sarah Benjilany RM, IBCLC, MSc, Barbara Finderle RM, MSc, IBCLC, Aleyd von Gartzen RM, BSc, IBCLC, Ann Yates RN, RM, Jessica Brumley CNM, PhD

Individuals who are at risk of not achieving a full milk supply are often overlooked in scientific literature. There is available guidance to help establish an adequate milk supply for healthy individuals experiencing a physiologic labor and birth, and there are robust recommendations for the lactating parents of small, sick, and preterm newborns to ensure that these newborns can receive human milk. Missing from the literature are clinical practice guidelines that address the preexisting health, pregnancy, birth, or newborn-related risk factors for suboptimal lactation. This can include risk factors that impact secretory activation or newborns who may not attach and suckle effectively to provide the stimulation and removal necessary to reach full milk volume. Secretory activation can only occur after the birth of the newborn and the placenta, with milk volume being established during the first weeks of breastfeeding. Recognizing this gap, over the past 2 years, an international group of midwives led by a doctoral nurse scientist in lactation conducted an extensive literature review to identify the most significant risk factors that can disrupt normal physiologic lactation. Our group sought to establish proactive lactation management strategies to ensure long-term milk production. We developed an evidence-based perinatal operational breastfeeding plan alongside clinical pathways to guide health care professionals in assessment, care, and necessary education for families who present with risk. Our goal is for midwives and other health care professionals to integrate the perinatal operational breastfeeding plan into practice and use these pathways to ensure (1) timely and effective secretory activation, (2) building a milk supply as robust as feasible for personal situations and conditions, (3) more newborns receiving more human milk and (4) more families achieving their personal breastfeeding goals.

在科学文献中,那些有可能无法获得全乳供应的个体经常被忽视。现有的指导可以帮助经历生理性分娩和分娩的健康个体建立充足的乳汁供应,并且对哺乳的父母有强有力的建议,以确保这些新生儿可以接受人乳。文献中缺少临床实践指南,这些指南涉及先前存在的健康状况、妊娠、分娩或新生儿相关的次优泌乳风险因素。这可能包括影响分泌激活的风险因素,或新生儿可能无法有效地附着和哺乳,以提供达到满乳量所需的刺激和清除。分泌激活只能在新生儿和胎盘出生后发生,在母乳喂养的头几周建立奶量。认识到这一差距,在过去的2年里,一个由哺乳护理博士科学家领导的国际助产士小组进行了广泛的文献综述,以确定可能破坏正常生理性哺乳的最重要危险因素。我们的小组试图建立主动的哺乳管理策略,以确保长期的产奶量。我们制定了一个循证的围产期母乳喂养操作计划以及临床路径,以指导卫生保健专业人员对存在风险的家庭进行评估、护理和必要的教育。我们的目标是让助产士和其他卫生保健专业人员将围产期操作母乳喂养计划整合到实践中,并使用这些途径来确保(1)及时有效地激活分泌,(2)根据个人情况和条件建立尽可能强大的母乳供应,(3)更多的新生儿获得更多的母乳,(4)更多的家庭实现他们的个人母乳喂养目标。
{"title":"Proactive Management of Lactation in the Birth Hospital to Ensure Long-Term Milk Production and Sustainable Breastfeeding","authors":"Diane L. Spatz PhD, RN-BC, FAWHONN,&nbsp;Salomé Álvarez Rodríguez RM, BSc, MSc,&nbsp;Sarah Benjilany RM, IBCLC, MSc,&nbsp;Barbara Finderle RM, MSc, IBCLC,&nbsp;Aleyd von Gartzen RM, BSc, IBCLC,&nbsp;Ann Yates RN, RM,&nbsp;Jessica Brumley CNM, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13726","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jmwh.13726","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individuals who are at risk of not achieving a full milk supply are often overlooked in scientific literature. There is available guidance to help establish an adequate milk supply for healthy individuals experiencing a physiologic labor and birth, and there are robust recommendations for the lactating parents of small, sick, and preterm newborns to ensure that these newborns can receive human milk. Missing from the literature are clinical practice guidelines that address the preexisting health, pregnancy, birth, or newborn-related risk factors for suboptimal lactation. This can include risk factors that impact secretory activation or newborns who may not attach and suckle effectively to provide the stimulation and removal necessary to reach full milk volume. Secretory activation can only occur after the birth of the newborn and the placenta, with milk volume being established during the first weeks of breastfeeding. Recognizing this gap, over the past 2 years, an international group of midwives led by a doctoral nurse scientist in lactation conducted an extensive literature review to identify the most significant risk factors that can disrupt normal physiologic lactation. Our group sought to establish proactive lactation management strategies to ensure long-term milk production. We developed an evidence-based perinatal operational breastfeeding plan alongside clinical pathways to guide health care professionals in assessment, care, and necessary education for families who present with risk. Our goal is for midwives and other health care professionals to integrate the perinatal operational breastfeeding plan into practice and use these pathways to ensure (1) timely and effective secretory activation, (2) building a milk supply as robust as feasible for personal situations and conditions, (3) more newborns receiving more human milk and (4) more families achieving their personal breastfeeding goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 2","pages":"343-349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13726","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defining Midwifery-Led Care in the United States Using Concept Analysis 用概念分析定义美国助产士主导的护理。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13727
Katie Page CNM, MSN, Julia Phillippi CNM, PhD, Cathy L. Emeis CNM, PhD, Allison Cummins RM, PhD, Brie Thumm CNM, PhD, MBA

National health policy initiatives recommend increased integration of midwifery care in the United States to improve care quality and reduce maternal health disparities. However, the service models through which midwives provide midwifery care and produce quality outcomes are poorly understood. Midwifery-led care is a service model frequently associated with improved outcomes compared with other models. The service model has been infrequently or inconsistently studied in the Unites States and has been narrowly defined and applied to perinatal care. The purpose of this concept analysis was to evaluate the concept of midwifery-led care and expand the definition to guide midwifery practice, research, and health policy. The analysis followed Walker and Avant's methodology. Three attributes of midwifery-led care were identified: (1) midwife as the lead clinician; (2) person-midwife partnership; and (3) care embodies midwifery philosophy. Antecedents were (1) license to practice as a midwife; (2) a person needing or desiring sexual, reproductive, perinatal, or newborn care; (3) a person with low- or moderate-risk health status; (4) regulations and guidelines that support provision of midwifery care; and (5) reimbursement for services. Consequences of midwifery-led care included (1) improved maternal and neonatal outcomes, (2) patient satisfaction, and (3) reduced health care costs. The presented expanded definition of midwifery-led care is the first to use a systems level approach and explicitly center the person receiving care and the philosophical approach of midwifery care. Application of this definition is needed in theoretical and pragmatic research to classify midwifery-led care and other service models and compare patient- and organization-level outcomes.

国家卫生政策倡议建议加强美国助产护理的一体化,以提高护理质量,减少孕产妇保健差距。然而,人们对助产士提供助产护理并产生高质量结果的服务模式知之甚少。与其他模式相比,助产士主导的护理是一种经常与改善结果相关的服务模式。这种服务模式在美国很少或不一致地进行研究,并且被狭义地定义并应用于围产期护理。本概念分析的目的是评估助产主导护理的概念,并扩展其定义,以指导助产实践、研究和卫生政策。分析遵循了沃克和阿万特的方法。确定了助产士主导护理的三个属性:(1)助产士作为主要临床医生;(二)人产婆合伙;(3)护理体现了助产哲学。前因是(1)助产士执业执照;(二)需要或者希望得到性、生殖、围产期、新生儿护理的人;(三)健康状况为中低风险者;(4)支持提供助产护理的法规和指南;(5)服务报销。助产士主导的护理结果包括:(1)改善孕产妇和新生儿结局,(2)患者满意度,(3)降低医疗成本。提出的扩大定义助产领导的护理是第一个使用系统级的方法,并明确中心的人接受护理和助产护理的哲学方法。在理论和实践研究中需要应用这一定义来对助产主导的护理和其他服务模式进行分类,并比较患者和组织层面的结果。
{"title":"Defining Midwifery-Led Care in the United States Using Concept Analysis","authors":"Katie Page CNM, MSN,&nbsp;Julia Phillippi CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Cathy L. Emeis CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Allison Cummins RM, PhD,&nbsp;Brie Thumm CNM, PhD, MBA","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13727","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jmwh.13727","url":null,"abstract":"<p>National health policy initiatives recommend increased integration of midwifery care in the United States to improve care quality and reduce maternal health disparities. However, the service models through which midwives provide midwifery care and produce quality outcomes are poorly understood. Midwifery-led care is a service model frequently associated with improved outcomes compared with other models. The service model has been infrequently or inconsistently studied in the Unites States and has been narrowly defined and applied to perinatal care. The purpose of this concept analysis was to evaluate the concept of midwifery-led care and expand the definition to guide midwifery practice, research, and health policy. The analysis followed Walker and Avant's methodology. Three attributes of midwifery-led care were identified: (1) midwife as the lead clinician; (2) person-midwife partnership; and (3) care embodies midwifery philosophy. Antecedents were (1) license to practice as a midwife; (2) a person needing or desiring sexual, reproductive, perinatal, or newborn care; (3) a person with low- or moderate-risk health status; (4) regulations and guidelines that support provision of midwifery care; and (5) reimbursement for services. Consequences of midwifery-led care included (1) improved maternal and neonatal outcomes, (2) patient satisfaction, and (3) reduced health care costs. The presented expanded definition of midwifery-led care is the first to use a systems level approach and explicitly center the person receiving care and the philosophical approach of midwifery care. Application of this definition is needed in theoretical and pragmatic research to classify midwifery-led care and other service models and compare patient- and organization-level outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 2","pages":"223-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13727","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142901476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceptions of Coping With Breastfeeding Pain: A Secondary Analysis 应对母乳喂养疼痛的看法:二次分析。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13723
Megan Russell BSN, RN, Ruth Lucas PhD, RNC, CLS, Katherine Bernier Carney PhD, RN

Introduction

Although there are many known benefits of providing human milk to infants, breastfeeding-related pain is a significant reason for breastfeeding cessation. Breastfeeding-related pain is a unique experience due to breastfeeding's goal-directed purpose, repetitive nature, and socio-emotional reflections of successful parenting. Understanding how lactating parents cope with breastfeeding-related pain will inform clinical practice to encourage individuals to meet their lactation goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate how lactating parents view coping with breastfeeding-related pain to be different from coping with other types of pain.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of a pilot randomized control study of a breastfeeding pain self-management intervention. Data from 57 participants who breastfed and completed self-report surveys at 1, 2, and 6 weeks postpartum were included. We employed Boyatzis’ thematic analysis method to evaluate affirmative responses to “Is coping with breastfeeding pain different than coping with other pain?” We evaluated correlations between responses to coping with breastfeeding pain and pain severity scores.

Results

We identified 3 main themes: (1) uncharted waters, (2) light at the end of the tunnel, and (3) parental role and responsibility. No significant differences were detected between the pain scores of individuals who viewed coping with breastfeeding to be different and those who did not.

Discussion

Lactating parents reported an array of psychological coping strategies in response to breastfeeding-related pain. Coping processes were influenced by personal goals, parental role evaluations, and a desire to meet their infant's needs. Interventions during prenatal and postpartum care that incorporate individualized coping strategies could support breastfeeding goal attainment.

导读:虽然母乳喂养对婴儿有许多已知的好处,但与母乳喂养有关的疼痛是停止母乳喂养的一个重要原因。母乳喂养相关的疼痛是一种独特的经历,这是由于母乳喂养的目标导向的目的、重复的性质以及成功育儿的社会情感反映。了解哺乳期父母如何应对与母乳喂养有关的疼痛将为临床实践提供信息,以鼓励个人实现他们的哺乳目标。本研究的目的是评估哺乳期父母如何看待应对母乳喂养相关的疼痛与应对其他类型的疼痛不同。方法:我们对一项母乳喂养疼痛自我管理干预的试点随机对照研究进行了二次分析。数据来自57名母乳喂养的参与者,并在产后1、2和6周完成了自我报告调查。我们采用Boyatzis的主题分析方法来评估“应对母乳喂养疼痛与应对其他疼痛不同吗?”我们评估了应对母乳喂养疼痛的反应与疼痛严重程度评分之间的相关性。结果:我们确定了三个主要主题:(1)未知的水域,(2)隧道尽头的光明,(3)父母的角色和责任。在那些认为应对母乳喂养不同的人和那些认为应对母乳喂养不同的人之间,没有发现明显的差异。讨论:哺乳期父母报告了一系列心理应对策略,以应对母乳喂养相关的疼痛。应对过程受个人目标、父母角色评价和满足婴儿需求的愿望的影响。产前和产后护理期间的干预措施,包括个性化的应对策略,可以支持母乳喂养目标的实现。
{"title":"Perceptions of Coping With Breastfeeding Pain: A Secondary Analysis","authors":"Megan Russell BSN, RN,&nbsp;Ruth Lucas PhD, RNC, CLS,&nbsp;Katherine Bernier Carney PhD, RN","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13723","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jmwh.13723","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although there are many known benefits of providing human milk to infants, breastfeeding-related pain is a significant reason for breastfeeding cessation. Breastfeeding-related pain is a unique experience due to breastfeeding's goal-directed purpose, repetitive nature, and socio-emotional reflections of successful parenting. Understanding how lactating parents cope with breastfeeding-related pain will inform clinical practice to encourage individuals to meet their lactation goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate how lactating parents view coping with breastfeeding-related pain to be different from coping with other types of pain.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a secondary analysis of a pilot randomized control study of a breastfeeding pain self-management intervention. Data from 57 participants who breastfed and completed self-report surveys at 1, 2, and 6 weeks postpartum were included. We employed Boyatzis’ thematic analysis method to evaluate affirmative responses to “Is coping with breastfeeding pain different than coping with other pain?” We evaluated correlations between responses to coping with breastfeeding pain and pain severity scores.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We identified 3 main themes: (1) uncharted waters, (2) light at the end of the tunnel, and (3) parental role and responsibility. No significant differences were detected between the pain scores of individuals who viewed coping with breastfeeding to be different and those who did not.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Lactating parents reported an array of psychological coping strategies in response to breastfeeding-related pain. Coping processes were influenced by personal goals, parental role evaluations, and a desire to meet their infant's needs. Interventions during prenatal and postpartum care that incorporate individualized coping strategies could support breastfeeding goal attainment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 2","pages":"315-324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13723","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142848705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of midwifery & women's health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1