Lucinda Canty CNM, PhD, Ira Kantrowitz-Gordon CNM, PhD
<p>Midwifery, and by extension, midwifery research, exists within a complex social and political context. The ideation, construction, conduct, and presentation of midwifery scholarship are embedded in these structures, as well as the researchers and research participants who contribute, in varying ways, to the construction of the work. Positionality is understanding one's social identities and how these identities influence our interactions with others. Reflexivity can include examination of one's assumptions, biases, and blind spots.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Seeing things from multiple perspectives expands knowledge beyond the researcher's lived experience. Positionality and reflexivity are important in both qualitative and quantitative research.</p><p>Midwifery is built on the foundation of having the knowledge to address issues such as social determinants of health, racism, and other sources of inequity. Health care practitioners are increasingly aware of the societal structures that exist in our health care system and that influence health outcomes. Similarly, researchers need to be aware of the structures that exist within the research context to address health equity.</p><p>Our experiences shape who we are. Messages received since childhood shape our perception and understanding of the world. When generating knowledge to inform midwifery practice and education, it is important that we stay true to the realities of those we care for. The research findings should reflect their perceptions to inform how we understand the challenges and circumstances, and not be limited by our own perspectives.</p><p>Systems of power and oppression are built into the systems within which research is conducted. Underlying assumptions about value and importance that determine what is being studied (ie, what health conditions), who is being studied (what populations), and how it is studied (what methods) are determined by those who hold the most power (researchers, funders, authors, journals, and editors). These systems can be challenged only if we are aware and acknowledge that they exist. These include not just racism, but sexism, classism, and other forms of marginalization that can intersect within individuals. These oppressive structures are embedded so deep in our society that, as researchers, we may unknowingly become a part of these systemic issues and cause unintentional harm throughout the research process.</p><p>Qualitative research often involves direct contact between researchers and participants in dynamic data collection in the form of interviews. The researcher is the instrument of data collection when there is an interview. Similarly, the researcher is intricately part of the analysis and interpretation of findings. Interviews can be impacted by the lenses that interviewers and participants bring to the interaction from their social identities, past experiences with the topic of interest, and level of trust that the participant has in the research
{"title":"Understanding Positionality and Reflexivity in Scholarly Writing","authors":"Lucinda Canty CNM, PhD, Ira Kantrowitz-Gordon CNM, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13675","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jmwh.13675","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Midwifery, and by extension, midwifery research, exists within a complex social and political context. The ideation, construction, conduct, and presentation of midwifery scholarship are embedded in these structures, as well as the researchers and research participants who contribute, in varying ways, to the construction of the work. Positionality is understanding one's social identities and how these identities influence our interactions with others. Reflexivity can include examination of one's assumptions, biases, and blind spots.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Seeing things from multiple perspectives expands knowledge beyond the researcher's lived experience. Positionality and reflexivity are important in both qualitative and quantitative research.</p><p>Midwifery is built on the foundation of having the knowledge to address issues such as social determinants of health, racism, and other sources of inequity. Health care practitioners are increasingly aware of the societal structures that exist in our health care system and that influence health outcomes. Similarly, researchers need to be aware of the structures that exist within the research context to address health equity.</p><p>Our experiences shape who we are. Messages received since childhood shape our perception and understanding of the world. When generating knowledge to inform midwifery practice and education, it is important that we stay true to the realities of those we care for. The research findings should reflect their perceptions to inform how we understand the challenges and circumstances, and not be limited by our own perspectives.</p><p>Systems of power and oppression are built into the systems within which research is conducted. Underlying assumptions about value and importance that determine what is being studied (ie, what health conditions), who is being studied (what populations), and how it is studied (what methods) are determined by those who hold the most power (researchers, funders, authors, journals, and editors). These systems can be challenged only if we are aware and acknowledge that they exist. These include not just racism, but sexism, classism, and other forms of marginalization that can intersect within individuals. These oppressive structures are embedded so deep in our society that, as researchers, we may unknowingly become a part of these systemic issues and cause unintentional harm throughout the research process.</p><p>Qualitative research often involves direct contact between researchers and participants in dynamic data collection in the form of interviews. The researcher is the instrument of data collection when there is an interview. Similarly, the researcher is intricately part of the analysis and interpretation of findings. Interviews can be impacted by the lenses that interviewers and participants bring to the interaction from their social identities, past experiences with the topic of interest, and level of trust that the participant has in the research","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"69 4","pages":"453-454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13675","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}