Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology最新文献

Background: Optic disc drusen (ODD) represent an important differential diagnosis of papilledema caused by intracranial hypertension, but their distinction may be difficult in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to train, validate, and test a dedicated deep learning system (DLS) for binary classification of ODD vs papilledema (including various subgroups within each category), on conventional mydriatic digital ocular fundus photographs collected in a large international multiethnic population.

Methods: This retrospective study included 4,508 color fundus images in 2,180 patients from 30 neuro-ophthalmology centers (19 countries) participating in the Brain and Optic Nerve Study with Artificial Intelligence (BONSAI) Group. For training and internal validation, we used 857 ODD images and 3,230 papilledema images, in 1,959 patients. External testing was performed on an independent data set (221 patients), including 207 images with ODD (96 visible and 111 buried), provided by 3 centers of the Optic Disc Drusen Studies Consortium, and 214 images of papilledema (92 mild-to-moderate and 122 severe) from a previously validated study.

Results: The DLS could accurately distinguish between all ODD and papilledema (all severities included): area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-0.98), accuracy 90.5% (95% CI, 88.0%-92.9%), sensitivity 86.0% (95% CI, 82.1%-90.1%), and specificity 94.9% (95% CI, 92.3%-97.6%). The performance of the DLS remained high for discrimination of buried ODD from mild-to-moderate papilledema: AUC 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96), accuracy 84.2% (95% CI, 80.2%-88.6%), sensitivity 78.4% (95% CI, 72.2%-84.7%), and specificity 91.3% (95% CI, 87.0%-96.4%).

Conclusions: A dedicated DLS can accurately distinguish between ODD and papilledema caused by intracranial hypertension, even when considering buried ODD vs mild-to-moderate papilledema.

Background: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment for patients with motor symptoms of Parkinson disease but can be complicated by disabling blepharospasm and apraxia of eyelid opening (ALO). Currently, there is no clear consensus on optimal management, and addressing these issues is further hindered by systemic morbidity and resistance to treatments. We aim to describe the different phenotypes of these eyelid movement disorders, to report our management approach and patient responses to treatment.

Methods: A retrospective case series of all patients with blepharospasm/ALO secondary to STN-DBS that were treated at a tertiary center between 2011 and 2020. Data collected included date of Parkinson diagnosis, date of DBS surgery, date of development of blepharospasm/ALO symptoms, STN-DBS stimulation settings, and treatment given. Patients' symptoms before and after treatment were measured using the blepharospasm disability index and Jankovic Rating Scale.

Results: Five patients were identified with eyelid movement disorders secondary to STN-DBS. All patients had moderate-to-severe symptoms at presentation. Four patients received periocular botulinum toxin injections. Three patients underwent surgery in the form of frontalis suspension or direct brow lift with or without upper lid blepharoplasty. All reported an improvement in symptoms following treatment.

Conclusions: A multimodality, patient-specific approach is required in the treatment of blepharospasm/ALO secondary to STN-DBS. Botulinum toxin injections can be effective, but patients may require surgery if toxin treatment alone becomes ineffective. Tailoring treatment to individual needs can result in a measurable improvement in symptoms.