Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology最新文献

Background: Behcet disease is a systemic vasculitis, which may involve the eyes and central nervous system. The true prevalence of neurological involvement is not precisely known but may be associated with ocular involvement. This study investigates the association between Behcet uveitis and neuro-Behcet disease.

Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted for consecutive patients with Behcet uveitis at the Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution. Uveitis characteristics, neurological symptoms, fluorescein fundus angiography, and MRI results were recorded.

Results: Our population included 108 patients with Behcet uveitis, and 26 (24.1%) were found to have neurological involvement associated with Behcet disease. Optic nerve leakage on fundus angiography and neurological symptoms were associated with an increased risk of neurological involvement. Three cases (11.5%) were nonparenchymal, while 23 (88.5%) were parenchymal with lesions in the cortex, subcortical white matter, thalamus, basal ganglia, and brainstem.

Conclusions: There is a high comorbidity between ocular and neurological involvement in Behcet disease. Careful assessment of neurological symptoms and baseline fluorescein fundus angiography are recommended for patients with Behcet disease. MRI has a high diagnostic yield and should be pursued if there is concern for progressive or pre-existing neurological involvement.

Background: Increasing incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), overreported radiologic signs of intracranial hypertension, difficult access to outpatient neuro-ophthalmology services, poor insurance coverage, and medicolegal concerns have lowered the threshold for emergency department (ED) visits for "papilledema." Our objective was to examine referral patterns and outcomes of neuro-ophthalmology ED and inpatient consultations for concern for papilledema.

Methods: At one university-based quaternary care center, all adults referred for "papilledema" over one year underwent a standardized ED "papilledema protocol." We collected patient demographics, final diagnoses, and referral patterns.

Results: Over 1 year, 153 consecutive patients were referred for concern for papilledema. After papilledema protocol, 89 of 153 patients (58%) had bilateral optic disc edema, among whom 89% (79/89) had papilledema (intracranial hypertension). Of the 38 of 153 (25%) consultations for suspected disorder of intracranial pressure without previous fundus examination (Group 1), 74% (28/38) did not have optic disc edema, 21% (8/38) had papilledema, and 5% (2/38) had other causes of bilateral disc edema. Of the 89 of 153 (58%) consultations for presumed papilledema seen on fundus examination (Group 2), 58% (66/89) had confirmed papilledema, 17% (15/89) had pseudopapilledema, and 9% (8/89) had other causes of bilateral optic disc edema. Of the 26 of 153 (17%) patients with known IIH (Group 3), 5 had papilledema and 4 required urgent intervention. The most common diagnosis was IIH (58/79). Compared with IIH, patients with secondary causes of intracranial hypertension were older ( P = 0.002), men ( P < 0.001), not obese ( P < 0.001), and more likely to have neurologic symptoms ( P = 0.002).

Conclusions: Inpatient and ED consultations for "papilledema" are increasing. Of the 153 ED and inpatient neuro-ophthalmology consultations seen for "papilledema" over 1 year, one-third of patients with optic disc edema of unknown cause before presentation to our ED had new vision- or life-threatening disease, supporting the need for prompt identification and evaluation of optic disc edema in the ED. In the face of limited access to neuro-ophthalmologists, this study supports the need for emergency department access to expert eye-care evaluation or ocular fundus camera for prompt identification of optic disc edema and standardized evaluation for neurologic emergencies.