Lars H. Lund, Stefan James, Adam D. DeVore, Kevin J. Anstrom, Marat Fudim, Keith D. Aaronson, Ulf Dahlström, Patrice Desvigne-Nickens, Jerome L. Fleg, Song Yang, Michael Fu, Camilla Hage, Claes Held, Patric Karlström, Magnus Nygren, Eric D. Peterson, Tymon Pol, Shelly Sapp, Johan Sundström, Ollie Östlund, Jonas Oldgren, Bertram Pitt
Benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF/HFmrEF) have not been established. Conventional randomized controlled trials are complex and expensive. The Spironolactone Initiation Registry Randomized Interventional Trial in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (SPIRRIT-HFpEF) is a unique pragmatic registry-based randomized controlled trial.
{"title":"The Spironolactone Initiation Registry Randomized Interventional Trial in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (SPIRRIT-HFpEF): Rationale and design","authors":"Lars H. Lund, Stefan James, Adam D. DeVore, Kevin J. Anstrom, Marat Fudim, Keith D. Aaronson, Ulf Dahlström, Patrice Desvigne-Nickens, Jerome L. Fleg, Song Yang, Michael Fu, Camilla Hage, Claes Held, Patric Karlström, Magnus Nygren, Eric D. Peterson, Tymon Pol, Shelly Sapp, Johan Sundström, Ollie Östlund, Jonas Oldgren, Bertram Pitt","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3453","url":null,"abstract":"Benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF/HFmrEF) have not been established. Conventional randomized controlled trials are complex and expensive. The Spironolactone Initiation Registry Randomized Interventional Trial in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (SPIRRIT-HFpEF) is a unique pragmatic registry-based randomized controlled trial.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142235336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Che‐Yuan Wu, Baiju R. Shah, Abhinav Sharma, Yiru Sheng, Peter P. Liu, Alexander Kopp, Refik Saskin, Jodi D. Edwards, Walter Swardfager
AimsResults from randomized trials suggest benefit of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor initiation in clinically stable acute heart failure. We aim to examine the real‐world effectiveness of early versus delayed post‐discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation in people with acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.Methods and resultsUsing linkable administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, individuals aged 66 years or older with type 2 diabetes who were discharged to the community from acute care hospitals for heart failure between 1 July 2016 and 31 March 2020 were included in this retrospective, population‐based cohort study. The primary outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or cardiovascular mortality as a composite. Follow‐up started from discharge for maximum 1 year. We compared outcomes between post‐discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation within 3 days, 4–90 days, or 91–180 days, versus delayed initiation for at least 180 days. The ‘clone‐censor‐weight’ approach with a target trial emulation framework was used to address time‐related biases. There were 9641 eligible individuals. After cloning and artificial censoring, there were 38 564 clones, 12 439 person‐years, and 7584 events. Compared to delayed initiation for at least 180 days, initiation within 3 days post‐discharge was associated with a lower 1‐year risk of HHF or cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–0.83), while initiation 4–90 days (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.93) or 91–180 days (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79–0.97) showed smaller risk reduction.ConclusionReal‐world evidence supports early SGLT2 inhibitor initiation to reduce HHF or cardiovascular mortality in acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.
{"title":"Timing of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor initiation and post‐discharge outcomes in acute heart failure with diabetes: A population‐based cohort study","authors":"Che‐Yuan Wu, Baiju R. Shah, Abhinav Sharma, Yiru Sheng, Peter P. Liu, Alexander Kopp, Refik Saskin, Jodi D. Edwards, Walter Swardfager","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3464","url":null,"abstract":"AimsResults from randomized trials suggest benefit of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor initiation in clinically stable acute heart failure. We aim to examine the real‐world effectiveness of early versus delayed post‐discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation in people with acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.Methods and resultsUsing linkable administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, individuals aged 66 years or older with type 2 diabetes who were discharged to the community from acute care hospitals for heart failure between 1 July 2016 and 31 March 2020 were included in this retrospective, population‐based cohort study. The primary outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or cardiovascular mortality as a composite. Follow‐up started from discharge for maximum 1 year. We compared outcomes between post‐discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation within 3 days, 4–90 days, or 91–180 days, versus delayed initiation for at least 180 days. The ‘clone‐censor‐weight’ approach with a target trial emulation framework was used to address time‐related biases. There were 9641 eligible individuals. After cloning and artificial censoring, there were 38 564 clones, 12 439 person‐years, and 7584 events. Compared to delayed initiation for at least 180 days, initiation within 3 days post‐discharge was associated with a lower 1‐year risk of HHF or cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–0.83), while initiation 4–90 days (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.93) or 91–180 days (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79–0.97) showed smaller risk reduction.ConclusionReal‐world evidence supports early SGLT2 inhibitor initiation to reduce HHF or cardiovascular mortality in acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142231343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lars H Lund,Maria Generosa Crespo-Leiro,Cécile Laroche,Diana Zaliaduonyte,Aly M Saad,Candida Fonseca,Jelena Čelutkienė,Marija Zdravkovic,Agata M Bielecka-Dabrowa,Piergiuseppe Agostoni,Robert G Xuereb,Kseniya V Neronova,Malgorzata Lelonek,Yuksel Cavusoglu,Barnabas Gellen,Magdy Abdelhamid,Naima Hammoudi,Stefan D Anker,Ovidiu Chioncel,Gerasimos Filippatos,Mitja Lainscak,Theresa A McDonagh,Alexandre Mebazaa,Massimo Piepoli,Frank Ruschitzka,Petar M Seferović,Gianluigi Savarese,Marco Metra,Giuseppe M C Rosano,Aldo P Maggioni,
AIMSWe analysed baseline characteristics and guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use and decisions in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Heart Failure (HF) III Registry.METHODS AND RESULTSBetween 1 November 2018 and 31 December 2020, 10 162 patients with acute HF (AHF, 39%, age 70 [62-79], 36% women) or outpatient visit for HF (61%, age 66 [58-75], 33% women), with HF with reduced (HFrEF, 57%), mildly reduced (HFmrEF, 17%) or preserved (HFpEF, 26%) ejection fraction were enrolled from 220 centres in 41 European or ESC-affiliated countries. With AHF, 97% were hospitalized, 2.2% received intravenous treatment in the emergency department, and 0.9% received intravenous treatment in an outpatient clinic. AHF was seen by most by a general cardiologist (51%) and outpatient HF most by a HF specialist (48%). A majority had been hospitalized for HF before, but 26% of AHF and 6.1% of outpatient HF had de novo HF. Baseline use, initiation and discontinuation of GDMT varied according to AHF versus outpatient HF, de novo versus pre-existing HF, and by ejection fraction. After the AHF event or outpatient HF visit, use of any renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and loop diuretics was 89%, 29%, 92%, 78%, and 85% in HFrEF; 89%, 9.7%, 90%, 64%, and 81% in HFmrEF; and 77%, 3.1%, 80%, 48%, and 80% in HFpEF.CONCLUSIONUse and initiation of GDMT was high in cardiology centres in Europe, compared to previous reports from cohorts and registries including more primary care and general medicine and regions more local or outside of Europe and ESC-affiliated countries.
{"title":"Heart failure in Europe: Guideline-directed medical therapy use and decision making in chronic and acute, pre-existing and de novo, heart failure with reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fraction - the ESC EORP Heart Failure III Registry.","authors":"Lars H Lund,Maria Generosa Crespo-Leiro,Cécile Laroche,Diana Zaliaduonyte,Aly M Saad,Candida Fonseca,Jelena Čelutkienė,Marija Zdravkovic,Agata M Bielecka-Dabrowa,Piergiuseppe Agostoni,Robert G Xuereb,Kseniya V Neronova,Malgorzata Lelonek,Yuksel Cavusoglu,Barnabas Gellen,Magdy Abdelhamid,Naima Hammoudi,Stefan D Anker,Ovidiu Chioncel,Gerasimos Filippatos,Mitja Lainscak,Theresa A McDonagh,Alexandre Mebazaa,Massimo Piepoli,Frank Ruschitzka,Petar M Seferović,Gianluigi Savarese,Marco Metra,Giuseppe M C Rosano,Aldo P Maggioni,","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3445","url":null,"abstract":"AIMSWe analysed baseline characteristics and guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use and decisions in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Heart Failure (HF) III Registry.METHODS AND RESULTSBetween 1 November 2018 and 31 December 2020, 10 162 patients with acute HF (AHF, 39%, age 70 [62-79], 36% women) or outpatient visit for HF (61%, age 66 [58-75], 33% women), with HF with reduced (HFrEF, 57%), mildly reduced (HFmrEF, 17%) or preserved (HFpEF, 26%) ejection fraction were enrolled from 220 centres in 41 European or ESC-affiliated countries. With AHF, 97% were hospitalized, 2.2% received intravenous treatment in the emergency department, and 0.9% received intravenous treatment in an outpatient clinic. AHF was seen by most by a general cardiologist (51%) and outpatient HF most by a HF specialist (48%). A majority had been hospitalized for HF before, but 26% of AHF and 6.1% of outpatient HF had de novo HF. Baseline use, initiation and discontinuation of GDMT varied according to AHF versus outpatient HF, de novo versus pre-existing HF, and by ejection fraction. After the AHF event or outpatient HF visit, use of any renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and loop diuretics was 89%, 29%, 92%, 78%, and 85% in HFrEF; 89%, 9.7%, 90%, 64%, and 81% in HFmrEF; and 77%, 3.1%, 80%, 48%, and 80% in HFpEF.CONCLUSIONUse and initiation of GDMT was high in cardiology centres in Europe, compared to previous reports from cohorts and registries including more primary care and general medicine and regions more local or outside of Europe and ESC-affiliated countries.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142170559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The persistent poor prognosis in cardiogenic shock: Insights from recent trials.","authors":"Ameesh Isath,Mandeep R Mehra","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3462","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3462","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142165909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AIMSAngiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) has played an increasingly important role in the management of heart failure (HF). However, the evidence on the benefits of ARNI in HF patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis is limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ARNI in patients with concomitant HF and ESKD on maintenance dialysis.METHODS AND RESULTSWe systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies reporting outcomes after ARNI treatment in HF patients with ESKD on dialysis. All meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model. Twenty-six studies comprising 2494 patients with concomitant HF and ESKD undergoing dialysis were included. Our synthesis showed a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between before and after ARNI treatment (mean change: 8.05%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.57-10.54). Compared to the conventional group, the ARNI group showed a greater improvement in LVEF (mean difference: 4.03%; 95% CI 2.90-5.16). This effect was more pronounced in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (pinteraction < 0.0001). Patients treated with ARNI had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.92; p = 0.01) but had a similar rate of HF hospitalization (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.43-1.18; p = 0.19). ARNI treatment showed benefits in the improvement of left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular mass index, left atrial diameter, and E/e' ratio (p < 0.05), while it did not significantly increase the risk of severe hyperkalaemia (p = 0.33) or symptomatic hypotension (p = 0.53).CONCLUSIONThis meta-analysis provided insights into the benefits of ARNI in HF patients with ESKD undergoing dialysis by improving left ventricular function, reversing left ventricular remodelling, and reducing the risk of all-cause mortality, without increasing the risk of HF hospitalizations, severe hyperkalaemia, and symptomatic hypotension.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure patients with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Dung Viet Nguyen,Thanh Ngoc Le,Binh Quang Truong,Hoai Thi Thu Nguyen","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3454","url":null,"abstract":"AIMSAngiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) has played an increasingly important role in the management of heart failure (HF). However, the evidence on the benefits of ARNI in HF patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis is limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ARNI in patients with concomitant HF and ESKD on maintenance dialysis.METHODS AND RESULTSWe systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies reporting outcomes after ARNI treatment in HF patients with ESKD on dialysis. All meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model. Twenty-six studies comprising 2494 patients with concomitant HF and ESKD undergoing dialysis were included. Our synthesis showed a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between before and after ARNI treatment (mean change: 8.05%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.57-10.54). Compared to the conventional group, the ARNI group showed a greater improvement in LVEF (mean difference: 4.03%; 95% CI 2.90-5.16). This effect was more pronounced in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (pinteraction < 0.0001). Patients treated with ARNI had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.92; p = 0.01) but had a similar rate of HF hospitalization (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.43-1.18; p = 0.19). ARNI treatment showed benefits in the improvement of left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular mass index, left atrial diameter, and E/e' ratio (p < 0.05), while it did not significantly increase the risk of severe hyperkalaemia (p = 0.33) or symptomatic hypotension (p = 0.53).CONCLUSIONThis meta-analysis provided insights into the benefits of ARNI in HF patients with ESKD undergoing dialysis by improving left ventricular function, reversing left ventricular remodelling, and reducing the risk of all-cause mortality, without increasing the risk of HF hospitalizations, severe hyperkalaemia, and symptomatic hypotension.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142165905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Giovanni Battista Bonfioli, Daniela Tomasoni, Giuseppe Vergaro, Vincenzo Castiglione, Marianna Adamo, Iacopo Fabiani, Victor Loghin, Carlo Mario Lombardi, Alessio Nicolai, Marco Metra, Michele Emdin, Alberto Aimo
Several scores were developed to help the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA). The most recent one, being the Mayo transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) score, was not externally validated. We compared the diagnostic performance of the ATTR-CM score with previous tools (increased wall thickness [IWT] score, AMYLoidosis Index [AMYLI] score, and cardiac biomarkers) in a cohort of patients evaluated for a suspicion of CA.
为帮助诊断心脏淀粉样变性(CA),已开发出多种评分方法。最新的梅奥经淀粉样蛋白淀粉样变性心肌病(ATTR-CM)评分未经外部验证。我们在一组因怀疑患有 CA 而接受评估的患者中比较了 ATTR-CM 评分与以前的工具(室壁厚度增加 [IWT] 评分、AMYLoidosis 指数 [AMYLI] 评分和心脏生物标志物)的诊断性能。
{"title":"The Mayo ATTR-CM score versus other diagnostic scores and cardiac biomarkers in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis","authors":"Giovanni Battista Bonfioli, Daniela Tomasoni, Giuseppe Vergaro, Vincenzo Castiglione, Marianna Adamo, Iacopo Fabiani, Victor Loghin, Carlo Mario Lombardi, Alessio Nicolai, Marco Metra, Michele Emdin, Alberto Aimo","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3455","url":null,"abstract":"Several scores were developed to help the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA). The most recent one, being the Mayo transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) score, was not externally validated. We compared the diagnostic performance of the ATTR-CM score with previous tools (increased wall thickness [IWT] score, AMYLoidosis Index [AMYLI] score, and cardiac biomarkers) in a cohort of patients evaluated for a suspicion of CA.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"383 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142160937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Riccardo M Inciardi, Laura Staal, Beth Davison, Carlo M Lombardi, Douwe Postmus, Michael G Felker, Gerasimos Filippatos, Barry Greenberg, Peter S Pang, Piotr Ponikowski, Thomas Severin, Claudio Gimpelewicz, John Teerlink, Gad Cotter, Adriaan A Voors, Marco Metra
Aims: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a major cause of hospitalizations and death in the elderly. However, elderly patients are often underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. We analysed the impact of age on clinical outcomes and response to treatment in patients enrolled in Relaxin in Acute Heart Failure (RELAX-AHF-2), a study that included older patients than in previous AHF trials.
Methods and results: The RELAX-AHF-2 randomized patients admitted for AHF to infusion of serelaxin or placebo. We examined the association of pre-specified clinical outcomes and treatment effect according to age categories [(years): <65 (n = 1411), 65-74 (n = 1832), 75-79 (n = 1222), 80-84 (n = 1156) and ≥85 (n = 924)]. The mean age of the 6545 patients enrolled in RELAX-AHF-2 was 73.0 ± 11 years. The risk of all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) death (all p < 0.001) as well as the composite endpoint of CV death or heart failure/renal failure rehospitalization through 180 days (p = 0.002) and hospital discharge through day 60 (p = 0.013) were all directly associated with age categories. Age remained independently associated with outcomes after adjustment for clinical confounders and the results were consistent when age was analysed continuously. No clinically significant change in treatment effects of serelaxin was observed across age categories for the pre-specified endpoints (interaction p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Elderly patients are at higher risk of short- and long-term CV outcomes after a hospitalization for AHF. Further efforts are needed to improve CV outcomes in this population.
{"title":"Impact of age on clinical outcomes and response to serelaxin in patients with acute heart failure: An analysis from the RELAX-AHF-2 trial.","authors":"Riccardo M Inciardi, Laura Staal, Beth Davison, Carlo M Lombardi, Douwe Postmus, Michael G Felker, Gerasimos Filippatos, Barry Greenberg, Peter S Pang, Piotr Ponikowski, Thomas Severin, Claudio Gimpelewicz, John Teerlink, Gad Cotter, Adriaan A Voors, Marco Metra","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Acute heart failure (AHF) is a major cause of hospitalizations and death in the elderly. However, elderly patients are often underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. We analysed the impact of age on clinical outcomes and response to treatment in patients enrolled in Relaxin in Acute Heart Failure (RELAX-AHF-2), a study that included older patients than in previous AHF trials.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The RELAX-AHF-2 randomized patients admitted for AHF to infusion of serelaxin or placebo. We examined the association of pre-specified clinical outcomes and treatment effect according to age categories [(years): <65 (n = 1411), 65-74 (n = 1832), 75-79 (n = 1222), 80-84 (n = 1156) and ≥85 (n = 924)]. The mean age of the 6545 patients enrolled in RELAX-AHF-2 was 73.0 ± 11 years. The risk of all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) death (all p < 0.001) as well as the composite endpoint of CV death or heart failure/renal failure rehospitalization through 180 days (p = 0.002) and hospital discharge through day 60 (p = 0.013) were all directly associated with age categories. Age remained independently associated with outcomes after adjustment for clinical confounders and the results were consistent when age was analysed continuously. No clinically significant change in treatment effects of serelaxin was observed across age categories for the pre-specified endpoints (interaction p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elderly patients are at higher risk of short- and long-term CV outcomes after a hospitalization for AHF. Further efforts are needed to improve CV outcomes in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142138778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthew W. Segar, Muhammad Shariq Usman, Kershaw V. Patel, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Javed Butler, Lakshman Manjunath, Carolyn S.P. Lam, Subodh Verma, DuWayne Willett, David Kao, James L. Januzzi, Ambarish Pandey