Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility最新文献

Background/aims: Fexuprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, was developed for treating acid-related disorders. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of fexuprazan, unlike those of proton pump inhibitors, are independent of food effect. This study aims to evaluate differences in efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) according to the timing of dosing.

Methods: In this multicenter, open-label noninferiority study, patients who had typical reflux symptoms with endoscopically confirmed EE were randomized 1:1 to receive fexuprazan 40 mg daily 30 minutes before or after meal. Treatment was completed after 2 weeks or 4 weeks when healing was endoscopically confirmed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with healed EE confirmed by endoscopy up to week 4. Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results: In the prior-to-meal group (n = 89) and after-meal group (n = 86), 4-week EE healing rates were 98.77% and 100.00% (difference, 0.01%; 95% CI, -0.01% to 0.04%) and 2-week EE healing rates were 95.77% and 97.14% (difference, 0.01%; 95% CI, -0.05% to 0.07%), respectively. TEAEs were 9.78% and 8.70% in the prior-to-meal group and the after-meal group, respectively.

Conclusions: Non-inferiority analysis revealed that taking fexuprazan after meal was non-inferior to taking fexuprazan before meals in patients with EE. The frequency of adverse events was similar between the 2 study groups. The drug is safe and effective for healing EE regardless of the timing of dosing.

Background/aims: Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) is characterized by chronic gastrointestinal symptoms that arise following an episode of infectious enteritis. The incidence rates vary, ranging from 5% to 32% and the risk factors are not well known. We aim to investigate the incidence and risk factors of PI-IBS in enteritis patients admitted to university hospitals in Korea.

Methods: This multi-center prospective study was conducted in patients hospitalized for infectious enteritis. Each patient underwent 1 outpatient visit and 3 telephone surveys during the first year after discharge to determine if PI-IBS occurred within the follow-up period.

Results: In the 3-month survey, 7 out of 354 patients (2%) were diagnosed with PI-IBS, and after 1 year, only 1 patient met the criteria for IBS. No statistically significant difference was found between the PI-IBS group and the non-PI-IBS group in terms of age, sex, underlying diseases, medication history, gastrointestinal symptoms, enteritis location, causative strain, hospitalization and treatment periods, and laboratory findings. Female sex (P = 0.003), enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) infection (P = 0.044), and a longer total treatment period (P = 0.018) were independent risk factors for diarrhea lasting ≥ 3 months after enteritis.

Conclusions: The incidence of PI-IBS in Korea was relatively low, and most cases improved over time. No risk factors associated with the development of PI-IBS were found. However, persistent diarrhea after enteritis was associated with female sex, EPEC infection, and severe or long-lasting enteritis. IBS symptoms may persist after severe enteritis but usually improve with time.

Background/aims: Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) is a rare cause of intestinal dysmotility. First-line treatment in adult patients is medical and nutritional therapy. For patients who fail these treatment options, surgical interventions may be an option. In this scoping review, we aim to investigate the current research on surgical interventions for CIPO in adults.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were queried for articles related to surgical interventions for adults with CIPO. Search terms included: intestinal dysmotility, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, global intestinal dysmotility, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, gastrointestinal paresis, neurogastrointestinal motility disorder, and chronic small intestinal motility disorder.

Results: Initial search identified 4763 records; 4722 were deemed irrelevant after screening and were excluded. The remaining 41 reports were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Twenty-one additional studies were excluded after in-depth assessment. The remaining 20 reports were: 9 cohort studies, 7 case reports, and 4 reviews. Of these, 10 studies had study populations of < 10 patients, while 6 had ≥ 10 patients. The remaining 4 were reviews. Results of these papers described the safety and effectiveness of various surgical interventions for adults with CIPO, including percutaneous endoscopic procedures, surgical decompression, small bowel resection, and intestinal transplantation.

Conclusions: Data pertaining to surgical therapy for CIPO is limited. Although this review suggests that surgical interventions for CIPO may be safe and effective for select patients, strong conclusions cannot be made due to limited number of relevant studies and small sample sizes. Concerted efforts to produce data from large studies on adults with CIPO are necessary.

Background/aims: Buspirone shows promise in treating disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), particularly functional dyspepsia. However, findings have been mixed.

Methods: We systematically searched for prospective studies testing buspirone for any upper gastrointestinal DGBI in 4 databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo). The primary outcome was any validated measure of gastrointestinal symptoms. Anxiety, depression and adverse events were secondary outcomes. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we performed random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference (SMD) in post-treatment scores between buspirone and control groups. Risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Depression Anxiety and Neurosis Group (CCDAN) scale.

Results: Ten studies (n = 283) met inclusion criteria, comprising 5 RCTs, 1 N-of-1 trial, 1 cohort, 1 case series, and 2 case reports. Tolerability of buspirone was good. In meta-analysis, buspirone produced a non-significant improvement in functional dyspepsia/gastroparesis symptoms compared to placebo (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.17; P = 0.39; I² = 0%; N_studies = 3). Of individual symptoms, buspirone improved bloating severity more than placebo (SMD = -0.41; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.04; P = 0.03; N_studies = 2) but did not improve post-prandial fullness (P = 0.24, N_studies = 2) or nausea (P = 0.75, N_studies = 2). All RCTs included in the meta-analysis were good quality but most treated for only 4 weeks.

Conclusions: We found that buspirone did not improve functional dyspepsia symptoms more than placebo, though studies were small. Buspirone showed benefit for bloating severity, albeit based on few studies. Larger and longer trials of buspirone, targeting more defined groups such as patients with bloating, are warranted.

Background/aims: Amitriptyline is prescribed off-label for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We conducted a meta-analysis to assess its efficacy.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted until November 10, 2023, using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to study the efficacy of amitriptyline in patients with IBS. We included all randomized controlled trials that compared amitriptyline to placebo. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Meta-analyses were performed using a bivariate random-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed using R Software 4.2.3 and heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

Results: Seven trials were included with 796 patients (61% female). Amitriptyline was associated with better treatment response (OR, 5.30; 95% CI, 2.47 to 11.39; P < 0.001), reduced Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scores (MD, -50.72; 95% CI, -94.23 to -7.20; P = 0.020) and improved diarrhea (OR, 10.55; 95% CI, 2.90 to 38.41; P < 0.001). No significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the adverse effects was observed. Three trials showed an overall low risk of bias, 2 trials showed an overall high risk of bias due to randomization and missing data, and 2 trials had some concerns regarding missing data.

Conclusions: Amitriptyline was found to be well-tolerated and effective in treating IBS compared to placebo. These findings support the use of amitriptyline for the management of IBS, particularly among patients with the IBS diarrhea subtype. Future research should focus on the dose-dependent effects of amitriptyline in IBS to better guide clinicians in personalized titration regimens.

Background/aims: Globus is often linked with gastroesophageal reflux disease, which influences its treatment strategies. This study aimed to investigate clinical characteristics of patients with refractory proton pump inhibitor (PPI) globus to better understand its etiology.

Methods: Between 2017 and 2023, 123 out of 592 patients with Globus from the Samsung medical center outpatient clinic who were unresponsive to eight weeks of PPI treatment were analyzed. Patients underwent 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and highresolution manometry (HRM). They were divided into acid reflux, non-acid reflux, and no reflux groups, with basal impedance (BI) measurements taken at 3, 9, and 15 cm along the esophagus. These values were compared against data of healthy volunteers to identify significant differences across groups.

Results: The acid reflux group displayed a median impedance of 1152 Ω at 3 cm, which was significantly lower than the median impedance of the non-acid reflux group (2644 Ω) and the no-reflux group (3083 Ω), highlighting varying degrees of reflux impact (P = 0.015). Most patients in non-acid reflux and no-reflux groups showed higher impedance levels at both 3 cm and 15 cm compared to the first quartile of healthy individuals with significant differences (P = 0.032 and P = 0.029, respectively). There was no notable difference in the average impedance variation between 3 cm and 15 cm in the no-reflux group (P = 0.540).

Conclusions: Reduced proximal BI values compared to distal BI values suggest increased permeability in globus patients. Further studies with a larger cohort of refractory PPI patients and healthy volunteers are needed to explore these findings and their implications on globus etiology.

Background/aims: Chronic constipation is an important public health problem and significantly affects women's lives. It is important to investigate nonpharmacological applications that can be used in the treatment of chronic constipation. The aim is to assess how abdominal massage and Kinesio taping impact constipation severity, quality of life (QOL), and perception of subjective improvement in women with chronic constipation.

Methods: Following the Rome IV diagnostic criteria, women with constipation were randomly sorted into 3 distinct groups for study: massage group (lifestyle recommendations + abdominal massage, n = 22), taping group (lifestyle recommendations + Kinesio taping, n = 22), and control group (lifestyle recommendations, n = 22). Constipation Severity Instrument (CSI) (for constipation severity), 7 days bowel diary (for bowel function), Patient Assessment of Constipation QOL (PAC-QOL) questionnaire (for QOL), 4-item Likert-type scale (for perception of subjective improvement) was used.

Results: The group x time interaction effect was significant in all CSI, bowel diary and PAC-QQL parameters, except for incomplete evacuation and PAC-QOL-worries/concerns, and a large effect size was found (Partial η2 > 0.14). Improvement scores of all parameters (except CSI-obstructive defecation, incomplete evacuation, PAC-QOL-worries/concerns) were similar in the massage and taping groups and were better than the control group. Noteworthy perceptions of subjective improvement and normalization of stool type predominantly manifested in the massage group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Abdominal massage and Kinesio taping are recommended as initial conservative interventions for managing chronic constipation within the therapeutic spectrum.

Background/aims: Pharyngeal pump, esophageal peristalsis, and phrenic ampulla emptying play important roles in the propulsion of bolus from the mouth to the stomach. There is limited information available on the mechanism of normal and abnormal phrenic ampulla emptying. The goal of our study is to describe the relationship between bolus flow and esophageal pressure profiles during the phrenic ampulla emptying in normal subjects and patient with phrenic ampulla dysfunction.

Methods: Pressure (using topography) and bolus flow (using changes in impedance) relationship through the esophagus and phrenic ampulla were determined in 15 normal subjects and 15 patients with retrograde escape of bolus from the phrenic ampulla into esophagus during primary peristalsis.

Results: During the phrenic ampulla phase, 2 high pressure peaks (proximal, related to lower esophageal sphincter and distal, related to crural diaphragm) were observed in normal subjects and patients during the phrenic ampulla emptying phase. The proximal was always higher than the distal one in normal subjects; in contrast, reverse was the case in patients with the retrograde escape of bolus from the phrenic ampulla into the esophagus.

Conclusions: We propose that a strong after-contraction of the lower esophageal sphincter plays an important role in the normal phrenic ampullary emptying. A defective lower esophageal after-contraction, along with high crural diaphragm pressure are responsible for the phrenic ampulla emptying dysfunction.