Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility最新文献

Background/aims: Adult idiopathic gastroparesis, characterized by delayed gastric emptying without mechanical obstruction, presents with symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, early satiety, and postprandial fullness. Diagnostic criteria vary across studies, leading to inconsistencies in diagnosis and management. This systematic review explores the diagnostic criteria and categorization of definite, probable, and possible idiopathic gastroparesis in the literature.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published in English up to January 2024. Observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort designs) that provided diagnostic criteria for idiopathic gastroparesis were included. Data were extracted on demographics, co-existing conditions, symptoms, and diagnostic approaches. Quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists.

Results: Of 2235 initial results, 11 studies met our inclusion criteria. Most studies were of high quality, exclusively from Western research centers, and had a preponderance of female patients (61.7% to 85.9%) with mean ages ranging from 40.0 years to 58.9 years. Diagnostic variability was noted. A definite diagnosis was most often based on clinical symptoms and positive gastric emptying scintigraphy, while probable gastroparesis was identified by suggestive symptoms with normal upper endoscopy findings. Nausea and upper abdominal pain were frequently reported symptoms. Significant overlaps were observed between idiopathic gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia.

Conclusions: The findings highlight the inherent diagnostic challenges and underscores the need for confirming delayed gastric emptying to clinch an accurate diagnosis of gastroparesis. Future research should focus on developing consistent diagnostic criteria across diverse populations to improve the diagnosis and management of idiopathic gastroparesis.

Background/aims: Obesity is associated with several gastrointestinal (GI) disorders and has been identified as a potential risk factor for various GI symptoms. Bowel frequency is an important indicator of bowel function. However, the causal link between obesity and gastrointestinal motility remains uncertain. This study aims to determine the causal effect of overall and central obesity on stool frequency.

Methods: Four obesity-related anthropometric indicators-body mass index, body fat percentage, waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)-were investigated. Individual-level baseline information from the UK Biobank was used to explore observational associations between obesity and stool frequency. Additionally, summary-level data from published genome-wide association studies were subjected to two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to examine causal associations.

Results: For all 4 indicators of obesity, higher levels of obesity were associated with more frequent bowel movements after adjusting for demographic characteristics, lifestyle, and dietary factors. After rigorous screening, 482 body mass index single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 7 body fat percentage SNPs, 48 WC SNPs, and 287 WHR SNPs were identified as instrument variables for MR analysis. The MR results were generally consistent with observational findings, proving that the associations observed in the overall obesity indicators were causal. For central obesity, the association between WHR and stool frequency remained consistent in both analysis phases, whereas WC showed a multidirectional association.

Conclusions: Obesity-related anthropometric indicators were causally associated with increased stool frequency in the overall and central obesity groups. Weight loss could be a potential approach to improve gastrointestinal regularity in individuals with obesity.

Background/aims: The association between caffeine intake and constipation remains inconclusive. This study aims to investigate whether caffeine intake is associated with constipation.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 13 941 adults from the 2005-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The weighted logistic regression analyses were exerted to evaluate the association between caffeine intake and constipation. Besides, stratified analyses and interaction tests were conducted to determine the potential modifying factors.

Results: After adjusting for confounders, increased caffeine intake by 100 mg was not associated with constipation, as defined by stool frequency (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94-1.10) or stool consistency (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.98-1.05). Subgroup analyses showed that cholesterol intake modified the relationship between increased caffeine by 100 mg and stool frequency-defined constipation (P for interaction = 0.037). Each 100 mg increase in caffeine intake was associated with a 20% decreased risk of constipation defined by stool frequency in participants who consumed high cholesterol (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-1.00), but no association in the other 2 cholesterol level groups. Furthermore, the association between caffeine intake and stool consistency-defined constipation was not found in different cholesterol groups.

Conclusions: Caffeine consumption is not associated with stool frequency or consistency-defined constipation. Nevertheless, increased caffeine intake may decrease the risk of constipation (defined by stool frequency) among participants in the high-cholesterol intake group.

Background/aims: Panenteric gastrointestinal dysmotility in diabetic gastroenteropathy remains incompletely understood. We aim to (1) compare gastrointestinal transit times, contractile activity, and pH levels between individuals with and without diabetic gastroenteropathy and (2) investigate associations between symptoms and contractile activity.

Methods: We compared 37 healthy individuals to 68 individuals with diabetic gastroenteropathy. Gastrointestinal segmental transit times, contractile activity, and pH were measured with SmartPill. The Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale were used to evaluate symptoms.

Results: Compared to controls, individuals with diabetic gastroenteropathy had prolonged median gastric emptying time (3.3 [IQR, 2.5-4.4] vs 2.5 [IQR, 1.9-3.6] hours, P = 0.023), antroduodenal transition time (23 [IQR, 8-52] vs 11 [IQR, 2-25] minutes, P = 0.015), colonic transit times (36.0 [IQR, 17.3-53.5) vs 20.8 [IQR, 14.0-28.8] hours, P = 0.004), and whole-gut transit time (46.1 [IQR, 24.3-72.9] vs 28.7 [IQR, 22.0-42.7] hours, P = 0.002). The diabetes group had lower antral contraction frequency (1.5 [IQR, 0.9-2.1] vs 2.5 [IQR, 1.5-3.9] contractions per minute, P = 0.004) and sum of amplitudes (1941 [1377-2763] vs 2975 [1734-5337] mmHg, P = 0.004). In contrast, the diabetes group had higher colonic sum of amplitudes and area under the contraction curve. The antral contraction frequency was unassociated with gastrointestinal symptoms. Still, the overall stomach contraction frequency increased by 30% (P < 0.001) and 15% (P = 0.003) in individuals with diabetes for each incremental increase in nausea and reflux scores, respectively.

Conclusions: Gastrointestinal transit times, as well as antral and colonic contractile activity, differed between individuals with diabetic gastroenteropathy and controls. The overall gastric contraction frequency was associated with symptom severity.

Background/aims: Rectal hyposensitivity (RH), as defined by the London Classification, has been linked to sensory dysfunction caused by diabetes mellitus and Parkinson's disease (PD); however, its clinical interpretation has not been sufficiently validated. In this study, we aim to explore the correlations between rectal sensory thresholds and the clinical characteristics of patients with functional defecatory disorders.

Methods: We reviewed data from patients who underwent high-resolution anorectal manometry and acquired their clinical characteristics using a standardized questionnaire. The associations between RH based on either 1 (borderline RH) or 2 (RH) abnormal rectal sensory thresholds and patients' clinical and demographic characteristics were analyzed using linear and logistic regression models in the overall sex-stratified populations.

Results: We enrolled 2540 patients, of whom 1046 (41.2%) were men. Overall, 150 (5.9%) patients were diagnosed with RH, whereas 422 (16.6%) had borderline RH. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) increased linearly with the increase in the number of abnormal rectal sensory thresholds (effect per threshold: 0.900 [standard deviation: 0.188]). Upon stratification by sex, borderline RH was positively associated with diabetes mellitus, PD, and CCCS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.11, 95% confidence interval [1.08, 4.15]; aOR = 1.49 [1.03, 2.14]; aOR = 1.03 [1.01, 1.05], respectively) in women. However, RH was positively associated with only the CCCS.

Conclusions: Defining RH based on 1 or more abnormal sensory thresholds showed better clinical correlation with patient characteristics. However, further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before proposing revisions to the current London classification criteria.

Background/aims: Globus is often linked with gastroesophageal reflux disease, which influences its treatment strategies. This study aims to investigate clinical characteristics of patients with refractory proton pump inhibitor (PPI) globus to better understand its etiology.

Methods: Between 2017 and 2023, 122 out of 592 patients with globus from the Samsung Medical Center outpatient clinic who were unresponsive to 8 weeks of PPI treatment were analyzed. Patients underwent 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM). They were divided into acid reflux, non-acid reflux, and no reflux groups, with basal impedance (BI) measurements taken at 3, 9, and 15 cm along the esophagus. These values were compared against data of healthy volunteers to identify significant differences across groups.

Results: The acid reflux group displayed a median impedance of 1152 Ω at 3 cm, which was significantly lower than the median impedance of the non-acid reflux group (2644 Ω) and the no-reflux group (3083 Ω) (P = 0.015). Most patients in non-acid reflux and no-reflux groups showed higher impedance levels at both 3 cm and 15 cm compared to the first quartile of healthy individuals with significant differences (P = 0.032 and P = 0.029, respectively). Proximal BI was significantly lower than distal BI in both groups: 2278 Ω vs 2644 Ω in the non-acid reflux group (P = 0.035) and 2387 Ω vs 3083 Ω in the no-reflux group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Reduced proximal BI values compared to distal BI values suggest increased permeability in globus patients. Further studies with a larger cohort of refractory PPI patients and healthy volunteers are needed to explore these findings and their implications on globus etiology.

Background/aims: Although the association between the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the risk of gastric cancer has been postulated in casecontrol and cohort studies, it remains still controversial. We aim to evaluate association of PPI use with gastric cancer in regions with high prevalence of gastric cancer, particularly in patients who underwent eradication of Helicobacter pylori, by systemic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Comprehensive literature search through the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane database was performed in October 2023. We used random effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between PPI use and gastric cancer. The Cochran Q-statistic and the I² test were employed for evaluating potential heterogeneity between studies.

Results: Two case-control and 6 cohort studies were identified. PPI use was significantly associated with the development of gastric cancer (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.35-3.01). In subgroup analysis carried out according to the study design, sample size, and adjustment of confounding factors (age, sex, and H. pylori), such association was significant. A meta-analysis of 4 studies performed in patients with H. pylori eradication history showed that the use of PPIs was significantly associated with an elevated incidence of gastric cancer (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.48-2.97).

Conclusions: Long-term use of PPIs is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer in Asian regions with high prevalence of gastric cancer, particularly in subjects who have eradication history of H. pylori. Optimization of long-term PPI use seems to be necessary in regions where gastric cancer is prevalent.