Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology最新文献

Background: Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Identification of risk factors for postoperative AKI is clinically important. Serum lactate can increase in situations of inadequate oxygen delivery and is widely used to assess a patient's clinical course. We investigated the association between intraoperative serum lactate levels and AKI after brain tumor resection.

Methods: Demographics, medical and surgical history, tumor characteristics, surgery, anesthesia, preoperative and intraoperative blood test results, and postoperative clinical outcomes were retrospectively collected from 4131 patients who had undergone brain tumor resection. Patients were divided into high (n=1078) and low (n=3053) lactate groups based on an intraoperative maximum serum lactate level of 3.35 mmol/L. After propensity score matching, 1005 patients were included per group. AKI was diagnosed using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria, based on serum creatinine levels within 7 days after surgery.

Results: Postoperative AKI was observed in 53 (1.3%) patients and was more frequent in those with high lactate both before (3.2% [n=35] vs. 0.6% [n=18]; P < 0.001) and after (3.3% [n=33] vs. 0.6% [n=6]; P < 0.001) propensity score matching. Intraoperative predictors of postoperative AKI were maximum serum lactate levels > 3.35 mmol/L (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.57 [1.45-8.74], P = 0.005), minimum blood pH (odds ratio per 1 unit, 0.01 [0.00-0.24], P = 0.004), minimum hematocrit (odds ratio per 1%, 0.91 [0.84-1.00], P = 0.037), and mean serum glucose levels > 200 mg/dL (odds ratio, 6.22 [1.75-22.16], P = 0.005).

Conclusion: High intraoperative serum lactate levels were associated with AKI after brain tumor resection.

Background: Frontal electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring can be useful in guiding the titration of anesthetics, but it is not always feasible to place electrodes in the standard configuration in some circumstances, including during neurosurgery. This study compares 5 alternate configurations of the Masimo Sedline Sensor.

Methods: Ten stably sedated patients in the intensive care unit were recruited. Frontal EEG was monitored in the standard configuration (bifrontal upright) and 5 alternate configurations: bifrontal inverse, infraorbital, lateral upright, lateral inverse, and semilateral. Average power spectral densities (PSDs) with 95% CIs in the alternate configurations were compared to PSDs in the standard configuration. Two-one-sided-testing with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests assessed equivalence in the spectral edge frequency (SEF-95), EEG power, and relative delta (0.5 to 3.5 Hz), alpha (8 to 12 Hz), and beta (20 to 30 Hz) power between each alternate and standard configurations.

Results: After the removal of unanalyzable tracings, 7 patients were included for analysis in the infraorbital configuration and 9 in all other configurations. In the lateral upright and lateral inverse configurations, PSDs significantly differed from the standard configuration within the 15 to 20 Hz band. The greatest decrease in EEG power was in the lateral inverse configuration (median: -97 dB; IQR: -130, -62 dB). The largest change in frequency distribution of EEG power was in the infraorbital configuration; median SEF-95 change of -1.4 Hz (IQR: -2.8, 0.7 Hz), median relative delta power change of +7.3% (IQR: 1.4%, 7.9%), and median relative alpha power change of -0.6% (IQR: -5.7%, 0.0%).

Conclusions: These 5 alternate Sedline electrode configurations are suitable options for monitoring frontal EEG when the standard configuration is not possible.

Background: Awake craniotomy is performed to resect brain tumors in eloquent brain areas to maximize tumor reduction and minimize neurological damage. Evidence suggests that intraoperative anesthetic management of awake craniotomy with remimazolam is safe. We compared the time to arousal and efficacy of anesthetic management with remimazolam and propofol during awake craniotomy.

Methods: In a single-institution randomized, prospective study, patients who underwent elective awake craniotomy were randomized to receive remimazolam and reversal with flumazenil (group R) or propofol (group P). The primary end point was time to awaken. Secondary end points were time to loss of consciousness during induction of anesthesia, the frequency of intraoperative complications (pain, hypertension, seizures, nausea, vomiting, and delayed arousal), and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Intraoperative task performance was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) score.

Results: Fifty-eight patients were recruited, of which 52 (26 in each group) were available for the efficacy analysis. Patients in group R had faster mean (±SD) arousal times than those in the P group (890.8±239.8 vs. 1075.4±317.5 s; P =0.013)and higher and more reliable intraoperative task performance (NRS score 8.81±1.50 vs. 7.69±2.36; P =0.043). There were no significant intraoperative complications.

Conclusions: Compared with propofol, remimazolam was associated with more rapid loss of consciousness and, after administration of flumazenil, with faster arousal times and improved intraoperative task performance.